Compleo Charging Solutions AG
Compleo Charging Solutions AG (C0M.DE) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (C0M.DE) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C0M.DE | €2.82 | +0.00% | 18.2M | -0.45 | -€6.25 | N/A |
| KBX.DE | €98.80 | -1.89% | 15.9B | 36.73 | €2.69 | +1.77% |
| CON.DE | €62.74 | +0.00% | 12.5B | -29.88 | -€2.10 | +3.98% |
| HLE.DE | €73.90 | -1.47% | 8.2B | 50.62 | €1.46 | +1.29% |
| SHA0.DE | €7.20 | -2.77% | 6.8B | -4.97 | -€1.45 | +3.47% |
| AMV0.DE | €34.78 | -1.14% | 3.5B | -5.32 | -€6.54 | N/A |
| SHA.DE | €4.58 | +3.79% | 3B | 10.17 | €0.45 | N/A |
| GTR.DE | €7.97 | +0.18% | 2.3B | -4.92 | -€1.62 | N/A |
| VTSC.DE | €52.90 | -0.09% | 2.1B | 85.32 | €0.62 | N/A |
| SFQ.DE | €16.60 | -2.70% | 753.5M | 14.82 | €1.12 | +5.12% |
Stock Comparison
C0M.DE vs KBX.DE Comparison April 2026
C0M.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, C0M.DE stands at 18.2M. In comparison, KBX.DE has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, C0M.DE is priced at €2.82, while KBX.DE trades at €98.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
C0M.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas KBX.DE's P/E ratio is 36.73. In terms of profitability, C0M.DE's ROE is -2.18%, compared to KBX.DE's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, C0M.DE is more volatile compared to KBX.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for C0M.DE.Check KBX.DE's competition here
C0M.DE vs CON.DE Comparison April 2026
C0M.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, C0M.DE stands at 18.2M. In comparison, CON.DE has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, C0M.DE is priced at €2.82, while CON.DE trades at €62.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
C0M.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas CON.DE's P/E ratio is -29.88. In terms of profitability, C0M.DE's ROE is -2.18%, compared to CON.DE's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, C0M.DE is more volatile compared to CON.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for C0M.DE.Check CON.DE's competition here
C0M.DE vs HLE.DE Comparison April 2026
C0M.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, C0M.DE stands at 18.2M. In comparison, HLE.DE has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, C0M.DE is priced at €2.82, while HLE.DE trades at €73.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
C0M.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas HLE.DE's P/E ratio is 50.62. In terms of profitability, C0M.DE's ROE is -2.18%, compared to HLE.DE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, C0M.DE is more volatile compared to HLE.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for C0M.DE.Check HLE.DE's competition here
C0M.DE vs SHA0.DE Comparison April 2026
C0M.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, C0M.DE stands at 18.2M. In comparison, SHA0.DE has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, C0M.DE is priced at €2.82, while SHA0.DE trades at €7.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
C0M.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas SHA0.DE's P/E ratio is -4.97. In terms of profitability, C0M.DE's ROE is -2.18%, compared to SHA0.DE's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, C0M.DE is more volatile compared to SHA0.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for C0M.DE.Check SHA0.DE's competition here
C0M.DE vs AMV0.DE Comparison April 2026
C0M.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, C0M.DE stands at 18.2M. In comparison, AMV0.DE has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, C0M.DE is priced at €2.82, while AMV0.DE trades at €34.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
C0M.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas AMV0.DE's P/E ratio is -5.32. In terms of profitability, C0M.DE's ROE is -2.18%, compared to AMV0.DE's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, C0M.DE is more volatile compared to AMV0.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for C0M.DE.Check AMV0.DE's competition here
C0M.DE vs SHA.DE Comparison April 2026
C0M.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, C0M.DE stands at 18.2M. In comparison, SHA.DE has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, C0M.DE is priced at €2.82, while SHA.DE trades at €4.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
C0M.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas SHA.DE's P/E ratio is 10.17. In terms of profitability, C0M.DE's ROE is -2.18%, compared to SHA.DE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, C0M.DE is more volatile compared to SHA.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for C0M.DE.Check SHA.DE's competition here
C0M.DE vs GTR.DE Comparison April 2026
C0M.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, C0M.DE stands at 18.2M. In comparison, GTR.DE has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, C0M.DE is priced at €2.82, while GTR.DE trades at €7.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
C0M.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas GTR.DE's P/E ratio is -4.92. In terms of profitability, C0M.DE's ROE is -2.18%, compared to GTR.DE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, C0M.DE is more volatile compared to GTR.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for C0M.DE.Check GTR.DE's competition here
C0M.DE vs VTSC.DE Comparison April 2026
C0M.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, C0M.DE stands at 18.2M. In comparison, VTSC.DE has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, C0M.DE is priced at €2.82, while VTSC.DE trades at €52.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
C0M.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas VTSC.DE's P/E ratio is 85.32. In terms of profitability, C0M.DE's ROE is -2.18%, compared to VTSC.DE's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, C0M.DE is more volatile compared to VTSC.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for C0M.DE.Check VTSC.DE's competition here
C0M.DE vs SFQ.DE Comparison April 2026
C0M.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, C0M.DE stands at 18.2M. In comparison, SFQ.DE has a market cap of 753.5M. Regarding current trading prices, C0M.DE is priced at €2.82, while SFQ.DE trades at €16.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
C0M.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas SFQ.DE's P/E ratio is 14.82. In terms of profitability, C0M.DE's ROE is -2.18%, compared to SFQ.DE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, C0M.DE is more volatile compared to SFQ.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for C0M.DE.Check SFQ.DE's competition here
C0M.DE vs ZIL2.DE Comparison April 2026
C0M.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, C0M.DE stands at 18.2M. In comparison, ZIL2.DE has a market cap of 352.3M. Regarding current trading prices, C0M.DE is priced at €2.82, while ZIL2.DE trades at €5.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
C0M.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas ZIL2.DE's P/E ratio is -3.05. In terms of profitability, C0M.DE's ROE is -2.18%, compared to ZIL2.DE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, C0M.DE is more volatile compared to ZIL2.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for C0M.DE.Check ZIL2.DE's competition here
C0M.DE vs PSQ.F Comparison April 2026
C0M.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, C0M.DE stands at 18.2M. In comparison, PSQ.F has a market cap of 153.1M. Regarding current trading prices, C0M.DE is priced at €2.82, while PSQ.F trades at €0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
C0M.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas PSQ.F's P/E ratio is 7.20. In terms of profitability, C0M.DE's ROE is -2.18%, compared to PSQ.F's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, C0M.DE is more volatile compared to PSQ.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for C0M.DE.Check PSQ.F's competition here
C0M.DE vs BDT.DE Comparison April 2026
C0M.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, C0M.DE stands at 18.2M. In comparison, BDT.DE has a market cap of 151.8M. Regarding current trading prices, C0M.DE is priced at €2.82, while BDT.DE trades at €15.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
C0M.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas BDT.DE's P/E ratio is -2.87. In terms of profitability, C0M.DE's ROE is -2.18%, compared to BDT.DE's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, C0M.DE is more volatile compared to BDT.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for C0M.DE.Check BDT.DE's competition here
C0M.DE vs GMM.DE Comparison April 2026
C0M.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, C0M.DE stands at 18.2M. In comparison, GMM.DE has a market cap of 112.6M. Regarding current trading prices, C0M.DE is priced at €2.82, while GMM.DE trades at €7.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
C0M.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas GMM.DE's P/E ratio is 6.74. In terms of profitability, C0M.DE's ROE is -2.18%, compared to GMM.DE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, C0M.DE is more volatile compared to GMM.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for C0M.DE.Check GMM.DE's competition here
C0M.DE vs NVM.DE Comparison April 2026
C0M.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, C0M.DE stands at 18.2M. In comparison, NVM.DE has a market cap of 110.6M. Regarding current trading prices, C0M.DE is priced at €2.82, while NVM.DE trades at €2.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
C0M.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas NVM.DE's P/E ratio is 5.71. In terms of profitability, C0M.DE's ROE is -2.18%, compared to NVM.DE's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, C0M.DE is more volatile compared to NVM.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for C0M.DE.Check NVM.DE's competition here
C0M.DE vs ED4.DE Comparison April 2026
C0M.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, C0M.DE stands at 18.2M. In comparison, ED4.DE has a market cap of 97.5M. Regarding current trading prices, C0M.DE is priced at €2.82, while ED4.DE trades at €3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
C0M.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas ED4.DE's P/E ratio is -2.24. In terms of profitability, C0M.DE's ROE is -2.18%, compared to ED4.DE's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, C0M.DE is more volatile compared to ED4.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for C0M.DE.Check ED4.DE's competition here
C0M.DE vs VOTR.DE Comparison April 2026
C0M.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, C0M.DE stands at 18.2M. In comparison, VOTR.DE has a market cap of 96M. Regarding current trading prices, C0M.DE is priced at €2.82, while VOTR.DE trades at €4.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
C0M.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas VOTR.DE's P/E ratio is -19.50. In terms of profitability, C0M.DE's ROE is -2.18%, compared to VOTR.DE's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, C0M.DE is more volatile compared to VOTR.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for C0M.DE.Check VOTR.DE's competition here
C0M.DE vs VBX.F Comparison April 2026
C0M.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, C0M.DE stands at 18.2M. In comparison, VBX.F has a market cap of 91.8M. Regarding current trading prices, C0M.DE is priced at €2.82, while VBX.F trades at €4.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
C0M.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas VBX.F's P/E ratio is -20.76. In terms of profitability, C0M.DE's ROE is -2.18%, compared to VBX.F's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, C0M.DE is more volatile compared to VBX.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for C0M.DE.Check VBX.F's competition here
C0M.DE vs VBX.DE Comparison April 2026
C0M.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, C0M.DE stands at 18.2M. In comparison, VBX.DE has a market cap of 88.5M. Regarding current trading prices, C0M.DE is priced at €2.82, while VBX.DE trades at €4.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
C0M.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas VBX.DE's P/E ratio is -20.00. In terms of profitability, C0M.DE's ROE is -2.18%, compared to VBX.DE's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, C0M.DE is more volatile compared to VBX.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for C0M.DE.Check VBX.DE's competition here
C0M.DE vs PWO.DE Comparison April 2026
C0M.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, C0M.DE stands at 18.2M. In comparison, PWO.DE has a market cap of 76.9M. Regarding current trading prices, C0M.DE is priced at €2.82, while PWO.DE trades at €24.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
C0M.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas PWO.DE's P/E ratio is 6.89. In terms of profitability, C0M.DE's ROE is -2.18%, compared to PWO.DE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, C0M.DE is more volatile compared to PWO.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for C0M.DE.Check PWO.DE's competition here
C0M.DE vs P4N.DE Comparison April 2026
C0M.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, C0M.DE stands at 18.2M. In comparison, P4N.DE has a market cap of 72.4M. Regarding current trading prices, C0M.DE is priced at €2.82, while P4N.DE trades at €3.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
C0M.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas P4N.DE's P/E ratio is -27.42. In terms of profitability, C0M.DE's ROE is -2.18%, compared to P4N.DE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, C0M.DE is more volatile compared to P4N.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for C0M.DE.Check P4N.DE's competition here
C0M.DE vs MSAG.DE Comparison April 2026
C0M.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, C0M.DE stands at 18.2M. In comparison, MSAG.DE has a market cap of 38.3M. Regarding current trading prices, C0M.DE is priced at €2.82, while MSAG.DE trades at €1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
C0M.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas MSAG.DE's P/E ratio is -5.16. In terms of profitability, C0M.DE's ROE is -2.18%, compared to MSAG.DE's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, C0M.DE is more volatile compared to MSAG.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for C0M.DE.Check MSAG.DE's competition here
C0M.DE vs DEX.DE Comparison April 2026
C0M.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, C0M.DE stands at 18.2M. In comparison, DEX.DE has a market cap of 33.4M. Regarding current trading prices, C0M.DE is priced at €2.82, while DEX.DE trades at €2.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
C0M.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas DEX.DE's P/E ratio is 8.14. In terms of profitability, C0M.DE's ROE is -2.18%, compared to DEX.DE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, C0M.DE is more volatile compared to DEX.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for C0M.DE.Check DEX.DE's competition here
C0M.DE vs H9W.DE Comparison April 2026
C0M.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, C0M.DE stands at 18.2M. In comparison, H9W.DE has a market cap of 32.7M. Regarding current trading prices, C0M.DE is priced at €2.82, while H9W.DE trades at €3.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
C0M.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas H9W.DE's P/E ratio is -1.68. In terms of profitability, C0M.DE's ROE is -2.18%, compared to H9W.DE's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, C0M.DE is more volatile compared to H9W.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for C0M.DE.Check H9W.DE's competition here
C0M.DE vs SF3.DE Comparison April 2026
C0M.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, C0M.DE stands at 18.2M. In comparison, SF3.DE has a market cap of 19M. Regarding current trading prices, C0M.DE is priced at €2.82, while SF3.DE trades at €2.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
C0M.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas SF3.DE's P/E ratio is -32.67. In terms of profitability, C0M.DE's ROE is -2.18%, compared to SF3.DE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, C0M.DE is more volatile compared to SF3.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for C0M.DE.Check SF3.DE's competition here
C0M.DE vs HGEA.DE Comparison April 2026
C0M.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, C0M.DE stands at 18.2M. In comparison, HGEA.DE has a market cap of 9.6M. Regarding current trading prices, C0M.DE is priced at €2.82, while HGEA.DE trades at €0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
C0M.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas HGEA.DE's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, C0M.DE's ROE is -2.18%, compared to HGEA.DE's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, C0M.DE is more volatile compared to HGEA.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for C0M.DE.Check HGEA.DE's competition here
C0M.DE vs IS7.DE Comparison April 2026
C0M.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, C0M.DE stands at 18.2M. In comparison, IS7.DE has a market cap of 8.1M. Regarding current trading prices, C0M.DE is priced at €2.82, while IS7.DE trades at €1.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
C0M.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas IS7.DE's P/E ratio is -2.12. In terms of profitability, C0M.DE's ROE is -2.18%, compared to IS7.DE's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, C0M.DE is more volatile compared to IS7.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for C0M.DE.Check IS7.DE's competition here
C0M.DE vs PGN.DE Comparison April 2026
C0M.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, C0M.DE stands at 18.2M. In comparison, PGN.DE has a market cap of 8M. Regarding current trading prices, C0M.DE is priced at €2.82, while PGN.DE trades at €1.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
C0M.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas PGN.DE's P/E ratio is -1.46. In terms of profitability, C0M.DE's ROE is -2.18%, compared to PGN.DE's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, C0M.DE is more volatile compared to PGN.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for C0M.DE.Check PGN.DE's competition here
C0M.DE vs SD1.DE Comparison April 2026
C0M.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, C0M.DE stands at 18.2M. In comparison, SD1.DE has a market cap of 4.6M. Regarding current trading prices, C0M.DE is priced at €2.82, while SD1.DE trades at €0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
C0M.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas SD1.DE's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, C0M.DE's ROE is -2.18%, compared to SD1.DE's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, C0M.DE is less volatile compared to SD1.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for C0M.DE.Check SD1.DE's competition here
C0M.DE vs TINC.DE Comparison April 2026
C0M.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, C0M.DE stands at 18.2M. In comparison, TINC.DE has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, C0M.DE is priced at €2.82, while TINC.DE trades at €0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
C0M.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas TINC.DE's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, C0M.DE's ROE is -2.18%, compared to TINC.DE's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, C0M.DE is more volatile compared to TINC.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for C0M.DE.Check TINC.DE's competition here
C0M.DE vs IQL.F Comparison April 2026
C0M.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, C0M.DE stands at 18.2M. In comparison, IQL.F has a market cap of 398.8K. Regarding current trading prices, C0M.DE is priced at €2.82, while IQL.F trades at €0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
C0M.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas IQL.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, C0M.DE's ROE is -2.18%, compared to IQL.F's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, C0M.DE is more volatile compared to IQL.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for C0M.DE.Check IQL.F's competition here
C0M.DE vs OSR.DE Comparison April 2026
C0M.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, C0M.DE stands at 18.2M. In comparison, OSR.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, C0M.DE is priced at €2.82, while OSR.DE trades at €52.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
C0M.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas OSR.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, C0M.DE's ROE is -2.18%, compared to OSR.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, C0M.DE is more volatile compared to OSR.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for C0M.DE.Check OSR.DE's competition here
C0M.DE vs DAI.DE Comparison April 2026
C0M.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, C0M.DE stands at 18.2M. In comparison, DAI.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, C0M.DE is priced at €2.82, while DAI.DE trades at €70.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
C0M.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas DAI.DE's P/E ratio is 5.42. In terms of profitability, C0M.DE's ROE is -2.18%, compared to DAI.DE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, C0M.DE is more volatile compared to DAI.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for C0M.DE.Check DAI.DE's competition here