Carysil Limited

CARYSIL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CARYSIL.NS stands at 26.1B. In comparison, AMBER.NS has a market cap of 278.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CARYSIL.NS is priced at ₹918.20, while AMBER.NS trades at ₹7,929.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CARYSIL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.16, whereas AMBER.NS's P/E ratio is 169.91. In terms of profitability, CARYSIL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AMBER.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CARYSIL.NS is less volatile compared to AMBER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARYSIL.NS.Check AMBER.NS's competition here

CARYSIL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CARYSIL.NS stands at 26.1B. In comparison, AMBER.BO has a market cap of 278.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CARYSIL.NS is priced at ₹918.20, while AMBER.BO trades at ₹7,916.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CARYSIL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.16, whereas AMBER.BO's P/E ratio is 169.67. In terms of profitability, CARYSIL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AMBER.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CARYSIL.NS is less volatile compared to AMBER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARYSIL.NS.Check AMBER.BO's competition here

CARYSIL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CARYSIL.NS stands at 26.1B. In comparison, CROMPTON.BO has a market cap of 169B. Regarding current trading prices, CARYSIL.NS is priced at ₹918.20, while CROMPTON.BO trades at ₹262.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CARYSIL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.16, whereas CROMPTON.BO's P/E ratio is 36.61. In terms of profitability, CARYSIL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CROMPTON.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CARYSIL.NS is more volatile compared to CROMPTON.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARYSIL.NS.Check CROMPTON.BO's competition here

CARYSIL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CARYSIL.NS stands at 26.1B. In comparison, CROMPTON.NS has a market cap of 169B. Regarding current trading prices, CARYSIL.NS is priced at ₹918.20, while CROMPTON.NS trades at ₹262.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CARYSIL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.16, whereas CROMPTON.NS's P/E ratio is 36.60. In terms of profitability, CARYSIL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CROMPTON.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CARYSIL.NS is more volatile compared to CROMPTON.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARYSIL.NS.Check CROMPTON.NS's competition here

CARYSIL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CARYSIL.NS stands at 26.1B. In comparison, CENTURYPLY.NS has a market cap of 167.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CARYSIL.NS is priced at ₹918.20, while CENTURYPLY.NS trades at ₹754.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CARYSIL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.16, whereas CENTURYPLY.NS's P/E ratio is 70.60. In terms of profitability, CARYSIL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CENTURYPLY.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CARYSIL.NS is less volatile compared to CENTURYPLY.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARYSIL.NS.Check CENTURYPLY.NS's competition here

CARYSIL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CARYSIL.NS stands at 26.1B. In comparison, WHIRLPOOL.NS has a market cap of 114.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CARYSIL.NS is priced at ₹918.20, while WHIRLPOOL.NS trades at ₹904.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CARYSIL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.16, whereas WHIRLPOOL.NS's P/E ratio is 34.47. In terms of profitability, CARYSIL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WHIRLPOOL.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CARYSIL.NS is less volatile compared to WHIRLPOOL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARYSIL.NS.Check WHIRLPOOL.NS's competition here

CARYSIL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CARYSIL.NS stands at 26.1B. In comparison, WHIRLPOOL.BO has a market cap of 114.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CARYSIL.NS is priced at ₹918.20, while WHIRLPOOL.BO trades at ₹901.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CARYSIL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.16, whereas WHIRLPOOL.BO's P/E ratio is 32.64. In terms of profitability, CARYSIL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WHIRLPOOL.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CARYSIL.NS is less volatile compared to WHIRLPOOL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARYSIL.NS.Check WHIRLPOOL.BO's competition here

CARYSIL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CARYSIL.NS stands at 26.1B. In comparison, EUREKAFORB.BO has a market cap of 95.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CARYSIL.NS is priced at ₹918.20, while EUREKAFORB.BO trades at ₹493.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CARYSIL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.16, whereas EUREKAFORB.BO's P/E ratio is 59.95. In terms of profitability, CARYSIL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to EUREKAFORB.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CARYSIL.NS is less volatile compared to EUREKAFORB.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARYSIL.NS.Check EUREKAFORB.BO's competition here

CARYSIL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CARYSIL.NS stands at 26.1B. In comparison, EUREKAFORB.NS has a market cap of 95.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CARYSIL.NS is priced at ₹918.20, while EUREKAFORB.NS trades at ₹493.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CARYSIL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.16, whereas EUREKAFORB.NS's P/E ratio is 59.51. In terms of profitability, CARYSIL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to EUREKAFORB.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CARYSIL.NS is less volatile compared to EUREKAFORB.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARYSIL.NS.Check EUREKAFORB.NS's competition here

CARYSIL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CARYSIL.NS stands at 26.1B. In comparison, CELLO.BO has a market cap of 94.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CARYSIL.NS is priced at ₹918.20, while CELLO.BO trades at ₹427.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CARYSIL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.16, whereas CELLO.BO's P/E ratio is 30.63. In terms of profitability, CARYSIL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CELLO.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CARYSIL.NS is more volatile compared to CELLO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARYSIL.NS.Check CELLO.BO's competition here

CARYSIL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CARYSIL.NS stands at 26.1B. In comparison, CELLO.NS has a market cap of 94.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CARYSIL.NS is priced at ₹918.20, while CELLO.NS trades at ₹427.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CARYSIL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.16, whereas CELLO.NS's P/E ratio is 30.63. In terms of profitability, CARYSIL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CELLO.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CARYSIL.NS is more volatile compared to CELLO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARYSIL.NS.Check CELLO.NS's competition here

CARYSIL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CARYSIL.NS stands at 26.1B. In comparison, TTKPRESTIG.NS has a market cap of 74B. Regarding current trading prices, CARYSIL.NS is priced at ₹918.20, while TTKPRESTIG.NS trades at ₹540.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CARYSIL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.16, whereas TTKPRESTIG.NS's P/E ratio is 88.78. In terms of profitability, CARYSIL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TTKPRESTIG.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CARYSIL.NS is less volatile compared to TTKPRESTIG.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARYSIL.NS.Check TTKPRESTIG.NS's competition here

CARYSIL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CARYSIL.NS stands at 26.1B. In comparison, TTKPRESTIG.BO has a market cap of 73.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CARYSIL.NS is priced at ₹918.20, while TTKPRESTIG.BO trades at ₹539.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CARYSIL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.16, whereas TTKPRESTIG.BO's P/E ratio is 88.57. In terms of profitability, CARYSIL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TTKPRESTIG.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CARYSIL.NS is less volatile compared to TTKPRESTIG.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARYSIL.NS.Check TTKPRESTIG.BO's competition here

CARYSIL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CARYSIL.NS stands at 26.1B. In comparison, AVL.BO has a market cap of 62.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CARYSIL.NS is priced at ₹918.20, while AVL.BO trades at ₹481.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CARYSIL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.16, whereas AVL.BO's P/E ratio is 56.19. In terms of profitability, CARYSIL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AVL.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CARYSIL.NS is less volatile compared to AVL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARYSIL.NS.Check AVL.BO's competition here

CARYSIL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CARYSIL.NS stands at 26.1B. In comparison, GREENLAM.BO has a market cap of 60.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CARYSIL.NS is priced at ₹918.20, while GREENLAM.BO trades at ₹238.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CARYSIL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.16, whereas GREENLAM.BO's P/E ratio is 350.37. In terms of profitability, CARYSIL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GREENLAM.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CARYSIL.NS is more volatile compared to GREENLAM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARYSIL.NS.Check GREENLAM.BO's competition here

CARYSIL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CARYSIL.NS stands at 26.1B. In comparison, SFL.NS has a market cap of 60.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CARYSIL.NS is priced at ₹918.20, while SFL.NS trades at ₹555.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CARYSIL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.16, whereas SFL.NS's P/E ratio is 68.54. In terms of profitability, CARYSIL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SFL.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CARYSIL.NS is less volatile compared to SFL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARYSIL.NS.Check SFL.NS's competition here

CARYSIL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CARYSIL.NS stands at 26.1B. In comparison, GREENLAM.NS has a market cap of 60.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CARYSIL.NS is priced at ₹918.20, while GREENLAM.NS trades at ₹236.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CARYSIL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.16, whereas GREENLAM.NS's P/E ratio is 347.93. In terms of profitability, CARYSIL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GREENLAM.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CARYSIL.NS is less volatile compared to GREENLAM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARYSIL.NS.Check GREENLAM.NS's competition here

CARYSIL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CARYSIL.NS stands at 26.1B. In comparison, SFL.BO has a market cap of 60.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CARYSIL.NS is priced at ₹918.20, while SFL.BO trades at ₹555.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CARYSIL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.16, whereas SFL.BO's P/E ratio is 68.54. In terms of profitability, CARYSIL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SFL.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CARYSIL.NS is less volatile compared to SFL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARYSIL.NS.Check SFL.BO's competition here

CARYSIL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CARYSIL.NS stands at 26.1B. In comparison, SYMPHONY.NS has a market cap of 57.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CARYSIL.NS is priced at ₹918.20, while SYMPHONY.NS trades at ₹839.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CARYSIL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.16, whereas SYMPHONY.NS's P/E ratio is 34.08. In terms of profitability, CARYSIL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SYMPHONY.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CARYSIL.NS is more volatile compared to SYMPHONY.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARYSIL.NS.Check SYMPHONY.NS's competition here

CARYSIL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CARYSIL.NS stands at 26.1B. In comparison, SYMPHONY.BO has a market cap of 57.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CARYSIL.NS is priced at ₹918.20, while SYMPHONY.BO trades at ₹839.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CARYSIL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.16, whereas SYMPHONY.BO's P/E ratio is 34.05. In terms of profitability, CARYSIL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SYMPHONY.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CARYSIL.NS is more volatile compared to SYMPHONY.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARYSIL.NS.Check SYMPHONY.BO's competition here

CARYSIL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CARYSIL.NS stands at 26.1B. In comparison, IFBIND.BO has a market cap of 45.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CARYSIL.NS is priced at ₹918.20, while IFBIND.BO trades at ₹1,122.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CARYSIL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.16, whereas IFBIND.BO's P/E ratio is 37.96. In terms of profitability, CARYSIL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to IFBIND.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CARYSIL.NS is less volatile compared to IFBIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARYSIL.NS.Check IFBIND.BO's competition here

CARYSIL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CARYSIL.NS stands at 26.1B. In comparison, IFBIND.NS has a market cap of 45.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CARYSIL.NS is priced at ₹918.20, while IFBIND.NS trades at ₹1,121.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CARYSIL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.16, whereas IFBIND.NS's P/E ratio is 37.92. In terms of profitability, CARYSIL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to IFBIND.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CARYSIL.NS is less volatile compared to IFBIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARYSIL.NS.Check IFBIND.NS's competition here

CARYSIL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CARYSIL.NS stands at 26.1B. In comparison, BAJAJELEC.BO has a market cap of 42.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CARYSIL.NS is priced at ₹918.20, while BAJAJELEC.BO trades at ₹370.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CARYSIL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.16, whereas BAJAJELEC.BO's P/E ratio is 39.68. In terms of profitability, CARYSIL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BAJAJELEC.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CARYSIL.NS is less volatile compared to BAJAJELEC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARYSIL.NS.Check BAJAJELEC.BO's competition here

CARYSIL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CARYSIL.NS stands at 26.1B. In comparison, BAJAJELEC.NS has a market cap of 42.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CARYSIL.NS is priced at ₹918.20, while BAJAJELEC.NS trades at ₹370.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CARYSIL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.16, whereas BAJAJELEC.NS's P/E ratio is 120.13. In terms of profitability, CARYSIL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BAJAJELEC.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CARYSIL.NS is less volatile compared to BAJAJELEC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARYSIL.NS.Check BAJAJELEC.NS's competition here

CARYSIL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CARYSIL.NS stands at 26.1B. In comparison, JCHAC.NS has a market cap of 38.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CARYSIL.NS is priced at ₹918.20, while JCHAC.NS trades at ₹1,432.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CARYSIL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.16, whereas JCHAC.NS's P/E ratio is 138.91. In terms of profitability, CARYSIL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to JCHAC.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CARYSIL.NS is less volatile compared to JCHAC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARYSIL.NS.Check JCHAC.NS's competition here

CARYSIL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CARYSIL.NS stands at 26.1B. In comparison, JCHAC.BO has a market cap of 38.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CARYSIL.NS is priced at ₹918.20, while JCHAC.BO trades at ₹1,427.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CARYSIL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.16, whereas JCHAC.BO's P/E ratio is 137.83. In terms of profitability, CARYSIL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to JCHAC.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CARYSIL.NS is more volatile compared to JCHAC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARYSIL.NS.Check JCHAC.BO's competition here

CARYSIL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CARYSIL.NS stands at 26.1B. In comparison, STYLAMIND.NS has a market cap of 37.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CARYSIL.NS is priced at ₹918.20, while STYLAMIND.NS trades at ₹2,216.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CARYSIL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.16, whereas STYLAMIND.NS's P/E ratio is 26.63. In terms of profitability, CARYSIL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to STYLAMIND.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CARYSIL.NS is more volatile compared to STYLAMIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARYSIL.NS.Check STYLAMIND.NS's competition here

CARYSIL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CARYSIL.NS stands at 26.1B. In comparison, STYLAMIND.BO has a market cap of 37.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CARYSIL.NS is priced at ₹918.20, while STYLAMIND.BO trades at ₹2,212.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CARYSIL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.16, whereas STYLAMIND.BO's P/E ratio is 26.58. In terms of profitability, CARYSIL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to STYLAMIND.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CARYSIL.NS is more volatile compared to STYLAMIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARYSIL.NS.Check STYLAMIND.BO's competition here

CARYSIL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CARYSIL.NS stands at 26.1B. In comparison, BOSCH-HCIL.NS has a market cap of 37.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CARYSIL.NS is priced at ₹918.20, while BOSCH-HCIL.NS trades at ₹1,378.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CARYSIL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.16, whereas BOSCH-HCIL.NS's P/E ratio is 308.97. In terms of profitability, CARYSIL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BOSCH-HCIL.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CARYSIL.NS is less volatile compared to BOSCH-HCIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARYSIL.NS.Check BOSCH-HCIL.NS's competition here

CARYSIL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CARYSIL.NS stands at 26.1B. In comparison, BOSCH-HCIL.BO has a market cap of 37.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CARYSIL.NS is priced at ₹918.20, while BOSCH-HCIL.BO trades at ₹1,370.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CARYSIL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.16, whereas BOSCH-HCIL.BO's P/E ratio is 301.30. In terms of profitability, CARYSIL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BOSCH-HCIL.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CARYSIL.NS is less volatile compared to BOSCH-HCIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARYSIL.NS.Check BOSCH-HCIL.BO's competition here

CARYSIL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CARYSIL.NS stands at 26.1B. In comparison, ORIENTELEC.BO has a market cap of 37.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CARYSIL.NS is priced at ₹918.20, while ORIENTELEC.BO trades at ₹174.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CARYSIL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.16, whereas ORIENTELEC.BO's P/E ratio is 42.85. In terms of profitability, CARYSIL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ORIENTELEC.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CARYSIL.NS is more volatile compared to ORIENTELEC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARYSIL.NS.Check ORIENTELEC.BO's competition here

CARYSIL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CARYSIL.NS stands at 26.1B. In comparison, ORIENTELEC.NS has a market cap of 37.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CARYSIL.NS is priced at ₹918.20, while ORIENTELEC.NS trades at ₹174.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CARYSIL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.16, whereas ORIENTELEC.NS's P/E ratio is 42.66. In terms of profitability, CARYSIL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ORIENTELEC.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CARYSIL.NS is less volatile compared to ORIENTELEC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARYSIL.NS.Check ORIENTELEC.NS's competition here

CARYSIL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CARYSIL.NS stands at 26.1B. In comparison, BOROLTD.NS has a market cap of 29.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CARYSIL.NS is priced at ₹918.20, while BOROLTD.NS trades at ₹245.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CARYSIL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.16, whereas BOROLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 39.08. In terms of profitability, CARYSIL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BOROLTD.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CARYSIL.NS is less volatile compared to BOROLTD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARYSIL.NS.Check BOROLTD.NS's competition here

CARYSIL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CARYSIL.NS stands at 26.1B. In comparison, BOROLTD.BO has a market cap of 29.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CARYSIL.NS is priced at ₹918.20, while BOROLTD.BO trades at ₹245.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CARYSIL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.16, whereas BOROLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 39.01. In terms of profitability, CARYSIL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BOROLTD.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CARYSIL.NS is less volatile compared to BOROLTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARYSIL.NS.Check BOROLTD.BO's competition here

CARYSIL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CARYSIL.NS stands at 26.1B. In comparison, CARYSIL.BO has a market cap of 26.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CARYSIL.NS is priced at ₹918.20, while CARYSIL.BO trades at ₹917.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CARYSIL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.16, whereas CARYSIL.BO's P/E ratio is 29.11. In terms of profitability, CARYSIL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CARYSIL.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CARYSIL.NS is more volatile compared to CARYSIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARYSIL.NS.Check CARYSIL.BO's competition here

CARYSIL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CARYSIL.NS stands at 26.1B. In comparison, GREENPANEL.NS has a market cap of 25.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CARYSIL.NS is priced at ₹918.20, while GREENPANEL.NS trades at ₹209.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CARYSIL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.16, whereas GREENPANEL.NS's P/E ratio is -2328.11. In terms of profitability, CARYSIL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GREENPANEL.NS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CARYSIL.NS is less volatile compared to GREENPANEL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARYSIL.NS.Check GREENPANEL.NS's competition here

CARYSIL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CARYSIL.NS stands at 26.1B. In comparison, LAOPALA.BO has a market cap of 23.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CARYSIL.NS is priced at ₹918.20, while LAOPALA.BO trades at ₹208.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CARYSIL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.16, whereas LAOPALA.BO's P/E ratio is 22.73. In terms of profitability, CARYSIL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to LAOPALA.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CARYSIL.NS is less volatile compared to LAOPALA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARYSIL.NS.Check LAOPALA.BO's competition here

CARYSIL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CARYSIL.NS stands at 26.1B. In comparison, LAOPALA.NS has a market cap of 23.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CARYSIL.NS is priced at ₹918.20, while LAOPALA.NS trades at ₹208.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CARYSIL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.16, whereas LAOPALA.NS's P/E ratio is 22.72. In terms of profitability, CARYSIL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to LAOPALA.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CARYSIL.NS is less volatile compared to LAOPALA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARYSIL.NS.Check LAOPALA.NS's competition here

CARYSIL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CARYSIL.NS stands at 26.1B. In comparison, NILKAMAL.NS has a market cap of 20.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CARYSIL.NS is priced at ₹918.20, while NILKAMAL.NS trades at ₹1,395.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CARYSIL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.16, whereas NILKAMAL.NS's P/E ratio is 19.24. In terms of profitability, CARYSIL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NILKAMAL.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CARYSIL.NS is less volatile compared to NILKAMAL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARYSIL.NS.Check NILKAMAL.NS's competition here

CARYSIL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CARYSIL.NS stands at 26.1B. In comparison, NILKAMAL.BO has a market cap of 20.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CARYSIL.NS is priced at ₹918.20, while NILKAMAL.BO trades at ₹1,393.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CARYSIL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.16, whereas NILKAMAL.BO's P/E ratio is 19.21. In terms of profitability, CARYSIL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NILKAMAL.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CARYSIL.NS is more volatile compared to NILKAMAL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARYSIL.NS.Check NILKAMAL.BO's competition here

CARYSIL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CARYSIL.NS stands at 26.1B. In comparison, HINDWAREAP.NS has a market cap of 19.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CARYSIL.NS is priced at ₹918.20, while HINDWAREAP.NS trades at ₹228.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CARYSIL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.16, whereas HINDWAREAP.NS's P/E ratio is -33.98. In terms of profitability, CARYSIL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HINDWAREAP.NS's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CARYSIL.NS is more volatile compared to HINDWAREAP.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARYSIL.NS.Check HINDWAREAP.NS's competition here

CARYSIL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CARYSIL.NS stands at 26.1B. In comparison, HINDWAREAP.BO has a market cap of 19.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CARYSIL.NS is priced at ₹918.20, while HINDWAREAP.BO trades at ₹228.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CARYSIL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.16, whereas HINDWAREAP.BO's P/E ratio is -34.03. In terms of profitability, CARYSIL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HINDWAREAP.BO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CARYSIL.NS is more volatile compared to HINDWAREAP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARYSIL.NS.Check HINDWAREAP.BO's competition here

CARYSIL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CARYSIL.NS stands at 26.1B. In comparison, WEL.NS has a market cap of 19B. Regarding current trading prices, CARYSIL.NS is priced at ₹918.20, while WEL.NS trades at ₹141.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CARYSIL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.16, whereas WEL.NS's P/E ratio is 105.63. In terms of profitability, CARYSIL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WEL.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CARYSIL.NS is less volatile compared to WEL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARYSIL.NS.Check WEL.NS's competition here

CARYSIL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CARYSIL.NS stands at 26.1B. In comparison, WEL.BO has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CARYSIL.NS is priced at ₹918.20, while WEL.BO trades at ₹141.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CARYSIL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.16, whereas WEL.BO's P/E ratio is 104.44. In terms of profitability, CARYSIL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WEL.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CARYSIL.NS is less volatile compared to WEL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARYSIL.NS.Check WEL.BO's competition here

CARYSIL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CARYSIL.NS stands at 26.1B. In comparison, STOVEKRAFT.NS has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, CARYSIL.NS is priced at ₹918.20, while STOVEKRAFT.NS trades at ₹483.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CARYSIL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.16, whereas STOVEKRAFT.NS's P/E ratio is 42.86. In terms of profitability, CARYSIL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to STOVEKRAFT.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CARYSIL.NS is less volatile compared to STOVEKRAFT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARYSIL.NS.Check STOVEKRAFT.NS's competition here

CARYSIL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CARYSIL.NS stands at 26.1B. In comparison, STOVEKRAFT.BO has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, CARYSIL.NS is priced at ₹918.20, while STOVEKRAFT.BO trades at ₹482.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CARYSIL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.16, whereas STOVEKRAFT.BO's P/E ratio is 42.63. In terms of profitability, CARYSIL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to STOVEKRAFT.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CARYSIL.NS is more volatile compared to STOVEKRAFT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARYSIL.NS.Check STOVEKRAFT.BO's competition here

CARYSIL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CARYSIL.NS stands at 26.1B. In comparison, BUTTERFLY.BO has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CARYSIL.NS is priced at ₹918.20, while BUTTERFLY.BO trades at ₹600.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CARYSIL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.16, whereas BUTTERFLY.BO's P/E ratio is 24.83. In terms of profitability, CARYSIL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BUTTERFLY.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CARYSIL.NS is more volatile compared to BUTTERFLY.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARYSIL.NS.Check BUTTERFLY.BO's competition here

CARYSIL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CARYSIL.NS stands at 26.1B. In comparison, BUTTERFLY.NS has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CARYSIL.NS is priced at ₹918.20, while BUTTERFLY.NS trades at ₹600.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CARYSIL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.16, whereas BUTTERFLY.NS's P/E ratio is 24.83. In terms of profitability, CARYSIL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BUTTERFLY.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CARYSIL.NS is less volatile compared to BUTTERFLY.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARYSIL.NS.Check BUTTERFLY.NS's competition here

CARYSIL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CARYSIL.NS stands at 26.1B. In comparison, SAINTGOBAIN.BO has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CARYSIL.NS is priced at ₹918.20, while SAINTGOBAIN.BO trades at ₹113.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CARYSIL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.16, whereas SAINTGOBAIN.BO's P/E ratio is 28.70. In terms of profitability, CARYSIL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SAINTGOBAIN.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CARYSIL.NS is more volatile compared to SAINTGOBAIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARYSIL.NS.Check SAINTGOBAIN.BO's competition here

CARYSIL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CARYSIL.NS stands at 26.1B. In comparison, STANLEY.NS has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CARYSIL.NS is priced at ₹918.20, while STANLEY.NS trades at ₹167.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CARYSIL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.16, whereas STANLEY.NS's P/E ratio is 39.94. In terms of profitability, CARYSIL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to STANLEY.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CARYSIL.NS is less volatile compared to STANLEY.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARYSIL.NS.Check STANLEY.NS's competition here

CARYSIL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CARYSIL.NS stands at 26.1B. In comparison, ROBU.BO has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CARYSIL.NS is priced at ₹918.20, while ROBU.BO trades at ₹999.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CARYSIL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.16, whereas ROBU.BO's P/E ratio is 45.65. In terms of profitability, CARYSIL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ROBU.BO's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CARYSIL.NS is less volatile compared to ROBU.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARYSIL.NS.Check ROBU.BO's competition here

CARYSIL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CARYSIL.NS stands at 26.1B. In comparison, MIRCELECTR.BO has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CARYSIL.NS is priced at ₹918.20, while MIRCELECTR.BO trades at ₹28.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CARYSIL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.16, whereas MIRCELECTR.BO's P/E ratio is -41.43. In terms of profitability, CARYSIL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MIRCELECTR.BO's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CARYSIL.NS is less volatile compared to MIRCELECTR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARYSIL.NS.Check MIRCELECTR.BO's competition here

CARYSIL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CARYSIL.NS stands at 26.1B. In comparison, MIRCELECTR.NS has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CARYSIL.NS is priced at ₹918.20, while MIRCELECTR.NS trades at ₹28.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CARYSIL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.16, whereas MIRCELECTR.NS's P/E ratio is -32.39. In terms of profitability, CARYSIL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MIRCELECTR.NS's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CARYSIL.NS is less volatile compared to MIRCELECTR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARYSIL.NS.Check MIRCELECTR.NS's competition here

CARYSIL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CARYSIL.NS stands at 26.1B. In comparison, RUSHIL.NS has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CARYSIL.NS is priced at ₹918.20, while RUSHIL.NS trades at ₹18.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CARYSIL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.16, whereas RUSHIL.NS's P/E ratio is 55.91. In terms of profitability, CARYSIL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to RUSHIL.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CARYSIL.NS is less volatile compared to RUSHIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARYSIL.NS.Check RUSHIL.NS's competition here

CARYSIL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CARYSIL.NS stands at 26.1B. In comparison, RUSHIL.BO has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CARYSIL.NS is priced at ₹918.20, while RUSHIL.BO trades at ₹18.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CARYSIL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.16, whereas RUSHIL.BO's P/E ratio is 55.70. In terms of profitability, CARYSIL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to RUSHIL.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CARYSIL.NS is less volatile compared to RUSHIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARYSIL.NS.Check RUSHIL.BO's competition here

CARYSIL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CARYSIL.NS stands at 26.1B. In comparison, WIMPLAST.BO has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CARYSIL.NS is priced at ₹918.20, while WIMPLAST.BO trades at ₹390.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CARYSIL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.16, whereas WIMPLAST.BO's P/E ratio is 7.82. In terms of profitability, CARYSIL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WIMPLAST.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CARYSIL.NS is less volatile compared to WIMPLAST.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARYSIL.NS.Check WIMPLAST.BO's competition here

CARYSIL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CARYSIL.NS stands at 26.1B. In comparison, SINGER.BO has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CARYSIL.NS is priced at ₹918.20, while SINGER.BO trades at ₹72.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CARYSIL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.16, whereas SINGER.BO's P/E ratio is 63.44. In terms of profitability, CARYSIL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SINGER.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CARYSIL.NS is less volatile compared to SINGER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARYSIL.NS.Check SINGER.BO's competition here

CARYSIL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CARYSIL.NS stands at 26.1B. In comparison, FOCUS.NS has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CARYSIL.NS is priced at ₹918.20, while FOCUS.NS trades at ₹65.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CARYSIL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.16, whereas FOCUS.NS's P/E ratio is 91.77. In terms of profitability, CARYSIL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FOCUS.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CARYSIL.NS is less volatile compared to FOCUS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARYSIL.NS.Check FOCUS.NS's competition here

CARYSIL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CARYSIL.NS stands at 26.1B. In comparison, BELLACASA.BO has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CARYSIL.NS is priced at ₹918.20, while BELLACASA.BO trades at ₹277.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CARYSIL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.16, whereas BELLACASA.BO's P/E ratio is 18.55. In terms of profitability, CARYSIL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BELLACASA.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CARYSIL.NS is less volatile compared to BELLACASA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARYSIL.NS.Check BELLACASA.BO's competition here

CARYSIL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CARYSIL.NS stands at 26.1B. In comparison, SPITZE.BO has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, CARYSIL.NS is priced at ₹918.20, while SPITZE.BO trades at ₹199.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CARYSIL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.16, whereas SPITZE.BO's P/E ratio is 48.77. In terms of profitability, CARYSIL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SPITZE.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CARYSIL.NS is more volatile compared to SPITZE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARYSIL.NS.Check SPITZE.BO's competition here

CARYSIL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CARYSIL.NS stands at 26.1B. In comparison, BHATIA.BO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CARYSIL.NS is priced at ₹918.20, while BHATIA.BO trades at ₹21.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CARYSIL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.16, whereas BHATIA.BO's P/E ratio is 22.42. In terms of profitability, CARYSIL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BHATIA.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CARYSIL.NS is less volatile compared to BHATIA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARYSIL.NS.Check BHATIA.BO's competition here

CARYSIL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CARYSIL.NS stands at 26.1B. In comparison, VIDEOIND.NS has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CARYSIL.NS is priced at ₹918.20, while VIDEOIND.NS trades at ₹7.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CARYSIL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.16, whereas VIDEOIND.NS's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, CARYSIL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to VIDEOIND.NS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CARYSIL.NS is less volatile compared to VIDEOIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARYSIL.NS.Check VIDEOIND.NS's competition here

CARYSIL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CARYSIL.NS stands at 26.1B. In comparison, INFLAME.BO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CARYSIL.NS is priced at ₹918.20, while INFLAME.BO trades at ₹301.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CARYSIL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.16, whereas INFLAME.BO's P/E ratio is 38.83. In terms of profitability, CARYSIL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to INFLAME.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CARYSIL.NS is less volatile compared to INFLAME.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARYSIL.NS.Check INFLAME.BO's competition here

CARYSIL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CARYSIL.NS stands at 26.1B. In comparison, PILITA.BO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CARYSIL.NS is priced at ₹918.20, while PILITA.BO trades at ₹8.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CARYSIL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.16, whereas PILITA.BO's P/E ratio is 47.78. In terms of profitability, CARYSIL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PILITA.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CARYSIL.NS is less volatile compared to PILITA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARYSIL.NS.Check PILITA.BO's competition here

CARYSIL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CARYSIL.NS stands at 26.1B. In comparison, PILITA.NS has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CARYSIL.NS is priced at ₹918.20, while PILITA.NS trades at ₹8.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CARYSIL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.16, whereas PILITA.NS's P/E ratio is 47.56. In terms of profitability, CARYSIL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PILITA.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CARYSIL.NS is less volatile compared to PILITA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARYSIL.NS.Check PILITA.NS's competition here

CARYSIL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CARYSIL.NS stands at 26.1B. In comparison, SONAMLTD.NS has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CARYSIL.NS is priced at ₹918.20, while SONAMLTD.NS trades at ₹48.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CARYSIL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.16, whereas SONAMLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 30.53. In terms of profitability, CARYSIL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SONAMLTD.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CARYSIL.NS is less volatile compared to SONAMLTD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARYSIL.NS.Check SONAMLTD.NS's competition here

CARYSIL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CARYSIL.NS stands at 26.1B. In comparison, AVROIND.BO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CARYSIL.NS is priced at ₹918.20, while AVROIND.BO trades at ₹124.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CARYSIL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.16, whereas AVROIND.BO's P/E ratio is 43.26. In terms of profitability, CARYSIL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AVROIND.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CARYSIL.NS is less volatile compared to AVROIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARYSIL.NS.Check AVROIND.BO's competition here

CARYSIL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CARYSIL.NS stands at 26.1B. In comparison, SONAMCLOCK.NS has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CARYSIL.NS is priced at ₹918.20, while SONAMCLOCK.NS trades at ₹81.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CARYSIL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.16, whereas SONAMCLOCK.NS's P/E ratio is 40.88. In terms of profitability, CARYSIL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SONAMCLOCK.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CARYSIL.NS is less volatile compared to SONAMCLOCK.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARYSIL.NS.Check SONAMCLOCK.NS's competition here

CARYSIL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CARYSIL.NS stands at 26.1B. In comparison, AVROIND.NS has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CARYSIL.NS is priced at ₹918.20, while AVROIND.NS trades at ₹122.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CARYSIL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.16, whereas AVROIND.NS's P/E ratio is 42.38. In terms of profitability, CARYSIL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AVROIND.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CARYSIL.NS is less volatile compared to AVROIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARYSIL.NS.Check AVROIND.NS's competition here

CARYSIL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CARYSIL.NS stands at 26.1B. In comparison, AIROLAM.NS has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CARYSIL.NS is priced at ₹918.20, while AIROLAM.NS trades at ₹92.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CARYSIL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.16, whereas AIROLAM.NS's P/E ratio is 51.53. In terms of profitability, CARYSIL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AIROLAM.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CARYSIL.NS is less volatile compared to AIROLAM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARYSIL.NS.Check AIROLAM.NS's competition here

CARYSIL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CARYSIL.NS stands at 26.1B. In comparison, PRIMAPLA.BO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CARYSIL.NS is priced at ₹918.20, while PRIMAPLA.BO trades at ₹116.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CARYSIL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.16, whereas PRIMAPLA.BO's P/E ratio is 6.88. In terms of profitability, CARYSIL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PRIMAPLA.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CARYSIL.NS is less volatile compared to PRIMAPLA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARYSIL.NS.Check PRIMAPLA.BO's competition here

CARYSIL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CARYSIL.NS stands at 26.1B. In comparison, TEXELIN.BO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CARYSIL.NS is priced at ₹918.20, while TEXELIN.BO trades at ₹83.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CARYSIL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.16, whereas TEXELIN.BO's P/E ratio is 5.08. In terms of profitability, CARYSIL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TEXELIN.BO's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CARYSIL.NS is less volatile compared to TEXELIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARYSIL.NS.Check TEXELIN.BO's competition here

CARYSIL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CARYSIL.NS stands at 26.1B. In comparison, FOCUS.BO has a market cap of 909.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CARYSIL.NS is priced at ₹918.20, while FOCUS.BO trades at ₹125.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CARYSIL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.16, whereas FOCUS.BO's P/E ratio is 77.64. In terms of profitability, CARYSIL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FOCUS.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CARYSIL.NS is more volatile compared to FOCUS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARYSIL.NS.Check FOCUS.BO's competition here

CARYSIL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CARYSIL.NS stands at 26.1B. In comparison, PRITI.NS has a market cap of 616.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CARYSIL.NS is priced at ₹918.20, while PRITI.NS trades at ₹46.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CARYSIL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.16, whereas PRITI.NS's P/E ratio is 17.48. In terms of profitability, CARYSIL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PRITI.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CARYSIL.NS is less volatile compared to PRITI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARYSIL.NS.Check PRITI.NS's competition here

CARYSIL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CARYSIL.NS stands at 26.1B. In comparison, SACHEMT.BO has a market cap of 485M. Regarding current trading prices, CARYSIL.NS is priced at ₹918.20, while SACHEMT.BO trades at ₹3.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CARYSIL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.16, whereas SACHEMT.BO's P/E ratio is 21.56. In terms of profitability, CARYSIL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SACHEMT.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CARYSIL.NS is more volatile compared to SACHEMT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARYSIL.NS.Check SACHEMT.BO's competition here

CARYSIL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CARYSIL.NS stands at 26.1B. In comparison, KHAITANLTD.BO has a market cap of 446M. Regarding current trading prices, CARYSIL.NS is priced at ₹918.20, while KHAITANLTD.BO trades at ₹93.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CARYSIL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.16, whereas KHAITANLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 6.79. In terms of profitability, CARYSIL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KHAITANLTD.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CARYSIL.NS is less volatile compared to KHAITANLTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARYSIL.NS.Check KHAITANLTD.BO's competition here

CARYSIL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CARYSIL.NS stands at 26.1B. In comparison, KHAITANLTD.NS has a market cap of 436.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CARYSIL.NS is priced at ₹918.20, while KHAITANLTD.NS trades at ₹91.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CARYSIL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.16, whereas KHAITANLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 6.64. In terms of profitability, CARYSIL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KHAITANLTD.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CARYSIL.NS is less volatile compared to KHAITANLTD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARYSIL.NS.Check KHAITANLTD.NS's competition here

CARYSIL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CARYSIL.NS stands at 26.1B. In comparison, ADL.BO has a market cap of 430.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CARYSIL.NS is priced at ₹918.20, while ADL.BO trades at ₹77.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CARYSIL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.16, whereas ADL.BO's P/E ratio is 3871.00. In terms of profitability, CARYSIL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ADL.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CARYSIL.NS is more volatile compared to ADL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARYSIL.NS.Check ADL.BO's competition here

CARYSIL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CARYSIL.NS stands at 26.1B. In comparison, ADL.NS has a market cap of 410.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CARYSIL.NS is priced at ₹918.20, while ADL.NS trades at ₹73.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CARYSIL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.16, whereas ADL.NS's P/E ratio is 3691.00. In terms of profitability, CARYSIL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ADL.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CARYSIL.NS is less volatile compared to ADL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARYSIL.NS.Check ADL.NS's competition here

CARYSIL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CARYSIL.NS stands at 26.1B. In comparison, TIRUFOAM.BO has a market cap of 315.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CARYSIL.NS is priced at ₹918.20, while TIRUFOAM.BO trades at ₹71.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CARYSIL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.16, whereas TIRUFOAM.BO's P/E ratio is 14.39. In terms of profitability, CARYSIL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TIRUFOAM.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CARYSIL.NS is more volatile compared to TIRUFOAM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARYSIL.NS.Check TIRUFOAM.BO's competition here

CARYSIL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CARYSIL.NS stands at 26.1B. In comparison, GORANIN.BO has a market cap of 314M. Regarding current trading prices, CARYSIL.NS is priced at ₹918.20, while GORANIN.BO trades at ₹58.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CARYSIL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.16, whereas GORANIN.BO's P/E ratio is 26.61. In terms of profitability, CARYSIL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GORANIN.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CARYSIL.NS is less volatile compared to GORANIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARYSIL.NS.Check GORANIN.BO's competition here

CARYSIL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CARYSIL.NS stands at 26.1B. In comparison, GUJRAFIA.BO has a market cap of 300.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CARYSIL.NS is priced at ₹918.20, while GUJRAFIA.BO trades at ₹55.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CARYSIL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.16, whereas GUJRAFIA.BO's P/E ratio is 94.24. In terms of profitability, CARYSIL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GUJRAFIA.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CARYSIL.NS is more volatile compared to GUJRAFIA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARYSIL.NS.Check GUJRAFIA.BO's competition here

CARYSIL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CARYSIL.NS stands at 26.1B. In comparison, MILEFUR.BO has a market cap of 278M. Regarding current trading prices, CARYSIL.NS is priced at ₹918.20, while MILEFUR.BO trades at ₹29.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CARYSIL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.16, whereas MILEFUR.BO's P/E ratio is -74.75. In terms of profitability, CARYSIL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MILEFUR.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CARYSIL.NS is less volatile compared to MILEFUR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARYSIL.NS.Check MILEFUR.BO's competition here

CARYSIL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CARYSIL.NS stands at 26.1B. In comparison, JAIMATAG.BO has a market cap of 192M. Regarding current trading prices, CARYSIL.NS is priced at ₹918.20, while JAIMATAG.BO trades at ₹1.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CARYSIL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.16, whereas JAIMATAG.BO's P/E ratio is -27.43. In terms of profitability, CARYSIL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to JAIMATAG.BO's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CARYSIL.NS is less volatile compared to JAIMATAG.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARYSIL.NS.Check JAIMATAG.BO's competition here

CARYSIL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CARYSIL.NS stands at 26.1B. In comparison, JAIPAN.BO has a market cap of 154.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CARYSIL.NS is priced at ₹918.20, while JAIPAN.BO trades at ₹25.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CARYSIL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.16, whereas JAIPAN.BO's P/E ratio is 28.39. In terms of profitability, CARYSIL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to JAIPAN.BO's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, CARYSIL.NS is less volatile compared to JAIPAN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARYSIL.NS.Check JAIPAN.BO's competition here

CARYSIL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CARYSIL.NS stands at 26.1B. In comparison, APIL.BO has a market cap of 135.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CARYSIL.NS is priced at ₹918.20, while APIL.BO trades at ₹37.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CARYSIL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.16, whereas APIL.BO's P/E ratio is -14.26. In terms of profitability, CARYSIL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to APIL.BO's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CARYSIL.NS is more volatile compared to APIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARYSIL.NS.Check APIL.BO's competition here

CARYSIL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CARYSIL.NS stands at 26.1B. In comparison, KAHAN.BO has a market cap of 133.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CARYSIL.NS is priced at ₹918.20, while KAHAN.BO trades at ₹49.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CARYSIL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.16, whereas KAHAN.BO's P/E ratio is 11.56. In terms of profitability, CARYSIL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KAHAN.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CARYSIL.NS is more volatile compared to KAHAN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARYSIL.NS.Check KAHAN.BO's competition here

CARYSIL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CARYSIL.NS stands at 26.1B. In comparison, SEASONST.BO has a market cap of 127.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CARYSIL.NS is priced at ₹918.20, while SEASONST.BO trades at ₹17.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CARYSIL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.16, whereas SEASONST.BO's P/E ratio is -170.00. In terms of profitability, CARYSIL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SEASONST.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CARYSIL.NS is less volatile compared to SEASONST.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARYSIL.NS.Check SEASONST.BO's competition here

CARYSIL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CARYSIL.NS stands at 26.1B. In comparison, PHOTOQUP.BO has a market cap of 96.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CARYSIL.NS is priced at ₹918.20, while PHOTOQUP.BO trades at ₹16.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CARYSIL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.16, whereas PHOTOQUP.BO's P/E ratio is 70.00. In terms of profitability, CARYSIL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PHOTOQUP.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CARYSIL.NS is less volatile compared to PHOTOQUP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARYSIL.NS.Check PHOTOQUP.BO's competition here

CARYSIL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CARYSIL.NS stands at 26.1B. In comparison, MPL.BO has a market cap of 95.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CARYSIL.NS is priced at ₹918.20, while MPL.BO trades at ₹7.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CARYSIL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.16, whereas MPL.BO's P/E ratio is -20.57. In terms of profitability, CARYSIL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MPL.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CARYSIL.NS is less volatile compared to MPL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARYSIL.NS.Check MPL.BO's competition here

CARYSIL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CARYSIL.NS stands at 26.1B. In comparison, KUWERIN.BO has a market cap of 73M. Regarding current trading prices, CARYSIL.NS is priced at ₹918.20, while KUWERIN.BO trades at ₹8.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CARYSIL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.16, whereas KUWERIN.BO's P/E ratio is 14.11. In terms of profitability, CARYSIL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KUWERIN.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CARYSIL.NS is less volatile compared to KUWERIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARYSIL.NS.Check KUWERIN.BO's competition here

CARYSIL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CARYSIL.NS stands at 26.1B. In comparison, GOLCA.BO has a market cap of 65.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CARYSIL.NS is priced at ₹918.20, while GOLCA.BO trades at ₹10.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CARYSIL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.16, whereas GOLCA.BO's P/E ratio is -43.91. In terms of profitability, CARYSIL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GOLCA.BO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CARYSIL.NS is less volatile compared to GOLCA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARYSIL.NS.Check GOLCA.BO's competition here

CARYSIL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CARYSIL.NS stands at 26.1B. In comparison, JIKIND.NS has a market cap of 47.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CARYSIL.NS is priced at ₹918.20, while JIKIND.NS trades at ₹0.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CARYSIL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.16, whereas JIKIND.NS's P/E ratio is -21.67. In terms of profitability, CARYSIL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to JIKIND.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CARYSIL.NS is less volatile compared to JIKIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARYSIL.NS.Check JIKIND.NS's competition here

CARYSIL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CARYSIL.NS stands at 26.1B. In comparison, WFL.NS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CARYSIL.NS is priced at ₹918.20, while WFL.NS trades at ₹269.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CARYSIL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.16, whereas WFL.NS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CARYSIL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WFL.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CARYSIL.NS is more volatile compared to WFL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARYSIL.NS.Check WFL.NS's competition here

CARYSIL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CARYSIL.NS stands at 26.1B. In comparison, EUREKAFORBE.BO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CARYSIL.NS is priced at ₹918.20, while EUREKAFORBE.BO trades at ₹502.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CARYSIL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.16, whereas EUREKAFORBE.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CARYSIL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to EUREKAFORBE.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CARYSIL.NS is less volatile compared to EUREKAFORBE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARYSIL.NS.Check EUREKAFORBE.BO's competition here

CARYSIL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CARYSIL.NS stands at 26.1B. In comparison, ELIL.BO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CARYSIL.NS is priced at ₹918.20, while ELIL.BO trades at ₹202.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CARYSIL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.16, whereas ELIL.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CARYSIL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ELIL.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CARYSIL.NS is more volatile compared to ELIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARYSIL.NS.Check ELIL.BO's competition here

CARYSIL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CARYSIL.NS stands at 26.1B. In comparison, SHIL.NS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CARYSIL.NS is priced at ₹918.20, while SHIL.NS trades at ₹272.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CARYSIL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.16, whereas SHIL.NS's P/E ratio is 9.77. In terms of profitability, CARYSIL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SHIL.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CARYSIL.NS is less volatile compared to SHIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARYSIL.NS.Check SHIL.NS's competition here

CARYSIL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CARYSIL.NS stands at 26.1B. In comparison, ACRYSIL.NS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CARYSIL.NS is priced at ₹918.20, while ACRYSIL.NS trades at ₹494.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CARYSIL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.16, whereas ACRYSIL.NS's P/E ratio is 21.59. In terms of profitability, CARYSIL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ACRYSIL.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CARYSIL.NS is more volatile compared to ACRYSIL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARYSIL.NS.Check ACRYSIL.NS's competition here

CARYSIL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CARYSIL.NS stands at 26.1B. In comparison, HSIL.NS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CARYSIL.NS is priced at ₹918.20, while HSIL.NS trades at ₹298.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CARYSIL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.16, whereas HSIL.NS's P/E ratio is 18.70. In terms of profitability, CARYSIL.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HSIL.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CARYSIL.NS is less volatile compared to HSIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARYSIL.NS.Check HSIL.NS's competition here