Cardinal Health, Inc.
Cardinal Health, Inc. (CAH) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CAH) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Medical - Distribution Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAH | $155.49 | -1.77% | 37.5B | 24.60 | $6.39 | +1.29% |
MCK | $703.13 | -0.99% | 88.9B | 27.68 | $25.71 | +0.40% |
COR | $285.10 | -1.84% | 56.3B | 33.64 | $8.63 | +0.74% |
ABC | $179.98 | -0.23% | 36.1B | 21.92 | $8.21 | N/A |
HSIC | $70.38 | -3.08% | 8.7B | 22.26 | $3.21 | N/A |
PBH | $76.42 | +0.18% | 3.8B | 17.92 | $4.29 | N/A |
PDCO | $31.33 | +0.00% | 2.8B | 20.48 | $1.53 | +0.83% |
GRDN | $20.94 | +3.25% | 1.3B | -12.93 | -$1.59 | N/A |
OMI | $7.82 | -1.51% | 603.7M | -1.66 | -$4.76 | N/A |
ZYXI | $2.54 | +0.40% | 78M | -10.75 | -$0.24 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
CAH vs MCK Comparison July 2025
CAH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAH stands at 37.5B. In comparison, MCK has a market cap of 88.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CAH is priced at $155.49, while MCK trades at $703.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAH currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas MCK's P/E ratio is 27.68. In terms of profitability, CAH's ROE is -0.50%, compared to MCK's ROE of -1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CAH is less volatile compared to MCK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAH.Check MCK's competition here
CAH vs COR Comparison July 2025
CAH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAH stands at 37.5B. In comparison, COR has a market cap of 56.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CAH is priced at $155.49, while COR trades at $285.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAH currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas COR's P/E ratio is 33.64. In terms of profitability, CAH's ROE is -0.50%, compared to COR's ROE of +2.41%. Regarding short-term risk, CAH is less volatile compared to COR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAH.Check COR's competition here
CAH vs ABC Comparison July 2025
CAH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAH stands at 37.5B. In comparison, ABC has a market cap of 36.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CAH is priced at $155.49, while ABC trades at $179.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAH currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas ABC's P/E ratio is 21.92. In terms of profitability, CAH's ROE is -0.50%, compared to ABC's ROE of +2.52%. Regarding short-term risk, CAH is more volatile compared to ABC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAH.Check ABC's competition here
CAH vs HSIC Comparison July 2025
CAH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAH stands at 37.5B. In comparison, HSIC has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CAH is priced at $155.49, while HSIC trades at $70.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAH currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas HSIC's P/E ratio is 22.26. In terms of profitability, CAH's ROE is -0.50%, compared to HSIC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CAH is less volatile compared to HSIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAH.Check HSIC's competition here
CAH vs PBH Comparison July 2025
CAH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAH stands at 37.5B. In comparison, PBH has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CAH is priced at $155.49, while PBH trades at $76.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAH currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas PBH's P/E ratio is 17.92. In terms of profitability, CAH's ROE is -0.50%, compared to PBH's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CAH is more volatile compared to PBH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAH.Check PBH's competition here
CAH vs PDCO Comparison July 2025
CAH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAH stands at 37.5B. In comparison, PDCO has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CAH is priced at $155.49, while PDCO trades at $31.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAH currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas PDCO's P/E ratio is 20.48. In terms of profitability, CAH's ROE is -0.50%, compared to PDCO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CAH is more volatile compared to PDCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAH.Check PDCO's competition here
CAH vs GRDN Comparison July 2025
CAH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAH stands at 37.5B. In comparison, GRDN has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CAH is priced at $155.49, while GRDN trades at $20.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAH currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas GRDN's P/E ratio is -12.93. In terms of profitability, CAH's ROE is -0.50%, compared to GRDN's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, CAH is less volatile compared to GRDN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAH.Check GRDN's competition here
CAH vs OMI Comparison July 2025
CAH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAH stands at 37.5B. In comparison, OMI has a market cap of 603.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CAH is priced at $155.49, while OMI trades at $7.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAH currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas OMI's P/E ratio is -1.66. In terms of profitability, CAH's ROE is -0.50%, compared to OMI's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, CAH is less volatile compared to OMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAH.Check OMI's competition here
CAH vs ZYXI Comparison July 2025
CAH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAH stands at 37.5B. In comparison, ZYXI has a market cap of 78M. Regarding current trading prices, CAH is priced at $155.49, while ZYXI trades at $2.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAH currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas ZYXI's P/E ratio is -10.75. In terms of profitability, CAH's ROE is -0.50%, compared to ZYXI's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CAH is less volatile compared to ZYXI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAH.Check ZYXI's competition here
CAH vs WGRX Comparison July 2025
CAH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAH stands at 37.5B. In comparison, WGRX has a market cap of 67.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CAH is priced at $155.49, while WGRX trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAH currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas WGRX's P/E ratio is -1.22. In terms of profitability, CAH's ROE is -0.50%, compared to WGRX's ROE of -7.42%. Regarding short-term risk, CAH is less volatile compared to WGRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAH.Check WGRX's competition here
CAH vs GEG Comparison July 2025
CAH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAH stands at 37.5B. In comparison, GEG has a market cap of 60.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CAH is priced at $155.49, while GEG trades at $2.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAH currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas GEG's P/E ratio is -43.40. In terms of profitability, CAH's ROE is -0.50%, compared to GEG's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CAH is less volatile compared to GEG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAH.Check GEG's competition here
CAH vs HX Comparison July 2025
CAH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAH stands at 37.5B. In comparison, HX has a market cap of 53.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CAH is priced at $155.49, while HX trades at $2.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAH currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas HX's P/E ratio is -1.84. In terms of profitability, CAH's ROE is -0.50%, compared to HX's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CAH is less volatile compared to HX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAH.Check HX's competition here
CAH vs RDGT Comparison July 2025
CAH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAH stands at 37.5B. In comparison, RDGT has a market cap of 7.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CAH is priced at $155.49, while RDGT trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAH currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas RDGT's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, CAH's ROE is -0.50%, compared to RDGT's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CAH is less volatile compared to RDGT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAH.Check RDGT's competition here
CAH vs CVET Comparison July 2025
CAH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAH stands at 37.5B. In comparison, CVET has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CAH is priced at $155.49, while CVET trades at $20.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAH currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas CVET's P/E ratio is -69.97. In terms of profitability, CAH's ROE is -0.50%, compared to CVET's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CAH is more volatile compared to CVET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAH.Check CVET's competition here