BoxScore Brands, Inc.
BoxScore Brands, Inc. BOXS Peers
See (BOXS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BOXS | $0.01 | N/A | 21.6M | -0.65 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| BHPLF | $24.27 | -3.51% | 123.2B | 10.83 | $2.24 | +5.11% |
| RTNTF | $71.23 | -1.06% | 117.2B | 10.08 | $7.07 | +3.30% |
| RTPPF | $59.46 | +2.18% | 101.3B | 8.41 | $7.07 | +6.76% |
| GLCNF | $3.87 | -1.53% | 46.1B | -29.77 | -$0.13 | +2.97% |
| GLNCY | $7.72 | -2.14% | 46.1B | -28.59 | -$0.27 | +2.78% |
| GMBXF | $5.75 | +2.13% | 44.8B | 11.98 | $0.48 | +4.37% |
| AAUKF | $31.15 | +2.87% | 43B | -10.85 | -$2.87 | +2.04% |
| NGLOY | $15.43 | +2.23% | 32.9B | -10.71 | -$1.44 | +1.86% |
| FSUMF | $10.55 | +3.43% | 32.4B | 8.31 | $1.27 | +8.39% |
Stock Comparison
BOXS vs BHPLF Comparison
BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.6M. In comparison, BHPLF has a market cap of 123.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while BHPLF trades at $24.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas BHPLF's P/E ratio is 10.83. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +0.66%, compared to BHPLF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS and BHPLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BOXS vs RTNTF Comparison
BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.6M. In comparison, RTNTF has a market cap of 117.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while RTNTF trades at $71.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas RTNTF's P/E ratio is 10.08. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +0.66%, compared to RTNTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to RTNTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.
BOXS vs RTPPF Comparison
BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.6M. In comparison, RTPPF has a market cap of 101.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while RTPPF trades at $59.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas RTPPF's P/E ratio is 8.41. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +0.66%, compared to RTPPF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS and RTPPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BOXS vs GLCNF Comparison
BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.6M. In comparison, GLCNF has a market cap of 46.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while GLCNF trades at $3.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas GLCNF's P/E ratio is -29.77. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +0.66%, compared to GLCNF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS and GLCNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BOXS vs GLNCY Comparison
BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.6M. In comparison, GLNCY has a market cap of 46.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while GLNCY trades at $7.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas GLNCY's P/E ratio is -28.59. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +0.66%, compared to GLNCY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to GLNCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.
BOXS vs GMBXF Comparison
BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.6M. In comparison, GMBXF has a market cap of 44.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while GMBXF trades at $5.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas GMBXF's P/E ratio is 11.98. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +0.66%, compared to GMBXF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to GMBXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.
BOXS vs AAUKF Comparison
BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.6M. In comparison, AAUKF has a market cap of 43B. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while AAUKF trades at $31.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas AAUKF's P/E ratio is -10.85. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +0.66%, compared to AAUKF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to AAUKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.
BOXS vs NGLOY Comparison
BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.6M. In comparison, NGLOY has a market cap of 32.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while NGLOY trades at $15.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas NGLOY's P/E ratio is -10.71. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +0.66%, compared to NGLOY's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to NGLOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.
BOXS vs FSUMF Comparison
BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.6M. In comparison, FSUMF has a market cap of 32.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while FSUMF trades at $10.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas FSUMF's P/E ratio is 8.31. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +0.66%, compared to FSUMF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to FSUMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.
BOXS vs FSUGY Comparison
BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.6M. In comparison, FSUGY has a market cap of 31.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while FSUGY trades at $20.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas FSUGY's P/E ratio is 8.05. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +0.66%, compared to FSUGY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to FSUGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.
BOXS vs CMCLF Comparison
BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.6M. In comparison, CMCLF has a market cap of 21B. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while CMCLF trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas CMCLF's P/E ratio is 8.40. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +0.66%, compared to CMCLF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to CMCLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.
BOXS vs TCKRF Comparison
BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.6M. In comparison, TCKRF has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while TCKRF trades at $33.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas TCKRF's P/E ratio is 676.80. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +0.66%, compared to TCKRF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to TCKRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.
BOXS vs IVPAF Comparison
BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.6M. In comparison, IVPAF has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while IVPAF trades at $8.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas IVPAF's P/E ratio is 25.56. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +0.66%, compared to IVPAF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to IVPAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.
BOXS vs IPOAF Comparison
BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.6M. In comparison, IPOAF has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while IPOAF trades at $25.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas IPOAF's P/E ratio is 34.00. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +0.66%, compared to IPOAF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to IPOAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.
BOXS vs BOLIF Comparison
BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.6M. In comparison, BOLIF has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while BOLIF trades at $34.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas BOLIF's P/E ratio is 9.39. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +0.66%, compared to BOLIF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS and BOLIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BOXS vs BDNNY Comparison
BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.6M. In comparison, BDNNY has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while BDNNY trades at $63.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas BDNNY's P/E ratio is 7.53. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +0.66%, compared to BDNNY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to BDNNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.
BOXS vs JXMNF Comparison
BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.6M. In comparison, JXMNF has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while JXMNF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas JXMNF's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +0.66%, compared to JXMNF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to JXMNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.
BOXS vs SHTLF Comparison
BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.6M. In comparison, SHTLF has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while SHTLF trades at $1.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas SHTLF's P/E ratio is -35.20. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +0.66%, compared to SHTLF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to SHTLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.
BOXS vs ABML Comparison
BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.6M. In comparison, ABML has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while ABML trades at $9.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas ABML's P/E ratio is -22.34. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +0.66%, compared to ABML's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to ABML. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.
BOXS vs STMNF Comparison
BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.6M. In comparison, STMNF has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while STMNF trades at $23.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas STMNF's P/E ratio is 55.95. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +0.66%, compared to STMNF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS and STMNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BOXS vs SMMYY Comparison
BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.6M. In comparison, SMMYY has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while SMMYY trades at $5.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas SMMYY's P/E ratio is 57.70. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +0.66%, compared to SMMYY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to SMMYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.
BOXS vs LYSCF Comparison
BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.6M. In comparison, LYSCF has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while LYSCF trades at $5.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas LYSCF's P/E ratio is 197.33. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +0.66%, compared to LYSCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to LYSCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.
BOXS vs LYSDY Comparison
BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.6M. In comparison, LYSDY has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while LYSDY trades at $5.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas LYSDY's P/E ratio is 196.33. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +0.66%, compared to LYSDY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to LYSDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.
BOXS vs PUTKF Comparison
BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.6M. In comparison, PUTKF has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while PUTKF trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas PUTKF's P/E ratio is 4.52. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +0.66%, compared to PUTKF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS and PUTKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BOXS vs PUTKY Comparison
BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.6M. In comparison, PUTKY has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while PUTKY trades at $26.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas PUTKY's P/E ratio is 4.24. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +0.66%, compared to PUTKY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to PUTKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.
BOXS vs NILSY Comparison
BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.6M. In comparison, NILSY has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while NILSY trades at $3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas NILSY's P/E ratio is 0.63. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +0.66%, compared to NILSY's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS and NILSY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BOXS vs PAEKY Comparison
BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.6M. In comparison, PAEKY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while PAEKY trades at $17.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas PAEKY's P/E ratio is 12.50. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +0.66%, compared to PAEKY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS and PAEKY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BOXS vs MALRY Comparison
BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.6M. In comparison, MALRY has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while MALRY trades at $15.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas MALRY's P/E ratio is -3.86. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +0.66%, compared to MALRY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS and MALRY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BOXS vs MALRF Comparison
BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.6M. In comparison, MALRF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while MALRF trades at $15.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas MALRF's P/E ratio is -3.87. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +0.66%, compared to MALRF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to MALRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.
BOXS vs FLMMF Comparison
BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.6M. In comparison, FLMMF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while FLMMF trades at $22.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas FLMMF's P/E ratio is -30.63. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +0.66%, compared to FLMMF's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to FLMMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.
BOXS vs PILBF Comparison
BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.6M. In comparison, PILBF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while PILBF trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas PILBF's P/E ratio is -84.00. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +0.66%, compared to PILBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to PILBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.
BOXS vs CHZQ Comparison
BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.6M. In comparison, CHZQ has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while CHZQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas CHZQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +0.66%, compared to CHZQ's ROE of +4.40%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS and CHZQ have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BOXS vs NGXXF Comparison
BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.6M. In comparison, NGXXF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while NGXXF trades at $11.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas NGXXF's P/E ratio is -42.61. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +0.66%, compared to NGXXF's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to NGXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.
BOXS vs PTNDY Comparison
BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.6M. In comparison, PTNDY has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while PTNDY trades at $10.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas PTNDY's P/E ratio is 29.19. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +0.66%, compared to PTNDY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS and PTNDY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BOXS vs MIMTF Comparison
BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.6M. In comparison, MIMTF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while MIMTF trades at $15.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas MIMTF's P/E ratio is 5.52. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +0.66%, compared to MIMTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS and MIMTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BOXS vs IPGDF Comparison
BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.6M. In comparison, IPGDF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while IPGDF trades at $2.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas IPGDF's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +0.66%, compared to IPGDF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS and IPGDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BOXS vs NICMF Comparison
BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.6M. In comparison, NICMF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while NICMF trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas NICMF's P/E ratio is -11.73. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +0.66%, compared to NICMF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS and NICMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BOXS vs PTNDF Comparison
BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.6M. In comparison, PTNDF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while PTNDF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas PTNDF's P/E ratio is 19.00. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +0.66%, compared to PTNDF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS and PTNDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BOXS vs IIDDY Comparison
BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.6M. In comparison, IIDDY has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while IIDDY trades at $5.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas IIDDY's P/E ratio is -2.92. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +0.66%, compared to IIDDY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to IIDDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.
BOXS vs AZZVF Comparison
BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.6M. In comparison, AZZVF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while AZZVF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas AZZVF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +0.66%, compared to AZZVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS and AZZVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BOXS vs AFBOF Comparison
BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.6M. In comparison, AFBOF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while AFBOF trades at $9.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas AFBOF's P/E ratio is 9.96. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +0.66%, compared to AFBOF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to AFBOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.
BOXS vs DWMNF Comparison
BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.6M. In comparison, DWMNF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while DWMNF trades at $30.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas DWMNF's P/E ratio is 9.56. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +0.66%, compared to DWMNF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to DWMNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.
BOXS vs SOUHY Comparison
BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.6M. In comparison, SOUHY has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while SOUHY trades at $9.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas SOUHY's P/E ratio is -37.70. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +0.66%, compared to SOUHY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to SOUHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.
BOXS vs ERMAY Comparison
BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.6M. In comparison, ERMAY has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while ERMAY trades at $5.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas ERMAY's P/E ratio is 93.67. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +0.66%, compared to ERMAY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to ERMAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.
BOXS vs ERMAF Comparison
BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.6M. In comparison, ERMAF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while ERMAF trades at $54.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas ERMAF's P/E ratio is 96.07. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +0.66%, compared to ERMAF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to ERMAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.
BOXS vs DETRF Comparison
BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.6M. In comparison, DETRF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while DETRF trades at $2.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas DETRF's P/E ratio is 15.65. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +0.66%, compared to DETRF's ROE of +1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to DETRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.
BOXS vs ADMLF Comparison
BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.6M. In comparison, ADMLF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while ADMLF trades at $3.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas ADMLF's P/E ratio is -14.12. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +0.66%, compared to ADMLF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to ADMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.
BOXS vs ADTLF Comparison
BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.6M. In comparison, ADTLF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while ADTLF trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas ADTLF's P/E ratio is -13.60. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +0.66%, compared to ADTLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS and ADTLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BOXS vs AZRMF Comparison
BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.6M. In comparison, AZRMF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while AZRMF trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas AZRMF's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +0.66%, compared to AZRMF's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS and AZRMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BOXS vs ILKAF Comparison
BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.6M. In comparison, ILKAF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while ILKAF trades at $2.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas ILKAF's P/E ratio is 7.65. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +0.66%, compared to ILKAF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS and ILKAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BOXS vs ILKAY Comparison
BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.6M. In comparison, ILKAY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while ILKAY trades at $12.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas ILKAY's P/E ratio is 7.50. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +0.66%, compared to ILKAY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS and ILKAY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BOXS vs AUSDF Comparison
BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.6M. In comparison, AUSDF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while AUSDF trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas AUSDF's P/E ratio is 19.67. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +0.66%, compared to AUSDF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS and AUSDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BOXS vs MFRVF Comparison
BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.6M. In comparison, MFRVF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while MFRVF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas MFRVF's P/E ratio is -18.00. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +0.66%, compared to MFRVF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to MFRVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.
BOXS vs BQSSF Comparison
BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.6M. In comparison, BQSSF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while BQSSF trades at $2.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas BQSSF's P/E ratio is -63.00. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +0.66%, compared to BQSSF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to BQSSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.
BOXS vs FMCXF Comparison
BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.6M. In comparison, FMCXF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while FMCXF trades at $2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas FMCXF's P/E ratio is -60.07. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +0.66%, compared to FMCXF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to FMCXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.
BOXS vs LINRF Comparison
BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.6M. In comparison, LINRF has a market cap of 989.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while LINRF trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas LINRF's P/E ratio is -40.75. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +0.66%, compared to LINRF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS and LINRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BOXS vs STTSY Comparison
BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.6M. In comparison, STTSY has a market cap of 918.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while STTSY trades at $20.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas STTSY's P/E ratio is 5.82. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +0.66%, compared to STTSY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to STTSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.
BOXS vs ATUSF Comparison
BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.6M. In comparison, ATUSF has a market cap of 913.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while ATUSF trades at $19.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas ATUSF's P/E ratio is 12.56. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +0.66%, compared to ATUSF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to ATUSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.
BOXS vs TAOFF Comparison
BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.6M. In comparison, TAOFF has a market cap of 903.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while TAOFF trades at $2.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas TAOFF's P/E ratio is -23.58. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +0.66%, compared to TAOFF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS and TAOFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BOXS vs AFMJF Comparison
BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.6M. In comparison, AFMJF has a market cap of 759.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while AFMJF trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas AFMJF's P/E ratio is 7.44. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +0.66%, compared to AFMJF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to AFMJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.
BOXS vs AMVMF Comparison
BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.6M. In comparison, AMVMF has a market cap of 693.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while AMVMF trades at $21.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas AMVMF's P/E ratio is -56.58. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +0.66%, compared to AMVMF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS and AMVMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BOXS vs ALMTF Comparison
BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.6M. In comparison, ALMTF has a market cap of 654.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while ALMTF trades at $2.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas ALMTF's P/E ratio is -18.92. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +0.66%, compared to ALMTF's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to ALMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.
BOXS vs CTJHF Comparison
BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.6M. In comparison, CTJHF has a market cap of 596.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while CTJHF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas CTJHF's P/E ratio is 7.59. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +0.66%, compared to CTJHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to CTJHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.
BOXS vs PXMFF Comparison
BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.6M. In comparison, PXMFF has a market cap of 554.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while PXMFF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas PXMFF's P/E ratio is 4.80. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +0.66%, compared to PXMFF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to PXMFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.
BOXS vs VULNF Comparison
BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.6M. In comparison, VULNF has a market cap of 537.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while VULNF trades at $2.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas VULNF's P/E ratio is -9.46. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +0.66%, compared to VULNF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to VULNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.
BOXS vs MJDLF Comparison
BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.6M. In comparison, MJDLF has a market cap of 496.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while MJDLF trades at $6.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas MJDLF's P/E ratio is 19.58. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +0.66%, compared to MJDLF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS and MJDLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BOXS vs JMXXF Comparison
BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.6M. In comparison, JMXXF has a market cap of 495.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while JMXXF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas JMXXF's P/E ratio is 25.25. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +0.66%, compared to JMXXF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to JMXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.
BOXS vs TTNNF Comparison
BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.6M. In comparison, TTNNF has a market cap of 492.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while TTNNF trades at $6.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas TTNNF's P/E ratio is 13.83. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +0.66%, compared to TTNNF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to TTNNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.
BOXS vs OSTTF Comparison
BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.6M. In comparison, OSTTF has a market cap of 490.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while OSTTF trades at $13.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas OSTTF's P/E ratio is 10.02. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +0.66%, compared to OSTTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to OSTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.
BOXS vs PKREF Comparison
BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.6M. In comparison, PKREF has a market cap of 484M. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while PKREF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas PKREF's P/E ratio is -18.68. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +0.66%, compared to PKREF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to PKREF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.
BOXS vs MCRZF Comparison
BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.6M. In comparison, MCRZF has a market cap of 466.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while MCRZF trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas MCRZF's P/E ratio is -12.29. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +0.66%, compared to MCRZF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to MCRZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.
BOXS vs MCHHF Comparison
BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.6M. In comparison, MCHHF has a market cap of 443.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while MCHHF trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas MCHHF's P/E ratio is 21.00. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +0.66%, compared to MCHHF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to MCHHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.
BOXS vs FGOVF Comparison
BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.6M. In comparison, FGOVF has a market cap of 435.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while FGOVF trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas FGOVF's P/E ratio is -82.37. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +0.66%, compared to FGOVF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to FGOVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.
BOXS vs BIRNF Comparison
BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.6M. In comparison, BIRNF has a market cap of 433.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while BIRNF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas BIRNF's P/E ratio is -7.50. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +0.66%, compared to BIRNF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to BIRNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.
BOXS vs MNXMF Comparison
BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.6M. In comparison, MNXMF has a market cap of 410.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while MNXMF trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas MNXMF's P/E ratio is -71.43. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +0.66%, compared to MNXMF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to MNXMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.
BOXS vs REEMF Comparison
BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.6M. In comparison, REEMF has a market cap of 402.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while REEMF trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas REEMF's P/E ratio is -26.00. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +0.66%, compared to REEMF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to REEMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.
BOXS vs NQMIY Comparison
BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.6M. In comparison, NQMIY has a market cap of 380.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while NQMIY trades at $70.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas NQMIY's P/E ratio is -4.80. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +0.66%, compared to NQMIY's ROE of +0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS and NQMIY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BOXS vs AUMTF Comparison
BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.6M. In comparison, AUMTF has a market cap of 372.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while AUMTF trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas AUMTF's P/E ratio is 22.00. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +0.66%, compared to AUMTF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS and AUMTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BOXS vs CTJHY Comparison
BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.6M. In comparison, CTJHY has a market cap of 353.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while CTJHY trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas CTJHY's P/E ratio is 4.84. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +0.66%, compared to CTJHY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to CTJHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.
BOXS vs CGMLF Comparison
BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.6M. In comparison, CGMLF has a market cap of 346.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while CGMLF trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas CGMLF's P/E ratio is -22.25. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +0.66%, compared to CGMLF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to CGMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.
BOXS vs FWEDF Comparison
BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.6M. In comparison, FWEDF has a market cap of 337.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while FWEDF trades at $1.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas FWEDF's P/E ratio is -10.93. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +0.66%, compared to FWEDF's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to FWEDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.
BOXS vs KMRPF Comparison
BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.6M. In comparison, KMRPF has a market cap of 335.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while KMRPF trades at $3.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas KMRPF's P/E ratio is 5.34. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +0.66%, compared to KMRPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to KMRPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.
BOXS vs MLYF Comparison
BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.6M. In comparison, MLYF has a market cap of 333.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while MLYF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas MLYF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +0.66%, compared to MLYF's ROE of +5.32%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to MLYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.
BOXS vs SVMLF Comparison
BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.6M. In comparison, SVMLF has a market cap of 317M. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while SVMLF trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas SVMLF's P/E ratio is -16.33. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +0.66%, compared to SVMLF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to SVMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.
BOXS vs ERLFF Comparison
BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.6M. In comparison, ERLFF has a market cap of 305.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while ERLFF trades at $1.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas ERLFF's P/E ratio is -29.50. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +0.66%, compared to ERLFF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to ERLFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.
BOXS vs MLXEF Comparison
BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.6M. In comparison, MLXEF has a market cap of 302.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while MLXEF trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas MLXEF's P/E ratio is 4.87. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +0.66%, compared to MLXEF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to MLXEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.
BOXS vs ARAFF Comparison
BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.6M. In comparison, ARAFF has a market cap of 295.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while ARAFF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas ARAFF's P/E ratio is -11.98. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +0.66%, compared to ARAFF's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to ARAFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.
BOXS vs SLGGF Comparison
BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.6M. In comparison, SLGGF has a market cap of 276.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while SLGGF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas SLGGF's P/E ratio is -4.60. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +0.66%, compared to SLGGF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to SLGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.
BOXS vs BSSMF Comparison
BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.6M. In comparison, BSSMF has a market cap of 274.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while BSSMF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas BSSMF's P/E ratio is -100.00. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +0.66%, compared to BSSMF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS and BSSMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BOXS vs LTSRF Comparison
BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.6M. In comparison, LTSRF has a market cap of 274.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while LTSRF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas LTSRF's P/E ratio is -11.57. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +0.66%, compared to LTSRF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to LTSRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.
BOXS vs ERDCF Comparison
BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.6M. In comparison, ERDCF has a market cap of 267.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while ERDCF trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas ERDCF's P/E ratio is -73.40. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +0.66%, compared to ERDCF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to ERDCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.
BOXS vs PMETF Comparison
BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.6M. In comparison, PMETF has a market cap of 264.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while PMETF trades at $1.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas PMETF's P/E ratio is -54.35. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +0.66%, compared to PMETF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to PMETF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.
BOXS vs LRSRF Comparison
BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.6M. In comparison, LRSRF has a market cap of 260.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while LRSRF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas LRSRF's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +0.66%, compared to LRSRF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to LRSRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.
BOXS vs STQNF Comparison
BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.6M. In comparison, STQNF has a market cap of 251.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while STQNF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas STQNF's P/E ratio is -17.20. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +0.66%, compared to STQNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS and STQNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BOXS vs MMILF Comparison
BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.6M. In comparison, MMILF has a market cap of 243.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while MMILF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas MMILF's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +0.66%, compared to MMILF's ROE of -2.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS and MMILF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BOXS vs RXRLF Comparison
BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.6M. In comparison, RXRLF has a market cap of 238.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while RXRLF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas RXRLF's P/E ratio is -29.90. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +0.66%, compared to RXRLF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to RXRLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.
BOXS vs LTHHF Comparison
BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.6M. In comparison, LTHHF has a market cap of 238.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while LTHHF trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas LTHHF's P/E ratio is -16.02. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +0.66%, compared to LTHHF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS and LTHHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BOXS vs BSRUF Comparison
BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.6M. In comparison, BSRUF has a market cap of 237.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while BSRUF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas BSRUF's P/E ratio is -5.09. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +0.66%, compared to BSRUF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to BSRUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.
BOXS vs MGMNF Comparison
BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.6M. In comparison, MGMNF has a market cap of 237.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while MGMNF trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas MGMNF's P/E ratio is 24.06. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +0.66%, compared to MGMNF's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to MGMNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.