Bridgestone Corporation
Bridgestone Corporation BRDCF Peers
See (BRDCF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BRDCF | $40.50 | +0.00% | 27.5B | 14.57 | $2.78 | +3.25% |
| FYGGY | $1.50 | +0.00% | 48.1B | 13.64 | $0.11 | +4.11% |
| DNZOF | $12.31 | -12.63% | 38.5B | 13.53 | $1.01 | +3.18% |
| DNZOY | $13.22 | +0.95% | 36.7B | 13.02 | $1.00 | +1.83% |
| MGDDF | $39.16 | +6.64% | 27.6B | 3.51 | $11.17 | +3.98% |
| BRDCY | $20.28 | -1.27% | 27.6B | 14.70 | $1.38 | +2.18% |
| MGDDY | $18.07 | -1.47% | 26B | 8.25 | $2.23 | +4.11% |
| CTTAF | $83.75 | -1.48% | 16.8B | 12.53 | $6.70 | +2.98% |
| CTTAY | $8.26 | -1.99% | 16.6B | 12.36 | $0.67 | +3.43% |
| KNRRY | $24.69 | +0.07% | 15.9B | 32.48 | $0.76 | +2.01% |
Stock Comparison
BRDCF vs FYGGY Comparison
BRDCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRDCF stands at 27.5B. In comparison, FYGGY has a market cap of 48.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BRDCF is priced at $40.50, while FYGGY trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRDCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas FYGGY's P/E ratio is 13.64. In terms of profitability, BRDCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FYGGY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, BRDCF and FYGGY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BRDCF vs DNZOF Comparison
BRDCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRDCF stands at 27.5B. In comparison, DNZOF has a market cap of 38.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BRDCF is priced at $40.50, while DNZOF trades at $12.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRDCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas DNZOF's P/E ratio is 13.53. In terms of profitability, BRDCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DNZOF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BRDCF and DNZOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BRDCF vs DNZOY Comparison
BRDCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRDCF stands at 27.5B. In comparison, DNZOY has a market cap of 36.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BRDCF is priced at $40.50, while DNZOY trades at $13.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRDCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas DNZOY's P/E ratio is 13.02. In terms of profitability, BRDCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DNZOY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BRDCF is less volatile compared to DNZOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRDCF.
BRDCF vs MGDDF Comparison
BRDCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRDCF stands at 27.5B. In comparison, MGDDF has a market cap of 27.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BRDCF is priced at $40.50, while MGDDF trades at $39.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRDCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas MGDDF's P/E ratio is 3.51. In terms of profitability, BRDCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MGDDF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BRDCF and MGDDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BRDCF vs BRDCY Comparison
BRDCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRDCF stands at 27.5B. In comparison, BRDCY has a market cap of 27.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BRDCF is priced at $40.50, while BRDCY trades at $20.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRDCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas BRDCY's P/E ratio is 14.70. In terms of profitability, BRDCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BRDCY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BRDCF is less volatile compared to BRDCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRDCF.
BRDCF vs MGDDY Comparison
BRDCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRDCF stands at 27.5B. In comparison, MGDDY has a market cap of 26B. Regarding current trading prices, BRDCF is priced at $40.50, while MGDDY trades at $18.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRDCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas MGDDY's P/E ratio is 8.25. In terms of profitability, BRDCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MGDDY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BRDCF is less volatile compared to MGDDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRDCF.
BRDCF vs CTTAF Comparison
BRDCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRDCF stands at 27.5B. In comparison, CTTAF has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BRDCF is priced at $40.50, while CTTAF trades at $83.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRDCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas CTTAF's P/E ratio is 12.53. In terms of profitability, BRDCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CTTAF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BRDCF is less volatile compared to CTTAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRDCF.
BRDCF vs CTTAY Comparison
BRDCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRDCF stands at 27.5B. In comparison, CTTAY has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BRDCF is priced at $40.50, while CTTAY trades at $8.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRDCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas CTTAY's P/E ratio is 12.36. In terms of profitability, BRDCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CTTAY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BRDCF is less volatile compared to CTTAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRDCF.
BRDCF vs KNRRY Comparison
BRDCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRDCF stands at 27.5B. In comparison, KNRRY has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BRDCF is priced at $40.50, while KNRRY trades at $24.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRDCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas KNRRY's P/E ratio is 32.48. In terms of profitability, BRDCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KNRRY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BRDCF is less volatile compared to KNRRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRDCF.
BRDCF vs SMTOY Comparison
BRDCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRDCF stands at 27.5B. In comparison, SMTOY has a market cap of 15.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BRDCF is priced at $40.50, while SMTOY trades at $20.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRDCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas SMTOY's P/E ratio is 11.75. In terms of profitability, BRDCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SMTOY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BRDCF is less volatile compared to SMTOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRDCF.
BRDCF vs KNBHF Comparison
BRDCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRDCF stands at 27.5B. In comparison, KNBHF has a market cap of 15.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BRDCF is priced at $40.50, while KNBHF trades at $98.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRDCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas KNBHF's P/E ratio is 31.61. In terms of profitability, BRDCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KNBHF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BRDCF and KNBHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BRDCF vs PTAIF Comparison
BRDCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRDCF stands at 27.5B. In comparison, PTAIF has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BRDCF is priced at $40.50, while PTAIF trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRDCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas PTAIF's P/E ratio is 5.58. In terms of profitability, BRDCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PTAIF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BRDCF is less volatile compared to PTAIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRDCF.
BRDCF vs PTAIY Comparison
BRDCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRDCF stands at 27.5B. In comparison, PTAIY has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BRDCF is priced at $40.50, while PTAIY trades at $5.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRDCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas PTAIY's P/E ratio is 5.64. In terms of profitability, BRDCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PTAIY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BRDCF and PTAIY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BRDCF vs HLLGY Comparison
BRDCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRDCF stands at 27.5B. In comparison, HLLGY has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BRDCF is priced at $40.50, while HLLGY trades at $47.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRDCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas HLLGY's P/E ratio is 29.50. In terms of profitability, BRDCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HLLGY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BRDCF is less volatile compared to HLLGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRDCF.
BRDCF vs HLKHF Comparison
BRDCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRDCF stands at 27.5B. In comparison, HLKHF has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BRDCF is priced at $40.50, while HLKHF trades at $92.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRDCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas HLKHF's P/E ratio is 25.78. In terms of profitability, BRDCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HLKHF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BRDCF is less volatile compared to HLKHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRDCF.
BRDCF vs ASEKY Comparison
BRDCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRDCF stands at 27.5B. In comparison, ASEKY has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BRDCF is priced at $40.50, while ASEKY trades at $12.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRDCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas ASEKY's P/E ratio is 13.16. In terms of profitability, BRDCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ASEKY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BRDCF and ASEKY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BRDCF vs ASEKF Comparison
BRDCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRDCF stands at 27.5B. In comparison, ASEKF has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BRDCF is priced at $40.50, while ASEKF trades at $10.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRDCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas ASEKF's P/E ratio is 10.61. In terms of profitability, BRDCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ASEKF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BRDCF and ASEKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BRDCF vs NGKSY Comparison
BRDCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRDCF stands at 27.5B. In comparison, NGKSY has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BRDCF is priced at $40.50, while NGKSY trades at $17.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRDCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas NGKSY's P/E ratio is 10.71. In terms of profitability, BRDCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NGKSY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BRDCF is less volatile compared to NGKSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRDCF.
BRDCF vs SFFLY Comparison
BRDCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRDCF stands at 27.5B. In comparison, SFFLY has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BRDCF is priced at $40.50, while SFFLY trades at $7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRDCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas SFFLY's P/E ratio is -5.43. In terms of profitability, BRDCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SFFLY's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BRDCF is less volatile compared to SFFLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRDCF.
BRDCF vs PLLIF Comparison
BRDCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRDCF stands at 27.5B. In comparison, PLLIF has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BRDCF is priced at $40.50, while PLLIF trades at $6.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRDCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas PLLIF's P/E ratio is 11.40. In terms of profitability, BRDCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PLLIF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BRDCF is less volatile compared to PLLIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRDCF.
BRDCF vs NGKSF Comparison
BRDCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRDCF stands at 27.5B. In comparison, NGKSF has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, BRDCF is priced at $40.50, while NGKSF trades at $30.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRDCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas NGKSF's P/E ratio is 9.33. In terms of profitability, BRDCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NGKSF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BRDCF is less volatile compared to NGKSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRDCF.
BRDCF vs YORUF Comparison
BRDCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRDCF stands at 27.5B. In comparison, YORUF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, BRDCF is priced at $40.50, while YORUF trades at $25.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRDCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas YORUF's P/E ratio is 8.68. In terms of profitability, BRDCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to YORUF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BRDCF and YORUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BRDCF vs BRBOY Comparison
BRDCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRDCF stands at 27.5B. In comparison, BRBOY has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BRDCF is priced at $40.50, while BRBOY trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRDCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas BRBOY's P/E ratio is 16.51. In terms of profitability, BRDCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BRBOY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BRDCF is less volatile compared to BRBOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRDCF.
BRDCF vs YORUY Comparison
BRDCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRDCF stands at 27.5B. In comparison, YORUY has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BRDCF is priced at $40.50, while YORUY trades at $24.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRDCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas YORUY's P/E ratio is 6.71. In terms of profitability, BRDCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to YORUY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BRDCF is less volatile compared to YORUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRDCF.
BRDCF vs KOTMY Comparison
BRDCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRDCF stands at 27.5B. In comparison, KOTMY has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BRDCF is priced at $40.50, while KOTMY trades at $11.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRDCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas KOTMY's P/E ratio is 10.97. In terms of profitability, BRDCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KOTMY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BRDCF and KOTMY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BRDCF vs SCFLF Comparison
BRDCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRDCF stands at 27.5B. In comparison, SCFLF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BRDCF is priced at $40.50, while SCFLF trades at $4.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRDCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas SCFLF's P/E ratio is 9.60. In terms of profitability, BRDCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SCFLF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BRDCF is less volatile compared to SCFLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRDCF.
BRDCF vs KOTMF Comparison
BRDCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRDCF stands at 27.5B. In comparison, KOTMF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BRDCF is priced at $40.50, while KOTMF trades at $11.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRDCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas KOTMF's P/E ratio is 10.96. In terms of profitability, BRDCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KOTMF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BRDCF is less volatile compared to KOTMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRDCF.
BRDCF vs STAEY Comparison
BRDCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRDCF stands at 27.5B. In comparison, STAEY has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BRDCF is priced at $40.50, while STAEY trades at $11.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRDCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas STAEY's P/E ratio is 15.77. In terms of profitability, BRDCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to STAEY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BRDCF is less volatile compared to STAEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRDCF.
BRDCF vs STAEF Comparison
BRDCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRDCF stands at 27.5B. In comparison, STAEF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, BRDCF is priced at $40.50, while STAEF trades at $20.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRDCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas STAEF's P/E ratio is 14.23. In terms of profitability, BRDCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to STAEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BRDCF and STAEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BRDCF vs SMTUF Comparison
BRDCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRDCF stands at 27.5B. In comparison, SMTUF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BRDCF is priced at $40.50, while SMTUF trades at $11.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRDCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas SMTUF's P/E ratio is -37.30. In terms of profitability, BRDCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SMTUF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BRDCF and SMTUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BRDCF vs MNTHY Comparison
BRDCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRDCF stands at 27.5B. In comparison, MNTHY has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BRDCF is priced at $40.50, while MNTHY trades at $51.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRDCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas MNTHY's P/E ratio is 9.09. In terms of profitability, BRDCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MNTHY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BRDCF is less volatile compared to MNTHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRDCF.
BRDCF vs BRBOF Comparison
BRDCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRDCF stands at 27.5B. In comparison, BRBOF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BRDCF is priced at $40.50, while BRBOF trades at $8.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRDCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas BRBOF's P/E ratio is 10.32. In terms of profitability, BRDCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BRBOF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BRDCF and BRBOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BRDCF vs LIMAF Comparison
BRDCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRDCF stands at 27.5B. In comparison, LIMAF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BRDCF is priced at $40.50, while LIMAF trades at $46.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRDCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas LIMAF's P/E ratio is 14.86. In terms of profitability, BRDCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LIMAF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BRDCF is less volatile compared to LIMAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRDCF.
BRDCF vs VLEEF Comparison
BRDCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRDCF stands at 27.5B. In comparison, VLEEF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BRDCF is priced at $40.50, while VLEEF trades at $10.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRDCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas VLEEF's P/E ratio is 14.28. In terms of profitability, BRDCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VLEEF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BRDCF and VLEEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BRDCF vs VLEEY Comparison
BRDCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRDCF stands at 27.5B. In comparison, VLEEY has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BRDCF is priced at $40.50, while VLEEY trades at $5.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRDCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas VLEEY's P/E ratio is 13.92. In terms of profitability, BRDCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VLEEY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BRDCF and VLEEY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BRDCF vs JELCF Comparison
BRDCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRDCF stands at 27.5B. In comparison, JELCF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BRDCF is priced at $40.50, while JELCF trades at $2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRDCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas JELCF's P/E ratio is 9.64. In terms of profitability, BRDCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to JELCF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BRDCF is less volatile compared to JELCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRDCF.
BRDCF vs NHKGF Comparison
BRDCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRDCF stands at 27.5B. In comparison, NHKGF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BRDCF is priced at $40.50, while NHKGF trades at $11.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRDCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas NHKGF's P/E ratio is 7.60. In terms of profitability, BRDCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NHKGF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BRDCF is less volatile compared to NHKGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRDCF.
BRDCF vs TDBOF Comparison
BRDCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRDCF stands at 27.5B. In comparison, TDBOF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BRDCF is priced at $40.50, while TDBOF trades at $13.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRDCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas TDBOF's P/E ratio is 20.66. In terms of profitability, BRDCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TDBOF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BRDCF is less volatile compared to TDBOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRDCF.
BRDCF vs VTSCF Comparison
BRDCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRDCF stands at 27.5B. In comparison, VTSCF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BRDCF is priced at $40.50, while VTSCF trades at $56.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRDCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas VTSCF's P/E ratio is 82.35. In terms of profitability, BRDCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VTSCF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BRDCF and VTSCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BRDCF vs NIFCY Comparison
BRDCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRDCF stands at 27.5B. In comparison, NIFCY has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BRDCF is priced at $40.50, while NIFCY trades at $12.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRDCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas NIFCY's P/E ratio is 22.72. In terms of profitability, BRDCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NIFCY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BRDCF is less volatile compared to NIFCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRDCF.
BRDCF vs MNTHF Comparison
BRDCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRDCF stands at 27.5B. In comparison, MNTHF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BRDCF is priced at $40.50, while MNTHF trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRDCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas MNTHF's P/E ratio is 7.14. In terms of profitability, BRDCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MNTHF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BRDCF and MNTHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BRDCF vs NPSKF Comparison
BRDCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRDCF stands at 27.5B. In comparison, NPSKF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BRDCF is priced at $40.50, while NPSKF trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRDCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas NPSKF's P/E ratio is 32.14. In terms of profitability, BRDCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NPSKF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BRDCF is less volatile compared to NPSKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRDCF.
BRDCF vs NPSKY Comparison
BRDCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRDCF stands at 27.5B. In comparison, NPSKY has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BRDCF is priced at $40.50, while NPSKY trades at $8.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRDCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas NPSKY's P/E ratio is 25.66. In terms of profitability, BRDCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NPSKY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BRDCF is less volatile compared to NPSKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRDCF.
BRDCF vs TGOSY Comparison
BRDCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRDCF stands at 27.5B. In comparison, TGOSY has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BRDCF is priced at $40.50, while TGOSY trades at $33.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRDCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas TGOSY's P/E ratio is 8.34. In terms of profitability, BRDCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TGOSY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BRDCF is less volatile compared to TGOSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRDCF.
BRDCF vs ARBFF Comparison
BRDCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRDCF stands at 27.5B. In comparison, ARBFF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BRDCF is priced at $40.50, while ARBFF trades at $24.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRDCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas ARBFF's P/E ratio is 31.15. In terms of profitability, BRDCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ARBFF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BRDCF is less volatile compared to ARBFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRDCF.
BRDCF vs JEHLY Comparison
BRDCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRDCF stands at 27.5B. In comparison, JEHLY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BRDCF is priced at $40.50, while JEHLY trades at $20.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRDCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas JEHLY's P/E ratio is 7.27. In terms of profitability, BRDCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to JEHLY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BRDCF and JEHLY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BRDCF vs FURCF Comparison
BRDCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRDCF stands at 27.5B. In comparison, FURCF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BRDCF is priced at $40.50, while FURCF trades at $9.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRDCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas FURCF's P/E ratio is -8.64. In terms of profitability, BRDCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FURCF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BRDCF is less volatile compared to FURCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRDCF.
BRDCF vs MBUMY Comparison
BRDCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRDCF stands at 27.5B. In comparison, MBUMY has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BRDCF is priced at $40.50, while MBUMY trades at $7.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRDCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas MBUMY's P/E ratio is 27.98. In terms of profitability, BRDCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MBUMY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BRDCF and MBUMY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BRDCF vs MBUMF Comparison
BRDCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRDCF stands at 27.5B. In comparison, MBUMF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BRDCF is priced at $40.50, while MBUMF trades at $13.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRDCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas MBUMF's P/E ratio is 18.65. In terms of profitability, BRDCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MBUMF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BRDCF is less volatile compared to MBUMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRDCF.
BRDCF vs GMPUF Comparison
BRDCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRDCF stands at 27.5B. In comparison, GMPUF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BRDCF is priced at $40.50, while GMPUF trades at $2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRDCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas GMPUF's P/E ratio is 9.22. In terms of profitability, BRDCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GMPUF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BRDCF and GMPUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BRDCF vs UNIEF Comparison
BRDCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRDCF stands at 27.5B. In comparison, UNIEF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BRDCF is priced at $40.50, while UNIEF trades at $35.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRDCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas UNIEF's P/E ratio is 24.13. In terms of profitability, BRDCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to UNIEF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BRDCF is less volatile compared to UNIEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRDCF.
BRDCF vs NTXVF Comparison
BRDCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRDCF stands at 27.5B. In comparison, NTXVF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BRDCF is priced at $40.50, while NTXVF trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRDCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas NTXVF's P/E ratio is 31.40. In terms of profitability, BRDCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NTXVF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BRDCF is less volatile compared to NTXVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRDCF.
BRDCF vs FAURY Comparison
BRDCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRDCF stands at 27.5B. In comparison, FAURY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BRDCF is priced at $40.50, while FAURY trades at $1.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRDCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas FAURY's P/E ratio is -7.15. In terms of profitability, BRDCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FAURY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BRDCF and FAURY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BRDCF vs PASTF Comparison
BRDCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRDCF stands at 27.5B. In comparison, PASTF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BRDCF is priced at $40.50, while PASTF trades at $9.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRDCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas PASTF's P/E ratio is 8.05. In terms of profitability, BRDCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PASTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BRDCF is less volatile compared to PASTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRDCF.
BRDCF vs NKRKY Comparison
BRDCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRDCF stands at 27.5B. In comparison, NKRKY has a market cap of 962.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BRDCF is priced at $40.50, while NKRKY trades at $3.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRDCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas NKRKY's P/E ratio is -23.27. In terms of profitability, BRDCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NKRKY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BRDCF and NKRKY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BRDCF vs NKRKF Comparison
BRDCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRDCF stands at 27.5B. In comparison, NKRKF has a market cap of 958.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BRDCF is priced at $40.50, while NKRKF trades at $6.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRDCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas NKRKF's P/E ratio is -23.18. In terms of profitability, BRDCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NKRKF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BRDCF is less volatile compared to NKRKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRDCF.
BRDCF vs TIANF Comparison
BRDCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRDCF stands at 27.5B. In comparison, TIANF has a market cap of 939.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BRDCF is priced at $40.50, while TIANF trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRDCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas TIANF's P/E ratio is 3.79. In terms of profitability, BRDCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TIANF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BRDCF is less volatile compared to TIANF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRDCF.
BRDCF vs SFHLF Comparison
BRDCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRDCF stands at 27.5B. In comparison, SFHLF has a market cap of 817.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BRDCF is priced at $40.50, while SFHLF trades at $18.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRDCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas SFHLF's P/E ratio is 11.12. In terms of profitability, BRDCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SFHLF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BRDCF is less volatile compared to SFHLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRDCF.
BRDCF vs GUDDY Comparison
BRDCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRDCF stands at 27.5B. In comparison, GUDDY has a market cap of 777.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BRDCF is priced at $40.50, while GUDDY trades at $11.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRDCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas GUDDY's P/E ratio is 25.42. In terms of profitability, BRDCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GUDDY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BRDCF and GUDDY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BRDCF vs ATNNF Comparison
BRDCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRDCF stands at 27.5B. In comparison, ATNNF has a market cap of 775.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BRDCF is priced at $40.50, while ATNNF trades at $133.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRDCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas ATNNF's P/E ratio is 12.84. In terms of profitability, BRDCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ATNNF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BRDCF is less volatile compared to ATNNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRDCF.
BRDCF vs ABDDF Comparison
BRDCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRDCF stands at 27.5B. In comparison, ABDDF has a market cap of 757.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BRDCF is priced at $40.50, while ABDDF trades at $33.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRDCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas ABDDF's P/E ratio is 143.48. In terms of profitability, BRDCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ABDDF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BRDCF and ABDDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BRDCF vs GUDHF Comparison
BRDCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRDCF stands at 27.5B. In comparison, GUDHF has a market cap of 693.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BRDCF is priced at $40.50, while GUDHF trades at $5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRDCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas GUDHF's P/E ratio is 13.78. In terms of profitability, BRDCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GUDHF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BRDCF is less volatile compared to GUDHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRDCF.
BRDCF vs NMAKF Comparison
BRDCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRDCF stands at 27.5B. In comparison, NMAKF has a market cap of 511.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BRDCF is priced at $40.50, while NMAKF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRDCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas NMAKF's P/E ratio is -17.50. In terms of profitability, BRDCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NMAKF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BRDCF is less volatile compared to NMAKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRDCF.
BRDCF vs FCVFF Comparison
BRDCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRDCF stands at 27.5B. In comparison, FCVFF has a market cap of 509.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BRDCF is priced at $40.50, while FCVFF trades at $10.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRDCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas FCVFF's P/E ratio is 9.33. In terms of profitability, BRDCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FCVFF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BRDCF and FCVFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BRDCF vs MRETF Comparison
BRDCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRDCF stands at 27.5B. In comparison, MRETF has a market cap of 449.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BRDCF is priced at $40.50, while MRETF trades at $6.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRDCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas MRETF's P/E ratio is -10.84. In terms of profitability, BRDCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MRETF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BRDCF and MRETF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BRDCF vs TCISF Comparison
BRDCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRDCF stands at 27.5B. In comparison, TCISF has a market cap of 420M. Regarding current trading prices, BRDCF is priced at $40.50, while TCISF trades at $12.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRDCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas TCISF's P/E ratio is 9.35. In terms of profitability, BRDCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TCISF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BRDCF and TCISF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BRDCF vs SAEOF Comparison
BRDCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRDCF stands at 27.5B. In comparison, SAEOF has a market cap of 401.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BRDCF is priced at $40.50, while SAEOF trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRDCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas SAEOF's P/E ratio is -0.41. In terms of profitability, BRDCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SAEOF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BRDCF and SAEOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BRDCF vs VTSCY Comparison
BRDCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRDCF stands at 27.5B. In comparison, VTSCY has a market cap of 400.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BRDCF is priced at $40.50, while VTSCY trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRDCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas VTSCY's P/E ratio is 76.92. In terms of profitability, BRDCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VTSCY's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BRDCF and VTSCY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BRDCF vs PWRHF Comparison
BRDCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRDCF stands at 27.5B. In comparison, PWRHF has a market cap of 371.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BRDCF is priced at $40.50, while PWRHF trades at $3.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRDCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas PWRHF's P/E ratio is 23.06. In terms of profitability, BRDCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PWRHF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, BRDCF is less volatile compared to PWRHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRDCF.
BRDCF vs ELLRY Comparison
BRDCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRDCF stands at 27.5B. In comparison, ELLRY has a market cap of 335.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BRDCF is priced at $40.50, while ELLRY trades at $2.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRDCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas ELLRY's P/E ratio is -1.98. In terms of profitability, BRDCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ELLRY's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BRDCF and ELLRY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BRDCF vs AMGRF Comparison
BRDCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRDCF stands at 27.5B. In comparison, AMGRF has a market cap of 325.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BRDCF is priced at $40.50, while AMGRF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRDCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas AMGRF's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, BRDCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AMGRF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BRDCF is less volatile compared to AMGRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRDCF.
BRDCF vs EGKLF Comparison
BRDCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRDCF stands at 27.5B. In comparison, EGKLF has a market cap of 302.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BRDCF is priced at $40.50, while EGKLF trades at $4.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRDCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas EGKLF's P/E ratio is -1.81. In terms of profitability, BRDCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EGKLF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BRDCF is less volatile compared to EGKLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRDCF.
BRDCF vs NPSGF Comparison
BRDCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRDCF stands at 27.5B. In comparison, NPSGF has a market cap of 294.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BRDCF is priced at $40.50, while NPSGF trades at $3.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRDCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas NPSGF's P/E ratio is 6.31. In terms of profitability, BRDCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NPSGF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BRDCF is less volatile compared to NPSGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRDCF.
BRDCF vs IOCJY Comparison
BRDCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRDCF stands at 27.5B. In comparison, IOCJY has a market cap of 247.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BRDCF is priced at $40.50, while IOCJY trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRDCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas IOCJY's P/E ratio is 6.11. In terms of profitability, BRDCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IOCJY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BRDCF and IOCJY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BRDCF vs NPSGY Comparison
BRDCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRDCF stands at 27.5B. In comparison, NPSGY has a market cap of 245.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BRDCF is priced at $40.50, while NPSGY trades at $2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRDCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas NPSGY's P/E ratio is -1.81. In terms of profitability, BRDCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NPSGY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BRDCF is less volatile compared to NPSGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRDCF.
BRDCF vs XNGIF Comparison
BRDCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRDCF stands at 27.5B. In comparison, XNGIF has a market cap of 244.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BRDCF is priced at $40.50, while XNGIF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRDCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas XNGIF's P/E ratio is 6.43. In terms of profitability, BRDCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to XNGIF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BRDCF and XNGIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BRDCF vs AKBIF Comparison
BRDCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRDCF stands at 27.5B. In comparison, AKBIF has a market cap of 192.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BRDCF is priced at $40.50, while AKBIF trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRDCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas AKBIF's P/E ratio is 10.14. In terms of profitability, BRDCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AKBIF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BRDCF is less volatile compared to AKBIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRDCF.
BRDCF vs EXCOF Comparison
BRDCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRDCF stands at 27.5B. In comparison, EXCOF has a market cap of 190.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BRDCF is priced at $40.50, while EXCOF trades at $4.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRDCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas EXCOF's P/E ratio is 9.96. In terms of profitability, BRDCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EXCOF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BRDCF and EXCOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BRDCF vs WLMTF Comparison
BRDCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRDCF stands at 27.5B. In comparison, WLMTF has a market cap of 164.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BRDCF is priced at $40.50, while WLMTF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRDCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas WLMTF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BRDCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WLMTF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BRDCF and WLMTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BRDCF vs SCTH Comparison
BRDCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRDCF stands at 27.5B. In comparison, SCTH has a market cap of 163.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BRDCF is priced at $40.50, while SCTH trades at $4.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRDCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas SCTH's P/E ratio is -464.00. In terms of profitability, BRDCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SCTH's ROE of +1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BRDCF and SCTH have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BRDCF vs HWAFF Comparison
BRDCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRDCF stands at 27.5B. In comparison, HWAFF has a market cap of 158M. Regarding current trading prices, BRDCF is priced at $40.50, while HWAFF trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRDCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas HWAFF's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, BRDCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HWAFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BRDCF and HWAFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BRDCF vs KGAUF Comparison
BRDCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRDCF stands at 27.5B. In comparison, KGAUF has a market cap of 148.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BRDCF is priced at $40.50, while KGAUF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRDCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas KGAUF's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, BRDCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KGAUF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BRDCF is less volatile compared to KGAUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRDCF.
BRDCF vs FESTF Comparison
BRDCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRDCF stands at 27.5B. In comparison, FESTF has a market cap of 101.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BRDCF is priced at $40.50, while FESTF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRDCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas FESTF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BRDCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FESTF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BRDCF is less volatile compared to FESTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRDCF.
BRDCF vs CAOHF Comparison
BRDCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRDCF stands at 27.5B. In comparison, CAOHF has a market cap of 61.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BRDCF is priced at $40.50, while CAOHF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRDCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas CAOHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BRDCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CAOHF's ROE of -14.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BRDCF and CAOHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BRDCF vs LEAT Comparison
BRDCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRDCF stands at 27.5B. In comparison, LEAT has a market cap of 56M. Regarding current trading prices, BRDCF is priced at $40.50, while LEAT trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRDCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas LEAT's P/E ratio is -180.00. In terms of profitability, BRDCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LEAT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BRDCF is less volatile compared to LEAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRDCF.
BRDCF vs STSGF Comparison
BRDCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRDCF stands at 27.5B. In comparison, STSGF has a market cap of 38.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BRDCF is priced at $40.50, while STSGF trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRDCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas STSGF's P/E ratio is 19.36. In terms of profitability, BRDCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to STSGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BRDCF and STSGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BRDCF vs NWFAF Comparison
BRDCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRDCF stands at 27.5B. In comparison, NWFAF has a market cap of 37.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BRDCF is priced at $40.50, while NWFAF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRDCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas NWFAF's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, BRDCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NWFAF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BRDCF and NWFAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BRDCF vs NFGRF Comparison
BRDCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRDCF stands at 27.5B. In comparison, NFGRF has a market cap of 33.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BRDCF is priced at $40.50, while NFGRF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRDCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas NFGRF's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, BRDCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NFGRF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BRDCF is less volatile compared to NFGRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRDCF.
BRDCF vs VOAXF Comparison
BRDCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRDCF stands at 27.5B. In comparison, VOAXF has a market cap of 27M. Regarding current trading prices, BRDCF is priced at $40.50, while VOAXF trades at $1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRDCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas VOAXF's P/E ratio is -3.07. In terms of profitability, BRDCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VOAXF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BRDCF and VOAXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BRDCF vs CREVF Comparison
BRDCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRDCF stands at 27.5B. In comparison, CREVF has a market cap of 23.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BRDCF is priced at $40.50, while CREVF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRDCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas CREVF's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, BRDCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CREVF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, BRDCF and CREVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BRDCF vs CCEGF Comparison
BRDCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRDCF stands at 27.5B. In comparison, CCEGF has a market cap of 20.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BRDCF is priced at $40.50, while CCEGF trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRDCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas CCEGF's P/E ratio is -9.33. In terms of profitability, BRDCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CCEGF's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, BRDCF is less volatile compared to CCEGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRDCF.
BRDCF vs CMMCF Comparison
BRDCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRDCF stands at 27.5B. In comparison, CMMCF has a market cap of 13.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BRDCF is priced at $40.50, while CMMCF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRDCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas CMMCF's P/E ratio is -0.95. In terms of profitability, BRDCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CMMCF's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BRDCF is less volatile compared to CMMCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRDCF.
BRDCF vs ATHHF Comparison
BRDCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRDCF stands at 27.5B. In comparison, ATHHF has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BRDCF is priced at $40.50, while ATHHF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRDCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas ATHHF's P/E ratio is -6.80. In terms of profitability, BRDCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ATHHF's ROE of +1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, BRDCF and ATHHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BRDCF vs UFMG Comparison
BRDCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRDCF stands at 27.5B. In comparison, UFMG has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BRDCF is priced at $40.50, while UFMG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRDCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas UFMG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BRDCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to UFMG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BRDCF and UFMG have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BRDCF vs AFFL Comparison
BRDCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRDCF stands at 27.5B. In comparison, AFFL has a market cap of 4.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BRDCF is priced at $40.50, while AFFL trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRDCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas AFFL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, BRDCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AFFL's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, BRDCF is less volatile compared to AFFL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRDCF.
BRDCF vs OPTI Comparison
BRDCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRDCF stands at 27.5B. In comparison, OPTI has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BRDCF is priced at $40.50, while OPTI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRDCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas OPTI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, BRDCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to OPTI's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, BRDCF is less volatile compared to OPTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRDCF.
BRDCF vs AMTY Comparison
BRDCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRDCF stands at 27.5B. In comparison, AMTY has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BRDCF is priced at $40.50, while AMTY trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRDCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas AMTY's P/E ratio is 3.13. In terms of profitability, BRDCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AMTY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BRDCF is less volatile compared to AMTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRDCF.
BRDCF vs SPKTF Comparison
BRDCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRDCF stands at 27.5B. In comparison, SPKTF has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BRDCF is priced at $40.50, while SPKTF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRDCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas SPKTF's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, BRDCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SPKTF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BRDCF and SPKTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BRDCF vs CDTI Comparison
BRDCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRDCF stands at 27.5B. In comparison, CDTI has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BRDCF is priced at $40.50, while CDTI trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRDCF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.57, whereas CDTI's P/E ratio is -0.56. In terms of profitability, BRDCF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CDTI's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BRDCF and CDTI have similar daily volatility (0.00).