Lyxor Index Fund - Lyxor Stoxx Europe 600 Banks UCITS ETF Acc
Lyxor Index Fund - Lyxor Stoxx Europe 600 Banks UCITS ETF Acc (BNK.PA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (BNK.PA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BNK.PA | €55.42 | -0.72% | 2.5B | 10.65 | €5.20 | N/A |
| CSPX.AS | €597.93 | -1.51% | 108.9B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| IWDA.AS | €107.52 | -1.35% | 105.7B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| VUSA.AS | €105.46 | -1.52% | 66.6B | N/A | N/A | +1.01% |
| VWRL.AS | €137.28 | -1.35% | 50.7B | N/A | N/A | +1.44% |
| SP5C.PA | €403.11 | -1.53% | 22.7B | 26.04 | €15.48 | N/A |
| SP5H.PA | €310.30 | -1.71% | 22.6B | 25.34 | €12.25 | +1.07% |
| IUSA.AS | €55.43 | -1.52% | 16.9B | N/A | N/A | +1.00% |
| CSH2.PA | €108.74 | +0.02% | 16.6B | 28.29 | €3.84 | N/A |
| ISFA.AS | €11.25 | -0.25% | 16.4B | N/A | N/A | +3.02% |
Stock Comparison
BNK.PA vs CSPX.AS Comparison March 2026
BNK.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNK.PA stands at 2.5B. In comparison, CSPX.AS has a market cap of 108.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BNK.PA is priced at €55.42, while CSPX.AS trades at €597.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNK.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.65, whereas CSPX.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BNK.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to CSPX.AS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BNK.PA is more volatile compared to CSPX.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNK.PA.Check CSPX.AS's competition here
BNK.PA vs IWDA.AS Comparison March 2026
BNK.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNK.PA stands at 2.5B. In comparison, IWDA.AS has a market cap of 105.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BNK.PA is priced at €55.42, while IWDA.AS trades at €107.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNK.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.65, whereas IWDA.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BNK.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to IWDA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BNK.PA is more volatile compared to IWDA.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNK.PA.Check IWDA.AS's competition here
BNK.PA vs VUSA.AS Comparison March 2026
BNK.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNK.PA stands at 2.5B. In comparison, VUSA.AS has a market cap of 66.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BNK.PA is priced at €55.42, while VUSA.AS trades at €105.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNK.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.65, whereas VUSA.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BNK.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to VUSA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BNK.PA is more volatile compared to VUSA.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNK.PA.Check VUSA.AS's competition here
BNK.PA vs VWRL.AS Comparison March 2026
BNK.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNK.PA stands at 2.5B. In comparison, VWRL.AS has a market cap of 50.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BNK.PA is priced at €55.42, while VWRL.AS trades at €137.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNK.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.65, whereas VWRL.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BNK.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to VWRL.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BNK.PA is more volatile compared to VWRL.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNK.PA.Check VWRL.AS's competition here
BNK.PA vs SP5C.PA Comparison March 2026
BNK.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNK.PA stands at 2.5B. In comparison, SP5C.PA has a market cap of 22.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BNK.PA is priced at €55.42, while SP5C.PA trades at €403.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNK.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.65, whereas SP5C.PA's P/E ratio is 26.04. In terms of profitability, BNK.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to SP5C.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BNK.PA is more volatile compared to SP5C.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNK.PA.Check SP5C.PA's competition here
BNK.PA vs SP5H.PA Comparison March 2026
BNK.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNK.PA stands at 2.5B. In comparison, SP5H.PA has a market cap of 22.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BNK.PA is priced at €55.42, while SP5H.PA trades at €310.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNK.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.65, whereas SP5H.PA's P/E ratio is 25.34. In terms of profitability, BNK.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to SP5H.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BNK.PA is more volatile compared to SP5H.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNK.PA.Check SP5H.PA's competition here
BNK.PA vs IUSA.AS Comparison March 2026
BNK.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNK.PA stands at 2.5B. In comparison, IUSA.AS has a market cap of 16.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BNK.PA is priced at €55.42, while IUSA.AS trades at €55.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNK.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.65, whereas IUSA.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BNK.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to IUSA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BNK.PA is more volatile compared to IUSA.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNK.PA.Check IUSA.AS's competition here
BNK.PA vs CSH2.PA Comparison March 2026
BNK.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNK.PA stands at 2.5B. In comparison, CSH2.PA has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BNK.PA is priced at €55.42, while CSH2.PA trades at €108.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNK.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.65, whereas CSH2.PA's P/E ratio is 28.29. In terms of profitability, BNK.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to CSH2.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BNK.PA is more volatile compared to CSH2.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNK.PA.Check CSH2.PA's competition here
BNK.PA vs ISFA.AS Comparison March 2026
BNK.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNK.PA stands at 2.5B. In comparison, ISFA.AS has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BNK.PA is priced at €55.42, while ISFA.AS trades at €11.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNK.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.65, whereas ISFA.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BNK.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to ISFA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BNK.PA is more volatile compared to ISFA.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNK.PA.Check ISFA.AS's competition here
BNK.PA vs HAL.AS Comparison March 2026
BNK.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNK.PA stands at 2.5B. In comparison, HAL.AS has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BNK.PA is priced at €55.42, while HAL.AS trades at €168.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNK.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.65, whereas HAL.AS's P/E ratio is 8.85. In terms of profitability, BNK.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to HAL.AS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BNK.PA is less volatile compared to HAL.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNK.PA.Check HAL.AS's competition here
BNK.PA vs AMUN.PA Comparison March 2026
BNK.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNK.PA stands at 2.5B. In comparison, AMUN.PA has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BNK.PA is priced at €55.42, while AMUN.PA trades at €72.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNK.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.65, whereas AMUN.PA's P/E ratio is 8.91. In terms of profitability, BNK.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to AMUN.PA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BNK.PA is less volatile compared to AMUN.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNK.PA.Check AMUN.PA's competition here
BNK.PA vs MEUD.PA Comparison March 2026
BNK.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNK.PA stands at 2.5B. In comparison, MEUD.PA has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BNK.PA is priced at €55.42, while MEUD.PA trades at €278.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNK.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.65, whereas MEUD.PA's P/E ratio is 17.37. In terms of profitability, BNK.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to MEUD.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BNK.PA is more volatile compared to MEUD.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNK.PA.Check MEUD.PA's competition here
BNK.PA vs I500.AS Comparison March 2026
BNK.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNK.PA stands at 2.5B. In comparison, I500.AS has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BNK.PA is priced at €55.42, while I500.AS trades at €10.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNK.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.65, whereas I500.AS's P/E ratio is 25.42. In terms of profitability, BNK.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to I500.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BNK.PA is more volatile compared to I500.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNK.PA.Check I500.AS's competition here
BNK.PA vs I50D.AS Comparison March 2026
BNK.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNK.PA stands at 2.5B. In comparison, I50D.AS has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BNK.PA is priced at €55.42, while I50D.AS trades at €7.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNK.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.65, whereas I50D.AS's P/E ratio is 25.45. In terms of profitability, BNK.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to I50D.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BNK.PA is more volatile compared to I50D.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNK.PA.Check I50D.AS's competition here
BNK.PA vs GOLD.PA Comparison March 2026
BNK.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNK.PA stands at 2.5B. In comparison, GOLD.PA has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BNK.PA is priced at €55.42, while GOLD.PA trades at €155.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNK.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.65, whereas GOLD.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BNK.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to GOLD.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BNK.PA is less volatile compared to GOLD.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNK.PA.Check GOLD.PA's competition here
BNK.PA vs IMEU.AS Comparison March 2026
BNK.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNK.PA stands at 2.5B. In comparison, IMEU.AS has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BNK.PA is priced at €55.42, while IMEU.AS trades at €35.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNK.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.65, whereas IMEU.AS's P/E ratio is 17.77. In terms of profitability, BNK.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to IMEU.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BNK.PA is more volatile compared to IMEU.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNK.PA.Check IMEU.AS's competition here
BNK.PA vs VHYL.AS Comparison March 2026
BNK.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNK.PA stands at 2.5B. In comparison, VHYL.AS has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BNK.PA is priced at €55.42, while VHYL.AS trades at €72.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNK.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.65, whereas VHYL.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BNK.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to VHYL.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BNK.PA is more volatile compared to VHYL.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNK.PA.Check VHYL.AS's competition here
BNK.PA vs PSH.AS Comparison March 2026
BNK.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNK.PA stands at 2.5B. In comparison, PSH.AS has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BNK.PA is priced at €55.42, while PSH.AS trades at €51.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNK.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.65, whereas PSH.AS's P/E ratio is 4.41. In terms of profitability, BNK.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to PSH.AS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BNK.PA is less volatile compared to PSH.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNK.PA.Check PSH.AS's competition here
BNK.PA vs GBLB.BR Comparison March 2026
BNK.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNK.PA stands at 2.5B. In comparison, GBLB.BR has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BNK.PA is priced at €55.42, while GBLB.BR trades at €76.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNK.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.65, whereas GBLB.BR's P/E ratio is -28.65. In terms of profitability, BNK.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to GBLB.BR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BNK.PA is more volatile compared to GBLB.BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNK.PA.Check GBLB.BR's competition here
BNK.PA vs WLD.PA Comparison March 2026
BNK.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNK.PA stands at 2.5B. In comparison, WLD.PA has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BNK.PA is priced at €55.42, while WLD.PA trades at €361.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNK.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.65, whereas WLD.PA's P/E ratio is 23.19. In terms of profitability, BNK.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to WLD.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BNK.PA is more volatile compared to WLD.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNK.PA.Check WLD.PA's competition here
BNK.PA vs WLDHC.PA Comparison March 2026
BNK.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNK.PA stands at 2.5B. In comparison, WLDHC.PA has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BNK.PA is priced at €55.42, while WLDHC.PA trades at €14.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNK.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.65, whereas WLDHC.PA's P/E ratio is 22.72. In terms of profitability, BNK.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to WLDHC.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BNK.PA is more volatile compared to WLDHC.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNK.PA.Check WLDHC.PA's competition here
BNK.PA vs WLDH.PA Comparison March 2026
BNK.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNK.PA stands at 2.5B. In comparison, WLDH.PA has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BNK.PA is priced at €55.42, while WLDH.PA trades at €227.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNK.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.65, whereas WLDH.PA's P/E ratio is 22.72. In terms of profitability, BNK.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to WLDH.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BNK.PA is more volatile compared to WLDH.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNK.PA.Check WLDH.PA's competition here
BNK.PA vs CBUG.AS Comparison March 2026
BNK.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNK.PA stands at 2.5B. In comparison, CBUG.AS has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BNK.PA is priced at €55.42, while CBUG.AS trades at €4.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNK.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.65, whereas CBUG.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BNK.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to CBUG.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BNK.PA is more volatile compared to CBUG.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNK.PA.Check CBUG.AS's competition here
BNK.PA vs CEUU.AS Comparison March 2026
BNK.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNK.PA stands at 2.5B. In comparison, CEUU.AS has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BNK.PA is priced at €55.42, while CEUU.AS trades at €10.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNK.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.65, whereas CEUU.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BNK.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to CEUU.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BNK.PA is more volatile compared to CEUU.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNK.PA.Check CEUU.AS's competition here
BNK.PA vs IEMM.AS Comparison March 2026
BNK.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNK.PA stands at 2.5B. In comparison, IEMM.AS has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, BNK.PA is priced at €55.42, while IEMM.AS trades at €47.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNK.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.65, whereas IEMM.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BNK.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to IEMM.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BNK.PA is more volatile compared to IEMM.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNK.PA.Check IEMM.AS's competition here
BNK.PA vs SOF.BR Comparison March 2026
BNK.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNK.PA stands at 2.5B. In comparison, SOF.BR has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BNK.PA is priced at €55.42, while SOF.BR trades at €207.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNK.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.65, whereas SOF.BR's P/E ratio is 63.74. In terms of profitability, BNK.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to SOF.BR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BNK.PA is less volatile compared to SOF.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNK.PA.Check SOF.BR's competition here
BNK.PA vs IWRD.AS Comparison March 2026
BNK.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNK.PA stands at 2.5B. In comparison, IWRD.AS has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BNK.PA is priced at €55.42, while IWRD.AS trades at €77.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNK.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.65, whereas IWRD.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BNK.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to IWRD.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BNK.PA is more volatile compared to IWRD.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNK.PA.Check IWRD.AS's competition here
BNK.PA vs AEME.PA Comparison March 2026
BNK.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNK.PA stands at 2.5B. In comparison, AEME.PA has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BNK.PA is priced at €55.42, while AEME.PA trades at €83.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNK.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.65, whereas AEME.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BNK.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to AEME.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BNK.PA is more volatile compared to AEME.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNK.PA.Check AEME.PA's competition here
BNK.PA vs SJPD.AS Comparison March 2026
BNK.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNK.PA stands at 2.5B. In comparison, SJPD.AS has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BNK.PA is priced at €55.42, while SJPD.AS trades at €7.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNK.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.65, whereas SJPD.AS's P/E ratio is 16.69. In terms of profitability, BNK.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to SJPD.AS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BNK.PA is more volatile compared to SJPD.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNK.PA.Check SJPD.AS's competition here
BNK.PA vs IEMA.AS Comparison March 2026
BNK.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNK.PA stands at 2.5B. In comparison, IEMA.AS has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BNK.PA is priced at €55.42, while IEMA.AS trades at €45.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNK.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.65, whereas IEMA.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BNK.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to IEMA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BNK.PA is more volatile compared to IEMA.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNK.PA.Check IEMA.AS's competition here
BNK.PA vs LCWD.PA Comparison March 2026
BNK.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNK.PA stands at 2.5B. In comparison, LCWD.PA has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, BNK.PA is priced at €55.42, while LCWD.PA trades at €19.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNK.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.65, whereas LCWD.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BNK.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to LCWD.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BNK.PA is more volatile compared to LCWD.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNK.PA.Check LCWD.PA's competition here
BNK.PA vs VEUR.AS Comparison March 2026
BNK.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNK.PA stands at 2.5B. In comparison, VEUR.AS has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BNK.PA is priced at €55.42, while VEUR.AS trades at €44.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNK.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.65, whereas VEUR.AS's P/E ratio is 17.48. In terms of profitability, BNK.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to VEUR.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BNK.PA is more volatile compared to VEUR.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNK.PA.Check VEUR.AS's competition here
BNK.PA vs PHAU.AS Comparison March 2026
BNK.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNK.PA stands at 2.5B. In comparison, PHAU.AS has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BNK.PA is priced at €55.42, while PHAU.AS trades at €364.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNK.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.65, whereas PHAU.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BNK.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to PHAU.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BNK.PA is less volatile compared to PHAU.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNK.PA.Check PHAU.AS's competition here
BNK.PA vs SJPE.AS Comparison March 2026
BNK.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNK.PA stands at 2.5B. In comparison, SJPE.AS has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BNK.PA is priced at €55.42, while SJPE.AS trades at €12.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNK.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.65, whereas SJPE.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BNK.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to SJPE.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BNK.PA is more volatile compared to SJPE.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNK.PA.Check SJPE.AS's competition here
BNK.PA vs ECRP.PA Comparison March 2026
BNK.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNK.PA stands at 2.5B. In comparison, ECRP.PA has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BNK.PA is priced at €55.42, while ECRP.PA trades at €53.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNK.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.65, whereas ECRP.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BNK.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to ECRP.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BNK.PA is more volatile compared to ECRP.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNK.PA.Check ECRP.PA's competition here
BNK.PA vs CC4.PA Comparison March 2026
BNK.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNK.PA stands at 2.5B. In comparison, CC4.PA has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BNK.PA is priced at €55.42, while CC4.PA trades at €223.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNK.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.65, whereas CC4.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BNK.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to CC4.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BNK.PA is more volatile compared to CC4.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNK.PA.Check CC4.PA's competition here
BNK.PA vs IJPA.AS Comparison March 2026
BNK.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNK.PA stands at 2.5B. In comparison, IJPA.AS has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BNK.PA is priced at €55.42, while IJPA.AS trades at €60.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNK.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.65, whereas IJPA.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BNK.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to IJPA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BNK.PA is more volatile compared to IJPA.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNK.PA.Check IJPA.AS's competition here
BNK.PA vs CW8.PA Comparison March 2026
BNK.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNK.PA stands at 2.5B. In comparison, CW8.PA has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BNK.PA is priced at €55.42, while CW8.PA trades at €585.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNK.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.65, whereas CW8.PA's P/E ratio is 23.22. In terms of profitability, BNK.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to CW8.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BNK.PA is more volatile compared to CW8.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNK.PA.Check CW8.PA's competition here
BNK.PA vs TDIV.AS Comparison March 2026
BNK.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNK.PA stands at 2.5B. In comparison, TDIV.AS has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BNK.PA is priced at €55.42, while TDIV.AS trades at €51.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNK.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.65, whereas TDIV.AS's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, BNK.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to TDIV.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BNK.PA is more volatile compared to TDIV.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNK.PA.Check TDIV.AS's competition here
BNK.PA vs EWLD.PA Comparison March 2026
BNK.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNK.PA stands at 2.5B. In comparison, EWLD.PA has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BNK.PA is priced at €55.42, while EWLD.PA trades at €34.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNK.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.65, whereas EWLD.PA's P/E ratio is 23.17. In terms of profitability, BNK.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to EWLD.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BNK.PA is more volatile compared to EWLD.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNK.PA.Check EWLD.PA's competition here
BNK.PA vs 500.PA Comparison March 2026
BNK.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNK.PA stands at 2.5B. In comparison, 500.PA has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BNK.PA is priced at €55.42, while 500.PA trades at €110.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNK.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.65, whereas 500.PA's P/E ratio is 26.09. In terms of profitability, BNK.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to 500.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BNK.PA is more volatile compared to 500.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNK.PA.Check 500.PA's competition here
BNK.PA vs EUEA.AS Comparison March 2026
BNK.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNK.PA stands at 2.5B. In comparison, EUEA.AS has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BNK.PA is priced at €55.42, while EUEA.AS trades at €55.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNK.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.65, whereas EUEA.AS's P/E ratio is 17.43. In terms of profitability, BNK.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to EUEA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BNK.PA is more volatile compared to EUEA.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNK.PA.Check EUEA.AS's competition here
BNK.PA vs AUEM.PA Comparison March 2026
BNK.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNK.PA stands at 2.5B. In comparison, AUEM.PA has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BNK.PA is priced at €55.42, while AUEM.PA trades at €7.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNK.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.65, whereas AUEM.PA's P/E ratio is 16.32. In terms of profitability, BNK.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to AUEM.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BNK.PA is more volatile compared to AUEM.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNK.PA.Check AUEM.PA's competition here
BNK.PA vs KBCA.BR Comparison March 2026
BNK.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNK.PA stands at 2.5B. In comparison, KBCA.BR has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BNK.PA is priced at €55.42, while KBCA.BR trades at €69.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNK.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.65, whereas KBCA.BR's P/E ratio is 16.83. In terms of profitability, BNK.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to KBCA.BR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BNK.PA is less volatile compared to KBCA.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNK.PA.Check KBCA.BR's competition here
BNK.PA vs REINA.AS Comparison March 2026
BNK.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNK.PA stands at 2.5B. In comparison, REINA.AS has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BNK.PA is priced at €55.42, while REINA.AS trades at €28.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNK.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.65, whereas REINA.AS's P/E ratio is 37.84. In terms of profitability, BNK.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to REINA.AS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BNK.PA is less volatile compared to REINA.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNK.PA.Check REINA.AS's competition here
BNK.PA vs UST.PA Comparison March 2026
BNK.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNK.PA stands at 2.5B. In comparison, UST.PA has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BNK.PA is priced at €55.42, while UST.PA trades at €82.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNK.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.65, whereas UST.PA's P/E ratio is 31.33. In terms of profitability, BNK.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to UST.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BNK.PA is less volatile compared to UST.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNK.PA.Check UST.PA's competition here
BNK.PA vs ALLFG.AS Comparison March 2026
BNK.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNK.PA stands at 2.5B. In comparison, ALLFG.AS has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BNK.PA is priced at €55.42, while ALLFG.AS trades at €8.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNK.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.65, whereas ALLFG.AS's P/E ratio is -32.08. In terms of profitability, BNK.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to ALLFG.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BNK.PA is more volatile compared to ALLFG.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNK.PA.Check ALLFG.AS's competition here
BNK.PA vs S500.PA Comparison March 2026
BNK.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNK.PA stands at 2.5B. In comparison, S500.PA has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, BNK.PA is priced at €55.42, while S500.PA trades at €162.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNK.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.65, whereas S500.PA's P/E ratio is 26.84. In terms of profitability, BNK.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to S500.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BNK.PA is more volatile compared to S500.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNK.PA.Check S500.PA's competition here
BNK.PA vs S500H.PA Comparison March 2026
BNK.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNK.PA stands at 2.5B. In comparison, S500H.PA has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, BNK.PA is priced at €55.42, while S500H.PA trades at €90.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNK.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.65, whereas S500H.PA's P/E ratio is 25.85. In terms of profitability, BNK.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to S500H.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BNK.PA is more volatile compared to S500H.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNK.PA.Check S500H.PA's competition here
BNK.PA vs C50U.PA Comparison March 2026
BNK.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNK.PA stands at 2.5B. In comparison, C50U.PA has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BNK.PA is priced at €55.42, while C50U.PA trades at €167.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNK.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.65, whereas C50U.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BNK.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to C50U.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BNK.PA is more volatile compared to C50U.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNK.PA.Check C50U.PA's competition here
BNK.PA vs USA.PA Comparison March 2026
BNK.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNK.PA stands at 2.5B. In comparison, USA.PA has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BNK.PA is priced at €55.42, while USA.PA trades at €507.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNK.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.65, whereas USA.PA's P/E ratio is 26.35. In terms of profitability, BNK.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to USA.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BNK.PA is more volatile compared to USA.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNK.PA.Check USA.PA's competition here
BNK.PA vs USAC.PA Comparison March 2026
BNK.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNK.PA stands at 2.5B. In comparison, USAC.PA has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BNK.PA is priced at €55.42, while USAC.PA trades at €555.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNK.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.65, whereas USAC.PA's P/E ratio is 26.63. In terms of profitability, BNK.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to USAC.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BNK.PA is more volatile compared to USAC.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNK.PA.Check USAC.PA's competition here
BNK.PA vs AEEM.PA Comparison March 2026
BNK.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNK.PA stands at 2.5B. In comparison, AEEM.PA has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BNK.PA is priced at €55.42, while AEEM.PA trades at €6.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNK.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.65, whereas AEEM.PA's P/E ratio is 14.86. In terms of profitability, BNK.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to AEEM.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BNK.PA is more volatile compared to AEEM.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNK.PA.Check AEEM.PA's competition here
BNK.PA vs EXCH.AS Comparison March 2026
BNK.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNK.PA stands at 2.5B. In comparison, EXCH.AS has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BNK.PA is priced at €55.42, while EXCH.AS trades at €7.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNK.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.65, whereas EXCH.AS's P/E ratio is 15.65. In terms of profitability, BNK.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to EXCH.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BNK.PA is more volatile compared to EXCH.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNK.PA.Check EXCH.AS's competition here
BNK.PA vs VERX.AS Comparison March 2026
BNK.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNK.PA stands at 2.5B. In comparison, VERX.AS has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BNK.PA is priced at €55.42, while VERX.AS trades at €44.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNK.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.65, whereas VERX.AS's P/E ratio is 17.27. In terms of profitability, BNK.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to VERX.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BNK.PA is more volatile compared to VERX.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNK.PA.Check VERX.AS's competition here
BNK.PA vs SEMD.AS Comparison March 2026
BNK.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNK.PA stands at 2.5B. In comparison, SEMD.AS has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BNK.PA is priced at €55.42, while SEMD.AS trades at €6.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNK.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.65, whereas SEMD.AS's P/E ratio is 16.58. In terms of profitability, BNK.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to SEMD.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BNK.PA is more volatile compared to SEMD.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNK.PA.Check SEMD.AS's competition here
BNK.PA vs CACC.PA Comparison March 2026
BNK.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNK.PA stands at 2.5B. In comparison, CACC.PA has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BNK.PA is priced at €55.42, while CACC.PA trades at €38.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNK.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.65, whereas CACC.PA's P/E ratio is 16.86. In terms of profitability, BNK.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to CACC.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BNK.PA is more volatile compared to CACC.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNK.PA.Check CACC.PA's competition here
BNK.PA vs CAC.PA Comparison March 2026
BNK.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNK.PA stands at 2.5B. In comparison, CAC.PA has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BNK.PA is priced at €55.42, while CAC.PA trades at €76.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNK.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.65, whereas CAC.PA's P/E ratio is 16.85. In terms of profitability, BNK.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to CAC.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BNK.PA is more volatile compared to CAC.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNK.PA.Check CAC.PA's competition here
BNK.PA vs MSE.PA Comparison March 2026
BNK.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNK.PA stands at 2.5B. In comparison, MSE.PA has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BNK.PA is priced at €55.42, while MSE.PA trades at €61.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNK.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.65, whereas MSE.PA's P/E ratio is 16.89. In terms of profitability, BNK.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to MSE.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BNK.PA is more volatile compared to MSE.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNK.PA.Check MSE.PA's competition here
BNK.PA vs CD5.PA Comparison March 2026
BNK.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNK.PA stands at 2.5B. In comparison, CD5.PA has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BNK.PA is priced at €55.42, while CD5.PA trades at €87.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNK.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.65, whereas CD5.PA's P/E ratio is 16.91. In terms of profitability, BNK.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to CD5.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BNK.PA is more volatile compared to CD5.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNK.PA.Check CD5.PA's competition here
BNK.PA vs C50.PA Comparison March 2026
BNK.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNK.PA stands at 2.5B. In comparison, C50.PA has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BNK.PA is priced at €55.42, while C50.PA trades at €145.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNK.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.65, whereas C50.PA's P/E ratio is 16.94. In terms of profitability, BNK.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to C50.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BNK.PA is more volatile compared to C50.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNK.PA.Check C50.PA's competition here
BNK.PA vs ICHD.AS Comparison March 2026
BNK.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNK.PA stands at 2.5B. In comparison, ICHD.AS has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BNK.PA is priced at €55.42, while ICHD.AS trades at €4.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNK.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.65, whereas ICHD.AS's P/E ratio is 12.20. In terms of profitability, BNK.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to ICHD.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BNK.PA is more volatile compared to ICHD.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNK.PA.Check ICHD.AS's competition here
BNK.PA vs ICHN.AS Comparison March 2026
BNK.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNK.PA stands at 2.5B. In comparison, ICHN.AS has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BNK.PA is priced at €55.42, while ICHN.AS trades at €5.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNK.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.65, whereas ICHN.AS's P/E ratio is 12.19. In terms of profitability, BNK.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to ICHN.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BNK.PA is more volatile compared to ICHN.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNK.PA.Check ICHN.AS's competition here
BNK.PA vs 500X.AS Comparison March 2026
BNK.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNK.PA stands at 2.5B. In comparison, 500X.AS has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BNK.PA is priced at €55.42, while 500X.AS trades at €40.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNK.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.65, whereas 500X.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BNK.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to 500X.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BNK.PA is more volatile compared to 500X.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNK.PA.Check 500X.AS's competition here
BNK.PA vs WSRI.PA Comparison March 2026
BNK.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNK.PA stands at 2.5B. In comparison, WSRI.PA has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, BNK.PA is priced at €55.42, while WSRI.PA trades at €103.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNK.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.65, whereas WSRI.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BNK.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to WSRI.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BNK.PA is more volatile compared to WSRI.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNK.PA.Check WSRI.PA's competition here
BNK.PA vs EEUE.PA Comparison March 2026
BNK.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNK.PA stands at 2.5B. In comparison, EEUE.PA has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BNK.PA is priced at €55.42, while EEUE.PA trades at €17.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNK.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.65, whereas EEUE.PA's P/E ratio is 17.82. In terms of profitability, BNK.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to EEUE.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BNK.PA is more volatile compared to EEUE.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNK.PA.Check EEUE.PA's competition here
BNK.PA vs AGGD.AS Comparison March 2026
BNK.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNK.PA stands at 2.5B. In comparison, AGGD.AS has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BNK.PA is priced at €55.42, while AGGD.AS trades at €5.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNK.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.65, whereas AGGD.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BNK.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to AGGD.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BNK.PA is more volatile compared to AGGD.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNK.PA.Check AGGD.AS's competition here
BNK.PA vs GLUH.AS Comparison March 2026
BNK.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNK.PA stands at 2.5B. In comparison, GLUH.AS has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BNK.PA is priced at €55.42, while GLUH.AS trades at €4.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNK.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.65, whereas GLUH.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BNK.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to GLUH.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BNK.PA is more volatile compared to GLUH.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNK.PA.Check GLUH.AS's competition here
BNK.PA vs SRIL.AS Comparison March 2026
BNK.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNK.PA stands at 2.5B. In comparison, SRIL.AS has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BNK.PA is priced at €55.42, while SRIL.AS trades at €11.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNK.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.65, whereas SRIL.AS's P/E ratio is 23.03. In terms of profitability, BNK.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to SRIL.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BNK.PA is more volatile compared to SRIL.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNK.PA.Check SRIL.AS's competition here
BNK.PA vs EHYD.AS Comparison March 2026
BNK.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNK.PA stands at 2.5B. In comparison, EHYD.AS has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BNK.PA is priced at €55.42, while EHYD.AS trades at €4.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNK.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.65, whereas EHYD.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BNK.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to EHYD.AS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BNK.PA is more volatile compared to EHYD.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNK.PA.Check EHYD.AS's competition here
BNK.PA vs GEMU.PA Comparison March 2026
BNK.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNK.PA stands at 2.5B. In comparison, GEMU.PA has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BNK.PA is priced at €55.42, while GEMU.PA trades at €9.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNK.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.65, whereas GEMU.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BNK.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to GEMU.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BNK.PA is more volatile compared to GEMU.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNK.PA.Check GEMU.PA's competition here
BNK.PA vs ROLA.AS Comparison March 2026
BNK.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNK.PA stands at 2.5B. In comparison, ROLA.AS has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BNK.PA is priced at €55.42, while ROLA.AS trades at €62.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNK.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.65, whereas ROLA.AS's P/E ratio is 6.22. In terms of profitability, BNK.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to ROLA.AS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BNK.PA is more volatile compared to ROLA.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNK.PA.Check ROLA.AS's competition here
BNK.PA vs EHYA.AS Comparison March 2026
BNK.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNK.PA stands at 2.5B. In comparison, EHYA.AS has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BNK.PA is priced at €55.42, while EHYA.AS trades at €5.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNK.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.65, whereas EHYA.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BNK.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to EHYA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BNK.PA is more volatile compared to EHYA.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNK.PA.Check EHYA.AS's competition here
BNK.PA vs WESE.PA Comparison March 2026
BNK.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNK.PA stands at 2.5B. In comparison, WESE.PA has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BNK.PA is priced at €55.42, while WESE.PA trades at €72.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNK.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.65, whereas WESE.PA's P/E ratio is 23.66. In terms of profitability, BNK.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to WESE.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BNK.PA is more volatile compared to WESE.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNK.PA.Check WESE.PA's competition here
BNK.PA vs CB3.PA Comparison March 2026
BNK.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNK.PA stands at 2.5B. In comparison, CB3.PA has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BNK.PA is priced at €55.42, while CB3.PA trades at €217.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNK.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.65, whereas CB3.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BNK.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to CB3.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BNK.PA is more volatile compared to CB3.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNK.PA.Check CB3.PA's competition here
BNK.PA vs MF.PA Comparison March 2026
BNK.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNK.PA stands at 2.5B. In comparison, MF.PA has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BNK.PA is priced at €55.42, while MF.PA trades at €75.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNK.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.65, whereas MF.PA's P/E ratio is -18.77. In terms of profitability, BNK.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to MF.PA's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BNK.PA is more volatile compared to MF.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNK.PA.Check MF.PA's competition here
BNK.PA vs IDSE.AS Comparison March 2026
BNK.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNK.PA stands at 2.5B. In comparison, IDSE.AS has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BNK.PA is priced at €55.42, while IDSE.AS trades at €133.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNK.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.65, whereas IDSE.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BNK.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to IDSE.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BNK.PA is more volatile compared to IDSE.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNK.PA.Check IDSE.AS's competition here
BNK.PA vs ISED.AS Comparison March 2026
BNK.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNK.PA stands at 2.5B. In comparison, ISED.AS has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BNK.PA is priced at €55.42, while ISED.AS trades at €7.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNK.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.65, whereas ISED.AS's P/E ratio is 19.28. In terms of profitability, BNK.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to ISED.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BNK.PA is more volatile compared to ISED.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNK.PA.Check ISED.AS's competition here
BNK.PA vs IMBE.AS Comparison March 2026
BNK.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNK.PA stands at 2.5B. In comparison, IMBE.AS has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BNK.PA is priced at €55.42, while IMBE.AS trades at €4.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNK.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.65, whereas IMBE.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BNK.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to IMBE.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BNK.PA is more volatile compared to IMBE.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNK.PA.Check IMBE.AS's competition here
BNK.PA vs BNKE.PA Comparison March 2026
BNK.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNK.PA stands at 2.5B. In comparison, BNKE.PA has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, BNK.PA is priced at €55.42, while BNKE.PA trades at €289.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNK.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.65, whereas BNKE.PA's P/E ratio is 10.31. In terms of profitability, BNK.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to BNKE.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BNK.PA is less volatile compared to BNKE.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNK.PA.Check BNKE.PA's competition here
BNK.PA vs BREB.BR Comparison March 2026
BNK.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNK.PA stands at 2.5B. In comparison, BREB.BR has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BNK.PA is priced at €55.42, while BREB.BR trades at €100.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNK.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.65, whereas BREB.BR's P/E ratio is 23.67. In terms of profitability, BNK.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to BREB.BR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BNK.PA is more volatile compared to BREB.BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNK.PA.Check BREB.BR's competition here
BNK.PA vs ESE.PA Comparison March 2026
BNK.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNK.PA stands at 2.5B. In comparison, ESE.PA has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BNK.PA is priced at €55.42, while ESE.PA trades at €28.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNK.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.65, whereas ESE.PA's P/E ratio is 26.07. In terms of profitability, BNK.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to ESE.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BNK.PA is more volatile compared to ESE.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNK.PA.Check ESE.PA's competition here
BNK.PA vs SGLU.AS Comparison March 2026
BNK.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNK.PA stands at 2.5B. In comparison, SGLU.AS has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BNK.PA is priced at €55.42, while SGLU.AS trades at €5.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNK.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.65, whereas SGLU.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BNK.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to SGLU.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BNK.PA is more volatile compared to SGLU.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNK.PA.Check SGLU.AS's competition here
BNK.PA vs PHAG.AS Comparison March 2026
BNK.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNK.PA stands at 2.5B. In comparison, PHAG.AS has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BNK.PA is priced at €55.42, while PHAG.AS trades at €55.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNK.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.65, whereas PHAG.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BNK.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to PHAG.AS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BNK.PA is less volatile compared to PHAG.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNK.PA.Check PHAG.AS's competition here
BNK.PA vs SUOA.AS Comparison March 2026
BNK.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNK.PA stands at 2.5B. In comparison, SUOA.AS has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BNK.PA is priced at €55.42, while SUOA.AS trades at €5.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNK.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.65, whereas SUOA.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BNK.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to SUOA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BNK.PA is more volatile compared to SUOA.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNK.PA.Check SUOA.AS's competition here
BNK.PA vs TKO.PA Comparison March 2026
BNK.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNK.PA stands at 2.5B. In comparison, TKO.PA has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BNK.PA is priced at €55.42, while TKO.PA trades at €15.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNK.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.65, whereas TKO.PA's P/E ratio is 67.91. In terms of profitability, BNK.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to TKO.PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BNK.PA is less volatile compared to TKO.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNK.PA.Check TKO.PA's competition here
BNK.PA vs EPAB.PA Comparison March 2026
BNK.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNK.PA stands at 2.5B. In comparison, EPAB.PA has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BNK.PA is priced at €55.42, while EPAB.PA trades at €36.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNK.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.65, whereas EPAB.PA's P/E ratio is 15.45. In terms of profitability, BNK.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to EPAB.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BNK.PA is more volatile compared to EPAB.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNK.PA.Check EPAB.PA's competition here
BNK.PA vs TI5A.AS Comparison March 2026
BNK.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNK.PA stands at 2.5B. In comparison, TI5A.AS has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BNK.PA is priced at €55.42, while TI5A.AS trades at €115.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNK.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.65, whereas TI5A.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BNK.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to TI5A.AS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BNK.PA is more volatile compared to TI5A.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNK.PA.Check TI5A.AS's competition here
BNK.PA vs RF.PA Comparison March 2026
BNK.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNK.PA stands at 2.5B. In comparison, RF.PA has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BNK.PA is priced at €55.42, while RF.PA trades at €38.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNK.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.65, whereas RF.PA's P/E ratio is -4.35. In terms of profitability, BNK.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to RF.PA's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BNK.PA is more volatile compared to RF.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNK.PA.Check RF.PA's competition here
BNK.PA vs JAPB.AS Comparison March 2026
BNK.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNK.PA stands at 2.5B. In comparison, JAPB.AS has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BNK.PA is priced at €55.42, while JAPB.AS trades at €922.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNK.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.65, whereas JAPB.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BNK.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to JAPB.AS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BNK.PA is more volatile compared to JAPB.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNK.PA.Check JAPB.AS's competition here
BNK.PA vs SEMI.AS Comparison March 2026
BNK.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNK.PA stands at 2.5B. In comparison, SEMI.AS has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BNK.PA is priced at €55.42, while SEMI.AS trades at €12.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNK.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.65, whereas SEMI.AS's P/E ratio is 35.46. In terms of profitability, BNK.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to SEMI.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BNK.PA is less volatile compared to SEMI.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNK.PA.Check SEMI.AS's competition here
BNK.PA vs IGLE.AS Comparison March 2026
BNK.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNK.PA stands at 2.5B. In comparison, IGLE.AS has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BNK.PA is priced at €55.42, while IGLE.AS trades at €3.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNK.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.65, whereas IGLE.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BNK.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to IGLE.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BNK.PA is more volatile compared to IGLE.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNK.PA.Check IGLE.AS's competition here
BNK.PA vs TNOW.PA Comparison March 2026
BNK.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNK.PA stands at 2.5B. In comparison, TNOW.PA has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BNK.PA is priced at €55.42, while TNOW.PA trades at €868.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNK.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.65, whereas TNOW.PA's P/E ratio is 33.54. In terms of profitability, BNK.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to TNOW.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BNK.PA is less volatile compared to TNOW.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNK.PA.Check TNOW.PA's competition here
BNK.PA vs ANX.PA Comparison March 2026
BNK.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNK.PA stands at 2.5B. In comparison, ANX.PA has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BNK.PA is priced at €55.42, while ANX.PA trades at €231.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNK.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.65, whereas ANX.PA's P/E ratio is 31.36. In terms of profitability, BNK.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to ANX.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BNK.PA is more volatile compared to ANX.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNK.PA.Check ANX.PA's competition here
BNK.PA vs IUHE.AS Comparison March 2026
BNK.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNK.PA stands at 2.5B. In comparison, IUHE.AS has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BNK.PA is priced at €55.42, while IUHE.AS trades at €6.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNK.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.65, whereas IUHE.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BNK.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to IUHE.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BNK.PA is more volatile compared to IUHE.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNK.PA.Check IUHE.AS's competition here
BNK.PA vs AASI.PA Comparison March 2026
BNK.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNK.PA stands at 2.5B. In comparison, AASI.PA has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BNK.PA is priced at €55.42, while AASI.PA trades at €46.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNK.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.65, whereas AASI.PA's P/E ratio is 15.43. In terms of profitability, BNK.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to AASI.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BNK.PA is more volatile compared to AASI.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNK.PA.Check AASI.PA's competition here
BNK.PA vs USRI.PA Comparison March 2026
BNK.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNK.PA stands at 2.5B. In comparison, USRI.PA has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BNK.PA is priced at €55.42, while USRI.PA trades at €102.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNK.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.65, whereas USRI.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BNK.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to USRI.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BNK.PA is more volatile compared to USRI.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNK.PA.Check USRI.PA's competition here
BNK.PA vs ACWI.PA Comparison March 2026
BNK.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNK.PA stands at 2.5B. In comparison, ACWI.PA has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, BNK.PA is priced at €55.42, while ACWI.PA trades at €512.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNK.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.65, whereas ACWI.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BNK.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to ACWI.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BNK.PA is more volatile compared to ACWI.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNK.PA.Check ACWI.PA's competition here
BNK.PA vs EXA1.AS Comparison March 2026
BNK.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNK.PA stands at 2.5B. In comparison, EXA1.AS has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, BNK.PA is priced at €55.42, while EXA1.AS trades at €15.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNK.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.65, whereas EXA1.AS's P/E ratio is 9.74. In terms of profitability, BNK.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to EXA1.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BNK.PA is less volatile compared to EXA1.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNK.PA.Check EXA1.AS's competition here