BoxScore Brands, Inc.

BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.58M. In comparison, BHPLF has a market cap of 128.69B. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while BHPLF trades at $25.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas BHPLF's P/E ratio is 11.32. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +1.10%, compared to BHPLF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to BHPLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.

BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.58M. In comparison, RTNTF has a market cap of 102.59B. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while RTNTF trades at $74.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas RTNTF's P/E ratio is 10.47. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +1.10%, compared to RTNTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to RTNTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.

BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.58M. In comparison, RTPPF has a market cap of 98.96B. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while RTPPF trades at $57.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas RTPPF's P/E ratio is 8.14. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +1.10%, compared to RTPPF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to RTPPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.

BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.58M. In comparison, GLCNF has a market cap of 42.42B. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while GLCNF trades at $3.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas GLCNF's P/E ratio is -27.15. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +1.10%, compared to GLCNF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to GLCNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.

BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.58M. In comparison, GLNCY has a market cap of 42.07B. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while GLNCY trades at $7.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas GLNCY's P/E ratio is -26.93. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +1.10%, compared to GLNCY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to GLNCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.

BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.58M. In comparison, GMBXF has a market cap of 41.65B. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while GMBXF trades at $5.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas GMBXF's P/E ratio is 11.63. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +1.10%, compared to GMBXF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to GMBXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.

BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.58M. In comparison, NGLOY has a market cap of 34.61B. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while NGLOY trades at $14.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas NGLOY's P/E ratio is -11.32. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +1.10%, compared to NGLOY's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to NGLOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.

BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.58M. In comparison, AAUKF has a market cap of 34.00B. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while AAUKF trades at $28.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas AAUKF's P/E ratio is -11.08. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +1.10%, compared to AAUKF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to AAUKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.

BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.58M. In comparison, FSUMF has a market cap of 33.20B. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while FSUMF trades at $10.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas FSUMF's P/E ratio is 8.57. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +1.10%, compared to FSUMF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS and FSUMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.58M. In comparison, FSUGY has a market cap of 32.17B. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while FSUGY trades at $20.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas FSUGY's P/E ratio is 8.27. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +1.10%, compared to FSUGY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to FSUGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.

BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.58M. In comparison, CMCLF has a market cap of 21.11B. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while CMCLF trades at $0.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas CMCLF's P/E ratio is 9.11. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +1.10%, compared to CMCLF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to CMCLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.

BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.58M. In comparison, TCKRF has a market cap of 16.95B. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while TCKRF trades at $33.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas TCKRF's P/E ratio is 676.80. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +1.10%, compared to TCKRF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to TCKRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.

BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.58M. In comparison, IVPAF has a market cap of 13.93B. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while IVPAF trades at $10.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas IVPAF's P/E ratio is 32.18. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +1.10%, compared to IVPAF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to IVPAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.

BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.58M. In comparison, SHTLF has a market cap of 9.54B. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while SHTLF trades at $2.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas SHTLF's P/E ratio is -42.40. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +1.10%, compared to SHTLF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to SHTLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.

BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.58M. In comparison, BOLIF has a market cap of 9.48B. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while BOLIF trades at $34.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas BOLIF's P/E ratio is 9.39. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +1.10%, compared to BOLIF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS and BOLIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.58M. In comparison, BDNNY has a market cap of 9.06B. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while BDNNY trades at $63.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas BDNNY's P/E ratio is 7.62. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +1.10%, compared to BDNNY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to BDNNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.

BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.58M. In comparison, JXMNF has a market cap of 8.74B. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while JXMNF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas JXMNF's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +1.10%, compared to JXMNF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to JXMNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.

BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.58M. In comparison, IPOAF has a market cap of 7.95B. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while IPOAF trades at $20.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas IPOAF's P/E ratio is 111.11. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +1.10%, compared to IPOAF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to IPOAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.

BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.58M. In comparison, ABML has a market cap of 6.69B. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while ABML trades at $9.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas ABML's P/E ratio is -22.34. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +1.10%, compared to ABML's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to ABML. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.

BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.58M. In comparison, SMMYY has a market cap of 6.05B. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while SMMYY trades at $5.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas SMMYY's P/E ratio is 28.95. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +1.10%, compared to SMMYY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to SMMYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.

BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.58M. In comparison, STMNF has a market cap of 5.23B. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while STMNF trades at $19.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas STMNF's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +1.10%, compared to STMNF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS and STMNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.58M. In comparison, PUTKF has a market cap of 5.08B. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while PUTKF trades at $1.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas PUTKF's P/E ratio is 4.67. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +1.10%, compared to PUTKF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS and PUTKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.58M. In comparison, PUTKY has a market cap of 4.78B. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while PUTKY trades at $26.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas PUTKY's P/E ratio is 4.33. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +1.10%, compared to PUTKY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to PUTKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.

BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.58M. In comparison, NILSY has a market cap of 4.62B. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while NILSY trades at $3.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas NILSY's P/E ratio is 0.63. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +1.10%, compared to NILSY's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS and NILSY have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.58M. In comparison, LYSDY has a market cap of 4.53B. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while LYSDY trades at $4.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas LYSDY's P/E ratio is 120.50. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +1.10%, compared to LYSDY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to LYSDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.

BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.58M. In comparison, LYSCF has a market cap of 4.51B. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while LYSCF trades at $4.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas LYSCF's P/E ratio is 120.50. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +1.10%, compared to LYSCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to LYSCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.

BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.58M. In comparison, PAEKY has a market cap of 3.76B. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while PAEKY trades at $15.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas PAEKY's P/E ratio is 17.03. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +1.10%, compared to PAEKY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to PAEKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.

BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.58M. In comparison, PILBF has a market cap of 3.25B. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while PILBF trades at $1.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas PILBF's P/E ratio is -101.00. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +1.10%, compared to PILBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to PILBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.

BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.58M. In comparison, FLMMF has a market cap of 2.99B. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while FLMMF trades at $22.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas FLMMF's P/E ratio is -30.63. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +1.10%, compared to FLMMF's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to FLMMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.

BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.58M. In comparison, MALRY has a market cap of 2.90B. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while MALRY trades at $14.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas MALRY's P/E ratio is -3.67. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +1.10%, compared to MALRY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to MALRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.

BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.58M. In comparison, CHZQ has a market cap of 2.66B. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while CHZQ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas CHZQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +1.10%, compared to CHZQ's ROE of +4.40%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS and CHZQ have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.58M. In comparison, MIMTF has a market cap of 2.07B. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while MIMTF trades at $15.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas MIMTF's P/E ratio is 5.48. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +1.10%, compared to MIMTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to MIMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.

BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.58M. In comparison, IPGDF has a market cap of 2.00B. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while IPGDF trades at $2.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas IPGDF's P/E ratio is -2.91. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +1.10%, compared to IPGDF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS and IPGDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.58M. In comparison, AZZVF has a market cap of 1.97B. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while AZZVF trades at $0.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas AZZVF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +1.10%, compared to AZZVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS and AZZVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.58M. In comparison, MALRF has a market cap of 1.83B. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while MALRF trades at $9.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas MALRF's P/E ratio is -2.33. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +1.10%, compared to MALRF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS and MALRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.58M. In comparison, DWMNF has a market cap of 1.80B. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while DWMNF trades at $30.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas DWMNF's P/E ratio is 9.38. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +1.10%, compared to DWMNF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to DWMNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.

BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.58M. In comparison, IIDDY has a market cap of 1.78B. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while IIDDY trades at $4.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas IIDDY's P/E ratio is -2.58. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +1.10%, compared to IIDDY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to IIDDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.

BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.58M. In comparison, NGXXF has a market cap of 1.77B. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while NGXXF trades at $8.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas NGXXF's P/E ratio is -35.58. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +1.10%, compared to NGXXF's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to NGXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.

BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.58M. In comparison, SOUHY has a market cap of 1.65B. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while SOUHY trades at $9.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas SOUHY's P/E ratio is -35.33. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +1.10%, compared to SOUHY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to SOUHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.

BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.58M. In comparison, ERMAY has a market cap of 1.62B. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while ERMAY trades at $5.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas ERMAY's P/E ratio is 94.67. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +1.10%, compared to ERMAY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to ERMAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.

BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.58M. In comparison, ERMAF has a market cap of 1.57B. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while ERMAF trades at $54.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas ERMAF's P/E ratio is 97.79. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +1.10%, compared to ERMAF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to ERMAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.

BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.58M. In comparison, AFBOF has a market cap of 1.55B. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while AFBOF trades at $7.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas AFBOF's P/E ratio is 8.57. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +1.10%, compared to AFBOF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to AFBOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.

BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.58M. In comparison, PTNDY has a market cap of 1.55B. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while PTNDY trades at $7.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas PTNDY's P/E ratio is 20.36. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +1.10%, compared to PTNDY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to PTNDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.

BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.58M. In comparison, NICMF has a market cap of 1.54B. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while NICMF trades at $0.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas NICMF's P/E ratio is -8.89. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +1.10%, compared to NICMF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to NICMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.

BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.58M. In comparison, PTNDF has a market cap of 1.50B. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while PTNDF trades at $0.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas PTNDF's P/E ratio is 14.25. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +1.10%, compared to PTNDF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to PTNDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.

BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.58M. In comparison, DETRF has a market cap of 1.32B. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while DETRF trades at $2.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas DETRF's P/E ratio is 14.63. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +1.10%, compared to DETRF's ROE of +1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS and DETRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.58M. In comparison, ILKAY has a market cap of 1.20B. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while ILKAY trades at $14.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas ILKAY's P/E ratio is 8.09. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +1.10%, compared to ILKAY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS and ILKAY have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.58M. In comparison, AZRMF has a market cap of 1.12B. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while AZRMF trades at $2.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas AZRMF's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +1.10%, compared to AZRMF's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS and AZRMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.58M. In comparison, LINRF has a market cap of 1.12B. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while LINRF trades at $0.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas LINRF's P/E ratio is -46.00. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +1.10%, compared to LINRF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to LINRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.

BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.58M. In comparison, FMCXF has a market cap of 1.10B. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while FMCXF trades at $2.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas FMCXF's P/E ratio is -65.50. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +1.10%, compared to FMCXF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to FMCXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.

BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.58M. In comparison, ILKAF has a market cap of 1.09B. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while ILKAF trades at $2.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas ILKAF's P/E ratio is 7.29. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +1.10%, compared to ILKAF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to ILKAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.

BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.58M. In comparison, BQSSF has a market cap of 1.04B. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while BQSSF trades at $2.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas BQSSF's P/E ratio is -62.75. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +1.10%, compared to BQSSF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to BQSSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.

BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.58M. In comparison, STTSY has a market cap of 918.42M. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while STTSY trades at $20.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas STTSY's P/E ratio is 5.82. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +1.10%, compared to STTSY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to STTSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.

BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.58M. In comparison, ADTLF has a market cap of 890.86M. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while ADTLF trades at $2.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas ADTLF's P/E ratio is -13.58. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +1.10%, compared to ADTLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to ADTLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.

BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.58M. In comparison, AUSDF has a market cap of 876.26M. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while AUSDF trades at $0.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas AUSDF's P/E ratio is 15.72. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +1.10%, compared to AUSDF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to AUSDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.

BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.58M. In comparison, ATUSF has a market cap of 875.94M. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while ATUSF trades at $18.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas ATUSF's P/E ratio is 12.37. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +1.10%, compared to ATUSF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to ATUSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.

BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.58M. In comparison, JMXXF has a market cap of 862.86M. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while JMXXF trades at $0.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas JMXXF's P/E ratio is 44.00. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +1.10%, compared to JMXXF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to JMXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.

BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.58M. In comparison, AFMJF has a market cap of 818.82M. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while AFMJF trades at $0.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas AFMJF's P/E ratio is 8.02. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +1.10%, compared to AFMJF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to AFMJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.

BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.58M. In comparison, ADMLF has a market cap of 818.35M. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while ADMLF trades at $2.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas ADMLF's P/E ratio is -12.47. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +1.10%, compared to ADMLF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to ADMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.

BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.58M. In comparison, AMVMF has a market cap of 703.47M. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while AMVMF trades at $21.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas AMVMF's P/E ratio is -21.17. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +1.10%, compared to AMVMF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to AMVMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.

BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.58M. In comparison, VULNF has a market cap of 639.67M. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while VULNF trades at $2.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas VULNF's P/E ratio is -11.31. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +1.10%, compared to VULNF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to VULNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.

BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.58M. In comparison, MFRVF has a market cap of 604.58M. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while MFRVF trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas MFRVF's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +1.10%, compared to MFRVF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to MFRVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.

BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.58M. In comparison, CTJHF has a market cap of 596.40M. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while CTJHF trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas CTJHF's P/E ratio is 7.59. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +1.10%, compared to CTJHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to CTJHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.

BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.58M. In comparison, PXMFF has a market cap of 560.89M. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while PXMFF trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas PXMFF's P/E ratio is 4.85. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +1.10%, compared to PXMFF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to PXMFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.

BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.58M. In comparison, TAOFF has a market cap of 539.38M. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while TAOFF trades at $1.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas TAOFF's P/E ratio is -16.90. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +1.10%, compared to TAOFF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to TAOFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.

BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.58M. In comparison, TTNNF has a market cap of 492.10M. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while TTNNF trades at $6.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas TTNNF's P/E ratio is 13.83. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +1.10%, compared to TTNNF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to TTNNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.

BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.58M. In comparison, OSTTF has a market cap of 490.16M. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while OSTTF trades at $13.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas OSTTF's P/E ratio is 7.36. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +1.10%, compared to OSTTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to OSTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.

BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.58M. In comparison, MJDLF has a market cap of 480.43M. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while MJDLF trades at $5.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas MJDLF's P/E ratio is 19.57. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +1.10%, compared to MJDLF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS and MJDLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.58M. In comparison, ALMTF has a market cap of 469.39M. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while ALMTF trades at $1.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas ALMTF's P/E ratio is -41.50. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +1.10%, compared to ALMTF's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to ALMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.

BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.58M. In comparison, MCRZF has a market cap of 466.46M. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while MCRZF trades at $0.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas MCRZF's P/E ratio is -12.29. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +1.10%, compared to MCRZF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to MCRZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.

BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.58M. In comparison, BIRNF has a market cap of 433.13M. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while BIRNF trades at $0.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas BIRNF's P/E ratio is -7.50. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +1.10%, compared to BIRNF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to BIRNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.

BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.58M. In comparison, NQMIY has a market cap of 380.42M. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while NQMIY trades at $70.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas NQMIY's P/E ratio is -4.80. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +1.10%, compared to NQMIY's ROE of +0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS and NQMIY have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.58M. In comparison, REEMF has a market cap of 374.20M. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while REEMF trades at $0.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas REEMF's P/E ratio is -18.12. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +1.10%, compared to REEMF's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to REEMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.

BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.58M. In comparison, FGOVF has a market cap of 369.90M. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while FGOVF trades at $0.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas FGOVF's P/E ratio is -70.00. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +1.10%, compared to FGOVF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to FGOVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.

BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.58M. In comparison, MCHHF has a market cap of 358.96M. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while MCHHF trades at $0.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas MCHHF's P/E ratio is 17.00. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +1.10%, compared to MCHHF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to MCHHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.

BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.58M. In comparison, CTJHY has a market cap of 353.60M. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while CTJHY trades at $9.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas CTJHY's P/E ratio is 4.79. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +1.10%, compared to CTJHY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS and CTJHY have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.58M. In comparison, ERLFF has a market cap of 346.36M. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while ERLFF trades at $1.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas ERLFF's P/E ratio is -33.40. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +1.10%, compared to ERLFF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to ERLFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.

BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.58M. In comparison, KMRPF has a market cap of 335.16M. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while KMRPF trades at $3.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas KMRPF's P/E ratio is 5.34. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +1.10%, compared to KMRPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to KMRPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.

BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.58M. In comparison, MNXMF has a market cap of 334.33M. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while MNXMF trades at $0.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas MNXMF's P/E ratio is -58.20. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +1.10%, compared to MNXMF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS and MNXMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.58M. In comparison, MLYF has a market cap of 327.69M. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while MLYF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas MLYF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +1.10%, compared to MLYF's ROE of +5.32%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to MLYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.

BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.58M. In comparison, ARAFF has a market cap of 317.53M. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while ARAFF trades at $0.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas ARAFF's P/E ratio is -12.88. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +1.10%, compared to ARAFF's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to ARAFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.

BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.58M. In comparison, MLXEF has a market cap of 314.76M. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while MLXEF trades at $0.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas MLXEF's P/E ratio is 5.07. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +1.10%, compared to MLXEF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to MLXEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.

BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.58M. In comparison, AUMTF has a market cap of 313.13M. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while AUMTF trades at $0.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas AUMTF's P/E ratio is 18.50. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +1.10%, compared to AUMTF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to AUMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.

BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.58M. In comparison, SLGGF has a market cap of 300.11M. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while SLGGF trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas SLGGF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +1.10%, compared to SLGGF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to SLGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.

BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.58M. In comparison, SVMLF has a market cap of 284.65M. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while SVMLF trades at $0.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas SVMLF's P/E ratio is -14.67. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +1.10%, compared to SVMLF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to SVMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.

BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.58M. In comparison, CGMLF has a market cap of 283.99M. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while CGMLF trades at $0.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas CGMLF's P/E ratio is -18.25. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +1.10%, compared to CGMLF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to CGMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.

BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.58M. In comparison, LTSRF has a market cap of 281.48M. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while LTSRF trades at $0.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas LTSRF's P/E ratio is -11.88. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +1.10%, compared to LTSRF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to LTSRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.

BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.58M. In comparison, FWEDF has a market cap of 262.47M. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while FWEDF trades at $1.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas FWEDF's P/E ratio is -9.53. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +1.10%, compared to FWEDF's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to FWEDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.

BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.58M. In comparison, LRSRF has a market cap of 260.54M. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while LRSRF trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas LRSRF's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +1.10%, compared to LRSRF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to LRSRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.

BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.58M. In comparison, PMETF has a market cap of 259.29M. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while PMETF trades at $1.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas PMETF's P/E ratio is -55.00. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +1.10%, compared to PMETF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to PMETF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.

BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.58M. In comparison, STQNF has a market cap of 251.56M. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while STQNF trades at $0.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas STQNF's P/E ratio is -17.20. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +1.10%, compared to STQNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS and STQNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.58M. In comparison, RXRLF has a market cap of 238.68M. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while RXRLF trades at $0.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas RXRLF's P/E ratio is -29.90. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +1.10%, compared to RXRLF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to RXRLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.

BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.58M. In comparison, LTHHF has a market cap of 238.10M. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while LTHHF trades at $0.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas LTHHF's P/E ratio is -16.02. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +1.10%, compared to LTHHF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS and LTHHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.58M. In comparison, BSRUF has a market cap of 237.84M. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while BSRUF trades at $0.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas BSRUF's P/E ratio is -5.09. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +1.10%, compared to BSRUF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to BSRUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.

BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.58M. In comparison, EMOTF has a market cap of 234.63M. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while EMOTF trades at $0.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas EMOTF's P/E ratio is -22.28. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +1.10%, compared to EMOTF's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to EMOTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.

BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.58M. In comparison, PTTMF has a market cap of 234.60M. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while PTTMF trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas PTTMF's P/E ratio is 3.15. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +1.10%, compared to PTTMF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to PTTMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.

BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.58M. In comparison, ERDCF has a market cap of 232.88M. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while ERDCF trades at $0.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas ERDCF's P/E ratio is -64.15. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +1.10%, compared to ERDCF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to ERDCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.

BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.58M. In comparison, CILLF has a market cap of 232.44M. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while CILLF trades at $1.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas CILLF's P/E ratio is 10.91. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +1.10%, compared to CILLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS and CILLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

BOXS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOXS stands at 21.58M. In comparison, SYAAF has a market cap of 229.29M. Regarding current trading prices, BOXS is priced at $0.01, while SYAAF trades at $0.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas SYAAF's P/E ratio is -1.57. In terms of profitability, BOXS's ROE is +1.10%, compared to SYAAF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, BOXS is less volatile compared to SYAAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOXS.