Berkshire Hathaway Inc.
Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-A) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (BRK-A) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Insurance - Diversified Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BRK-A | $746,100.00 | +0.00% | 1.1T | 15.92 | $46,897.09 | N/A |
| BRK-B | $496.94 | +0.00% | 1.1T | 15.92 | $31.29 | N/A |
| AIG-PA | $62.68 | +6.02% | 112.5B | 5.48 | $11.44 | +2.18% |
| AEH | $25.67 | +0.00% | 52.5B | 19.37 | $1.33 | N/A |
| AED | $25.52 | +0.00% | 52.2B | 19.26 | $1.33 | N/A |
| AEB | $25.01 | -0.08% | 51.1B | 18.88 | $1.33 | N/A |
| AIG | $79.54 | +0.00% | 43.4B | 14.81 | $5.43 | +2.18% |
| HIG | $140.31 | +0.00% | 39.7B | 10.67 | $13.32 | +1.53% |
| SLF | $65.32 | -0.01% | 36.8B | 14.68 | $4.52 | +3.79% |
| ACGL | $98.34 | +0.00% | 35.7B | 8.49 | $11.60 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
BRK-A vs BRK-B Comparison February 2026
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, BRK-B has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $746,100.00, while BRK-B trades at $496.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 15.92, whereas BRK-B's P/E ratio is 15.92. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BRK-B's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is less volatile compared to BRK-B. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.Check BRK-B's competition here
BRK-A vs AIG-PA Comparison February 2026
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, AIG-PA has a market cap of 112.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $746,100.00, while AIG-PA trades at $62.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 15.92, whereas AIG-PA's P/E ratio is 5.48. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AIG-PA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is less volatile compared to AIG-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.Check AIG-PA's competition here
BRK-A vs AEH Comparison February 2026
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, AEH has a market cap of 52.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $746,100.00, while AEH trades at $25.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 15.92, whereas AEH's P/E ratio is 19.37. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AEH's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is more volatile compared to AEH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.Check AEH's competition here
BRK-A vs AED Comparison February 2026
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, AED has a market cap of 52.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $746,100.00, while AED trades at $25.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 15.92, whereas AED's P/E ratio is 19.26. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AED's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is more volatile compared to AED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.Check AED's competition here
BRK-A vs AEB Comparison February 2026
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, AEB has a market cap of 51.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $746,100.00, while AEB trades at $25.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 15.92, whereas AEB's P/E ratio is 18.88. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AEB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is more volatile compared to AEB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.Check AEB's competition here
BRK-A vs AIG Comparison February 2026
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, AIG has a market cap of 43.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $746,100.00, while AIG trades at $79.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 15.92, whereas AIG's P/E ratio is 14.81. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AIG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is less volatile compared to AIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.Check AIG's competition here
BRK-A vs HIG Comparison February 2026
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, HIG has a market cap of 39.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $746,100.00, while HIG trades at $140.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 15.92, whereas HIG's P/E ratio is 10.67. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HIG's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is less volatile compared to HIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.Check HIG's competition here
BRK-A vs SLF Comparison February 2026
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, SLF has a market cap of 36.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $746,100.00, while SLF trades at $65.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 15.92, whereas SLF's P/E ratio is 14.68. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SLF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is less volatile compared to SLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.Check SLF's competition here
BRK-A vs ACGL Comparison February 2026
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, ACGL has a market cap of 35.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $746,100.00, while ACGL trades at $98.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 15.92, whereas ACGL's P/E ratio is 8.49. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ACGL's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is less volatile compared to ACGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.Check ACGL's competition here
BRK-A vs PFG Comparison February 2026
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, PFG has a market cap of 21B. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $746,100.00, while PFG trades at $92.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 15.92, whereas PFG's P/E ratio is 14.04. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PFG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is less volatile compared to PFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.Check PFG's competition here
BRK-A vs ATH Comparison February 2026
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, ATH has a market cap of 19.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $746,100.00, while ATH trades at $83.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 15.92, whereas ATH's P/E ratio is 4.42. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ATH's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is less volatile compared to ATH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.Check ATH's competition here
BRK-A vs HIG-PG Comparison February 2026
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, HIG-PG has a market cap of 18.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $746,100.00, while HIG-PG trades at $25.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 15.92, whereas HIG-PG's P/E ratio is 3.43. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HIG-PG's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is more volatile compared to HIG-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.Check HIG-PG's competition here
BRK-A vs ACGLP Comparison February 2026
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, ACGLP has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $746,100.00, while ACGLP trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 15.92, whereas ACGLP's P/E ratio is 5.03. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ACGLP's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is more volatile compared to ACGLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.Check ACGLP's competition here
BRK-A vs BNT Comparison February 2026
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, BNT has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $746,100.00, while BNT trades at $46.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 15.92, whereas BNT's P/E ratio is 15.40. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BNT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is less volatile compared to BNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.Check BNT's competition here
BRK-A vs EQH Comparison February 2026
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, EQH has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $746,100.00, while EQH trades at $44.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 15.92, whereas EQH's P/E ratio is -9.16. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EQH's ROE of -1.52%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is less volatile compared to EQH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.Check EQH's competition here
BRK-A vs ACGLO Comparison February 2026
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, ACGLO has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $746,100.00, while ACGLO trades at $21.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 15.92, whereas ACGLO's P/E ratio is 4.53. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ACGLO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is more volatile compared to ACGLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.Check ACGLO's competition here
BRK-A vs AEG Comparison February 2026
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, AEG has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $746,100.00, while AEG trades at $7.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 15.92, whereas AEG's P/E ratio is 8.10. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AEG's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is less volatile compared to AEG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.Check AEG's competition here
BRK-A vs ORI Comparison February 2026
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, ORI has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $746,100.00, while ORI trades at $41.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 15.92, whereas ORI's P/E ratio is 11.08. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ORI's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is less volatile compared to ORI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.Check ORI's competition here
BRK-A vs ACGLN Comparison February 2026
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, ACGLN has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $746,100.00, while ACGLN trades at $17.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 15.92, whereas ACGLN's P/E ratio is 3.79. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ACGLN's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is less volatile compared to ACGLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.Check ACGLN's competition here
BRK-A vs EQH-PA Comparison February 2026
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, EQH-PA has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $746,100.00, while EQH-PA trades at $20.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 15.92, whereas EQH-PA's P/E ratio is 5.45. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EQH-PA's ROE of -1.52%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is more volatile compared to EQH-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.Check EQH-PA's competition here
BRK-A vs UNMA Comparison February 2026
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, UNMA has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $746,100.00, while UNMA trades at $23.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 15.92, whereas UNMA's P/E ratio is 4.91. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to UNMA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is more volatile compared to UNMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.Check UNMA's competition here
BRK-A vs ESGRP Comparison February 2026
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, ESGRP has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $746,100.00, while ESGRP trades at $20.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 15.92, whereas ESGRP's P/E ratio is -13.72. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ESGRP's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is more volatile compared to ESGRP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.Check ESGRP's competition here
BRK-A vs ATH-PE Comparison February 2026
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, ATH-PE has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $746,100.00, while ATH-PE trades at $26.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 15.92, whereas ATH-PE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ATH-PE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is more volatile compared to ATH-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.Check ATH-PE's competition here
BRK-A vs ATH-PC Comparison February 2026
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, ATH-PC has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $746,100.00, while ATH-PC trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 15.92, whereas ATH-PC's P/E ratio is 3.14. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ATH-PC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is more volatile compared to ATH-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.Check ATH-PC's competition here
BRK-A vs ESGR Comparison February 2026
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, ESGR has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $746,100.00, while ESGR trades at $337.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 15.92, whereas ESGR's P/E ratio is 10.83. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ESGR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is more volatile compared to ESGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.Check ESGR's competition here
BRK-A vs ESGRO Comparison February 2026
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, ESGRO has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $746,100.00, while ESGRO trades at $19.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 15.92, whereas ESGRO's P/E ratio is -12.87. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ESGRO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is more volatile compared to ESGRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.Check ESGRO's competition here
BRK-A vs EQH-PC Comparison February 2026
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, EQH-PC has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $746,100.00, while EQH-PC trades at $16.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 15.92, whereas EQH-PC's P/E ratio is 4.41. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EQH-PC's ROE of -1.52%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is less volatile compared to EQH-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.Check EQH-PC's competition here
BRK-A vs ATH-PA Comparison February 2026
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, ATH-PA has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $746,100.00, while ATH-PA trades at $24.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 15.92, whereas ATH-PA's P/E ratio is 3.08. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ATH-PA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is more volatile compared to ATH-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.Check ATH-PA's competition here
BRK-A vs ATH-PB Comparison February 2026
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, ATH-PB has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $746,100.00, while ATH-PB trades at $20.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 15.92, whereas ATH-PB's P/E ratio is 2.54. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ATH-PB's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is less volatile compared to ATH-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.Check ATH-PB's competition here
BRK-A vs CNO-PA Comparison February 2026
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, CNO-PA has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $746,100.00, while CNO-PA trades at $19.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 15.92, whereas CNO-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CNO-PA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is more volatile compared to CNO-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.Check CNO-PA's competition here
BRK-A vs ATH-PD Comparison February 2026
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, ATH-PD has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $746,100.00, while ATH-PD trades at $17.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 15.92, whereas ATH-PD's P/E ratio is 2.17. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ATH-PD's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is less volatile compared to ATH-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.Check ATH-PD's competition here
BRK-A vs FIHL Comparison February 2026
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, FIHL has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $746,100.00, while FIHL trades at $19.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 15.92, whereas FIHL's P/E ratio is -400.70. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FIHL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is less volatile compared to FIHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.Check FIHL's competition here
BRK-A vs RZC Comparison February 2026
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, RZC has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $746,100.00, while RZC trades at $25.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 15.92, whereas RZC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RZC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is more volatile compared to RZC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.Check RZC's competition here
BRK-A vs GSHD Comparison February 2026
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, GSHD has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $746,100.00, while GSHD trades at $43.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 15.92, whereas GSHD's P/E ratio is 42.33. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GSHD's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is less volatile compared to GSHD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.Check GSHD's competition here
BRK-A vs XZO Comparison February 2026
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, XZO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $746,100.00, while XZO trades at $16.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 15.92, whereas XZO's P/E ratio is 19.94. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to XZO's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is less volatile compared to XZO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.Check XZO's competition here
BRK-A vs IGIC Comparison February 2026
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, IGIC has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $746,100.00, while IGIC trades at $25.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 15.92, whereas IGIC's P/E ratio is 9.01. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IGIC's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is less volatile compared to IGIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.Check IGIC's competition here
BRK-A vs AIZN Comparison February 2026
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, AIZN has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $746,100.00, while AIZN trades at $21.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 15.92, whereas AIZN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AIZN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is less volatile compared to AIZN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.Check AIZN's competition here
BRK-A vs ARGD Comparison February 2026
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, ARGD has a market cap of 874.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $746,100.00, while ARGD trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 15.92, whereas ARGD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ARGD's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is more volatile compared to ARGD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.Check ARGD's competition here
BRK-A vs WDH Comparison February 2026
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, WDH has a market cap of 665.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $746,100.00, while WDH trades at $1.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 15.92, whereas WDH's P/E ratio is 9.20. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WDH's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is less volatile compared to WDH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.Check WDH's competition here
BRK-A vs YB Comparison February 2026
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, YB has a market cap of 156.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $746,100.00, while YB trades at $19.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 15.92, whereas YB's P/E ratio is 3.47. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to YB's ROE of +1.89%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is less volatile compared to YB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.Check YB's competition here
BRK-A vs FGNX Comparison February 2026
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, FGNX has a market cap of 59.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $746,100.00, while FGNX trades at $7.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 15.92, whereas FGNX's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FGNX's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is less volatile compared to FGNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.Check FGNX's competition here
BRK-A vs FGFPP Comparison February 2026
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, FGFPP has a market cap of 25.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $746,100.00, while FGFPP trades at $19.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 15.92, whereas FGFPP's P/E ratio is -7.69. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FGFPP's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is less volatile compared to FGFPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.Check FGFPP's competition here
BRK-A vs FGF Comparison February 2026
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, FGF has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $746,100.00, while FGF trades at $3.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 15.92, whereas FGF's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FGF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is less volatile compared to FGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.Check FGF's competition here
BRK-A vs ANAT Comparison February 2026
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, ANAT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $746,100.00, while ANAT trades at $188.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 15.92, whereas ANAT's P/E ratio is 6.73. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ANAT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is more volatile compared to ANAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.Check ANAT's competition here
BRK-A vs IGICW Comparison February 2026
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, IGICW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $746,100.00, while IGICW trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 15.92, whereas IGICW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IGICW's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is less volatile compared to IGICW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.Check IGICW's competition here
BRK-A vs WTREP Comparison February 2026
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, WTREP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $746,100.00, while WTREP trades at $25.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 15.92, whereas WTREP's P/E ratio is 1.35. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WTREP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is more volatile compared to WTREP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.Check WTREP's competition here