California Grapes International, Inc.
California Grapes International, Inc. (CAGR) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CAGR) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAGR | $0.00 | +0.00% | 9.4K | -0.01 | -$0.00 | N/A |
| FYGGY | $1.85 | +0.00% | 75.1B | 16.36 | $0.11 | +3.33% |
| DNZOY | $14.20 | +0.02% | 41.2B | 14.71 | $0.98 | +1.66% |
| DNZOF | $14.84 | -0.02% | 40.1B | 14.86 | $0.98 | +2.93% |
| BRDCY | $22.03 | +0.00% | 29.8B | 22.33 | $1.00 | +1.98% |
| BRDCF | $41.00 | +0.00% | 27.3B | 20.60 | $1.99 | +3.57% |
| MGDDF | $37.61 | +0.00% | 26.6B | 3.38 | $11.17 | +4.13% |
| MGDDY | $18.57 | +0.00% | 26.6B | 8.43 | $2.23 | +4.01% |
| SMTOY | $26.77 | +0.00% | 21.4B | 16.37 | $1.68 | +1.37% |
| CTTAF | $85.51 | +0.00% | 17.9B | 13.72 | $6.51 | +2.80% |
Stock Comparison
CAGR vs FYGGY Comparison August 2025
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9.4K. In comparison, FYGGY has a market cap of 75.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while FYGGY trades at $1.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas FYGGY's P/E ratio is 16.36. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to FYGGY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR and FYGGY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FYGGY's competition here
CAGR vs DNZOY Comparison August 2025
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9.4K. In comparison, DNZOY has a market cap of 41.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while DNZOY trades at $14.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas DNZOY's P/E ratio is 14.71. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to DNZOY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR is less volatile compared to DNZOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGR.Check DNZOY's competition here
CAGR vs DNZOF Comparison August 2025
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9.4K. In comparison, DNZOF has a market cap of 40.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while DNZOF trades at $14.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas DNZOF's P/E ratio is 14.86. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to DNZOF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR is less volatile compared to DNZOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGR.Check DNZOF's competition here
CAGR vs BRDCY Comparison August 2025
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9.4K. In comparison, BRDCY has a market cap of 29.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while BRDCY trades at $22.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas BRDCY's P/E ratio is 22.33. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to BRDCY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR is less volatile compared to BRDCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGR.Check BRDCY's competition here
CAGR vs BRDCF Comparison August 2025
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9.4K. In comparison, BRDCF has a market cap of 27.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while BRDCF trades at $41.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas BRDCF's P/E ratio is 20.60. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to BRDCF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR and BRDCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BRDCF's competition here
CAGR vs MGDDF Comparison August 2025
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9.4K. In comparison, MGDDF has a market cap of 26.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while MGDDF trades at $37.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas MGDDF's P/E ratio is 3.38. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to MGDDF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR and MGDDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MGDDF's competition here
CAGR vs MGDDY Comparison August 2025
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9.4K. In comparison, MGDDY has a market cap of 26.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while MGDDY trades at $18.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas MGDDY's P/E ratio is 8.43. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to MGDDY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR is less volatile compared to MGDDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGR.Check MGDDY's competition here
CAGR vs SMTOY Comparison August 2025
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9.4K. In comparison, SMTOY has a market cap of 21.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while SMTOY trades at $26.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SMTOY's P/E ratio is 16.37. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to SMTOY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR is less volatile compared to SMTOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGR.Check SMTOY's competition here
CAGR vs CTTAF Comparison August 2025
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9.4K. In comparison, CTTAF has a market cap of 17.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while CTTAF trades at $85.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CTTAF's P/E ratio is 13.72. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to CTTAF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR is less volatile compared to CTTAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGR.Check CTTAF's competition here
CAGR vs CTTAY Comparison August 2025
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9.4K. In comparison, CTTAY has a market cap of 17.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while CTTAY trades at $8.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CTTAY's P/E ratio is 13.55. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to CTTAY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR is less volatile compared to CTTAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGR.Check CTTAY's competition here
CAGR vs KNRRY Comparison August 2025
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9.4K. In comparison, KNRRY has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while KNRRY trades at $26.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas KNRRY's P/E ratio is 34.79. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to KNRRY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR is less volatile compared to KNRRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGR.Check KNRRY's competition here
CAGR vs KNBHF Comparison August 2025
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9.4K. In comparison, KNBHF has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while KNBHF trades at $100.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas KNBHF's P/E ratio is 33.00. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to KNBHF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR and KNBHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KNBHF's competition here
CAGR vs PTAIY Comparison August 2025
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9.4K. In comparison, PTAIY has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while PTAIY trades at $6.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas PTAIY's P/E ratio is 6.26. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to PTAIY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR is less volatile compared to PTAIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGR.Check PTAIY's competition here
CAGR vs PTAIF Comparison August 2025
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9.4K. In comparison, PTAIF has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while PTAIF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas PTAIF's P/E ratio is 6.00. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to PTAIF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR and PTAIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PTAIF's competition here
CAGR vs ASEKY Comparison August 2025
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9.4K. In comparison, ASEKY has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while ASEKY trades at $15.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ASEKY's P/E ratio is 16.56. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to ASEKY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR and ASEKY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ASEKY's competition here
CAGR vs HLLGY Comparison August 2025
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9.4K. In comparison, HLLGY has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while HLLGY trades at $50.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas HLLGY's P/E ratio is 49.68. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to HLLGY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR and HLLGY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HLLGY's competition here
CAGR vs HLKHF Comparison August 2025
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9.4K. In comparison, HLKHF has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while HLKHF trades at $92.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas HLKHF's P/E ratio is 25.78. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to HLKHF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR and HLKHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HLKHF's competition here
CAGR vs ASEKF Comparison August 2025
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9.4K. In comparison, ASEKF has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while ASEKF trades at $10.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ASEKF's P/E ratio is 10.50. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to ASEKF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR and ASEKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ASEKF's competition here
CAGR vs NGKSY Comparison August 2025
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9.4K. In comparison, NGKSY has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while NGKSY trades at $18.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas NGKSY's P/E ratio is 11.55. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to NGKSY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR and NGKSY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NGKSY's competition here
CAGR vs PLLIF Comparison August 2025
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9.4K. In comparison, PLLIF has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while PLLIF trades at $6.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas PLLIF's P/E ratio is 11.79. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to PLLIF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR and PLLIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PLLIF's competition here
CAGR vs NGKSF Comparison August 2025
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9.4K. In comparison, NGKSF has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while NGKSF trades at $30.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas NGKSF's P/E ratio is 9.33. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to NGKSF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR is less volatile compared to NGKSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGR.Check NGKSF's competition here
CAGR vs SFFLY Comparison August 2025
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9.4K. In comparison, SFFLY has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while SFFLY trades at $5.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SFFLY's P/E ratio is -3.90. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to SFFLY's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR and SFFLY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SFFLY's competition here
CAGR vs MNTHY Comparison August 2025
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9.4K. In comparison, MNTHY has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while MNTHY trades at $73.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas MNTHY's P/E ratio is 13.56. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to MNTHY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR is less volatile compared to MNTHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGR.Check MNTHY's competition here
CAGR vs YORUY Comparison August 2025
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9.4K. In comparison, YORUY has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while YORUY trades at $26.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas YORUY's P/E ratio is 9.69. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to YORUY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR and YORUY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check YORUY's competition here
CAGR vs YORUF Comparison August 2025
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9.4K. In comparison, YORUF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while YORUF trades at $25.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas YORUF's P/E ratio is 8.68. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to YORUF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR and YORUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check YORUF's competition here
CAGR vs KOTMY Comparison August 2025
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9.4K. In comparison, KOTMY has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while KOTMY trades at $13.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas KOTMY's P/E ratio is 12.91. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to KOTMY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR is less volatile compared to KOTMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGR.Check KOTMY's competition here
CAGR vs BRBOY Comparison August 2025
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9.4K. In comparison, BRBOY has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while BRBOY trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas BRBOY's P/E ratio is 16.51. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to BRBOY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR is less volatile compared to BRBOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGR.Check BRBOY's competition here
CAGR vs MNTHF Comparison August 2025
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9.4K. In comparison, MNTHF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while MNTHF trades at $3.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas MNTHF's P/E ratio is 11.79. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to MNTHF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR and MNTHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MNTHF's competition here
CAGR vs SCFLF Comparison August 2025
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9.4K. In comparison, SCFLF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while SCFLF trades at $4.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SCFLF's P/E ratio is 9.60. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to SCFLF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR is less volatile compared to SCFLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGR.Check SCFLF's competition here
CAGR vs STAEY Comparison August 2025
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9.4K. In comparison, STAEY has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while STAEY trades at $11.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas STAEY's P/E ratio is 16.00. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to STAEY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR and STAEY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check STAEY's competition here
CAGR vs KOTMF Comparison August 2025
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9.4K. In comparison, KOTMF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while KOTMF trades at $11.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas KOTMF's P/E ratio is 11.27. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to KOTMF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR and KOTMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KOTMF's competition here
CAGR vs BRBOF Comparison August 2025
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9.4K. In comparison, BRBOF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while BRBOF trades at $10.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas BRBOF's P/E ratio is 13.73. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to BRBOF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR is less volatile compared to BRBOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGR.Check BRBOF's competition here
CAGR vs LIMAF Comparison August 2025
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9.4K. In comparison, LIMAF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while LIMAF trades at $52.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas LIMAF's P/E ratio is 20.68. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to LIMAF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR is less volatile compared to LIMAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGR.Check LIMAF's competition here
CAGR vs SMTUF Comparison August 2025
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9.4K. In comparison, SMTUF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while SMTUF trades at $11.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SMTUF's P/E ratio is -31.91. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to SMTUF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR and SMTUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SMTUF's competition here
CAGR vs STAEF Comparison August 2025
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9.4K. In comparison, STAEF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while STAEF trades at $20.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas STAEF's P/E ratio is 14.53. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to STAEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR and STAEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check STAEF's competition here
CAGR vs VLEEF Comparison August 2025
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9.4K. In comparison, VLEEF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while VLEEF trades at $11.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas VLEEF's P/E ratio is 21.08. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to VLEEF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR and VLEEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VLEEF's competition here
CAGR vs VLEEY Comparison August 2025
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9.4K. In comparison, VLEEY has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while VLEEY trades at $5.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas VLEEY's P/E ratio is 20.90. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to VLEEY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR is less volatile compared to VLEEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGR.Check VLEEY's competition here
CAGR vs JEHLY Comparison August 2025
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9.4K. In comparison, JEHLY has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while JEHLY trades at $27.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas JEHLY's P/E ratio is 9.90. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to JEHLY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR and JEHLY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check JEHLY's competition here
CAGR vs FURCF Comparison August 2025
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9.4K. In comparison, FURCF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while FURCF trades at $12.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas FURCF's P/E ratio is -4.69. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to FURCF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR and FURCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FURCF's competition here
CAGR vs JELCF Comparison August 2025
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9.4K. In comparison, JELCF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while JELCF trades at $2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas JELCF's P/E ratio is 9.64. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to JELCF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR is less volatile compared to JELCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGR.Check JELCF's competition here
CAGR vs NPSKY Comparison August 2025
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9.4K. In comparison, NPSKY has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while NPSKY trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas NPSKY's P/E ratio is 29.41. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to NPSKY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR and NPSKY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NPSKY's competition here
CAGR vs NHKGF Comparison August 2025
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9.4K. In comparison, NHKGF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while NHKGF trades at $11.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas NHKGF's P/E ratio is 7.60. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to NHKGF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR and NHKGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NHKGF's competition here
CAGR vs TGOSY Comparison August 2025
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9.4K. In comparison, TGOSY has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while TGOSY trades at $37.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas TGOSY's P/E ratio is 9.64. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to TGOSY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR and TGOSY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TGOSY's competition here
CAGR vs TDBOF Comparison August 2025
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9.4K. In comparison, TDBOF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while TDBOF trades at $13.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas TDBOF's P/E ratio is 20.34. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to TDBOF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR and TDBOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TDBOF's competition here
CAGR vs VTSCF Comparison August 2025
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9.4K. In comparison, VTSCF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while VTSCF trades at $56.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas VTSCF's P/E ratio is 82.35. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to VTSCF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR and VTSCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VTSCF's competition here
CAGR vs NIFCY Comparison August 2025
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9.4K. In comparison, NIFCY has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while NIFCY trades at $12.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas NIFCY's P/E ratio is 7.76. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to NIFCY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR and NIFCY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NIFCY's competition here
CAGR vs NPSKF Comparison August 2025
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9.4K. In comparison, NPSKF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while NPSKF trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas NPSKF's P/E ratio is 32.14. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to NPSKF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR and NPSKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NPSKF's competition here
CAGR vs ARBFF Comparison August 2025
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9.4K. In comparison, ARBFF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while ARBFF trades at $24.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ARBFF's P/E ratio is 31.15. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to ARBFF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR and ARBFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ARBFF's competition here
CAGR vs NTXVF Comparison August 2025
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9.4K. In comparison, NTXVF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while NTXVF trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas NTXVF's P/E ratio is 20.07. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to NTXVF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR and NTXVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NTXVF's competition here
CAGR vs MBUMY Comparison August 2025
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9.4K. In comparison, MBUMY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while MBUMY trades at $7.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas MBUMY's P/E ratio is 29.10. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to MBUMY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR and MBUMY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MBUMY's competition here
CAGR vs MBUMF Comparison August 2025
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9.4K. In comparison, MBUMF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while MBUMF trades at $13.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas MBUMF's P/E ratio is 18.65. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to MBUMF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR and MBUMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MBUMF's competition here
CAGR vs GMPUF Comparison August 2025
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9.4K. In comparison, GMPUF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while GMPUF trades at $2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas GMPUF's P/E ratio is 9.22. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to GMPUF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR and GMPUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GMPUF's competition here
CAGR vs UNIEF Comparison August 2025
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9.4K. In comparison, UNIEF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while UNIEF trades at $35.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas UNIEF's P/E ratio is 24.13. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to UNIEF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR is less volatile compared to UNIEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGR.Check UNIEF's competition here
CAGR vs FAURY Comparison August 2025
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9.4K. In comparison, FAURY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while FAURY trades at $1.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas FAURY's P/E ratio is -6.89. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to FAURY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR and FAURY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FAURY's competition here
CAGR vs PASTF Comparison August 2025
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9.4K. In comparison, PASTF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while PASTF trades at $9.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas PASTF's P/E ratio is 8.05. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to PASTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR and PASTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PASTF's competition here
CAGR vs NKRKY Comparison August 2025
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9.4K. In comparison, NKRKY has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while NKRKY trades at $4.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas NKRKY's P/E ratio is -30.13. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to NKRKY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR and NKRKY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NKRKY's competition here
CAGR vs NKRKF Comparison August 2025
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9.4K. In comparison, NKRKF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while NKRKF trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas NKRKF's P/E ratio is -29.03. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to NKRKF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR and NKRKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NKRKF's competition here
CAGR vs TIANF Comparison August 2025
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9.4K. In comparison, TIANF has a market cap of 939.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while TIANF trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas TIANF's P/E ratio is 3.79. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to TIANF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR and TIANF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TIANF's competition here
CAGR vs SFHLF Comparison August 2025
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9.4K. In comparison, SFHLF has a market cap of 817.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while SFHLF trades at $18.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SFHLF's P/E ratio is 11.05. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to SFHLF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR and SFHLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SFHLF's competition here
CAGR vs GUDDY Comparison August 2025
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9.4K. In comparison, GUDDY has a market cap of 796M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while GUDDY trades at $11.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas GUDDY's P/E ratio is 25.42. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to GUDDY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR and GUDDY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GUDDY's competition here
CAGR vs ATNNF Comparison August 2025
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9.4K. In comparison, ATNNF has a market cap of 777M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while ATNNF trades at $133.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ATNNF's P/E ratio is 12.84. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to ATNNF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR and ATNNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ATNNF's competition here
CAGR vs ABDDF Comparison August 2025
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9.4K. In comparison, ABDDF has a market cap of 757.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while ABDDF trades at $33.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ABDDF's P/E ratio is 143.48. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to ABDDF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR and ABDDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ABDDF's competition here
CAGR vs GUDHF Comparison August 2025
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9.4K. In comparison, GUDHF has a market cap of 692.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while GUDHF trades at $5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas GUDHF's P/E ratio is -10.20. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to GUDHF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR and GUDHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GUDHF's competition here
CAGR vs FCVFF Comparison August 2025
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9.4K. In comparison, FCVFF has a market cap of 509.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while FCVFF trades at $10.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas FCVFF's P/E ratio is 9.33. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to FCVFF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR and FCVFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FCVFF's competition here
CAGR vs MRETF Comparison August 2025
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9.4K. In comparison, MRETF has a market cap of 500.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while MRETF trades at $6.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas MRETF's P/E ratio is -11.86. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to MRETF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR is less volatile compared to MRETF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGR.Check MRETF's competition here
CAGR vs NMAKF Comparison August 2025
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9.4K. In comparison, NMAKF has a market cap of 494.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while NMAKF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas NMAKF's P/E ratio is -5.64. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to NMAKF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR and NMAKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NMAKF's competition here
CAGR vs IOCJY Comparison August 2025
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9.4K. In comparison, IOCJY has a market cap of 427.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while IOCJY trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas IOCJY's P/E ratio is 8.64. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to IOCJY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR and IOCJY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IOCJY's competition here
CAGR vs TCISF Comparison August 2025
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9.4K. In comparison, TCISF has a market cap of 420M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while TCISF trades at $12.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas TCISF's P/E ratio is 9.35. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to TCISF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR and TCISF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TCISF's competition here
CAGR vs SAEOF Comparison August 2025
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9.4K. In comparison, SAEOF has a market cap of 401.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while SAEOF trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SAEOF's P/E ratio is -0.41. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to SAEOF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR and SAEOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SAEOF's competition here
CAGR vs VTSCY Comparison August 2025
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9.4K. In comparison, VTSCY has a market cap of 400.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while VTSCY trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas VTSCY's P/E ratio is 76.92. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to VTSCY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR and VTSCY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VTSCY's competition here
CAGR vs PWRHF Comparison August 2025
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9.4K. In comparison, PWRHF has a market cap of 371.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while PWRHF trades at $3.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas PWRHF's P/E ratio is 23.06. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to PWRHF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR and PWRHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PWRHF's competition here
CAGR vs NPSGF Comparison August 2025
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9.4K. In comparison, NPSGF has a market cap of 320.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while NPSGF trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas NPSGF's P/E ratio is -2.99. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to NPSGF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR and NPSGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NPSGF's competition here
CAGR vs ELLRY Comparison August 2025
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9.4K. In comparison, ELLRY has a market cap of 304.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while ELLRY trades at $2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ELLRY's P/E ratio is -1.56. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to ELLRY's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR and ELLRY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ELLRY's competition here
CAGR vs EGKLF Comparison August 2025
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9.4K. In comparison, EGKLF has a market cap of 302.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while EGKLF trades at $4.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas EGKLF's P/E ratio is -1.81. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to EGKLF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR and EGKLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EGKLF's competition here
CAGR vs NPSGY Comparison August 2025
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9.4K. In comparison, NPSGY has a market cap of 288.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while NPSGY trades at $2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas NPSGY's P/E ratio is -1.79. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to NPSGY's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR and NPSGY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NPSGY's competition here
CAGR vs XNGIF Comparison August 2025
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9.4K. In comparison, XNGIF has a market cap of 244.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while XNGIF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas XNGIF's P/E ratio is 6.43. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to XNGIF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR and XNGIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check XNGIF's competition here
CAGR vs WLMTF Comparison August 2025
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9.4K. In comparison, WLMTF has a market cap of 216.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while WLMTF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas WLMTF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to WLMTF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR and WLMTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WLMTF's competition here
CAGR vs AKBIF Comparison August 2025
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9.4K. In comparison, AKBIF has a market cap of 192.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while AKBIF trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas AKBIF's P/E ratio is 10.14. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to AKBIF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR and AKBIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AKBIF's competition here
CAGR vs AMGRF Comparison August 2025
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9.4K. In comparison, AMGRF has a market cap of 191.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while AMGRF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas AMGRF's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to AMGRF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR and AMGRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AMGRF's competition here
CAGR vs EXCOF Comparison August 2025
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9.4K. In comparison, EXCOF has a market cap of 187.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while EXCOF trades at $4.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas EXCOF's P/E ratio is 10.92. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to EXCOF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR and EXCOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EXCOF's competition here
CAGR vs SCTH Comparison August 2025
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9.4K. In comparison, SCTH has a market cap of 163.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while SCTH trades at $4.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SCTH's P/E ratio is -464.00. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to SCTH's ROE of +1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR and SCTH have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SCTH's competition here
CAGR vs HWAFF Comparison August 2025
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9.4K. In comparison, HWAFF has a market cap of 158M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while HWAFF trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas HWAFF's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to HWAFF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR and HWAFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HWAFF's competition here
CAGR vs KGAUF Comparison August 2025
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9.4K. In comparison, KGAUF has a market cap of 120.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while KGAUF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas KGAUF's P/E ratio is -6.50. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to KGAUF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR and KGAUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KGAUF's competition here
CAGR vs FESTF Comparison August 2025
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9.4K. In comparison, FESTF has a market cap of 101.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while FESTF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas FESTF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to FESTF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR and FESTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FESTF's competition here
CAGR vs LEAT Comparison August 2025
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9.4K. In comparison, LEAT has a market cap of 90.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while LEAT trades at $11.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas LEAT's P/E ratio is 48.33. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to LEAT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR is less volatile compared to LEAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGR.Check LEAT's competition here
CAGR vs CAOHF Comparison August 2025
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9.4K. In comparison, CAOHF has a market cap of 61.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while CAOHF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CAOHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to CAOHF's ROE of -14.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR and CAOHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CAOHF's competition here
CAGR vs CCEGF Comparison August 2025
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9.4K. In comparison, CCEGF has a market cap of 48.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while CCEGF trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CCEGF's P/E ratio is -22.00. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to CCEGF's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR and CCEGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CCEGF's competition here
CAGR vs NFGRF Comparison August 2025
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9.4K. In comparison, NFGRF has a market cap of 41M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while NFGRF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas NFGRF's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to NFGRF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR and NFGRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NFGRF's competition here
CAGR vs STSGF Comparison August 2025
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9.4K. In comparison, STSGF has a market cap of 38.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while STSGF trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas STSGF's P/E ratio is 19.36. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to STSGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR and STSGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check STSGF's competition here
CAGR vs NWFAF Comparison August 2025
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9.4K. In comparison, NWFAF has a market cap of 37.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while NWFAF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas NWFAF's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to NWFAF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR and NWFAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NWFAF's competition here
CAGR vs VOAXF Comparison August 2025
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9.4K. In comparison, VOAXF has a market cap of 27M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while VOAXF trades at $1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas VOAXF's P/E ratio is -3.07. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to VOAXF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR and VOAXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VOAXF's competition here
CAGR vs CREVF Comparison August 2025
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9.4K. In comparison, CREVF has a market cap of 23.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while CREVF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CREVF's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to CREVF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR and CREVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CREVF's competition here
CAGR vs CMMCF Comparison August 2025
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9.4K. In comparison, CMMCF has a market cap of 20.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while CMMCF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CMMCF's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to CMMCF's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR and CMMCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CMMCF's competition here
CAGR vs ATHHF Comparison August 2025
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9.4K. In comparison, ATHHF has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while ATHHF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ATHHF's P/E ratio is -7.40. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to ATHHF's ROE of +1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR is less volatile compared to ATHHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGR.Check ATHHF's competition here
CAGR vs UFMG Comparison August 2025
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9.4K. In comparison, UFMG has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while UFMG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas UFMG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to UFMG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR and UFMG have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check UFMG's competition here
CAGR vs AFFL Comparison August 2025
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9.4K. In comparison, AFFL has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while AFFL trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas AFFL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to AFFL's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR and AFFL have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AFFL's competition here
CAGR vs CDTI Comparison August 2025
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9.4K. In comparison, CDTI has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while CDTI trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CDTI's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to CDTI's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR is less volatile compared to CDTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGR.Check CDTI's competition here
CAGR vs OPTI Comparison August 2025
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9.4K. In comparison, OPTI has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while OPTI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas OPTI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to OPTI's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR is less volatile compared to OPTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAGR.Check OPTI's competition here
CAGR vs AMTY Comparison August 2025
CAGR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAGR stands at 9.4K. In comparison, AMTY has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CAGR is priced at $0.00, while AMTY trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAGR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas AMTY's P/E ratio is 3.50. In terms of profitability, CAGR's ROE is +32.17%, compared to AMTY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CAGR and AMTY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AMTY's competition here