Global X - 0-3 Month T-Bill - ETF
Global X - 0-3 Month T-Bill - ETF (CBIL.TO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CBIL.TO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CBIL.TO | CA$50.03 | +0.01% | 1.7B | N/A | N/A | +3.12% |
| BLK.NE | CA$29.10 | +1.93% | 231.1B | 25.89 | CA$1.12 | N/A |
| BN.TO | CA$93.12 | +3.34% | 152.6B | 231.45 | CA$0.40 | +0.51% |
| BAM.TO | CA$86.00 | +4.22% | 136.7B | 45.10 | CA$1.88 | +2.69% |
| VFV.TO | CA$154.77 | +1.34% | 23.4B | 27.46 | CA$5.61 | +0.99% |
| ZSP.TO | CA$95.37 | +1.29% | 18.9B | N/A | N/A | +0.88% |
| PHYS.TO | CA$35.61 | +0.59% | 16.6B | 3.77 | CA$9.48 | N/A |
| XIU.TO | CA$42.17 | +3.62% | 14.6B | 20.49 | CA$2.03 | +2.72% |
| XEF.TO | CA$42.78 | +1.66% | 12.8B | 16.87 | CA$2.52 | +2.62% |
| VUN.TO | CA$116.18 | +1.28% | 12.1B | 26.73 | CA$4.33 | +0.91% |
Stock Comparison
CBIL.TO vs BLK.NE Comparison August 2025
CBIL.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBIL.TO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, BLK.NE has a market cap of 231.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CBIL.TO is priced at CA$50.03, while BLK.NE trades at CA$29.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BLK.NE's P/E ratio is 25.89. In terms of profitability, CBIL.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BLK.NE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CBIL.TO is less volatile compared to BLK.NE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBIL.TO.Check BLK.NE's competition here
CBIL.TO vs BN.TO Comparison August 2025
CBIL.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBIL.TO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, BN.TO has a market cap of 152.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CBIL.TO is priced at CA$50.03, while BN.TO trades at CA$93.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BN.TO's P/E ratio is 231.45. In terms of profitability, CBIL.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BN.TO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CBIL.TO is less volatile compared to BN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBIL.TO.Check BN.TO's competition here
CBIL.TO vs BAM.TO Comparison August 2025
CBIL.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBIL.TO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, BAM.TO has a market cap of 136.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CBIL.TO is priced at CA$50.03, while BAM.TO trades at CA$86.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BAM.TO's P/E ratio is 45.10. In terms of profitability, CBIL.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BAM.TO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CBIL.TO is less volatile compared to BAM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBIL.TO.Check BAM.TO's competition here
CBIL.TO vs VFV.TO Comparison August 2025
CBIL.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBIL.TO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, VFV.TO has a market cap of 23.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CBIL.TO is priced at CA$50.03, while VFV.TO trades at CA$154.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VFV.TO's P/E ratio is 27.46. In terms of profitability, CBIL.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VFV.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CBIL.TO is less volatile compared to VFV.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBIL.TO.Check VFV.TO's competition here
CBIL.TO vs ZSP.TO Comparison August 2025
CBIL.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBIL.TO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ZSP.TO has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CBIL.TO is priced at CA$50.03, while ZSP.TO trades at CA$95.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZSP.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CBIL.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZSP.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CBIL.TO is less volatile compared to ZSP.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBIL.TO.Check ZSP.TO's competition here
CBIL.TO vs PHYS.TO Comparison August 2025
CBIL.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBIL.TO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, PHYS.TO has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CBIL.TO is priced at CA$50.03, while PHYS.TO trades at CA$35.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PHYS.TO's P/E ratio is 3.77. In terms of profitability, CBIL.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PHYS.TO's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CBIL.TO is less volatile compared to PHYS.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBIL.TO.Check PHYS.TO's competition here
CBIL.TO vs XIU.TO Comparison August 2025
CBIL.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBIL.TO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, XIU.TO has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CBIL.TO is priced at CA$50.03, while XIU.TO trades at CA$42.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XIU.TO's P/E ratio is 20.49. In terms of profitability, CBIL.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XIU.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CBIL.TO is less volatile compared to XIU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBIL.TO.Check XIU.TO's competition here
CBIL.TO vs XEF.TO Comparison August 2025
CBIL.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBIL.TO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, XEF.TO has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CBIL.TO is priced at CA$50.03, while XEF.TO trades at CA$42.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XEF.TO's P/E ratio is 16.87. In terms of profitability, CBIL.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XEF.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CBIL.TO is less volatile compared to XEF.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBIL.TO.Check XEF.TO's competition here
CBIL.TO vs VUN.TO Comparison August 2025
CBIL.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBIL.TO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, VUN.TO has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CBIL.TO is priced at CA$50.03, while VUN.TO trades at CA$116.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VUN.TO's P/E ratio is 26.73. In terms of profitability, CBIL.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VUN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CBIL.TO is less volatile compared to VUN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBIL.TO.Check VUN.TO's competition here
CBIL.TO vs IGM.TO Comparison August 2025
CBIL.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBIL.TO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, IGM.TO has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, CBIL.TO is priced at CA$50.03, while IGM.TO trades at CA$46.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IGM.TO's P/E ratio is 11.71. In terms of profitability, CBIL.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IGM.TO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CBIL.TO is less volatile compared to IGM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBIL.TO.Check IGM.TO's competition here
CBIL.TO vs ZCN.TO Comparison August 2025
CBIL.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBIL.TO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ZCN.TO has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CBIL.TO is priced at CA$50.03, while ZCN.TO trades at CA$37.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZCN.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CBIL.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZCN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CBIL.TO is less volatile compared to ZCN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBIL.TO.Check ZCN.TO's competition here
CBIL.TO vs ZEA.TO Comparison August 2025
CBIL.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBIL.TO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ZEA.TO has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CBIL.TO is priced at CA$50.03, while ZEA.TO trades at CA$25.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZEA.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CBIL.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZEA.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CBIL.TO is less volatile compared to ZEA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBIL.TO.Check ZEA.TO's competition here
CBIL.TO vs VCN.TO Comparison August 2025
CBIL.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBIL.TO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, VCN.TO has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, CBIL.TO is priced at CA$50.03, while VCN.TO trades at CA$57.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VCN.TO's P/E ratio is 20.16. In terms of profitability, CBIL.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VCN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CBIL.TO is less volatile compared to VCN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBIL.TO.Check VCN.TO's competition here
CBIL.TO vs PSLV.TO Comparison August 2025
CBIL.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBIL.TO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, PSLV.TO has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CBIL.TO is priced at CA$50.03, while PSLV.TO trades at CA$17.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PSLV.TO's P/E ratio is 4.23. In terms of profitability, CBIL.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PSLV.TO's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CBIL.TO is less volatile compared to PSLV.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBIL.TO.Check PSLV.TO's competition here
CBIL.TO vs XUS.TO Comparison August 2025
CBIL.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBIL.TO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, XUS.TO has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CBIL.TO is priced at CA$50.03, while XUS.TO trades at CA$54.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XUS.TO's P/E ratio is 27.42. In terms of profitability, CBIL.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XUS.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CBIL.TO is less volatile compared to XUS.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBIL.TO.Check XUS.TO's competition here
CBIL.TO vs XIC.TO Comparison August 2025
CBIL.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBIL.TO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, XIC.TO has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CBIL.TO is priced at CA$50.03, while XIC.TO trades at CA$44.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XIC.TO's P/E ratio is 20.01. In terms of profitability, CBIL.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XIC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CBIL.TO is less volatile compared to XIC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBIL.TO.Check XIC.TO's competition here
CBIL.TO vs XSP.TO Comparison August 2025
CBIL.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBIL.TO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, XSP.TO has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CBIL.TO is priced at CA$50.03, while XSP.TO trades at CA$65.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XSP.TO's P/E ratio is 27.18. In terms of profitability, CBIL.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XSP.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CBIL.TO is less volatile compared to XSP.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBIL.TO.Check XSP.TO's competition here
CBIL.TO vs CEF.TO Comparison August 2025
CBIL.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBIL.TO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CEF.TO has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CBIL.TO is priced at CA$50.03, while CEF.TO trades at CA$42.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CEF.TO's P/E ratio is 22.53. In terms of profitability, CBIL.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CEF.TO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CBIL.TO is less volatile compared to CEF.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBIL.TO.Check CEF.TO's competition here
CBIL.TO vs XEQT.TO Comparison August 2025
CBIL.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBIL.TO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, XEQT.TO has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CBIL.TO is priced at CA$50.03, while XEQT.TO trades at CA$36.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XEQT.TO's P/E ratio is 21.03. In terms of profitability, CBIL.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XEQT.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CBIL.TO is less volatile compared to XEQT.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBIL.TO.Check XEQT.TO's competition here
CBIL.TO vs ONEX.TO Comparison August 2025
CBIL.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBIL.TO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ONEX.TO has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CBIL.TO is priced at CA$50.03, while ONEX.TO trades at CA$112.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ONEX.TO's P/E ratio is 13.16. In terms of profitability, CBIL.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ONEX.TO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CBIL.TO is less volatile compared to ONEX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBIL.TO.Check ONEX.TO's competition here
CBIL.TO vs VEQT.TO Comparison August 2025
CBIL.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBIL.TO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, VEQT.TO has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CBIL.TO is priced at CA$50.03, while VEQT.TO trades at CA$49.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VEQT.TO's P/E ratio is 21.20. In terms of profitability, CBIL.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VEQT.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CBIL.TO is less volatile compared to VEQT.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBIL.TO.Check VEQT.TO's competition here
CBIL.TO vs VGRO.TO Comparison August 2025
CBIL.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBIL.TO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, VGRO.TO has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CBIL.TO is priced at CA$50.03, while VGRO.TO trades at CA$39.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VGRO.TO's P/E ratio is 21.00. In terms of profitability, CBIL.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VGRO.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CBIL.TO is less volatile compared to VGRO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBIL.TO.Check VGRO.TO's competition here
CBIL.TO vs CASH.TO Comparison August 2025
CBIL.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBIL.TO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CASH.TO has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CBIL.TO is priced at CA$50.03, while CASH.TO trades at CA$50.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CASH.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CBIL.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CASH.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CBIL.TO and CASH.TO have similar daily volatility (0.02).Check CASH.TO's competition here
CBIL.TO vs VIU.TO Comparison August 2025
CBIL.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBIL.TO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, VIU.TO has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CBIL.TO is priced at CA$50.03, while VIU.TO trades at CA$39.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VIU.TO's P/E ratio is 16.25. In terms of profitability, CBIL.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VIU.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CBIL.TO is less volatile compared to VIU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBIL.TO.Check VIU.TO's competition here
CBIL.TO vs CSAV.TO Comparison August 2025
CBIL.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBIL.TO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CSAV.TO has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CBIL.TO is priced at CA$50.03, while CSAV.TO trades at CA$50.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CSAV.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CBIL.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CSAV.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CBIL.TO and CSAV.TO have similar daily volatility (0.02).Check CSAV.TO's competition here
CBIL.TO vs ZLB.TO Comparison August 2025
CBIL.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBIL.TO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ZLB.TO has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, CBIL.TO is priced at CA$50.03, while ZLB.TO trades at CA$54.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZLB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CBIL.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZLB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CBIL.TO is less volatile compared to ZLB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBIL.TO.Check ZLB.TO's competition here
CBIL.TO vs ZMMK.TO Comparison August 2025
CBIL.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBIL.TO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ZMMK.TO has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CBIL.TO is priced at CA$50.03, while ZMMK.TO trades at CA$49.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZMMK.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CBIL.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZMMK.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CBIL.TO and ZMMK.TO have similar daily volatility (0.02).Check ZMMK.TO's competition here
CBIL.TO vs VSP.TO Comparison August 2025
CBIL.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBIL.TO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, VSP.TO has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CBIL.TO is priced at CA$50.03, while VSP.TO trades at CA$101.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VSP.TO's P/E ratio is 27.13. In terms of profitability, CBIL.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VSP.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CBIL.TO is less volatile compared to VSP.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBIL.TO.Check VSP.TO's competition here
CBIL.TO vs CIX.TO Comparison August 2025
CBIL.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBIL.TO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CIX.TO has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CBIL.TO is priced at CA$50.03, while CIX.TO trades at CA$31.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CIX.TO's P/E ratio is -17.26. In terms of profitability, CBIL.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CIX.TO's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, CBIL.TO is less volatile compared to CIX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBIL.TO.Check CIX.TO's competition here
CBIL.TO vs HXS.TO Comparison August 2025
CBIL.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBIL.TO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, HXS.TO has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CBIL.TO is priced at CA$50.03, while HXS.TO trades at CA$89.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HXS.TO's P/E ratio is 27.44. In terms of profitability, CBIL.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HXS.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CBIL.TO is less volatile compared to HXS.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBIL.TO.Check HXS.TO's competition here
CBIL.TO vs PSA.TO Comparison August 2025
CBIL.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBIL.TO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, PSA.TO has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CBIL.TO is priced at CA$50.03, while PSA.TO trades at CA$50.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PSA.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CBIL.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PSA.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CBIL.TO and PSA.TO have similar daily volatility (0.02).Check PSA.TO's competition here
CBIL.TO vs ZCS.TO Comparison August 2025
CBIL.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBIL.TO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ZCS.TO has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CBIL.TO is priced at CA$50.03, while ZCS.TO trades at CA$14.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZCS.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CBIL.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZCS.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CBIL.TO is less volatile compared to ZCS.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBIL.TO.Check ZCS.TO's competition here
CBIL.TO vs HXT.TO Comparison August 2025
CBIL.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBIL.TO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, HXT.TO has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CBIL.TO is priced at CA$50.03, while HXT.TO trades at CA$73.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HXT.TO's P/E ratio is 22.61. In terms of profitability, CBIL.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HXT.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CBIL.TO is less volatile compared to HXT.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBIL.TO.Check HXT.TO's competition here
CBIL.TO vs XSEM.TO Comparison August 2025
CBIL.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBIL.TO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, XSEM.TO has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CBIL.TO is priced at CA$50.03, while XSEM.TO trades at CA$23.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XSEM.TO's P/E ratio is 14.66. In terms of profitability, CBIL.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XSEM.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CBIL.TO is less volatile compared to XSEM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBIL.TO.Check XSEM.TO's competition here
CBIL.TO vs QUU.TO Comparison August 2025
CBIL.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBIL.TO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, QUU.TO has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, CBIL.TO is priced at CA$50.03, while QUU.TO trades at CA$251.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QUU.TO's P/E ratio is 27.89. In terms of profitability, CBIL.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to QUU.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CBIL.TO is less volatile compared to QUU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBIL.TO.Check QUU.TO's competition here
CBIL.TO vs ZEB.TO Comparison August 2025
CBIL.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBIL.TO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ZEB.TO has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, CBIL.TO is priced at CA$50.03, while ZEB.TO trades at CA$46.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZEB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CBIL.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZEB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CBIL.TO is less volatile compared to ZEB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBIL.TO.Check ZEB.TO's competition here
CBIL.TO vs VDY.TO Comparison August 2025
CBIL.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBIL.TO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, VDY.TO has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, CBIL.TO is priced at CA$50.03, while VDY.TO trades at CA$53.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VDY.TO's P/E ratio is 14.90. In terms of profitability, CBIL.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VDY.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CBIL.TO is less volatile compared to VDY.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBIL.TO.Check VDY.TO's competition here
CBIL.TO vs XQQ.TO Comparison August 2025
CBIL.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBIL.TO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, XQQ.TO has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CBIL.TO is priced at CA$50.03, while XQQ.TO trades at CA$57.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XQQ.TO's P/E ratio is 34.92. In terms of profitability, CBIL.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XQQ.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CBIL.TO is less volatile compared to XQQ.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBIL.TO.Check XQQ.TO's competition here
CBIL.TO vs XUU.TO Comparison August 2025
CBIL.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBIL.TO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, XUU.TO has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CBIL.TO is priced at CA$50.03, while XUU.TO trades at CA$64.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XUU.TO's P/E ratio is 26.52. In terms of profitability, CBIL.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XUU.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CBIL.TO is less volatile compared to XUU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBIL.TO.Check XUU.TO's competition here
CBIL.TO vs ZUE.TO Comparison August 2025
CBIL.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBIL.TO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ZUE.TO has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CBIL.TO is priced at CA$50.03, while ZUE.TO trades at CA$86.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZUE.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CBIL.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZUE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CBIL.TO is less volatile compared to ZUE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBIL.TO.Check ZUE.TO's competition here
CBIL.TO vs VBAL.TO Comparison August 2025
CBIL.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBIL.TO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, VBAL.TO has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CBIL.TO is priced at CA$50.03, while VBAL.TO trades at CA$34.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VBAL.TO's P/E ratio is 20.88. In terms of profitability, CBIL.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VBAL.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CBIL.TO is less volatile compared to VBAL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBIL.TO.Check VBAL.TO's competition here
CBIL.TO vs TPU.TO Comparison August 2025
CBIL.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBIL.TO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, TPU.TO has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CBIL.TO is priced at CA$50.03, while TPU.TO trades at CA$49.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TPU.TO's P/E ratio is 27.86. In terms of profitability, CBIL.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TPU.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CBIL.TO is less volatile compared to TPU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBIL.TO.Check TPU.TO's competition here
CBIL.TO vs TTP.TO Comparison August 2025
CBIL.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBIL.TO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, TTP.TO has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CBIL.TO is priced at CA$50.03, while TTP.TO trades at CA$31.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TTP.TO's P/E ratio is 19.85. In terms of profitability, CBIL.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TTP.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CBIL.TO is less volatile compared to TTP.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBIL.TO.Check TTP.TO's competition here
CBIL.TO vs XGRO.TO Comparison August 2025
CBIL.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBIL.TO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, XGRO.TO has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CBIL.TO is priced at CA$50.03, while XGRO.TO trades at CA$32.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XGRO.TO's P/E ratio is 21.00. In terms of profitability, CBIL.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XGRO.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CBIL.TO is less volatile compared to XGRO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBIL.TO.Check XGRO.TO's competition here
CBIL.TO vs ZWB.TO Comparison August 2025
CBIL.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBIL.TO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ZWB.TO has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CBIL.TO is priced at CA$50.03, while ZWB.TO trades at CA$21.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZWB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CBIL.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZWB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CBIL.TO is less volatile compared to ZWB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBIL.TO.Check ZWB.TO's competition here
CBIL.TO vs TPE.TO Comparison August 2025
CBIL.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBIL.TO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, TPE.TO has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CBIL.TO is priced at CA$50.03, while TPE.TO trades at CA$25.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TPE.TO's P/E ratio is 16.82. In terms of profitability, CBIL.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TPE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CBIL.TO is less volatile compared to TPE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBIL.TO.Check TPE.TO's competition here
CBIL.TO vs XAW.TO Comparison August 2025
CBIL.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBIL.TO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, XAW.TO has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CBIL.TO is priced at CA$50.03, while XAW.TO trades at CA$47.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XAW.TO's P/E ratio is 21.79. In terms of profitability, CBIL.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XAW.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CBIL.TO is less volatile compared to XAW.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBIL.TO.Check XAW.TO's competition here
CBIL.TO vs BBUC.TO Comparison August 2025
CBIL.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBIL.TO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, BBUC.TO has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, CBIL.TO is priced at CA$50.03, while BBUC.TO trades at CA$42.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BBUC.TO's P/E ratio is -2.15. In terms of profitability, CBIL.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BBUC.TO's ROE of -2.92%. Regarding short-term risk, CBIL.TO is less volatile compared to BBUC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBIL.TO.Check BBUC.TO's competition here
CBIL.TO vs VEE.TO Comparison August 2025
CBIL.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBIL.TO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, VEE.TO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CBIL.TO is priced at CA$50.03, while VEE.TO trades at CA$41.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VEE.TO's P/E ratio is 15.48. In terms of profitability, CBIL.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VEE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CBIL.TO is less volatile compared to VEE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBIL.TO.Check VEE.TO's competition here
CBIL.TO vs XBB.TO Comparison August 2025
CBIL.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBIL.TO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, XBB.TO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CBIL.TO is priced at CA$50.03, while XBB.TO trades at CA$28.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XBB.TO's P/E ratio is 10.99. In terms of profitability, CBIL.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XBB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CBIL.TO is less volatile compared to XBB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBIL.TO.Check XBB.TO's competition here
CBIL.TO vs XDIV.TO Comparison August 2025
CBIL.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBIL.TO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, XDIV.TO has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CBIL.TO is priced at CA$50.03, while XDIV.TO trades at CA$32.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XDIV.TO's P/E ratio is 16.78. In terms of profitability, CBIL.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XDIV.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CBIL.TO is less volatile compared to XDIV.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBIL.TO.Check XDIV.TO's competition here
CBIL.TO vs VXC.TO Comparison August 2025
CBIL.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBIL.TO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, VXC.TO has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CBIL.TO is priced at CA$50.03, while VXC.TO trades at CA$68.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VXC.TO's P/E ratio is 21.69. In terms of profitability, CBIL.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VXC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CBIL.TO is less volatile compared to VXC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBIL.TO.Check VXC.TO's competition here
CBIL.TO vs SII.TO Comparison August 2025
CBIL.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBIL.TO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SII.TO has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CBIL.TO is priced at CA$50.03, while SII.TO trades at CA$90.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SII.TO's P/E ratio is 35.57. In terms of profitability, CBIL.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SII.TO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CBIL.TO is less volatile compared to SII.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBIL.TO.Check SII.TO's competition here
CBIL.TO vs XEC.TO Comparison August 2025
CBIL.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBIL.TO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, XEC.TO has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CBIL.TO is priced at CA$50.03, while XEC.TO trades at CA$32.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XEC.TO's P/E ratio is 15.54. In terms of profitability, CBIL.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XEC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CBIL.TO is less volatile compared to XEC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBIL.TO.Check XEC.TO's competition here
CBIL.TO vs VCE.TO Comparison August 2025
CBIL.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBIL.TO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, VCE.TO has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CBIL.TO is priced at CA$50.03, while VCE.TO trades at CA$61.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VCE.TO's P/E ratio is 19.89. In terms of profitability, CBIL.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VCE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CBIL.TO is less volatile compared to VCE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBIL.TO.Check VCE.TO's competition here
CBIL.TO vs PFMN.TO Comparison August 2025
CBIL.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBIL.TO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, PFMN.TO has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CBIL.TO is priced at CA$50.03, while PFMN.TO trades at CA$15.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PFMN.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CBIL.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PFMN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CBIL.TO is less volatile compared to PFMN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBIL.TO.Check PFMN.TO's competition here
CBIL.TO vs ZQQ.TO Comparison August 2025
CBIL.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBIL.TO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ZQQ.TO has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CBIL.TO is priced at CA$50.03, while ZQQ.TO trades at CA$160.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZQQ.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CBIL.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZQQ.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CBIL.TO is less volatile compared to ZQQ.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBIL.TO.Check ZQQ.TO's competition here
CBIL.TO vs NSCE.TO Comparison August 2025
CBIL.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBIL.TO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, NSCE.TO has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CBIL.TO is priced at CA$50.03, while NSCE.TO trades at CA$48.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NSCE.TO's P/E ratio is 24.39. In terms of profitability, CBIL.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NSCE.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CBIL.TO is more volatile compared to NSCE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBIL.TO.Check NSCE.TO's competition here
CBIL.TO vs XCB.TO Comparison August 2025
CBIL.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBIL.TO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, XCB.TO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CBIL.TO is priced at CA$50.03, while XCB.TO trades at CA$20.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XCB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CBIL.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XCB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CBIL.TO is less volatile compared to XCB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBIL.TO.Check XCB.TO's competition here
CBIL.TO vs ZLU.TO Comparison August 2025
CBIL.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBIL.TO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ZLU.TO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CBIL.TO is priced at CA$50.03, while ZLU.TO trades at CA$56.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZLU.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CBIL.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZLU.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CBIL.TO is less volatile compared to ZLU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBIL.TO.Check ZLU.TO's competition here
CBIL.TO vs QCN.TO Comparison August 2025
CBIL.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBIL.TO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, QCN.TO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CBIL.TO is priced at CA$50.03, while QCN.TO trades at CA$170.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QCN.TO's P/E ratio is 21.53. In terms of profitability, CBIL.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to QCN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CBIL.TO is less volatile compared to QCN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBIL.TO.Check QCN.TO's competition here
CBIL.TO vs XBAL.TO Comparison August 2025
CBIL.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBIL.TO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, XBAL.TO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CBIL.TO is priced at CA$50.03, while XBAL.TO trades at CA$31.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XBAL.TO's P/E ratio is 20.53. In terms of profitability, CBIL.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XBAL.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CBIL.TO is less volatile compared to XBAL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBIL.TO.Check XBAL.TO's competition here
CBIL.TO vs VGG.TO Comparison August 2025
CBIL.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBIL.TO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, VGG.TO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CBIL.TO is priced at CA$50.03, while VGG.TO trades at CA$96.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VGG.TO's P/E ratio is 25.63. In terms of profitability, CBIL.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VGG.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CBIL.TO is less volatile compared to VGG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBIL.TO.Check VGG.TO's competition here
CBIL.TO vs MNY.TO Comparison August 2025
CBIL.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBIL.TO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, MNY.TO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CBIL.TO is priced at CA$50.03, while MNY.TO trades at CA$100.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MNY.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CBIL.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MNY.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CBIL.TO is more volatile compared to MNY.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBIL.TO.Check MNY.TO's competition here
CBIL.TO vs QQC.TO Comparison August 2025
CBIL.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBIL.TO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, QQC.TO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CBIL.TO is priced at CA$50.03, while QQC.TO trades at CA$38.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QQC.TO's P/E ratio is 34.06. In terms of profitability, CBIL.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to QQC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CBIL.TO is less volatile compared to QQC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBIL.TO.Check QQC.TO's competition here
CBIL.TO vs XEI.TO Comparison August 2025
CBIL.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBIL.TO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, XEI.TO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CBIL.TO is priced at CA$50.03, while XEI.TO trades at CA$29.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XEI.TO's P/E ratio is 17.53. In terms of profitability, CBIL.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XEI.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CBIL.TO is less volatile compared to XEI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBIL.TO.Check XEI.TO's competition here
CBIL.TO vs CMR.TO Comparison August 2025
CBIL.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBIL.TO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CMR.TO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CBIL.TO is priced at CA$50.03, while CMR.TO trades at CA$50.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMR.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CBIL.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CMR.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CBIL.TO and CMR.TO have similar daily volatility (0.02).Check CMR.TO's competition here
CBIL.TO vs HSAV.TO Comparison August 2025
CBIL.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBIL.TO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, HSAV.TO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CBIL.TO is priced at CA$50.03, while HSAV.TO trades at CA$116.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HSAV.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CBIL.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HSAV.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CBIL.TO is less volatile compared to HSAV.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBIL.TO.Check HSAV.TO's competition here
CBIL.TO vs XDV.TO Comparison August 2025
CBIL.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBIL.TO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, XDV.TO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CBIL.TO is priced at CA$50.03, while XDV.TO trades at CA$34.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XDV.TO's P/E ratio is 14.58. In terms of profitability, CBIL.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XDV.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CBIL.TO is less volatile compared to XDV.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBIL.TO.Check XDV.TO's competition here
CBIL.TO vs ZWU.TO Comparison August 2025
CBIL.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBIL.TO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ZWU.TO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CBIL.TO is priced at CA$50.03, while ZWU.TO trades at CA$11.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZWU.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CBIL.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZWU.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CBIL.TO is less volatile compared to ZWU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBIL.TO.Check ZWU.TO's competition here
CBIL.TO vs FIH-U.TO Comparison August 2025
CBIL.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBIL.TO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, FIH-U.TO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CBIL.TO is priced at CA$50.03, while FIH-U.TO trades at CA$18.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FIH-U.TO's P/E ratio is 38.37. In terms of profitability, CBIL.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FIH-U.TO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CBIL.TO is less volatile compared to FIH-U.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBIL.TO.Check FIH-U.TO's competition here
CBIL.TO vs CACB.TO Comparison August 2025
CBIL.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBIL.TO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CACB.TO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CBIL.TO is priced at CA$50.03, while CACB.TO trades at CA$20.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CACB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CBIL.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CACB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CBIL.TO is less volatile compared to CACB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBIL.TO.Check CACB.TO's competition here
CBIL.TO vs XIN.TO Comparison August 2025
CBIL.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBIL.TO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, XIN.TO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CBIL.TO is priced at CA$50.03, while XIN.TO trades at CA$38.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XIN.TO's P/E ratio is 17.37. In terms of profitability, CBIL.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XIN.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CBIL.TO is less volatile compared to XIN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBIL.TO.Check XIN.TO's competition here
CBIL.TO vs XFH.TO Comparison August 2025
CBIL.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBIL.TO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, XFH.TO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CBIL.TO is priced at CA$50.03, while XFH.TO trades at CA$34.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XFH.TO's P/E ratio is 16.73. In terms of profitability, CBIL.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XFH.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CBIL.TO is less volatile compared to XFH.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBIL.TO.Check XFH.TO's competition here
CBIL.TO vs XFN.TO Comparison August 2025
CBIL.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBIL.TO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, XFN.TO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CBIL.TO is priced at CA$50.03, while XFN.TO trades at CA$66.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XFN.TO's P/E ratio is 17.10. In terms of profitability, CBIL.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XFN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CBIL.TO is less volatile compared to XFN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBIL.TO.Check XFN.TO's competition here
CBIL.TO vs CYB.TO Comparison August 2025
CBIL.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBIL.TO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CYB.TO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CBIL.TO is priced at CA$50.03, while CYB.TO trades at CA$81.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CYB.TO's P/E ratio is 11.10. In terms of profitability, CBIL.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CYB.TO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CBIL.TO is less volatile compared to CYB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBIL.TO.Check CYB.TO's competition here
CBIL.TO vs ISIF.TO Comparison August 2025
CBIL.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBIL.TO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ISIF.TO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CBIL.TO is priced at CA$50.03, while ISIF.TO trades at CA$12.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ISIF.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CBIL.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ISIF.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CBIL.TO is more volatile compared to ISIF.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBIL.TO.Check ISIF.TO's competition here
CBIL.TO vs ZWC.TO Comparison August 2025
CBIL.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBIL.TO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ZWC.TO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CBIL.TO is priced at CA$50.03, while ZWC.TO trades at CA$18.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZWC.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CBIL.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZWC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CBIL.TO is less volatile compared to ZWC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBIL.TO.Check ZWC.TO's competition here
CBIL.TO vs HXCN.TO Comparison August 2025
CBIL.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBIL.TO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, HXCN.TO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CBIL.TO is priced at CA$50.03, while HXCN.TO trades at CA$46.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HXCN.TO's P/E ratio is 20.00. In terms of profitability, CBIL.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HXCN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CBIL.TO is less volatile compared to HXCN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBIL.TO.Check HXCN.TO's competition here
CBIL.TO vs XSH.TO Comparison August 2025
CBIL.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBIL.TO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, XSH.TO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CBIL.TO is priced at CA$50.03, while XSH.TO trades at CA$19.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XSH.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CBIL.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XSH.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CBIL.TO is less volatile compared to XSH.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBIL.TO.Check XSH.TO's competition here
CBIL.TO vs XGB.TO Comparison August 2025
CBIL.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBIL.TO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, XGB.TO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CBIL.TO is priced at CA$50.03, while XGB.TO trades at CA$19.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XGB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CBIL.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XGB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CBIL.TO is less volatile compared to XGB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBIL.TO.Check XGB.TO's competition here
CBIL.TO vs UNC.TO Comparison August 2025
CBIL.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBIL.TO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, UNC.TO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CBIL.TO is priced at CA$50.03, while UNC.TO trades at CA$14.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UNC.TO's P/E ratio is 6.91. In terms of profitability, CBIL.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UNC.TO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CBIL.TO is less volatile compared to UNC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBIL.TO.Check UNC.TO's competition here
CBIL.TO vs ZEM.TO Comparison August 2025
CBIL.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBIL.TO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ZEM.TO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CBIL.TO is priced at CA$50.03, while ZEM.TO trades at CA$24.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZEM.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CBIL.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZEM.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CBIL.TO is less volatile compared to ZEM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBIL.TO.Check ZEM.TO's competition here
CBIL.TO vs HMAX.TO Comparison August 2025
CBIL.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBIL.TO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, HMAX.TO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CBIL.TO is priced at CA$50.03, while HMAX.TO trades at CA$14.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HMAX.TO's P/E ratio is 15.30. In terms of profitability, CBIL.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HMAX.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CBIL.TO is less volatile compared to HMAX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBIL.TO.Check HMAX.TO's competition here
CBIL.TO vs ZGB.TO Comparison August 2025
CBIL.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBIL.TO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ZGB.TO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CBIL.TO is priced at CA$50.03, while ZGB.TO trades at CA$45.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZGB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CBIL.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZGB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CBIL.TO is less volatile compared to ZGB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBIL.TO.Check ZGB.TO's competition here
CBIL.TO vs ZPR.TO Comparison August 2025
CBIL.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBIL.TO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ZPR.TO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CBIL.TO is priced at CA$50.03, while ZPR.TO trades at CA$11.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZPR.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CBIL.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZPR.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CBIL.TO is less volatile compared to ZPR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBIL.TO.Check ZPR.TO's competition here
CBIL.TO vs EQL.TO Comparison August 2025
CBIL.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBIL.TO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, EQL.TO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CBIL.TO is priced at CA$50.03, while EQL.TO trades at CA$38.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EQL.TO's P/E ratio is 22.26. In terms of profitability, CBIL.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EQL.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CBIL.TO is less volatile compared to EQL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBIL.TO.Check EQL.TO's competition here
CBIL.TO vs FCUV.TO Comparison August 2025
CBIL.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBIL.TO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, FCUV.TO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CBIL.TO is priced at CA$50.03, while FCUV.TO trades at CA$20.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FCUV.TO's P/E ratio is 17.14. In terms of profitability, CBIL.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FCUV.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CBIL.TO is less volatile compared to FCUV.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBIL.TO.Check FCUV.TO's competition here
CBIL.TO vs XWD.TO Comparison August 2025
CBIL.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBIL.TO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, XWD.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CBIL.TO is priced at CA$50.03, while XWD.TO trades at CA$101.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XWD.TO's P/E ratio is 23.68. In terms of profitability, CBIL.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XWD.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CBIL.TO is less volatile compared to XWD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBIL.TO.Check XWD.TO's competition here
CBIL.TO vs RIIN.TO Comparison August 2025
CBIL.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBIL.TO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, RIIN.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CBIL.TO is priced at CA$50.03, while RIIN.TO trades at CA$22.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RIIN.TO's P/E ratio is 20.79. In terms of profitability, CBIL.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RIIN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CBIL.TO is less volatile compared to RIIN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBIL.TO.Check RIIN.TO's competition here
CBIL.TO vs FCUQ.TO Comparison August 2025
CBIL.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBIL.TO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, FCUQ.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CBIL.TO is priced at CA$50.03, while FCUQ.TO trades at CA$65.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FCUQ.TO's P/E ratio is 27.07. In terms of profitability, CBIL.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FCUQ.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CBIL.TO is less volatile compared to FCUQ.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBIL.TO.Check FCUQ.TO's competition here
CBIL.TO vs XEG.TO Comparison August 2025
CBIL.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBIL.TO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, XEG.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CBIL.TO is priced at CA$50.03, while XEG.TO trades at CA$17.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XEG.TO's P/E ratio is 11.59. In terms of profitability, CBIL.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XEG.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CBIL.TO is less volatile compared to XEG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBIL.TO.Check XEG.TO's competition here
CBIL.TO vs VUS.TO Comparison August 2025
CBIL.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBIL.TO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, VUS.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CBIL.TO is priced at CA$50.03, while VUS.TO trades at CA$108.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VUS.TO's P/E ratio is 26.47. In terms of profitability, CBIL.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VUS.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CBIL.TO is less volatile compared to VUS.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBIL.TO.Check VUS.TO's competition here
CBIL.TO vs ZUQ.TO Comparison August 2025
CBIL.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBIL.TO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ZUQ.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CBIL.TO is priced at CA$50.03, while ZUQ.TO trades at CA$89.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZUQ.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CBIL.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZUQ.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CBIL.TO is less volatile compared to ZUQ.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBIL.TO.Check ZUQ.TO's competition here
CBIL.TO vs DCU.TO Comparison August 2025
CBIL.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBIL.TO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, DCU.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CBIL.TO is priced at CA$50.03, while DCU.TO trades at CA$17.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DCU.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CBIL.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DCU.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CBIL.TO is more volatile compared to DCU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBIL.TO.Check DCU.TO's competition here
CBIL.TO vs ZDV.TO Comparison August 2025
CBIL.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBIL.TO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ZDV.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CBIL.TO is priced at CA$50.03, while ZDV.TO trades at CA$24.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZDV.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CBIL.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZDV.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CBIL.TO is less volatile compared to ZDV.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBIL.TO.Check ZDV.TO's competition here
CBIL.TO vs QDX.TO Comparison August 2025
CBIL.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBIL.TO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, QDX.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CBIL.TO is priced at CA$50.03, while QDX.TO trades at CA$133.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QDX.TO's P/E ratio is 16.72. In terms of profitability, CBIL.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to QDX.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CBIL.TO is less volatile compared to QDX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBIL.TO.Check QDX.TO's competition here
CBIL.TO vs ZDM.TO Comparison August 2025
CBIL.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBIL.TO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ZDM.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CBIL.TO is priced at CA$50.03, while ZDM.TO trades at CA$31.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZDM.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CBIL.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZDM.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CBIL.TO is less volatile compared to ZDM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBIL.TO.Check ZDM.TO's competition here
CBIL.TO vs BND.TO Comparison August 2025
CBIL.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBIL.TO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, BND.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CBIL.TO is priced at CA$50.03, while BND.TO trades at CA$17.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBIL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BND.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CBIL.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BND.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CBIL.TO is more volatile compared to BND.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBIL.TO.Check BND.TO's competition here