Belgravia Hartford Capital Inc.
Belgravia Hartford Capital Inc. BLGV.CN Peers
See (BLGV.CN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BLGV.CN | $0.05 | N/A | 4.4M | -1.67 | -$0.03 | N/A |
| BLK.NE | $25.95 | +2.37% | 206.8B | 23.38 | $1.11 | N/A |
| BN.TO | $79.09 | +0.91% | 130.3B | 197.73 | $0.40 | +0.80% |
| BAM.TO | $79.43 | +2.29% | 128.1B | 42.03 | $1.89 | +2.01% |
| VFV.TO | $143.58 | +1.53% | 20.9B | 25.15 | $5.71 | +1.07% |
| ZSP.TO | $88.56 | +1.57% | 17.2B | N/A | N/A | +0.96% |
| PHYS.TO | $35.19 | +0.03% | 16.4B | 3.69 | $9.54 | N/A |
| XIU.TO | $39.35 | +0.73% | 13.9B | 21.32 | $1.85 | +2.86% |
| XEF.TO | $42.58 | +1.50% | 11.5B | 16.73 | $2.55 | +2.45% |
| VUN.TO | $108.21 | +1.78% | 10.8B | 24.46 | $4.42 | +0.99% |
Stock Comparison
BLGV.CN vs BLK.NE Comparison
BLGV.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLGV.CN stands at 4.4M. In comparison, BLK.NE has a market cap of 206.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BLGV.CN is priced at $0.05, while BLK.NE trades at $25.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLGV.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas BLK.NE's P/E ratio is 23.38. In terms of profitability, BLGV.CN's ROE is +7.26%, compared to BLK.NE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BLGV.CN and BLK.NE have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BLGV.CN vs BN.TO Comparison
BLGV.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLGV.CN stands at 4.4M. In comparison, BN.TO has a market cap of 130.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BLGV.CN is priced at $0.05, while BN.TO trades at $79.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLGV.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas BN.TO's P/E ratio is 197.73. In terms of profitability, BLGV.CN's ROE is +7.26%, compared to BN.TO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BLGV.CN is less volatile compared to BN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLGV.CN.
BLGV.CN vs BAM.TO Comparison
BLGV.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLGV.CN stands at 4.4M. In comparison, BAM.TO has a market cap of 128.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BLGV.CN is priced at $0.05, while BAM.TO trades at $79.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLGV.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas BAM.TO's P/E ratio is 42.03. In terms of profitability, BLGV.CN's ROE is +7.26%, compared to BAM.TO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BLGV.CN is less volatile compared to BAM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLGV.CN.
BLGV.CN vs VFV.TO Comparison
BLGV.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLGV.CN stands at 4.4M. In comparison, VFV.TO has a market cap of 20.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BLGV.CN is priced at $0.05, while VFV.TO trades at $143.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLGV.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas VFV.TO's P/E ratio is 25.15. In terms of profitability, BLGV.CN's ROE is +7.26%, compared to VFV.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BLGV.CN is less volatile compared to VFV.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLGV.CN.
BLGV.CN vs ZSP.TO Comparison
BLGV.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLGV.CN stands at 4.4M. In comparison, ZSP.TO has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BLGV.CN is priced at $0.05, while ZSP.TO trades at $88.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLGV.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas ZSP.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BLGV.CN's ROE is +7.26%, compared to ZSP.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BLGV.CN is less volatile compared to ZSP.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLGV.CN.
BLGV.CN vs PHYS.TO Comparison
BLGV.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLGV.CN stands at 4.4M. In comparison, PHYS.TO has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BLGV.CN is priced at $0.05, while PHYS.TO trades at $35.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLGV.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas PHYS.TO's P/E ratio is 3.69. In terms of profitability, BLGV.CN's ROE is +7.26%, compared to PHYS.TO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BLGV.CN is less volatile compared to PHYS.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLGV.CN.
BLGV.CN vs XIU.TO Comparison
BLGV.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLGV.CN stands at 4.4M. In comparison, XIU.TO has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BLGV.CN is priced at $0.05, while XIU.TO trades at $39.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLGV.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas XIU.TO's P/E ratio is 21.32. In terms of profitability, BLGV.CN's ROE is +7.26%, compared to XIU.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BLGV.CN is less volatile compared to XIU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLGV.CN.
BLGV.CN vs XEF.TO Comparison
BLGV.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLGV.CN stands at 4.4M. In comparison, XEF.TO has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BLGV.CN is priced at $0.05, while XEF.TO trades at $42.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLGV.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas XEF.TO's P/E ratio is 16.73. In terms of profitability, BLGV.CN's ROE is +7.26%, compared to XEF.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BLGV.CN is less volatile compared to XEF.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLGV.CN.
BLGV.CN vs VUN.TO Comparison
BLGV.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLGV.CN stands at 4.4M. In comparison, VUN.TO has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BLGV.CN is priced at $0.05, while VUN.TO trades at $108.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLGV.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas VUN.TO's P/E ratio is 24.46. In terms of profitability, BLGV.CN's ROE is +7.26%, compared to VUN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BLGV.CN is less volatile compared to VUN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLGV.CN.
BLGV.CN vs IGM.TO Comparison
BLGV.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLGV.CN stands at 4.4M. In comparison, IGM.TO has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BLGV.CN is priced at $0.05, while IGM.TO trades at $44.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLGV.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas IGM.TO's P/E ratio is 11.22. In terms of profitability, BLGV.CN's ROE is +7.26%, compared to IGM.TO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BLGV.CN is less volatile compared to IGM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLGV.CN.
BLGV.CN vs ZCN.TO Comparison
BLGV.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLGV.CN stands at 4.4M. In comparison, ZCN.TO has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BLGV.CN is priced at $0.05, while ZCN.TO trades at $34.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLGV.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas ZCN.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BLGV.CN's ROE is +7.26%, compared to ZCN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BLGV.CN is less volatile compared to ZCN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLGV.CN.
BLGV.CN vs ZEA.TO Comparison
BLGV.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLGV.CN stands at 4.4M. In comparison, ZEA.TO has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BLGV.CN is priced at $0.05, while ZEA.TO trades at $25.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLGV.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas ZEA.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BLGV.CN's ROE is +7.26%, compared to ZEA.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BLGV.CN is less volatile compared to ZEA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLGV.CN.
BLGV.CN vs XIC.TO Comparison
BLGV.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLGV.CN stands at 4.4M. In comparison, XIC.TO has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, BLGV.CN is priced at $0.05, while XIC.TO trades at $41.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLGV.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas XIC.TO's P/E ratio is 20.56. In terms of profitability, BLGV.CN's ROE is +7.26%, compared to XIC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BLGV.CN is less volatile compared to XIC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLGV.CN.
BLGV.CN vs VCN.TO Comparison
BLGV.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLGV.CN stands at 4.4M. In comparison, VCN.TO has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BLGV.CN is priced at $0.05, while VCN.TO trades at $53.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLGV.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas VCN.TO's P/E ratio is 20.90. In terms of profitability, BLGV.CN's ROE is +7.26%, compared to VCN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BLGV.CN is less volatile compared to VCN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLGV.CN.
BLGV.CN vs XSP.TO Comparison
BLGV.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLGV.CN stands at 4.4M. In comparison, XSP.TO has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BLGV.CN is priced at $0.05, while XSP.TO trades at $60.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLGV.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas XSP.TO's P/E ratio is 25.53. In terms of profitability, BLGV.CN's ROE is +7.26%, compared to XSP.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BLGV.CN is less volatile compared to XSP.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLGV.CN.
BLGV.CN vs XUS.TO Comparison
BLGV.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLGV.CN stands at 4.4M. In comparison, XUS.TO has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BLGV.CN is priced at $0.05, while XUS.TO trades at $50.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLGV.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas XUS.TO's P/E ratio is 25.49. In terms of profitability, BLGV.CN's ROE is +7.26%, compared to XUS.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BLGV.CN is less volatile compared to XUS.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLGV.CN.
BLGV.CN vs PSLV.TO Comparison
BLGV.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLGV.CN stands at 4.4M. In comparison, PSLV.TO has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BLGV.CN is priced at $0.05, while PSLV.TO trades at $15.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLGV.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas PSLV.TO's P/E ratio is 3.73. In terms of profitability, BLGV.CN's ROE is +7.26%, compared to PSLV.TO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BLGV.CN is less volatile compared to PSLV.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLGV.CN.
BLGV.CN vs CEF.TO Comparison
BLGV.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLGV.CN stands at 4.4M. In comparison, CEF.TO has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BLGV.CN is priced at $0.05, while CEF.TO trades at $40.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLGV.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas CEF.TO's P/E ratio is 21.27. In terms of profitability, BLGV.CN's ROE is +7.26%, compared to CEF.TO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BLGV.CN is less volatile compared to CEF.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLGV.CN.
BLGV.CN vs XEQT.TO Comparison
BLGV.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLGV.CN stands at 4.4M. In comparison, XEQT.TO has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BLGV.CN is priced at $0.05, while XEQT.TO trades at $34.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLGV.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas XEQT.TO's P/E ratio is 20.48. In terms of profitability, BLGV.CN's ROE is +7.26%, compared to XEQT.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BLGV.CN is less volatile compared to XEQT.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLGV.CN.
BLGV.CN vs ONEX.TO Comparison
BLGV.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLGV.CN stands at 4.4M. In comparison, ONEX.TO has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, BLGV.CN is priced at $0.05, while ONEX.TO trades at $100.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLGV.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas ONEX.TO's P/E ratio is 11.66. In terms of profitability, BLGV.CN's ROE is +7.26%, compared to ONEX.TO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BLGV.CN is less volatile compared to ONEX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLGV.CN.
BLGV.CN vs VEQT.TO Comparison
BLGV.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLGV.CN stands at 4.4M. In comparison, VEQT.TO has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BLGV.CN is priced at $0.05, while VEQT.TO trades at $46.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLGV.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas VEQT.TO's P/E ratio is 20.53. In terms of profitability, BLGV.CN's ROE is +7.26%, compared to VEQT.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BLGV.CN is less volatile compared to VEQT.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLGV.CN.
BLGV.CN vs VGRO.TO Comparison
BLGV.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLGV.CN stands at 4.4M. In comparison, VGRO.TO has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BLGV.CN is priced at $0.05, while VGRO.TO trades at $38.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLGV.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas VGRO.TO's P/E ratio is 20.26. In terms of profitability, BLGV.CN's ROE is +7.26%, compared to VGRO.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BLGV.CN is less volatile compared to VGRO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLGV.CN.
BLGV.CN vs CASH.TO Comparison
BLGV.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLGV.CN stands at 4.4M. In comparison, CASH.TO has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BLGV.CN is priced at $0.05, while CASH.TO trades at $50.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLGV.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas CASH.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BLGV.CN's ROE is +7.26%, compared to CASH.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BLGV.CN is less volatile compared to CASH.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLGV.CN.
BLGV.CN vs CSAV.TO Comparison
BLGV.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLGV.CN stands at 4.4M. In comparison, CSAV.TO has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BLGV.CN is priced at $0.05, while CSAV.TO trades at $50.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLGV.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas CSAV.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BLGV.CN's ROE is +7.26%, compared to CSAV.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BLGV.CN is less volatile compared to CSAV.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLGV.CN.
BLGV.CN vs VIU.TO Comparison
BLGV.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLGV.CN stands at 4.4M. In comparison, VIU.TO has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BLGV.CN is priced at $0.05, while VIU.TO trades at $38.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLGV.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas VIU.TO's P/E ratio is 15.99. In terms of profitability, BLGV.CN's ROE is +7.26%, compared to VIU.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BLGV.CN is less volatile compared to VIU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLGV.CN.
BLGV.CN vs ZEB.TO Comparison
BLGV.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLGV.CN stands at 4.4M. In comparison, ZEB.TO has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BLGV.CN is priced at $0.05, while ZEB.TO trades at $43.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLGV.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas ZEB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BLGV.CN's ROE is +7.26%, compared to ZEB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BLGV.CN is less volatile compared to ZEB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLGV.CN.
BLGV.CN vs ZMMK.TO Comparison
BLGV.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLGV.CN stands at 4.4M. In comparison, ZMMK.TO has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BLGV.CN is priced at $0.05, while ZMMK.TO trades at $49.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLGV.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas ZMMK.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BLGV.CN's ROE is +7.26%, compared to ZMMK.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BLGV.CN is less volatile compared to ZMMK.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLGV.CN.
BLGV.CN vs PSA.TO Comparison
BLGV.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLGV.CN stands at 4.4M. In comparison, PSA.TO has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BLGV.CN is priced at $0.05, while PSA.TO trades at $50.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLGV.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas PSA.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BLGV.CN's ROE is +7.26%, compared to PSA.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BLGV.CN is less volatile compared to PSA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLGV.CN.
BLGV.CN vs ZLB.TO Comparison
BLGV.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLGV.CN stands at 4.4M. In comparison, ZLB.TO has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BLGV.CN is priced at $0.05, while ZLB.TO trades at $52.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLGV.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas ZLB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BLGV.CN's ROE is +7.26%, compared to ZLB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BLGV.CN is less volatile compared to ZLB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLGV.CN.
BLGV.CN vs CIX.TO Comparison
BLGV.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLGV.CN stands at 4.4M. In comparison, CIX.TO has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BLGV.CN is priced at $0.05, while CIX.TO trades at $31.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLGV.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas CIX.TO's P/E ratio is -16.97. In terms of profitability, BLGV.CN's ROE is +7.26%, compared to CIX.TO's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, BLGV.CN is less volatile compared to CIX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLGV.CN.
BLGV.CN vs VSP.TO Comparison
BLGV.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLGV.CN stands at 4.4M. In comparison, VSP.TO has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BLGV.CN is priced at $0.05, while VSP.TO trades at $94.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLGV.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas VSP.TO's P/E ratio is 25.24. In terms of profitability, BLGV.CN's ROE is +7.26%, compared to VSP.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BLGV.CN is less volatile compared to VSP.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLGV.CN.
BLGV.CN vs ZCS.TO Comparison
BLGV.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLGV.CN stands at 4.4M. In comparison, ZCS.TO has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BLGV.CN is priced at $0.05, while ZCS.TO trades at $13.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLGV.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas ZCS.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BLGV.CN's ROE is +7.26%, compared to ZCS.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BLGV.CN is less volatile compared to ZCS.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLGV.CN.
BLGV.CN vs HXS.TO Comparison
BLGV.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLGV.CN stands at 4.4M. In comparison, HXS.TO has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, BLGV.CN is priced at $0.05, while HXS.TO trades at $83.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLGV.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas HXS.TO's P/E ratio is 25.49. In terms of profitability, BLGV.CN's ROE is +7.26%, compared to HXS.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BLGV.CN is less volatile compared to HXS.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLGV.CN.
BLGV.CN vs HXT.TO Comparison
BLGV.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLGV.CN stands at 4.4M. In comparison, HXT.TO has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BLGV.CN is priced at $0.05, while HXT.TO trades at $68.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLGV.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas HXT.TO's P/E ratio is 21.43. In terms of profitability, BLGV.CN's ROE is +7.26%, compared to HXT.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BLGV.CN is less volatile compared to HXT.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLGV.CN.
BLGV.CN vs QUU.TO Comparison
BLGV.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLGV.CN stands at 4.4M. In comparison, QUU.TO has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BLGV.CN is priced at $0.05, while QUU.TO trades at $233.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLGV.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas QUU.TO's P/E ratio is 25.92. In terms of profitability, BLGV.CN's ROE is +7.26%, compared to QUU.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BLGV.CN is less volatile compared to QUU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLGV.CN.
BLGV.CN vs VDY.TO Comparison
BLGV.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLGV.CN stands at 4.4M. In comparison, VDY.TO has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BLGV.CN is priced at $0.05, while VDY.TO trades at $51.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLGV.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas VDY.TO's P/E ratio is 16.21. In terms of profitability, BLGV.CN's ROE is +7.26%, compared to VDY.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BLGV.CN is less volatile compared to VDY.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLGV.CN.
BLGV.CN vs XUU.TO Comparison
BLGV.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLGV.CN stands at 4.4M. In comparison, XUU.TO has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BLGV.CN is priced at $0.05, while XUU.TO trades at $59.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLGV.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas XUU.TO's P/E ratio is 24.71. In terms of profitability, BLGV.CN's ROE is +7.26%, compared to XUU.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BLGV.CN is less volatile compared to XUU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLGV.CN.
BLGV.CN vs VBAL.TO Comparison
BLGV.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLGV.CN stands at 4.4M. In comparison, VBAL.TO has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BLGV.CN is priced at $0.05, while VBAL.TO trades at $33.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLGV.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas VBAL.TO's P/E ratio is 20.03. In terms of profitability, BLGV.CN's ROE is +7.26%, compared to VBAL.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BLGV.CN is less volatile compared to VBAL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLGV.CN.
BLGV.CN vs ZUE.TO Comparison
BLGV.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLGV.CN stands at 4.4M. In comparison, ZUE.TO has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BLGV.CN is priced at $0.05, while ZUE.TO trades at $80.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLGV.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas ZUE.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BLGV.CN's ROE is +7.26%, compared to ZUE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BLGV.CN is less volatile compared to ZUE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLGV.CN.
BLGV.CN vs XQQ.TO Comparison
BLGV.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLGV.CN stands at 4.4M. In comparison, XQQ.TO has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BLGV.CN is priced at $0.05, while XQQ.TO trades at $53.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLGV.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas XQQ.TO's P/E ratio is 32.54. In terms of profitability, BLGV.CN's ROE is +7.26%, compared to XQQ.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BLGV.CN is less volatile compared to XQQ.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLGV.CN.
BLGV.CN vs XSEM.TO Comparison
BLGV.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLGV.CN stands at 4.4M. In comparison, XSEM.TO has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BLGV.CN is priced at $0.05, while XSEM.TO trades at $22.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLGV.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas XSEM.TO's P/E ratio is 14.47. In terms of profitability, BLGV.CN's ROE is +7.26%, compared to XSEM.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BLGV.CN is less volatile compared to XSEM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLGV.CN.
BLGV.CN vs TPU.TO Comparison
BLGV.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLGV.CN stands at 4.4M. In comparison, TPU.TO has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BLGV.CN is priced at $0.05, while TPU.TO trades at $45.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLGV.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas TPU.TO's P/E ratio is 25.82. In terms of profitability, BLGV.CN's ROE is +7.26%, compared to TPU.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BLGV.CN is less volatile compared to TPU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLGV.CN.
BLGV.CN vs XGRO.TO Comparison
BLGV.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLGV.CN stands at 4.4M. In comparison, XGRO.TO has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BLGV.CN is priced at $0.05, while XGRO.TO trades at $31.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLGV.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas XGRO.TO's P/E ratio is 20.22. In terms of profitability, BLGV.CN's ROE is +7.26%, compared to XGRO.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BLGV.CN is less volatile compared to XGRO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLGV.CN.
BLGV.CN vs TTP.TO Comparison
BLGV.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLGV.CN stands at 4.4M. In comparison, TTP.TO has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BLGV.CN is priced at $0.05, while TTP.TO trades at $29.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLGV.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas TTP.TO's P/E ratio is 20.40. In terms of profitability, BLGV.CN's ROE is +7.26%, compared to TTP.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BLGV.CN is less volatile compared to TTP.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLGV.CN.
BLGV.CN vs ZWB.TO Comparison
BLGV.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLGV.CN stands at 4.4M. In comparison, ZWB.TO has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BLGV.CN is priced at $0.05, while ZWB.TO trades at $20.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLGV.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas ZWB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BLGV.CN's ROE is +7.26%, compared to ZWB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BLGV.CN is less volatile compared to ZWB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLGV.CN.
BLGV.CN vs XAW.TO Comparison
BLGV.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLGV.CN stands at 4.4M. In comparison, XAW.TO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BLGV.CN is priced at $0.05, while XAW.TO trades at $44.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLGV.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas XAW.TO's P/E ratio is 20.76. In terms of profitability, BLGV.CN's ROE is +7.26%, compared to XAW.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BLGV.CN is less volatile compared to XAW.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLGV.CN.
BLGV.CN vs TPE.TO Comparison
BLGV.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLGV.CN stands at 4.4M. In comparison, TPE.TO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BLGV.CN is priced at $0.05, while TPE.TO trades at $24.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLGV.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas TPE.TO's P/E ratio is 16.72. In terms of profitability, BLGV.CN's ROE is +7.26%, compared to TPE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BLGV.CN is less volatile compared to TPE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLGV.CN.
BLGV.CN vs BBUC.TO Comparison
BLGV.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLGV.CN stands at 4.4M. In comparison, BBUC.TO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BLGV.CN is priced at $0.05, while BBUC.TO trades at $39.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLGV.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas BBUC.TO's P/E ratio is -2.63. In terms of profitability, BLGV.CN's ROE is +7.26%, compared to BBUC.TO's ROE of -2.92%. Regarding short-term risk, BLGV.CN is less volatile compared to BBUC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLGV.CN.
BLGV.CN vs XBB.TO Comparison
BLGV.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLGV.CN stands at 4.4M. In comparison, XBB.TO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BLGV.CN is priced at $0.05, while XBB.TO trades at $28.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLGV.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas XBB.TO's P/E ratio is 10.99. In terms of profitability, BLGV.CN's ROE is +7.26%, compared to XBB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BLGV.CN is less volatile compared to XBB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLGV.CN.
BLGV.CN vs VEE.TO Comparison
BLGV.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLGV.CN stands at 4.4M. In comparison, VEE.TO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BLGV.CN is priced at $0.05, while VEE.TO trades at $39.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLGV.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas VEE.TO's P/E ratio is 15.22. In terms of profitability, BLGV.CN's ROE is +7.26%, compared to VEE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BLGV.CN is less volatile compared to VEE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLGV.CN.
BLGV.CN vs VXC.TO Comparison
BLGV.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLGV.CN stands at 4.4M. In comparison, VXC.TO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BLGV.CN is priced at $0.05, while VXC.TO trades at $64.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLGV.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas VXC.TO's P/E ratio is 20.39. In terms of profitability, BLGV.CN's ROE is +7.26%, compared to VXC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BLGV.CN is less volatile compared to VXC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLGV.CN.
BLGV.CN vs NSCE.TO Comparison
BLGV.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLGV.CN stands at 4.4M. In comparison, NSCE.TO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BLGV.CN is priced at $0.05, while NSCE.TO trades at $48.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLGV.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas NSCE.TO's P/E ratio is 24.46. In terms of profitability, BLGV.CN's ROE is +7.26%, compared to NSCE.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BLGV.CN is less volatile compared to NSCE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLGV.CN.
BLGV.CN vs PFMN.TO Comparison
BLGV.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLGV.CN stands at 4.4M. In comparison, PFMN.TO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BLGV.CN is priced at $0.05, while PFMN.TO trades at $16.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLGV.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas PFMN.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BLGV.CN's ROE is +7.26%, compared to PFMN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BLGV.CN is less volatile compared to PFMN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLGV.CN.
BLGV.CN vs VCE.TO Comparison
BLGV.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLGV.CN stands at 4.4M. In comparison, VCE.TO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BLGV.CN is priced at $0.05, while VCE.TO trades at $57.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLGV.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas VCE.TO's P/E ratio is 20.84. In terms of profitability, BLGV.CN's ROE is +7.26%, compared to VCE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BLGV.CN is less volatile compared to VCE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLGV.CN.
BLGV.CN vs XEC.TO Comparison
BLGV.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLGV.CN stands at 4.4M. In comparison, XEC.TO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BLGV.CN is priced at $0.05, while XEC.TO trades at $31.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLGV.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas XEC.TO's P/E ratio is 14.95. In terms of profitability, BLGV.CN's ROE is +7.26%, compared to XEC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BLGV.CN is less volatile compared to XEC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLGV.CN.
BLGV.CN vs XDIV.TO Comparison
BLGV.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLGV.CN stands at 4.4M. In comparison, XDIV.TO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BLGV.CN is priced at $0.05, while XDIV.TO trades at $31.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLGV.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas XDIV.TO's P/E ratio is 16.18. In terms of profitability, BLGV.CN's ROE is +7.26%, compared to XDIV.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BLGV.CN is less volatile compared to XDIV.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLGV.CN.
BLGV.CN vs XCB.TO Comparison
BLGV.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLGV.CN stands at 4.4M. In comparison, XCB.TO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BLGV.CN is priced at $0.05, while XCB.TO trades at $20.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLGV.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas XCB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BLGV.CN's ROE is +7.26%, compared to XCB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BLGV.CN is less volatile compared to XCB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLGV.CN.
BLGV.CN vs ZLU.TO Comparison
BLGV.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLGV.CN stands at 4.4M. In comparison, ZLU.TO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BLGV.CN is priced at $0.05, while ZLU.TO trades at $54.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLGV.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas ZLU.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BLGV.CN's ROE is +7.26%, compared to ZLU.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BLGV.CN is less volatile compared to ZLU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLGV.CN.
BLGV.CN vs SII.TO Comparison
BLGV.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLGV.CN stands at 4.4M. In comparison, SII.TO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BLGV.CN is priced at $0.05, while SII.TO trades at $79.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLGV.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas SII.TO's P/E ratio is 29.74. In terms of profitability, BLGV.CN's ROE is +7.26%, compared to SII.TO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BLGV.CN is less volatile compared to SII.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLGV.CN.
BLGV.CN vs ZQQ.TO Comparison
BLGV.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLGV.CN stands at 4.4M. In comparison, ZQQ.TO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, BLGV.CN is priced at $0.05, while ZQQ.TO trades at $146.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLGV.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas ZQQ.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BLGV.CN's ROE is +7.26%, compared to ZQQ.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BLGV.CN is less volatile compared to ZQQ.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLGV.CN.
BLGV.CN vs CMR.TO Comparison
BLGV.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLGV.CN stands at 4.4M. In comparison, CMR.TO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, BLGV.CN is priced at $0.05, while CMR.TO trades at $50.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLGV.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas CMR.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BLGV.CN's ROE is +7.26%, compared to CMR.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BLGV.CN is less volatile compared to CMR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLGV.CN.
BLGV.CN vs VGG.TO Comparison
BLGV.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLGV.CN stands at 4.4M. In comparison, VGG.TO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, BLGV.CN is priced at $0.05, while VGG.TO trades at $92.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLGV.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas VGG.TO's P/E ratio is 23.79. In terms of profitability, BLGV.CN's ROE is +7.26%, compared to VGG.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BLGV.CN is less volatile compared to VGG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLGV.CN.
BLGV.CN vs XBAL.TO Comparison
BLGV.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLGV.CN stands at 4.4M. In comparison, XBAL.TO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BLGV.CN is priced at $0.05, while XBAL.TO trades at $30.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLGV.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas XBAL.TO's P/E ratio is 19.95. In terms of profitability, BLGV.CN's ROE is +7.26%, compared to XBAL.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BLGV.CN is less volatile compared to XBAL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLGV.CN.
BLGV.CN vs MNY.TO Comparison
BLGV.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLGV.CN stands at 4.4M. In comparison, MNY.TO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BLGV.CN is priced at $0.05, while MNY.TO trades at $100.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLGV.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas MNY.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BLGV.CN's ROE is +7.26%, compared to MNY.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BLGV.CN is less volatile compared to MNY.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLGV.CN.
BLGV.CN vs HSAV.TO Comparison
BLGV.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLGV.CN stands at 4.4M. In comparison, HSAV.TO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BLGV.CN is priced at $0.05, while HSAV.TO trades at $115.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLGV.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas HSAV.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BLGV.CN's ROE is +7.26%, compared to HSAV.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BLGV.CN is less volatile compared to HSAV.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLGV.CN.
BLGV.CN vs QCN.TO Comparison
BLGV.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLGV.CN stands at 4.4M. In comparison, QCN.TO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BLGV.CN is priced at $0.05, while QCN.TO trades at $159.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLGV.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas QCN.TO's P/E ratio is 20.42. In terms of profitability, BLGV.CN's ROE is +7.26%, compared to QCN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BLGV.CN is less volatile compared to QCN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLGV.CN.
BLGV.CN vs XIN.TO Comparison
BLGV.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLGV.CN stands at 4.4M. In comparison, XIN.TO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BLGV.CN is priced at $0.05, while XIN.TO trades at $39.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLGV.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas XIN.TO's P/E ratio is 17.00. In terms of profitability, BLGV.CN's ROE is +7.26%, compared to XIN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BLGV.CN is less volatile compared to XIN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLGV.CN.
BLGV.CN vs ZWU.TO Comparison
BLGV.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLGV.CN stands at 4.4M. In comparison, ZWU.TO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BLGV.CN is priced at $0.05, while ZWU.TO trades at $11.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLGV.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas ZWU.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BLGV.CN's ROE is +7.26%, compared to ZWU.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BLGV.CN is less volatile compared to ZWU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLGV.CN.
BLGV.CN vs XEI.TO Comparison
BLGV.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLGV.CN stands at 4.4M. In comparison, XEI.TO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BLGV.CN is priced at $0.05, while XEI.TO trades at $27.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLGV.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas XEI.TO's P/E ratio is 16.79. In terms of profitability, BLGV.CN's ROE is +7.26%, compared to XEI.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BLGV.CN is less volatile compared to XEI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLGV.CN.
BLGV.CN vs QQC.TO Comparison
BLGV.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLGV.CN stands at 4.4M. In comparison, QQC.TO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BLGV.CN is priced at $0.05, while QQC.TO trades at $34.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLGV.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas QQC.TO's P/E ratio is 32.39. In terms of profitability, BLGV.CN's ROE is +7.26%, compared to QQC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BLGV.CN is less volatile compared to QQC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLGV.CN.
BLGV.CN vs XDV.TO Comparison
BLGV.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLGV.CN stands at 4.4M. In comparison, XDV.TO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BLGV.CN is priced at $0.05, while XDV.TO trades at $33.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLGV.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas XDV.TO's P/E ratio is 14.03. In terms of profitability, BLGV.CN's ROE is +7.26%, compared to XDV.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BLGV.CN is less volatile compared to XDV.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLGV.CN.
BLGV.CN vs CACB.TO Comparison
BLGV.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLGV.CN stands at 4.4M. In comparison, CACB.TO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BLGV.CN is priced at $0.05, while CACB.TO trades at $20.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLGV.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas CACB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BLGV.CN's ROE is +7.26%, compared to CACB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BLGV.CN and CACB.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BLGV.CN vs CBIL.TO Comparison
BLGV.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLGV.CN stands at 4.4M. In comparison, CBIL.TO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BLGV.CN is priced at $0.05, while CBIL.TO trades at $50.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLGV.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas CBIL.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BLGV.CN's ROE is +7.26%, compared to CBIL.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BLGV.CN is less volatile compared to CBIL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLGV.CN.
BLGV.CN vs XFN.TO Comparison
BLGV.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLGV.CN stands at 4.4M. In comparison, XFN.TO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BLGV.CN is priced at $0.05, while XFN.TO trades at $62.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLGV.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas XFN.TO's P/E ratio is 16.19. In terms of profitability, BLGV.CN's ROE is +7.26%, compared to XFN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BLGV.CN is less volatile compared to XFN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLGV.CN.
BLGV.CN vs CYB.TO Comparison
BLGV.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLGV.CN stands at 4.4M. In comparison, CYB.TO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BLGV.CN is priced at $0.05, while CYB.TO trades at $77.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLGV.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas CYB.TO's P/E ratio is 10.52. In terms of profitability, BLGV.CN's ROE is +7.26%, compared to CYB.TO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BLGV.CN is less volatile compared to CYB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLGV.CN.
BLGV.CN vs ISIF.TO Comparison
BLGV.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLGV.CN stands at 4.4M. In comparison, ISIF.TO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BLGV.CN is priced at $0.05, while ISIF.TO trades at $12.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLGV.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas ISIF.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BLGV.CN's ROE is +7.26%, compared to ISIF.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BLGV.CN and ISIF.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BLGV.CN vs FIH-U.TO Comparison
BLGV.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLGV.CN stands at 4.4M. In comparison, FIH-U.TO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BLGV.CN is priced at $0.05, while FIH-U.TO trades at $17.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLGV.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas FIH-U.TO's P/E ratio is 58.60. In terms of profitability, BLGV.CN's ROE is +7.26%, compared to FIH-U.TO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BLGV.CN is less volatile compared to FIH-U.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLGV.CN.
BLGV.CN vs XFH.TO Comparison
BLGV.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLGV.CN stands at 4.4M. In comparison, XFH.TO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BLGV.CN is priced at $0.05, while XFH.TO trades at $34.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLGV.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas XFH.TO's P/E ratio is 16.69. In terms of profitability, BLGV.CN's ROE is +7.26%, compared to XFH.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BLGV.CN is less volatile compared to XFH.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLGV.CN.
BLGV.CN vs ZWC.TO Comparison
BLGV.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLGV.CN stands at 4.4M. In comparison, ZWC.TO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BLGV.CN is priced at $0.05, while ZWC.TO trades at $18.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLGV.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas ZWC.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BLGV.CN's ROE is +7.26%, compared to ZWC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BLGV.CN is less volatile compared to ZWC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLGV.CN.
BLGV.CN vs XGB.TO Comparison
BLGV.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLGV.CN stands at 4.4M. In comparison, XGB.TO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BLGV.CN is priced at $0.05, while XGB.TO trades at $19.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLGV.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas XGB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BLGV.CN's ROE is +7.26%, compared to XGB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BLGV.CN is less volatile compared to XGB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLGV.CN.
BLGV.CN vs XSH.TO Comparison
BLGV.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLGV.CN stands at 4.4M. In comparison, XSH.TO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BLGV.CN is priced at $0.05, while XSH.TO trades at $19.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLGV.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas XSH.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BLGV.CN's ROE is +7.26%, compared to XSH.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BLGV.CN is less volatile compared to XSH.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLGV.CN.
BLGV.CN vs UNC.TO Comparison
BLGV.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLGV.CN stands at 4.4M. In comparison, UNC.TO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BLGV.CN is priced at $0.05, while UNC.TO trades at $134.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLGV.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas UNC.TO's P/E ratio is 6.86. In terms of profitability, BLGV.CN's ROE is +7.26%, compared to UNC.TO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BLGV.CN is less volatile compared to UNC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLGV.CN.
BLGV.CN vs EQL.TO Comparison
BLGV.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLGV.CN stands at 4.4M. In comparison, EQL.TO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BLGV.CN is priced at $0.05, while EQL.TO trades at $36.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLGV.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas EQL.TO's P/E ratio is 21.17. In terms of profitability, BLGV.CN's ROE is +7.26%, compared to EQL.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BLGV.CN is less volatile compared to EQL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLGV.CN.
BLGV.CN vs ZPR.TO Comparison
BLGV.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLGV.CN stands at 4.4M. In comparison, ZPR.TO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BLGV.CN is priced at $0.05, while ZPR.TO trades at $11.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLGV.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas ZPR.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BLGV.CN's ROE is +7.26%, compared to ZPR.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BLGV.CN is less volatile compared to ZPR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLGV.CN.
BLGV.CN vs ZGB.TO Comparison
BLGV.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLGV.CN stands at 4.4M. In comparison, ZGB.TO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BLGV.CN is priced at $0.05, while ZGB.TO trades at $45.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLGV.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas ZGB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BLGV.CN's ROE is +7.26%, compared to ZGB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BLGV.CN is less volatile compared to ZGB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLGV.CN.
BLGV.CN vs ZEM.TO Comparison
BLGV.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLGV.CN stands at 4.4M. In comparison, ZEM.TO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BLGV.CN is priced at $0.05, while ZEM.TO trades at $22.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLGV.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas ZEM.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BLGV.CN's ROE is +7.26%, compared to ZEM.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BLGV.CN is less volatile compared to ZEM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLGV.CN.
BLGV.CN vs HMAX.TO Comparison
BLGV.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLGV.CN stands at 4.4M. In comparison, HMAX.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BLGV.CN is priced at $0.05, while HMAX.TO trades at $14.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLGV.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas HMAX.TO's P/E ratio is 16.50. In terms of profitability, BLGV.CN's ROE is +7.26%, compared to HMAX.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BLGV.CN is less volatile compared to HMAX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLGV.CN.
BLGV.CN vs HXCN.TO Comparison
BLGV.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLGV.CN stands at 4.4M. In comparison, HXCN.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BLGV.CN is priced at $0.05, while HXCN.TO trades at $43.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLGV.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas HXCN.TO's P/E ratio is 20.53. In terms of profitability, BLGV.CN's ROE is +7.26%, compared to HXCN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BLGV.CN is less volatile compared to HXCN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLGV.CN.
BLGV.CN vs VSB.TO Comparison
BLGV.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLGV.CN stands at 4.4M. In comparison, VSB.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BLGV.CN is priced at $0.05, while VSB.TO trades at $23.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLGV.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas VSB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BLGV.CN's ROE is +7.26%, compared to VSB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BLGV.CN is less volatile compared to VSB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLGV.CN.
BLGV.CN vs RIIN.TO Comparison
BLGV.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLGV.CN stands at 4.4M. In comparison, RIIN.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BLGV.CN is priced at $0.05, while RIIN.TO trades at $22.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLGV.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas RIIN.TO's P/E ratio is 20.49. In terms of profitability, BLGV.CN's ROE is +7.26%, compared to RIIN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BLGV.CN is less volatile compared to RIIN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLGV.CN.
BLGV.CN vs ZUQ.TO Comparison
BLGV.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLGV.CN stands at 4.4M. In comparison, ZUQ.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BLGV.CN is priced at $0.05, while ZUQ.TO trades at $84.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLGV.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas ZUQ.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BLGV.CN's ROE is +7.26%, compared to ZUQ.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BLGV.CN is less volatile compared to ZUQ.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLGV.CN.
BLGV.CN vs XEG.TO Comparison
BLGV.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLGV.CN stands at 4.4M. In comparison, XEG.TO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BLGV.CN is priced at $0.05, while XEG.TO trades at $16.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLGV.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas XEG.TO's P/E ratio is 12.78. In terms of profitability, BLGV.CN's ROE is +7.26%, compared to XEG.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BLGV.CN is less volatile compared to XEG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLGV.CN.
BLGV.CN vs HHL.TO Comparison
BLGV.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLGV.CN stands at 4.4M. In comparison, HHL.TO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BLGV.CN is priced at $0.05, while HHL.TO trades at $7.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLGV.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas HHL.TO's P/E ratio is 23.47. In terms of profitability, BLGV.CN's ROE is +7.26%, compared to HHL.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BLGV.CN is less volatile compared to HHL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLGV.CN.
BLGV.CN vs MUB.TO Comparison
BLGV.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLGV.CN stands at 4.4M. In comparison, MUB.TO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BLGV.CN is priced at $0.05, while MUB.TO trades at $18.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLGV.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas MUB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BLGV.CN's ROE is +7.26%, compared to MUB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BLGV.CN is less volatile compared to MUB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLGV.CN.
BLGV.CN vs FCUV.TO Comparison
BLGV.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLGV.CN stands at 4.4M. In comparison, FCUV.TO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BLGV.CN is priced at $0.05, while FCUV.TO trades at $19.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLGV.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas FCUV.TO's P/E ratio is 16.13. In terms of profitability, BLGV.CN's ROE is +7.26%, compared to FCUV.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BLGV.CN is less volatile compared to FCUV.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLGV.CN.
BLGV.CN vs XWD.TO Comparison
BLGV.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLGV.CN stands at 4.4M. In comparison, XWD.TO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BLGV.CN is priced at $0.05, while XWD.TO trades at $95.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLGV.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas XWD.TO's P/E ratio is 22.44. In terms of profitability, BLGV.CN's ROE is +7.26%, compared to XWD.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BLGV.CN is less volatile compared to XWD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLGV.CN.
BLGV.CN vs ZDV.TO Comparison
BLGV.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLGV.CN stands at 4.4M. In comparison, ZDV.TO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BLGV.CN is priced at $0.05, while ZDV.TO trades at $23.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLGV.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas ZDV.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BLGV.CN's ROE is +7.26%, compared to ZDV.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BLGV.CN is less volatile compared to ZDV.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLGV.CN.
BLGV.CN vs BND.TO Comparison
BLGV.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLGV.CN stands at 4.4M. In comparison, BND.TO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BLGV.CN is priced at $0.05, while BND.TO trades at $17.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLGV.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas BND.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BLGV.CN's ROE is +7.26%, compared to BND.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BLGV.CN is less volatile compared to BND.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLGV.CN.
BLGV.CN vs QDX.TO Comparison
BLGV.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BLGV.CN stands at 4.4M. In comparison, QDX.TO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BLGV.CN is priced at $0.05, while QDX.TO trades at $133.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BLGV.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas QDX.TO's P/E ratio is 16.71. In terms of profitability, BLGV.CN's ROE is +7.26%, compared to QDX.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BLGV.CN is less volatile compared to QDX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BLGV.CN.