Berkshire Hathaway Inc.
Berkshire Hathaway Inc. BRK-A Peers
See (BRK-A) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Insurance - Diversified Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BRK-A | $728,800.00 | +0.00% | 1.1T | 13.05 | $56,282.37 | N/A |
| BRK-B | $485.77 | +0.00% | 1.1T | 13.07 | $37.49 | N/A |
| AIG-PA | $62.68 | +6.02% | 112.5B | 5.48 | $11.44 | +1.92% |
| AEH | $25.67 | +0.00% | 52.5B | 19.37 | $1.33 | N/A |
| AED | $25.52 | +0.00% | 52.2B | 19.26 | $1.33 | N/A |
| AEB | $25.01 | -0.08% | 51.1B | 18.88 | $1.33 | N/A |
| AIG | $85.59 | +0.00% | 49.5B | 20.94 | $4.10 | +1.92% |
| SLF | $66.45 | +0.00% | 37.5B | 16.60 | $4.00 | +3.63% |
| HIG | $126.87 | +0.00% | 36B | 12.62 | $10.03 | +1.60% |
| HIG-PG | $24.81 | +0.00% | 35.8B | 3.41 | $7.30 | +1.60% |
Stock Comparison
BRK-A vs BRK-B Comparison
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, BRK-B has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $728,800.00, while BRK-B trades at $485.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 13.05, whereas BRK-B's P/E ratio is 13.07. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BRK-B's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is less volatile compared to BRK-B. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.
BRK-A vs AIG-PA Comparison
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, AIG-PA has a market cap of 112.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $728,800.00, while AIG-PA trades at $62.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 13.05, whereas AIG-PA's P/E ratio is 5.48. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AIG-PA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is less volatile compared to AIG-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.
BRK-A vs AEH Comparison
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, AEH has a market cap of 52.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $728,800.00, while AEH trades at $25.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 13.05, whereas AEH's P/E ratio is 19.37. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AEH's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is more volatile compared to AEH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.
BRK-A vs AED Comparison
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, AED has a market cap of 52.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $728,800.00, while AED trades at $25.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 13.05, whereas AED's P/E ratio is 19.26. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AED's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is more volatile compared to AED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.
BRK-A vs AEB Comparison
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, AEB has a market cap of 51.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $728,800.00, while AEB trades at $25.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 13.05, whereas AEB's P/E ratio is 18.88. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AEB's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is more volatile compared to AEB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.
BRK-A vs AIG Comparison
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, AIG has a market cap of 49.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $728,800.00, while AIG trades at $85.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 13.05, whereas AIG's P/E ratio is 20.94. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AIG's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is less volatile compared to AIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.
BRK-A vs SLF Comparison
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, SLF has a market cap of 37.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $728,800.00, while SLF trades at $66.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 13.05, whereas SLF's P/E ratio is 16.60. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SLF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is less volatile compared to SLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.
BRK-A vs HIG Comparison
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, HIG has a market cap of 36B. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $728,800.00, while HIG trades at $126.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 13.05, whereas HIG's P/E ratio is 12.62. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HIG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is less volatile compared to HIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.
BRK-A vs HIG-PG Comparison
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, HIG-PG has a market cap of 35.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $728,800.00, while HIG-PG trades at $24.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 13.05, whereas HIG-PG's P/E ratio is 3.41. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HIG-PG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is less volatile compared to HIG-PG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.
BRK-A vs ACGL Comparison
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, ACGL has a market cap of 34.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $728,800.00, while ACGL trades at $91.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 13.05, whereas ACGL's P/E ratio is 9.38. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ACGL's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is less volatile compared to ACGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.
BRK-A vs ACGLO Comparison
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, ACGLO has a market cap of 33.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $728,800.00, while ACGLO trades at $20.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 13.05, whereas ACGLO's P/E ratio is 4.38. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ACGLO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is less volatile compared to ACGLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.
BRK-A vs ATH Comparison
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, ATH has a market cap of 19.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $728,800.00, while ATH trades at $83.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 13.05, whereas ATH's P/E ratio is 4.42. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ATH's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is less volatile compared to ATH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.
BRK-A vs PFG Comparison
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, PFG has a market cap of 18.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $728,800.00, while PFG trades at $79.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 13.05, whereas PFG's P/E ratio is 17.31. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PFG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is more volatile compared to PFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.
BRK-A vs EQH Comparison
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, EQH has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $728,800.00, while EQH trades at $56.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 13.05, whereas EQH's P/E ratio is 15.06. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to EQH's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is less volatile compared to EQH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.
BRK-A vs ACGLP Comparison
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, ACGLP has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $728,800.00, while ACGLP trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 13.05, whereas ACGLP's P/E ratio is 5.03. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ACGLP's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is more volatile compared to ACGLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.
BRK-A vs BNT Comparison
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, BNT has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $728,800.00, while BNT trades at $61.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 13.05, whereas BNT's P/E ratio is 15.21. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BNT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is more volatile compared to BNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.
BRK-A vs UNMA Comparison
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, UNMA has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $728,800.00, while UNMA trades at $22.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 13.05, whereas UNMA's P/E ratio is 4.80. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to UNMA's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is less volatile compared to UNMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.
BRK-A vs AEG Comparison
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, AEG has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $728,800.00, while AEG trades at $7.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 13.05, whereas AEG's P/E ratio is 16.91. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AEG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is less volatile compared to AEG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.
BRK-A vs AIZN Comparison
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, AIZN has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $728,800.00, while AIZN trades at $21.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 13.05, whereas AIZN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AIZN's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is less volatile compared to AIZN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.
BRK-A vs ORI Comparison
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, ORI has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $728,800.00, while ORI trades at $38.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 13.05, whereas ORI's P/E ratio is 12.51. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ORI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is less volatile compared to ORI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.
BRK-A vs ACGLN Comparison
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, ACGLN has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $728,800.00, while ACGLN trades at $16.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 13.05, whereas ACGLN's P/E ratio is 3.59. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ACGLN's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is less volatile compared to ACGLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.
BRK-A vs EQH-PA Comparison
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, EQH-PA has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $728,800.00, while EQH-PA trades at $20.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 13.05, whereas EQH-PA's P/E ratio is 5.41. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to EQH-PA's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is more volatile compared to EQH-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.
BRK-A vs ATH-PE Comparison
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, ATH-PE has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $728,800.00, while ATH-PE trades at $25.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 13.05, whereas ATH-PE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ATH-PE's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is less volatile compared to ATH-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.
BRK-A vs ESGRO Comparison
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, ESGRO has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $728,800.00, while ESGRO trades at $20.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 13.05, whereas ESGRO's P/E ratio is -13.76. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ESGRO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is less volatile compared to ESGRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.
BRK-A vs EQH-PC Comparison
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, EQH-PC has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $728,800.00, while EQH-PC trades at $17.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 13.05, whereas EQH-PC's P/E ratio is 4.44. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to EQH-PC's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is less volatile compared to EQH-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.
BRK-A vs ATH-PC Comparison
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, ATH-PC has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $728,800.00, while ATH-PC trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 13.05, whereas ATH-PC's P/E ratio is 3.14. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ATH-PC's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is more volatile compared to ATH-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.
BRK-A vs ESGRP Comparison
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, ESGRP has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $728,800.00, while ESGRP trades at $20.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 13.05, whereas ESGRP's P/E ratio is -13.80. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ESGRP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is less volatile compared to ESGRP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.
BRK-A vs ESGR Comparison
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, ESGR has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $728,800.00, while ESGR trades at $336.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 13.05, whereas ESGR's P/E ratio is 10.83. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ESGR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is more volatile compared to ESGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.
BRK-A vs ATH-PA Comparison
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, ATH-PA has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $728,800.00, while ATH-PA trades at $24.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 13.05, whereas ATH-PA's P/E ratio is 3.11. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ATH-PA's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is less volatile compared to ATH-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.
BRK-A vs ATH-PB Comparison
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, ATH-PB has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $728,800.00, while ATH-PB trades at $19.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 13.05, whereas ATH-PB's P/E ratio is 2.54. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ATH-PB's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is less volatile compared to ATH-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.
BRK-A vs GSHD Comparison
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, GSHD has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $728,800.00, while GSHD trades at $105.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 13.05, whereas GSHD's P/E ratio is 87.14. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GSHD's ROE of +2.32%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is less volatile compared to GSHD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.
BRK-A vs CNO-PA Comparison
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, CNO-PA has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $728,800.00, while CNO-PA trades at $17.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 13.05, whereas CNO-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CNO-PA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is less volatile compared to CNO-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.
BRK-A vs ATH-PD Comparison
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, ATH-PD has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $728,800.00, while ATH-PD trades at $17.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 13.05, whereas ATH-PD's P/E ratio is 2.17. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ATH-PD's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is less volatile compared to ATH-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.
BRK-A vs FIHL Comparison
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, FIHL has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $728,800.00, while FIHL trades at $16.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 13.05, whereas FIHL's P/E ratio is -187.22. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FIHL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is less volatile compared to FIHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.
BRK-A vs RZC Comparison
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, RZC has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $728,800.00, while RZC trades at $25.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 13.05, whereas RZC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RZC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is less volatile compared to RZC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.
BRK-A vs IGIC Comparison
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, IGIC has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $728,800.00, while IGIC trades at $24.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 13.05, whereas IGIC's P/E ratio is 8.48. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IGIC's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is less volatile compared to IGIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.
BRK-A vs YB Comparison
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, YB has a market cap of 947.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $728,800.00, while YB trades at $21.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 13.05, whereas YB's P/E ratio is 9.96. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to YB's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is less volatile compared to YB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.
BRK-A vs ARGD Comparison
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, ARGD has a market cap of 704.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $728,800.00, while ARGD trades at $20.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 13.05, whereas ARGD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ARGD's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is more volatile compared to ARGD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.
BRK-A vs WDH Comparison
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, WDH has a market cap of 48.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $728,800.00, while WDH trades at $1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 13.05, whereas WDH's P/E ratio is 9.00. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WDH's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is less volatile compared to WDH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.
BRK-A vs FGFPP Comparison
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, FGFPP has a market cap of 21.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $728,800.00, while FGFPP trades at $16.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 13.05, whereas FGFPP's P/E ratio is -6.73. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FGFPP's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is more volatile compared to FGFPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.
BRK-A vs FGF Comparison
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, FGF has a market cap of 21.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $728,800.00, while FGF trades at $16.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 13.05, whereas FGF's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FGF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is less volatile compared to FGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.
BRK-A vs WTREP Comparison
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, WTREP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $728,800.00, while WTREP trades at $25.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 13.05, whereas WTREP's P/E ratio is 1.35. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WTREP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is more volatile compared to WTREP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.
BRK-A vs IGICW Comparison
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, IGICW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $728,800.00, while IGICW trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 13.05, whereas IGICW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IGICW's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is less volatile compared to IGICW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.
BRK-A vs ANAT Comparison
BRK-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRK-A stands at 1.1T. In comparison, ANAT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BRK-A is priced at $728,800.00, while ANAT trades at $188.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRK-A currently has a P/E ratio of 13.05, whereas ANAT's P/E ratio is 6.73. In terms of profitability, BRK-A's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ANAT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BRK-A is more volatile compared to ANAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRK-A.