Circus SE (CA1.MU) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

CA1.MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CA1.MU stands at 111.5M. In comparison, WDP.DE has a market cap of 147.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CA1.MU is priced at €2.90, while WDP.DE trades at €85.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CA1.MU currently has a P/E ratio of -12.08, whereas WDP.DE's P/E ratio is 12.33. In terms of profitability, CA1.MU's ROE is -0.97%, compared to WDP.DE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CA1.MU is more volatile compared to WDP.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CA1.MU.Check WDP.DE's competition here

CA1.MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CA1.MU stands at 111.5M. In comparison, 3LN.DE has a market cap of 36.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CA1.MU is priced at €2.90, while 3LN.DE trades at €155.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CA1.MU currently has a P/E ratio of -12.08, whereas 3LN.DE's P/E ratio is -1342.10. In terms of profitability, CA1.MU's ROE is -0.97%, compared to 3LN.DE's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CA1.MU is more volatile compared to 3LN.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CA1.MU.Check 3LN.DE's competition here

CA1.MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CA1.MU stands at 111.5M. In comparison, RDO.DE has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, CA1.MU is priced at €2.90, while RDO.DE trades at €4.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CA1.MU currently has a P/E ratio of -12.08, whereas RDO.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CA1.MU's ROE is -0.97%, compared to RDO.DE's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, CA1.MU is more volatile compared to RDO.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CA1.MU.Check RDO.DE's competition here

CA1.MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CA1.MU stands at 111.5M. In comparison, CQD.DE has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CA1.MU is priced at €2.90, while CQD.DE trades at €115.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CA1.MU currently has a P/E ratio of -12.08, whereas CQD.DE's P/E ratio is 3.41. In terms of profitability, CA1.MU's ROE is -0.97%, compared to CQD.DE's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CA1.MU is more volatile compared to CQD.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CA1.MU.Check CQD.DE's competition here

CA1.MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CA1.MU stands at 111.5M. In comparison, WBAH.DE has a market cap of 684.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CA1.MU is priced at €2.90, while WBAH.DE trades at €28.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CA1.MU currently has a P/E ratio of -12.08, whereas WBAH.DE's P/E ratio is -8.97. In terms of profitability, CA1.MU's ROE is -0.97%, compared to WBAH.DE's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, CA1.MU is more volatile compared to WBAH.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CA1.MU.Check WBAH.DE's competition here

CA1.MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CA1.MU stands at 111.5M. In comparison, CAP.DE has a market cap of 35.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CA1.MU is priced at €2.90, while CAP.DE trades at €1.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CA1.MU currently has a P/E ratio of -12.08, whereas CAP.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CA1.MU's ROE is -0.97%, compared to CAP.DE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CA1.MU is more volatile compared to CAP.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CA1.MU.Check CAP.DE's competition here

CA1.MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CA1.MU stands at 111.5M. In comparison, HLG.DE has a market cap of 28.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CA1.MU is priced at €2.90, while HLG.DE trades at €0.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CA1.MU currently has a P/E ratio of -12.08, whereas HLG.DE's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, CA1.MU's ROE is -0.97%, compared to HLG.DE's ROE of -1.93%. Regarding short-term risk, CA1.MU is more volatile compared to HLG.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CA1.MU.Check HLG.DE's competition here

CA1.MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CA1.MU stands at 111.5M. In comparison, EMH.DE has a market cap of 15.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CA1.MU is priced at €2.90, while EMH.DE trades at €2.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CA1.MU currently has a P/E ratio of -12.08, whereas EMH.DE's P/E ratio is -3.22. In terms of profitability, CA1.MU's ROE is -0.97%, compared to EMH.DE's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CA1.MU is more volatile compared to EMH.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CA1.MU.Check EMH.DE's competition here

CA1.MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CA1.MU stands at 111.5M. In comparison, EOT.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CA1.MU is priced at €2.90, while EOT.DE trades at €18.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CA1.MU currently has a P/E ratio of -12.08, whereas EOT.DE's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, CA1.MU's ROE is -0.97%, compared to EOT.DE's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CA1.MU is more volatile compared to EOT.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CA1.MU.Check EOT.DE's competition here

CA1.MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CA1.MU stands at 111.5M. In comparison, DC6.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CA1.MU is priced at €2.90, while DC6.DE trades at €22.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CA1.MU currently has a P/E ratio of -12.08, whereas DC6.DE's P/E ratio is 13.78. In terms of profitability, CA1.MU's ROE is -0.97%, compared to DC6.DE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CA1.MU is more volatile compared to DC6.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CA1.MU.Check DC6.DE's competition here

CA1.MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CA1.MU stands at 111.5M. In comparison, AIY.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CA1.MU is priced at €2.90, while AIY.DE trades at €89.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CA1.MU currently has a P/E ratio of -12.08, whereas AIY.DE's P/E ratio is 34.75. In terms of profitability, CA1.MU's ROE is -0.97%, compared to AIY.DE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CA1.MU is more volatile compared to AIY.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CA1.MU.Check AIY.DE's competition here