Baylin Technologies Inc.
Baylin Technologies Inc. BYLTF Peers
See (BYLTF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Communication Equipment Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BYLTF | $0.20 | +0.05% | 30.84M | -5.09 | -$0.04 | N/A |
| ERIXF | $8.40 | +0.30% | 28.00B | 168.00 | $0.05 | +3.25% |
| NOKBF | $5.00 | -1.77% | 26.15B | 20.00 | $0.25 | +2.79% |
| ZTCOF | $2.86 | -4.67% | 19.49B | 12.43 | $0.23 | +6.36% |
| AACAY | $5.14 | -3.20% | 6.07B | 24.48 | $0.21 | +0.24% |
| AACAF | $4.75 | +23.38% | 5.61B | 22.62 | $0.21 | +0.88% |
| YZOFF | $1.03 | N/A | 2.74B | 4.90 | $0.21 | +1.05% |
| ETCMY | $1.17 | -3.31% | 2.22B | -2.02 | -$0.58 | N/A |
| VTKLY | $7.69 | +6.81% | 1.95B | 12.02 | $0.64 | +8.55% |
| HMNKF | $36.65 | N/A | 1.84B | 55.53 | $0.66 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
BYLTF vs ERIXF Comparison
BYLTF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYLTF stands at 30.84M. In comparison, ERIXF has a market cap of 28.00B. Regarding current trading prices, BYLTF is priced at $0.20, while ERIXF trades at $8.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.09, whereas ERIXF's P/E ratio is 168.00. In terms of profitability, BYLTF's ROE is +1.61%, compared to ERIXF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BYLTF and ERIXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BYLTF vs NOKBF Comparison
BYLTF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYLTF stands at 30.84M. In comparison, NOKBF has a market cap of 26.15B. Regarding current trading prices, BYLTF is priced at $0.20, while NOKBF trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.09, whereas NOKBF's P/E ratio is 20.00. In terms of profitability, BYLTF's ROE is +1.61%, compared to NOKBF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BYLTF is less volatile compared to NOKBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYLTF.
BYLTF vs ZTCOF Comparison
BYLTF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYLTF stands at 30.84M. In comparison, ZTCOF has a market cap of 19.49B. Regarding current trading prices, BYLTF is priced at $0.20, while ZTCOF trades at $2.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.09, whereas ZTCOF's P/E ratio is 12.43. In terms of profitability, BYLTF's ROE is +1.61%, compared to ZTCOF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BYLTF is less volatile compared to ZTCOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYLTF.
BYLTF vs AACAY Comparison
BYLTF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYLTF stands at 30.84M. In comparison, AACAY has a market cap of 6.07B. Regarding current trading prices, BYLTF is priced at $0.20, while AACAY trades at $5.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.09, whereas AACAY's P/E ratio is 24.48. In terms of profitability, BYLTF's ROE is +1.61%, compared to AACAY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BYLTF is less volatile compared to AACAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYLTF.
BYLTF vs AACAF Comparison
BYLTF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYLTF stands at 30.84M. In comparison, AACAF has a market cap of 5.61B. Regarding current trading prices, BYLTF is priced at $0.20, while AACAF trades at $4.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.09, whereas AACAF's P/E ratio is 22.62. In terms of profitability, BYLTF's ROE is +1.61%, compared to AACAF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BYLTF is less volatile compared to AACAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYLTF.
BYLTF vs YZOFF Comparison
BYLTF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYLTF stands at 30.84M. In comparison, YZOFF has a market cap of 2.74B. Regarding current trading prices, BYLTF is priced at $0.20, while YZOFF trades at $1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.09, whereas YZOFF's P/E ratio is 4.90. In terms of profitability, BYLTF's ROE is +1.61%, compared to YZOFF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BYLTF is less volatile compared to YZOFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYLTF.
BYLTF vs ETCMY Comparison
BYLTF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYLTF stands at 30.84M. In comparison, ETCMY has a market cap of 2.22B. Regarding current trading prices, BYLTF is priced at $0.20, while ETCMY trades at $1.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.09, whereas ETCMY's P/E ratio is -2.02. In terms of profitability, BYLTF's ROE is +1.61%, compared to ETCMY's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BYLTF is less volatile compared to ETCMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYLTF.
BYLTF vs VTKLY Comparison
BYLTF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYLTF stands at 30.84M. In comparison, VTKLY has a market cap of 1.95B. Regarding current trading prices, BYLTF is priced at $0.20, while VTKLY trades at $7.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.09, whereas VTKLY's P/E ratio is 12.02. In terms of profitability, BYLTF's ROE is +1.61%, compared to VTKLY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, BYLTF is less volatile compared to VTKLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYLTF.
BYLTF vs HMNKF Comparison
BYLTF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYLTF stands at 30.84M. In comparison, HMNKF has a market cap of 1.84B. Regarding current trading prices, BYLTF is priced at $0.20, while HMNKF trades at $36.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.09, whereas HMNKF's P/E ratio is 55.53. In terms of profitability, BYLTF's ROE is +1.61%, compared to HMNKF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BYLTF and HMNKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BYLTF vs VTKLF Comparison
BYLTF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYLTF stands at 30.84M. In comparison, VTKLF has a market cap of 1.47B. Regarding current trading prices, BYLTF is priced at $0.20, while VTKLF trades at $5.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.09, whereas VTKLF's P/E ratio is 9.08. In terms of profitability, BYLTF's ROE is +1.61%, compared to VTKLF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, BYLTF is less volatile compared to VTKLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYLTF.
BYLTF vs ADVOF Comparison
BYLTF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYLTF stands at 30.84M. In comparison, ADVOF has a market cap of 1.09B. Regarding current trading prices, BYLTF is priced at $0.20, while ADVOF trades at $20.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.09, whereas ADVOF's P/E ratio is -40.88. In terms of profitability, BYLTF's ROE is +1.61%, compared to ADVOF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BYLTF is less volatile compared to ADVOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYLTF.
BYLTF vs EUTLF Comparison
BYLTF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYLTF stands at 30.84M. In comparison, EUTLF has a market cap of 1.07B. Regarding current trading prices, BYLTF is priced at $0.20, while EUTLF trades at $2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.09, whereas EUTLF's P/E ratio is -0.97. In terms of profitability, BYLTF's ROE is +1.61%, compared to EUTLF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BYLTF is less volatile compared to EUTLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYLTF.
BYLTF vs HTCKF Comparison
BYLTF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYLTF stands at 30.84M. In comparison, HTCKF has a market cap of 1.06B. Regarding current trading prices, BYLTF is priced at $0.20, while HTCKF trades at $6.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.09, whereas HTCKF's P/E ratio is -14.13. In terms of profitability, BYLTF's ROE is +1.61%, compared to HTCKF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BYLTF and HTCKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BYLTF vs UBLXF Comparison
BYLTF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYLTF stands at 30.84M. In comparison, UBLXF has a market cap of 793.27M. Regarding current trading prices, BYLTF is priced at $0.20, while UBLXF trades at $105.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.09, whereas UBLXF's P/E ratio is -7.31. In terms of profitability, BYLTF's ROE is +1.61%, compared to UBLXF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BYLTF and UBLXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BYLTF vs FXCNY Comparison
BYLTF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYLTF stands at 30.84M. In comparison, FXCNY has a market cap of 764.80M. Regarding current trading prices, BYLTF is priced at $0.20, while FXCNY trades at $1.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.09, whereas FXCNY's P/E ratio is -38.80. In terms of profitability, BYLTF's ROE is +1.61%, compared to FXCNY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BYLTF and FXCNY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BYLTF vs COBJF Comparison
BYLTF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYLTF stands at 30.84M. In comparison, COBJF has a market cap of 702.71M. Regarding current trading prices, BYLTF is priced at $0.20, while COBJF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.09, whereas COBJF's P/E ratio is -7.59. In terms of profitability, BYLTF's ROE is +1.61%, compared to COBJF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BYLTF is less volatile compared to COBJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYLTF.
BYLTF vs EVTZF Comparison
BYLTF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYLTF stands at 30.84M. In comparison, EVTZF has a market cap of 641.36M. Regarding current trading prices, BYLTF is priced at $0.20, while EVTZF trades at $8.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.09, whereas EVTZF's P/E ratio is 15.09. In terms of profitability, BYLTF's ROE is +1.61%, compared to EVTZF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BYLTF and EVTZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BYLTF vs FXCNF Comparison
BYLTF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYLTF stands at 30.84M. In comparison, FXCNF has a market cap of 630.76M. Regarding current trading prices, BYLTF is priced at $0.20, while FXCNF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.09, whereas FXCNF's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, BYLTF's ROE is +1.61%, compared to FXCNF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BYLTF is less volatile compared to FXCNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYLTF.
BYLTF vs OKIEF Comparison
BYLTF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYLTF stands at 30.84M. In comparison, OKIEF has a market cap of 577.92M. Regarding current trading prices, BYLTF is priced at $0.20, while OKIEF trades at $6.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.09, whereas OKIEF's P/E ratio is 3.24. In terms of profitability, BYLTF's ROE is +1.61%, compared to OKIEF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BYLTF is less volatile compared to OKIEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYLTF.
BYLTF vs EVSBY Comparison
BYLTF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYLTF stands at 30.84M. In comparison, EVSBY has a market cap of 565.97M. Regarding current trading prices, BYLTF is priced at $0.20, while EVSBY trades at $9.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.09, whereas EVSBY's P/E ratio is 11.47. In terms of profitability, BYLTF's ROE is +1.61%, compared to EVSBY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BYLTF is less volatile compared to EVSBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYLTF.
BYLTF vs OKIEY Comparison
BYLTF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYLTF stands at 30.84M. In comparison, OKIEY has a market cap of 528.93M. Regarding current trading prices, BYLTF is priced at $0.20, while OKIEY trades at $6.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.09, whereas OKIEY's P/E ratio is 2.96. In terms of profitability, BYLTF's ROE is +1.61%, compared to OKIEY's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, BYLTF is less volatile compared to OKIEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYLTF.
BYLTF vs SATOF Comparison
BYLTF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYLTF stands at 30.84M. In comparison, SATOF has a market cap of 465.20M. Regarding current trading prices, BYLTF is priced at $0.20, while SATOF trades at $14.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.09, whereas SATOF's P/E ratio is 10.61. In terms of profitability, BYLTF's ROE is +1.61%, compared to SATOF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BYLTF and SATOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BYLTF vs FLTCF Comparison
BYLTF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYLTF stands at 30.84M. In comparison, FLTCF has a market cap of 325.22M. Regarding current trading prices, BYLTF is priced at $0.20, while FLTCF trades at $1.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.09, whereas FLTCF's P/E ratio is 24.75. In terms of profitability, BYLTF's ROE is +1.61%, compared to FLTCF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, BYLTF is less volatile compared to FLTCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYLTF.
BYLTF vs PAOTF Comparison
BYLTF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYLTF stands at 30.84M. In comparison, PAOTF has a market cap of 235.50M. Regarding current trading prices, BYLTF is priced at $0.20, while PAOTF trades at $7.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.09, whereas PAOTF's P/E ratio is -10.51. In terms of profitability, BYLTF's ROE is +1.61%, compared to PAOTF's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, BYLTF is less volatile compared to PAOTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYLTF.
BYLTF vs VNWTF Comparison
BYLTF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYLTF stands at 30.84M. In comparison, VNWTF has a market cap of 179.93M. Regarding current trading prices, BYLTF is priced at $0.20, while VNWTF trades at $7.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.09, whereas VNWTF's P/E ratio is 29.60. In terms of profitability, BYLTF's ROE is +1.61%, compared to VNWTF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BYLTF and VNWTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BYLTF vs QTRHF Comparison
BYLTF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYLTF stands at 30.84M. In comparison, QTRHF has a market cap of 133.62M. Regarding current trading prices, BYLTF is priced at $0.20, while QTRHF trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.09, whereas QTRHF's P/E ratio is -11.54. In terms of profitability, BYLTF's ROE is +1.61%, compared to QTRHF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BYLTF is less volatile compared to QTRHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYLTF.
BYLTF vs ATSKF Comparison
BYLTF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYLTF stands at 30.84M. In comparison, ATSKF has a market cap of 93.69M. Regarding current trading prices, BYLTF is priced at $0.20, while ATSKF trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.09, whereas ATSKF's P/E ratio is 7.30. In terms of profitability, BYLTF's ROE is +1.61%, compared to ATSKF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BYLTF is less volatile compared to ATSKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYLTF.
BYLTF vs NPNZF Comparison
BYLTF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYLTF stands at 30.84M. In comparison, NPNZF has a market cap of 91.75M. Regarding current trading prices, BYLTF is priced at $0.20, while NPNZF trades at $8.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.09, whereas NPNZF's P/E ratio is -11.23. In terms of profitability, BYLTF's ROE is +1.61%, compared to NPNZF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BYLTF and NPNZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BYLTF vs ELSLF Comparison
BYLTF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYLTF stands at 30.84M. In comparison, ELSLF has a market cap of 48.10M. Regarding current trading prices, BYLTF is priced at $0.20, while ELSLF trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.09, whereas ELSLF's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, BYLTF's ROE is +1.61%, compared to ELSLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BYLTF and ELSLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BYLTF vs SIMTF Comparison
BYLTF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYLTF stands at 30.84M. In comparison, SIMTF has a market cap of 45.01M. Regarding current trading prices, BYLTF is priced at $0.20, while SIMTF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.09, whereas SIMTF's P/E ratio is 1.05. In terms of profitability, BYLTF's ROE is +1.61%, compared to SIMTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BYLTF is less volatile compared to SIMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYLTF.
BYLTF vs BEWFF Comparison
BYLTF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYLTF stands at 30.84M. In comparison, BEWFF has a market cap of 43.60M. Regarding current trading prices, BYLTF is priced at $0.20, while BEWFF trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.09, whereas BEWFF's P/E ratio is 49.27. In terms of profitability, BYLTF's ROE is +1.61%, compared to BEWFF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BYLTF and BEWFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BYLTF vs ASROF Comparison
BYLTF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYLTF stands at 30.84M. In comparison, ASROF has a market cap of 36.30M. Regarding current trading prices, BYLTF is priced at $0.20, while ASROF trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.09, whereas ASROF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BYLTF's ROE is +1.61%, compared to ASROF's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, BYLTF and ASROF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BYLTF vs CYSNF Comparison
BYLTF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYLTF stands at 30.84M. In comparison, CYSNF has a market cap of 30.00M. Regarding current trading prices, BYLTF is priced at $0.20, while CYSNF trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.09, whereas CYSNF's P/E ratio is -71.00. In terms of profitability, BYLTF's ROE is +1.61%, compared to CYSNF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BYLTF and CYSNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BYLTF vs WSTL Comparison
BYLTF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYLTF stands at 30.84M. In comparison, WSTL has a market cap of 23.24M. Regarding current trading prices, BYLTF is priced at $0.20, while WSTL trades at $2.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.09, whereas WSTL's P/E ratio is -9.50. In terms of profitability, BYLTF's ROE is +1.61%, compared to WSTL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BYLTF is less volatile compared to WSTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYLTF.
BYLTF vs MILOF Comparison
BYLTF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYLTF stands at 30.84M. In comparison, MILOF has a market cap of 12.84M. Regarding current trading prices, BYLTF is priced at $0.20, while MILOF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.09, whereas MILOF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, BYLTF's ROE is +1.61%, compared to MILOF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BYLTF and MILOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BYLTF vs KPIFF Comparison
BYLTF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYLTF stands at 30.84M. In comparison, KPIFF has a market cap of 9.16M. Regarding current trading prices, BYLTF is priced at $0.20, while KPIFF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.09, whereas KPIFF's P/E ratio is -3.85. In terms of profitability, BYLTF's ROE is +1.61%, compared to KPIFF's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, BYLTF is less volatile compared to KPIFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYLTF.
BYLTF vs ATGN Comparison
BYLTF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYLTF stands at 30.84M. In comparison, ATGN has a market cap of 8.85M. Regarding current trading prices, BYLTF is priced at $0.20, while ATGN trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.09, whereas ATGN's P/E ratio is -3.78. In terms of profitability, BYLTF's ROE is +1.61%, compared to ATGN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BYLTF is less volatile compared to ATGN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYLTF.
BYLTF vs ENAFF Comparison
BYLTF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYLTF stands at 30.84M. In comparison, ENAFF has a market cap of 7.67M. Regarding current trading prices, BYLTF is priced at $0.20, while ENAFF trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.09, whereas ENAFF's P/E ratio is -0.66. In terms of profitability, BYLTF's ROE is +1.61%, compared to ENAFF's ROE of +0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, BYLTF is less volatile compared to ENAFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYLTF.
BYLTF vs CYCA Comparison
BYLTF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYLTF stands at 30.84M. In comparison, CYCA has a market cap of 7.66M. Regarding current trading prices, BYLTF is priced at $0.20, while CYCA trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.09, whereas CYCA's P/E ratio is -1.63. In terms of profitability, BYLTF's ROE is +1.61%, compared to CYCA's ROE of +5.72%. Regarding short-term risk, BYLTF is less volatile compared to CYCA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYLTF.
BYLTF vs VMNT Comparison
BYLTF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYLTF stands at 30.84M. In comparison, VMNT has a market cap of 6.24M. Regarding current trading prices, BYLTF is priced at $0.20, while VMNT trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.09, whereas VMNT's P/E ratio is -4.25. In terms of profitability, BYLTF's ROE is +1.61%, compared to VMNT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BYLTF is less volatile compared to VMNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYLTF.
BYLTF vs LTCCF Comparison
BYLTF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYLTF stands at 30.84M. In comparison, LTCCF has a market cap of 6.17M. Regarding current trading prices, BYLTF is priced at $0.20, while LTCCF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.09, whereas LTCCF's P/E ratio is -2.96. In terms of profitability, BYLTF's ROE is +1.61%, compared to LTCCF's ROE of +8.51%. Regarding short-term risk, BYLTF and LTCCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BYLTF vs MOYFF Comparison
BYLTF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYLTF stands at 30.84M. In comparison, MOYFF has a market cap of 5.07M. Regarding current trading prices, BYLTF is priced at $0.20, while MOYFF trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.09, whereas MOYFF's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, BYLTF's ROE is +1.61%, compared to MOYFF's ROE of +8.70%. Regarding short-term risk, BYLTF is less volatile compared to MOYFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYLTF.
BYLTF vs ISEYF Comparison
BYLTF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYLTF stands at 30.84M. In comparison, ISEYF has a market cap of 4.36M. Regarding current trading prices, BYLTF is priced at $0.20, while ISEYF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.09, whereas ISEYF's P/E ratio is -2.64. In terms of profitability, BYLTF's ROE is +1.61%, compared to ISEYF's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, BYLTF is less volatile compared to ISEYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYLTF.
BYLTF vs HPNN Comparison
BYLTF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYLTF stands at 30.84M. In comparison, HPNN has a market cap of 3.72M. Regarding current trading prices, BYLTF is priced at $0.20, while HPNN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.09, whereas HPNN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BYLTF's ROE is +1.61%, compared to HPNN's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BYLTF is less volatile compared to HPNN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYLTF.
BYLTF vs STRH Comparison
BYLTF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYLTF stands at 30.84M. In comparison, STRH has a market cap of 3.53M. Regarding current trading prices, BYLTF is priced at $0.20, while STRH trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.09, whereas STRH's P/E ratio is -6.60. In terms of profitability, BYLTF's ROE is +1.61%, compared to STRH's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BYLTF and STRH have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BYLTF vs TTLTF Comparison
BYLTF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYLTF stands at 30.84M. In comparison, TTLTF has a market cap of 3.21M. Regarding current trading prices, BYLTF is priced at $0.20, while TTLTF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.09, whereas TTLTF's P/E ratio is 12.15. In terms of profitability, BYLTF's ROE is +1.61%, compared to TTLTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BYLTF is less volatile compared to TTLTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYLTF.
BYLTF vs WLAN Comparison
BYLTF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYLTF stands at 30.84M. In comparison, WLAN has a market cap of 2.53M. Regarding current trading prices, BYLTF is priced at $0.20, while WLAN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.09, whereas WLAN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BYLTF's ROE is +1.61%, compared to WLAN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BYLTF is less volatile compared to WLAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYLTF.
BYLTF vs NRRWF Comparison
BYLTF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYLTF stands at 30.84M. In comparison, NRRWF has a market cap of 1.92M. Regarding current trading prices, BYLTF is priced at $0.20, while NRRWF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.09, whereas NRRWF's P/E ratio is -0.38. In terms of profitability, BYLTF's ROE is +1.61%, compared to NRRWF's ROE of -8.90%. Regarding short-term risk, BYLTF is less volatile compared to NRRWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYLTF.
BYLTF vs NVRVF Comparison
BYLTF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYLTF stands at 30.84M. In comparison, NVRVF has a market cap of 1.54M. Regarding current trading prices, BYLTF is priced at $0.20, while NVRVF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.09, whereas NVRVF's P/E ratio is -2.30. In terms of profitability, BYLTF's ROE is +1.61%, compared to NVRVF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, BYLTF and NVRVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BYLTF vs TPTW Comparison
BYLTF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYLTF stands at 30.84M. In comparison, TPTW has a market cap of 1.47M. Regarding current trading prices, BYLTF is priced at $0.20, while TPTW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.09, whereas TPTW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, BYLTF's ROE is +1.61%, compared to TPTW's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BYLTF is less volatile compared to TPTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYLTF.
BYLTF vs LMGR Comparison
BYLTF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYLTF stands at 30.84M. In comparison, LMGR has a market cap of 1.47M. Regarding current trading prices, BYLTF is priced at $0.20, while LMGR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.09, whereas LMGR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BYLTF's ROE is +1.61%, compared to LMGR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BYLTF is less volatile compared to LMGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYLTF.
BYLTF vs CNTFY Comparison
BYLTF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYLTF stands at 30.84M. In comparison, CNTFY has a market cap of 1.27M. Regarding current trading prices, BYLTF is priced at $0.20, while CNTFY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.09, whereas CNTFY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BYLTF's ROE is +1.61%, compared to CNTFY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BYLTF and CNTFY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BYLTF vs MFCO Comparison
BYLTF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYLTF stands at 30.84M. In comparison, MFCO has a market cap of 928440.00. Regarding current trading prices, BYLTF is priced at $0.20, while MFCO trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.09, whereas MFCO's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, BYLTF's ROE is +1.61%, compared to MFCO's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, BYLTF and MFCO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BYLTF vs BDRL Comparison
BYLTF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYLTF stands at 30.84M. In comparison, BDRL has a market cap of 552119.00. Regarding current trading prices, BYLTF is priced at $0.20, while BDRL trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.09, whereas BDRL's P/E ratio is -1.03. In terms of profitability, BYLTF's ROE is +1.61%, compared to BDRL's ROE of +1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BYLTF is less volatile compared to BDRL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYLTF.
BYLTF vs ELST Comparison
BYLTF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYLTF stands at 30.84M. In comparison, ELST has a market cap of 494650.00. Regarding current trading prices, BYLTF is priced at $0.20, while ELST trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.09, whereas ELST's P/E ratio is -1.67. In terms of profitability, BYLTF's ROE is +1.61%, compared to ELST's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BYLTF is less volatile compared to ELST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYLTF.
BYLTF vs ATCLF Comparison
BYLTF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYLTF stands at 30.84M. In comparison, ATCLF has a market cap of 493528.00. Regarding current trading prices, BYLTF is priced at $0.20, while ATCLF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.09, whereas ATCLF's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, BYLTF's ROE is +1.61%, compared to ATCLF's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, BYLTF is less volatile compared to ATCLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYLTF.
BYLTF vs VCTY Comparison
BYLTF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYLTF stands at 30.84M. In comparison, VCTY has a market cap of 479580.00. Regarding current trading prices, BYLTF is priced at $0.20, while VCTY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.09, whereas VCTY's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, BYLTF's ROE is +1.61%, compared to VCTY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BYLTF is less volatile compared to VCTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYLTF.
BYLTF vs MLRT Comparison
BYLTF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYLTF stands at 30.84M. In comparison, MLRT has a market cap of 444989.00. Regarding current trading prices, BYLTF is priced at $0.20, while MLRT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.09, whereas MLRT's P/E ratio is -0.59. In terms of profitability, BYLTF's ROE is +1.61%, compared to MLRT's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BYLTF is less volatile compared to MLRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYLTF.
BYLTF vs CRMK Comparison
BYLTF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYLTF stands at 30.84M. In comparison, CRMK has a market cap of 441374.00. Regarding current trading prices, BYLTF is priced at $0.20, while CRMK trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.09, whereas CRMK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BYLTF's ROE is +1.61%, compared to CRMK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BYLTF is less volatile compared to CRMK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYLTF.
BYLTF vs AXBSF Comparison
BYLTF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYLTF stands at 30.84M. In comparison, AXBSF has a market cap of 425865.00. Regarding current trading prices, BYLTF is priced at $0.20, while AXBSF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.09, whereas AXBSF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, BYLTF's ROE is +1.61%, compared to AXBSF's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, BYLTF is less volatile compared to AXBSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYLTF.
BYLTF vs BKSD Comparison
BYLTF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYLTF stands at 30.84M. In comparison, BKSD has a market cap of 273869.00. Regarding current trading prices, BYLTF is priced at $0.20, while BKSD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.09, whereas BKSD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BYLTF's ROE is +1.61%, compared to BKSD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BYLTF and BKSD have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BYLTF vs WGNR Comparison
BYLTF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYLTF stands at 30.84M. In comparison, WGNR has a market cap of 241609.00. Regarding current trading prices, BYLTF is priced at $0.20, while WGNR trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.09, whereas WGNR's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, BYLTF's ROE is +1.61%, compared to WGNR's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BYLTF and WGNR have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BYLTF vs AAPJ Comparison
BYLTF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYLTF stands at 30.84M. In comparison, AAPJ has a market cap of 177988.00. Regarding current trading prices, BYLTF is priced at $0.20, while AAPJ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.09, whereas AAPJ's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, BYLTF's ROE is +1.61%, compared to AAPJ's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BYLTF is less volatile compared to AAPJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYLTF.
BYLTF vs CAMPQ Comparison
BYLTF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYLTF stands at 30.84M. In comparison, CAMPQ has a market cap of 120572.00. Regarding current trading prices, BYLTF is priced at $0.20, while CAMPQ trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.09, whereas CAMPQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, BYLTF's ROE is +1.61%, compared to CAMPQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BYLTF is less volatile compared to CAMPQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYLTF.
BYLTF vs ERFB Comparison
BYLTF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYLTF stands at 30.84M. In comparison, ERFB has a market cap of 84128.00. Regarding current trading prices, BYLTF is priced at $0.20, while ERFB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.09, whereas ERFB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BYLTF's ROE is +1.61%, compared to ERFB's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BYLTF and ERFB have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BYLTF vs PDXP Comparison
BYLTF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYLTF stands at 30.84M. In comparison, PDXP has a market cap of 81715.00. Regarding current trading prices, BYLTF is priced at $0.20, while PDXP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.09, whereas PDXP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BYLTF's ROE is +1.61%, compared to PDXP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BYLTF is less volatile compared to PDXP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYLTF.
BYLTF vs EZEN Comparison
BYLTF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYLTF stands at 30.84M. In comparison, EZEN has a market cap of 72600.00. Regarding current trading prices, BYLTF is priced at $0.20, while EZEN trades at $3,300.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.09, whereas EZEN's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, BYLTF's ROE is +1.61%, compared to EZEN's ROE of -1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. BYLTF has daily volatility of 0.00 and EZEN has daily volatility of N/A.
BYLTF vs PMOZ Comparison
BYLTF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYLTF stands at 30.84M. In comparison, PMOZ has a market cap of 68195.00. Regarding current trading prices, BYLTF is priced at $0.20, while PMOZ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.09, whereas PMOZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BYLTF's ROE is +1.61%, compared to PMOZ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BYLTF and PMOZ have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BYLTF vs CRLI Comparison
BYLTF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYLTF stands at 30.84M. In comparison, CRLI has a market cap of 60539.00. Regarding current trading prices, BYLTF is priced at $0.20, while CRLI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.09, whereas CRLI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BYLTF's ROE is +1.61%, compared to CRLI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BYLTF and CRLI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BYLTF vs ETCIA Comparison
BYLTF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYLTF stands at 30.84M. In comparison, ETCIA has a market cap of 55198.00. Regarding current trading prices, BYLTF is priced at $0.20, while ETCIA trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.09, whereas ETCIA's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, BYLTF's ROE is +1.61%, compared to ETCIA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BYLTF and ETCIA have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BYLTF vs IPTK Comparison
BYLTF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYLTF stands at 30.84M. In comparison, IPTK has a market cap of 28651.00. Regarding current trading prices, BYLTF is priced at $0.20, while IPTK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.09, whereas IPTK's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, BYLTF's ROE is +1.61%, compared to IPTK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BYLTF is less volatile compared to IPTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYLTF.
BYLTF vs FBCE Comparison
BYLTF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYLTF stands at 30.84M. In comparison, FBCE has a market cap of 9988.00. Regarding current trading prices, BYLTF is priced at $0.20, while FBCE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.09, whereas FBCE's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, BYLTF's ROE is +1.61%, compared to FBCE's ROE of -1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, BYLTF is less volatile compared to FBCE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYLTF.
BYLTF vs OTOW Comparison
BYLTF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYLTF stands at 30.84M. In comparison, OTOW has a market cap of 8778.00. Regarding current trading prices, BYLTF is priced at $0.20, while OTOW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.09, whereas OTOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BYLTF's ROE is +1.61%, compared to OTOW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BYLTF and OTOW have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BYLTF vs UTRK Comparison
BYLTF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYLTF stands at 30.84M. In comparison, UTRK has a market cap of 5912.00. Regarding current trading prices, BYLTF is priced at $0.20, while UTRK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.09, whereas UTRK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BYLTF's ROE is +1.61%, compared to UTRK's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, BYLTF is less volatile compared to UTRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYLTF.
BYLTF vs LTTC Comparison
BYLTF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYLTF stands at 30.84M. In comparison, LTTC has a market cap of 4788.00. Regarding current trading prices, BYLTF is priced at $0.20, while LTTC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.09, whereas LTTC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BYLTF's ROE is +1.61%, compared to LTTC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BYLTF is less volatile compared to LTTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYLTF.
BYLTF vs JUMT Comparison
BYLTF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYLTF stands at 30.84M. In comparison, JUMT has a market cap of 4647.00. Regarding current trading prices, BYLTF is priced at $0.20, while JUMT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.09, whereas JUMT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BYLTF's ROE is +1.61%, compared to JUMT's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, BYLTF is less volatile compared to JUMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYLTF.
BYLTF vs AVSR Comparison
BYLTF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYLTF stands at 30.84M. In comparison, AVSR has a market cap of 4086.00. Regarding current trading prices, BYLTF is priced at $0.20, while AVSR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.09, whereas AVSR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BYLTF's ROE is +1.61%, compared to AVSR's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, BYLTF and AVSR have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BYLTF vs MPEG Comparison
BYLTF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYLTF stands at 30.84M. In comparison, MPEG has a market cap of 3799.00. Regarding current trading prices, BYLTF is priced at $0.20, while MPEG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.09, whereas MPEG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BYLTF's ROE is +1.61%, compared to MPEG's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, BYLTF is less volatile compared to MPEG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYLTF.
BYLTF vs WIRX Comparison
BYLTF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYLTF stands at 30.84M. In comparison, WIRX has a market cap of 3500.00. Regarding current trading prices, BYLTF is priced at $0.20, while WIRX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.09, whereas WIRX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BYLTF's ROE is +1.61%, compared to WIRX's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BYLTF is less volatile compared to WIRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYLTF.
BYLTF vs CYBD Comparison
BYLTF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYLTF stands at 30.84M. In comparison, CYBD has a market cap of 3353.00. Regarding current trading prices, BYLTF is priced at $0.20, while CYBD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.09, whereas CYBD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BYLTF's ROE is +1.61%, compared to CYBD's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, BYLTF and CYBD have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BYLTF vs VRCM Comparison
BYLTF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYLTF stands at 30.84M. In comparison, VRCM has a market cap of 2980.00. Regarding current trading prices, BYLTF is priced at $0.20, while VRCM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.09, whereas VRCM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BYLTF's ROE is +1.61%, compared to VRCM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BYLTF is less volatile compared to VRCM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYLTF.
BYLTF vs IZNN Comparison
BYLTF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYLTF stands at 30.84M. In comparison, IZNN has a market cap of 2468.00. Regarding current trading prices, BYLTF is priced at $0.20, while IZNN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.09, whereas IZNN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BYLTF's ROE is +1.61%, compared to IZNN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BYLTF is less volatile compared to IZNN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYLTF.
BYLTF vs PRXM Comparison
BYLTF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYLTF stands at 30.84M. In comparison, PRXM has a market cap of 2386.00. Regarding current trading prices, BYLTF is priced at $0.20, while PRXM trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.09, whereas PRXM's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, BYLTF's ROE is +1.61%, compared to PRXM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BYLTF and PRXM have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BYLTF vs RPDT Comparison
BYLTF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYLTF stands at 30.84M. In comparison, RPDT has a market cap of 2170.00. Regarding current trading prices, BYLTF is priced at $0.20, while RPDT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.09, whereas RPDT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BYLTF's ROE is +1.61%, compared to RPDT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BYLTF is less volatile compared to RPDT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYLTF.
BYLTF vs XCOMQ Comparison
BYLTF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYLTF stands at 30.84M. In comparison, XCOMQ has a market cap of 1722.00. Regarding current trading prices, BYLTF is priced at $0.20, while XCOMQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.09, whereas XCOMQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BYLTF's ROE is +1.61%, compared to XCOMQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BYLTF is less volatile compared to XCOMQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYLTF.
BYLTF vs RITT Comparison
BYLTF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYLTF stands at 30.84M. In comparison, RITT has a market cap of 1554.00. Regarding current trading prices, BYLTF is priced at $0.20, while RITT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.09, whereas RITT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BYLTF's ROE is +1.61%, compared to RITT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BYLTF is less volatile compared to RITT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYLTF.
BYLTF vs ZSTN Comparison
BYLTF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYLTF stands at 30.84M. In comparison, ZSTN has a market cap of 1160.00. Regarding current trading prices, BYLTF is priced at $0.20, while ZSTN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.09, whereas ZSTN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BYLTF's ROE is +1.61%, compared to ZSTN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BYLTF is less volatile compared to ZSTN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYLTF.
BYLTF vs ABILF Comparison
BYLTF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYLTF stands at 30.84M. In comparison, ABILF has a market cap of 799.00. Regarding current trading prices, BYLTF is priced at $0.20, while ABILF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.09, whereas ABILF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BYLTF's ROE is +1.61%, compared to ABILF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BYLTF and ABILF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BYLTF vs GNRD Comparison
BYLTF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYLTF stands at 30.84M. In comparison, GNRD has a market cap of 353.00. Regarding current trading prices, BYLTF is priced at $0.20, while GNRD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.09, whereas GNRD's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, BYLTF's ROE is +1.61%, compared to GNRD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BYLTF and GNRD have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BYLTF vs ZTNO Comparison
BYLTF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYLTF stands at 30.84M. In comparison, ZTNO has a market cap of 301.00. Regarding current trading prices, BYLTF is priced at $0.20, while ZTNO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.09, whereas ZTNO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BYLTF's ROE is +1.61%, compared to ZTNO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BYLTF is less volatile compared to ZTNO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYLTF.
BYLTF vs ORSX Comparison
BYLTF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYLTF stands at 30.84M. In comparison, ORSX has a market cap of 300.00. Regarding current trading prices, BYLTF is priced at $0.20, while ORSX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.09, whereas ORSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BYLTF's ROE is +1.61%, compared to ORSX's ROE of -2.51%. Regarding short-term risk, BYLTF is less volatile compared to ORSX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYLTF.
BYLTF vs TCCO Comparison
BYLTF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYLTF stands at 30.84M. In comparison, TCCO has a market cap of 185.00. Regarding current trading prices, BYLTF is priced at $0.20, while TCCO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.09, whereas TCCO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BYLTF's ROE is +1.61%, compared to TCCO's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, BYLTF and TCCO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BYLTF vs HDIH Comparison
BYLTF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYLTF stands at 30.84M. In comparison, HDIH has a market cap of 45.00. Regarding current trading prices, BYLTF is priced at $0.20, while HDIH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.09, whereas HDIH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BYLTF's ROE is +1.61%, compared to HDIH's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BYLTF and HDIH have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BYLTF vs LMSC Comparison
BYLTF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYLTF stands at 30.84M. In comparison, LMSC has a market cap of 31.00. Regarding current trading prices, BYLTF is priced at $0.20, while LMSC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.09, whereas LMSC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BYLTF's ROE is +1.61%, compared to LMSC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BYLTF and LMSC have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BYLTF vs STCI Comparison
BYLTF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYLTF stands at 30.84M. In comparison, STCI has a market cap of 20.00. Regarding current trading prices, BYLTF is priced at $0.20, while STCI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.09, whereas STCI's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, BYLTF's ROE is +1.61%, compared to STCI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BYLTF and STCI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BYLTF vs BETW Comparison
BYLTF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYLTF stands at 30.84M. In comparison, BETW has a market cap of 3.00. Regarding current trading prices, BYLTF is priced at $0.20, while BETW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYLTF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.09, whereas BETW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BYLTF's ROE is +1.61%, compared to BETW's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BYLTF is less volatile compared to BETW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYLTF.