Bosideng International Holdings Limited
Bosideng International Holdings Limited BSDGY Peers
See (BSDGY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Apparel - Manufacturers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BSDGY | $27.13 | N/A | 6.21B | 13.43 | $2.02 | +6.15% |
| HNNMY | $2.98 | +2.41% | 123.32B | 21.29 | $0.14 | +0.39% |
| HMRZF | $12.14 | N/A | 19.55B | 17.34 | $0.70 | +5.36% |
| MONRY | $65.00 | +2.43% | 17.72B | 24.34 | $2.67 | +1.90% |
| MONRF | $61.43 | -1.09% | 16.62B | 23.01 | $2.67 | +2.03% |
| SZHIF | $7.65 | -16.30% | 11.50B | 15.61 | $0.49 | +3.90% |
| SHZHY | $7.60 | N/A | 11.42B | 19.00 | $0.40 | +4.02% |
| TRYIY | $13.11 | -0.46% | 10.40B | 29.13 | $0.45 | +0.54% |
| TRYIF | $5.55 | +20.65% | 8.80B | 25.23 | $0.22 | +2.20% |
| BSDGF | $0.51 | +1.54% | 5.82B | 12.69 | $0.04 | +6.57% |
Stock Comparison
BSDGY vs HNNMY Comparison
BSDGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSDGY stands at 6.21B. In comparison, HNNMY has a market cap of 123.32B. Regarding current trading prices, BSDGY is priced at $27.13, while HNNMY trades at $2.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSDGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas HNNMY's P/E ratio is 21.29. In terms of profitability, BSDGY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to HNNMY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, BSDGY is more volatile compared to HNNMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSDGY.
BSDGY vs HMRZF Comparison
BSDGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSDGY stands at 6.21B. In comparison, HMRZF has a market cap of 19.55B. Regarding current trading prices, BSDGY is priced at $27.13, while HMRZF trades at $12.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSDGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas HMRZF's P/E ratio is 17.34. In terms of profitability, BSDGY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to HMRZF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, BSDGY is more volatile compared to HMRZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSDGY.
BSDGY vs MONRY Comparison
BSDGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSDGY stands at 6.21B. In comparison, MONRY has a market cap of 17.72B. Regarding current trading prices, BSDGY is priced at $27.13, while MONRY trades at $65.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSDGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas MONRY's P/E ratio is 24.34. In terms of profitability, BSDGY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MONRY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BSDGY is more volatile compared to MONRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSDGY.
BSDGY vs MONRF Comparison
BSDGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSDGY stands at 6.21B. In comparison, MONRF has a market cap of 16.62B. Regarding current trading prices, BSDGY is priced at $27.13, while MONRF trades at $61.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSDGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas MONRF's P/E ratio is 23.01. In terms of profitability, BSDGY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MONRF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BSDGY is more volatile compared to MONRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSDGY.
BSDGY vs SZHIF Comparison
BSDGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSDGY stands at 6.21B. In comparison, SZHIF has a market cap of 11.50B. Regarding current trading prices, BSDGY is priced at $27.13, while SZHIF trades at $7.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSDGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas SZHIF's P/E ratio is 15.61. In terms of profitability, BSDGY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SZHIF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BSDGY is more volatile compared to SZHIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSDGY.
BSDGY vs SHZHY Comparison
BSDGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSDGY stands at 6.21B. In comparison, SHZHY has a market cap of 11.42B. Regarding current trading prices, BSDGY is priced at $27.13, while SHZHY trades at $7.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSDGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas SHZHY's P/E ratio is 19.00. In terms of profitability, BSDGY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SHZHY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BSDGY is more volatile compared to SHZHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSDGY.
BSDGY vs TRYIY Comparison
BSDGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSDGY stands at 6.21B. In comparison, TRYIY has a market cap of 10.40B. Regarding current trading prices, BSDGY is priced at $27.13, while TRYIY trades at $13.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSDGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas TRYIY's P/E ratio is 29.13. In terms of profitability, BSDGY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TRYIY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BSDGY is more volatile compared to TRYIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSDGY.
BSDGY vs TRYIF Comparison
BSDGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSDGY stands at 6.21B. In comparison, TRYIF has a market cap of 8.80B. Regarding current trading prices, BSDGY is priced at $27.13, while TRYIF trades at $5.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSDGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas TRYIF's P/E ratio is 25.23. In terms of profitability, BSDGY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TRYIF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BSDGY is less volatile compared to TRYIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSDGY.
BSDGY vs BSDGF Comparison
BSDGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSDGY stands at 6.21B. In comparison, BSDGF has a market cap of 5.82B. Regarding current trading prices, BSDGY is priced at $27.13, while BSDGF trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSDGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas BSDGF's P/E ratio is 12.69. In terms of profitability, BSDGY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BSDGF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BSDGY is more volatile compared to BSDGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSDGY.
BSDGY vs RYPPF Comparison
BSDGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSDGY stands at 6.21B. In comparison, RYPPF has a market cap of 4.89B. Regarding current trading prices, BSDGY is priced at $27.13, while RYPPF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSDGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas RYPPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BSDGY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to RYPPF's ROE of +1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, BSDGY is less volatile compared to RYPPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSDGY.
BSDGY vs BOSSY Comparison
BSDGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSDGY stands at 6.21B. In comparison, BOSSY has a market cap of 3.24B. Regarding current trading prices, BSDGY is priced at $27.13, while BOSSY trades at $9.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSDGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas BOSSY's P/E ratio is 13.40. In terms of profitability, BSDGY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BOSSY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BSDGY is more volatile compared to BOSSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSDGY.
BSDGY vs WACLY Comparison
BSDGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSDGY stands at 6.21B. In comparison, WACLY has a market cap of 1.80B. Regarding current trading prices, BSDGY is priced at $27.13, while WACLY trades at $169.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSDGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas WACLY's P/E ratio is 58.86. In terms of profitability, BSDGY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to WACLY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BSDGY is less volatile compared to WACLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSDGY.
BSDGY vs CGGGF Comparison
BSDGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSDGY stands at 6.21B. In comparison, CGGGF has a market cap of 1.58B. Regarding current trading prices, BSDGY is priced at $27.13, while CGGGF trades at $0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSDGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas CGGGF's P/E ratio is 19.87. In terms of profitability, BSDGY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CGGGF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BSDGY is less volatile compared to CGGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSDGY.
BSDGY vs DELTF Comparison
BSDGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSDGY stands at 6.21B. In comparison, DELTF has a market cap of 1.33B. Regarding current trading prices, BSDGY is priced at $27.13, while DELTF trades at $51.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSDGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas DELTF's P/E ratio is 15.50. In terms of profitability, BSDGY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to DELTF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BSDGY is more volatile compared to DELTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSDGY.
BSDGY vs JNBYF Comparison
BSDGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSDGY stands at 6.21B. In comparison, JNBYF has a market cap of 1.11B. Regarding current trading prices, BSDGY is priced at $27.13, while JNBYF trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSDGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas JNBYF's P/E ratio is 9.39. In terms of profitability, BSDGY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to JNBYF's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, BSDGY is less volatile compared to JNBYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSDGY.
BSDGY vs SERNF Comparison
BSDGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSDGY stands at 6.21B. In comparison, SERNF has a market cap of 1.04B. Regarding current trading prices, BSDGY is priced at $27.13, while SERNF trades at $17.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSDGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas SERNF's P/E ratio is 10.41. In terms of profitability, BSDGY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SERNF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BSDGY is less volatile compared to SERNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSDGY.
BSDGY vs WACLF Comparison
BSDGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSDGY stands at 6.21B. In comparison, WACLF has a market cap of 791.53M. Regarding current trading prices, BSDGY is priced at $27.13, while WACLF trades at $15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSDGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas WACLF's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, BSDGY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to WACLF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BSDGY is less volatile compared to WACLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSDGY.
BSDGY vs MKKOF Comparison
BSDGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSDGY stands at 6.21B. In comparison, MKKOF has a market cap of 525.81M. Regarding current trading prices, BSDGY is priced at $27.13, while MKKOF trades at $12.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSDGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas MKKOF's P/E ratio is 19.06. In terms of profitability, BSDGY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MKKOF's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, BSDGY is more volatile compared to MKKOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSDGY.
BSDGY vs JWTXF Comparison
BSDGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSDGY stands at 6.21B. In comparison, JWTXF has a market cap of 517.20M. Regarding current trading prices, BSDGY is priced at $27.13, while JWTXF trades at $7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSDGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas JWTXF's P/E ratio is 0.11. In terms of profitability, BSDGY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to JWTXF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BSDGY is more volatile compared to JWTXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSDGY.
BSDGY vs TSIHF Comparison
BSDGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSDGY stands at 6.21B. In comparison, TSIHF has a market cap of 472.97M. Regarding current trading prices, BSDGY is priced at $27.13, while TSIHF trades at $7.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSDGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas TSIHF's P/E ratio is 4.86. In terms of profitability, BSDGY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TSIHF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BSDGY is less volatile compared to TSIHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSDGY.
BSDGY vs VDEVF Comparison
BSDGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSDGY stands at 6.21B. In comparison, VDEVF has a market cap of 441.54M. Regarding current trading prices, BSDGY is priced at $27.13, while VDEVF trades at $35.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSDGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas VDEVF's P/E ratio is 12.65. In terms of profitability, BSDGY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to VDEVF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BSDGY is more volatile compared to VDEVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSDGY.
BSDGY vs CDGXF Comparison
BSDGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSDGY stands at 6.21B. In comparison, CDGXF has a market cap of 351.87M. Regarding current trading prices, BSDGY is priced at $27.13, while CDGXF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSDGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas CDGXF's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, BSDGY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CDGXF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BSDGY is more volatile compared to CDGXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSDGY.
BSDGY vs CDGXY Comparison
BSDGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSDGY stands at 6.21B. In comparison, CDGXY has a market cap of 235.75M. Regarding current trading prices, BSDGY is priced at $27.13, while CDGXY trades at $2.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSDGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas CDGXY's P/E ratio is -18.27. In terms of profitability, BSDGY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CDGXY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BSDGY is less volatile compared to CDGXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSDGY.
BSDGY vs WQTEF Comparison
BSDGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSDGY stands at 6.21B. In comparison, WQTEF has a market cap of 167.21M. Regarding current trading prices, BSDGY is priced at $27.13, while WQTEF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSDGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas WQTEF's P/E ratio is -0.88. In terms of profitability, BSDGY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to WQTEF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BSDGY is less volatile compared to WQTEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSDGY.
BSDGY vs ECNLF Comparison
BSDGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSDGY stands at 6.21B. In comparison, ECNLF has a market cap of 112.14M. Regarding current trading prices, BSDGY is priced at $27.13, while ECNLF trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSDGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas ECNLF's P/E ratio is -6.19. In terms of profitability, BSDGY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ECNLF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BSDGY is more volatile compared to ECNLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSDGY.
BSDGY vs TFRFF Comparison
BSDGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSDGY stands at 6.21B. In comparison, TFRFF has a market cap of 95.27M. Regarding current trading prices, BSDGY is priced at $27.13, while TFRFF trades at $7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSDGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas TFRFF's P/E ratio is 6.30. In terms of profitability, BSDGY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TFRFF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BSDGY is more volatile compared to TFRFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSDGY.
BSDGY vs CHRLF Comparison
BSDGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSDGY stands at 6.21B. In comparison, CHRLF has a market cap of 84.09M. Regarding current trading prices, BSDGY is priced at $27.13, while CHRLF trades at $5.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSDGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas CHRLF's P/E ratio is 8.17. In terms of profitability, BSDGY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CHRLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BSDGY is more volatile compared to CHRLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSDGY.
BSDGY vs NLLGF Comparison
BSDGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSDGY stands at 6.21B. In comparison, NLLGF has a market cap of 66.98M. Regarding current trading prices, BSDGY is priced at $27.13, while NLLGF trades at $5.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSDGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas NLLGF's P/E ratio is 5.54. In terms of profitability, BSDGY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NLLGF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BSDGY is more volatile compared to NLLGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSDGY.
BSDGY vs TAPCF Comparison
BSDGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSDGY stands at 6.21B. In comparison, TAPCF has a market cap of 42.44M. Regarding current trading prices, BSDGY is priced at $27.13, while TAPCF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSDGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas TAPCF's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, BSDGY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TAPCF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BSDGY is more volatile compared to TAPCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSDGY.
BSDGY vs LPPSY Comparison
BSDGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSDGY stands at 6.21B. In comparison, LPPSY has a market cap of 37.56M. Regarding current trading prices, BSDGY is priced at $27.13, while LPPSY trades at $20.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSDGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas LPPSY's P/E ratio is 18.23. In terms of profitability, BSDGY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to LPPSY's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, BSDGY is more volatile compared to LPPSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSDGY.
BSDGY vs IFABF Comparison
BSDGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSDGY stands at 6.21B. In comparison, IFABF has a market cap of 23.35M. Regarding current trading prices, BSDGY is priced at $27.13, while IFABF trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSDGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas IFABF's P/E ratio is 19.26. In terms of profitability, BSDGY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to IFABF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BSDGY is more volatile compared to IFABF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSDGY.
BSDGY vs USYNF Comparison
BSDGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSDGY stands at 6.21B. In comparison, USYNF has a market cap of 16.77M. Regarding current trading prices, BSDGY is priced at $27.13, while USYNF trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSDGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas USYNF's P/E ratio is -4.90. In terms of profitability, BSDGY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to USYNF's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, BSDGY is more volatile compared to USYNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSDGY.
BSDGY vs TUGHF Comparison
BSDGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSDGY stands at 6.21B. In comparison, TUGHF has a market cap of 11.32M. Regarding current trading prices, BSDGY is priced at $27.13, while TUGHF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSDGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas TUGHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BSDGY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TUGHF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BSDGY is less volatile compared to TUGHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSDGY.
BSDGY vs SEPGY Comparison
BSDGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSDGY stands at 6.21B. In comparison, SEPGY has a market cap of 8.33M. Regarding current trading prices, BSDGY is priced at $27.13, while SEPGY trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSDGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas SEPGY's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, BSDGY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SEPGY's ROE of -6.29%. Regarding short-term risk, BSDGY is more volatile compared to SEPGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSDGY.
BSDGY vs SEPGF Comparison
BSDGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSDGY stands at 6.21B. In comparison, SEPGF has a market cap of 5.03M. Regarding current trading prices, BSDGY is priced at $27.13, while SEPGF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSDGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas SEPGF's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, BSDGY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SEPGF's ROE of -4.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BSDGY is less volatile compared to SEPGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSDGY.
BSDGY vs AHRO Comparison
BSDGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSDGY stands at 6.21B. In comparison, AHRO has a market cap of 5.00M. Regarding current trading prices, BSDGY is priced at $27.13, while AHRO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSDGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas AHRO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BSDGY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AHRO's ROE of +2.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BSDGY is less volatile compared to AHRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSDGY.
BSDGY vs AVLP Comparison
BSDGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSDGY stands at 6.21B. In comparison, AVLP has a market cap of 4.87M. Regarding current trading prices, BSDGY is priced at $27.13, while AVLP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSDGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas AVLP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BSDGY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AVLP's ROE of +2.33%. Regarding short-term risk, BSDGY is more volatile compared to AVLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSDGY.
BSDGY vs TALN Comparison
BSDGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSDGY stands at 6.21B. In comparison, TALN has a market cap of 3.69M. Regarding current trading prices, BSDGY is priced at $27.13, while TALN trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSDGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas TALN's P/E ratio is 4.00. In terms of profitability, BSDGY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TALN's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BSDGY is less volatile compared to TALN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSDGY.
BSDGY vs CRTL Comparison
BSDGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSDGY stands at 6.21B. In comparison, CRTL has a market cap of 2.19M. Regarding current trading prices, BSDGY is priced at $27.13, while CRTL trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSDGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas CRTL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BSDGY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CRTL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BSDGY is less volatile compared to CRTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSDGY.
BSDGY vs JLMC Comparison
BSDGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSDGY stands at 6.21B. In comparison, JLMC has a market cap of 1.46M. Regarding current trading prices, BSDGY is priced at $27.13, while JLMC trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSDGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas JLMC's P/E ratio is 23.75. In terms of profitability, BSDGY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to JLMC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BSDGY is more volatile compared to JLMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSDGY.
BSDGY vs CGAC Comparison
BSDGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSDGY stands at 6.21B. In comparison, CGAC has a market cap of 1.12M. Regarding current trading prices, BSDGY is priced at $27.13, while CGAC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSDGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas CGAC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BSDGY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CGAC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BSDGY is less volatile compared to CGAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSDGY.
BSDGY vs PBBSF Comparison
BSDGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSDGY stands at 6.21B. In comparison, PBBSF has a market cap of 907839.00. Regarding current trading prices, BSDGY is priced at $27.13, while PBBSF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSDGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas PBBSF's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, BSDGY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PBBSF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BSDGY is more volatile compared to PBBSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSDGY.
BSDGY vs SKFG Comparison
BSDGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSDGY stands at 6.21B. In comparison, SKFG has a market cap of 507365.00. Regarding current trading prices, BSDGY is priced at $27.13, while SKFG trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSDGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas SKFG's P/E ratio is -5.10. In terms of profitability, BSDGY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SKFG's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, BSDGY is more volatile compared to SKFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSDGY.
BSDGY vs BLFR Comparison
BSDGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSDGY stands at 6.21B. In comparison, BLFR has a market cap of 390391.00. Regarding current trading prices, BSDGY is priced at $27.13, while BLFR trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSDGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas BLFR's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, BSDGY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BLFR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BSDGY is less volatile compared to BLFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSDGY.
BSDGY vs SUUB Comparison
BSDGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSDGY stands at 6.21B. In comparison, SUUB has a market cap of 81212.00. Regarding current trading prices, BSDGY is priced at $27.13, while SUUB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSDGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas SUUB's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, BSDGY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SUUB's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BSDGY is less volatile compared to SUUB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSDGY.
BSDGY vs AGNY Comparison
BSDGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSDGY stands at 6.21B. In comparison, AGNY has a market cap of 72000.00. Regarding current trading prices, BSDGY is priced at $27.13, while AGNY trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSDGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas AGNY's P/E ratio is -1.20. In terms of profitability, BSDGY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AGNY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BSDGY is more volatile compared to AGNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSDGY.
BSDGY vs CIND Comparison
BSDGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSDGY stands at 6.21B. In comparison, CIND has a market cap of 57600.00. Regarding current trading prices, BSDGY is priced at $27.13, while CIND trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSDGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas CIND's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BSDGY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CIND's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BSDGY is less volatile compared to CIND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSDGY.
BSDGY vs OMVE Comparison
BSDGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSDGY stands at 6.21B. In comparison, OMVE has a market cap of 15518.00. Regarding current trading prices, BSDGY is priced at $27.13, while OMVE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSDGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas OMVE's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, BSDGY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to OMVE's ROE of +7.54%. Regarding short-term risk, BSDGY is less volatile compared to OMVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSDGY.
BSDGY vs LYJN Comparison
BSDGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSDGY stands at 6.21B. In comparison, LYJN has a market cap of 9903.00. Regarding current trading prices, BSDGY is priced at $27.13, while LYJN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSDGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas LYJN's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, BSDGY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to LYJN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BSDGY is less volatile compared to LYJN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSDGY.
BSDGY vs TRUA Comparison
BSDGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSDGY stands at 6.21B. In comparison, TRUA has a market cap of 6895.00. Regarding current trading prices, BSDGY is priced at $27.13, while TRUA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSDGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas TRUA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BSDGY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TRUA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BSDGY is less volatile compared to TRUA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSDGY.
BSDGY vs EDSFF Comparison
BSDGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSDGY stands at 6.21B. In comparison, EDSFF has a market cap of 3314.00. Regarding current trading prices, BSDGY is priced at $27.13, while EDSFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSDGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas EDSFF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BSDGY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to EDSFF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BSDGY is less volatile compared to EDSFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSDGY.
BSDGY vs APPM Comparison
BSDGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSDGY stands at 6.21B. In comparison, APPM has a market cap of 2750.00. Regarding current trading prices, BSDGY is priced at $27.13, while APPM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSDGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas APPM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BSDGY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to APPM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BSDGY is less volatile compared to APPM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSDGY.
BSDGY vs IBGR Comparison
BSDGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSDGY stands at 6.21B. In comparison, IBGR has a market cap of 2230.00. Regarding current trading prices, BSDGY is priced at $27.13, while IBGR trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSDGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas IBGR's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, BSDGY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to IBGR's ROE of +0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, BSDGY is more volatile compared to IBGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSDGY.
BSDGY vs LZENF Comparison
BSDGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSDGY stands at 6.21B. In comparison, LZENF has a market cap of 1364.00. Regarding current trading prices, BSDGY is priced at $27.13, while LZENF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSDGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas LZENF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BSDGY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to LZENF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BSDGY is more volatile compared to LZENF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSDGY.
BSDGY vs SSTU Comparison
BSDGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSDGY stands at 6.21B. In comparison, SSTU has a market cap of 897.00. Regarding current trading prices, BSDGY is priced at $27.13, while SSTU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSDGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas SSTU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BSDGY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SSTU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BSDGY is less volatile compared to SSTU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSDGY.
BSDGY vs SUFF Comparison
BSDGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSDGY stands at 6.21B. In comparison, SUFF has a market cap of 69.00. Regarding current trading prices, BSDGY is priced at $27.13, while SUFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSDGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas SUFF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BSDGY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SUFF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BSDGY is more volatile compared to SUFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSDGY.