Canon Inc.
Canon Inc. (CAJPY) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CAJPY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Computer Hardware Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAJPY | $29.44 | +0.07% | 27.6B | 23.76 | $1.24 | +3.13% |
| QUCCF | $12.25 | +0.00% | 341.9B | 10.21 | $1.20 | +18.07% |
| CAJFF | $29.30 | -0.85% | 26.4B | 23.63 | $1.24 | +5.36% |
| LNVGY | $28.30 | +1.43% | 17.6B | 13.38 | $2.12 | +3.44% |
| LNVGF | $1.42 | +8.40% | 17.6B | 12.89 | $0.11 | +3.53% |
| SEKEF | $12.98 | +0.00% | 4.2B | 11.28 | $1.15 | +3.86% |
| SEKEY | $6.39 | -1.39% | 4.1B | 11.14 | $0.57 | +3.25% |
| ACEYY | $5.14 | +0.00% | 3.1B | 34.27 | $0.15 | +5.02% |
| ASUUY | $94.00 | +0.00% | 2.8B | 10.59 | $8.88 | +6.14% |
| LGNRF | $1.13 | +0.00% | 2.5B | -4.52 | -$0.25 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
CAJPY vs QUCCF Comparison August 2025
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 27.6B. In comparison, QUCCF has a market cap of 341.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $29.44, while QUCCF trades at $12.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.76, whereas QUCCF's P/E ratio is 10.21. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to QUCCF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is less volatile compared to QUCCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.Check QUCCF's competition here
CAJPY vs CAJFF Comparison August 2025
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 27.6B. In comparison, CAJFF has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $29.44, while CAJFF trades at $29.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.76, whereas CAJFF's P/E ratio is 23.63. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CAJFF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is more volatile compared to CAJFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.Check CAJFF's competition here
CAJPY vs LNVGY Comparison August 2025
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 27.6B. In comparison, LNVGY has a market cap of 17.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $29.44, while LNVGY trades at $28.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.76, whereas LNVGY's P/E ratio is 13.38. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LNVGY's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is less volatile compared to LNVGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.Check LNVGY's competition here
CAJPY vs LNVGF Comparison August 2025
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 27.6B. In comparison, LNVGF has a market cap of 17.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $29.44, while LNVGF trades at $1.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.76, whereas LNVGF's P/E ratio is 12.89. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LNVGF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is more volatile compared to LNVGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.Check LNVGF's competition here
CAJPY vs SEKEF Comparison August 2025
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 27.6B. In comparison, SEKEF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $29.44, while SEKEF trades at $12.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.76, whereas SEKEF's P/E ratio is 11.28. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SEKEF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is less volatile compared to SEKEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.Check SEKEF's competition here
CAJPY vs SEKEY Comparison August 2025
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 27.6B. In comparison, SEKEY has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $29.44, while SEKEY trades at $6.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.76, whereas SEKEY's P/E ratio is 11.14. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SEKEY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is less volatile compared to SEKEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.Check SEKEY's competition here
CAJPY vs ACEYY Comparison August 2025
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 27.6B. In comparison, ACEYY has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $29.44, while ACEYY trades at $5.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.76, whereas ACEYY's P/E ratio is 34.27. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ACEYY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is less volatile compared to ACEYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.Check ACEYY's competition here
CAJPY vs ASUUY Comparison August 2025
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 27.6B. In comparison, ASUUY has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $29.44, while ASUUY trades at $94.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.76, whereas ASUUY's P/E ratio is 10.59. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ASUUY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is more volatile compared to ASUUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.Check ASUUY's competition here
CAJPY vs LGNRF Comparison August 2025
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 27.6B. In comparison, LGNRF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $29.44, while LGNRF trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.76, whereas LGNRF's P/E ratio is -4.52. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LGNRF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is less volatile compared to LGNRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.Check LGNRF's competition here
CAJPY vs FXCOF Comparison August 2025
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 27.6B. In comparison, FXCOF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $29.44, while FXCOF trades at $1.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.76, whereas FXCOF's P/E ratio is 17.60. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FXCOF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is more volatile compared to FXCOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.Check FXCOF's competition here
CAJPY vs TSHTY Comparison August 2025
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 27.6B. In comparison, TSHTY has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $29.44, while TSHTY trades at $10.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.76, whereas TSHTY's P/E ratio is 5.34. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TSHTY's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is more volatile compared to TSHTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.Check TSHTY's competition here
CAJPY vs DRSHF Comparison August 2025
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 27.6B. In comparison, DRSHF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $29.44, while DRSHF trades at $2.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.76, whereas DRSHF's P/E ratio is 235.00. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DRSHF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is less volatile compared to DRSHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.Check DRSHF's competition here
CAJPY vs WACMY Comparison August 2025
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 27.6B. In comparison, WACMY has a market cap of 661.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $29.44, while WACMY trades at $4.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.76, whereas WACMY's P/E ratio is 17.74. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WACMY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is less volatile compared to WACMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.Check WACMY's competition here
CAJPY vs WACMF Comparison August 2025
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 27.6B. In comparison, WACMF has a market cap of 618M. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $29.44, while WACMF trades at $4.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.76, whereas WACMF's P/E ratio is 18.38. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WACMF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is less volatile compared to WACMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.Check WACMF's competition here
CAJPY vs PCPPF Comparison August 2025
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 27.6B. In comparison, PCPPF has a market cap of 384M. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $29.44, while PCPPF trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.76, whereas PCPPF's P/E ratio is 8.33. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PCPPF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is less volatile compared to PCPPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.Check PCPPF's competition here
CAJPY vs JFEYF Comparison August 2025
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 27.6B. In comparison, JFEYF has a market cap of 292.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $29.44, while JFEYF trades at $9.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.76, whereas JFEYF's P/E ratio is 4.98. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to JFEYF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is less volatile compared to JFEYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.Check JFEYF's competition here
CAJPY vs TAKOF Comparison August 2025
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 27.6B. In comparison, TAKOF has a market cap of 253.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $29.44, while TAKOF trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.76, whereas TAKOF's P/E ratio is -21.53. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TAKOF's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is less volatile compared to TAKOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.Check TAKOF's competition here
CAJPY vs AOMUF Comparison August 2025
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 27.6B. In comparison, AOMUF has a market cap of 153.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $29.44, while AOMUF trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.76, whereas AOMUF's P/E ratio is -10.62. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AOMUF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is more volatile compared to AOMUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.Check AOMUF's competition here
CAJPY vs SCTQ Comparison August 2025
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 27.6B. In comparison, SCTQ has a market cap of 98.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $29.44, while SCTQ trades at $2.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.76, whereas SCTQ's P/E ratio is 15.64. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SCTQ's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is more volatile compared to SCTQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.Check SCTQ's competition here
CAJPY vs TBIIF Comparison August 2025
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 27.6B. In comparison, TBIIF has a market cap of 83M. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $29.44, while TBIIF trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.76, whereas TBIIF's P/E ratio is 11.84. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TBIIF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is more volatile compared to TBIIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.Check TBIIF's competition here
CAJPY vs FRIIF Comparison August 2025
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 27.6B. In comparison, FRIIF has a market cap of 79.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $29.44, while FRIIF trades at $12.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.76, whereas FRIIF's P/E ratio is 6.10. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FRIIF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is less volatile compared to FRIIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.Check FRIIF's competition here
CAJPY vs XAARF Comparison August 2025
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 27.6B. In comparison, XAARF has a market cap of 72.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $29.44, while XAARF trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.76, whereas XAARF's P/E ratio is -5.11. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to XAARF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is less volatile compared to XAARF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.Check XAARF's competition here
CAJPY vs CREAF Comparison August 2025
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 27.6B. In comparison, CREAF has a market cap of 39.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $29.44, while CREAF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.76, whereas CREAF's P/E ratio is -3.11. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CREAF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is more volatile compared to CREAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.Check CREAF's competition here
CAJPY vs AOTOF Comparison August 2025
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 27.6B. In comparison, AOTOF has a market cap of 33.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $29.44, while AOTOF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.76, whereas AOTOF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AOTOF's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is more volatile compared to AOTOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.Check AOTOF's competition here
CAJPY vs PRWYF Comparison August 2025
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 27.6B. In comparison, PRWYF has a market cap of 31M. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $29.44, while PRWYF trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.76, whereas PRWYF's P/E ratio is -1.67. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PRWYF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is less volatile compared to PRWYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.Check PRWYF's competition here
CAJPY vs AITX Comparison August 2025
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 27.6B. In comparison, AITX has a market cap of 14.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $29.44, while AITX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.76, whereas AITX's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AITX's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is less volatile compared to AITX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.Check AITX's competition here
CAJPY vs EVRC Comparison August 2025
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 27.6B. In comparison, EVRC has a market cap of 9.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $29.44, while EVRC trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.76, whereas EVRC's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to EVRC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is more volatile compared to EVRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.Check EVRC's competition here
CAJPY vs CCUR Comparison August 2025
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 27.6B. In comparison, CCUR has a market cap of 7.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $29.44, while CCUR trades at $2,500.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.76, whereas CCUR's P/E ratio is -4.69. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CCUR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is less volatile compared to CCUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.Check CCUR's competition here
CAJPY vs FNTTF Comparison August 2025
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 27.6B. In comparison, FNTTF has a market cap of 4.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $29.44, while FNTTF trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.76, whereas FNTTF's P/E ratio is -1.60. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FNTTF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is less volatile compared to FNTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.Check FNTTF's competition here
CAJPY vs VRTK Comparison August 2025
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 27.6B. In comparison, VRTK has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $29.44, while VRTK trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.76, whereas VRTK's P/E ratio is 20.50. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VRTK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is less volatile compared to VRTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.Check VRTK's competition here
CAJPY vs TKSTF Comparison August 2025
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 27.6B. In comparison, TKSTF has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $29.44, while TKSTF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.76, whereas TKSTF's P/E ratio is -4.10. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TKSTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is more volatile compared to TKSTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.Check TKSTF's competition here
CAJPY vs YRLLF Comparison August 2025
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 27.6B. In comparison, YRLLF has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $29.44, while YRLLF trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.76, whereas YRLLF's P/E ratio is -8.98. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to YRLLF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is less volatile compared to YRLLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.Check YRLLF's competition here
CAJPY vs JLMKF Comparison August 2025
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 27.6B. In comparison, JLMKF has a market cap of 919.3K. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $29.44, while JLMKF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.76, whereas JLMKF's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to JLMKF's ROE of -2.79%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is less volatile compared to JLMKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.Check JLMKF's competition here
CAJPY vs VMRI Comparison August 2025
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 27.6B. In comparison, VMRI has a market cap of 695.7K. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $29.44, while VMRI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.76, whereas VMRI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VMRI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is less volatile compared to VMRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.Check VMRI's competition here
CAJPY vs DDDX Comparison August 2025
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 27.6B. In comparison, DDDX has a market cap of 521.5K. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $29.44, while DDDX trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.76, whereas DDDX's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DDDX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is less volatile compared to DDDX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.Check DDDX's competition here
CAJPY vs ITOX Comparison August 2025
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 27.6B. In comparison, ITOX has a market cap of 396.4K. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $29.44, while ITOX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.76, whereas ITOX's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ITOX's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is less volatile compared to ITOX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.Check ITOX's competition here
CAJPY vs DWDZF Comparison August 2025
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 27.6B. In comparison, DWDZF has a market cap of 205K. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $29.44, while DWDZF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.76, whereas DWDZF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DWDZF's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is less volatile compared to DWDZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.Check DWDZF's competition here
CAJPY vs CRTG Comparison August 2025
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 27.6B. In comparison, CRTG has a market cap of 172.7K. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $29.44, while CRTG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.76, whereas CRTG's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CRTG's ROE of +1.64%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is less volatile compared to CRTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.Check CRTG's competition here
CAJPY vs HAUP Comparison August 2025
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 27.6B. In comparison, HAUP has a market cap of 123.5K. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $29.44, while HAUP trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.76, whereas HAUP's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HAUP's ROE of +92.50%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is less volatile compared to HAUP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.Check HAUP's competition here
CAJPY vs GOSY Comparison August 2025
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 27.6B. In comparison, GOSY has a market cap of 82.5K. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $29.44, while GOSY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.76, whereas GOSY's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GOSY's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is more volatile compared to GOSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.Check GOSY's competition here
CAJPY vs EUOT Comparison August 2025
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 27.6B. In comparison, EUOT has a market cap of 48K. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $29.44, while EUOT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.76, whereas EUOT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to EUOT's ROE of +28.93%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is less volatile compared to EUOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.Check EUOT's competition here
CAJPY vs RDRSF Comparison August 2025
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 27.6B. In comparison, RDRSF has a market cap of 17.7K. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $29.44, while RDRSF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.76, whereas RDRSF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RDRSF's ROE of +2.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is less volatile compared to RDRSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.Check RDRSF's competition here
CAJPY vs MDEA Comparison August 2025
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 27.6B. In comparison, MDEA has a market cap of 13.2K. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $29.44, while MDEA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.76, whereas MDEA's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MDEA's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is less volatile compared to MDEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.Check MDEA's competition here
CAJPY vs SNIOF Comparison August 2025
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 27.6B. In comparison, SNIOF has a market cap of 11.3K. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $29.44, while SNIOF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.76, whereas SNIOF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SNIOF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is less volatile compared to SNIOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.Check SNIOF's competition here
CAJPY vs NADA Comparison August 2025
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 27.6B. In comparison, NADA has a market cap of 10.4K. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $29.44, while NADA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.76, whereas NADA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NADA's ROE of -8.82%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is less volatile compared to NADA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.Check NADA's competition here
CAJPY vs CBEX Comparison August 2025
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 27.6B. In comparison, CBEX has a market cap of 2.3K. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $29.44, while CBEX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.76, whereas CBEX's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CBEX's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is more volatile compared to CBEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.Check CBEX's competition here
CAJPY vs VOIS Comparison August 2025
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 27.6B. In comparison, VOIS has a market cap of 1.8K. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $29.44, while VOIS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.76, whereas VOIS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VOIS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is less volatile compared to VOIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.Check VOIS's competition here
CAJPY vs VIDE Comparison August 2025
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 27.6B. In comparison, VIDE has a market cap of 1.8K. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $29.44, while VIDE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.76, whereas VIDE's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VIDE's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is less volatile compared to VIDE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.Check VIDE's competition here
CAJPY vs MCZAF Comparison August 2025
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 27.6B. In comparison, MCZAF has a market cap of 735. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $29.44, while MCZAF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.76, whereas MCZAF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MCZAF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is less volatile compared to MCZAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.Check MCZAF's competition here
CAJPY vs SOSO Comparison August 2025
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 27.6B. In comparison, SOSO has a market cap of 389. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $29.44, while SOSO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.76, whereas SOSO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SOSO's ROE of -1.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is less volatile compared to SOSO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.Check SOSO's competition here
CAJPY vs IWRS Comparison August 2025
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 27.6B. In comparison, IWRS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $29.44, while IWRS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.76, whereas IWRS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to IWRS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is less volatile compared to IWRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.Check IWRS's competition here