Caisse Regionale de Credit Agricole Mutuel Toulouse 31
Caisse Regionale de Credit Agricole Mutuel Toulouse 31 (CAT31.PA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CAT31.PA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Banks - Regional Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAT31.PA | €95.55 | -0.47% | 134.8M | 6.51 | €14.67 | +3.87% |
| BNP.PA | €76.53 | -4.41% | 85.5B | 8.12 | €9.43 | +6.26% |
| ACA.PA | €15.92 | -1.42% | 47.9B | 6.83 | €2.33 | +6.91% |
| GLE.PA | €53.98 | -3.54% | 38.6B | 9.04 | €5.97 | +2.02% |
| KBC.BR | €90.50 | -1.37% | 35.9B | 10.70 | €8.46 | +3.76% |
| XBBDC.MC | €2.44 | +2.52% | 24.6B | 8.41 | €0.29 | +7.85% |
| A5G.IR | €6.58 | -5.32% | 14.1B | 7.08 | €0.93 | +5.62% |
| BIRG.IR | €11.51 | -2.50% | 11.1B | 9.67 | €1.19 | +5.48% |
| BCP.LS | €0.71 | -1.61% | 10.7B | 23.67 | €0.03 | +4.23% |
| VLK.AS | €56.10 | -2.09% | 2.4B | 18.10 | €3.10 | +7.40% |
Stock Comparison
CAT31.PA vs BNP.PA Comparison August 2025
CAT31.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT31.PA stands at 134.8M. In comparison, BNP.PA has a market cap of 85.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT31.PA is priced at €95.55, while BNP.PA trades at €76.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT31.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 6.51, whereas BNP.PA's P/E ratio is 8.12. In terms of profitability, CAT31.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BNP.PA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT31.PA is less volatile compared to BNP.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT31.PA.Check BNP.PA's competition here
CAT31.PA vs ACA.PA Comparison August 2025
CAT31.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT31.PA stands at 134.8M. In comparison, ACA.PA has a market cap of 47.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT31.PA is priced at €95.55, while ACA.PA trades at €15.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT31.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 6.51, whereas ACA.PA's P/E ratio is 6.83. In terms of profitability, CAT31.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ACA.PA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT31.PA is less volatile compared to ACA.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT31.PA.Check ACA.PA's competition here
CAT31.PA vs GLE.PA Comparison August 2025
CAT31.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT31.PA stands at 134.8M. In comparison, GLE.PA has a market cap of 38.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT31.PA is priced at €95.55, while GLE.PA trades at €53.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT31.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 6.51, whereas GLE.PA's P/E ratio is 9.04. In terms of profitability, CAT31.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GLE.PA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT31.PA is less volatile compared to GLE.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT31.PA.Check GLE.PA's competition here
CAT31.PA vs KBC.BR Comparison August 2025
CAT31.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT31.PA stands at 134.8M. In comparison, KBC.BR has a market cap of 35.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT31.PA is priced at €95.55, while KBC.BR trades at €90.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT31.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 6.51, whereas KBC.BR's P/E ratio is 10.70. In terms of profitability, CAT31.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to KBC.BR's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT31.PA is less volatile compared to KBC.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT31.PA.Check KBC.BR's competition here
CAT31.PA vs XBBDC.MC Comparison August 2025
CAT31.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT31.PA stands at 134.8M. In comparison, XBBDC.MC has a market cap of 24.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT31.PA is priced at €95.55, while XBBDC.MC trades at €2.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT31.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 6.51, whereas XBBDC.MC's P/E ratio is 8.41. In terms of profitability, CAT31.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to XBBDC.MC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT31.PA is less volatile compared to XBBDC.MC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT31.PA.Check XBBDC.MC's competition here
CAT31.PA vs A5G.IR Comparison August 2025
CAT31.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT31.PA stands at 134.8M. In comparison, A5G.IR has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT31.PA is priced at €95.55, while A5G.IR trades at €6.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT31.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 6.51, whereas A5G.IR's P/E ratio is 7.08. In terms of profitability, CAT31.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to A5G.IR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT31.PA is less volatile compared to A5G.IR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT31.PA.Check A5G.IR's competition here
CAT31.PA vs BIRG.IR Comparison August 2025
CAT31.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT31.PA stands at 134.8M. In comparison, BIRG.IR has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT31.PA is priced at €95.55, while BIRG.IR trades at €11.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT31.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 6.51, whereas BIRG.IR's P/E ratio is 9.67. In terms of profitability, CAT31.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BIRG.IR's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT31.PA is less volatile compared to BIRG.IR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT31.PA.Check BIRG.IR's competition here
CAT31.PA vs BCP.LS Comparison August 2025
CAT31.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT31.PA stands at 134.8M. In comparison, BCP.LS has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT31.PA is priced at €95.55, while BCP.LS trades at €0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT31.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 6.51, whereas BCP.LS's P/E ratio is 23.67. In terms of profitability, CAT31.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BCP.LS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT31.PA is less volatile compared to BCP.LS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT31.PA.Check BCP.LS's competition here
CAT31.PA vs VLK.AS Comparison August 2025
CAT31.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT31.PA stands at 134.8M. In comparison, VLK.AS has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT31.PA is priced at €95.55, while VLK.AS trades at €56.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT31.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 6.51, whereas VLK.AS's P/E ratio is 18.10. In terms of profitability, CAT31.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to VLK.AS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT31.PA is less volatile compared to VLK.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT31.PA.Check VLK.AS's competition here
CAT31.PA vs IL0A.IR Comparison August 2025
CAT31.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT31.PA stands at 134.8M. In comparison, IL0A.IR has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT31.PA is priced at €95.55, while IL0A.IR trades at €2.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT31.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 6.51, whereas IL0A.IR's P/E ratio is 5.34. In terms of profitability, CAT31.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to IL0A.IR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT31.PA is less volatile compared to IL0A.IR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT31.PA.Check IL0A.IR's competition here
CAT31.PA vs PTSB.IR Comparison August 2025
CAT31.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT31.PA stands at 134.8M. In comparison, PTSB.IR has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT31.PA is priced at €95.55, while PTSB.IR trades at €2.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT31.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 6.51, whereas PTSB.IR's P/E ratio is 9.45. In terms of profitability, CAT31.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PTSB.IR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT31.PA is less volatile compared to PTSB.IR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT31.PA.Check PTSB.IR's competition here
CAT31.PA vs MLCFM.PA Comparison August 2025
CAT31.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT31.PA stands at 134.8M. In comparison, MLCFM.PA has a market cap of 830.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CAT31.PA is priced at €95.55, while MLCFM.PA trades at €1,450.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT31.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 6.51, whereas MLCFM.PA's P/E ratio is 13.68. In terms of profitability, CAT31.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MLCFM.PA's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT31.PA is more volatile compared to MLCFM.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT31.PA.Check MLCFM.PA's competition here
CAT31.PA vs CAF.PA Comparison August 2025
CAT31.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT31.PA stands at 134.8M. In comparison, CAF.PA has a market cap of 648.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CAT31.PA is priced at €95.55, while CAF.PA trades at €81.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT31.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 6.51, whereas CAF.PA's P/E ratio is 10.62. In terms of profitability, CAT31.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CAF.PA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT31.PA is more volatile compared to CAF.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT31.PA.Check CAF.PA's competition here
CAT31.PA vs CRBP2.PA Comparison August 2025
CAT31.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT31.PA stands at 134.8M. In comparison, CRBP2.PA has a market cap of 364.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CAT31.PA is priced at €95.55, while CRBP2.PA trades at €22.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT31.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 6.51, whereas CRBP2.PA's P/E ratio is 6.11. In terms of profitability, CAT31.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CRBP2.PA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT31.PA is more volatile compared to CRBP2.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT31.PA.Check CRBP2.PA's competition here
CAT31.PA vs CNF.PA Comparison August 2025
CAT31.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT31.PA stands at 134.8M. In comparison, CNF.PA has a market cap of 260.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CAT31.PA is priced at €95.55, while CNF.PA trades at €16.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT31.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 6.51, whereas CNF.PA's P/E ratio is 4.65. In terms of profitability, CAT31.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CNF.PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT31.PA is more volatile compared to CNF.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT31.PA.Check CNF.PA's competition here
CAT31.PA vs CIV.PA Comparison August 2025
CAT31.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT31.PA stands at 134.8M. In comparison, CIV.PA has a market cap of 206.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CAT31.PA is priced at €95.55, while CIV.PA trades at €91.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT31.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 6.51, whereas CIV.PA's P/E ratio is 8.62. In terms of profitability, CAT31.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CIV.PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT31.PA is less volatile compared to CIV.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT31.PA.Check CIV.PA's competition here
CAT31.PA vs BNB.BR Comparison August 2025
CAT31.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT31.PA stands at 134.8M. In comparison, BNB.BR has a market cap of 153.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CAT31.PA is priced at €95.55, while BNB.BR trades at €383.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT31.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 6.51, whereas BNB.BR's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, CAT31.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BNB.BR's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT31.PA is less volatile compared to BNB.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT31.PA.Check BNB.BR's competition here
CAT31.PA vs CMO.PA Comparison August 2025
CAT31.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT31.PA stands at 134.8M. In comparison, CMO.PA has a market cap of 152.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CAT31.PA is priced at €95.55, while CMO.PA trades at €95.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT31.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 6.51, whereas CMO.PA's P/E ratio is 7.26. In terms of profitability, CAT31.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CMO.PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT31.PA is less volatile compared to CMO.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT31.PA.Check CMO.PA's competition here
CAT31.PA vs CRAV.PA Comparison August 2025
CAT31.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT31.PA stands at 134.8M. In comparison, CRAV.PA has a market cap of 152.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CAT31.PA is priced at €95.55, while CRAV.PA trades at €126.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT31.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 6.51, whereas CRAV.PA's P/E ratio is 10.87. In terms of profitability, CAT31.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CRAV.PA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT31.PA is more volatile compared to CRAV.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT31.PA.Check CRAV.PA's competition here
CAT31.PA vs CRLA.PA Comparison August 2025
CAT31.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT31.PA stands at 134.8M. In comparison, CRLA.PA has a market cap of 120M. Regarding current trading prices, CAT31.PA is priced at €95.55, while CRLA.PA trades at €67.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT31.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 6.51, whereas CRLA.PA's P/E ratio is 7.33. In terms of profitability, CAT31.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CRLA.PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT31.PA is less volatile compared to CRLA.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT31.PA.Check CRLA.PA's competition here
CAT31.PA vs CCN.PA Comparison August 2025
CAT31.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT31.PA stands at 134.8M. In comparison, CCN.PA has a market cap of 117.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CAT31.PA is priced at €95.55, while CCN.PA trades at €112.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT31.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 6.51, whereas CCN.PA's P/E ratio is 8.53. In terms of profitability, CAT31.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CCN.PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT31.PA is more volatile compared to CCN.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT31.PA.Check CCN.PA's competition here
CAT31.PA vs CRSU.PA Comparison August 2025
CAT31.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT31.PA stands at 134.8M. In comparison, CRSU.PA has a market cap of 110.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CAT31.PA is priced at €95.55, while CRSU.PA trades at €171.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT31.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 6.51, whereas CRSU.PA's P/E ratio is 8.23. In terms of profitability, CAT31.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CRSU.PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT31.PA is less volatile compared to CRSU.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT31.PA.Check CRSU.PA's competition here
CAT31.PA vs CRTO.PA Comparison August 2025
CAT31.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT31.PA stands at 134.8M. In comparison, CRTO.PA has a market cap of 109.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CAT31.PA is priced at €95.55, while CRTO.PA trades at €108.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT31.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 6.51, whereas CRTO.PA's P/E ratio is 10.09. In terms of profitability, CAT31.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CRTO.PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT31.PA is less volatile compared to CRTO.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT31.PA.Check CRTO.PA's competition here
CAT31.PA vs CRLO.PA Comparison August 2025
CAT31.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT31.PA stands at 134.8M. In comparison, CRLO.PA has a market cap of 82.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CAT31.PA is priced at €95.55, while CRLO.PA trades at €82.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT31.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 6.51, whereas CRLO.PA's P/E ratio is 8.35. In terms of profitability, CAT31.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CRLO.PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT31.PA is less volatile compared to CRLO.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT31.PA.Check CRLO.PA's competition here
CAT31.PA vs CRAP.PA Comparison August 2025
CAT31.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT31.PA stands at 134.8M. In comparison, CRAP.PA has a market cap of 76.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CAT31.PA is priced at €95.55, while CRAP.PA trades at €111.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT31.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 6.51, whereas CRAP.PA's P/E ratio is 5.78. In terms of profitability, CAT31.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CRAP.PA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT31.PA is less volatile compared to CRAP.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT31.PA.Check CRAP.PA's competition here
CAT31.PA vs MLGRC.PA Comparison August 2025
CAT31.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT31.PA stands at 134.8M. In comparison, MLGRC.PA has a market cap of 36.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CAT31.PA is priced at €95.55, while MLGRC.PA trades at €15.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT31.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 6.51, whereas MLGRC.PA's P/E ratio is 13.75. In terms of profitability, CAT31.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MLGRC.PA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT31.PA is more volatile compared to MLGRC.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT31.PA.Check MLGRC.PA's competition here
CAT31.PA vs KN.PA Comparison August 2025
CAT31.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAT31.PA stands at 134.8M. In comparison, KN.PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CAT31.PA is priced at €95.55, while KN.PA trades at €4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAT31.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 6.51, whereas KN.PA's P/E ratio is 25.01. In terms of profitability, CAT31.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to KN.PA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT31.PA is more volatile compared to KN.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT31.PA.Check KN.PA's competition here