BioNitrogen Holdings Corp.
BioNitrogen Holdings Corp. BIONQ Peers
See (BIONQ) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Agricultural Inputs Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BIONQ | $0.00 | +900.00% | 448 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| CBLUY | $10.68 | -4.56% | 53.5B | 5.90 | $1.81 | +7.87% |
| YARIY | $18.12 | -0.81% | 18.5B | 31.79 | $0.57 | +1.33% |
| PHOJY | $22.09 | N/A | 17.5B | 3.99 | $5.53 | N/A |
| YRAIF | $32.95 | N/A | 8.4B | 29.16 | $1.13 | +1.49% |
| BLONF | $0.01 | +150.00% | 7.1B | -0.50 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| KPLUF | $18.62 | N/A | 3.3B | 1862.00 | $0.01 | +1.03% |
| TSDOF | $25.18 | N/A | 1.5B | 31.48 | $0.80 | +3.87% |
| CBLUF | $0.26 | N/A | 1.2B | 8.67 | $0.03 | +6.42% |
| SNFRY | $7.73 | N/A | 1.1B | 7.43 | $1.04 | +4.06% |
Stock Comparison
BIONQ vs CBLUY Comparison
BIONQ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIONQ stands at 448. In comparison, CBLUY has a market cap of 53.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BIONQ is priced at $0.00, while CBLUY trades at $10.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIONQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CBLUY's P/E ratio is 5.90. In terms of profitability, BIONQ's ROE is +1.89%, compared to CBLUY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BIONQ is less volatile compared to CBLUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIONQ.
BIONQ vs YARIY Comparison
BIONQ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIONQ stands at 448. In comparison, YARIY has a market cap of 18.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BIONQ is priced at $0.00, while YARIY trades at $18.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIONQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YARIY's P/E ratio is 31.79. In terms of profitability, BIONQ's ROE is +1.89%, compared to YARIY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BIONQ is less volatile compared to YARIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIONQ.
BIONQ vs PHOJY Comparison
BIONQ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIONQ stands at 448. In comparison, PHOJY has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BIONQ is priced at $0.00, while PHOJY trades at $22.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIONQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PHOJY's P/E ratio is 3.99. In terms of profitability, BIONQ's ROE is +1.89%, compared to PHOJY's ROE of +1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BIONQ and PHOJY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BIONQ vs YRAIF Comparison
BIONQ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIONQ stands at 448. In comparison, YRAIF has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BIONQ is priced at $0.00, while YRAIF trades at $32.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIONQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YRAIF's P/E ratio is 29.16. In terms of profitability, BIONQ's ROE is +1.89%, compared to YRAIF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BIONQ is less volatile compared to YRAIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIONQ.
BIONQ vs BLONF Comparison
BIONQ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIONQ stands at 448. In comparison, BLONF has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BIONQ is priced at $0.00, while BLONF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIONQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BLONF's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, BIONQ's ROE is +1.89%, compared to BLONF's ROE of -2.60%. Regarding short-term risk, BIONQ and BLONF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BIONQ vs KPLUF Comparison
BIONQ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIONQ stands at 448. In comparison, KPLUF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BIONQ is priced at $0.00, while KPLUF trades at $18.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIONQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KPLUF's P/E ratio is 1862.00. In terms of profitability, BIONQ's ROE is +1.89%, compared to KPLUF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BIONQ and KPLUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BIONQ vs TSDOF Comparison
BIONQ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIONQ stands at 448. In comparison, TSDOF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BIONQ is priced at $0.00, while TSDOF trades at $25.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIONQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TSDOF's P/E ratio is 31.48. In terms of profitability, BIONQ's ROE is +1.89%, compared to TSDOF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BIONQ is less volatile compared to TSDOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIONQ.
BIONQ vs CBLUF Comparison
BIONQ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIONQ stands at 448. In comparison, CBLUF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BIONQ is priced at $0.00, while CBLUF trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIONQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CBLUF's P/E ratio is 8.67. In terms of profitability, BIONQ's ROE is +1.89%, compared to CBLUF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BIONQ is less volatile compared to CBLUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIONQ.
BIONQ vs SNFRY Comparison
BIONQ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIONQ stands at 448. In comparison, SNFRY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BIONQ is priced at $0.00, while SNFRY trades at $7.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIONQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNFRY's P/E ratio is 7.43. In terms of profitability, BIONQ's ROE is +1.89%, compared to SNFRY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BIONQ is less volatile compared to SNFRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIONQ.
BIONQ vs SNFRF Comparison
BIONQ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIONQ stands at 448. In comparison, SNFRF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BIONQ is priced at $0.00, while SNFRF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIONQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNFRF's P/E ratio is 7.70. In terms of profitability, BIONQ's ROE is +1.89%, compared to SNFRF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BIONQ is less volatile compared to SNFRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIONQ.
BIONQ vs NUFMF Comparison
BIONQ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIONQ stands at 448. In comparison, NUFMF has a market cap of 570.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BIONQ is priced at $0.00, while NUFMF trades at $1.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIONQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NUFMF's P/E ratio is -37.25. In terms of profitability, BIONQ's ROE is +1.89%, compared to NUFMF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BIONQ is less volatile compared to NUFMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIONQ.
BIONQ vs BWEL Comparison
BIONQ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIONQ stands at 448. In comparison, BWEL has a market cap of 566.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BIONQ is priced at $0.00, while BWEL trades at $565.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIONQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BWEL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BIONQ's ROE is +1.89%, compared to BWEL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BIONQ is less volatile compared to BWEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIONQ.
BIONQ vs MBCF Comparison
BIONQ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIONQ stands at 448. In comparison, MBCF has a market cap of 348.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BIONQ is priced at $0.00, while MBCF trades at $1.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIONQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MBCF's P/E ratio is 3.55. In terms of profitability, BIONQ's ROE is +1.89%, compared to MBCF's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, BIONQ is less volatile compared to MBCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIONQ.
BIONQ vs ALGWF Comparison
BIONQ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIONQ stands at 448. In comparison, ALGWF has a market cap of 120.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BIONQ is priced at $0.00, while ALGWF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIONQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALGWF's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, BIONQ's ROE is +1.89%, compared to ALGWF's ROE of -3.45%. Regarding short-term risk, BIONQ is less volatile compared to ALGWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIONQ.
BIONQ vs DNKLY Comparison
BIONQ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIONQ stands at 448. In comparison, DNKLY has a market cap of 102.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BIONQ is priced at $0.00, while DNKLY trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIONQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DNKLY's P/E ratio is -24.29. In terms of profitability, BIONQ's ROE is +1.89%, compared to DNKLY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BIONQ is less volatile compared to DNKLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIONQ.
BIONQ vs EMSNF Comparison
BIONQ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIONQ stands at 448. In comparison, EMSNF has a market cap of 58.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BIONQ is priced at $0.00, while EMSNF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIONQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EMSNF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BIONQ's ROE is +1.89%, compared to EMSNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BIONQ and EMSNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BIONQ vs PLHCF Comparison
BIONQ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIONQ stands at 448. In comparison, PLHCF has a market cap of 54.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BIONQ is priced at $0.00, while PLHCF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIONQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLHCF's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, BIONQ's ROE is +1.89%, compared to PLHCF's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, BIONQ and PLHCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BIONQ vs MGROF Comparison
BIONQ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIONQ stands at 448. In comparison, MGROF has a market cap of 34.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BIONQ is priced at $0.00, while MGROF trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIONQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MGROF's P/E ratio is -9.57. In terms of profitability, BIONQ's ROE is +1.89%, compared to MGROF's ROE of -1.40%. Regarding short-term risk, BIONQ and MGROF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BIONQ vs KNGW Comparison
BIONQ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIONQ stands at 448. In comparison, KNGW has a market cap of 32.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BIONQ is priced at $0.00, while KNGW trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIONQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KNGW's P/E ratio is -2.91. In terms of profitability, BIONQ's ROE is +1.89%, compared to KNGW's ROE of -8.27%. Regarding short-term risk, BIONQ and KNGW have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BIONQ vs EDNSF Comparison
BIONQ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIONQ stands at 448. In comparison, EDNSF has a market cap of 26.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BIONQ is priced at $0.00, while EDNSF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIONQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EDNSF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, BIONQ's ROE is +1.89%, compared to EDNSF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BIONQ and EDNSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BIONQ vs VNPKF Comparison
BIONQ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIONQ stands at 448. In comparison, VNPKF has a market cap of 20M. Regarding current trading prices, BIONQ is priced at $0.00, while VNPKF trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIONQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VNPKF's P/E ratio is -2.37. In terms of profitability, BIONQ's ROE is +1.89%, compared to VNPKF's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, BIONQ is less volatile compared to VNPKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIONQ.
BIONQ vs HMIFF Comparison
BIONQ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIONQ stands at 448. In comparison, HMIFF has a market cap of 16.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BIONQ is priced at $0.00, while HMIFF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIONQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HMIFF's P/E ratio is -5.79. In terms of profitability, BIONQ's ROE is +1.89%, compared to HMIFF's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, BIONQ and HMIFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BIONQ vs ARLSF Comparison
BIONQ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIONQ stands at 448. In comparison, ARLSF has a market cap of 10.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BIONQ is priced at $0.00, while ARLSF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIONQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARLSF's P/E ratio is -11.16. In terms of profitability, BIONQ's ROE is +1.89%, compared to ARLSF's ROE of -4.42%. Regarding short-term risk, BIONQ is less volatile compared to ARLSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIONQ.
BIONQ vs VVIVF Comparison
BIONQ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIONQ stands at 448. In comparison, VVIVF has a market cap of 8.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BIONQ is priced at $0.00, while VVIVF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIONQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VVIVF's P/E ratio is -2.93. In terms of profitability, BIONQ's ROE is +1.89%, compared to VVIVF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BIONQ and VVIVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BIONQ vs FTZZF Comparison
BIONQ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIONQ stands at 448. In comparison, FTZZF has a market cap of 8M. Regarding current trading prices, BIONQ is priced at $0.00, while FTZZF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIONQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FTZZF's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, BIONQ's ROE is +1.89%, compared to FTZZF's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, BIONQ is less volatile compared to FTZZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIONQ.
BIONQ vs LBTD Comparison
BIONQ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIONQ stands at 448. In comparison, LBTD has a market cap of 7.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BIONQ is priced at $0.00, while LBTD trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIONQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LBTD's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, BIONQ's ROE is +1.89%, compared to LBTD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BIONQ is less volatile compared to LBTD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIONQ.
BIONQ vs KRLTF Comparison
BIONQ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIONQ stands at 448. In comparison, KRLTF has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BIONQ is priced at $0.00, while KRLTF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIONQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KRLTF's P/E ratio is -5.24. In terms of profitability, BIONQ's ROE is +1.89%, compared to KRLTF's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, BIONQ is less volatile compared to KRLTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIONQ.
BIONQ vs APEOF Comparison
BIONQ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIONQ stands at 448. In comparison, APEOF has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BIONQ is priced at $0.00, while APEOF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIONQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas APEOF's P/E ratio is -0.58. In terms of profitability, BIONQ's ROE is +1.89%, compared to APEOF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BIONQ and APEOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BIONQ vs BEVVF Comparison
BIONQ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIONQ stands at 448. In comparison, BEVVF has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, BIONQ is priced at $0.00, while BEVVF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIONQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BEVVF's P/E ratio is -0.49. In terms of profitability, BIONQ's ROE is +1.89%, compared to BEVVF's ROE of -4.84%. Regarding short-term risk, BIONQ and BEVVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BIONQ vs MAAFF Comparison
BIONQ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIONQ stands at 448. In comparison, MAAFF has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BIONQ is priced at $0.00, while MAAFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIONQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MAAFF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BIONQ's ROE is +1.89%, compared to MAAFF's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, BIONQ is less volatile compared to MAAFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIONQ.
BIONQ vs HFGVF Comparison
BIONQ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIONQ stands at 448. In comparison, HFGVF has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BIONQ is priced at $0.00, while HFGVF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIONQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HFGVF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BIONQ's ROE is +1.89%, compared to HFGVF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, BIONQ is less volatile compared to HFGVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIONQ.
BIONQ vs EACTF Comparison
BIONQ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIONQ stands at 448. In comparison, EACTF has a market cap of 578.4K. Regarding current trading prices, BIONQ is priced at $0.00, while EACTF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIONQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EACTF's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, BIONQ's ROE is +1.89%, compared to EACTF's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, BIONQ and EACTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BIONQ vs PTAM Comparison
BIONQ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIONQ stands at 448. In comparison, PTAM has a market cap of 319.5K. Regarding current trading prices, BIONQ is priced at $0.00, while PTAM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIONQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTAM's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, BIONQ's ROE is +1.89%, compared to PTAM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BIONQ and PTAM have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BIONQ vs IGNE Comparison
BIONQ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIONQ stands at 448. In comparison, IGNE has a market cap of 156.5K. Regarding current trading prices, BIONQ is priced at $0.00, while IGNE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIONQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IGNE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BIONQ's ROE is +1.89%, compared to IGNE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BIONQ is less volatile compared to IGNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIONQ.
BIONQ vs GREN Comparison
BIONQ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIONQ stands at 448. In comparison, GREN has a market cap of 115.3K. Regarding current trading prices, BIONQ is priced at $0.00, while GREN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIONQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GREN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BIONQ's ROE is +1.89%, compared to GREN's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, BIONQ is less volatile compared to GREN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIONQ.
BIONQ vs KWBT Comparison
BIONQ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIONQ stands at 448. In comparison, KWBT has a market cap of 56.5K. Regarding current trading prices, BIONQ is priced at $0.00, while KWBT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIONQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KWBT's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, BIONQ's ROE is +1.89%, compared to KWBT's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, BIONQ and KWBT have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BIONQ vs AGYP Comparison
BIONQ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIONQ stands at 448. In comparison, AGYP has a market cap of 14.7K. Regarding current trading prices, BIONQ is priced at $0.00, while AGYP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIONQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AGYP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BIONQ's ROE is +1.89%, compared to AGYP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BIONQ is less volatile compared to AGYP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIONQ.
BIONQ vs KGET Comparison
BIONQ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIONQ stands at 448. In comparison, KGET has a market cap of 11.9K. Regarding current trading prices, BIONQ is priced at $0.00, while KGET trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIONQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KGET's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, BIONQ's ROE is +1.89%, compared to KGET's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BIONQ and KGET have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BIONQ vs SLCO Comparison
BIONQ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIONQ stands at 448. In comparison, SLCO has a market cap of 4.7K. Regarding current trading prices, BIONQ is priced at $0.00, while SLCO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIONQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SLCO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BIONQ's ROE is +1.89%, compared to SLCO's ROE of -5.46%. Regarding short-term risk, BIONQ and SLCO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BIONQ vs HUMT Comparison
BIONQ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIONQ stands at 448. In comparison, HUMT has a market cap of 3.7K. Regarding current trading prices, BIONQ is priced at $0.00, while HUMT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIONQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HUMT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BIONQ's ROE is +1.89%, compared to HUMT's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, BIONQ and HUMT have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BIONQ vs YUII Comparison
BIONQ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIONQ stands at 448. In comparison, YUII has a market cap of 2K. Regarding current trading prices, BIONQ is priced at $0.00, while YUII trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIONQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YUII's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BIONQ's ROE is +1.89%, compared to YUII's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, BIONQ and YUII have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BIONQ vs ITRO Comparison
BIONQ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIONQ stands at 448. In comparison, ITRO has a market cap of 1.8K. Regarding current trading prices, BIONQ is priced at $0.00, while ITRO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIONQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ITRO's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, BIONQ's ROE is +1.89%, compared to ITRO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BIONQ and ITRO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BIONQ vs NOEC Comparison
BIONQ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIONQ stands at 448. In comparison, NOEC has a market cap of 1.7K. Regarding current trading prices, BIONQ is priced at $0.00, while NOEC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIONQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NOEC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, BIONQ's ROE is +1.89%, compared to NOEC's ROE of -1.68%. Regarding short-term risk, BIONQ is less volatile compared to NOEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BIONQ.
BIONQ vs PHOS Comparison
BIONQ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIONQ stands at 448. In comparison, PHOS has a market cap of 841. Regarding current trading prices, BIONQ is priced at $0.00, while PHOS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIONQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PHOS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BIONQ's ROE is +1.89%, compared to PHOS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BIONQ and PHOS have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BIONQ vs USBC Comparison
BIONQ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIONQ stands at 448. In comparison, USBC has a market cap of 41. Regarding current trading prices, BIONQ is priced at $0.00, while USBC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIONQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas USBC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BIONQ's ROE is +1.89%, compared to USBC's ROE of -2.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BIONQ and USBC have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BIONQ vs QCCP Comparison
BIONQ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BIONQ stands at 448. In comparison, QCCP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BIONQ is priced at $0.00, while QCCP trades at $1,750.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BIONQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QCCP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BIONQ's ROE is +1.89%, compared to QCCP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BIONQ and QCCP have similar daily volatility (0.00).