Bosideng International Holdings Limited
Bosideng International Holdings Limited BSDGY Peers
See (BSDGY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Apparel - Manufacturers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSDGY | $28.50 | +0.00% | 6.5B | 13.26 | $2.15 | +5.85% |
HNNMY | $2.77 | -0.05% | 113.6B | 21.23 | $0.13 | +4.76% |
HMRZF | $13.54 | +0.00% | 21.7B | 20.83 | $0.65 | +4.81% |
MONRF | $61.14 | +0.00% | 16.5B | 22.56 | $2.71 | +2.39% |
MONRY | $55.78 | +1.03% | 15.1B | 20.61 | $2.71 | +2.64% |
SZHIF | $7.65 | +0.00% | 11.5B | 15.61 | $0.49 | +4.25% |
TRYIY | $13.56 | +0.37% | 10.6B | 19.93 | $0.68 | +1.02% |
TRYIF | $6.66 | +0.00% | 10.4B | 19.59 | $0.34 | +1.83% |
SHZHY | $6.75 | -1.17% | 10.3B | 17.18 | $0.40 | +4.73% |
LPPSY | $20.41 | +0.00% | 7.6B | 18.39 | $1.11 | +1.10% |
Stock Comparison
BSDGY vs HNNMY Comparison
BSDGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSDGY stands at 6.5B. In comparison, HNNMY has a market cap of 113.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BSDGY is priced at $28.50, while HNNMY trades at $2.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSDGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.26, whereas HNNMY's P/E ratio is 21.23. In terms of profitability, BSDGY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to HNNMY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, BSDGY is less volatile compared to HNNMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSDGY.
BSDGY vs HMRZF Comparison
BSDGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSDGY stands at 6.5B. In comparison, HMRZF has a market cap of 21.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BSDGY is priced at $28.50, while HMRZF trades at $13.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSDGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.26, whereas HMRZF's P/E ratio is 20.83. In terms of profitability, BSDGY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to HMRZF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, BSDGY is less volatile compared to HMRZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSDGY.
BSDGY vs MONRF Comparison
BSDGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSDGY stands at 6.5B. In comparison, MONRF has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BSDGY is priced at $28.50, while MONRF trades at $61.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSDGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.26, whereas MONRF's P/E ratio is 22.56. In terms of profitability, BSDGY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MONRF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BSDGY is less volatile compared to MONRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSDGY.
BSDGY vs MONRY Comparison
BSDGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSDGY stands at 6.5B. In comparison, MONRY has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BSDGY is priced at $28.50, while MONRY trades at $55.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSDGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.26, whereas MONRY's P/E ratio is 20.61. In terms of profitability, BSDGY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MONRY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BSDGY is less volatile compared to MONRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSDGY.
BSDGY vs SZHIF Comparison
BSDGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSDGY stands at 6.5B. In comparison, SZHIF has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BSDGY is priced at $28.50, while SZHIF trades at $7.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSDGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.26, whereas SZHIF's P/E ratio is 15.61. In terms of profitability, BSDGY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SZHIF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BSDGY and SZHIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BSDGY vs TRYIY Comparison
BSDGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSDGY stands at 6.5B. In comparison, TRYIY has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BSDGY is priced at $28.50, while TRYIY trades at $13.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSDGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.26, whereas TRYIY's P/E ratio is 19.93. In terms of profitability, BSDGY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TRYIY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BSDGY is less volatile compared to TRYIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSDGY.
BSDGY vs TRYIF Comparison
BSDGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSDGY stands at 6.5B. In comparison, TRYIF has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BSDGY is priced at $28.50, while TRYIF trades at $6.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSDGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.26, whereas TRYIF's P/E ratio is 19.59. In terms of profitability, BSDGY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TRYIF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BSDGY is less volatile compared to TRYIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSDGY.
BSDGY vs SHZHY Comparison
BSDGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSDGY stands at 6.5B. In comparison, SHZHY has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BSDGY is priced at $28.50, while SHZHY trades at $6.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSDGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.26, whereas SHZHY's P/E ratio is 17.18. In terms of profitability, BSDGY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SHZHY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BSDGY is less volatile compared to SHZHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSDGY.
BSDGY vs LPPSY Comparison
BSDGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSDGY stands at 6.5B. In comparison, LPPSY has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BSDGY is priced at $28.50, while LPPSY trades at $20.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSDGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.26, whereas LPPSY's P/E ratio is 18.39. In terms of profitability, BSDGY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to LPPSY's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, BSDGY and LPPSY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BSDGY vs BSDGF Comparison
BSDGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSDGY stands at 6.5B. In comparison, BSDGF has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BSDGY is priced at $28.50, while BSDGF trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSDGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.26, whereas BSDGF's P/E ratio is 13.59. In terms of profitability, BSDGY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BSDGF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BSDGY and BSDGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BSDGY vs RYPPF Comparison
BSDGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSDGY stands at 6.5B. In comparison, RYPPF has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, BSDGY is priced at $28.50, while RYPPF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSDGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.26, whereas RYPPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BSDGY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to RYPPF's ROE of +1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, BSDGY is less volatile compared to RYPPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSDGY.
BSDGY vs BOSSY Comparison
BSDGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSDGY stands at 6.5B. In comparison, BOSSY has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BSDGY is priced at $28.50, while BOSSY trades at $9.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSDGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.26, whereas BOSSY's P/E ratio is 13.32. In terms of profitability, BSDGY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BOSSY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BSDGY and BOSSY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BSDGY vs CGGGF Comparison
BSDGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSDGY stands at 6.5B. In comparison, CGGGF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BSDGY is priced at $28.50, while CGGGF trades at $1.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSDGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.26, whereas CGGGF's P/E ratio is 22.15. In terms of profitability, BSDGY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CGGGF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BSDGY and CGGGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BSDGY vs WACLY Comparison
BSDGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSDGY stands at 6.5B. In comparison, WACLY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BSDGY is priced at $28.50, while WACLY trades at $166.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSDGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.26, whereas WACLY's P/E ratio is 37.58. In terms of profitability, BSDGY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to WACLY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BSDGY is less volatile compared to WACLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSDGY.
BSDGY vs DELTF Comparison
BSDGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSDGY stands at 6.5B. In comparison, DELTF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BSDGY is priced at $28.50, while DELTF trades at $50.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSDGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.26, whereas DELTF's P/E ratio is 14.20. In terms of profitability, BSDGY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to DELTF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BSDGY is less volatile compared to DELTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSDGY.
BSDGY vs SERNF Comparison
BSDGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSDGY stands at 6.5B. In comparison, SERNF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, BSDGY is priced at $28.50, while SERNF trades at $17.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSDGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.26, whereas SERNF's P/E ratio is 10.73. In terms of profitability, BSDGY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SERNF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BSDGY is less volatile compared to SERNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSDGY.
BSDGY vs JNBYF Comparison
BSDGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSDGY stands at 6.5B. In comparison, JNBYF has a market cap of 784.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BSDGY is priced at $28.50, while JNBYF trades at $1.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSDGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.26, whereas JNBYF's P/E ratio is 6.33. In terms of profitability, BSDGY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to JNBYF's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, BSDGY is less volatile compared to JNBYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSDGY.
BSDGY vs WACLF Comparison
BSDGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSDGY stands at 6.5B. In comparison, WACLF has a market cap of 780.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BSDGY is priced at $28.50, while WACLF trades at $15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSDGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.26, whereas WACLF's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, BSDGY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to WACLF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BSDGY is less volatile compared to WACLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSDGY.
BSDGY vs MKKOF Comparison
BSDGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSDGY stands at 6.5B. In comparison, MKKOF has a market cap of 525.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BSDGY is priced at $28.50, while MKKOF trades at $12.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSDGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.26, whereas MKKOF's P/E ratio is 19.34. In terms of profitability, BSDGY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MKKOF's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, BSDGY is less volatile compared to MKKOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSDGY.
BSDGY vs JWTXF Comparison
BSDGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSDGY stands at 6.5B. In comparison, JWTXF has a market cap of 517.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BSDGY is priced at $28.50, while JWTXF trades at $7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSDGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.26, whereas JWTXF's P/E ratio is 8.83. In terms of profitability, BSDGY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to JWTXF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BSDGY and JWTXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BSDGY vs TSIHF Comparison
BSDGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSDGY stands at 6.5B. In comparison, TSIHF has a market cap of 473M. Regarding current trading prices, BSDGY is priced at $28.50, while TSIHF trades at $7.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSDGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.26, whereas TSIHF's P/E ratio is 4.93. In terms of profitability, BSDGY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TSIHF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BSDGY is less volatile compared to TSIHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSDGY.
BSDGY vs VDEVF Comparison
BSDGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSDGY stands at 6.5B. In comparison, VDEVF has a market cap of 441.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BSDGY is priced at $28.50, while VDEVF trades at $35.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSDGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.26, whereas VDEVF's P/E ratio is 12.65. In terms of profitability, BSDGY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to VDEVF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BSDGY and VDEVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BSDGY vs CDGXY Comparison
BSDGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSDGY stands at 6.5B. In comparison, CDGXY has a market cap of 330.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BSDGY is priced at $28.50, while CDGXY trades at $2.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSDGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.26, whereas CDGXY's P/E ratio is 11.28. In terms of profitability, BSDGY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CDGXY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BSDGY and CDGXY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BSDGY vs CDGXF Comparison
BSDGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSDGY stands at 6.5B. In comparison, CDGXF has a market cap of 175.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BSDGY is priced at $28.50, while CDGXF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSDGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.26, whereas CDGXF's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, BSDGY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CDGXF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BSDGY is less volatile compared to CDGXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSDGY.
BSDGY vs WQTEF Comparison
BSDGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSDGY stands at 6.5B. In comparison, WQTEF has a market cap of 167.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BSDGY is priced at $28.50, while WQTEF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSDGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.26, whereas WQTEF's P/E ratio is -0.88. In terms of profitability, BSDGY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to WQTEF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BSDGY is less volatile compared to WQTEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSDGY.
BSDGY vs ECNLF Comparison
BSDGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSDGY stands at 6.5B. In comparison, ECNLF has a market cap of 138M. Regarding current trading prices, BSDGY is priced at $28.50, while ECNLF trades at $1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSDGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.26, whereas ECNLF's P/E ratio is -5.71. In terms of profitability, BSDGY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ECNLF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BSDGY is less volatile compared to ECNLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSDGY.
BSDGY vs CHRLF Comparison
BSDGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSDGY stands at 6.5B. In comparison, CHRLF has a market cap of 84.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BSDGY is priced at $28.50, while CHRLF trades at $5.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSDGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.26, whereas CHRLF's P/E ratio is 8.17. In terms of profitability, BSDGY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CHRLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BSDGY and CHRLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BSDGY vs TFRFF Comparison
BSDGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSDGY stands at 6.5B. In comparison, TFRFF has a market cap of 82.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BSDGY is priced at $28.50, while TFRFF trades at $6.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSDGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.26, whereas TFRFF's P/E ratio is 6.87. In terms of profitability, BSDGY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TFRFF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BSDGY and TFRFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BSDGY vs NLLGF Comparison
BSDGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSDGY stands at 6.5B. In comparison, NLLGF has a market cap of 67M. Regarding current trading prices, BSDGY is priced at $28.50, while NLLGF trades at $5.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSDGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.26, whereas NLLGF's P/E ratio is 5.54. In terms of profitability, BSDGY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NLLGF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BSDGY and NLLGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BSDGY vs TAPCF Comparison
BSDGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSDGY stands at 6.5B. In comparison, TAPCF has a market cap of 42.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BSDGY is priced at $28.50, while TAPCF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSDGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.26, whereas TAPCF's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, BSDGY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TAPCF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BSDGY and TAPCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BSDGY vs IFABF Comparison
BSDGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSDGY stands at 6.5B. In comparison, IFABF has a market cap of 23.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BSDGY is priced at $28.50, while IFABF trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSDGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.26, whereas IFABF's P/E ratio is 25.69. In terms of profitability, BSDGY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to IFABF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BSDGY is less volatile compared to IFABF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSDGY.
BSDGY vs USYNF Comparison
BSDGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSDGY stands at 6.5B. In comparison, USYNF has a market cap of 16.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BSDGY is priced at $28.50, while USYNF trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSDGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.26, whereas USYNF's P/E ratio is -4.64. In terms of profitability, BSDGY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to USYNF's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, BSDGY and USYNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BSDGY vs TUGHF Comparison
BSDGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSDGY stands at 6.5B. In comparison, TUGHF has a market cap of 11.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BSDGY is priced at $28.50, while TUGHF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSDGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.26, whereas TUGHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BSDGY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TUGHF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BSDGY is less volatile compared to TUGHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSDGY.
BSDGY vs SEPGY Comparison
BSDGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSDGY stands at 6.5B. In comparison, SEPGY has a market cap of 8.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BSDGY is priced at $28.50, while SEPGY trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSDGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.26, whereas SEPGY's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, BSDGY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SEPGY's ROE of -6.29%. Regarding short-term risk, BSDGY and SEPGY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BSDGY vs SEPGF Comparison
BSDGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSDGY stands at 6.5B. In comparison, SEPGF has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, BSDGY is priced at $28.50, while SEPGF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSDGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.26, whereas SEPGF's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, BSDGY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SEPGF's ROE of -4.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BSDGY is less volatile compared to SEPGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSDGY.
BSDGY vs AVLP Comparison
BSDGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSDGY stands at 6.5B. In comparison, AVLP has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BSDGY is priced at $28.50, while AVLP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSDGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.26, whereas AVLP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BSDGY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AVLP's ROE of +2.33%. Regarding short-term risk, BSDGY and AVLP have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BSDGY vs TALN Comparison
BSDGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSDGY stands at 6.5B. In comparison, TALN has a market cap of 3.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BSDGY is priced at $28.50, while TALN trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSDGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.26, whereas TALN's P/E ratio is 4.00. In terms of profitability, BSDGY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TALN's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BSDGY is less volatile compared to TALN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSDGY.
BSDGY vs AHRO Comparison
BSDGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSDGY stands at 6.5B. In comparison, AHRO has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BSDGY is priced at $28.50, while AHRO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSDGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.26, whereas AHRO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BSDGY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AHRO's ROE of +1.68%. Regarding short-term risk, BSDGY is less volatile compared to AHRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSDGY.
BSDGY vs JLMC Comparison
BSDGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSDGY stands at 6.5B. In comparison, JLMC has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BSDGY is priced at $28.50, while JLMC trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSDGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.26, whereas JLMC's P/E ratio is 23.75. In terms of profitability, BSDGY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to JLMC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BSDGY and JLMC have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BSDGY vs CGAC Comparison
BSDGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSDGY stands at 6.5B. In comparison, CGAC has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BSDGY is priced at $28.50, while CGAC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSDGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.26, whereas CGAC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BSDGY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CGAC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BSDGY is less volatile compared to CGAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSDGY.
BSDGY vs BLFR Comparison
BSDGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSDGY stands at 6.5B. In comparison, BLFR has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, BSDGY is priced at $28.50, while BLFR trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSDGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.26, whereas BLFR's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, BSDGY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BLFR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BSDGY is less volatile compared to BLFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSDGY.
BSDGY vs PBBSF Comparison
BSDGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSDGY stands at 6.5B. In comparison, PBBSF has a market cap of 907.8K. Regarding current trading prices, BSDGY is priced at $28.50, while PBBSF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSDGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.26, whereas PBBSF's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, BSDGY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PBBSF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BSDGY and PBBSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BSDGY vs SKFG Comparison
BSDGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSDGY stands at 6.5B. In comparison, SKFG has a market cap of 550.3K. Regarding current trading prices, BSDGY is priced at $28.50, while SKFG trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSDGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.26, whereas SKFG's P/E ratio is -5.53. In terms of profitability, BSDGY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SKFG's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, BSDGY is less volatile compared to SKFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSDGY.
BSDGY vs SUUB Comparison
BSDGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSDGY stands at 6.5B. In comparison, SUUB has a market cap of 81.2K. Regarding current trading prices, BSDGY is priced at $28.50, while SUUB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSDGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.26, whereas SUUB's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, BSDGY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SUUB's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BSDGY is less volatile compared to SUUB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSDGY.
BSDGY vs AGNY Comparison
BSDGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSDGY stands at 6.5B. In comparison, AGNY has a market cap of 72K. Regarding current trading prices, BSDGY is priced at $28.50, while AGNY trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSDGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.26, whereas AGNY's P/E ratio is -1.20. In terms of profitability, BSDGY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AGNY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BSDGY and AGNY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BSDGY vs CIND Comparison
BSDGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSDGY stands at 6.5B. In comparison, CIND has a market cap of 57.6K. Regarding current trading prices, BSDGY is priced at $28.50, while CIND trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSDGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.26, whereas CIND's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BSDGY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CIND's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BSDGY is less volatile compared to CIND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSDGY.
BSDGY vs CRTL Comparison
BSDGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSDGY stands at 6.5B. In comparison, CRTL has a market cap of 26.1K. Regarding current trading prices, BSDGY is priced at $28.50, while CRTL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSDGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.26, whereas CRTL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BSDGY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CRTL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BSDGY and CRTL have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BSDGY vs OMVE Comparison
BSDGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSDGY stands at 6.5B. In comparison, OMVE has a market cap of 15.5K. Regarding current trading prices, BSDGY is priced at $28.50, while OMVE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSDGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.26, whereas OMVE's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, BSDGY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to OMVE's ROE of +7.54%. Regarding short-term risk, BSDGY is less volatile compared to OMVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSDGY.
BSDGY vs LYJN Comparison
BSDGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSDGY stands at 6.5B. In comparison, LYJN has a market cap of 9.9K. Regarding current trading prices, BSDGY is priced at $28.50, while LYJN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSDGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.26, whereas LYJN's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, BSDGY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to LYJN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BSDGY is less volatile compared to LYJN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSDGY.
BSDGY vs TRUA Comparison
BSDGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSDGY stands at 6.5B. In comparison, TRUA has a market cap of 6.9K. Regarding current trading prices, BSDGY is priced at $28.50, while TRUA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSDGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.26, whereas TRUA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BSDGY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TRUA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BSDGY is less volatile compared to TRUA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSDGY.
BSDGY vs EDSFF Comparison
BSDGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSDGY stands at 6.5B. In comparison, EDSFF has a market cap of 3.3K. Regarding current trading prices, BSDGY is priced at $28.50, while EDSFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSDGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.26, whereas EDSFF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BSDGY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to EDSFF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BSDGY is less volatile compared to EDSFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSDGY.
BSDGY vs APPM Comparison
BSDGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSDGY stands at 6.5B. In comparison, APPM has a market cap of 2.8K. Regarding current trading prices, BSDGY is priced at $28.50, while APPM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSDGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.26, whereas APPM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BSDGY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to APPM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BSDGY and APPM have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BSDGY vs IBGR Comparison
BSDGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSDGY stands at 6.5B. In comparison, IBGR has a market cap of 2K. Regarding current trading prices, BSDGY is priced at $28.50, while IBGR trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSDGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.26, whereas IBGR's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, BSDGY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to IBGR's ROE of +0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, BSDGY is less volatile compared to IBGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSDGY.
BSDGY vs LZENF Comparison
BSDGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSDGY stands at 6.5B. In comparison, LZENF has a market cap of 1.4K. Regarding current trading prices, BSDGY is priced at $28.50, while LZENF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSDGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.26, whereas LZENF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BSDGY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to LZENF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BSDGY and LZENF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BSDGY vs SSTU Comparison
BSDGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSDGY stands at 6.5B. In comparison, SSTU has a market cap of 897. Regarding current trading prices, BSDGY is priced at $28.50, while SSTU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSDGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.26, whereas SSTU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BSDGY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SSTU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BSDGY is less volatile compared to SSTU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSDGY.
BSDGY vs SUFF Comparison
BSDGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSDGY stands at 6.5B. In comparison, SUFF has a market cap of 69. Regarding current trading prices, BSDGY is priced at $28.50, while SUFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSDGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.26, whereas SUFF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BSDGY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SUFF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BSDGY and SUFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BSDGY vs JKRO Comparison
BSDGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSDGY stands at 6.5B. In comparison, JKRO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BSDGY is priced at $28.50, while JKRO trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSDGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.26, whereas JKRO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BSDGY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to JKRO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BSDGY and JKRO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BSDGY vs GLLHF Comparison
BSDGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSDGY stands at 6.5B. In comparison, GLLHF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BSDGY is priced at $28.50, while GLLHF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSDGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.26, whereas GLLHF's P/E ratio is 12.25. In terms of profitability, BSDGY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GLLHF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BSDGY and GLLHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BSDGY vs WLFDY Comparison
BSDGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSDGY stands at 6.5B. In comparison, WLFDY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BSDGY is priced at $28.50, while WLFDY trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSDGY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.26, whereas WLFDY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BSDGY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to WLFDY's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, BSDGY and WLFDY have similar daily volatility (0.00).