Evolution Mining Limited
Evolution Mining Limited CAHPF Peers
See (CAHPF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Gold Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAHPF | $5.20 | +0.48% | 10.3B | 22.57 | $0.23 | +1.78% |
| ZIJMF | $2.66 | +1.53% | 75.4B | 14.21 | $0.19 | +1.96% |
| OPYGY | $21.00 | +0.00% | 28.4B | 2.50 | $8.39 | +853.77% |
| GFIOF | $24.03 | +0.00% | 21.5B | 17.41 | $1.38 | +2.27% |
| NESRF | $12.49 | +0.00% | 17.6B | 23.21 | $0.53 | +2.65% |
| NSTYY | $12.40 | +0.00% | 14.3B | 33.51 | $0.37 | +1.44% |
| NCMGY | $15.59 | +2.84% | 13.9B | 17.92 | $0.87 | N/A |
| NCMGF | $15.20 | -2.53% | 13.6B | 17.47 | $0.87 | N/A |
| LUGDF | $52.41 | -0.58% | 12.6B | 23.53 | $2.22 | +2.99% |
| OCANF | $14.09 | -1.54% | 10.1B | 35.41 | $0.41 | +0.21% |
Stock Comparison
CAHPF vs ZIJMF Comparison
CAHPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAHPF stands at 10.3B. In comparison, ZIJMF has a market cap of 75.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CAHPF is priced at $5.20, while ZIJMF trades at $2.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAHPF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas ZIJMF's P/E ratio is 14.21. In terms of profitability, CAHPF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ZIJMF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CAHPF is less volatile compared to ZIJMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAHPF.
CAHPF vs OPYGY Comparison
CAHPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAHPF stands at 10.3B. In comparison, OPYGY has a market cap of 28.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CAHPF is priced at $5.20, while OPYGY trades at $21.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAHPF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas OPYGY's P/E ratio is 2.50. In terms of profitability, CAHPF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OPYGY's ROE of +3.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CAHPF and OPYGY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CAHPF vs GFIOF Comparison
CAHPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAHPF stands at 10.3B. In comparison, GFIOF has a market cap of 21.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CAHPF is priced at $5.20, while GFIOF trades at $24.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAHPF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas GFIOF's P/E ratio is 17.41. In terms of profitability, CAHPF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GFIOF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CAHPF and GFIOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CAHPF vs NESRF Comparison
CAHPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAHPF stands at 10.3B. In comparison, NESRF has a market cap of 17.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CAHPF is priced at $5.20, while NESRF trades at $12.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAHPF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas NESRF's P/E ratio is 23.21. In terms of profitability, CAHPF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NESRF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CAHPF is less volatile compared to NESRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAHPF.
CAHPF vs NSTYY Comparison
CAHPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAHPF stands at 10.3B. In comparison, NSTYY has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CAHPF is priced at $5.20, while NSTYY trades at $12.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAHPF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas NSTYY's P/E ratio is 33.51. In terms of profitability, CAHPF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NSTYY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CAHPF and NSTYY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CAHPF vs NCMGY Comparison
CAHPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAHPF stands at 10.3B. In comparison, NCMGY has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CAHPF is priced at $5.20, while NCMGY trades at $15.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAHPF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas NCMGY's P/E ratio is 17.92. In terms of profitability, CAHPF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NCMGY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CAHPF is less volatile compared to NCMGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAHPF.
CAHPF vs NCMGF Comparison
CAHPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAHPF stands at 10.3B. In comparison, NCMGF has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CAHPF is priced at $5.20, while NCMGF trades at $15.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAHPF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas NCMGF's P/E ratio is 17.47. In terms of profitability, CAHPF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NCMGF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CAHPF is less volatile compared to NCMGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAHPF.
CAHPF vs LUGDF Comparison
CAHPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAHPF stands at 10.3B. In comparison, LUGDF has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CAHPF is priced at $5.20, while LUGDF trades at $52.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAHPF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas LUGDF's P/E ratio is 23.53. In terms of profitability, CAHPF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LUGDF's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, CAHPF is less volatile compared to LUGDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAHPF.
CAHPF vs OCANF Comparison
CAHPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAHPF stands at 10.3B. In comparison, OCANF has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CAHPF is priced at $5.20, while OCANF trades at $14.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAHPF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas OCANF's P/E ratio is 35.41. In terms of profitability, CAHPF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OCANF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CAHPF is less volatile compared to OCANF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAHPF.
CAHPF vs HGMCF Comparison
CAHPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAHPF stands at 10.3B. In comparison, HGMCF has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CAHPF is priced at $5.20, while HGMCF trades at $14.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAHPF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas HGMCF's P/E ratio is 16.34. In terms of profitability, CAHPF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HGMCF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CAHPF and HGMCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CAHPF vs EDVMF Comparison
CAHPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAHPF stands at 10.3B. In comparison, EDVMF has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CAHPF is priced at $5.20, while EDVMF trades at $30.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAHPF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas EDVMF's P/E ratio is -75.38. In terms of profitability, CAHPF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EDVMF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CAHPF is less volatile compared to EDVMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAHPF.
CAHPF vs AULGF Comparison
CAHPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAHPF stands at 10.3B. In comparison, AULGF has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CAHPF is priced at $5.20, while AULGF trades at $15.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAHPF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas AULGF's P/E ratio is 159.00. In terms of profitability, CAHPF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AULGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CAHPF and AULGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CAHPF vs ZHAOF Comparison
CAHPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAHPF stands at 10.3B. In comparison, ZHAOF has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CAHPF is priced at $5.20, while ZHAOF trades at $2.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAHPF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas ZHAOF's P/E ratio is 35.00. In terms of profitability, CAHPF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ZHAOF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CAHPF and ZHAOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CAHPF vs SBYSF Comparison
CAHPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAHPF stands at 10.3B. In comparison, SBYSF has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, CAHPF is priced at $5.20, while SBYSF trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAHPF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas SBYSF's P/E ratio is -12.50. In terms of profitability, CAHPF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SBYSF's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CAHPF and SBYSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CAHPF vs ARGTF Comparison
CAHPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAHPF stands at 10.3B. In comparison, ARGTF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CAHPF is priced at $5.20, while ARGTF trades at $18.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAHPF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas ARGTF's P/E ratio is -264.93. In terms of profitability, CAHPF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ARGTF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CAHPF is less volatile compared to ARGTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAHPF.
CAHPF vs COGDF Comparison
CAHPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAHPF stands at 10.3B. In comparison, COGDF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CAHPF is priced at $5.20, while COGDF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAHPF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas COGDF's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, CAHPF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to COGDF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CAHPF and COGDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CAHPF vs DGMLF Comparison
CAHPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAHPF stands at 10.3B. In comparison, DGMLF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CAHPF is priced at $5.20, while DGMLF trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAHPF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas DGMLF's P/E ratio is -154.50. In terms of profitability, CAHPF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DGMLF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CAHPF is less volatile compared to DGMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAHPF.
CAHPF vs ZIJMY Comparison
CAHPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAHPF stands at 10.3B. In comparison, ZIJMY has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CAHPF is priced at $5.20, while ZIJMY trades at $52.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAHPF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas ZIJMY's P/E ratio is 13.90. In terms of profitability, CAHPF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ZIJMY's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CAHPF is less volatile compared to ZIJMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAHPF.
CAHPF vs GSISF Comparison
CAHPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAHPF stands at 10.3B. In comparison, GSISF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CAHPF is priced at $5.20, while GSISF trades at $2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAHPF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas GSISF's P/E ratio is 41.00. In terms of profitability, CAHPF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GSISF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CAHPF and GSISF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CAHPF vs PMNXF Comparison
CAHPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAHPF stands at 10.3B. In comparison, PMNXF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CAHPF is priced at $5.20, while PMNXF trades at $2.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAHPF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas PMNXF's P/E ratio is 8.85. In terms of profitability, CAHPF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PMNXF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CAHPF is less volatile compared to PMNXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAHPF.
CAHPF vs GRLGF Comparison
CAHPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAHPF stands at 10.3B. In comparison, GRLGF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, CAHPF is priced at $5.20, while GRLGF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAHPF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas GRLGF's P/E ratio is -22.50. In terms of profitability, CAHPF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GRLGF's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, CAHPF is less volatile compared to GRLGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAHPF.
CAHPF vs CRNLF Comparison
CAHPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAHPF stands at 10.3B. In comparison, CRNLF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CAHPF is priced at $5.20, while CRNLF trades at $6.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAHPF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas CRNLF's P/E ratio is 50.77. In terms of profitability, CAHPF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CRNLF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CAHPF and CRNLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CAHPF vs TORXF Comparison
CAHPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAHPF stands at 10.3B. In comparison, TORXF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CAHPF is priced at $5.20, while TORXF trades at $32.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAHPF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas TORXF's P/E ratio is 21.71. In terms of profitability, CAHPF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TORXF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CAHPF is less volatile compared to TORXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAHPF.
CAHPF vs DPMLF Comparison
CAHPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAHPF stands at 10.3B. In comparison, DPMLF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CAHPF is priced at $5.20, while DPMLF trades at $15.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAHPF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas DPMLF's P/E ratio is 12.31. In terms of profitability, CAHPF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DPMLF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CAHPF is less volatile compared to DPMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAHPF.
CAHPF vs KNTNF Comparison
CAHPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAHPF stands at 10.3B. In comparison, KNTNF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CAHPF is priced at $5.20, while KNTNF trades at $11.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAHPF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas KNTNF's P/E ratio is 15.15. In terms of profitability, CAHPF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KNTNF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CAHPF is less volatile compared to KNTNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAHPF.
CAHPF vs RGRNF Comparison
CAHPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAHPF stands at 10.3B. In comparison, RGRNF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CAHPF is priced at $5.20, while RGRNF trades at $3.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAHPF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas RGRNF's P/E ratio is -310.00. In terms of profitability, CAHPF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RGRNF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CAHPF and RGRNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CAHPF vs CELTF Comparison
CAHPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAHPF stands at 10.3B. In comparison, CELTF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CAHPF is priced at $5.20, while CELTF trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAHPF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas CELTF's P/E ratio is 26.86. In terms of profitability, CAHPF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CELTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CAHPF and CELTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CAHPF vs ELKMF Comparison
CAHPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAHPF stands at 10.3B. In comparison, ELKMF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CAHPF is priced at $5.20, while ELKMF trades at $1.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAHPF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas ELKMF's P/E ratio is 22.26. In terms of profitability, CAHPF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ELKMF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CAHPF is less volatile compared to ELKMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAHPF.
CAHPF vs WDOFF Comparison
CAHPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAHPF stands at 10.3B. In comparison, WDOFF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CAHPF is priced at $5.20, while WDOFF trades at $13.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAHPF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas WDOFF's P/E ratio is 15.52. In terms of profitability, CAHPF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WDOFF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CAHPF is less volatile compared to WDOFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAHPF.
CAHPF vs RMLRF Comparison
CAHPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAHPF stands at 10.3B. In comparison, RMLRF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CAHPF is priced at $5.20, while RMLRF trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAHPF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas RMLRF's P/E ratio is 8.68. In terms of profitability, CAHPF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RMLRF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CAHPF and RMLRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CAHPF vs REDLF Comparison
CAHPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAHPF stands at 10.3B. In comparison, REDLF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CAHPF is priced at $5.20, while REDLF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAHPF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas REDLF's P/E ratio is 27.94. In terms of profitability, CAHPF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to REDLF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CAHPF is less volatile compared to REDLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAHPF.
CAHPF vs EOGSF Comparison
CAHPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAHPF stands at 10.3B. In comparison, EOGSF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CAHPF is priced at $5.20, while EOGSF trades at $2.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAHPF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas EOGSF's P/E ratio is 28.90. In terms of profitability, CAHPF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EOGSF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CAHPF is less volatile compared to EOGSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAHPF.
CAHPF vs ORAAF Comparison
CAHPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAHPF stands at 10.3B. In comparison, ORAAF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CAHPF is priced at $5.20, while ORAAF trades at $25.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAHPF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas ORAAF's P/E ratio is -19.38. In terms of profitability, CAHPF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ORAAF's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, CAHPF is less volatile compared to ORAAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAHPF.
CAHPF vs CXBMF Comparison
CAHPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAHPF stands at 10.3B. In comparison, CXBMF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CAHPF is priced at $5.20, while CXBMF trades at $2.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAHPF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas CXBMF's P/E ratio is 31.00. In terms of profitability, CAHPF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CXBMF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CAHPF is less volatile compared to CXBMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAHPF.
CAHPF vs HCHDF Comparison
CAHPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAHPF stands at 10.3B. In comparison, HCHDF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CAHPF is priced at $5.20, while HCHDF trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAHPF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas HCHDF's P/E ratio is 18.97. In terms of profitability, CAHPF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HCHDF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CAHPF is less volatile compared to HCHDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAHPF.
CAHPF vs WFRSF Comparison
CAHPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAHPF stands at 10.3B. In comparison, WFRSF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CAHPF is priced at $5.20, while WFRSF trades at $1.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAHPF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas WFRSF's P/E ratio is 12.23. In terms of profitability, CAHPF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WFRSF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CAHPF and WFRSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CAHPF vs PAFRF Comparison
CAHPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAHPF stands at 10.3B. In comparison, PAFRF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CAHPF is priced at $5.20, while PAFRF trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAHPF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas PAFRF's P/E ratio is 15.95. In terms of profitability, CAHPF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PAFRF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CAHPF and PAFRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CAHPF vs OBNNF Comparison
CAHPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAHPF stands at 10.3B. In comparison, OBNNF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CAHPF is priced at $5.20, while OBNNF trades at $3.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAHPF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas OBNNF's P/E ratio is -351.00. In terms of profitability, CAHPF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OBNNF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CAHPF is less volatile compared to OBNNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAHPF.
CAHPF vs MWSNF Comparison
CAHPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAHPF stands at 10.3B. In comparison, MWSNF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CAHPF is priced at $5.20, while MWSNF trades at $4.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAHPF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas MWSNF's P/E ratio is -98.00. In terms of profitability, CAHPF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MWSNF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CAHPF is less volatile compared to MWSNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAHPF.
CAHPF vs MAUTF Comparison
CAHPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAHPF stands at 10.3B. In comparison, MAUTF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CAHPF is priced at $5.20, while MAUTF trades at $3.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAHPF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas MAUTF's P/E ratio is -15.18. In terms of profitability, CAHPF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MAUTF's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, CAHPF is less volatile compared to MAUTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAHPF.
CAHPF vs KOZAY Comparison
CAHPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAHPF stands at 10.3B. In comparison, KOZAY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CAHPF is priced at $5.20, while KOZAY trades at $6.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAHPF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas KOZAY's P/E ratio is 6.96. In terms of profitability, CAHPF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KOZAY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CAHPF and KOZAY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CAHPF vs AURQF Comparison
CAHPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAHPF stands at 10.3B. In comparison, AURQF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CAHPF is priced at $5.20, while AURQF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAHPF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas AURQF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CAHPF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AURQF's ROE of -2.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CAHPF and AURQF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CAHPF vs SNWGF Comparison
CAHPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAHPF stands at 10.3B. In comparison, SNWGF has a market cap of 997.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CAHPF is priced at $5.20, while SNWGF trades at $6.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAHPF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas SNWGF's P/E ratio is -44.29. In terms of profitability, CAHPF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SNWGF's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, CAHPF is less volatile compared to SNWGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAHPF.
CAHPF vs DRDGF Comparison
CAHPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAHPF stands at 10.3B. In comparison, DRDGF has a market cap of 983.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CAHPF is priced at $5.20, while DRDGF trades at $1.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAHPF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas DRDGF's P/E ratio is 10.36. In terms of profitability, CAHPF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DRDGF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CAHPF and DRDGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CAHPF vs RMGGF Comparison
CAHPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAHPF stands at 10.3B. In comparison, RMGGF has a market cap of 963.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CAHPF is priced at $5.20, while RMGGF trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAHPF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas RMGGF's P/E ratio is -45.25. In terms of profitability, CAHPF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RMGGF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CAHPF and RMGGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CAHPF vs HCHDY Comparison
CAHPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAHPF stands at 10.3B. In comparison, HCHDY has a market cap of 930.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CAHPF is priced at $5.20, while HCHDY trades at $27.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAHPF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas HCHDY's P/E ratio is 12.92. In terms of profitability, CAHPF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HCHDY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CAHPF and HCHDY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CAHPF vs SVLKF Comparison
CAHPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAHPF stands at 10.3B. In comparison, SVLKF has a market cap of 927.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CAHPF is priced at $5.20, while SVLKF trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAHPF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas SVLKF's P/E ratio is 13.86. In terms of profitability, CAHPF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SVLKF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CAHPF and SVLKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CAHPF vs BELGF Comparison
CAHPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAHPF stands at 10.3B. In comparison, BELGF has a market cap of 922.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CAHPF is priced at $5.20, while BELGF trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAHPF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas BELGF's P/E ratio is 12.50. In terms of profitability, CAHPF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BELGF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CAHPF is less volatile compared to BELGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAHPF.
CAHPF vs SGSVF Comparison
CAHPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAHPF stands at 10.3B. In comparison, SGSVF has a market cap of 880.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CAHPF is priced at $5.20, while SGSVF trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAHPF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas SGSVF's P/E ratio is -79.00. In terms of profitability, CAHPF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SGSVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CAHPF is less volatile compared to SGSVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAHPF.
CAHPF vs KRRGF Comparison
CAHPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAHPF stands at 10.3B. In comparison, KRRGF has a market cap of 862.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CAHPF is priced at $5.20, while KRRGF trades at $4.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAHPF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas KRRGF's P/E ratio is 80.50. In terms of profitability, CAHPF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KRRGF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAHPF is less volatile compared to KRRGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAHPF.
CAHPF vs RUPRF Comparison
CAHPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAHPF stands at 10.3B. In comparison, RUPRF has a market cap of 800.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CAHPF is priced at $5.20, while RUPRF trades at $3.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAHPF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas RUPRF's P/E ratio is -171.05. In terms of profitability, CAHPF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RUPRF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CAHPF is less volatile compared to RUPRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAHPF.
CAHPF vs WTGRF Comparison
CAHPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAHPF stands at 10.3B. In comparison, WTGRF has a market cap of 677.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CAHPF is priced at $5.20, while WTGRF trades at $1.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAHPF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas WTGRF's P/E ratio is 143.00. In terms of profitability, CAHPF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WTGRF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CAHPF is less volatile compared to WTGRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAHPF.
CAHPF vs RGDFF Comparison
CAHPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAHPF stands at 10.3B. In comparison, RGDFF has a market cap of 676.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CAHPF is priced at $5.20, while RGDFF trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAHPF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas RGDFF's P/E ratio is -13.61. In terms of profitability, CAHPF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RGDFF's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, CAHPF is less volatile compared to RGDFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAHPF.
CAHPF vs PDIYF Comparison
CAHPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAHPF stands at 10.3B. In comparison, PDIYF has a market cap of 655.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CAHPF is priced at $5.20, while PDIYF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAHPF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas PDIYF's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, CAHPF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PDIYF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CAHPF and PDIYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CAHPF vs MNSAF Comparison
CAHPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAHPF stands at 10.3B. In comparison, MNSAF has a market cap of 584.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CAHPF is priced at $5.20, while MNSAF trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAHPF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas MNSAF's P/E ratio is 5.42. In terms of profitability, CAHPF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MNSAF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CAHPF is less volatile compared to MNSAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAHPF.
CAHPF vs ASGOF Comparison
CAHPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAHPF stands at 10.3B. In comparison, ASGOF has a market cap of 566.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CAHPF is priced at $5.20, while ASGOF trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAHPF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas ASGOF's P/E ratio is -8.07. In terms of profitability, CAHPF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ASGOF's ROE of -22.71%. Regarding short-term risk, CAHPF is less volatile compared to ASGOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAHPF.
CAHPF vs ECRTF Comparison
CAHPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAHPF stands at 10.3B. In comparison, ECRTF has a market cap of 523.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CAHPF is priced at $5.20, while ECRTF trades at $1.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAHPF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas ECRTF's P/E ratio is -11.69. In terms of profitability, CAHPF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ECRTF's ROE of -6.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CAHPF and ECRTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CAHPF vs RMGGY Comparison
CAHPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAHPF stands at 10.3B. In comparison, RMGGY has a market cap of 517.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CAHPF is priced at $5.20, while RMGGY trades at $2.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAHPF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas RMGGY's P/E ratio is -18.69. In terms of profitability, CAHPF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RMGGY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CAHPF and RMGGY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CAHPF vs NVMLF Comparison
CAHPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAHPF stands at 10.3B. In comparison, NVMLF has a market cap of 512.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CAHPF is priced at $5.20, while NVMLF trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAHPF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas NVMLF's P/E ratio is -0.98. In terms of profitability, CAHPF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NVMLF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CAHPF is less volatile compared to NVMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAHPF.
CAHPF vs GUYGF Comparison
CAHPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAHPF stands at 10.3B. In comparison, GUYGF has a market cap of 511.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CAHPF is priced at $5.20, while GUYGF trades at $2.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAHPF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas GUYGF's P/E ratio is -70.67. In terms of profitability, CAHPF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GUYGF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CAHPF is less volatile compared to GUYGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAHPF.
CAHPF vs RIOFF Comparison
CAHPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAHPF stands at 10.3B. In comparison, RIOFF has a market cap of 484.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CAHPF is priced at $5.20, while RIOFF trades at $1.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAHPF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas RIOFF's P/E ratio is 114.00. In terms of profitability, CAHPF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RIOFF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAHPF is less volatile compared to RIOFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAHPF.
CAHPF vs OSKA Comparison
CAHPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAHPF stands at 10.3B. In comparison, OSKA has a market cap of 483.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CAHPF is priced at $5.20, while OSKA trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAHPF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas OSKA's P/E ratio is -16.67. In terms of profitability, CAHPF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OSKA's ROE of -36.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CAHPF is less volatile compared to OSKA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAHPF.
CAHPF vs PNGZF Comparison
CAHPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAHPF stands at 10.3B. In comparison, PNGZF has a market cap of 473.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CAHPF is priced at $5.20, while PNGZF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAHPF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas PNGZF's P/E ratio is -33.00. In terms of profitability, CAHPF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PNGZF's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, CAHPF and PNGZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CAHPF vs ORZCF Comparison
CAHPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAHPF stands at 10.3B. In comparison, ORZCF has a market cap of 472.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CAHPF is priced at $5.20, while ORZCF trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAHPF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas ORZCF's P/E ratio is 6.85. In terms of profitability, CAHPF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ORZCF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CAHPF is less volatile compared to ORZCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAHPF.
CAHPF vs ARNGF Comparison
CAHPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAHPF stands at 10.3B. In comparison, ARNGF has a market cap of 468.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CAHPF is priced at $5.20, while ARNGF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAHPF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas ARNGF's P/E ratio is -1.42. In terms of profitability, CAHPF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ARNGF's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, CAHPF is less volatile compared to ARNGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAHPF.
CAHPF vs RMLFF Comparison
CAHPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAHPF stands at 10.3B. In comparison, RMLFF has a market cap of 464M. Regarding current trading prices, CAHPF is priced at $5.20, while RMLFF trades at $0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAHPF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas RMLFF's P/E ratio is -9.41. In terms of profitability, CAHPF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RMLFF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CAHPF is less volatile compared to RMLFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAHPF.
CAHPF vs RSRBF Comparison
CAHPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAHPF stands at 10.3B. In comparison, RSRBF has a market cap of 463M. Regarding current trading prices, CAHPF is priced at $5.20, while RSRBF trades at $2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAHPF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas RSRBF's P/E ratio is 79.98. In terms of profitability, CAHPF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RSRBF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CAHPF and RSRBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CAHPF vs LMGDF Comparison
CAHPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAHPF stands at 10.3B. In comparison, LMGDF has a market cap of 384.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CAHPF is priced at $5.20, while LMGDF trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAHPF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas LMGDF's P/E ratio is -7.07. In terms of profitability, CAHPF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LMGDF's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CAHPF is less volatile compared to LMGDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAHPF.
CAHPF vs THXPF Comparison
CAHPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAHPF stands at 10.3B. In comparison, THXPF has a market cap of 365.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CAHPF is priced at $5.20, while THXPF trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAHPF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas THXPF's P/E ratio is 3.24. In terms of profitability, CAHPF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to THXPF's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, CAHPF and THXPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CAHPF vs ELEMF Comparison
CAHPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAHPF stands at 10.3B. In comparison, ELEMF has a market cap of 346.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CAHPF is priced at $5.20, while ELEMF trades at $1.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAHPF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas ELEMF's P/E ratio is 70.50. In terms of profitability, CAHPF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ELEMF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAHPF is less volatile compared to ELEMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAHPF.
CAHPF vs TPRXF Comparison
CAHPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAHPF stands at 10.3B. In comparison, TPRXF has a market cap of 343.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CAHPF is priced at $5.20, while TPRXF trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAHPF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas TPRXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAHPF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TPRXF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CAHPF is less volatile compared to TPRXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAHPF.
CAHPF vs PROBF Comparison
CAHPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAHPF stands at 10.3B. In comparison, PROBF has a market cap of 340.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CAHPF is priced at $5.20, while PROBF trades at $1.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAHPF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas PROBF's P/E ratio is -13.92. In terms of profitability, CAHPF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PROBF's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CAHPF is less volatile compared to PROBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAHPF.
CAHPF vs MNDJF Comparison
CAHPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAHPF stands at 10.3B. In comparison, MNDJF has a market cap of 330.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CAHPF is priced at $5.20, while MNDJF trades at $3.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAHPF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas MNDJF's P/E ratio is 5.91. In terms of profitability, CAHPF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MNDJF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CAHPF is less volatile compared to MNDJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAHPF.
CAHPF vs MAKOF Comparison
CAHPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAHPF stands at 10.3B. In comparison, MAKOF has a market cap of 300.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CAHPF is priced at $5.20, while MAKOF trades at $3.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAHPF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas MAKOF's P/E ratio is 12.53. In terms of profitability, CAHPF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MAKOF's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CAHPF is less volatile compared to MAKOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAHPF.
CAHPF vs FDMIF Comparison
CAHPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAHPF stands at 10.3B. In comparison, FDMIF has a market cap of 286.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CAHPF is priced at $5.20, while FDMIF trades at $2.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAHPF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas FDMIF's P/E ratio is -30.10. In terms of profitability, CAHPF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FDMIF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CAHPF is less volatile compared to FDMIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAHPF.
CAHPF vs TGMGF Comparison
CAHPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAHPF stands at 10.3B. In comparison, TGMGF has a market cap of 283M. Regarding current trading prices, CAHPF is priced at $5.20, while TGMGF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAHPF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas TGMGF's P/E ratio is -3.85. In terms of profitability, CAHPF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TGMGF's ROE of -7.46%. Regarding short-term risk, CAHPF and TGMGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CAHPF vs OGNRF Comparison
CAHPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAHPF stands at 10.3B. In comparison, OGNRF has a market cap of 282.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CAHPF is priced at $5.20, while OGNRF trades at $1.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAHPF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas OGNRF's P/E ratio is 140.00. In terms of profitability, CAHPF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OGNRF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CAHPF is less volatile compared to OGNRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAHPF.
CAHPF vs OMGGF Comparison
CAHPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAHPF stands at 10.3B. In comparison, OMGGF has a market cap of 282.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CAHPF is priced at $5.20, while OMGGF trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAHPF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas OMGGF's P/E ratio is -23.00. In terms of profitability, CAHPF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OMGGF's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CAHPF is less volatile compared to OMGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAHPF.
CAHPF vs MGDPF Comparison
CAHPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAHPF stands at 10.3B. In comparison, MGDPF has a market cap of 278.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CAHPF is priced at $5.20, while MGDPF trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAHPF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas MGDPF's P/E ratio is -19.80. In terms of profitability, CAHPF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MGDPF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CAHPF is less volatile compared to MGDPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAHPF.
CAHPF vs ALKEF Comparison
CAHPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAHPF stands at 10.3B. In comparison, ALKEF has a market cap of 278.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CAHPF is priced at $5.20, while ALKEF trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAHPF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas ALKEF's P/E ratio is 23.00. In terms of profitability, CAHPF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ALKEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CAHPF and ALKEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CAHPF vs KSKGF Comparison
CAHPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAHPF stands at 10.3B. In comparison, KSKGF has a market cap of 260.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CAHPF is priced at $5.20, while KSKGF trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAHPF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas KSKGF's P/E ratio is 1.87. In terms of profitability, CAHPF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KSKGF's ROE of +1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, CAHPF and KSKGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CAHPF vs OSIIF Comparison
CAHPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAHPF stands at 10.3B. In comparison, OSIIF has a market cap of 254.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CAHPF is priced at $5.20, while OSIIF trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAHPF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas OSIIF's P/E ratio is -5.83. In terms of profitability, CAHPF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OSIIF's ROE of +4.74%. Regarding short-term risk, CAHPF and OSIIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CAHPF vs ERRSF Comparison
CAHPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAHPF stands at 10.3B. In comparison, ERRSF has a market cap of 250.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CAHPF is priced at $5.20, while ERRSF trades at $3.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAHPF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas ERRSF's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, CAHPF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ERRSF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CAHPF is less volatile compared to ERRSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAHPF.
CAHPF vs STPGF Comparison
CAHPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAHPF stands at 10.3B. In comparison, STPGF has a market cap of 233.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CAHPF is priced at $5.20, while STPGF trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAHPF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas STPGF's P/E ratio is 4.87. In terms of profitability, CAHPF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to STPGF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CAHPF is less volatile compared to STPGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAHPF.
CAHPF vs STBMF Comparison
CAHPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAHPF stands at 10.3B. In comparison, STBMF has a market cap of 227.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CAHPF is priced at $5.20, while STBMF trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAHPF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas STBMF's P/E ratio is -4.20. In terms of profitability, CAHPF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to STBMF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CAHPF and STBMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CAHPF vs HSTXF Comparison
CAHPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAHPF stands at 10.3B. In comparison, HSTXF has a market cap of 223.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CAHPF is priced at $5.20, while HSTXF trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAHPF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas HSTXF's P/E ratio is 3.58. In terms of profitability, CAHPF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HSTXF's ROE of +1.57%. Regarding short-term risk, CAHPF is less volatile compared to HSTXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAHPF.
CAHPF vs WRLGF Comparison
CAHPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAHPF stands at 10.3B. In comparison, WRLGF has a market cap of 216.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CAHPF is priced at $5.20, while WRLGF trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAHPF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas WRLGF's P/E ratio is -2.23. In terms of profitability, CAHPF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WRLGF's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CAHPF is less volatile compared to WRLGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAHPF.
CAHPF vs GDRZF Comparison
CAHPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAHPF stands at 10.3B. In comparison, GDRZF has a market cap of 213.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CAHPF is priced at $5.20, while GDRZF trades at $2.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAHPF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas GDRZF's P/E ratio is -18.90. In terms of profitability, CAHPF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GDRZF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CAHPF is less volatile compared to GDRZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAHPF.
CAHPF vs JAGGF Comparison
CAHPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAHPF stands at 10.3B. In comparison, JAGGF has a market cap of 201.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CAHPF is priced at $5.20, while JAGGF trades at $2.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAHPF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas JAGGF's P/E ratio is -31.77. In terms of profitability, CAHPF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to JAGGF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CAHPF is less volatile compared to JAGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAHPF.
CAHPF vs AGXKF Comparison
CAHPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAHPF stands at 10.3B. In comparison, AGXKF has a market cap of 196.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CAHPF is priced at $5.20, while AGXKF trades at $1.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAHPF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas AGXKF's P/E ratio is -11.47. In terms of profitability, CAHPF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AGXKF's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CAHPF and AGXKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CAHPF vs THSGF Comparison
CAHPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAHPF stands at 10.3B. In comparison, THSGF has a market cap of 196.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CAHPF is priced at $5.20, while THSGF trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAHPF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas THSGF's P/E ratio is 41.32. In terms of profitability, CAHPF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to THSGF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CAHPF is less volatile compared to THSGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAHPF.
CAHPF vs SAAGF Comparison
CAHPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAHPF stands at 10.3B. In comparison, SAAGF has a market cap of 193.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CAHPF is priced at $5.20, while SAAGF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAHPF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas SAAGF's P/E ratio is 17.50. In terms of profitability, CAHPF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SAAGF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CAHPF and SAAGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CAHPF vs CNLMF Comparison
CAHPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAHPF stands at 10.3B. In comparison, CNLMF has a market cap of 193.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CAHPF is priced at $5.20, while CNLMF trades at $2.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAHPF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas CNLMF's P/E ratio is -8.59. In terms of profitability, CAHPF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CNLMF's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, CAHPF is less volatile compared to CNLMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAHPF.
CAHPF vs DCCNF Comparison
CAHPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAHPF stands at 10.3B. In comparison, DCCNF has a market cap of 182.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CAHPF is priced at $5.20, while DCCNF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAHPF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas DCCNF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, CAHPF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DCCNF's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, CAHPF and DCCNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CAHPF vs CNMXF Comparison
CAHPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAHPF stands at 10.3B. In comparison, CNMXF has a market cap of 179.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CAHPF is priced at $5.20, while CNMXF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAHPF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas CNMXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAHPF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CNMXF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAHPF and CNMXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CAHPF vs CNMVF Comparison
CAHPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAHPF stands at 10.3B. In comparison, CNMVF has a market cap of 176M. Regarding current trading prices, CAHPF is priced at $5.20, while CNMVF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAHPF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas CNMVF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, CAHPF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CNMVF's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, CAHPF and CNMVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CAHPF vs SRBIF Comparison
CAHPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAHPF stands at 10.3B. In comparison, SRBIF has a market cap of 174.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CAHPF is priced at $5.20, while SRBIF trades at $2.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAHPF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas SRBIF's P/E ratio is 5.25. In terms of profitability, CAHPF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SRBIF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CAHPF and SRBIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CAHPF vs LECBF Comparison
CAHPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAHPF stands at 10.3B. In comparison, LECBF has a market cap of 174.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CAHPF is priced at $5.20, while LECBF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAHPF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas LECBF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAHPF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LECBF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CAHPF and LECBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CAHPF vs GGAZF Comparison
CAHPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAHPF stands at 10.3B. In comparison, GGAZF has a market cap of 163.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CAHPF is priced at $5.20, while GGAZF trades at $0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAHPF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas GGAZF's P/E ratio is -7.53. In terms of profitability, CAHPF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GGAZF's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CAHPF is less volatile compared to GGAZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAHPF.