ACC Aviation Holdings Ltd.
ACC Aviation Holdings Ltd. CAVG Peers
See (CAVG) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Shell Companies Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAVG | $0.10 | N/A | 1.3M | -3.33 | -$0.03 | N/A |
| QMIS | $0.25 | N/A | 30.5B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| GSHN | $22.70 | +2.71% | 9.3B | -2270.00 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| KATX | $1.05 | N/A | 1.9B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| CCYC | $11.25 | N/A | 1.7B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| ZSYC | $2.00 | N/A | 1B | -2.12 | -$0.95 | N/A |
| WCHS | $6.60 | +31.74% | 700.7M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| WPCBF | $0.00 | +100.00% | 700.3M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| NOTR | $13.00 | N/A | 570.9M | -433.33 | -$0.03 | N/A |
| DVTC | $9.00 | -1.67% | 490.5M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Stock Comparison
CAVG vs QMIS Comparison
CAVG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAVG stands at 1.3M. In comparison, QMIS has a market cap of 30.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CAVG is priced at $0.10, while QMIS trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAVG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.33, whereas QMIS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAVG's ROE is +1.60%, compared to QMIS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CAVG and QMIS have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CAVG vs GSHN Comparison
CAVG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAVG stands at 1.3M. In comparison, GSHN has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CAVG is priced at $0.10, while GSHN trades at $22.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAVG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.33, whereas GSHN's P/E ratio is -2270.00. In terms of profitability, CAVG's ROE is +1.60%, compared to GSHN's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAVG and GSHN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CAVG vs KATX Comparison
CAVG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAVG stands at 1.3M. In comparison, KATX has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CAVG is priced at $0.10, while KATX trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAVG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.33, whereas KATX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAVG's ROE is +1.60%, compared to KATX's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CAVG is less volatile compared to KATX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAVG.
CAVG vs CCYC Comparison
CAVG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAVG stands at 1.3M. In comparison, CCYC has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CAVG is priced at $0.10, while CCYC trades at $11.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAVG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.33, whereas CCYC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAVG's ROE is +1.60%, compared to CCYC's ROE of +1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CAVG and CCYC have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CAVG vs ZSYC Comparison
CAVG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAVG stands at 1.3M. In comparison, ZSYC has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, CAVG is priced at $0.10, while ZSYC trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAVG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.33, whereas ZSYC's P/E ratio is -2.12. In terms of profitability, CAVG's ROE is +1.60%, compared to ZSYC's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CAVG is less volatile compared to ZSYC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAVG.
CAVG vs WCHS Comparison
CAVG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAVG stands at 1.3M. In comparison, WCHS has a market cap of 700.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CAVG is priced at $0.10, while WCHS trades at $6.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAVG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.33, whereas WCHS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAVG's ROE is +1.60%, compared to WCHS's ROE of +0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, CAVG and WCHS have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CAVG vs WPCBF Comparison
CAVG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAVG stands at 1.3M. In comparison, WPCBF has a market cap of 700.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CAVG is priced at $0.10, while WPCBF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAVG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.33, whereas WPCBF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAVG's ROE is +1.60%, compared to WPCBF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAVG and WPCBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CAVG vs NOTR Comparison
CAVG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAVG stands at 1.3M. In comparison, NOTR has a market cap of 570.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CAVG is priced at $0.10, while NOTR trades at $13.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAVG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.33, whereas NOTR's P/E ratio is -433.33. In terms of profitability, CAVG's ROE is +1.60%, compared to NOTR's ROE of -65.90%. Regarding short-term risk, CAVG is less volatile compared to NOTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAVG.
CAVG vs DVTC Comparison
CAVG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAVG stands at 1.3M. In comparison, DVTC has a market cap of 490.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CAVG is priced at $0.10, while DVTC trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAVG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.33, whereas DVTC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAVG's ROE is +1.60%, compared to DVTC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CAVG is less volatile compared to DVTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAVG.
CAVG vs FZRO Comparison
CAVG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAVG stands at 1.3M. In comparison, FZRO has a market cap of 346.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CAVG is priced at $0.10, while FZRO trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAVG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.33, whereas FZRO's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, CAVG's ROE is +1.60%, compared to FZRO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAVG and FZRO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CAVG vs RGLG Comparison
CAVG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAVG stands at 1.3M. In comparison, RGLG has a market cap of 342.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CAVG is priced at $0.10, while RGLG trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAVG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.33, whereas RGLG's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, CAVG's ROE is +1.60%, compared to RGLG's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CAVG is less volatile compared to RGLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAVG.
CAVG vs CINV Comparison
CAVG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAVG stands at 1.3M. In comparison, CINV has a market cap of 338.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CAVG is priced at $0.10, while CINV trades at $4.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAVG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.33, whereas CINV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAVG's ROE is +1.60%, compared to CINV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAVG and CINV have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CAVG vs AMRR Comparison
CAVG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAVG stands at 1.3M. In comparison, AMRR has a market cap of 250.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CAVG is priced at $0.10, while AMRR trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAVG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.33, whereas AMRR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAVG's ROE is +1.60%, compared to AMRR's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, CAVG and AMRR have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CAVG vs BTOW Comparison
CAVG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAVG stands at 1.3M. In comparison, BTOW has a market cap of 192.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CAVG is priced at $0.10, while BTOW trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAVG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.33, whereas BTOW's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, CAVG's ROE is +1.60%, compared to BTOW's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CAVG and BTOW have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CAVG vs KAST Comparison
CAVG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAVG stands at 1.3M. In comparison, KAST has a market cap of 164.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CAVG is priced at $0.10, while KAST trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAVG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.33, whereas KAST's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAVG's ROE is +1.60%, compared to KAST's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CAVG is less volatile compared to KAST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAVG.
CAVG vs SCGX Comparison
CAVG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAVG stands at 1.3M. In comparison, SCGX has a market cap of 146.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CAVG is priced at $0.10, while SCGX trades at $8.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAVG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.33, whereas SCGX's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CAVG's ROE is +1.60%, compared to SCGX's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, CAVG and SCGX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CAVG vs TRFE Comparison
CAVG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAVG stands at 1.3M. In comparison, TRFE has a market cap of 101M. Regarding current trading prices, CAVG is priced at $0.10, while TRFE trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAVG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.33, whereas TRFE's P/E ratio is -1.92. In terms of profitability, CAVG's ROE is +1.60%, compared to TRFE's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CAVG and TRFE have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CAVG vs DSAQW Comparison
CAVG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAVG stands at 1.3M. In comparison, DSAQW has a market cap of 98.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CAVG is priced at $0.10, while DSAQW trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAVG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.33, whereas DSAQW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAVG's ROE is +1.60%, compared to DSAQW's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CAVG is less volatile compared to DSAQW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAVG.
CAVG vs NMTT Comparison
CAVG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAVG stands at 1.3M. In comparison, NMTT has a market cap of 90.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CAVG is priced at $0.10, while NMTT trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAVG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.33, whereas NMTT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAVG's ROE is +1.60%, compared to NMTT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CAVG and NMTT have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CAVG vs RMGCF Comparison
CAVG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAVG stands at 1.3M. In comparison, RMGCF has a market cap of 89.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CAVG is priced at $0.10, while RMGCF trades at $7.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAVG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.33, whereas RMGCF's P/E ratio is -14.41. In terms of profitability, CAVG's ROE is +1.60%, compared to RMGCF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CAVG is less volatile compared to RMGCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAVG.
CAVG vs ATAQF Comparison
CAVG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAVG stands at 1.3M. In comparison, ATAQF has a market cap of 82.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CAVG is priced at $0.10, while ATAQF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAVG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.33, whereas ATAQF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAVG's ROE is +1.60%, compared to ATAQF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CAVG is less volatile compared to ATAQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAVG.
CAVG vs WWHC Comparison
CAVG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAVG stands at 1.3M. In comparison, WWHC has a market cap of 80.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CAVG is priced at $0.10, while WWHC trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAVG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.33, whereas WWHC's P/E ratio is -2.11. In terms of profitability, CAVG's ROE is +1.60%, compared to WWHC's ROE of +1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CAVG and WWHC have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CAVG vs CHAAW Comparison
CAVG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAVG stands at 1.3M. In comparison, CHAAW has a market cap of 77.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CAVG is priced at $0.10, while CHAAW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAVG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.33, whereas CHAAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAVG's ROE is +1.60%, compared to CHAAW's ROE of -2.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CAVG and CHAAW have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CAVG vs CMCAF Comparison
CAVG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAVG stands at 1.3M. In comparison, CMCAF has a market cap of 76.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CAVG is priced at $0.10, while CMCAF trades at $11.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAVG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.33, whereas CMCAF's P/E ratio is 60.00. In terms of profitability, CAVG's ROE is +1.60%, compared to CMCAF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CAVG and CMCAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CAVG vs XITO Comparison
CAVG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAVG stands at 1.3M. In comparison, XITO has a market cap of 76M. Regarding current trading prices, CAVG is priced at $0.10, while XITO trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAVG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.33, whereas XITO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAVG's ROE is +1.60%, compared to XITO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CAVG is less volatile compared to XITO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAVG.
CAVG vs TGLO Comparison
CAVG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAVG stands at 1.3M. In comparison, TGLO has a market cap of 75.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CAVG is priced at $0.10, while TGLO trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAVG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.33, whereas TGLO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAVG's ROE is +1.60%, compared to TGLO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CAVG is less volatile compared to TGLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAVG.
CAVG vs CREEF Comparison
CAVG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAVG stands at 1.3M. In comparison, CREEF has a market cap of 75M. Regarding current trading prices, CAVG is priced at $0.10, while CREEF trades at $10.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAVG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.33, whereas CREEF's P/E ratio is 36.47. In terms of profitability, CAVG's ROE is +1.60%, compared to CREEF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CAVG is less volatile compared to CREEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAVG.
CAVG vs WAYS Comparison
CAVG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAVG stands at 1.3M. In comparison, WAYS has a market cap of 69.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CAVG is priced at $0.10, while WAYS trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAVG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.33, whereas WAYS's P/E ratio is -40.00. In terms of profitability, CAVG's ROE is +1.60%, compared to WAYS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAVG is less volatile compared to WAYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAVG.
CAVG vs PTCP Comparison
CAVG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAVG stands at 1.3M. In comparison, PTCP has a market cap of 56.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CAVG is priced at $0.10, while PTCP trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAVG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.33, whereas PTCP's P/E ratio is -27.78. In terms of profitability, CAVG's ROE is +1.60%, compared to PTCP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CAVG and PTCP have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CAVG vs SSHT Comparison
CAVG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAVG stands at 1.3M. In comparison, SSHT has a market cap of 56M. Regarding current trading prices, CAVG is priced at $0.10, while SSHT trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAVG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.33, whereas SSHT's P/E ratio is -17.00. In terms of profitability, CAVG's ROE is +1.60%, compared to SSHT's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CAVG is less volatile compared to SSHT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAVG.
CAVG vs ATMS Comparison
CAVG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAVG stands at 1.3M. In comparison, ATMS has a market cap of 55.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CAVG is priced at $0.10, while ATMS trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAVG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.33, whereas ATMS's P/E ratio is -8.30. In terms of profitability, CAVG's ROE is +1.60%, compared to ATMS's ROE of +1.78%. Regarding short-term risk, CAVG and ATMS have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CAVG vs CAHO Comparison
CAVG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAVG stands at 1.3M. In comparison, CAHO has a market cap of 55.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CAVG is priced at $0.10, while CAHO trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAVG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.33, whereas CAHO's P/E ratio is -150.00. In terms of profitability, CAVG's ROE is +1.60%, compared to CAHO's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, CAVG and CAHO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CAVG vs MDWK Comparison
CAVG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAVG stands at 1.3M. In comparison, MDWK has a market cap of 55.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CAVG is priced at $0.10, while MDWK trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAVG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.33, whereas MDWK's P/E ratio is -24.98. In terms of profitability, CAVG's ROE is +1.60%, compared to MDWK's ROE of -1.94%. Regarding short-term risk, CAVG and MDWK have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CAVG vs AASP Comparison
CAVG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAVG stands at 1.3M. In comparison, AASP has a market cap of 49.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CAVG is priced at $0.10, while AASP trades at $5.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAVG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.33, whereas AASP's P/E ratio is -17.55. In terms of profitability, CAVG's ROE is +1.60%, compared to AASP's ROE of -2.70%. Regarding short-term risk, CAVG is less volatile compared to AASP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAVG.
CAVG vs AVNI Comparison
CAVG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAVG stands at 1.3M. In comparison, AVNI has a market cap of 48.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CAVG is priced at $0.10, while AVNI trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAVG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.33, whereas AVNI's P/E ratio is -45.00. In terms of profitability, CAVG's ROE is +1.60%, compared to AVNI's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, CAVG is less volatile compared to AVNI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAVG.
CAVG vs JMTM Comparison
CAVG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAVG stands at 1.3M. In comparison, JMTM has a market cap of 48M. Regarding current trading prices, CAVG is priced at $0.10, while JMTM trades at $5.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAVG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.33, whereas JMTM's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, CAVG's ROE is +1.60%, compared to JMTM's ROE of +4.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CAVG is less volatile compared to JMTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAVG.
CAVG vs KWAC Comparison
CAVG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAVG stands at 1.3M. In comparison, KWAC has a market cap of 46.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CAVG is priced at $0.10, while KWAC trades at $13.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAVG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.33, whereas KWAC's P/E ratio is -23.75. In terms of profitability, CAVG's ROE is +1.60%, compared to KWAC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CAVG and KWAC have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CAVG vs KWACW Comparison
CAVG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAVG stands at 1.3M. In comparison, KWACW has a market cap of 46.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CAVG is priced at $0.10, while KWACW trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAVG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.33, whereas KWACW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAVG's ROE is +1.60%, compared to KWACW's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CAVG and KWACW have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CAVG vs AWCA Comparison
CAVG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAVG stands at 1.3M. In comparison, AWCA has a market cap of 42.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CAVG is priced at $0.10, while AWCA trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAVG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.33, whereas AWCA's P/E ratio is -11.00. In terms of profitability, CAVG's ROE is +1.60%, compared to AWCA's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, CAVG is less volatile compared to AWCA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAVG.
CAVG vs XTPT Comparison
CAVG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAVG stands at 1.3M. In comparison, XTPT has a market cap of 40.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CAVG is priced at $0.10, while XTPT trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAVG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.33, whereas XTPT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAVG's ROE is +1.60%, compared to XTPT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAVG is less volatile compared to XTPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAVG.
CAVG vs FDHC Comparison
CAVG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAVG stands at 1.3M. In comparison, FDHC has a market cap of 37.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CAVG is priced at $0.10, while FDHC trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAVG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.33, whereas FDHC's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, CAVG's ROE is +1.60%, compared to FDHC's ROE of -2.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CAVG is less volatile compared to FDHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAVG.
CAVG vs WBQNL Comparison
CAVG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAVG stands at 1.3M. In comparison, WBQNL has a market cap of 37.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CAVG is priced at $0.10, while WBQNL trades at $3.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAVG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.33, whereas WBQNL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAVG's ROE is +1.60%, compared to WBQNL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAVG and WBQNL have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CAVG vs GWIN Comparison
CAVG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAVG stands at 1.3M. In comparison, GWIN has a market cap of 36.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CAVG is priced at $0.10, while GWIN trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAVG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.33, whereas GWIN's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, CAVG's ROE is +1.60%, compared to GWIN's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CAVG and GWIN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CAVG vs CNXX Comparison
CAVG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAVG stands at 1.3M. In comparison, CNXX has a market cap of 34.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CAVG is priced at $0.10, while CNXX trades at $1.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAVG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.33, whereas CNXX's P/E ratio is -8.67. In terms of profitability, CAVG's ROE is +1.60%, compared to CNXX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAVG and CNXX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CAVG vs CNWHF Comparison
CAVG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAVG stands at 1.3M. In comparison, CNWHF has a market cap of 31.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CAVG is priced at $0.10, while CNWHF trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAVG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.33, whereas CNWHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAVG's ROE is +1.60%, compared to CNWHF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CAVG is less volatile compared to CNWHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAVG.
CAVG vs OOGI Comparison
CAVG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAVG stands at 1.3M. In comparison, OOGI has a market cap of 29.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CAVG is priced at $0.10, while OOGI trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAVG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.33, whereas OOGI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAVG's ROE is +1.60%, compared to OOGI's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, CAVG is less volatile compared to OOGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAVG.
CAVG vs IDIG Comparison
CAVG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAVG stands at 1.3M. In comparison, IDIG has a market cap of 26.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CAVG is priced at $0.10, while IDIG trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAVG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.33, whereas IDIG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAVG's ROE is +1.60%, compared to IDIG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CAVG and IDIG have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CAVG vs NPFC Comparison
CAVG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAVG stands at 1.3M. In comparison, NPFC has a market cap of 23.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CAVG is priced at $0.10, while NPFC trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAVG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.33, whereas NPFC's P/E ratio is -17.86. In terms of profitability, CAVG's ROE is +1.60%, compared to NPFC's ROE of +1.75%. Regarding short-term risk, CAVG and NPFC have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CAVG vs AGSS Comparison
CAVG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAVG stands at 1.3M. In comparison, AGSS has a market cap of 23.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CAVG is priced at $0.10, while AGSS trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAVG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.33, whereas AGSS's P/E ratio is -8.17. In terms of profitability, CAVG's ROE is +1.60%, compared to AGSS's ROE of +1.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CAVG is less volatile compared to AGSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAVG.
CAVG vs CBBB Comparison
CAVG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAVG stands at 1.3M. In comparison, CBBB has a market cap of 22.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CAVG is priced at $0.10, while CBBB trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAVG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.33, whereas CBBB's P/E ratio is -0.87. In terms of profitability, CAVG's ROE is +1.60%, compared to CBBB's ROE of +10.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CAVG is less volatile compared to CBBB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAVG.
CAVG vs ADCV Comparison
CAVG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAVG stands at 1.3M. In comparison, ADCV has a market cap of 22M. Regarding current trading prices, CAVG is priced at $0.10, while ADCV trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAVG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.33, whereas ADCV's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, CAVG's ROE is +1.60%, compared to ADCV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CAVG and ADCV have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CAVG vs EVTK Comparison
CAVG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAVG stands at 1.3M. In comparison, EVTK has a market cap of 21.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CAVG is priced at $0.10, while EVTK trades at $5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAVG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.33, whereas EVTK's P/E ratio is -510.00. In terms of profitability, CAVG's ROE is +1.60%, compared to EVTK's ROE of +1.52%. Regarding short-term risk, CAVG is less volatile compared to EVTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAVG.
CAVG vs PSCO Comparison
CAVG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAVG stands at 1.3M. In comparison, PSCO has a market cap of 20M. Regarding current trading prices, CAVG is priced at $0.10, while PSCO trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAVG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.33, whereas PSCO's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, CAVG's ROE is +1.60%, compared to PSCO's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, CAVG and PSCO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CAVG vs GTVI Comparison
CAVG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAVG stands at 1.3M. In comparison, GTVI has a market cap of 15.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CAVG is priced at $0.10, while GTVI trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAVG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.33, whereas GTVI's P/E ratio is -3.65. In terms of profitability, CAVG's ROE is +1.60%, compared to GTVI's ROE of +1.43%. Regarding short-term risk, CAVG and GTVI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CAVG vs BOREF Comparison
CAVG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAVG stands at 1.3M. In comparison, BOREF has a market cap of 15M. Regarding current trading prices, CAVG is priced at $0.10, while BOREF trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAVG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.33, whereas BOREF's P/E ratio is -33.33. In terms of profitability, CAVG's ROE is +1.60%, compared to BOREF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CAVG and BOREF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CAVG vs UGHB Comparison
CAVG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAVG stands at 1.3M. In comparison, UGHB has a market cap of 14.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CAVG is priced at $0.10, while UGHB trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAVG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.33, whereas UGHB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAVG's ROE is +1.60%, compared to UGHB's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CAVG is less volatile compared to UGHB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAVG.
CAVG vs ACBD Comparison
CAVG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAVG stands at 1.3M. In comparison, ACBD has a market cap of 14.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CAVG is priced at $0.10, while ACBD trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAVG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.33, whereas ACBD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAVG's ROE is +1.60%, compared to ACBD's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, CAVG and ACBD have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CAVG vs STLY Comparison
CAVG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAVG stands at 1.3M. In comparison, STLY has a market cap of 14.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CAVG is priced at $0.10, while STLY trades at $6.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAVG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.33, whereas STLY's P/E ratio is -33.44. In terms of profitability, CAVG's ROE is +1.60%, compared to STLY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CAVG and STLY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CAVG vs ECGR Comparison
CAVG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAVG stands at 1.3M. In comparison, ECGR has a market cap of 13.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CAVG is priced at $0.10, while ECGR trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAVG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.33, whereas ECGR's P/E ratio is -20.00. In terms of profitability, CAVG's ROE is +1.60%, compared to ECGR's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CAVG is less volatile compared to ECGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAVG.
CAVG vs USBL Comparison
CAVG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAVG stands at 1.3M. In comparison, USBL has a market cap of 13.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CAVG is priced at $0.10, while USBL trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAVG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.33, whereas USBL's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, CAVG's ROE is +1.60%, compared to USBL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CAVG is less volatile compared to USBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAVG.
CAVG vs AOAO Comparison
CAVG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAVG stands at 1.3M. In comparison, AOAO has a market cap of 13.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CAVG is priced at $0.10, while AOAO trades at $1.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAVG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.33, whereas AOAO's P/E ratio is -1.22. In terms of profitability, CAVG's ROE is +1.60%, compared to AOAO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAVG and AOAO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CAVG vs ELLH Comparison
CAVG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAVG stands at 1.3M. In comparison, ELLH has a market cap of 12.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CAVG is priced at $0.10, while ELLH trades at $17.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAVG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.33, whereas ELLH's P/E ratio is -5.20. In terms of profitability, CAVG's ROE is +1.60%, compared to ELLH's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CAVG and ELLH have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CAVG vs ITRX Comparison
CAVG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAVG stands at 1.3M. In comparison, ITRX has a market cap of 11.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CAVG is priced at $0.10, while ITRX trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAVG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.33, whereas ITRX's P/E ratio is -3.81. In terms of profitability, CAVG's ROE is +1.60%, compared to ITRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CAVG and ITRX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CAVG vs NIHL Comparison
CAVG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAVG stands at 1.3M. In comparison, NIHL has a market cap of 10.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CAVG is priced at $0.10, while NIHL trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAVG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.33, whereas NIHL's P/E ratio is -2.03. In terms of profitability, CAVG's ROE is +1.60%, compared to NIHL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CAVG is less volatile compared to NIHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAVG.
CAVG vs WRPT Comparison
CAVG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAVG stands at 1.3M. In comparison, WRPT has a market cap of 10.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CAVG is priced at $0.10, while WRPT trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAVG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.33, whereas WRPT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAVG's ROE is +1.60%, compared to WRPT's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, CAVG is less volatile compared to WRPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAVG.
CAVG vs AZRH Comparison
CAVG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAVG stands at 1.3M. In comparison, AZRH has a market cap of 9.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CAVG is priced at $0.10, while AZRH trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAVG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.33, whereas AZRH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAVG's ROE is +1.60%, compared to AZRH's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAVG and AZRH have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CAVG vs BDCM Comparison
CAVG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAVG stands at 1.3M. In comparison, BDCM has a market cap of 9.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CAVG is priced at $0.10, while BDCM trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAVG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.33, whereas BDCM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAVG's ROE is +1.60%, compared to BDCM's ROE of +20.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CAVG and BDCM have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CAVG vs SLTN Comparison
CAVG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAVG stands at 1.3M. In comparison, SLTN has a market cap of 9M. Regarding current trading prices, CAVG is priced at $0.10, while SLTN trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAVG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.33, whereas SLTN's P/E ratio is -31.33. In terms of profitability, CAVG's ROE is +1.60%, compared to SLTN's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CAVG and SLTN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CAVG vs LWLW Comparison
CAVG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAVG stands at 1.3M. In comparison, LWLW has a market cap of 8.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CAVG is priced at $0.10, while LWLW trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAVG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.33, whereas LWLW's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, CAVG's ROE is +1.60%, compared to LWLW's ROE of -3.87%. Regarding short-term risk, CAVG and LWLW have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CAVG vs GIPL Comparison
CAVG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAVG stands at 1.3M. In comparison, GIPL has a market cap of 7.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CAVG is priced at $0.10, while GIPL trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAVG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.33, whereas GIPL's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, CAVG's ROE is +1.60%, compared to GIPL's ROE of +3391.68%. Regarding short-term risk, CAVG is less volatile compared to GIPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAVG.
CAVG vs PCMC Comparison
CAVG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAVG stands at 1.3M. In comparison, PCMC has a market cap of 7.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CAVG is priced at $0.10, while PCMC trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAVG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.33, whereas PCMC's P/E ratio is -1.04. In terms of profitability, CAVG's ROE is +1.60%, compared to PCMC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CAVG and PCMC have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CAVG vs GFOO Comparison
CAVG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAVG stands at 1.3M. In comparison, GFOO has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CAVG is priced at $0.10, while GFOO trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAVG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.33, whereas GFOO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAVG's ROE is +1.60%, compared to GFOO's ROE of +42.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CAVG and GFOO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CAVG vs ADIA Comparison
CAVG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAVG stands at 1.3M. In comparison, ADIA has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CAVG is priced at $0.10, while ADIA trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAVG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.33, whereas ADIA's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, CAVG's ROE is +1.60%, compared to ADIA's ROE of +1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAVG is less volatile compared to ADIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAVG.
CAVG vs NGRC Comparison
CAVG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAVG stands at 1.3M. In comparison, NGRC has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CAVG is priced at $0.10, while NGRC trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAVG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.33, whereas NGRC's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, CAVG's ROE is +1.60%, compared to NGRC's ROE of +1.72%. Regarding short-term risk, CAVG and NGRC have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CAVG vs FUNR Comparison
CAVG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAVG stands at 1.3M. In comparison, FUNR has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CAVG is priced at $0.10, while FUNR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAVG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.33, whereas FUNR's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, CAVG's ROE is +1.60%, compared to FUNR's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CAVG and FUNR have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CAVG vs XCPT Comparison
CAVG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAVG stands at 1.3M. In comparison, XCPT has a market cap of 5.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CAVG is priced at $0.10, while XCPT trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAVG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.33, whereas XCPT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAVG's ROE is +1.60%, compared to XCPT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CAVG and XCPT have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CAVG vs TCRI Comparison
CAVG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAVG stands at 1.3M. In comparison, TCRI has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CAVG is priced at $0.10, while TCRI trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAVG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.33, whereas TCRI's P/E ratio is -8.15. In terms of profitability, CAVG's ROE is +1.60%, compared to TCRI's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CAVG and TCRI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CAVG vs NRCD Comparison
CAVG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAVG stands at 1.3M. In comparison, NRCD has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CAVG is priced at $0.10, while NRCD trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAVG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.33, whereas NRCD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAVG's ROE is +1.60%, compared to NRCD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CAVG and NRCD have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CAVG vs WHLT Comparison
CAVG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAVG stands at 1.3M. In comparison, WHLT has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, CAVG is priced at $0.10, while WHLT trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAVG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.33, whereas WHLT's P/E ratio is 8.00. In terms of profitability, CAVG's ROE is +1.60%, compared to WHLT's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CAVG is less volatile compared to WHLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAVG.
CAVG vs ASNB Comparison
CAVG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAVG stands at 1.3M. In comparison, ASNB has a market cap of 4.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CAVG is priced at $0.10, while ASNB trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAVG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.33, whereas ASNB's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, CAVG's ROE is +1.60%, compared to ASNB's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CAVG is less volatile compared to ASNB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAVG.
CAVG vs LRGR Comparison
CAVG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAVG stands at 1.3M. In comparison, LRGR has a market cap of 4.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CAVG is priced at $0.10, while LRGR trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAVG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.33, whereas LRGR's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, CAVG's ROE is +1.60%, compared to LRGR's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, CAVG is less volatile compared to LRGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAVG.
CAVG vs FSTJ Comparison
CAVG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAVG stands at 1.3M. In comparison, FSTJ has a market cap of 4.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CAVG is priced at $0.10, while FSTJ trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAVG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.33, whereas FSTJ's P/E ratio is -60.00. In terms of profitability, CAVG's ROE is +1.60%, compared to FSTJ's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CAVG and FSTJ have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CAVG vs ARAT Comparison
CAVG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAVG stands at 1.3M. In comparison, ARAT has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CAVG is priced at $0.10, while ARAT trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAVG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.33, whereas ARAT's P/E ratio is -0.61. In terms of profitability, CAVG's ROE is +1.60%, compared to ARAT's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CAVG and ARAT have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CAVG vs MTRI Comparison
CAVG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAVG stands at 1.3M. In comparison, MTRI has a market cap of 4.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CAVG is priced at $0.10, while MTRI trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAVG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.33, whereas MTRI's P/E ratio is 12.50. In terms of profitability, CAVG's ROE is +1.60%, compared to MTRI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CAVG is less volatile compared to MTRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAVG.
CAVG vs SITS Comparison
CAVG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAVG stands at 1.3M. In comparison, SITS has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CAVG is priced at $0.10, while SITS trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAVG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.33, whereas SITS's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, CAVG's ROE is +1.60%, compared to SITS's ROE of -3.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CAVG is less volatile compared to SITS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAVG.
CAVG vs SMPP Comparison
CAVG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAVG stands at 1.3M. In comparison, SMPP has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CAVG is priced at $0.10, while SMPP trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAVG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.33, whereas SMPP's P/E ratio is -0.82. In terms of profitability, CAVG's ROE is +1.60%, compared to SMPP's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CAVG is less volatile compared to SMPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAVG.
CAVG vs CDBT Comparison
CAVG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAVG stands at 1.3M. In comparison, CDBT has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CAVG is priced at $0.10, while CDBT trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAVG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.33, whereas CDBT's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, CAVG's ROE is +1.60%, compared to CDBT's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CAVG is less volatile compared to CDBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAVG.
CAVG vs HKBT Comparison
CAVG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAVG stands at 1.3M. In comparison, HKBT has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, CAVG is priced at $0.10, while HKBT trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAVG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.33, whereas HKBT's P/E ratio is 0.23. In terms of profitability, CAVG's ROE is +1.60%, compared to HKBT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAVG is less volatile compared to HKBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAVG.
CAVG vs ETER Comparison
CAVG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAVG stands at 1.3M. In comparison, ETER has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, CAVG is priced at $0.10, while ETER trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAVG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.33, whereas ETER's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAVG's ROE is +1.60%, compared to ETER's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CAVG and ETER have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CAVG vs WNFT Comparison
CAVG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAVG stands at 1.3M. In comparison, WNFT has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, CAVG is priced at $0.10, while WNFT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAVG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.33, whereas WNFT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAVG's ROE is +1.60%, compared to WNFT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CAVG is less volatile compared to WNFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAVG.
CAVG vs OHCS Comparison
CAVG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAVG stands at 1.3M. In comparison, OHCS has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, CAVG is priced at $0.10, while OHCS trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAVG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.33, whereas OHCS's P/E ratio is -0.46. In terms of profitability, CAVG's ROE is +1.60%, compared to OHCS's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, CAVG and OHCS have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CAVG vs XSVT Comparison
CAVG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAVG stands at 1.3M. In comparison, XSVT has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CAVG is priced at $0.10, while XSVT trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAVG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.33, whereas XSVT's P/E ratio is -1.24. In terms of profitability, CAVG's ROE is +1.60%, compared to XSVT's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, CAVG and XSVT have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CAVG vs AVVH Comparison
CAVG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAVG stands at 1.3M. In comparison, AVVH has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CAVG is priced at $0.10, while AVVH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAVG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.33, whereas AVVH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAVG's ROE is +1.60%, compared to AVVH's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, CAVG and AVVH have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CAVG vs GDVM Comparison
CAVG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAVG stands at 1.3M. In comparison, GDVM has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CAVG is priced at $0.10, while GDVM trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAVG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.33, whereas GDVM's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, CAVG's ROE is +1.60%, compared to GDVM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CAVG is less volatile compared to GDVM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAVG.
CAVG vs FORW Comparison
CAVG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAVG stands at 1.3M. In comparison, FORW has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CAVG is priced at $0.10, while FORW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAVG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.33, whereas FORW's P/E ratio is -6.70. In terms of profitability, CAVG's ROE is +1.60%, compared to FORW's ROE of +1.66%. Regarding short-term risk, CAVG is less volatile compared to FORW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAVG.
CAVG vs HPIL Comparison
CAVG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAVG stands at 1.3M. In comparison, HPIL has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CAVG is priced at $0.10, while HPIL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAVG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.33, whereas HPIL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAVG's ROE is +1.60%, compared to HPIL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAVG is less volatile compared to HPIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAVG.
CAVG vs ENGA Comparison
CAVG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAVG stands at 1.3M. In comparison, ENGA has a market cap of 3.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CAVG is priced at $0.10, while ENGA trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAVG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.33, whereas ENGA's P/E ratio is -16.00. In terms of profitability, CAVG's ROE is +1.60%, compared to ENGA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CAVG and ENGA have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CAVG vs FWFW Comparison
CAVG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAVG stands at 1.3M. In comparison, FWFW has a market cap of 3.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CAVG is priced at $0.10, while FWFW trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAVG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.33, whereas FWFW's P/E ratio is 0.95. In terms of profitability, CAVG's ROE is +1.60%, compared to FWFW's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CAVG and FWFW have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CAVG vs CRVH Comparison
CAVG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAVG stands at 1.3M. In comparison, CRVH has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CAVG is priced at $0.10, while CRVH trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAVG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.33, whereas CRVH's P/E ratio is -0.97. In terms of profitability, CAVG's ROE is +1.60%, compared to CRVH's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CAVG is less volatile compared to CRVH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAVG.