Brambles Limited
Brambles Limited (BMBLF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (BMBLF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Specialty Business Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMBLF | $17.69 | +0.01% | 23.6B | 28.05 | $0.62 | +2.45% |
| BXBLY | $34.50 | -0.17% | 23.6B | 25.69 | $1.34 | +2.21% |
| WOLTF | $72.12 | +0.00% | 16.9B | 14.06 | $5.31 | +3.80% |
| WTKWY | $73.35 | +0.00% | 16.5B | 12.96 | $5.65 | +3.46% |
| RKLIF | $6.06 | +0.00% | 15.2B | 46.62 | $0.13 | +1.95% |
| IKTSF | $63.27 | -0.50% | 9.7B | 20.68 | $3.06 | +3.41% |
| IKTSY | $61.29 | -0.16% | 9.4B | 20.16 | $3.04 | +3.30% |
| INPOF | $18.02 | +11.51% | 9B | 36.04 | $0.50 | N/A |
| DNPLY | $9.84 | +0.00% | 8.9B | 12.72 | $0.78 | +0.97% |
| INPOY | $8.92 | +0.90% | 8.9B | 35.64 | $0.25 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
BMBLF vs BXBLY Comparison February 2026
BMBLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMBLF stands at 23.6B. In comparison, BXBLY has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BMBLF is priced at $17.69, while BXBLY trades at $34.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMBLF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.05, whereas BXBLY's P/E ratio is 25.69. In terms of profitability, BMBLF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to BXBLY's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, BMBLF is less volatile compared to BXBLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMBLF.Check BXBLY's competition here
BMBLF vs WOLTF Comparison February 2026
BMBLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMBLF stands at 23.6B. In comparison, WOLTF has a market cap of 16.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BMBLF is priced at $17.69, while WOLTF trades at $72.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMBLF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.05, whereas WOLTF's P/E ratio is 14.06. In terms of profitability, BMBLF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to WOLTF's ROE of +0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, BMBLF is less volatile compared to WOLTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMBLF.Check WOLTF's competition here
BMBLF vs WTKWY Comparison February 2026
BMBLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMBLF stands at 23.6B. In comparison, WTKWY has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BMBLF is priced at $17.69, while WTKWY trades at $73.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMBLF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.05, whereas WTKWY's P/E ratio is 12.96. In terms of profitability, BMBLF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to WTKWY's ROE of +0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, BMBLF is less volatile compared to WTKWY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMBLF.Check WTKWY's competition here
BMBLF vs RKLIF Comparison February 2026
BMBLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMBLF stands at 23.6B. In comparison, RKLIF has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BMBLF is priced at $17.69, while RKLIF trades at $6.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMBLF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.05, whereas RKLIF's P/E ratio is 46.62. In terms of profitability, BMBLF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to RKLIF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BMBLF is more volatile compared to RKLIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMBLF.Check RKLIF's competition here
BMBLF vs IKTSF Comparison February 2026
BMBLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMBLF stands at 23.6B. In comparison, IKTSF has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BMBLF is priced at $17.69, while IKTSF trades at $63.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMBLF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.05, whereas IKTSF's P/E ratio is 20.68. In terms of profitability, BMBLF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to IKTSF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, BMBLF is less volatile compared to IKTSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMBLF.Check IKTSF's competition here
BMBLF vs IKTSY Comparison February 2026
BMBLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMBLF stands at 23.6B. In comparison, IKTSY has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BMBLF is priced at $17.69, while IKTSY trades at $61.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMBLF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.05, whereas IKTSY's P/E ratio is 20.16. In terms of profitability, BMBLF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to IKTSY's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, BMBLF is less volatile compared to IKTSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMBLF.Check IKTSY's competition here
BMBLF vs INPOF Comparison February 2026
BMBLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMBLF stands at 23.6B. In comparison, INPOF has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, BMBLF is priced at $17.69, while INPOF trades at $18.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMBLF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.05, whereas INPOF's P/E ratio is 36.04. In terms of profitability, BMBLF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to INPOF's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, BMBLF is more volatile compared to INPOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMBLF.Check INPOF's competition here
BMBLF vs DNPLY Comparison February 2026
BMBLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMBLF stands at 23.6B. In comparison, DNPLY has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BMBLF is priced at $17.69, while DNPLY trades at $9.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMBLF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.05, whereas DNPLY's P/E ratio is 12.72. In terms of profitability, BMBLF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to DNPLY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BMBLF is less volatile compared to DNPLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMBLF.Check DNPLY's competition here
BMBLF vs INPOY Comparison February 2026
BMBLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMBLF stands at 23.6B. In comparison, INPOY has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BMBLF is priced at $17.69, while INPOY trades at $8.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMBLF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.05, whereas INPOY's P/E ratio is 35.64. In terms of profitability, BMBLF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to INPOY's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, BMBLF is less volatile compared to INPOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMBLF.Check INPOY's competition here
BMBLF vs SDXAY Comparison February 2026
BMBLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMBLF stands at 23.6B. In comparison, SDXAY has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BMBLF is priced at $17.69, while SDXAY trades at $11.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMBLF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.05, whereas SDXAY's P/E ratio is 10.08. In terms of profitability, BMBLF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SDXAY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BMBLF is less volatile compared to SDXAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMBLF.Check SDXAY's competition here
BMBLF vs SDXOF Comparison February 2026
BMBLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMBLF stands at 23.6B. In comparison, SDXOF has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BMBLF is priced at $17.69, while SDXOF trades at $56.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMBLF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.05, whereas SDXOF's P/E ratio is 10.12. In terms of profitability, BMBLF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SDXOF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BMBLF is more volatile compared to SDXOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMBLF.Check SDXOF's competition here
BMBLF vs DNPCF Comparison February 2026
BMBLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMBLF stands at 23.6B. In comparison, DNPCF has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BMBLF is priced at $17.69, while DNPCF trades at $18.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMBLF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.05, whereas DNPCF's P/E ratio is 11.93. In terms of profitability, BMBLF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to DNPCF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BMBLF is more volatile compared to DNPCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMBLF.Check DNPCF's competition here
BMBLF vs TONPF Comparison February 2026
BMBLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMBLF stands at 23.6B. In comparison, TONPF has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, BMBLF is priced at $17.69, while TONPF trades at $28.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMBLF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.05, whereas TONPF's P/E ratio is 14.67. In terms of profitability, BMBLF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to TONPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BMBLF is more volatile compared to TONPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMBLF.Check TONPF's competition here
BMBLF vs TOPPY Comparison February 2026
BMBLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMBLF stands at 23.6B. In comparison, TOPPY has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BMBLF is priced at $17.69, while TOPPY trades at $16.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMBLF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.05, whereas TOPPY's P/E ratio is 14.58. In terms of profitability, BMBLF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to TOPPY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BMBLF is more volatile compared to TOPPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMBLF.Check TOPPY's competition here
BMBLF vs ELSSF Comparison February 2026
BMBLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMBLF stands at 23.6B. In comparison, ELSSF has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BMBLF is priced at $17.69, while ELSSF trades at $31.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMBLF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.05, whereas ELSSF's P/E ratio is 18.17. In terms of profitability, BMBLF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ELSSF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BMBLF is more volatile compared to ELSSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMBLF.Check ELSSF's competition here
BMBLF vs CTAGY Comparison February 2026
BMBLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMBLF stands at 23.6B. In comparison, CTAGY has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BMBLF is priced at $17.69, while CTAGY trades at $17.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMBLF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.05, whereas CTAGY's P/E ratio is 23.42. In terms of profitability, BMBLF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CTAGY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BMBLF is more volatile compared to CTAGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMBLF.Check CTAGY's competition here
BMBLF vs ISFFF Comparison February 2026
BMBLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMBLF stands at 23.6B. In comparison, ISFFF has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BMBLF is priced at $17.69, while ISFFF trades at $32.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMBLF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.05, whereas ISFFF's P/E ratio is 13.37. In terms of profitability, BMBLF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ISFFF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, BMBLF is more volatile compared to ISFFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMBLF.Check ISFFF's competition here
BMBLF vs TLPFF Comparison February 2026
BMBLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMBLF stands at 23.6B. In comparison, TLPFF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BMBLF is priced at $17.69, while TLPFF trades at $61.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMBLF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.05, whereas TLPFF's P/E ratio is 6.22. In terms of profitability, BMBLF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to TLPFF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BMBLF is less volatile compared to TLPFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMBLF.Check TLPFF's competition here
BMBLF vs SCGPY Comparison February 2026
BMBLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMBLF stands at 23.6B. In comparison, SCGPY has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BMBLF is priced at $17.69, while SCGPY trades at $3.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMBLF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.05, whereas SCGPY's P/E ratio is 52.14. In terms of profitability, BMBLF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SCGPY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BMBLF is more volatile compared to SCGPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMBLF.Check SCGPY's competition here
BMBLF vs TLPFY Comparison February 2026
BMBLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMBLF stands at 23.6B. In comparison, TLPFY has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BMBLF is priced at $17.69, while TLPFY trades at $29.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMBLF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.05, whereas TLPFY's P/E ratio is 6.40. In terms of profitability, BMBLF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to TLPFY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BMBLF is less volatile compared to TLPFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMBLF.Check TLPFY's competition here
BMBLF vs SECCF Comparison February 2026
BMBLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMBLF stands at 23.6B. In comparison, SECCF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BMBLF is priced at $17.69, while SECCF trades at $3.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMBLF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.05, whereas SECCF's P/E ratio is 50.57. In terms of profitability, BMBLF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SECCF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BMBLF is more volatile compared to SECCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMBLF.Check SECCF's competition here
BMBLF vs MITFF Comparison February 2026
BMBLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMBLF stands at 23.6B. In comparison, MITFF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BMBLF is priced at $17.69, while MITFF trades at $2.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMBLF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.05, whereas MITFF's P/E ratio is 24.50. In terms of profitability, BMBLF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to MITFF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BMBLF is more volatile compared to MITFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMBLF.Check MITFF's competition here
BMBLF vs MITFY Comparison February 2026
BMBLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMBLF stands at 23.6B. In comparison, MITFY has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BMBLF is priced at $17.69, while MITFY trades at $9.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMBLF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.05, whereas MITFY's P/E ratio is 24.38. In terms of profitability, BMBLF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to MITFY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BMBLF is less volatile compared to MITFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMBLF.Check MITFY's competition here
BMBLF vs ACENY Comparison February 2026
BMBLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMBLF stands at 23.6B. In comparison, ACENY has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BMBLF is priced at $17.69, while ACENY trades at $9.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMBLF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.05, whereas ACENY's P/E ratio is 28.44. In terms of profitability, BMBLF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ACENY's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, BMBLF is less volatile compared to ACENY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMBLF.Check ACENY's competition here
BMBLF vs APLUF Comparison February 2026
BMBLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMBLF stands at 23.6B. In comparison, APLUF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BMBLF is priced at $17.69, while APLUF trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMBLF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.05, whereas APLUF's P/E ratio is 27.27. In terms of profitability, BMBLF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to APLUF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BMBLF is less volatile compared to APLUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMBLF.Check APLUF's competition here
BMBLF vs RELOF Comparison February 2026
BMBLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMBLF stands at 23.6B. In comparison, RELOF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BMBLF is priced at $17.69, while RELOF trades at $11.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMBLF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.05, whereas RELOF's P/E ratio is 14.10. In terms of profitability, BMBLF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to RELOF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, BMBLF is more volatile compared to RELOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMBLF.Check RELOF's competition here
BMBLF vs ISSDY Comparison February 2026
BMBLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMBLF stands at 23.6B. In comparison, ISSDY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BMBLF is priced at $17.69, while ISSDY trades at $9.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMBLF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.05, whereas ISSDY's P/E ratio is 12.57. In terms of profitability, BMBLF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ISSDY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BMBLF is less volatile compared to ISSDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMBLF.Check ISSDY's competition here
BMBLF vs TCLAF Comparison February 2026
BMBLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMBLF stands at 23.6B. In comparison, TCLAF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BMBLF is priced at $17.69, while TCLAF trades at $17.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMBLF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.05, whereas TCLAF's P/E ratio is 11.54. In terms of profitability, BMBLF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to TCLAF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BMBLF is more volatile compared to TCLAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMBLF.Check TCLAF's competition here
BMBLF vs TCLCF Comparison February 2026
BMBLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMBLF stands at 23.6B. In comparison, TCLCF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BMBLF is priced at $17.69, while TCLCF trades at $12.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMBLF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.05, whereas TCLCF's P/E ratio is 8.63. In terms of profitability, BMBLF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to TCLCF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BMBLF is more volatile compared to TCLCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMBLF.Check TCLCF's competition here
BMBLF vs DLUEY Comparison February 2026
BMBLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMBLF stands at 23.6B. In comparison, DLUEY has a market cap of 979.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BMBLF is priced at $17.69, while DLUEY trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMBLF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.05, whereas DLUEY's P/E ratio is -15.63. In terms of profitability, BMBLF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to DLUEY's ROE of -5.33%. Regarding short-term risk, BMBLF is more volatile compared to DLUEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMBLF.Check DLUEY's competition here
BMBLF vs STGXF Comparison February 2026
BMBLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMBLF stands at 23.6B. In comparison, STGXF has a market cap of 789.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BMBLF is priced at $17.69, while STGXF trades at $5.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMBLF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.05, whereas STGXF's P/E ratio is 13.53. In terms of profitability, BMBLF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to STGXF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, BMBLF is more volatile compared to STGXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMBLF.Check STGXF's competition here
BMBLF vs JSVGF Comparison February 2026
BMBLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMBLF stands at 23.6B. In comparison, JSVGF has a market cap of 683.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BMBLF is priced at $17.69, while JSVGF trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMBLF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.05, whereas JSVGF's P/E ratio is 117.73. In terms of profitability, BMBLF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to JSVGF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BMBLF is more volatile compared to JSVGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMBLF.Check JSVGF's competition here
BMBLF vs GDIFF Comparison February 2026
BMBLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMBLF stands at 23.6B. In comparison, GDIFF has a market cap of 620.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BMBLF is priced at $17.69, while GDIFF trades at $26.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMBLF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.05, whereas GDIFF's P/E ratio is 20.13. In terms of profitability, BMBLF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to GDIFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BMBLF is more volatile compared to GDIFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMBLF.Check GDIFF's competition here
BMBLF vs CLNFF Comparison February 2026
BMBLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMBLF stands at 23.6B. In comparison, CLNFF has a market cap of 617M. Regarding current trading prices, BMBLF is priced at $17.69, while CLNFF trades at $56.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMBLF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.05, whereas CLNFF's P/E ratio is 32.38. In terms of profitability, BMBLF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CLNFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BMBLF is less volatile compared to CLNFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMBLF.Check CLNFF's competition here
BMBLF vs HZNOF Comparison February 2026
BMBLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMBLF stands at 23.6B. In comparison, HZNOF has a market cap of 597.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BMBLF is priced at $17.69, while HZNOF trades at $9.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMBLF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.05, whereas HZNOF's P/E ratio is 20.00. In terms of profitability, BMBLF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to HZNOF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BMBLF is more volatile compared to HZNOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMBLF.Check HZNOF's competition here
BMBLF vs IRMTF Comparison February 2026
BMBLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMBLF stands at 23.6B. In comparison, IRMTF has a market cap of 595.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BMBLF is priced at $17.69, while IRMTF trades at $31.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMBLF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.05, whereas IRMTF's P/E ratio is 29.47. In terms of profitability, BMBLF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to IRMTF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BMBLF is more volatile compared to IRMTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMBLF.Check IRMTF's competition here
BMBLF vs IPHLF Comparison February 2026
BMBLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMBLF stands at 23.6B. In comparison, IPHLF has a market cap of 546.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BMBLF is priced at $17.69, while IPHLF trades at $2.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMBLF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.05, whereas IPHLF's P/E ratio is 11.61. In terms of profitability, BMBLF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to IPHLF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BMBLF is less volatile compared to IPHLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMBLF.Check IPHLF's competition here
BMBLF vs GLCDF Comparison February 2026
BMBLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMBLF stands at 23.6B. In comparison, GLCDF has a market cap of 540.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BMBLF is priced at $17.69, while GLCDF trades at $18.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMBLF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.05, whereas GLCDF's P/E ratio is 8.89. In terms of profitability, BMBLF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to GLCDF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BMBLF is more volatile compared to GLCDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMBLF.Check GLCDF's competition here
BMBLF vs RKSLF Comparison February 2026
BMBLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMBLF stands at 23.6B. In comparison, RKSLF has a market cap of 524.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BMBLF is priced at $17.69, while RKSLF trades at $9.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMBLF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.05, whereas RKSLF's P/E ratio is 31.24. In terms of profitability, BMBLF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to RKSLF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BMBLF is more volatile compared to RKSLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMBLF.Check RKSLF's competition here
BMBLF vs ITEPF Comparison February 2026
BMBLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMBLF stands at 23.6B. In comparison, ITEPF has a market cap of 448.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BMBLF is priced at $17.69, while ITEPF trades at $1.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMBLF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.05, whereas ITEPF's P/E ratio is -13.68. In terms of profitability, BMBLF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ITEPF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BMBLF is more volatile compared to ITEPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMBLF.Check ITEPF's competition here
BMBLF vs CTAGF Comparison February 2026
BMBLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMBLF stands at 23.6B. In comparison, CTAGF has a market cap of 437.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BMBLF is priced at $17.69, while CTAGF trades at $3.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMBLF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.05, whereas CTAGF's P/E ratio is 64.17. In terms of profitability, BMBLF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CTAGF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BMBLF is more volatile compared to CTAGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMBLF.Check CTAGF's competition here
BMBLF vs DELRF Comparison February 2026
BMBLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMBLF stands at 23.6B. In comparison, DELRF has a market cap of 328M. Regarding current trading prices, BMBLF is priced at $17.69, while DELRF trades at $1.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMBLF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.05, whereas DELRF's P/E ratio is -15.18. In terms of profitability, BMBLF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to DELRF's ROE of -5.33%. Regarding short-term risk, BMBLF is more volatile compared to DELRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMBLF.Check DELRF's competition here
BMBLF vs KBRLF Comparison February 2026
BMBLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMBLF stands at 23.6B. In comparison, KBRLF has a market cap of 322.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BMBLF is priced at $17.69, while KBRLF trades at $25.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMBLF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.05, whereas KBRLF's P/E ratio is 20.07. In terms of profitability, BMBLF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to KBRLF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BMBLF is more volatile compared to KBRLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMBLF.Check KBRLF's competition here
BMBLF vs VSSPY Comparison February 2026
BMBLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMBLF stands at 23.6B. In comparison, VSSPY has a market cap of 302.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BMBLF is priced at $17.69, while VSSPY trades at $3.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMBLF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.05, whereas VSSPY's P/E ratio is 6.64. In terms of profitability, BMBLF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to VSSPY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BMBLF is more volatile compared to VSSPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMBLF.Check VSSPY's competition here
BMBLF vs ITEGY Comparison February 2026
BMBLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMBLF stands at 23.6B. In comparison, ITEGY has a market cap of 244.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BMBLF is priced at $17.69, while ITEGY trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMBLF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.05, whereas ITEGY's P/E ratio is -7.46. In terms of profitability, BMBLF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ITEGY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BMBLF is more volatile compared to ITEGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMBLF.Check ITEGY's competition here
BMBLF vs KPGHF Comparison February 2026
BMBLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMBLF stands at 23.6B. In comparison, KPGHF has a market cap of 221.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BMBLF is priced at $17.69, while KPGHF trades at $5.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMBLF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.05, whereas KPGHF's P/E ratio is 98.00. In terms of profitability, BMBLF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to KPGHF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BMBLF is less volatile compared to KPGHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMBLF.Check KPGHF's competition here
BMBLF vs PGWFF Comparison February 2026
BMBLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMBLF stands at 23.6B. In comparison, PGWFF has a market cap of 190.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BMBLF is priced at $17.69, while PGWFF trades at $2.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMBLF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.05, whereas PGWFF's P/E ratio is 126.00. In terms of profitability, BMBLF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to PGWFF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BMBLF is less volatile compared to PGWFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMBLF.Check PGWFF's competition here
BMBLF vs PCRRF Comparison February 2026
BMBLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMBLF stands at 23.6B. In comparison, PCRRF has a market cap of 164M. Regarding current trading prices, BMBLF is priced at $17.69, while PCRRF trades at $11.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMBLF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.05, whereas PCRRF's P/E ratio is 7.08. In terms of profitability, BMBLF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to PCRRF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BMBLF is more volatile compared to PCRRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMBLF.Check PCRRF's competition here
BMBLF vs CERGF Comparison February 2026
BMBLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMBLF stands at 23.6B. In comparison, CERGF has a market cap of 138.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BMBLF is priced at $17.69, while CERGF trades at $4.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMBLF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.05, whereas CERGF's P/E ratio is 63.71. In terms of profitability, BMBLF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CERGF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BMBLF is more volatile compared to CERGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMBLF.Check CERGF's competition here
BMBLF vs FLNCF Comparison February 2026
BMBLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMBLF stands at 23.6B. In comparison, FLNCF has a market cap of 132.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BMBLF is priced at $17.69, while FLNCF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMBLF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.05, whereas FLNCF's P/E ratio is -29.29. In terms of profitability, BMBLF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to FLNCF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BMBLF is more volatile compared to FLNCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMBLF.Check FLNCF's competition here
BMBLF vs AJISF Comparison February 2026
BMBLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMBLF stands at 23.6B. In comparison, AJISF has a market cap of 130.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BMBLF is priced at $17.69, while AJISF trades at $15.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMBLF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.05, whereas AJISF's P/E ratio is 8.86. In terms of profitability, BMBLF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to AJISF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BMBLF is more volatile compared to AJISF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMBLF.Check AJISF's competition here
BMBLF vs CTGL Comparison February 2026
BMBLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMBLF stands at 23.6B. In comparison, CTGL has a market cap of 125.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BMBLF is priced at $17.69, while CTGL trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMBLF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.05, whereas CTGL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BMBLF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CTGL's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, BMBLF is less volatile compared to CTGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMBLF.Check CTGL's competition here
BMBLF vs PCOA Comparison February 2026
BMBLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMBLF stands at 23.6B. In comparison, PCOA has a market cap of 113.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BMBLF is priced at $17.69, while PCOA trades at $150,000.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMBLF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.05, whereas PCOA's P/E ratio is 8.08. In terms of profitability, BMBLF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to PCOA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. BMBLF has daily volatility of 0.11 and PCOA has daily volatility of N/A.Check PCOA's competition here
BMBLF vs RDCPF Comparison February 2026
BMBLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMBLF stands at 23.6B. In comparison, RDCPF has a market cap of 63.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BMBLF is priced at $17.69, while RDCPF trades at $3.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMBLF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.05, whereas RDCPF's P/E ratio is 173.50. In terms of profitability, BMBLF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to RDCPF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BMBLF is less volatile compared to RDCPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMBLF.Check RDCPF's competition here
BMBLF vs WTLLF Comparison February 2026
BMBLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMBLF stands at 23.6B. In comparison, WTLLF has a market cap of 58.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BMBLF is priced at $17.69, while WTLLF trades at $3.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMBLF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.05, whereas WTLLF's P/E ratio is 13.92. In terms of profitability, BMBLF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to WTLLF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BMBLF is more volatile compared to WTLLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMBLF.Check WTLLF's competition here
BMBLF vs DCMDF Comparison February 2026
BMBLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMBLF stands at 23.6B. In comparison, DCMDF has a market cap of 58.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BMBLF is priced at $17.69, while DCMDF trades at $1.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMBLF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.05, whereas DCMDF's P/E ratio is 8.23. In terms of profitability, BMBLF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to DCMDF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, BMBLF is more volatile compared to DCMDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMBLF.Check DCMDF's competition here
BMBLF vs SRRPF Comparison February 2026
BMBLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMBLF stands at 23.6B. In comparison, SRRPF has a market cap of 54.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BMBLF is priced at $17.69, while SRRPF trades at $5.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMBLF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.05, whereas SRRPF's P/E ratio is 11.41. In terms of profitability, BMBLF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SRRPF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BMBLF is more volatile compared to SRRPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMBLF.Check SRRPF's competition here
BMBLF vs ASFH Comparison February 2026
BMBLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMBLF stands at 23.6B. In comparison, ASFH has a market cap of 46M. Regarding current trading prices, BMBLF is priced at $17.69, while ASFH trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMBLF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.05, whereas ASFH's P/E ratio is 56.10. In terms of profitability, BMBLF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ASFH's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BMBLF is less volatile compared to ASFH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMBLF.Check ASFH's competition here
BMBLF vs ESTTF Comparison February 2026
BMBLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMBLF stands at 23.6B. In comparison, ESTTF has a market cap of 44.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BMBLF is priced at $17.69, while ESTTF trades at $8.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMBLF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.05, whereas ESTTF's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, BMBLF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ESTTF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BMBLF is less volatile compared to ESTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMBLF.Check ESTTF's competition here
BMBLF vs UWHGF Comparison February 2026
BMBLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMBLF stands at 23.6B. In comparison, UWHGF has a market cap of 32.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BMBLF is priced at $17.69, while UWHGF trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMBLF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.05, whereas UWHGF's P/E ratio is -8.53. In terms of profitability, BMBLF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to UWHGF's ROE of -3.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BMBLF is more volatile compared to UWHGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMBLF.Check UWHGF's competition here
BMBLF vs CRKT Comparison February 2026
BMBLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMBLF stands at 23.6B. In comparison, CRKT has a market cap of 31.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BMBLF is priced at $17.69, while CRKT trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMBLF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.05, whereas CRKT's P/E ratio is -0.89. In terms of profitability, BMBLF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CRKT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BMBLF is more volatile compared to CRKT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMBLF.Check CRKT's competition here
BMBLF vs FTBGF Comparison February 2026
BMBLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMBLF stands at 23.6B. In comparison, FTBGF has a market cap of 29M. Regarding current trading prices, BMBLF is priced at $17.69, while FTBGF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMBLF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.05, whereas FTBGF's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, BMBLF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to FTBGF's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, BMBLF is more volatile compared to FTBGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMBLF.Check FTBGF's competition here
BMBLF vs SFRX Comparison February 2026
BMBLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMBLF stands at 23.6B. In comparison, SFRX has a market cap of 25.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BMBLF is priced at $17.69, while SFRX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMBLF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.05, whereas SFRX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BMBLF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SFRX's ROE of +0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, BMBLF is less volatile compared to SFRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMBLF.Check SFRX's competition here
BMBLF vs GNOLF Comparison February 2026
BMBLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMBLF stands at 23.6B. In comparison, GNOLF has a market cap of 19.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BMBLF is priced at $17.69, while GNOLF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMBLF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.05, whereas GNOLF's P/E ratio is -1.41. In terms of profitability, BMBLF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to GNOLF's ROE of +4.99%. Regarding short-term risk, BMBLF is more volatile compared to GNOLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMBLF.Check GNOLF's competition here
BMBLF vs RLFTY Comparison February 2026
BMBLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMBLF stands at 23.6B. In comparison, RLFTY has a market cap of 17.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BMBLF is priced at $17.69, while RLFTY trades at $1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMBLF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.05, whereas RLFTY's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, BMBLF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to RLFTY's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, BMBLF is more volatile compared to RLFTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMBLF.Check RLFTY's competition here
BMBLF vs NSYC Comparison February 2026
BMBLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMBLF stands at 23.6B. In comparison, NSYC has a market cap of 16.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BMBLF is priced at $17.69, while NSYC trades at $377.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMBLF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.05, whereas NSYC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BMBLF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to NSYC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BMBLF is more volatile compared to NSYC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMBLF.Check NSYC's competition here
BMBLF vs ELVG Comparison February 2026
BMBLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMBLF stands at 23.6B. In comparison, ELVG has a market cap of 10.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BMBLF is priced at $17.69, while ELVG trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMBLF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.05, whereas ELVG's P/E ratio is 0.83. In terms of profitability, BMBLF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ELVG's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BMBLF is more volatile compared to ELVG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMBLF.Check ELVG's competition here
BMBLF vs ADMQ Comparison February 2026
BMBLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMBLF stands at 23.6B. In comparison, ADMQ has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BMBLF is priced at $17.69, while ADMQ trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMBLF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.05, whereas ADMQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BMBLF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ADMQ's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BMBLF is less volatile compared to ADMQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMBLF.Check ADMQ's competition here
BMBLF vs REPO Comparison February 2026
BMBLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMBLF stands at 23.6B. In comparison, REPO has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BMBLF is priced at $17.69, while REPO trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMBLF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.05, whereas REPO's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, BMBLF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to REPO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BMBLF is less volatile compared to REPO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMBLF.Check REPO's competition here
BMBLF vs GPOX Comparison February 2026
BMBLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMBLF stands at 23.6B. In comparison, GPOX has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BMBLF is priced at $17.69, while GPOX trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMBLF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.05, whereas GPOX's P/E ratio is -1.10. In terms of profitability, BMBLF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to GPOX's ROE of +0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, BMBLF is less volatile compared to GPOX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMBLF.Check GPOX's competition here
BMBLF vs AWAW Comparison February 2026
BMBLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMBLF stands at 23.6B. In comparison, AWAW has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BMBLF is priced at $17.69, while AWAW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMBLF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.05, whereas AWAW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, BMBLF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to AWAW's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BMBLF is more volatile compared to AWAW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMBLF.Check AWAW's competition here
BMBLF vs LMTI Comparison February 2026
BMBLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMBLF stands at 23.6B. In comparison, LMTI has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BMBLF is priced at $17.69, while LMTI trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMBLF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.05, whereas LMTI's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, BMBLF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to LMTI's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BMBLF is less volatile compared to LMTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMBLF.Check LMTI's competition here
BMBLF vs CGRW Comparison February 2026
BMBLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMBLF stands at 23.6B. In comparison, CGRW has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BMBLF is priced at $17.69, while CGRW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMBLF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.05, whereas CGRW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, BMBLF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CGRW's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BMBLF is less volatile compared to CGRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMBLF.Check CGRW's competition here
BMBLF vs OODH Comparison February 2026
BMBLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMBLF stands at 23.6B. In comparison, OODH has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BMBLF is priced at $17.69, while OODH trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMBLF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.05, whereas OODH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BMBLF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to OODH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BMBLF is more volatile compared to OODH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMBLF.Check OODH's competition here
BMBLF vs ANMP Comparison February 2026
BMBLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMBLF stands at 23.6B. In comparison, ANMP has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BMBLF is priced at $17.69, while ANMP trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMBLF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.05, whereas ANMP's P/E ratio is 2.35. In terms of profitability, BMBLF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ANMP's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, BMBLF is more volatile compared to ANMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMBLF.Check ANMP's competition here
BMBLF vs SAYFF Comparison February 2026
BMBLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMBLF stands at 23.6B. In comparison, SAYFF has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BMBLF is priced at $17.69, while SAYFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMBLF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.05, whereas SAYFF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, BMBLF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SAYFF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BMBLF is more volatile compared to SAYFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMBLF.Check SAYFF's competition here
BMBLF vs UNDR Comparison February 2026
BMBLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMBLF stands at 23.6B. In comparison, UNDR has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BMBLF is priced at $17.69, while UNDR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMBLF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.05, whereas UNDR's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, BMBLF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to UNDR's ROE of +1.37%. Regarding short-term risk, BMBLF is more volatile compared to UNDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMBLF.Check UNDR's competition here
BMBLF vs HHGI Comparison February 2026
BMBLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMBLF stands at 23.6B. In comparison, HHGI has a market cap of 607.4K. Regarding current trading prices, BMBLF is priced at $17.69, while HHGI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMBLF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.05, whereas HHGI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BMBLF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to HHGI's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, BMBLF is more volatile compared to HHGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMBLF.Check HHGI's competition here
BMBLF vs JFIL Comparison February 2026
BMBLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMBLF stands at 23.6B. In comparison, JFIL has a market cap of 537.6K. Regarding current trading prices, BMBLF is priced at $17.69, while JFIL trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMBLF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.05, whereas JFIL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BMBLF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to JFIL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BMBLF is more volatile compared to JFIL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMBLF.Check JFIL's competition here
BMBLF vs ECOX Comparison February 2026
BMBLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMBLF stands at 23.6B. In comparison, ECOX has a market cap of 438.5K. Regarding current trading prices, BMBLF is priced at $17.69, while ECOX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMBLF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.05, whereas ECOX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BMBLF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ECOX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BMBLF is less volatile compared to ECOX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMBLF.Check ECOX's competition here
BMBLF vs MTPR Comparison February 2026
BMBLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMBLF stands at 23.6B. In comparison, MTPR has a market cap of 393.6K. Regarding current trading prices, BMBLF is priced at $17.69, while MTPR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMBLF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.05, whereas MTPR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BMBLF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to MTPR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BMBLF is more volatile compared to MTPR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMBLF.Check MTPR's competition here
BMBLF vs DTSL Comparison February 2026
BMBLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMBLF stands at 23.6B. In comparison, DTSL has a market cap of 391.3K. Regarding current trading prices, BMBLF is priced at $17.69, while DTSL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMBLF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.05, whereas DTSL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BMBLF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to DTSL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BMBLF is more volatile compared to DTSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMBLF.Check DTSL's competition here
BMBLF vs WLDPF Comparison February 2026
BMBLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMBLF stands at 23.6B. In comparison, WLDPF has a market cap of 360.7K. Regarding current trading prices, BMBLF is priced at $17.69, while WLDPF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMBLF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.05, whereas WLDPF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, BMBLF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to WLDPF's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, BMBLF is less volatile compared to WLDPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMBLF.Check WLDPF's competition here
BMBLF vs XCPL Comparison February 2026
BMBLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMBLF stands at 23.6B. In comparison, XCPL has a market cap of 337K. Regarding current trading prices, BMBLF is priced at $17.69, while XCPL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMBLF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.05, whereas XCPL's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, BMBLF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to XCPL's ROE of -1.47%. Regarding short-term risk, BMBLF is less volatile compared to XCPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMBLF.Check XCPL's competition here
BMBLF vs IJJP Comparison February 2026
BMBLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMBLF stands at 23.6B. In comparison, IJJP has a market cap of 221.4K. Regarding current trading prices, BMBLF is priced at $17.69, while IJJP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMBLF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.05, whereas IJJP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BMBLF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to IJJP's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BMBLF is more volatile compared to IJJP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMBLF.Check IJJP's competition here
BMBLF vs OPMG Comparison February 2026
BMBLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMBLF stands at 23.6B. In comparison, OPMG has a market cap of 219.2K. Regarding current trading prices, BMBLF is priced at $17.69, while OPMG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMBLF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.05, whereas OPMG's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, BMBLF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to OPMG's ROE of +15.86%. Regarding short-term risk, BMBLF is less volatile compared to OPMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMBLF.Check OPMG's competition here
BMBLF vs DPUI Comparison February 2026
BMBLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMBLF stands at 23.6B. In comparison, DPUI has a market cap of 199.7K. Regarding current trading prices, BMBLF is priced at $17.69, while DPUI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMBLF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.05, whereas DPUI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BMBLF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to DPUI's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, BMBLF is more volatile compared to DPUI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMBLF.Check DPUI's competition here
BMBLF vs IMJX Comparison February 2026
BMBLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMBLF stands at 23.6B. In comparison, IMJX has a market cap of 112.7K. Regarding current trading prices, BMBLF is priced at $17.69, while IMJX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMBLF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.05, whereas IMJX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BMBLF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to IMJX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BMBLF is more volatile compared to IMJX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMBLF.Check IMJX's competition here
BMBLF vs INCC Comparison February 2026
BMBLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMBLF stands at 23.6B. In comparison, INCC has a market cap of 109.4K. Regarding current trading prices, BMBLF is priced at $17.69, while INCC trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMBLF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.05, whereas INCC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BMBLF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to INCC's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BMBLF is less volatile compared to INCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMBLF.Check INCC's competition here
BMBLF vs PIFR Comparison February 2026
BMBLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMBLF stands at 23.6B. In comparison, PIFR has a market cap of 103.6K. Regarding current trading prices, BMBLF is priced at $17.69, while PIFR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMBLF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.05, whereas PIFR's P/E ratio is -1.80. In terms of profitability, BMBLF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to PIFR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BMBLF is more volatile compared to PIFR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMBLF.Check PIFR's competition here
BMBLF vs NNFC Comparison February 2026
BMBLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMBLF stands at 23.6B. In comparison, NNFC has a market cap of 97.8K. Regarding current trading prices, BMBLF is priced at $17.69, while NNFC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMBLF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.05, whereas NNFC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BMBLF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to NNFC's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, BMBLF is more volatile compared to NNFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMBLF.Check NNFC's competition here
BMBLF vs UCPC Comparison February 2026
BMBLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMBLF stands at 23.6B. In comparison, UCPC has a market cap of 56.2K. Regarding current trading prices, BMBLF is priced at $17.69, while UCPC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMBLF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.05, whereas UCPC's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, BMBLF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to UCPC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BMBLF is less volatile compared to UCPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMBLF.Check UCPC's competition here
BMBLF vs PPMT Comparison February 2026
BMBLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMBLF stands at 23.6B. In comparison, PPMT has a market cap of 54.3K. Regarding current trading prices, BMBLF is priced at $17.69, while PPMT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMBLF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.05, whereas PPMT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BMBLF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to PPMT's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BMBLF is less volatile compared to PPMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMBLF.Check PPMT's competition here
BMBLF vs GFGU Comparison February 2026
BMBLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMBLF stands at 23.6B. In comparison, GFGU has a market cap of 48.5K. Regarding current trading prices, BMBLF is priced at $17.69, while GFGU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMBLF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.05, whereas GFGU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BMBLF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to GFGU's ROE of +15.99%. Regarding short-term risk, BMBLF is more volatile compared to GFGU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMBLF.Check GFGU's competition here
BMBLF vs BFLD Comparison February 2026
BMBLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMBLF stands at 23.6B. In comparison, BFLD has a market cap of 43.8K. Regarding current trading prices, BMBLF is priced at $17.69, while BFLD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMBLF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.05, whereas BFLD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BMBLF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to BFLD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BMBLF is less volatile compared to BFLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMBLF.Check BFLD's competition here
BMBLF vs CBMJ Comparison February 2026
BMBLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMBLF stands at 23.6B. In comparison, CBMJ has a market cap of 41.9K. Regarding current trading prices, BMBLF is priced at $17.69, while CBMJ trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMBLF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.05, whereas CBMJ's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, BMBLF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CBMJ's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, BMBLF is less volatile compared to CBMJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMBLF.Check CBMJ's competition here
BMBLF vs SGLS Comparison February 2026
BMBLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMBLF stands at 23.6B. In comparison, SGLS has a market cap of 39.5K. Regarding current trading prices, BMBLF is priced at $17.69, while SGLS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMBLF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.05, whereas SGLS's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, BMBLF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SGLS's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, BMBLF is more volatile compared to SGLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMBLF.Check SGLS's competition here
BMBLF vs OPUS Comparison February 2026
BMBLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMBLF stands at 23.6B. In comparison, OPUS has a market cap of 33.9K. Regarding current trading prices, BMBLF is priced at $17.69, while OPUS trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMBLF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.05, whereas OPUS's P/E ratio is 0.18. In terms of profitability, BMBLF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to OPUS's ROE of +12.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BMBLF is more volatile compared to OPUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMBLF.Check OPUS's competition here
BMBLF vs AXCG Comparison February 2026
BMBLF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMBLF stands at 23.6B. In comparison, AXCG has a market cap of 31.5K. Regarding current trading prices, BMBLF is priced at $17.69, while AXCG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMBLF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.05, whereas AXCG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BMBLF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to AXCG's ROE of +1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, BMBLF is less volatile compared to AXCG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMBLF.Check AXCG's competition here