Caisse Regionale de Credit Agricole Mutuel Toulouse 31

CAT31.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAT31.PA stands at 117.88M. In comparison, BNP.PA has a market cap of 87.54B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT31.PA is priced at $83.10, while BNP.PA trades at $77.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAT31.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.66, whereas BNP.PA's P/E ratio is 8.17. In terms of profitability, CAT31.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BNP.PA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT31.PA is less volatile compared to BNP.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT31.PA.

CAT31.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAT31.PA stands at 117.88M. In comparison, ACA.PA has a market cap of 50.68B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT31.PA is priced at $83.10, while ACA.PA trades at $16.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAT31.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.66, whereas ACA.PA's P/E ratio is 7.98. In terms of profitability, CAT31.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ACA.PA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT31.PA is less volatile compared to ACA.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT31.PA.

CAT31.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAT31.PA stands at 117.88M. In comparison, GLE.PA has a market cap of 32.96B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT31.PA is priced at $83.10, while GLE.PA trades at $46.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAT31.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.66, whereas GLE.PA's P/E ratio is 8.46. In terms of profitability, CAT31.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GLE.PA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT31.PA is less volatile compared to GLE.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT31.PA.

CAT31.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAT31.PA stands at 117.88M. In comparison, KBC.BR has a market cap of 32.53B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT31.PA is priced at $83.10, while KBC.BR trades at $82.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAT31.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.66, whereas KBC.BR's P/E ratio is 9.85. In terms of profitability, CAT31.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to KBC.BR's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT31.PA is less volatile compared to KBC.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT31.PA.

CAT31.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAT31.PA stands at 117.88M. In comparison, XBBDC.MC has a market cap of 23.47B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT31.PA is priced at $83.10, while XBBDC.MC trades at $2.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAT31.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.66, whereas XBBDC.MC's P/E ratio is 9.58. In terms of profitability, CAT31.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to XBBDC.MC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT31.PA is more volatile compared to XBBDC.MC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT31.PA.

CAT31.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAT31.PA stands at 117.88M. In comparison, A5G.IR has a market cap of 14.54B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT31.PA is priced at $83.10, while A5G.IR trades at $6.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAT31.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.66, whereas A5G.IR's P/E ratio is 6.72. In terms of profitability, CAT31.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to A5G.IR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT31.PA is less volatile compared to A5G.IR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT31.PA.

CAT31.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAT31.PA stands at 117.88M. In comparison, BIRG.IR has a market cap of 10.84B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT31.PA is priced at $83.10, while BIRG.IR trades at $11.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAT31.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.66, whereas BIRG.IR's P/E ratio is 7.75. In terms of profitability, CAT31.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BIRG.IR's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT31.PA is less volatile compared to BIRG.IR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT31.PA.

CAT31.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAT31.PA stands at 117.88M. In comparison, BCP.LS has a market cap of 8.91B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT31.PA is priced at $83.10, while BCP.LS trades at $0.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAT31.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.66, whereas BCP.LS's P/E ratio is 9.83. In terms of profitability, CAT31.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BCP.LS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT31.PA is less volatile compared to BCP.LS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT31.PA.

CAT31.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAT31.PA stands at 117.88M. In comparison, VLK.AS has a market cap of 2.39B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT31.PA is priced at $83.10, while VLK.AS trades at $56.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAT31.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.66, whereas VLK.AS's P/E ratio is 18.23. In terms of profitability, CAT31.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to VLK.AS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT31.PA is less volatile compared to VLK.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT31.PA.

CAT31.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAT31.PA stands at 117.88M. In comparison, IL0A.IR has a market cap of 1.28B. Regarding current trading prices, CAT31.PA is priced at $83.10, while IL0A.IR trades at $2.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAT31.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.66, whereas IL0A.IR's P/E ratio is 5.34. In terms of profitability, CAT31.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to IL0A.IR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT31.PA is less volatile compared to IL0A.IR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT31.PA.

CAT31.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAT31.PA stands at 117.88M. In comparison, PTSB.IR has a market cap of 926.49M. Regarding current trading prices, CAT31.PA is priced at $83.10, while PTSB.IR trades at $1.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAT31.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.66, whereas PTSB.IR's P/E ratio is 7.73. In terms of profitability, CAT31.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PTSB.IR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT31.PA is less volatile compared to PTSB.IR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT31.PA.

CAT31.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAT31.PA stands at 117.88M. In comparison, MLCFM.PA has a market cap of 716.25M. Regarding current trading prices, CAT31.PA is priced at $83.10, while MLCFM.PA trades at $1,250.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAT31.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.66, whereas MLCFM.PA's P/E ratio is 12.06. In terms of profitability, CAT31.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MLCFM.PA's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT31.PA is more volatile compared to MLCFM.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT31.PA.

CAT31.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAT31.PA stands at 117.88M. In comparison, CAF.PA has a market cap of 561.36M. Regarding current trading prices, CAT31.PA is priced at $83.10, while CAF.PA trades at $69.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAT31.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.66, whereas CAF.PA's P/E ratio is 10.13. In terms of profitability, CAT31.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CAF.PA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT31.PA is less volatile compared to CAF.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT31.PA.

CAT31.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAT31.PA stands at 117.88M. In comparison, CRBP2.PA has a market cap of 349.69M. Regarding current trading prices, CAT31.PA is priced at $83.10, while CRBP2.PA trades at $21.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAT31.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.66, whereas CRBP2.PA's P/E ratio is 5.86. In terms of profitability, CAT31.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CRBP2.PA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT31.PA is less volatile compared to CRBP2.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT31.PA.

CAT31.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAT31.PA stands at 117.88M. In comparison, CNF.PA has a market cap of 260.55M. Regarding current trading prices, CAT31.PA is priced at $83.10, while CNF.PA trades at $16.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAT31.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.66, whereas CNF.PA's P/E ratio is 4.65. In terms of profitability, CAT31.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CNF.PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT31.PA is less volatile compared to CNF.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT31.PA.

CAT31.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAT31.PA stands at 117.88M. In comparison, CIV.PA has a market cap of 177.18M. Regarding current trading prices, CAT31.PA is priced at $83.10, while CIV.PA trades at $79.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAT31.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.66, whereas CIV.PA's P/E ratio is 7.40. In terms of profitability, CAT31.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CIV.PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT31.PA is less volatile compared to CIV.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT31.PA.

CAT31.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAT31.PA stands at 117.88M. In comparison, BNB.BR has a market cap of 138.80M. Regarding current trading prices, CAT31.PA is priced at $83.10, while BNB.BR trades at $347.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAT31.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.66, whereas BNB.BR's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, CAT31.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BNB.BR's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT31.PA is less volatile compared to BNB.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT31.PA.

CAT31.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAT31.PA stands at 117.88M. In comparison, CRAV.PA has a market cap of 120.17M. Regarding current trading prices, CAT31.PA is priced at $83.10, while CRAV.PA trades at $99.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAT31.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.66, whereas CRAV.PA's P/E ratio is 8.56. In terms of profitability, CAT31.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CRAV.PA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT31.PA is less volatile compared to CRAV.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT31.PA.

CAT31.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAT31.PA stands at 117.88M. In comparison, CMO.PA has a market cap of 118.33M. Regarding current trading prices, CAT31.PA is priced at $83.10, while CMO.PA trades at $76.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAT31.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.66, whereas CMO.PA's P/E ratio is 5.78. In terms of profitability, CAT31.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CMO.PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT31.PA is less volatile compared to CMO.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT31.PA.

CAT31.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAT31.PA stands at 117.88M. In comparison, CCN.PA has a market cap of 103.92M. Regarding current trading prices, CAT31.PA is priced at $83.10, while CCN.PA trades at $99.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAT31.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.66, whereas CCN.PA's P/E ratio is 7.62. In terms of profitability, CAT31.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CCN.PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT31.PA is less volatile compared to CCN.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT31.PA.

CAT31.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAT31.PA stands at 117.88M. In comparison, CRLA.PA has a market cap of 103.48M. Regarding current trading prices, CAT31.PA is priced at $83.10, while CRLA.PA trades at $58.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAT31.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.66, whereas CRLA.PA's P/E ratio is 6.32. In terms of profitability, CAT31.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CRLA.PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT31.PA is less volatile compared to CRLA.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT31.PA.

CAT31.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAT31.PA stands at 117.88M. In comparison, CRSU.PA has a market cap of 89.97M. Regarding current trading prices, CAT31.PA is priced at $83.10, while CRSU.PA trades at $143.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAT31.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.66, whereas CRSU.PA's P/E ratio is 6.54. In terms of profitability, CAT31.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CRSU.PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT31.PA is more volatile compared to CRSU.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT31.PA.

CAT31.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAT31.PA stands at 117.88M. In comparison, CRTO.PA has a market cap of 86.96M. Regarding current trading prices, CAT31.PA is priced at $83.10, while CRTO.PA trades at $85.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAT31.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.66, whereas CRTO.PA's P/E ratio is 7.99. In terms of profitability, CAT31.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CRTO.PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT31.PA is less volatile compared to CRTO.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT31.PA.

CAT31.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAT31.PA stands at 117.88M. In comparison, CRLO.PA has a market cap of 70.21M. Regarding current trading prices, CAT31.PA is priced at $83.10, while CRLO.PA trades at $70.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAT31.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.66, whereas CRLO.PA's P/E ratio is 7.34. In terms of profitability, CAT31.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CRLO.PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT31.PA is less volatile compared to CRLO.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT31.PA.

CAT31.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAT31.PA stands at 117.88M. In comparison, CRAP.PA has a market cap of 59.57M. Regarding current trading prices, CAT31.PA is priced at $83.10, while CRAP.PA trades at $86.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAT31.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.66, whereas CRAP.PA's P/E ratio is 4.81. In terms of profitability, CAT31.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CRAP.PA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT31.PA is more volatile compared to CRAP.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT31.PA.

CAT31.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAT31.PA stands at 117.88M. In comparison, MLGRC.PA has a market cap of 36.22M. Regarding current trading prices, CAT31.PA is priced at $83.10, while MLGRC.PA trades at $15.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAT31.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.66, whereas MLGRC.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAT31.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MLGRC.PA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT31.PA is more volatile compared to MLGRC.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT31.PA.

CAT31.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAT31.PA stands at 117.88M. In comparison, KN.PA comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, CAT31.PA is priced at $83.10, while KN.PA trades at $4.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAT31.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.66, whereas KN.PA's P/E ratio is 25.01. In terms of profitability, CAT31.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to KN.PA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CAT31.PA is more volatile compared to KN.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAT31.PA.