Borussia Dortmund GmbH & Co. Kommanditgesellschaft auf Aktien
Borussia Dortmund GmbH & Co. Kommanditgesellschaft auf Aktien BORUF Peers
See (BORUF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Entertainment Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BORUF | $4.32 | +7.97% | 476.7M | 47.99 | $0.09 | +1.46% |
| UNVGY | $15.53 | -0.23% | 58.1B | 24.27 | $0.64 | +2.26% |
| UMGNF | $31.14 | -0.83% | 57.1B | 24.52 | $1.27 | +2.11% |
| FWONB | $80.50 | -7.66% | 27.9B | 1341.67 | $0.06 | N/A |
| BOIVF | $6.15 | -2.50% | 17.1B | 102.50 | $0.06 | +1.41% |
| NWSAL | $26.80 | N/A | 16.7B | 43.23 | $0.62 | +0.75% |
| CEVMF | $125.65 | +13.30% | 12.1B | 35.70 | $3.52 | +1.50% |
| CEVMY | $28.75 | -4.17% | 11B | 32.67 | $0.88 | +1.03% |
| VIVEF | $10.49 | +2.64% | 10.6B | 22.80 | $0.46 | N/A |
| TKCOF | $43.45 | +12.83% | 7.2B | 21.62 | $2.01 | +0.56% |
Stock Comparison
BORUF vs UNVGY Comparison
BORUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BORUF stands at 476.7M. In comparison, UNVGY has a market cap of 58.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BORUF is priced at $4.32, while UNVGY trades at $15.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BORUF currently has a P/E ratio of 47.99, whereas UNVGY's P/E ratio is 24.27. In terms of profitability, BORUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to UNVGY's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, BORUF is less volatile compared to UNVGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BORUF.
BORUF vs UMGNF Comparison
BORUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BORUF stands at 476.7M. In comparison, UMGNF has a market cap of 57.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BORUF is priced at $4.32, while UMGNF trades at $31.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BORUF currently has a P/E ratio of 47.99, whereas UMGNF's P/E ratio is 24.52. In terms of profitability, BORUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to UMGNF's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, BORUF is less volatile compared to UMGNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BORUF.
BORUF vs FWONB Comparison
BORUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BORUF stands at 476.7M. In comparison, FWONB has a market cap of 27.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BORUF is priced at $4.32, while FWONB trades at $80.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BORUF currently has a P/E ratio of 47.99, whereas FWONB's P/E ratio is 1341.67. In terms of profitability, BORUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to FWONB's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BORUF is less volatile compared to FWONB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BORUF.
BORUF vs BOIVF Comparison
BORUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BORUF stands at 476.7M. In comparison, BOIVF has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BORUF is priced at $4.32, while BOIVF trades at $6.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BORUF currently has a P/E ratio of 47.99, whereas BOIVF's P/E ratio is 102.50. In terms of profitability, BORUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to BOIVF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BORUF and BOIVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BORUF vs NWSAL Comparison
BORUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BORUF stands at 476.7M. In comparison, NWSAL has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BORUF is priced at $4.32, while NWSAL trades at $26.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BORUF currently has a P/E ratio of 47.99, whereas NWSAL's P/E ratio is 43.23. In terms of profitability, BORUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NWSAL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BORUF is less volatile compared to NWSAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BORUF.
BORUF vs CEVMF Comparison
BORUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BORUF stands at 476.7M. In comparison, CEVMF has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BORUF is priced at $4.32, while CEVMF trades at $125.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BORUF currently has a P/E ratio of 47.99, whereas CEVMF's P/E ratio is 35.70. In terms of profitability, BORUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CEVMF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, BORUF and CEVMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BORUF vs CEVMY Comparison
BORUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BORUF stands at 476.7M. In comparison, CEVMY has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, BORUF is priced at $4.32, while CEVMY trades at $28.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BORUF currently has a P/E ratio of 47.99, whereas CEVMY's P/E ratio is 32.67. In terms of profitability, BORUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CEVMY's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, BORUF is less volatile compared to CEVMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BORUF.
BORUF vs VIVEF Comparison
BORUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BORUF stands at 476.7M. In comparison, VIVEF has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BORUF is priced at $4.32, while VIVEF trades at $10.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BORUF currently has a P/E ratio of 47.99, whereas VIVEF's P/E ratio is 22.80. In terms of profitability, BORUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to VIVEF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BORUF and VIVEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BORUF vs TKCOF Comparison
BORUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BORUF stands at 476.7M. In comparison, TKCOF has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BORUF is priced at $4.32, while TKCOF trades at $43.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BORUF currently has a P/E ratio of 47.99, whereas TKCOF's P/E ratio is 21.62. In terms of profitability, BORUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to TKCOF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BORUF is less volatile compared to TKCOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BORUF.
BORUF vs TOEAF Comparison
BORUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BORUF stands at 476.7M. In comparison, TOEAF has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BORUF is priced at $4.32, while TOEAF trades at $21.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BORUF currently has a P/E ratio of 47.99, whereas TOEAF's P/E ratio is 26.49. In terms of profitability, BORUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to TOEAF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BORUF is less volatile compared to TOEAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BORUF.
BORUF vs VIVHY Comparison
BORUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BORUF stands at 476.7M. In comparison, VIVHY has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BORUF is priced at $4.32, while VIVHY trades at $3.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BORUF currently has a P/E ratio of 47.99, whereas VIVHY's P/E ratio is -16.14. In terms of profitability, BORUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to VIVHY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BORUF is less volatile compared to VIVHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BORUF.
BORUF vs MCHOY Comparison
BORUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BORUF stands at 476.7M. In comparison, MCHOY has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BORUF is priced at $4.32, while MCHOY trades at $6.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BORUF currently has a P/E ratio of 47.99, whereas MCHOY's P/E ratio is -10.71. In terms of profitability, BORUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MCHOY's ROE of -1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BORUF and MCHOY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BORUF vs MCOIF Comparison
BORUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BORUF stands at 476.7M. In comparison, MCOIF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BORUF is priced at $4.32, while MCOIF trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BORUF currently has a P/E ratio of 47.99, whereas MCOIF's P/E ratio is -10.71. In terms of profitability, BORUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MCOIF's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, BORUF and MCOIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BORUF vs MHSDF Comparison
BORUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BORUF stands at 476.7M. In comparison, MHSDF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BORUF is priced at $4.32, while MHSDF trades at $2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BORUF currently has a P/E ratio of 47.99, whereas MHSDF's P/E ratio is 38.57. In terms of profitability, BORUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MHSDF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BORUF is less volatile compared to MHSDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BORUF.
BORUF vs CYFWY Comparison
BORUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BORUF stands at 476.7M. In comparison, CYFWY has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BORUF is priced at $4.32, while CYFWY trades at $16.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BORUF currently has a P/E ratio of 47.99, whereas CYFWY's P/E ratio is 9.62. In terms of profitability, BORUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CYFWY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BORUF and CYFWY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BORUF vs NANHF Comparison
BORUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BORUF stands at 476.7M. In comparison, NANHF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BORUF is priced at $4.32, while NANHF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BORUF currently has a P/E ratio of 47.99, whereas NANHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BORUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NANHF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, BORUF and NANHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BORUF vs ATVDY Comparison
BORUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BORUF stands at 476.7M. In comparison, ATVDY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BORUF is priced at $4.32, while ATVDY trades at $6.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BORUF currently has a P/E ratio of 47.99, whereas ATVDY's P/E ratio is 11.27. In terms of profitability, BORUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ATVDY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BORUF and ATVDY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BORUF vs NNMTF Comparison
BORUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BORUF stands at 476.7M. In comparison, NNMTF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BORUF is priced at $4.32, while NNMTF trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BORUF currently has a P/E ratio of 47.99, whereas NNMTF's P/E ratio is 23.75. In terms of profitability, BORUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NNMTF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BORUF and NNMTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BORUF vs AIOSF Comparison
BORUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BORUF stands at 476.7M. In comparison, AIOSF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BORUF is priced at $4.32, while AIOSF trades at $6.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BORUF currently has a P/E ratio of 47.99, whereas AIOSF's P/E ratio is 10.95. In terms of profitability, BORUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to AIOSF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BORUF is less volatile compared to AIOSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BORUF.
BORUF vs NENTY Comparison
BORUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BORUF stands at 476.7M. In comparison, NENTY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BORUF is priced at $4.32, while NENTY trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BORUF currently has a P/E ratio of 47.99, whereas NENTY's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, BORUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NENTY's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BORUF and NENTY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BORUF vs CYFWF Comparison
BORUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BORUF stands at 476.7M. In comparison, CYFWF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BORUF is priced at $4.32, while CYFWF trades at $2.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BORUF currently has a P/E ratio of 47.99, whereas CYFWF's P/E ratio is 13.89. In terms of profitability, BORUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CYFWF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BORUF and CYFWF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BORUF vs JVTSF Comparison
BORUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BORUF stands at 476.7M. In comparison, JVTSF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BORUF is priced at $4.32, while JVTSF trades at $3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BORUF currently has a P/E ratio of 47.99, whereas JVTSF's P/E ratio is -375.00. In terms of profitability, BORUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to JVTSF's ROE of -4.84%. Regarding short-term risk, BORUF and JVTSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BORUF vs TCLRY Comparison
BORUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BORUF stands at 476.7M. In comparison, TCLRY has a market cap of 852.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BORUF is priced at $4.32, while TCLRY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BORUF currently has a P/E ratio of 47.99, whereas TCLRY's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, BORUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to TCLRY's ROE of -2.33%. Regarding short-term risk, BORUF is less volatile compared to TCLRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BORUF.
BORUF vs CIEZF Comparison
BORUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BORUF stands at 476.7M. In comparison, CIEZF has a market cap of 671.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BORUF is priced at $4.32, while CIEZF trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BORUF currently has a P/E ratio of 47.99, whereas CIEZF's P/E ratio is 9.23. In terms of profitability, BORUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CIEZF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, BORUF and CIEZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BORUF vs CPXGF Comparison
BORUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BORUF stands at 476.7M. In comparison, CPXGF has a market cap of 527.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BORUF is priced at $4.32, while CPXGF trades at $8.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BORUF currently has a P/E ratio of 47.99, whereas CPXGF's P/E ratio is -9.13. In terms of profitability, BORUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CPXGF's ROE of +1.90%. Regarding short-term risk, BORUF and CPXGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BORUF vs IMXCF Comparison
BORUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BORUF stands at 476.7M. In comparison, IMXCF has a market cap of 473.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BORUF is priced at $4.32, while IMXCF trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BORUF currently has a P/E ratio of 47.99, whereas IMXCF's P/E ratio is 23.33. In terms of profitability, BORUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to IMXCF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BORUF and IMXCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BORUF vs WLDBF Comparison
BORUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BORUF stands at 476.7M. In comparison, WLDBF has a market cap of 312.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BORUF is priced at $4.32, while WLDBF trades at $1.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BORUF currently has a P/E ratio of 47.99, whereas WLDBF's P/E ratio is -2.46. In terms of profitability, BORUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to WLDBF's ROE of +30.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BORUF is less volatile compared to WLDBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BORUF.
BORUF vs CLQDF Comparison
BORUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BORUF stands at 476.7M. In comparison, CLQDF has a market cap of 197.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BORUF is priced at $4.32, while CLQDF trades at $20.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BORUF currently has a P/E ratio of 47.99, whereas CLQDF's P/E ratio is 5.30. In terms of profitability, BORUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CLQDF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BORUF and CLQDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BORUF vs AFCJF Comparison
BORUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BORUF stands at 476.7M. In comparison, AFCJF has a market cap of 192.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BORUF is priced at $4.32, while AFCJF trades at $10.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BORUF currently has a P/E ratio of 47.99, whereas AFCJF's P/E ratio is -19.09. In terms of profitability, BORUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to AFCJF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BORUF is less volatile compared to AFCJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BORUF.
BORUF vs CLTFF Comparison
BORUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BORUF stands at 476.7M. In comparison, CLTFF has a market cap of 180.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BORUF is priced at $4.32, while CLTFF trades at $1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BORUF currently has a P/E ratio of 47.99, whereas CLTFF's P/E ratio is 7.92. In terms of profitability, BORUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CLTFF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BORUF is less volatile compared to CLTFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BORUF.
BORUF vs NENTF Comparison
BORUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BORUF stands at 476.7M. In comparison, NENTF has a market cap of 163M. Regarding current trading prices, BORUF is priced at $4.32, while NENTF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BORUF currently has a P/E ratio of 47.99, whereas NENTF's P/E ratio is -1.78. In terms of profitability, BORUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NENTF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BORUF is less volatile compared to NENTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BORUF.
BORUF vs APTTF Comparison
BORUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BORUF stands at 476.7M. In comparison, APTTF has a market cap of 112.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BORUF is priced at $4.32, while APTTF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BORUF currently has a P/E ratio of 47.99, whereas APTTF's P/E ratio is 3.12. In terms of profitability, BORUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to APTTF's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, BORUF is less volatile compared to APTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BORUF.
BORUF vs STEAF Comparison
BORUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BORUF stands at 476.7M. In comparison, STEAF has a market cap of 87.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BORUF is priced at $4.32, while STEAF trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BORUF currently has a P/E ratio of 47.99, whereas STEAF's P/E ratio is 18.92. In terms of profitability, BORUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to STEAF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BORUF is less volatile compared to STEAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BORUF.
BORUF vs ANGMF Comparison
BORUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BORUF stands at 476.7M. In comparison, ANGMF has a market cap of 72.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BORUF is priced at $4.32, while ANGMF trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BORUF currently has a P/E ratio of 47.99, whereas ANGMF's P/E ratio is 17.59. In terms of profitability, BORUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ANGMF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BORUF and ANGMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BORUF vs GOAI Comparison
BORUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BORUF stands at 476.7M. In comparison, GOAI has a market cap of 62.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BORUF is priced at $4.32, while GOAI trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BORUF currently has a P/E ratio of 47.99, whereas GOAI's P/E ratio is -28.57. In terms of profitability, BORUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to GOAI's ROE of -1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BORUF and GOAI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BORUF vs THBRF Comparison
BORUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BORUF stands at 476.7M. In comparison, THBRF has a market cap of 48M. Regarding current trading prices, BORUF is priced at $4.32, while THBRF trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BORUF currently has a P/E ratio of 47.99, whereas THBRF's P/E ratio is 11.30. In terms of profitability, BORUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to THBRF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BORUF is less volatile compared to THBRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BORUF.
BORUF vs GMSQF Comparison
BORUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BORUF stands at 476.7M. In comparison, GMSQF has a market cap of 39.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BORUF is priced at $4.32, while GMSQF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BORUF currently has a P/E ratio of 47.99, whereas GMSQF's P/E ratio is -1.13. In terms of profitability, BORUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to GMSQF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BORUF is less volatile compared to GMSQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BORUF.
BORUF vs ZUMRF Comparison
BORUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BORUF stands at 476.7M. In comparison, ZUMRF has a market cap of 35.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BORUF is priced at $4.32, while ZUMRF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BORUF currently has a P/E ratio of 47.99, whereas ZUMRF's P/E ratio is 5.00. In terms of profitability, BORUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ZUMRF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BORUF and ZUMRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BORUF vs DTTVY Comparison
BORUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BORUF stands at 476.7M. In comparison, DTTVY has a market cap of 34.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BORUF is priced at $4.32, while DTTVY trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BORUF currently has a P/E ratio of 47.99, whereas DTTVY's P/E ratio is -0.62. In terms of profitability, BORUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to DTTVY's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, BORUF is less volatile compared to DTTVY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BORUF.
BORUF vs LGMH Comparison
BORUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BORUF stands at 476.7M. In comparison, LGMH has a market cap of 33.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BORUF is priced at $4.32, while LGMH trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BORUF currently has a P/E ratio of 47.99, whereas LGMH's P/E ratio is -66.66. In terms of profitability, BORUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to LGMH's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BORUF is less volatile compared to LGMH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BORUF.
BORUF vs APHP Comparison
BORUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BORUF stands at 476.7M. In comparison, APHP has a market cap of 28.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BORUF is priced at $4.32, while APHP trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BORUF currently has a P/E ratio of 47.99, whereas APHP's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, BORUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to APHP's ROE of +6.60%. Regarding short-term risk, BORUF and APHP have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BORUF vs OAMCF Comparison
BORUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BORUF stands at 476.7M. In comparison, OAMCF has a market cap of 23.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BORUF is priced at $4.32, while OAMCF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BORUF currently has a P/E ratio of 47.99, whereas OAMCF's P/E ratio is -19.00. In terms of profitability, BORUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to OAMCF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BORUF is less volatile compared to OAMCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BORUF.
BORUF vs ICABY Comparison
BORUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BORUF stands at 476.7M. In comparison, ICABY has a market cap of 21.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BORUF is priced at $4.32, while ICABY trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BORUF currently has a P/E ratio of 47.99, whereas ICABY's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, BORUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ICABY's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, BORUF is less volatile compared to ICABY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BORUF.
BORUF vs QYOUF Comparison
BORUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BORUF stands at 476.7M. In comparison, QYOUF has a market cap of 17.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BORUF is priced at $4.32, while QYOUF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BORUF currently has a P/E ratio of 47.99, whereas QYOUF's P/E ratio is -2.95. In terms of profitability, BORUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to QYOUF's ROE of -1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BORUF and QYOUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BORUF vs ASGRF Comparison
BORUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BORUF stands at 476.7M. In comparison, ASGRF has a market cap of 14.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BORUF is priced at $4.32, while ASGRF trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BORUF currently has a P/E ratio of 47.99, whereas ASGRF's P/E ratio is -12.00. In terms of profitability, BORUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ASGRF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BORUF and ASGRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BORUF vs BBOP Comparison
BORUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BORUF stands at 476.7M. In comparison, BBOP has a market cap of 10.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BORUF is priced at $4.32, while BBOP trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BORUF currently has a P/E ratio of 47.99, whereas BBOP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BORUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to BBOP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BORUF and BBOP have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BORUF vs CNWGQ Comparison
BORUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BORUF stands at 476.7M. In comparison, CNWGQ has a market cap of 9.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BORUF is priced at $4.32, while CNWGQ trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BORUF currently has a P/E ratio of 47.99, whereas CNWGQ's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, BORUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CNWGQ's ROE of +9.53%. Regarding short-term risk, BORUF is less volatile compared to CNWGQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BORUF.
BORUF vs XOEEF Comparison
BORUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BORUF stands at 476.7M. In comparison, XOEEF has a market cap of 9.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BORUF is priced at $4.32, while XOEEF trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BORUF currently has a P/E ratio of 47.99, whereas XOEEF's P/E ratio is -43.73. In terms of profitability, BORUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to XOEEF's ROE of +1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BORUF is less volatile compared to XOEEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BORUF.
BORUF vs MVNC Comparison
BORUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BORUF stands at 476.7M. In comparison, MVNC has a market cap of 7.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BORUF is priced at $4.32, while MVNC trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BORUF currently has a P/E ratio of 47.99, whereas MVNC's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, BORUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MVNC's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, BORUF is less volatile compared to MVNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BORUF.
BORUF vs CNNWQ Comparison
BORUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BORUF stands at 476.7M. In comparison, CNNWQ has a market cap of 7M. Regarding current trading prices, BORUF is priced at $4.32, while CNNWQ trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BORUF currently has a P/E ratio of 47.99, whereas CNNWQ's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, BORUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CNNWQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BORUF is less volatile compared to CNNWQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BORUF.
BORUF vs HWAL Comparison
BORUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BORUF stands at 476.7M. In comparison, HWAL has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BORUF is priced at $4.32, while HWAL trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BORUF currently has a P/E ratio of 47.99, whereas HWAL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BORUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to HWAL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BORUF is less volatile compared to HWAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BORUF.
BORUF vs HHSE Comparison
BORUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BORUF stands at 476.7M. In comparison, HHSE has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BORUF is priced at $4.32, while HHSE trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BORUF currently has a P/E ratio of 47.99, whereas HHSE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BORUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to HHSE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BORUF and HHSE have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BORUF vs STGZ Comparison
BORUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BORUF stands at 476.7M. In comparison, STGZ has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BORUF is priced at $4.32, while STGZ trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BORUF currently has a P/E ratio of 47.99, whereas STGZ's P/E ratio is 0.63. In terms of profitability, BORUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to STGZ's ROE of -2.83%. Regarding short-term risk, BORUF is less volatile compared to STGZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BORUF.
BORUF vs AMFL Comparison
BORUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BORUF stands at 476.7M. In comparison, AMFL has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BORUF is priced at $4.32, while AMFL trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BORUF currently has a P/E ratio of 47.99, whereas AMFL's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, BORUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to AMFL's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BORUF is less volatile compared to AMFL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BORUF.
BORUF vs ICABF Comparison
BORUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BORUF stands at 476.7M. In comparison, ICABF has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, BORUF is priced at $4.32, while ICABF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BORUF currently has a P/E ratio of 47.99, whereas ICABF's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, BORUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ICABF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, BORUF and ICABF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BORUF vs BLIBQ Comparison
BORUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BORUF stands at 476.7M. In comparison, BLIBQ has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, BORUF is priced at $4.32, while BLIBQ trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BORUF currently has a P/E ratio of 47.99, whereas BLIBQ's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, BORUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to BLIBQ's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, BORUF and BLIBQ have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BORUF vs GULDF Comparison
BORUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BORUF stands at 476.7M. In comparison, GULDF has a market cap of 4.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BORUF is priced at $4.32, while GULDF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BORUF currently has a P/E ratio of 47.99, whereas GULDF's P/E ratio is -0.54. In terms of profitability, BORUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to GULDF's ROE of -2.70%. Regarding short-term risk, BORUF is less volatile compared to GULDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BORUF.
BORUF vs LTES Comparison
BORUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BORUF stands at 476.7M. In comparison, LTES has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, BORUF is priced at $4.32, while LTES trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BORUF currently has a P/E ratio of 47.99, whereas LTES's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, BORUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to LTES's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BORUF is less volatile compared to LTES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BORUF.
BORUF vs BLIAQ Comparison
BORUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BORUF stands at 476.7M. In comparison, BLIAQ has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BORUF is priced at $4.32, while BLIAQ trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BORUF currently has a P/E ratio of 47.99, whereas BLIAQ's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, BORUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to BLIAQ's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, BORUF and BLIAQ have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BORUF vs CAPV Comparison
BORUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BORUF stands at 476.7M. In comparison, CAPV has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BORUF is priced at $4.32, while CAPV trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BORUF currently has a P/E ratio of 47.99, whereas CAPV's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, BORUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CAPV's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BORUF is less volatile compared to CAPV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BORUF.
BORUF vs EEGI Comparison
BORUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BORUF stands at 476.7M. In comparison, EEGI has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BORUF is priced at $4.32, while EEGI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BORUF currently has a P/E ratio of 47.99, whereas EEGI's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, BORUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to EEGI's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, BORUF is less volatile compared to EEGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BORUF.
BORUF vs ENTEF Comparison
BORUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BORUF stands at 476.7M. In comparison, ENTEF has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BORUF is priced at $4.32, while ENTEF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BORUF currently has a P/E ratio of 47.99, whereas ENTEF's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, BORUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ENTEF's ROE of -7.66%. Regarding short-term risk, BORUF and ENTEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BORUF vs ITVI Comparison
BORUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BORUF stands at 476.7M. In comparison, ITVI has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BORUF is priced at $4.32, while ITVI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BORUF currently has a P/E ratio of 47.99, whereas ITVI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BORUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ITVI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BORUF and ITVI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BORUF vs HDUP Comparison
BORUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BORUF stands at 476.7M. In comparison, HDUP has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BORUF is priced at $4.32, while HDUP trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BORUF currently has a P/E ratio of 47.99, whereas HDUP's P/E ratio is -1.76. In terms of profitability, BORUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to HDUP's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, BORUF is less volatile compared to HDUP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BORUF.
BORUF vs NETWF Comparison
BORUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BORUF stands at 476.7M. In comparison, NETWF has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BORUF is priced at $4.32, while NETWF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BORUF currently has a P/E ratio of 47.99, whereas NETWF's P/E ratio is -2.44. In terms of profitability, BORUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NETWF's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BORUF and NETWF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BORUF vs BSEG Comparison
BORUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BORUF stands at 476.7M. In comparison, BSEG has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BORUF is priced at $4.32, while BSEG trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BORUF currently has a P/E ratio of 47.99, whereas BSEG's P/E ratio is 7.20. In terms of profitability, BORUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to BSEG's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BORUF is less volatile compared to BSEG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BORUF.
BORUF vs SEGI Comparison
BORUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BORUF stands at 476.7M. In comparison, SEGI has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BORUF is priced at $4.32, while SEGI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BORUF currently has a P/E ratio of 47.99, whereas SEGI's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, BORUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SEGI's ROE of +0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, BORUF and SEGI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BORUF vs STCXF Comparison
BORUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BORUF stands at 476.7M. In comparison, STCXF has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, BORUF is priced at $4.32, while STCXF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BORUF currently has a P/E ratio of 47.99, whereas STCXF's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, BORUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to STCXF's ROE of -1.26%. Regarding short-term risk, BORUF and STCXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BORUF vs AFOM Comparison
BORUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BORUF stands at 476.7M. In comparison, AFOM has a market cap of 925.3K. Regarding current trading prices, BORUF is priced at $4.32, while AFOM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BORUF currently has a P/E ratio of 47.99, whereas AFOM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BORUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to AFOM's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, BORUF is less volatile compared to AFOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BORUF.
BORUF vs VNUE Comparison
BORUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BORUF stands at 476.7M. In comparison, VNUE has a market cap of 886.3K. Regarding current trading prices, BORUF is priced at $4.32, while VNUE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BORUF currently has a P/E ratio of 47.99, whereas VNUE's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, BORUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to VNUE's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BORUF is less volatile compared to VNUE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BORUF.
BORUF vs TRMNF Comparison
BORUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BORUF stands at 476.7M. In comparison, TRMNF has a market cap of 857.2K. Regarding current trading prices, BORUF is priced at $4.32, while TRMNF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BORUF currently has a P/E ratio of 47.99, whereas TRMNF's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, BORUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to TRMNF's ROE of -1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, BORUF and TRMNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BORUF vs HQGE Comparison
BORUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BORUF stands at 476.7M. In comparison, HQGE has a market cap of 774K. Regarding current trading prices, BORUF is priced at $4.32, while HQGE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BORUF currently has a P/E ratio of 47.99, whereas HQGE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BORUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to HQGE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BORUF and HQGE have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BORUF vs RLTR Comparison
BORUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BORUF stands at 476.7M. In comparison, RLTR has a market cap of 737.2K. Regarding current trading prices, BORUF is priced at $4.32, while RLTR trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BORUF currently has a P/E ratio of 47.99, whereas RLTR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BORUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to RLTR's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, BORUF and RLTR have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BORUF vs AMNNF Comparison
BORUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BORUF stands at 476.7M. In comparison, AMNNF has a market cap of 736.1K. Regarding current trading prices, BORUF is priced at $4.32, while AMNNF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BORUF currently has a P/E ratio of 47.99, whereas AMNNF's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, BORUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to AMNNF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, BORUF and AMNNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BORUF vs WRIT Comparison
BORUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BORUF stands at 476.7M. In comparison, WRIT has a market cap of 632.4K. Regarding current trading prices, BORUF is priced at $4.32, while WRIT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BORUF currently has a P/E ratio of 47.99, whereas WRIT's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, BORUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to WRIT's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BORUF is less volatile compared to WRIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BORUF.
BORUF vs UMGP Comparison
BORUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BORUF stands at 476.7M. In comparison, UMGP has a market cap of 560.6K. Regarding current trading prices, BORUF is priced at $4.32, while UMGP trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BORUF currently has a P/E ratio of 47.99, whereas UMGP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BORUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to UMGP's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BORUF is less volatile compared to UMGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BORUF.
BORUF vs CCLX Comparison
BORUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BORUF stands at 476.7M. In comparison, CCLX has a market cap of 499.8K. Regarding current trading prices, BORUF is priced at $4.32, while CCLX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BORUF currently has a P/E ratio of 47.99, whereas CCLX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BORUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CCLX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BORUF is less volatile compared to CCLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BORUF.
BORUF vs TAMG Comparison
BORUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BORUF stands at 476.7M. In comparison, TAMG has a market cap of 463.7K. Regarding current trading prices, BORUF is priced at $4.32, while TAMG trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BORUF currently has a P/E ratio of 47.99, whereas TAMG's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, BORUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to TAMG's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BORUF and TAMG have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BORUF vs BOTY Comparison
BORUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BORUF stands at 476.7M. In comparison, BOTY has a market cap of 460.5K. Regarding current trading prices, BORUF is priced at $4.32, while BOTY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BORUF currently has a P/E ratio of 47.99, whereas BOTY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BORUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to BOTY's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, BORUF and BOTY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BORUF vs WEBB Comparison
BORUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BORUF stands at 476.7M. In comparison, WEBB has a market cap of 389.8K. Regarding current trading prices, BORUF is priced at $4.32, while WEBB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BORUF currently has a P/E ratio of 47.99, whereas WEBB's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, BORUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to WEBB's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, BORUF and WEBB have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BORUF vs IMTV Comparison
BORUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BORUF stands at 476.7M. In comparison, IMTV has a market cap of 313.7K. Regarding current trading prices, BORUF is priced at $4.32, while IMTV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BORUF currently has a P/E ratio of 47.99, whereas IMTV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BORUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to IMTV's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BORUF is less volatile compared to IMTV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BORUF.
BORUF vs VGTL Comparison
BORUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BORUF stands at 476.7M. In comparison, VGTL has a market cap of 308.7K. Regarding current trading prices, BORUF is priced at $4.32, while VGTL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BORUF currently has a P/E ratio of 47.99, whereas VGTL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BORUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to VGTL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BORUF is less volatile compared to VGTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BORUF.
BORUF vs CEXE Comparison
BORUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BORUF stands at 476.7M. In comparison, CEXE has a market cap of 260.3K. Regarding current trading prices, BORUF is priced at $4.32, while CEXE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BORUF currently has a P/E ratio of 47.99, whereas CEXE's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, BORUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CEXE's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BORUF is less volatile compared to CEXE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BORUF.
BORUF vs RIVU Comparison
BORUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BORUF stands at 476.7M. In comparison, RIVU has a market cap of 244.9K. Regarding current trading prices, BORUF is priced at $4.32, while RIVU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BORUF currently has a P/E ratio of 47.99, whereas RIVU's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, BORUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to RIVU's ROE of -2.64%. Regarding short-term risk, BORUF and RIVU have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BORUF vs MIKP Comparison
BORUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BORUF stands at 476.7M. In comparison, MIKP has a market cap of 222.7K. Regarding current trading prices, BORUF is priced at $4.32, while MIKP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BORUF currently has a P/E ratio of 47.99, whereas MIKP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BORUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MIKP's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BORUF and MIKP have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BORUF vs MLFB Comparison
BORUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BORUF stands at 476.7M. In comparison, MLFB has a market cap of 148.8K. Regarding current trading prices, BORUF is priced at $4.32, while MLFB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BORUF currently has a P/E ratio of 47.99, whereas MLFB's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, BORUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MLFB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BORUF and MLFB have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BORUF vs SNMN Comparison
BORUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BORUF stands at 476.7M. In comparison, SNMN has a market cap of 112.9K. Regarding current trading prices, BORUF is priced at $4.32, while SNMN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BORUF currently has a P/E ratio of 47.99, whereas SNMN's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, BORUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SNMN's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BORUF is less volatile compared to SNMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BORUF.
BORUF vs RWMI Comparison
BORUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BORUF stands at 476.7M. In comparison, RWMI has a market cap of 109.1K. Regarding current trading prices, BORUF is priced at $4.32, while RWMI trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BORUF currently has a P/E ratio of 47.99, whereas RWMI's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, BORUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to RWMI's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BORUF is less volatile compared to RWMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BORUF.
BORUF vs SAPX Comparison
BORUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BORUF stands at 476.7M. In comparison, SAPX has a market cap of 65.1K. Regarding current trading prices, BORUF is priced at $4.32, while SAPX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BORUF currently has a P/E ratio of 47.99, whereas SAPX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BORUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SAPX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BORUF and SAPX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BORUF vs URBT Comparison
BORUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BORUF stands at 476.7M. In comparison, URBT has a market cap of 63K. Regarding current trading prices, BORUF is priced at $4.32, while URBT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BORUF currently has a P/E ratio of 47.99, whereas URBT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BORUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to URBT's ROE of +67.97%. Regarding short-term risk, BORUF and URBT have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BORUF vs SVSN Comparison
BORUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BORUF stands at 476.7M. In comparison, SVSN has a market cap of 58K. Regarding current trading prices, BORUF is priced at $4.32, while SVSN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BORUF currently has a P/E ratio of 47.99, whereas SVSN's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, BORUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SVSN's ROE of -2.44%. Regarding short-term risk, BORUF is less volatile compared to SVSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BORUF.
BORUF vs GBHL Comparison
BORUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BORUF stands at 476.7M. In comparison, GBHL has a market cap of 57.1K. Regarding current trading prices, BORUF is priced at $4.32, while GBHL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BORUF currently has a P/E ratio of 47.99, whereas GBHL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BORUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to GBHL's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, BORUF and GBHL have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BORUF vs AMRU Comparison
BORUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BORUF stands at 476.7M. In comparison, AMRU has a market cap of 47.2K. Regarding current trading prices, BORUF is priced at $4.32, while AMRU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BORUF currently has a P/E ratio of 47.99, whereas AMRU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BORUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to AMRU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BORUF and AMRU have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BORUF vs HOMU Comparison
BORUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BORUF stands at 476.7M. In comparison, HOMU has a market cap of 37.5K. Regarding current trading prices, BORUF is priced at $4.32, while HOMU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BORUF currently has a P/E ratio of 47.99, whereas HOMU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BORUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to HOMU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BORUF is less volatile compared to HOMU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BORUF.
BORUF vs SAKL Comparison
BORUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BORUF stands at 476.7M. In comparison, SAKL has a market cap of 34.9K. Regarding current trading prices, BORUF is priced at $4.32, while SAKL trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BORUF currently has a P/E ratio of 47.99, whereas SAKL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BORUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SAKL's ROE of -1.80%. Regarding short-term risk, BORUF and SAKL have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BORUF vs XSPT Comparison
BORUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BORUF stands at 476.7M. In comparison, XSPT has a market cap of 33.3K. Regarding current trading prices, BORUF is priced at $4.32, while XSPT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BORUF currently has a P/E ratio of 47.99, whereas XSPT's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, BORUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to XSPT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BORUF and XSPT have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BORUF vs PLFX Comparison
BORUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BORUF stands at 476.7M. In comparison, PLFX has a market cap of 28.4K. Regarding current trading prices, BORUF is priced at $4.32, while PLFX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BORUF currently has a P/E ratio of 47.99, whereas PLFX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BORUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PLFX's ROE of +2.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BORUF is less volatile compared to PLFX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BORUF.
BORUF vs GTOR Comparison
BORUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BORUF stands at 476.7M. In comparison, GTOR has a market cap of 24.1K. Regarding current trading prices, BORUF is priced at $4.32, while GTOR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BORUF currently has a P/E ratio of 47.99, whereas GTOR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BORUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to GTOR's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BORUF and GTOR have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BORUF vs AMXX Comparison
BORUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BORUF stands at 476.7M. In comparison, AMXX has a market cap of 22.7K. Regarding current trading prices, BORUF is priced at $4.32, while AMXX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BORUF currently has a P/E ratio of 47.99, whereas AMXX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BORUF's ROE is -0.02%, compared to AMXX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BORUF is less volatile compared to AMXX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BORUF.