Canon Inc.
Canon Inc. CAJPY Peers
See (CAJPY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Computer Hardware Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAJPY | $28.68 | +0.88% | 26.5B | 22.94 | $1.25 | +3.17% |
| QUCCF | $12.25 | +0.00% | 362.9B | 10.21 | $1.20 | +17.75% |
| CAJFF | $27.55 | +0.00% | 25.5B | 21.87 | $1.26 | +3.72% |
| LNVGY | $24.12 | -0.12% | 15B | 11.37 | $2.12 | +4.01% |
| LNVGF | $1.19 | -2.06% | 14.8B | 10.82 | $0.11 | +4.14% |
| SEKEY | $6.50 | +0.00% | 4.2B | 11.19 | $0.58 | +3.21% |
| SEKEF | $11.90 | +0.00% | 3.8B | 10.35 | $1.15 | +4.23% |
| ASUUY | $98.69 | +0.00% | 2.9B | 11.11 | $8.88 | +2.62% |
| LGNRF | $1.13 | +0.00% | 2.7B | -4.52 | -$0.25 | N/A |
| FXCOF | $1.76 | +0.00% | 2.5B | 17.60 | $0.10 | +2.72% |
Stock Comparison
CAJPY vs QUCCF Comparison
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 26.5B. In comparison, QUCCF has a market cap of 362.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $28.68, while QUCCF trades at $12.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.94, whereas QUCCF's P/E ratio is 10.21. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to QUCCF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is less volatile compared to QUCCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.
CAJPY vs CAJFF Comparison
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 26.5B. In comparison, CAJFF has a market cap of 25.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $28.68, while CAJFF trades at $27.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.94, whereas CAJFF's P/E ratio is 21.87. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CAJFF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is less volatile compared to CAJFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.
CAJPY vs LNVGY Comparison
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 26.5B. In comparison, LNVGY has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $28.68, while LNVGY trades at $24.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.94, whereas LNVGY's P/E ratio is 11.37. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LNVGY's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is less volatile compared to LNVGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.
CAJPY vs LNVGF Comparison
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 26.5B. In comparison, LNVGF has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $28.68, while LNVGF trades at $1.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.94, whereas LNVGF's P/E ratio is 10.82. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LNVGF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is less volatile compared to LNVGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.
CAJPY vs SEKEY Comparison
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 26.5B. In comparison, SEKEY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $28.68, while SEKEY trades at $6.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.94, whereas SEKEY's P/E ratio is 11.19. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SEKEY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is less volatile compared to SEKEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.
CAJPY vs SEKEF Comparison
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 26.5B. In comparison, SEKEF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $28.68, while SEKEF trades at $11.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.94, whereas SEKEF's P/E ratio is 10.35. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SEKEF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is more volatile compared to SEKEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.
CAJPY vs ASUUY Comparison
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 26.5B. In comparison, ASUUY has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $28.68, while ASUUY trades at $98.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.94, whereas ASUUY's P/E ratio is 11.11. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ASUUY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is more volatile compared to ASUUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.
CAJPY vs LGNRF Comparison
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 26.5B. In comparison, LGNRF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $28.68, while LGNRF trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.94, whereas LGNRF's P/E ratio is -4.52. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LGNRF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is less volatile compared to LGNRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.
CAJPY vs FXCOF Comparison
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 26.5B. In comparison, FXCOF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $28.68, while FXCOF trades at $1.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.94, whereas FXCOF's P/E ratio is 17.60. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FXCOF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is more volatile compared to FXCOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.
CAJPY vs TSHTY Comparison
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 26.5B. In comparison, TSHTY has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $28.68, while TSHTY trades at $9.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.94, whereas TSHTY's P/E ratio is 5.08. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TSHTY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is less volatile compared to TSHTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.
CAJPY vs DRSHF Comparison
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 26.5B. In comparison, DRSHF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $28.68, while DRSHF trades at $1.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.94, whereas DRSHF's P/E ratio is 163.05. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DRSHF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is less volatile compared to DRSHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.
CAJPY vs ACEYY Comparison
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 26.5B. In comparison, ACEYY has a market cap of 618.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $28.68, while ACEYY trades at $5.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.94, whereas ACEYY's P/E ratio is 34.27. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ACEYY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is less volatile compared to ACEYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.
CAJPY vs WACMY Comparison
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 26.5B. In comparison, WACMY has a market cap of 613.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $28.68, while WACMY trades at $4.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.94, whereas WACMY's P/E ratio is 2.61. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WACMY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is less volatile compared to WACMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.
CAJPY vs WACMF Comparison
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 26.5B. In comparison, WACMF has a market cap of 560.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $28.68, while WACMF trades at $4.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.94, whereas WACMF's P/E ratio is 2.45. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WACMF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is less volatile compared to WACMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.
CAJPY vs PCPPF Comparison
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 26.5B. In comparison, PCPPF has a market cap of 384M. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $28.68, while PCPPF trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.94, whereas PCPPF's P/E ratio is 8.33. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PCPPF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is less volatile compared to PCPPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.
CAJPY vs JFEYF Comparison
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 26.5B. In comparison, JFEYF has a market cap of 292.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $28.68, while JFEYF trades at $9.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.94, whereas JFEYF's P/E ratio is 4.98. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to JFEYF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is less volatile compared to JFEYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.
CAJPY vs AOMUF Comparison
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 26.5B. In comparison, AOMUF has a market cap of 153.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $28.68, while AOMUF trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.94, whereas AOMUF's P/E ratio is -10.62. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AOMUF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is more volatile compared to AOMUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.
CAJPY vs TBIIF Comparison
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 26.5B. In comparison, TBIIF has a market cap of 119.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $28.68, while TBIIF trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.94, whereas TBIIF's P/E ratio is 51.20. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TBIIF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is less volatile compared to TBIIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.
CAJPY vs TAKOF Comparison
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 26.5B. In comparison, TAKOF has a market cap of 109.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $28.68, while TAKOF trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.94, whereas TAKOF's P/E ratio is -7.33. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TAKOF's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is less volatile compared to TAKOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.
CAJPY vs SCTQ Comparison
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 26.5B. In comparison, SCTQ has a market cap of 98.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $28.68, while SCTQ trades at $2.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.94, whereas SCTQ's P/E ratio is 15.64. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SCTQ's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is more volatile compared to SCTQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.
CAJPY vs FRIIF Comparison
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 26.5B. In comparison, FRIIF has a market cap of 79.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $28.68, while FRIIF trades at $12.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.94, whereas FRIIF's P/E ratio is 6.28. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FRIIF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is less volatile compared to FRIIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.
CAJPY vs XAARF Comparison
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 26.5B. In comparison, XAARF has a market cap of 72.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $28.68, while XAARF trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.94, whereas XAARF's P/E ratio is -5.11. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to XAARF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is less volatile compared to XAARF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.
CAJPY vs CREAF Comparison
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 26.5B. In comparison, CREAF has a market cap of 46.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $28.68, while CREAF trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.94, whereas CREAF's P/E ratio is -3.67. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CREAF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is less volatile compared to CREAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.
CAJPY vs AOTOF Comparison
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 26.5B. In comparison, AOTOF has a market cap of 33.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $28.68, while AOTOF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.94, whereas AOTOF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AOTOF's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is more volatile compared to AOTOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.
CAJPY vs PRWYF Comparison
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 26.5B. In comparison, PRWYF has a market cap of 31M. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $28.68, while PRWYF trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.94, whereas PRWYF's P/E ratio is -1.62. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PRWYF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is less volatile compared to PRWYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.
CAJPY vs AITX Comparison
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 26.5B. In comparison, AITX has a market cap of 18.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $28.68, while AITX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.94, whereas AITX's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AITX's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is less volatile compared to AITX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.
CAJPY vs EVRC Comparison
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 26.5B. In comparison, EVRC has a market cap of 6.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $28.68, while EVRC trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.94, whereas EVRC's P/E ratio is 6.67. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to EVRC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is less volatile compared to EVRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.
CAJPY vs CCUR Comparison
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 26.5B. In comparison, CCUR has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $28.68, while CCUR trades at $1,887.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.94, whereas CCUR's P/E ratio is -4.69. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CCUR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is less volatile compared to CCUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.
CAJPY vs FNTTF Comparison
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 26.5B. In comparison, FNTTF has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $28.68, while FNTTF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.94, whereas FNTTF's P/E ratio is -1.25. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FNTTF's ROE of +0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is more volatile compared to FNTTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.
CAJPY vs VRTK Comparison
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 26.5B. In comparison, VRTK has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $28.68, while VRTK trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.94, whereas VRTK's P/E ratio is 20.50. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VRTK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is less volatile compared to VRTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.
CAJPY vs TKSTF Comparison
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 26.5B. In comparison, TKSTF has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $28.68, while TKSTF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.94, whereas TKSTF's P/E ratio is -4.10. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TKSTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is more volatile compared to TKSTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.
CAJPY vs YRLLF Comparison
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 26.5B. In comparison, YRLLF has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $28.68, while YRLLF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.94, whereas YRLLF's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to YRLLF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is more volatile compared to YRLLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.
CAJPY vs JLMKF Comparison
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 26.5B. In comparison, JLMKF has a market cap of 919.3K. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $28.68, while JLMKF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.94, whereas JLMKF's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to JLMKF's ROE of -1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is less volatile compared to JLMKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.
CAJPY vs DDDX Comparison
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 26.5B. In comparison, DDDX has a market cap of 434.6K. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $28.68, while DDDX trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.94, whereas DDDX's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DDDX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is less volatile compared to DDDX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.
CAJPY vs ITOX Comparison
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 26.5B. In comparison, ITOX has a market cap of 392.2K. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $28.68, while ITOX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.94, whereas ITOX's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ITOX's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is less volatile compared to ITOX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.
CAJPY vs DWDZF Comparison
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 26.5B. In comparison, DWDZF has a market cap of 205K. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $28.68, while DWDZF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.94, whereas DWDZF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DWDZF's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is less volatile compared to DWDZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.
CAJPY vs HAUP Comparison
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 26.5B. In comparison, HAUP has a market cap of 123.5K. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $28.68, while HAUP trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.94, whereas HAUP's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HAUP's ROE of +92.50%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is less volatile compared to HAUP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.
CAJPY vs GOSY Comparison
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 26.5B. In comparison, GOSY has a market cap of 82.5K. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $28.68, while GOSY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.94, whereas GOSY's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GOSY's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is more volatile compared to GOSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.
CAJPY vs CRTG Comparison
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 26.5B. In comparison, CRTG has a market cap of 71.9K. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $28.68, while CRTG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.94, whereas CRTG's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CRTG's ROE of +5.53%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is more volatile compared to CRTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.
CAJPY vs RDRSF Comparison
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 26.5B. In comparison, RDRSF has a market cap of 17.7K. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $28.68, while RDRSF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.94, whereas RDRSF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RDRSF's ROE of +2.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is less volatile compared to RDRSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.
CAJPY vs MDEA Comparison
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 26.5B. In comparison, MDEA has a market cap of 13.2K. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $28.68, while MDEA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.94, whereas MDEA's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MDEA's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is less volatile compared to MDEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.
CAJPY vs SNIOF Comparison
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 26.5B. In comparison, SNIOF has a market cap of 11.3K. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $28.68, while SNIOF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.94, whereas SNIOF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SNIOF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is less volatile compared to SNIOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.
CAJPY vs NADA Comparison
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 26.5B. In comparison, NADA has a market cap of 10.4K. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $28.68, while NADA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.94, whereas NADA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NADA's ROE of -8.82%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is less volatile compared to NADA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.
CAJPY vs VMRI Comparison
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 26.5B. In comparison, VMRI has a market cap of 7K. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $28.68, while VMRI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.94, whereas VMRI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VMRI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is more volatile compared to VMRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.
CAJPY vs EUOT Comparison
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 26.5B. In comparison, EUOT has a market cap of 4.8K. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $28.68, while EUOT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.94, whereas EUOT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to EUOT's ROE of +28.93%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is less volatile compared to EUOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.
CAJPY vs CBEX Comparison
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 26.5B. In comparison, CBEX has a market cap of 2.3K. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $28.68, while CBEX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.94, whereas CBEX's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CBEX's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is more volatile compared to CBEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.
CAJPY vs VIDE Comparison
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 26.5B. In comparison, VIDE has a market cap of 1.8K. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $28.68, while VIDE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.94, whereas VIDE's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VIDE's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is less volatile compared to VIDE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.
CAJPY vs MCZAF Comparison
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 26.5B. In comparison, MCZAF has a market cap of 735. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $28.68, while MCZAF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.94, whereas MCZAF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MCZAF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is less volatile compared to MCZAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.
CAJPY vs SOSO Comparison
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 26.5B. In comparison, SOSO has a market cap of 389. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $28.68, while SOSO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.94, whereas SOSO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SOSO's ROE of -1.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is less volatile compared to SOSO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.
CAJPY vs VOIS Comparison
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 26.5B. In comparison, VOIS has a market cap of 89. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $28.68, while VOIS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.94, whereas VOIS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VOIS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is less volatile compared to VOIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.
CAJPY vs IWRS Comparison
CAJPY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAJPY stands at 26.5B. In comparison, IWRS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CAJPY is priced at $28.68, while IWRS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAJPY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.94, whereas IWRS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAJPY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to IWRS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CAJPY is less volatile compared to IWRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAJPY.