Berkshire Hathaway Inc.
Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-A) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (BRK-A) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Insurance - Diversified Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BRK-A | $734,838.94 | -0.24% | 1.1T | 15.80 | $46,554.70 | N/A |
| BRK-B | $490.03 | -0.38% | 1.1T | 15.79 | $31.04 | N/A |
| AIG-PA | $62.68 | +6.02% | 112.5B | 5.48 | $11.44 | +2.27% |
| AEH | $25.67 | +0.00% | 52.5B | 19.37 | $1.33 | N/A |
| AED | $25.52 | +0.00% | 52.2B | 19.26 | $1.33 | N/A |
| AEB | $25.01 | -0.08% | 51.1B | 18.88 | $1.33 | N/A |
| AIG | $76.74 | +0.34% | 41.4B | 14.13 | $5.43 | +2.27% |
| HIG | $132.93 | -1.10% | 37.1B | 9.98 | $13.32 | +1.68% |
| SLF | $62.74 | -0.19% | 34.8B | 13.85 | $4.53 | +4.14% |
| ACGL | $93.47 | -0.80% | 33.9B | 8.06 | $11.60 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
BRK-A vs BRK-B Comparison March 2026
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, BRK-B has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $734,838.94, while BRK-B trades at $490.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 15.80, whereas BRK-B's P/E ratio is 15.79. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BRK-B's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is less volatile compared to BRK-B. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.Check BRK-B's competition here
BRK-A vs AIG-PA Comparison March 2026
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, AIG-PA has a market cap of 112.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $734,838.94, while AIG-PA trades at $62.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 15.80, whereas AIG-PA's P/E ratio is 5.48. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AIG-PA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is less volatile compared to AIG-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.Check AIG-PA's competition here
BRK-A vs AEH Comparison March 2026
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, AEH has a market cap of 52.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $734,838.94, while AEH trades at $25.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 15.80, whereas AEH's P/E ratio is 19.37. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AEH's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is more volatile compared to AEH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.Check AEH's competition here
BRK-A vs AED Comparison March 2026
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, AED has a market cap of 52.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $734,838.94, while AED trades at $25.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 15.80, whereas AED's P/E ratio is 19.26. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AED's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is more volatile compared to AED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.Check AED's competition here
BRK-A vs AEB Comparison March 2026
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, AEB has a market cap of 51.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $734,838.94, while AEB trades at $25.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 15.80, whereas AEB's P/E ratio is 18.88. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AEB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is more volatile compared to AEB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.Check AEB's competition here
BRK-A vs AIG Comparison March 2026
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, AIG has a market cap of 41.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $734,838.94, while AIG trades at $76.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 15.80, whereas AIG's P/E ratio is 14.13. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AIG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is less volatile compared to AIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.Check AIG's competition here
BRK-A vs HIG Comparison March 2026
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, HIG has a market cap of 37.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $734,838.94, while HIG trades at $132.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 15.80, whereas HIG's P/E ratio is 9.98. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HIG's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is less volatile compared to HIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.Check HIG's competition here
BRK-A vs SLF Comparison March 2026
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, SLF has a market cap of 34.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $734,838.94, while SLF trades at $62.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 15.80, whereas SLF's P/E ratio is 13.85. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SLF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is less volatile compared to SLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.Check SLF's competition here
BRK-A vs ACGL Comparison March 2026
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, ACGL has a market cap of 33.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $734,838.94, while ACGL trades at $93.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 15.80, whereas ACGL's P/E ratio is 8.06. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ACGL's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is less volatile compared to ACGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.Check ACGL's competition here
BRK-A vs ATH Comparison March 2026
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, ATH has a market cap of 19.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $734,838.94, while ATH trades at $83.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 15.80, whereas ATH's P/E ratio is 4.42. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ATH's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is less volatile compared to ATH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.Check ATH's competition here
BRK-A vs PFG Comparison March 2026
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, PFG has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $734,838.94, while PFG trades at $85.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 15.80, whereas PFG's P/E ratio is 16.35. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PFG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is less volatile compared to PFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.Check PFG's competition here
BRK-A vs HIG-PG Comparison March 2026
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, HIG-PG has a market cap of 18.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $734,838.94, while HIG-PG trades at $24.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 15.80, whereas HIG-PG's P/E ratio is 3.42. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HIG-PG's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is more volatile compared to HIG-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.Check HIG-PG's competition here
BRK-A vs ACGLP Comparison March 2026
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, ACGLP has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $734,838.94, while ACGLP trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 15.80, whereas ACGLP's P/E ratio is 5.03. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ACGLP's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is more volatile compared to ACGLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.Check ACGLP's competition here
BRK-A vs BNT Comparison March 2026
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, BNT has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $734,838.94, while BNT trades at $40.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 15.80, whereas BNT's P/E ratio is 13.75. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BNT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is less volatile compared to BNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.Check BNT's competition here
BRK-A vs ACGLO Comparison March 2026
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, ACGLO has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $734,838.94, while ACGLO trades at $20.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 15.80, whereas ACGLO's P/E ratio is 4.31. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ACGLO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is more volatile compared to ACGLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.Check ACGLO's competition here
BRK-A vs EQH Comparison March 2026
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, EQH has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $734,838.94, while EQH trades at $37.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 15.80, whereas EQH's P/E ratio is -7.70. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EQH's ROE of -1.52%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is less volatile compared to EQH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.Check EQH's competition here
BRK-A vs AEG Comparison March 2026
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, AEG has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $734,838.94, while AEG trades at $6.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 15.80, whereas AEG's P/E ratio is 7.54. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AEG's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is less volatile compared to AEG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.Check AEG's competition here
BRK-A vs ORI Comparison March 2026
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, ORI has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $734,838.94, while ORI trades at $40.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 15.80, whereas ORI's P/E ratio is 10.78. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ORI's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is less volatile compared to ORI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.Check ORI's competition here
BRK-A vs ACGLN Comparison March 2026
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, ACGLN has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $734,838.94, while ACGLN trades at $16.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 15.80, whereas ACGLN's P/E ratio is 3.61. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ACGLN's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is less volatile compared to ACGLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.Check ACGLN's competition here
BRK-A vs EQH-PA Comparison March 2026
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, EQH-PA has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $734,838.94, while EQH-PA trades at $19.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 15.80, whereas EQH-PA's P/E ratio is 5.24. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EQH-PA's ROE of -1.52%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is less volatile compared to EQH-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.Check EQH-PA's competition here
BRK-A vs UNMA Comparison March 2026
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, UNMA has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $734,838.94, while UNMA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 15.80, whereas UNMA's P/E ratio is 4.93. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to UNMA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. BRK-A has daily volatility of 0.91 and UNMA has daily volatility of N/A.Check UNMA's competition here
BRK-A vs ESGRP Comparison March 2026
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, ESGRP has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $734,838.94, while ESGRP trades at $20.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 15.80, whereas ESGRP's P/E ratio is -13.72. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ESGRP's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is more volatile compared to ESGRP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.Check ESGRP's competition here
BRK-A vs ATH-PC Comparison March 2026
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, ATH-PC has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $734,838.94, while ATH-PC trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 15.80, whereas ATH-PC's P/E ratio is 3.14. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ATH-PC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is more volatile compared to ATH-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.Check ATH-PC's competition here
BRK-A vs ATH-PE Comparison March 2026
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, ATH-PE has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $734,838.94, while ATH-PE trades at $24.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 15.80, whereas ATH-PE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ATH-PE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is less volatile compared to ATH-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.Check ATH-PE's competition here
BRK-A vs ESGR Comparison March 2026
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, ESGR has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $734,838.94, while ESGR trades at $337.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 15.80, whereas ESGR's P/E ratio is 10.83. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ESGR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is more volatile compared to ESGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.Check ESGR's competition here
BRK-A vs ESGRO Comparison March 2026
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, ESGRO has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $734,838.94, while ESGRO trades at $19.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 15.80, whereas ESGRO's P/E ratio is -12.87. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ESGRO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is more volatile compared to ESGRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.Check ESGRO's competition here
BRK-A vs EQH-PC Comparison March 2026
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, EQH-PC has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $734,838.94, while EQH-PC trades at $15.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 15.80, whereas EQH-PC's P/E ratio is 4.18. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EQH-PC's ROE of -1.52%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is less volatile compared to EQH-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.Check EQH-PC's competition here
BRK-A vs ATH-PA Comparison March 2026
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, ATH-PA has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $734,838.94, while ATH-PA trades at $23.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 15.80, whereas ATH-PA's P/E ratio is 2.96. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ATH-PA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is more volatile compared to ATH-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.Check ATH-PA's competition here
BRK-A vs ATH-PB Comparison March 2026
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, ATH-PB has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $734,838.94, while ATH-PB trades at $18.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 15.80, whereas ATH-PB's P/E ratio is 2.32. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ATH-PB's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is less volatile compared to ATH-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.Check ATH-PB's competition here
BRK-A vs CNO-PA Comparison March 2026
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, CNO-PA has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $734,838.94, while CNO-PA trades at $19.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 15.80, whereas CNO-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CNO-PA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is less volatile compared to CNO-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.Check CNO-PA's competition here
BRK-A vs ATH-PD Comparison March 2026
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, ATH-PD has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $734,838.94, while ATH-PD trades at $16.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 15.80, whereas ATH-PD's P/E ratio is 2.03. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ATH-PD's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is less volatile compared to ATH-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.Check ATH-PD's competition here
BRK-A vs FIHL Comparison March 2026
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, FIHL has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $734,838.94, while FIHL trades at $18.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 15.80, whereas FIHL's P/E ratio is 8.86. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FIHL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is less volatile compared to FIHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.Check FIHL's competition here
BRK-A vs RZC Comparison March 2026
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, RZC has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $734,838.94, while RZC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 15.80, whereas RZC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RZC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. BRK-A has daily volatility of 0.91 and RZC has daily volatility of N/A.Check RZC's competition here
BRK-A vs GSHD Comparison March 2026
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, GSHD has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $734,838.94, while GSHD trades at $44.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 15.80, whereas GSHD's P/E ratio is 42.47. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GSHD's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is less volatile compared to GSHD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.Check GSHD's competition here
BRK-A vs XZO Comparison March 2026
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, XZO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $734,838.94, while XZO trades at $15.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 15.80, whereas XZO's P/E ratio is 15.80. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to XZO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is less volatile compared to XZO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.Check XZO's competition here
BRK-A vs IGIC Comparison March 2026
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, IGIC has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $734,838.94, while IGIC trades at $23.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 15.80, whereas IGIC's P/E ratio is 8.13. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IGIC's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is less volatile compared to IGIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.Check IGIC's competition here
BRK-A vs AIZN Comparison March 2026
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, AIZN has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $734,838.94, while AIZN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 15.80, whereas AIZN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AIZN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. BRK-A has daily volatility of 0.91 and AIZN has daily volatility of N/A.Check AIZN's competition here
BRK-A vs ARGD Comparison March 2026
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, ARGD has a market cap of 874.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $734,838.94, while ARGD trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 15.80, whereas ARGD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ARGD's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is more volatile compared to ARGD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.Check ARGD's competition here
BRK-A vs WDH Comparison March 2026
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, WDH has a market cap of 624M. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $734,838.94, while WDH trades at $1.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 15.80, whereas WDH's P/E ratio is 8.63. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WDH's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is less volatile compared to WDH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.Check WDH's competition here
BRK-A vs YB Comparison March 2026
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, YB has a market cap of 147.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $734,838.94, while YB trades at $19.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 15.80, whereas YB's P/E ratio is 3.26. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to YB's ROE of +1.89%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is less volatile compared to YB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.Check YB's competition here
BRK-A vs FGNX Comparison March 2026
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, FGNX has a market cap of 54.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $734,838.94, while FGNX trades at $6.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 15.80, whereas FGNX's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FGNX's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is less volatile compared to FGNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.Check FGNX's competition here
BRK-A vs FGFPP Comparison March 2026
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, FGFPP has a market cap of 25.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $734,838.94, while FGFPP trades at $19.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 15.80, whereas FGFPP's P/E ratio is -7.69. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FGFPP's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is less volatile compared to FGFPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.Check FGFPP's competition here
BRK-A vs FGF Comparison March 2026
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, FGF has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $734,838.94, while FGF trades at $3.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 15.80, whereas FGF's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FGF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is less volatile compared to FGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.Check FGF's competition here
BRK-A vs WTREP Comparison March 2026
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, WTREP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $734,838.94, while WTREP trades at $25.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 15.80, whereas WTREP's P/E ratio is 1.35. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WTREP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is more volatile compared to WTREP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.Check WTREP's competition here
BRK-A vs IGICW Comparison March 2026
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, IGICW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $734,838.94, while IGICW trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 15.80, whereas IGICW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IGICW's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is less volatile compared to IGICW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.Check IGICW's competition here
BRK-A vs ANAT Comparison March 2026
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, ANAT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $734,838.94, while ANAT trades at $188.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 15.80, whereas ANAT's P/E ratio is 6.73. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ANAT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is more volatile compared to ANAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.Check ANAT's competition here