FDG Electric Vehicles Limited

CAOHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAOHF stands at 91.7B. In comparison, FYGGY has a market cap of 48.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CAOHF is priced at $0.15, while FYGGY trades at $1.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAOHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FYGGY's P/E ratio is 13.64. In terms of profitability, CAOHF's ROE is -14.04%, compared to FYGGY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CAOHF is more volatile compared to FYGGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAOHF.

CAOHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAOHF stands at 91.7B. In comparison, DNZOF has a market cap of 40B. Regarding current trading prices, CAOHF is priced at $0.15, while DNZOF trades at $14.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAOHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DNZOF's P/E ratio is 15.79. In terms of profitability, CAOHF's ROE is -14.04%, compared to DNZOF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CAOHF is more volatile compared to DNZOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAOHF.

CAOHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAOHF stands at 91.7B. In comparison, DNZOY has a market cap of 37.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CAOHF is priced at $0.15, while DNZOY trades at $13.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAOHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DNZOY's P/E ratio is 13.28. In terms of profitability, CAOHF's ROE is -14.04%, compared to DNZOY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CAOHF is more volatile compared to DNZOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAOHF.

CAOHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAOHF stands at 91.7B. In comparison, BRDCY has a market cap of 29.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CAOHF is priced at $0.15, while BRDCY trades at $21.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAOHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BRDCY's P/E ratio is 15.26. In terms of profitability, CAOHF's ROE is -14.04%, compared to BRDCY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CAOHF is more volatile compared to BRDCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAOHF.

CAOHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAOHF stands at 91.7B. In comparison, BRDCF has a market cap of 28.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CAOHF is priced at $0.15, while BRDCF trades at $42.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAOHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BRDCF's P/E ratio is 15.14. In terms of profitability, CAOHF's ROE is -14.04%, compared to BRDCF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CAOHF is more volatile compared to BRDCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAOHF.

CAOHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAOHF stands at 91.7B. In comparison, MGDDY has a market cap of 27B. Regarding current trading prices, CAOHF is priced at $0.15, while MGDDY trades at $19.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAOHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MGDDY's P/E ratio is 8.55. In terms of profitability, CAOHF's ROE is -14.04%, compared to MGDDY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CAOHF is more volatile compared to MGDDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAOHF.

CAOHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAOHF stands at 91.7B. In comparison, MGDDF has a market cap of 26.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CAOHF is priced at $0.15, while MGDDF trades at $37.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAOHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MGDDF's P/E ratio is 3.36. In terms of profitability, CAOHF's ROE is -14.04%, compared to MGDDF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CAOHF is more volatile compared to MGDDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAOHF.

CAOHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAOHF stands at 91.7B. In comparison, CTTAF has a market cap of 17.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CAOHF is priced at $0.15, while CTTAF trades at $89.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAOHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTTAF's P/E ratio is 13.49. In terms of profitability, CAOHF's ROE is -14.04%, compared to CTTAF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CAOHF is more volatile compared to CTTAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAOHF.

CAOHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAOHF stands at 91.7B. In comparison, CTTAY has a market cap of 17.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CAOHF is priced at $0.15, while CTTAY trades at $8.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAOHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTTAY's P/E ratio is 13.31. In terms of profitability, CAOHF's ROE is -14.04%, compared to CTTAY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CAOHF is more volatile compared to CTTAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAOHF.

CAOHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAOHF stands at 91.7B. In comparison, KNBHF has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CAOHF is priced at $0.15, while KNBHF trades at $101.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAOHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KNBHF's P/E ratio is 33.82. In terms of profitability, CAOHF's ROE is -14.04%, compared to KNBHF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CAOHF is more volatile compared to KNBHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAOHF.

CAOHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAOHF stands at 91.7B. In comparison, KNRRY has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CAOHF is priced at $0.15, while KNRRY trades at $25.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAOHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KNRRY's P/E ratio is 33.32. In terms of profitability, CAOHF's ROE is -14.04%, compared to KNRRY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CAOHF is more volatile compared to KNRRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAOHF.

CAOHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAOHF stands at 91.7B. In comparison, SMTOY has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CAOHF is priced at $0.15, while SMTOY trades at $20.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAOHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMTOY's P/E ratio is 11.98. In terms of profitability, CAOHF's ROE is -14.04%, compared to SMTOY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CAOHF is more volatile compared to SMTOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAOHF.

CAOHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAOHF stands at 91.7B. In comparison, PTAIY has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CAOHF is priced at $0.15, while PTAIY trades at $6.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAOHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTAIY's P/E ratio is 6.07. In terms of profitability, CAOHF's ROE is -14.04%, compared to PTAIY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CAOHF is more volatile compared to PTAIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAOHF.

CAOHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAOHF stands at 91.7B. In comparison, PTAIF has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CAOHF is priced at $0.15, while PTAIF trades at $0.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAOHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTAIF's P/E ratio is 6.00. In terms of profitability, CAOHF's ROE is -14.04%, compared to PTAIF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CAOHF is more volatile compared to PTAIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAOHF.

CAOHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAOHF stands at 91.7B. In comparison, HLLGY has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, CAOHF is priced at $0.15, while HLLGY trades at $49.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAOHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HLLGY's P/E ratio is 31.07. In terms of profitability, CAOHF's ROE is -14.04%, compared to HLLGY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CAOHF is more volatile compared to HLLGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAOHF.

CAOHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAOHF stands at 91.7B. In comparison, HLKHF has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CAOHF is priced at $0.15, while HLKHF trades at $92.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAOHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HLKHF's P/E ratio is 25.81. In terms of profitability, CAOHF's ROE is -14.04%, compared to HLKHF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CAOHF is more volatile compared to HLKHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAOHF.

CAOHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAOHF stands at 91.7B. In comparison, ASEKY has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CAOHF is priced at $0.15, while ASEKY trades at $12.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAOHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASEKY's P/E ratio is 12.76. In terms of profitability, CAOHF's ROE is -14.04%, compared to ASEKY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CAOHF is more volatile compared to ASEKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAOHF.

CAOHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAOHF stands at 91.7B. In comparison, ASEKF has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CAOHF is priced at $0.15, while ASEKF trades at $10.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAOHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASEKF's P/E ratio is 10.39. In terms of profitability, CAOHF's ROE is -14.04%, compared to ASEKF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CAOHF is more volatile compared to ASEKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAOHF.

CAOHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAOHF stands at 91.7B. In comparison, NGKSY has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CAOHF is priced at $0.15, while NGKSY trades at $17.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAOHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NGKSY's P/E ratio is 10.55. In terms of profitability, CAOHF's ROE is -14.04%, compared to NGKSY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CAOHF is more volatile compared to NGKSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAOHF.

CAOHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAOHF stands at 91.7B. In comparison, NGKSF has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, CAOHF is priced at $0.15, while NGKSF trades at $30.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAOHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NGKSF's P/E ratio is 9.33. In terms of profitability, CAOHF's ROE is -14.04%, compared to NGKSF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CAOHF is more volatile compared to NGKSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAOHF.

CAOHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAOHF stands at 91.7B. In comparison, SFFLY has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CAOHF is priced at $0.15, while SFFLY trades at $6.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAOHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SFFLY's P/E ratio is -4.72. In terms of profitability, CAOHF's ROE is -14.04%, compared to SFFLY's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CAOHF is more volatile compared to SFFLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAOHF.

CAOHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAOHF stands at 91.7B. In comparison, PLLIF has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CAOHF is priced at $0.15, while PLLIF trades at $5.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAOHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLLIF's P/E ratio is 9.73. In terms of profitability, CAOHF's ROE is -14.04%, compared to PLLIF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CAOHF is more volatile compared to PLLIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAOHF.

CAOHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAOHF stands at 91.7B. In comparison, YORUF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CAOHF is priced at $0.15, while YORUF trades at $25.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAOHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YORUF's P/E ratio is 8.59. In terms of profitability, CAOHF's ROE is -14.04%, compared to YORUF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CAOHF is more volatile compared to YORUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAOHF.

CAOHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAOHF stands at 91.7B. In comparison, FESTF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, CAOHF is priced at $0.15, while FESTF trades at $0.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAOHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FESTF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAOHF's ROE is -14.04%, compared to FESTF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CAOHF is more volatile compared to FESTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAOHF.

CAOHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAOHF stands at 91.7B. In comparison, KOTMF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CAOHF is priced at $0.15, while KOTMF trades at $13.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAOHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KOTMF's P/E ratio is 12.57. In terms of profitability, CAOHF's ROE is -14.04%, compared to KOTMF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CAOHF is more volatile compared to KOTMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAOHF.

CAOHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAOHF stands at 91.7B. In comparison, BRBOY has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CAOHF is priced at $0.15, while BRBOY trades at $12.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAOHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BRBOY's P/E ratio is 16.51. In terms of profitability, CAOHF's ROE is -14.04%, compared to BRBOY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CAOHF is more volatile compared to BRBOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAOHF.

CAOHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAOHF stands at 91.7B. In comparison, KOTMY has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CAOHF is priced at $0.15, while KOTMY trades at $12.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAOHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KOTMY's P/E ratio is 11.10. In terms of profitability, CAOHF's ROE is -14.04%, compared to KOTMY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CAOHF is more volatile compared to KOTMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAOHF.

CAOHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAOHF stands at 91.7B. In comparison, SCFLF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CAOHF is priced at $0.15, while SCFLF trades at $4.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAOHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCFLF's P/E ratio is 9.60. In terms of profitability, CAOHF's ROE is -14.04%, compared to SCFLF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CAOHF is more volatile compared to SCFLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAOHF.

CAOHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAOHF stands at 91.7B. In comparison, BRBOF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CAOHF is priced at $0.15, while BRBOF trades at $10.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAOHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BRBOF's P/E ratio is 11.86. In terms of profitability, CAOHF's ROE is -14.04%, compared to BRBOF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CAOHF is more volatile compared to BRBOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAOHF.

CAOHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAOHF stands at 91.7B. In comparison, MNTHY has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CAOHF is priced at $0.15, while MNTHY trades at $53.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAOHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MNTHY's P/E ratio is 9.62. In terms of profitability, CAOHF's ROE is -14.04%, compared to MNTHY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CAOHF is more volatile compared to MNTHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAOHF.

CAOHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAOHF stands at 91.7B. In comparison, YORUY has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CAOHF is priced at $0.15, while YORUY trades at $18.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAOHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YORUY's P/E ratio is 5.06. In terms of profitability, CAOHF's ROE is -14.04%, compared to YORUY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CAOHF is more volatile compared to YORUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAOHF.

CAOHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAOHF stands at 91.7B. In comparison, STAEY has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CAOHF is priced at $0.15, while STAEY trades at $9.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAOHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STAEY's P/E ratio is 18.19. In terms of profitability, CAOHF's ROE is -14.04%, compared to STAEY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CAOHF is more volatile compared to STAEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAOHF.

CAOHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAOHF stands at 91.7B. In comparison, LIMAF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CAOHF is priced at $0.15, while LIMAF trades at $45.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAOHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LIMAF's P/E ratio is 14.89. In terms of profitability, CAOHF's ROE is -14.04%, compared to LIMAF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CAOHF is more volatile compared to LIMAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAOHF.

CAOHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAOHF stands at 91.7B. In comparison, SMTUF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CAOHF is priced at $0.15, while SMTUF trades at $10.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAOHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMTUF's P/E ratio is 29.29. In terms of profitability, CAOHF's ROE is -14.04%, compared to SMTUF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CAOHF is more volatile compared to SMTUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAOHF.

CAOHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAOHF stands at 91.7B. In comparison, VLEEF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CAOHF is priced at $0.15, while VLEEF trades at $10.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAOHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VLEEF's P/E ratio is 14.53. In terms of profitability, CAOHF's ROE is -14.04%, compared to VLEEF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CAOHF is more volatile compared to VLEEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAOHF.

CAOHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAOHF stands at 91.7B. In comparison, VLEEY has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CAOHF is priced at $0.15, while VLEEY trades at $5.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAOHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VLEEY's P/E ratio is 13.84. In terms of profitability, CAOHF's ROE is -14.04%, compared to VLEEY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CAOHF is more volatile compared to VLEEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAOHF.

CAOHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAOHF stands at 91.7B. In comparison, STAEF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CAOHF is priced at $0.15, while STAEF trades at $16.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAOHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STAEF's P/E ratio is 14.40. In terms of profitability, CAOHF's ROE is -14.04%, compared to STAEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CAOHF is more volatile compared to STAEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAOHF.

CAOHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAOHF stands at 91.7B. In comparison, TDBOF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CAOHF is priced at $0.15, while TDBOF trades at $13.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAOHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TDBOF's P/E ratio is 21.18. In terms of profitability, CAOHF's ROE is -14.04%, compared to TDBOF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CAOHF is more volatile compared to TDBOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAOHF.

CAOHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAOHF stands at 91.7B. In comparison, NHKGF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CAOHF is priced at $0.15, while NHKGF trades at $11.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAOHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NHKGF's P/E ratio is 7.58. In terms of profitability, CAOHF's ROE is -14.04%, compared to NHKGF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CAOHF is more volatile compared to NHKGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAOHF.

CAOHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAOHF stands at 91.7B. In comparison, VTSCF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CAOHF is priced at $0.15, while VTSCF trades at $56.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAOHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VTSCF's P/E ratio is 82.35. In terms of profitability, CAOHF's ROE is -14.04%, compared to VTSCF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAOHF is more volatile compared to VTSCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAOHF.

CAOHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAOHF stands at 91.7B. In comparison, MNTHF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CAOHF is priced at $0.15, while MNTHF trades at $2.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAOHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MNTHF's P/E ratio is 7.14. In terms of profitability, CAOHF's ROE is -14.04%, compared to MNTHF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CAOHF is more volatile compared to MNTHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAOHF.

CAOHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAOHF stands at 91.7B. In comparison, MBUMF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CAOHF is priced at $0.15, while MBUMF trades at $18.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAOHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MBUMF's P/E ratio is 24.09. In terms of profitability, CAOHF's ROE is -14.04%, compared to MBUMF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CAOHF is more volatile compared to MBUMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAOHF.

CAOHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAOHF stands at 91.7B. In comparison, NPSKY has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CAOHF is priced at $0.15, while NPSKY trades at $9.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAOHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NPSKY's P/E ratio is 26.14. In terms of profitability, CAOHF's ROE is -14.04%, compared to NPSKY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CAOHF is more volatile compared to NPSKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAOHF.

CAOHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAOHF stands at 91.7B. In comparison, TGOSY has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CAOHF is priced at $0.15, while TGOSY trades at $33.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAOHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TGOSY's P/E ratio is 8.44. In terms of profitability, CAOHF's ROE is -14.04%, compared to TGOSY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CAOHF is more volatile compared to TGOSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAOHF.

CAOHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAOHF stands at 91.7B. In comparison, ARBFF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CAOHF is priced at $0.15, while ARBFF trades at $25.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAOHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARBFF's P/E ratio is 31.56. In terms of profitability, CAOHF's ROE is -14.04%, compared to ARBFF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CAOHF is more volatile compared to ARBFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAOHF.

CAOHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAOHF stands at 91.7B. In comparison, NPSKF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CAOHF is priced at $0.15, while NPSKF trades at $4.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAOHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NPSKF's P/E ratio is 30.57. In terms of profitability, CAOHF's ROE is -14.04%, compared to NPSKF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CAOHF is more volatile compared to NPSKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAOHF.

CAOHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAOHF stands at 91.7B. In comparison, FURCF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CAOHF is priced at $0.15, while FURCF trades at $9.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAOHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FURCF's P/E ratio is -7.02. In terms of profitability, CAOHF's ROE is -14.04%, compared to FURCF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CAOHF is more volatile compared to FURCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAOHF.

CAOHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAOHF stands at 91.7B. In comparison, JEHLY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CAOHF is priced at $0.15, while JEHLY trades at $20.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAOHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JEHLY's P/E ratio is 7.27. In terms of profitability, CAOHF's ROE is -14.04%, compared to JEHLY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CAOHF is more volatile compared to JEHLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAOHF.

CAOHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAOHF stands at 91.7B. In comparison, MBUMY has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CAOHF is priced at $0.15, while MBUMY trades at $7.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAOHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MBUMY's P/E ratio is 26.92. In terms of profitability, CAOHF's ROE is -14.04%, compared to MBUMY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CAOHF is more volatile compared to MBUMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAOHF.

CAOHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAOHF stands at 91.7B. In comparison, GMPUF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CAOHF is priced at $0.15, while GMPUF trades at $2.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAOHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GMPUF's P/E ratio is 9.22. In terms of profitability, CAOHF's ROE is -14.04%, compared to GMPUF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CAOHF is more volatile compared to GMPUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAOHF.

CAOHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAOHF stands at 91.7B. In comparison, UNIEF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CAOHF is priced at $0.15, while UNIEF trades at $35.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAOHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UNIEF's P/E ratio is 24.13. In terms of profitability, CAOHF's ROE is -14.04%, compared to UNIEF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CAOHF is more volatile compared to UNIEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAOHF.

CAOHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAOHF stands at 91.7B. In comparison, JELCF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CAOHF is priced at $0.15, while JELCF trades at $1.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAOHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JELCF's P/E ratio is 6.58. In terms of profitability, CAOHF's ROE is -14.04%, compared to JELCF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CAOHF is more volatile compared to JELCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAOHF.

CAOHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAOHF stands at 91.7B. In comparison, GUDDY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CAOHF is priced at $0.15, while GUDDY trades at $11.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAOHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GUDDY's P/E ratio is 25.22. In terms of profitability, CAOHF's ROE is -14.04%, compared to GUDDY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CAOHF is more volatile compared to GUDDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAOHF.

CAOHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAOHF stands at 91.7B. In comparison, NTXVF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CAOHF is priced at $0.15, while NTXVF trades at $0.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAOHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NTXVF's P/E ratio is 30.24. In terms of profitability, CAOHF's ROE is -14.04%, compared to NTXVF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CAOHF is more volatile compared to NTXVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAOHF.

CAOHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAOHF stands at 91.7B. In comparison, PASTF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CAOHF is priced at $0.15, while PASTF trades at $9.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAOHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PASTF's P/E ratio is 7.63. In terms of profitability, CAOHF's ROE is -14.04%, compared to PASTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CAOHF is more volatile compared to PASTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAOHF.

CAOHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAOHF stands at 91.7B. In comparison, NIFCY has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CAOHF is priced at $0.15, while NIFCY trades at $13.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAOHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NIFCY's P/E ratio is 25.94. In terms of profitability, CAOHF's ROE is -14.04%, compared to NIFCY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CAOHF is more volatile compared to NIFCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAOHF.

CAOHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAOHF stands at 91.7B. In comparison, NKRKF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CAOHF is priced at $0.15, while NKRKF trades at $8.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAOHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NKRKF's P/E ratio is -27.59. In terms of profitability, CAOHF's ROE is -14.04%, compared to NKRKF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CAOHF is more volatile compared to NKRKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAOHF.

CAOHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAOHF stands at 91.7B. In comparison, NKRKY has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, CAOHF is priced at $0.15, while NKRKY trades at $3.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAOHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NKRKY's P/E ratio is -24.50. In terms of profitability, CAOHF's ROE is -14.04%, compared to NKRKY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CAOHF is more volatile compared to NKRKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAOHF.

CAOHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAOHF stands at 91.7B. In comparison, ATNNF has a market cap of 960.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CAOHF is priced at $0.15, while ATNNF trades at $165.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAOHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATNNF's P/E ratio is 15.90. In terms of profitability, CAOHF's ROE is -14.04%, compared to ATNNF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CAOHF is more volatile compared to ATNNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAOHF.

CAOHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAOHF stands at 91.7B. In comparison, TIANF has a market cap of 939.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CAOHF is priced at $0.15, while TIANF trades at $0.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAOHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TIANF's P/E ratio is 3.79. In terms of profitability, CAOHF's ROE is -14.04%, compared to TIANF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CAOHF is more volatile compared to TIANF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAOHF.

CAOHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAOHF stands at 91.7B. In comparison, GUDHF has a market cap of 867.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CAOHF is priced at $0.15, while GUDHF trades at $6.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAOHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GUDHF's P/E ratio is 16.74. In terms of profitability, CAOHF's ROE is -14.04%, compared to GUDHF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CAOHF is more volatile compared to GUDHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAOHF.

CAOHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAOHF stands at 91.7B. In comparison, SFHLF has a market cap of 848M. Regarding current trading prices, CAOHF is priced at $0.15, while SFHLF trades at $18.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAOHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SFHLF's P/E ratio is 11.68. In terms of profitability, CAOHF's ROE is -14.04%, compared to SFHLF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CAOHF is more volatile compared to SFHLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAOHF.

CAOHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAOHF stands at 91.7B. In comparison, ABDDF has a market cap of 757.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CAOHF is priced at $0.15, while ABDDF trades at $33.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAOHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABDDF's P/E ratio is 143.48. In terms of profitability, CAOHF's ROE is -14.04%, compared to ABDDF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CAOHF is more volatile compared to ABDDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAOHF.

CAOHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAOHF stands at 91.7B. In comparison, FAURY has a market cap of 689.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CAOHF is priced at $0.15, while FAURY trades at $3.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAOHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FAURY's P/E ratio is -11.74. In terms of profitability, CAOHF's ROE is -14.04%, compared to FAURY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CAOHF is more volatile compared to FAURY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAOHF.

CAOHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAOHF stands at 91.7B. In comparison, PWRHF has a market cap of 647.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CAOHF is priced at $0.15, while PWRHF trades at $6.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAOHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PWRHF's P/E ratio is 40.25. In terms of profitability, CAOHF's ROE is -14.04%, compared to PWRHF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CAOHF is more volatile compared to PWRHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAOHF.

CAOHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAOHF stands at 91.7B. In comparison, FCVFF has a market cap of 509.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CAOHF is priced at $0.15, while FCVFF trades at $10.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAOHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FCVFF's P/E ratio is 9.33. In terms of profitability, CAOHF's ROE is -14.04%, compared to FCVFF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CAOHF is more volatile compared to FCVFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAOHF.

CAOHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAOHF stands at 91.7B. In comparison, MRETF has a market cap of 446.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CAOHF is priced at $0.15, while MRETF trades at $6.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAOHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MRETF's P/E ratio is -10.77. In terms of profitability, CAOHF's ROE is -14.04%, compared to MRETF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CAOHF is more volatile compared to MRETF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAOHF.

CAOHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAOHF stands at 91.7B. In comparison, TCISF has a market cap of 420M. Regarding current trading prices, CAOHF is priced at $0.15, while TCISF trades at $12.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAOHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TCISF's P/E ratio is 9.35. In terms of profitability, CAOHF's ROE is -14.04%, compared to TCISF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CAOHF is more volatile compared to TCISF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAOHF.

CAOHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAOHF stands at 91.7B. In comparison, SAEOF has a market cap of 401.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CAOHF is priced at $0.15, while SAEOF trades at $3.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAOHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SAEOF's P/E ratio is -0.41. In terms of profitability, CAOHF's ROE is -14.04%, compared to SAEOF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CAOHF is more volatile compared to SAEOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAOHF.

CAOHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAOHF stands at 91.7B. In comparison, VTSCY has a market cap of 400.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CAOHF is priced at $0.15, while VTSCY trades at $10.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAOHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VTSCY's P/E ratio is 76.92. In terms of profitability, CAOHF's ROE is -14.04%, compared to VTSCY's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAOHF is more volatile compared to VTSCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAOHF.

CAOHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAOHF stands at 91.7B. In comparison, UFMG has a market cap of 386M. Regarding current trading prices, CAOHF is priced at $0.15, while UFMG trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAOHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UFMG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAOHF's ROE is -14.04%, compared to UFMG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CAOHF is more volatile compared to UFMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAOHF.

CAOHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAOHF stands at 91.7B. In comparison, NMAKF has a market cap of 338.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CAOHF is priced at $0.15, while NMAKF trades at $0.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAOHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NMAKF's P/E ratio is -11.60. In terms of profitability, CAOHF's ROE is -14.04%, compared to NMAKF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CAOHF is more volatile compared to NMAKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAOHF.

CAOHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAOHF stands at 91.7B. In comparison, ELLRY has a market cap of 323.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CAOHF is priced at $0.15, while ELLRY trades at $2.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAOHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELLRY's P/E ratio is -1.92. In terms of profitability, CAOHF's ROE is -14.04%, compared to ELLRY's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CAOHF is more volatile compared to ELLRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAOHF.

CAOHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAOHF stands at 91.7B. In comparison, NPSGF has a market cap of 294.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CAOHF is priced at $0.15, while NPSGF trades at $3.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAOHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NPSGF's P/E ratio is 6.31. In terms of profitability, CAOHF's ROE is -14.04%, compared to NPSGF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CAOHF is more volatile compared to NPSGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAOHF.

CAOHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAOHF stands at 91.7B. In comparison, EGKLF has a market cap of 285.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CAOHF is priced at $0.15, while EGKLF trades at $4.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAOHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EGKLF's P/E ratio is -1.70. In terms of profitability, CAOHF's ROE is -14.04%, compared to EGKLF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CAOHF is more volatile compared to EGKLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAOHF.

CAOHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAOHF stands at 91.7B. In comparison, NPSGY has a market cap of 270M. Regarding current trading prices, CAOHF is priced at $0.15, while NPSGY trades at $2.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAOHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NPSGY's P/E ratio is -1.77. In terms of profitability, CAOHF's ROE is -14.04%, compared to NPSGY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CAOHF is more volatile compared to NPSGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAOHF.

CAOHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAOHF stands at 91.7B. In comparison, IOCJY has a market cap of 247.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CAOHF is priced at $0.15, while IOCJY trades at $0.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAOHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IOCJY's P/E ratio is 6.11. In terms of profitability, CAOHF's ROE is -14.04%, compared to IOCJY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CAOHF is more volatile compared to IOCJY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAOHF.

CAOHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAOHF stands at 91.7B. In comparison, XNGIF has a market cap of 244.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CAOHF is priced at $0.15, while XNGIF trades at $0.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAOHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XNGIF's P/E ratio is 6.43. In terms of profitability, CAOHF's ROE is -14.04%, compared to XNGIF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CAOHF is more volatile compared to XNGIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAOHF.

CAOHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAOHF stands at 91.7B. In comparison, CMMCF has a market cap of 221.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CAOHF is priced at $0.15, while CMMCF trades at $0.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAOHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMMCF's P/E ratio is -16.00. In terms of profitability, CAOHF's ROE is -14.04%, compared to CMMCF's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CAOHF is more volatile compared to CMMCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAOHF.

CAOHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAOHF stands at 91.7B. In comparison, AKBIF has a market cap of 215.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CAOHF is priced at $0.15, while AKBIF trades at $0.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAOHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AKBIF's P/E ratio is 11.36. In terms of profitability, CAOHF's ROE is -14.04%, compared to AKBIF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CAOHF is more volatile compared to AKBIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAOHF.

CAOHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAOHF stands at 91.7B. In comparison, EXCOF has a market cap of 185.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CAOHF is priced at $0.15, while EXCOF trades at $4.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAOHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXCOF's P/E ratio is 9.68. In terms of profitability, CAOHF's ROE is -14.04%, compared to EXCOF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CAOHF is more volatile compared to EXCOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAOHF.

CAOHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAOHF stands at 91.7B. In comparison, AMGRF has a market cap of 162.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CAOHF is priced at $0.15, while AMGRF trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAOHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMGRF's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, CAOHF's ROE is -14.04%, compared to AMGRF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CAOHF is more volatile compared to AMGRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAOHF.

CAOHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAOHF stands at 91.7B. In comparison, HWAFF has a market cap of 158M. Regarding current trading prices, CAOHF is priced at $0.15, while HWAFF trades at $0.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAOHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HWAFF's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, CAOHF's ROE is -14.04%, compared to HWAFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CAOHF is more volatile compared to HWAFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAOHF.

CAOHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAOHF stands at 91.7B. In comparison, WLMTF has a market cap of 152.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CAOHF is priced at $0.15, while WLMTF trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAOHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WLMTF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAOHF's ROE is -14.04%, compared to WLMTF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CAOHF is more volatile compared to WLMTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAOHF.

CAOHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAOHF stands at 91.7B. In comparison, SCTH has a market cap of 139.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CAOHF is priced at $0.15, while SCTH trades at $3.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAOHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCTH's P/E ratio is -395.00. In terms of profitability, CAOHF's ROE is -14.04%, compared to SCTH's ROE of +1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CAOHF is more volatile compared to SCTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAOHF.

CAOHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAOHF stands at 91.7B. In comparison, KGAUF has a market cap of 130.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CAOHF is priced at $0.15, while KGAUF trades at $0.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAOHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KGAUF's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, CAOHF's ROE is -14.04%, compared to KGAUF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CAOHF is more volatile compared to KGAUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAOHF.

CAOHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAOHF stands at 91.7B. In comparison, LEAT has a market cap of 51.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CAOHF is priced at $0.15, while LEAT trades at $8.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAOHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LEAT's P/E ratio is -165.60. In terms of profitability, CAOHF's ROE is -14.04%, compared to LEAT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CAOHF is more volatile compared to LEAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAOHF.

CAOHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAOHF stands at 91.7B. In comparison, STSGF has a market cap of 38.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CAOHF is priced at $0.15, while STSGF trades at $6.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAOHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STSGF's P/E ratio is 19.36. In terms of profitability, CAOHF's ROE is -14.04%, compared to STSGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CAOHF is more volatile compared to STSGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAOHF.

CAOHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAOHF stands at 91.7B. In comparison, NWFAF has a market cap of 37.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CAOHF is priced at $0.15, while NWFAF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAOHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NWFAF's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, CAOHF's ROE is -14.04%, compared to NWFAF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CAOHF is more volatile compared to NWFAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAOHF.

CAOHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAOHF stands at 91.7B. In comparison, VOAXF has a market cap of 27M. Regarding current trading prices, CAOHF is priced at $0.15, while VOAXF trades at $1.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAOHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VOAXF's P/E ratio is -3.07. In terms of profitability, CAOHF's ROE is -14.04%, compared to VOAXF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CAOHF is more volatile compared to VOAXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAOHF.

CAOHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAOHF stands at 91.7B. In comparison, CREVF has a market cap of 23.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CAOHF is priced at $0.15, while CREVF trades at $0.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAOHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CREVF's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, CAOHF's ROE is -14.04%, compared to CREVF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CAOHF is more volatile compared to CREVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAOHF.

CAOHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAOHF stands at 91.7B. In comparison, CCEGF has a market cap of 20.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CAOHF is priced at $0.15, while CCEGF trades at $0.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAOHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CCEGF's P/E ratio is -9.33. In terms of profitability, CAOHF's ROE is -14.04%, compared to CCEGF's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, CAOHF is more volatile compared to CCEGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAOHF.

CAOHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAOHF stands at 91.7B. In comparison, ATHHF has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CAOHF is priced at $0.15, while ATHHF trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAOHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATHHF's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, CAOHF's ROE is -14.04%, compared to ATHHF's ROE of +1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CAOHF is more volatile compared to ATHHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAOHF.

CAOHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAOHF stands at 91.7B. In comparison, OPTI has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CAOHF is priced at $0.15, while OPTI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAOHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OPTI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CAOHF's ROE is -14.04%, compared to OPTI's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, CAOHF is more volatile compared to OPTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAOHF.

CAOHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAOHF stands at 91.7B. In comparison, AMTY has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CAOHF is priced at $0.15, while AMTY trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAOHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMTY's P/E ratio is 3.70. In terms of profitability, CAOHF's ROE is -14.04%, compared to AMTY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CAOHF is more volatile compared to AMTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAOHF.

CAOHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAOHF stands at 91.7B. In comparison, NFGRF has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CAOHF is priced at $0.15, while NFGRF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAOHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NFGRF's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, CAOHF's ROE is -14.04%, compared to NFGRF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CAOHF is more volatile compared to NFGRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAOHF.

CAOHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAOHF stands at 91.7B. In comparison, AFFL has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CAOHF is priced at $0.15, while AFFL trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAOHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AFFL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CAOHF's ROE is -14.04%, compared to AFFL's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, CAOHF is more volatile compared to AFFL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAOHF.

CAOHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAOHF stands at 91.7B. In comparison, SPKTF has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CAOHF is priced at $0.15, while SPKTF trades at $0.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAOHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPKTF's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, CAOHF's ROE is -14.04%, compared to SPKTF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CAOHF is more volatile compared to SPKTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAOHF.

CAOHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CAOHF stands at 91.7B. In comparison, CDTI has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CAOHF is priced at $0.15, while CDTI trades at $0.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CAOHF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CDTI's P/E ratio is -0.68. In terms of profitability, CAOHF's ROE is -14.04%, compared to CDTI's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CAOHF is more volatile compared to CDTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAOHF.