California Grapes International, Inc.
California Grapes International, Inc. CAGR Peers
See (CAGR) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto-Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAGR | $0.00 | N/A | 9438.00 | -0.01 | -$0.00 | N/A |
| FYGGY | $1.50 | N/A | 48.07B | 13.64 | $0.11 | +1.00% |
| DNZOY | $13.26 | +0.06% | 37.35B | 13.39 | $0.99 | +0.94% |
| DNZOF | $12.31 | -10.64% | 34.68B | 12.56 | $0.98 | +3.53% |
| BRDCF | $42.50 | N/A | 28.81B | 15.68 | $2.71 | +3.10% |
| BRDCY | $21.03 | -0.68% | 28.50B | 15.35 | $1.37 | +2.10% |
| MGDDY | $19.57 | +0.98% | 27.62B | 8.76 | $2.23 | +3.71% |
| MGDDF | $38.66 | N/A | 27.28B | 3.46 | $11.17 | +3.79% |
| CTTAF | $85.64 | +0.99% | 17.13B | 13.11 | $6.53 | +2.86% |
| CTTAY | $8.47 | +1.93% | 16.94B | 13.03 | $0.65 | +2.63% |
Stock Comparison
CAGR vs FYGGY Comparison
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9438.00. In comparison, FYGGY has a market cap of 48.07B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while FYGGY trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas FYGGY's P/E ratio is 13.64. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to FYGGY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR is more volatile compared to FYGGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGR.
CAGR vs DNZOY Comparison
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9438.00. In comparison, DNZOY has a market cap of 37.35B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while DNZOY trades at $13.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas DNZOY's P/E ratio is 13.39. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to DNZOY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR is more volatile compared to DNZOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGR.
CAGR vs DNZOF Comparison
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9438.00. In comparison, DNZOF has a market cap of 34.68B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while DNZOF trades at $12.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas DNZOF's P/E ratio is 12.56. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to DNZOF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR is more volatile compared to DNZOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGR.
CAGR vs BRDCF Comparison
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9438.00. In comparison, BRDCF has a market cap of 28.81B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while BRDCF trades at $42.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas BRDCF's P/E ratio is 15.68. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to BRDCF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR is more volatile compared to BRDCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGR.
CAGR vs BRDCY Comparison
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9438.00. In comparison, BRDCY has a market cap of 28.50B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while BRDCY trades at $21.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas BRDCY's P/E ratio is 15.35. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to BRDCY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR is more volatile compared to BRDCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGR.
CAGR vs MGDDY Comparison
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9438.00. In comparison, MGDDY has a market cap of 27.62B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while MGDDY trades at $19.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas MGDDY's P/E ratio is 8.76. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to MGDDY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR is more volatile compared to MGDDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGR.
CAGR vs MGDDF Comparison
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9438.00. In comparison, MGDDF has a market cap of 27.28B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while MGDDF trades at $38.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas MGDDF's P/E ratio is 3.46. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to MGDDF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR is more volatile compared to MGDDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGR.
CAGR vs CTTAF Comparison
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9438.00. In comparison, CTTAF has a market cap of 17.13B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while CTTAF trades at $85.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CTTAF's P/E ratio is 13.11. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to CTTAF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR is more volatile compared to CTTAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGR.
CAGR vs CTTAY Comparison
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9438.00. In comparison, CTTAY has a market cap of 16.94B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while CTTAY trades at $8.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CTTAY's P/E ratio is 13.03. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to CTTAY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR is more volatile compared to CTTAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGR.
CAGR vs KNRRY Comparison
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9438.00. In comparison, KNRRY has a market cap of 16.00B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while KNRRY trades at $24.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas KNRRY's P/E ratio is 33.54. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to KNRRY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR is more volatile compared to KNRRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGR.
CAGR vs KNBHF Comparison
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9438.00. In comparison, KNBHF has a market cap of 15.41B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while KNBHF trades at $95.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas KNBHF's P/E ratio is 32.18. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to KNBHF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR is more volatile compared to KNBHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGR.
CAGR vs SMTOY Comparison
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9438.00. In comparison, SMTOY has a market cap of 14.04B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while SMTOY trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SMTOY's P/E ratio is 10.65. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to SMTOY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR is more volatile compared to SMTOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGR.
CAGR vs PTAIY Comparison
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9438.00. In comparison, PTAIY has a market cap of 12.21B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while PTAIY trades at $6.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas PTAIY's P/E ratio is 6.03. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to PTAIY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR is more volatile compared to PTAIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGR.
CAGR vs PTAIF Comparison
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9438.00. In comparison, PTAIF has a market cap of 11.38B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while PTAIF trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas PTAIF's P/E ratio is 5.62. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to PTAIF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR is more volatile compared to PTAIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGR.
CAGR vs HLLGY Comparison
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9438.00. In comparison, HLLGY has a market cap of 10.56B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while HLLGY trades at $47.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas HLLGY's P/E ratio is 30.25. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to HLLGY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR is more volatile compared to HLLGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGR.
CAGR vs HLKHF Comparison
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9438.00. In comparison, HLKHF has a market cap of 10.28B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while HLKHF trades at $92.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas HLKHF's P/E ratio is 25.78. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to HLKHF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR is more volatile compared to HLKHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGR.
CAGR vs ASEKY Comparison
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9438.00. In comparison, ASEKY has a market cap of 9.51B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while ASEKY trades at $12.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ASEKY's P/E ratio is 13.49. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to ASEKY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR is more volatile compared to ASEKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGR.
CAGR vs ASEKF Comparison
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9438.00. In comparison, ASEKF has a market cap of 7.64B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while ASEKF trades at $10.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ASEKF's P/E ratio is 10.84. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to ASEKF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR is more volatile compared to ASEKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGR.
CAGR vs NGKSY Comparison
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9438.00. In comparison, NGKSY has a market cap of 6.83B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while NGKSY trades at $17.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas NGKSY's P/E ratio is 10.89. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to NGKSY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR is more volatile compared to NGKSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGR.
CAGR vs PLLIF Comparison
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9438.00. In comparison, PLLIF has a market cap of 6.50B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while PLLIF trades at $6.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas PLLIF's P/E ratio is 12.50. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to PLLIF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR is more volatile compared to PLLIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGR.
CAGR vs NGKSF Comparison
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9438.00. In comparison, NGKSF has a market cap of 6.00B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while NGKSF trades at $30.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas NGKSF's P/E ratio is 9.57. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to NGKSF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR is more volatile compared to NGKSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGR.
CAGR vs SFFLY Comparison
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9438.00. In comparison, SFFLY has a market cap of 4.75B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while SFFLY trades at $5.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SFFLY's P/E ratio is -4.02. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to SFFLY's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR is more volatile compared to SFFLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGR.
CAGR vs YORUF Comparison
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9438.00. In comparison, YORUF has a market cap of 4.09B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while YORUF trades at $25.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas YORUF's P/E ratio is 8.68. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to YORUF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR is more volatile compared to YORUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGR.
CAGR vs FESTF Comparison
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9438.00. In comparison, FESTF has a market cap of 3.97B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while FESTF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas FESTF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to FESTF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR is more volatile compared to FESTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGR.
CAGR vs YORUY Comparison
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9438.00. In comparison, YORUY has a market cap of 3.96B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while YORUY trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas YORUY's P/E ratio is 6.98. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to YORUY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR is more volatile compared to YORUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGR.
CAGR vs BRBOY Comparison
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9438.00. In comparison, BRBOY has a market cap of 3.88B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while BRBOY trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas BRBOY's P/E ratio is 16.51. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to BRBOY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR is more volatile compared to BRBOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGR.
CAGR vs KOTMY Comparison
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9438.00. In comparison, KOTMY has a market cap of 3.61B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while KOTMY trades at $12.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas KOTMY's P/E ratio is 12.01. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to KOTMY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR is more volatile compared to KOTMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGR.
CAGR vs SCFLF Comparison
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9438.00. In comparison, SCFLF has a market cap of 3.44B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while SCFLF trades at $4.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SCFLF's P/E ratio is 9.60. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to SCFLF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR is more volatile compared to SCFLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGR.
CAGR vs KOTMF Comparison
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9438.00. In comparison, KOTMF has a market cap of 3.39B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while KOTMF trades at $11.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas KOTMF's P/E ratio is 20.96. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to KOTMF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR is more volatile compared to KOTMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGR.
CAGR vs BRBOF Comparison
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9438.00. In comparison, BRBOF has a market cap of 3.04B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while BRBOF trades at $9.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas BRBOF's P/E ratio is 11.34. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to BRBOF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR is more volatile compared to BRBOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGR.
CAGR vs MNTHY Comparison
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9438.00. In comparison, MNTHY has a market cap of 2.97B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while MNTHY trades at $51.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas MNTHY's P/E ratio is 9.22. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to MNTHY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR is more volatile compared to MNTHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGR.
CAGR vs STAEY Comparison
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9438.00. In comparison, STAEY has a market cap of 2.86B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while STAEY trades at $9.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas STAEY's P/E ratio is 18.19. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to STAEY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR is more volatile compared to STAEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGR.
CAGR vs SMTUF Comparison
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9438.00. In comparison, SMTUF has a market cap of 2.70B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while SMTUF trades at $10.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SMTUF's P/E ratio is 29.29. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to SMTUF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR is more volatile compared to SMTUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGR.
CAGR vs LIMAF Comparison
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9438.00. In comparison, LIMAF has a market cap of 2.68B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while LIMAF trades at $44.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas LIMAF's P/E ratio is 14.81. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to LIMAF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR is more volatile compared to LIMAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGR.
CAGR vs STAEF Comparison
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9438.00. In comparison, STAEF has a market cap of 2.53B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while STAEF trades at $16.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas STAEF's P/E ratio is 14.40. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to STAEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR is more volatile compared to STAEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGR.
CAGR vs VLEEY Comparison
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9438.00. In comparison, VLEEY has a market cap of 2.52B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while VLEEY trades at $5.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas VLEEY's P/E ratio is 14.03. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to VLEEY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR is more volatile compared to VLEEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGR.
CAGR vs TDBOF Comparison
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9438.00. In comparison, TDBOF has a market cap of 2.46B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while TDBOF trades at $13.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas TDBOF's P/E ratio is 21.86. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to TDBOF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR is more volatile compared to TDBOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGR.
CAGR vs VLEEF Comparison
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9438.00. In comparison, VLEEF has a market cap of 2.44B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while VLEEF trades at $10.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas VLEEF's P/E ratio is 13.58. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to VLEEF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR is more volatile compared to VLEEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGR.
CAGR vs NHKGF Comparison
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9438.00. In comparison, NHKGF has a market cap of 2.42B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while NHKGF trades at $11.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas NHKGF's P/E ratio is 7.80. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to NHKGF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR is more volatile compared to NHKGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGR.
CAGR vs VTSCF Comparison
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9438.00. In comparison, VTSCF has a market cap of 2.32B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while VTSCF trades at $56.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas VTSCF's P/E ratio is 82.35. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to VTSCF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR is more volatile compared to VTSCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGR.
CAGR vs MNTHF Comparison
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9438.00. In comparison, MNTHF has a market cap of 2.27B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while MNTHF trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas MNTHF's P/E ratio is 7.14. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to MNTHF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR is more volatile compared to MNTHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGR.
CAGR vs NPSKY Comparison
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9438.00. In comparison, NPSKY has a market cap of 2.24B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while NPSKY trades at $9.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas NPSKY's P/E ratio is 26.91. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to NPSKY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR is more volatile compared to NPSKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGR.
CAGR vs NPSKF Comparison
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9438.00. In comparison, NPSKF has a market cap of 2.20B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while NPSKF trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas NPSKF's P/E ratio is 32.14. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to NPSKF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR is more volatile compared to NPSKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGR.
CAGR vs TGOSY Comparison
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9438.00. In comparison, TGOSY has a market cap of 2.12B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while TGOSY trades at $33.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas TGOSY's P/E ratio is 8.34. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to TGOSY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR is more volatile compared to TGOSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGR.
CAGR vs ARBFF Comparison
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9438.00. In comparison, ARBFF has a market cap of 2.07B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while ARBFF trades at $24.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ARBFF's P/E ratio is 31.15. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to ARBFF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR is more volatile compared to ARBFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGR.
CAGR vs JELCF Comparison
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9438.00. In comparison, JELCF has a market cap of 1.98B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while JELCF trades at $2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas JELCF's P/E ratio is 8.27. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to JELCF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR is more volatile compared to JELCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGR.
CAGR vs JEHLY Comparison
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9438.00. In comparison, JEHLY has a market cap of 1.89B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while JEHLY trades at $20.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas JEHLY's P/E ratio is 8.01. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to JEHLY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR is more volatile compared to JEHLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGR.
CAGR vs MBUMY Comparison
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9438.00. In comparison, MBUMY has a market cap of 1.85B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while MBUMY trades at $7.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas MBUMY's P/E ratio is 29.52. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to MBUMY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR is more volatile compared to MBUMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGR.
CAGR vs MBUMF Comparison
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9438.00. In comparison, MBUMF has a market cap of 1.75B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while MBUMF trades at $13.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas MBUMF's P/E ratio is 18.65. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to MBUMF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR is more volatile compared to MBUMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGR.
CAGR vs GMPUF Comparison
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9438.00. In comparison, GMPUF has a market cap of 1.68B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while GMPUF trades at $2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas GMPUF's P/E ratio is 7.97. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to GMPUF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR is more volatile compared to GMPUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGR.
CAGR vs UNIEF Comparison
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9438.00. In comparison, UNIEF has a market cap of 1.58B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while UNIEF trades at $35.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas UNIEF's P/E ratio is 24.13. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to UNIEF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR is more volatile compared to UNIEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGR.
CAGR vs NTXVF Comparison
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9438.00. In comparison, NTXVF has a market cap of 1.58B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while NTXVF trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas NTXVF's P/E ratio is 31.40. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to NTXVF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR is more volatile compared to NTXVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGR.
CAGR vs GUDDY Comparison
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9438.00. In comparison, GUDDY has a market cap of 1.55B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while GUDDY trades at $11.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas GUDDY's P/E ratio is 25.22. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to GUDDY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR is more volatile compared to GUDDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGR.
CAGR vs FURCF Comparison
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9438.00. In comparison, FURCF has a market cap of 1.48B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while FURCF trades at $7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas FURCF's P/E ratio is -7.14. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to FURCF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR is more volatile compared to FURCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGR.
CAGR vs PASTF Comparison
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9438.00. In comparison, PASTF has a market cap of 1.40B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while PASTF trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas PASTF's P/E ratio is 7.63. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to PASTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR is more volatile compared to PASTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGR.
CAGR vs NIFCY Comparison
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9438.00. In comparison, NIFCY has a market cap of 1.32B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while NIFCY trades at $13.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas NIFCY's P/E ratio is 25.94. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to NIFCY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR is more volatile compared to NIFCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGR.
CAGR vs NKRKY Comparison
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9438.00. In comparison, NKRKY has a market cap of 973.38M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while NKRKY trades at $3.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas NKRKY's P/E ratio is -25.21. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to NKRKY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR is more volatile compared to NKRKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGR.
CAGR vs NKRKF Comparison
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9438.00. In comparison, NKRKF has a market cap of 958.90M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while NKRKF trades at $6.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas NKRKF's P/E ratio is -23.98. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to NKRKF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR is more volatile compared to NKRKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGR.
CAGR vs TIANF Comparison
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9438.00. In comparison, TIANF has a market cap of 939.52M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while TIANF trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas TIANF's P/E ratio is 3.79. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to TIANF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR is more volatile compared to TIANF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGR.
CAGR vs GUDHF Comparison
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9438.00. In comparison, GUDHF has a market cap of 867.36M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while GUDHF trades at $6.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas GUDHF's P/E ratio is 17.19. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to GUDHF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR is more volatile compared to GUDHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGR.
CAGR vs SFHLF Comparison
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9438.00. In comparison, SFHLF has a market cap of 847.97M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while SFHLF trades at $18.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SFHLF's P/E ratio is 11.82. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to SFHLF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR is more volatile compared to SFHLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGR.
CAGR vs ATNNF Comparison
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9438.00. In comparison, ATNNF has a market cap of 775.56M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while ATNNF trades at $133.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ATNNF's P/E ratio is 12.84. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to ATNNF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR is more volatile compared to ATNNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGR.
CAGR vs ABDDF Comparison
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9438.00. In comparison, ABDDF has a market cap of 757.50M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while ABDDF trades at $33.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ABDDF's P/E ratio is 143.48. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to ABDDF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR is more volatile compared to ABDDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGR.
CAGR vs FAURY Comparison
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9438.00. In comparison, FAURY has a market cap of 709.61M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while FAURY trades at $3.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas FAURY's P/E ratio is -12.19. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to FAURY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR is more volatile compared to FAURY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGR.
CAGR vs FCVFF Comparison
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9438.00. In comparison, FCVFF has a market cap of 509.71M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while FCVFF trades at $10.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas FCVFF's P/E ratio is 9.33. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to FCVFF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR is more volatile compared to FCVFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGR.
CAGR vs NMAKF Comparison
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9438.00. In comparison, NMAKF has a market cap of 493.41M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while NMAKF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas NMAKF's P/E ratio is 16.27. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to NMAKF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR is more volatile compared to NMAKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGR.
CAGR vs MRETF Comparison
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9438.00. In comparison, MRETF has a market cap of 430.90M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while MRETF trades at $5.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas MRETF's P/E ratio is -10.57. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to MRETF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR is more volatile compared to MRETF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGR.
CAGR vs TCISF Comparison
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9438.00. In comparison, TCISF has a market cap of 419.96M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while TCISF trades at $12.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas TCISF's P/E ratio is 9.35. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to TCISF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR is more volatile compared to TCISF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGR.
CAGR vs SAEOF Comparison
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9438.00. In comparison, SAEOF has a market cap of 401.22M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while SAEOF trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SAEOF's P/E ratio is -0.41. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to SAEOF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR is more volatile compared to SAEOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGR.
CAGR vs VTSCY Comparison
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9438.00. In comparison, VTSCY has a market cap of 400.21M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while VTSCY trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas VTSCY's P/E ratio is 76.92. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to VTSCY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR is more volatile compared to VTSCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGR.
CAGR vs PWRHF Comparison
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9438.00. In comparison, PWRHF has a market cap of 371.08M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while PWRHF trades at $3.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas PWRHF's P/E ratio is 23.06. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to PWRHF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR is more volatile compared to PWRHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGR.
CAGR vs ELLRY Comparison
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9438.00. In comparison, ELLRY has a market cap of 361.15M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while ELLRY trades at $2.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ELLRY's P/E ratio is -2.30. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to ELLRY's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR is more volatile compared to ELLRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGR.
CAGR vs EGKLF Comparison
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9438.00. In comparison, EGKLF has a market cap of 302.70M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while EGKLF trades at $4.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas EGKLF's P/E ratio is -1.83. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to EGKLF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR is more volatile compared to EGKLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGR.
CAGR vs NPSGF Comparison
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9438.00. In comparison, NPSGF has a market cap of 294.64M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while NPSGF trades at $3.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas NPSGF's P/E ratio is 6.31. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to NPSGF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR is more volatile compared to NPSGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGR.
CAGR vs NPSGY Comparison
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9438.00. In comparison, NPSGY has a market cap of 265.78M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while NPSGY trades at $2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas NPSGY's P/E ratio is -1.84. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to NPSGY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR is more volatile compared to NPSGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGR.
CAGR vs XNGIF Comparison
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9438.00. In comparison, XNGIF has a market cap of 244.67M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while XNGIF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas XNGIF's P/E ratio is 12.85. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to XNGIF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR is more volatile compared to XNGIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGR.
CAGR vs IOCJY Comparison
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9438.00. In comparison, IOCJY has a market cap of 224.68M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while IOCJY trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas IOCJY's P/E ratio is 5.56. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to IOCJY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR is more volatile compared to IOCJY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGR.
CAGR vs WLMTF Comparison
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9438.00. In comparison, WLMTF has a market cap of 197.89M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while WLMTF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas WLMTF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to WLMTF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR is more volatile compared to WLMTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGR.
CAGR vs EXCOF Comparison
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9438.00. In comparison, EXCOF has a market cap of 182.54M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while EXCOF trades at $4.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas EXCOF's P/E ratio is 9.71. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to EXCOF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR is more volatile compared to EXCOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGR.
CAGR vs AKBIF Comparison
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9438.00. In comparison, AKBIF has a market cap of 181.28M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while AKBIF trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas AKBIF's P/E ratio is 9.54. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to AKBIF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR is more volatile compared to AKBIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGR.
CAGR vs AMGRF Comparison
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9438.00. In comparison, AMGRF has a market cap of 162.61M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while AMGRF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas AMGRF's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to AMGRF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR is more volatile compared to AMGRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGR.
CAGR vs HWAFF Comparison
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9438.00. In comparison, HWAFF has a market cap of 158.02M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while HWAFF trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas HWAFF's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to HWAFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR is more volatile compared to HWAFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGR.
CAGR vs KGAUF Comparison
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9438.00. In comparison, KGAUF has a market cap of 148.71M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while KGAUF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas KGAUF's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to KGAUF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR is more volatile compared to KGAUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGR.
CAGR vs SCTH Comparison
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9438.00. In comparison, SCTH has a market cap of 139.47M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while SCTH trades at $3.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SCTH's P/E ratio is -395.00. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to SCTH's ROE of +1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR is more volatile compared to SCTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGR.
CAGR vs CAOHF Comparison
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9438.00. In comparison, CAOHF has a market cap of 61.12M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while CAOHF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CAOHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to CAOHF's ROE of -14.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR is more volatile compared to CAOHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGR.
CAGR vs LEAT Comparison
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9438.00. In comparison, LEAT has a market cap of 49.86M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while LEAT trades at $8.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas LEAT's P/E ratio is -22.91. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to LEAT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR is more volatile compared to LEAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGR.
CAGR vs STSGF Comparison
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9438.00. In comparison, STSGF has a market cap of 38.71M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while STSGF trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas STSGF's P/E ratio is 19.36. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to STSGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR is more volatile compared to STSGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGR.
CAGR vs NWFAF Comparison
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9438.00. In comparison, NWFAF has a market cap of 37.88M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while NWFAF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas NWFAF's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to NWFAF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR is more volatile compared to NWFAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGR.
CAGR vs VOAXF Comparison
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9438.00. In comparison, VOAXF has a market cap of 27.00M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while VOAXF trades at $1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas VOAXF's P/E ratio is -3.07. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to VOAXF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR is more volatile compared to VOAXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGR.
CAGR vs CREVF Comparison
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9438.00. In comparison, CREVF has a market cap of 23.34M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while CREVF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CREVF's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to CREVF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR is more volatile compared to CREVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGR.
CAGR vs CCEGF Comparison
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9438.00. In comparison, CCEGF has a market cap of 20.56M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while CCEGF trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CCEGF's P/E ratio is -9.33. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to CCEGF's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR is more volatile compared to CCEGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGR.
CAGR vs CMMCF Comparison
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9438.00. In comparison, CMMCF has a market cap of 13.17M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while CMMCF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CMMCF's P/E ratio is -0.95. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to CMMCF's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR is more volatile compared to CMMCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGR.
CAGR vs ATHHF Comparison
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9438.00. In comparison, ATHHF has a market cap of 4.74M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while ATHHF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ATHHF's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to ATHHF's ROE of +1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR is more volatile compared to ATHHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGR.
CAGR vs UFMG Comparison
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9438.00. In comparison, UFMG has a market cap of 4.49M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while UFMG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas UFMG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to UFMG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR is more volatile compared to UFMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGR.
CAGR vs AFFL Comparison
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9438.00. In comparison, AFFL has a market cap of 4.47M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while AFFL trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas AFFL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to AFFL's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR is more volatile compared to AFFL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGR.
CAGR vs OPTI Comparison
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9438.00. In comparison, OPTI has a market cap of 3.76M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while OPTI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas OPTI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to OPTI's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR is more volatile compared to OPTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGR.
CAGR vs NFGRF Comparison
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9438.00. In comparison, NFGRF has a market cap of 2.82M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while NFGRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas NFGRF's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to NFGRF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR is more volatile compared to NFGRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGR.
CAGR vs AMTY Comparison
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9438.00. In comparison, AMTY has a market cap of 2.80M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while AMTY trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas AMTY's P/E ratio is 3.70. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to AMTY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR is more volatile compared to AMTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGR.
CAGR vs SPKTF Comparison
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9438.00. In comparison, SPKTF has a market cap of 1.77M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while SPKTF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SPKTF's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to SPKTF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR is more volatile compared to SPKTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGR.