Bil Energy Systems Ltd.
Bil Energy Systems Ltd. (BILENERGY.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (BILENERGY.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Manufacturing - Metal Fabrication Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BILENERGY.NS | ₹0.60 | +0.00% | 139.5M | -0.20 | -₹2.95 | N/A |
| PTCIL.BO | ₹17,643.10 | +0.00% | 267.9B | 405.07 | ₹44.11 | N/A |
| PTCIL.NS | ₹17,675.00 | +0.00% | 267B | 402.99 | ₹44.19 | N/A |
| SANSERA.NS | ₹2,252.60 | +0.00% | 142.2B | 54.04 | ₹42.29 | +0.14% |
| SANSERA.BO | ₹2,250.50 | +0.00% | 141.9B | 53.92 | ₹42.29 | +0.14% |
| HAPPYFORGE.NS | ₹1,290.90 | +0.00% | 127.1B | 44.47 | ₹30.30 | +0.22% |
| GRAVITA.BO | ₹1,631.35 | +0.00% | 115.7B | 30.13 | ₹52.74 | +0.73% |
| GRAVITA.NS | ₹1,632.30 | +0.00% | 115.5B | 30.13 | ₹52.63 | +0.73% |
| RHIM.BO | ₹464.65 | +0.00% | 94.7B | 55.25 | ₹8.30 | +0.55% |
| RHIM.NS | ₹464.50 | +0.00% | 94.7B | 55.11 | ₹8.32 | +0.55% |
Stock Comparison
BILENERGY.NS vs PTCIL.BO Comparison February 2026
BILENERGY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BILENERGY.NS stands at 139.5M. In comparison, PTCIL.BO has a market cap of 267.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BILENERGY.NS is priced at ₹0.60, while PTCIL.BO trades at ₹17,643.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BILENERGY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas PTCIL.BO's P/E ratio is 405.07. In terms of profitability, BILENERGY.NS's ROE is +2.63%, compared to PTCIL.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BILENERGY.NS is more volatile compared to PTCIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BILENERGY.NS.Check PTCIL.BO's competition here
BILENERGY.NS vs PTCIL.NS Comparison February 2026
BILENERGY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BILENERGY.NS stands at 139.5M. In comparison, PTCIL.NS has a market cap of 267B. Regarding current trading prices, BILENERGY.NS is priced at ₹0.60, while PTCIL.NS trades at ₹17,675.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BILENERGY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas PTCIL.NS's P/E ratio is 402.99. In terms of profitability, BILENERGY.NS's ROE is +2.63%, compared to PTCIL.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BILENERGY.NS is more volatile compared to PTCIL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BILENERGY.NS.Check PTCIL.NS's competition here
BILENERGY.NS vs SANSERA.NS Comparison February 2026
BILENERGY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BILENERGY.NS stands at 139.5M. In comparison, SANSERA.NS has a market cap of 142.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BILENERGY.NS is priced at ₹0.60, while SANSERA.NS trades at ₹2,252.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BILENERGY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas SANSERA.NS's P/E ratio is 54.04. In terms of profitability, BILENERGY.NS's ROE is +2.63%, compared to SANSERA.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BILENERGY.NS is more volatile compared to SANSERA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BILENERGY.NS.Check SANSERA.NS's competition here
BILENERGY.NS vs SANSERA.BO Comparison February 2026
BILENERGY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BILENERGY.NS stands at 139.5M. In comparison, SANSERA.BO has a market cap of 141.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BILENERGY.NS is priced at ₹0.60, while SANSERA.BO trades at ₹2,250.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BILENERGY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas SANSERA.BO's P/E ratio is 53.92. In terms of profitability, BILENERGY.NS's ROE is +2.63%, compared to SANSERA.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BILENERGY.NS is more volatile compared to SANSERA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BILENERGY.NS.Check SANSERA.BO's competition here
BILENERGY.NS vs HAPPYFORGE.NS Comparison February 2026
BILENERGY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BILENERGY.NS stands at 139.5M. In comparison, HAPPYFORGE.NS has a market cap of 127.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BILENERGY.NS is priced at ₹0.60, while HAPPYFORGE.NS trades at ₹1,290.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BILENERGY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas HAPPYFORGE.NS's P/E ratio is 44.47. In terms of profitability, BILENERGY.NS's ROE is +2.63%, compared to HAPPYFORGE.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BILENERGY.NS is more volatile compared to HAPPYFORGE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BILENERGY.NS.Check HAPPYFORGE.NS's competition here
BILENERGY.NS vs GRAVITA.BO Comparison February 2026
BILENERGY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BILENERGY.NS stands at 139.5M. In comparison, GRAVITA.BO has a market cap of 115.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BILENERGY.NS is priced at ₹0.60, while GRAVITA.BO trades at ₹1,631.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BILENERGY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas GRAVITA.BO's P/E ratio is 30.13. In terms of profitability, BILENERGY.NS's ROE is +2.63%, compared to GRAVITA.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BILENERGY.NS is more volatile compared to GRAVITA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BILENERGY.NS.Check GRAVITA.BO's competition here
BILENERGY.NS vs GRAVITA.NS Comparison February 2026
BILENERGY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BILENERGY.NS stands at 139.5M. In comparison, GRAVITA.NS has a market cap of 115.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BILENERGY.NS is priced at ₹0.60, while GRAVITA.NS trades at ₹1,632.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BILENERGY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas GRAVITA.NS's P/E ratio is 30.13. In terms of profitability, BILENERGY.NS's ROE is +2.63%, compared to GRAVITA.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BILENERGY.NS is more volatile compared to GRAVITA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BILENERGY.NS.Check GRAVITA.NS's competition here
BILENERGY.NS vs RHIM.BO Comparison February 2026
BILENERGY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BILENERGY.NS stands at 139.5M. In comparison, RHIM.BO has a market cap of 94.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BILENERGY.NS is priced at ₹0.60, while RHIM.BO trades at ₹464.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BILENERGY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas RHIM.BO's P/E ratio is 55.25. In terms of profitability, BILENERGY.NS's ROE is +2.63%, compared to RHIM.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BILENERGY.NS is more volatile compared to RHIM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BILENERGY.NS.Check RHIM.BO's competition here
BILENERGY.NS vs RHIM.NS Comparison February 2026
BILENERGY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BILENERGY.NS stands at 139.5M. In comparison, RHIM.NS has a market cap of 94.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BILENERGY.NS is priced at ₹0.60, while RHIM.NS trades at ₹464.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BILENERGY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas RHIM.NS's P/E ratio is 55.11. In terms of profitability, BILENERGY.NS's ROE is +2.63%, compared to RHIM.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BILENERGY.NS is more volatile compared to RHIM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BILENERGY.NS.Check RHIM.NS's competition here
BILENERGY.NS vs KIRLFER.NS Comparison February 2026
BILENERGY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BILENERGY.NS stands at 139.5M. In comparison, KIRLFER.NS has a market cap of 76.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BILENERGY.NS is priced at ₹0.60, while KIRLFER.NS trades at ₹460.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BILENERGY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas KIRLFER.NS's P/E ratio is 18.57. In terms of profitability, BILENERGY.NS's ROE is +2.63%, compared to KIRLFER.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BILENERGY.NS is more volatile compared to KIRLFER.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BILENERGY.NS.Check KIRLFER.NS's competition here
BILENERGY.NS vs KIRLFER.BO Comparison February 2026
BILENERGY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BILENERGY.NS stands at 139.5M. In comparison, KIRLFER.BO has a market cap of 69.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BILENERGY.NS is priced at ₹0.60, while KIRLFER.BO trades at ₹430.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BILENERGY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas KIRLFER.BO's P/E ratio is 21.34. In terms of profitability, BILENERGY.NS's ROE is +2.63%, compared to KIRLFER.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BILENERGY.NS is more volatile compared to KIRLFER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BILENERGY.NS.Check KIRLFER.BO's competition here
BILENERGY.NS vs BALUFORGE.NS Comparison February 2026
BILENERGY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BILENERGY.NS stands at 139.5M. In comparison, BALUFORGE.NS has a market cap of 56.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BILENERGY.NS is priced at ₹0.60, while BALUFORGE.NS trades at ₹484.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BILENERGY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas BALUFORGE.NS's P/E ratio is 22.16. In terms of profitability, BILENERGY.NS's ROE is +2.63%, compared to BALUFORGE.NS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, BILENERGY.NS is more volatile compared to BALUFORGE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BILENERGY.NS.Check BALUFORGE.NS's competition here
BILENERGY.NS vs PITTIENG.NS Comparison February 2026
BILENERGY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BILENERGY.NS stands at 139.5M. In comparison, PITTIENG.NS has a market cap of 33.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BILENERGY.NS is priced at ₹0.60, while PITTIENG.NS trades at ₹905.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BILENERGY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas PITTIENG.NS's P/E ratio is 25.64. In terms of profitability, BILENERGY.NS's ROE is +2.63%, compared to PITTIENG.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BILENERGY.NS is more volatile compared to PITTIENG.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BILENERGY.NS.Check PITTIENG.NS's competition here
BILENERGY.NS vs PITTIENG.BO Comparison February 2026
BILENERGY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BILENERGY.NS stands at 139.5M. In comparison, PITTIENG.BO has a market cap of 33.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BILENERGY.NS is priced at ₹0.60, while PITTIENG.BO trades at ₹894.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BILENERGY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas PITTIENG.BO's P/E ratio is 25.60. In terms of profitability, BILENERGY.NS's ROE is +2.63%, compared to PITTIENG.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BILENERGY.NS is more volatile compared to PITTIENG.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BILENERGY.NS.Check PITTIENG.BO's competition here
BILENERGY.NS vs KIRLOSIND.NS Comparison February 2026
BILENERGY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BILENERGY.NS stands at 139.5M. In comparison, KIRLOSIND.NS has a market cap of 31.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BILENERGY.NS is priced at ₹0.60, while KIRLOSIND.NS trades at ₹3,000.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BILENERGY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas KIRLOSIND.NS's P/E ratio is 18.74. In terms of profitability, BILENERGY.NS's ROE is +2.63%, compared to KIRLOSIND.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BILENERGY.NS is more volatile compared to KIRLOSIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BILENERGY.NS.Check KIRLOSIND.NS's competition here
BILENERGY.NS vs KIRLOSIND.BO Comparison February 2026
BILENERGY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BILENERGY.NS stands at 139.5M. In comparison, KIRLOSIND.BO has a market cap of 31.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BILENERGY.NS is priced at ₹0.60, while KIRLOSIND.BO trades at ₹2,994.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BILENERGY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas KIRLOSIND.BO's P/E ratio is 18.70. In terms of profitability, BILENERGY.NS's ROE is +2.63%, compared to KIRLOSIND.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BILENERGY.NS is more volatile compared to KIRLOSIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BILENERGY.NS.Check KIRLOSIND.BO's competition here
BILENERGY.NS vs SUNCLAY.NS Comparison February 2026
BILENERGY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BILENERGY.NS stands at 139.5M. In comparison, SUNCLAY.NS has a market cap of 29.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BILENERGY.NS is priced at ₹0.60, while SUNCLAY.NS trades at ₹1,359.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BILENERGY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas SUNCLAY.NS's P/E ratio is -141.67. In terms of profitability, BILENERGY.NS's ROE is +2.63%, compared to SUNCLAY.NS's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BILENERGY.NS is more volatile compared to SUNCLAY.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BILENERGY.NS.Check SUNCLAY.NS's competition here
BILENERGY.NS vs AEROFLEX.NS Comparison February 2026
BILENERGY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BILENERGY.NS stands at 139.5M. In comparison, AEROFLEX.NS has a market cap of 28.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BILENERGY.NS is priced at ₹0.60, while AEROFLEX.NS trades at ₹228.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BILENERGY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas AEROFLEX.NS's P/E ratio is 58.76. In terms of profitability, BILENERGY.NS's ROE is +2.63%, compared to AEROFLEX.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BILENERGY.NS is more volatile compared to AEROFLEX.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BILENERGY.NS.Check AEROFLEX.NS's competition here
BILENERGY.NS vs AEROFLEX.BO Comparison February 2026
BILENERGY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BILENERGY.NS stands at 139.5M. In comparison, AEROFLEX.BO has a market cap of 28.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BILENERGY.NS is priced at ₹0.60, while AEROFLEX.BO trades at ₹227.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BILENERGY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas AEROFLEX.BO's P/E ratio is 58.66. In terms of profitability, BILENERGY.NS's ROE is +2.63%, compared to AEROFLEX.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BILENERGY.NS is more volatile compared to AEROFLEX.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BILENERGY.NS.Check AEROFLEX.BO's competition here
BILENERGY.NS vs SBCL.NS Comparison February 2026
BILENERGY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BILENERGY.NS stands at 139.5M. In comparison, SBCL.NS has a market cap of 28.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BILENERGY.NS is priced at ₹0.60, while SBCL.NS trades at ₹488.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BILENERGY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas SBCL.NS's P/E ratio is 31.51. In terms of profitability, BILENERGY.NS's ROE is +2.63%, compared to SBCL.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BILENERGY.NS is more volatile compared to SBCL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BILENERGY.NS.Check SBCL.NS's competition here
BILENERGY.NS vs SBCL.BO Comparison February 2026
BILENERGY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BILENERGY.NS stands at 139.5M. In comparison, SBCL.BO has a market cap of 28.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BILENERGY.NS is priced at ₹0.60, while SBCL.BO trades at ₹489.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BILENERGY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas SBCL.BO's P/E ratio is 31.49. In terms of profitability, BILENERGY.NS's ROE is +2.63%, compared to SBCL.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BILENERGY.NS is more volatile compared to SBCL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BILENERGY.NS.Check SBCL.BO's competition here
BILENERGY.NS vs SHBCLQ.BO Comparison February 2026
BILENERGY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BILENERGY.NS stands at 139.5M. In comparison, SHBCLQ.BO has a market cap of 23.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BILENERGY.NS is priced at ₹0.60, while SHBCLQ.BO trades at ₹601.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BILENERGY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas SHBCLQ.BO's P/E ratio is 193.16. In terms of profitability, BILENERGY.NS's ROE is +2.63%, compared to SHBCLQ.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BILENERGY.NS is more volatile compared to SHBCLQ.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BILENERGY.NS.Check SHBCLQ.BO's competition here
BILENERGY.NS vs MMFL.NS Comparison February 2026
BILENERGY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BILENERGY.NS stands at 139.5M. In comparison, MMFL.NS has a market cap of 23B. Regarding current trading prices, BILENERGY.NS is priced at ₹0.60, while MMFL.NS trades at ₹488.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BILENERGY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas MMFL.NS's P/E ratio is 24.05. In terms of profitability, BILENERGY.NS's ROE is +2.63%, compared to MMFL.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BILENERGY.NS is more volatile compared to MMFL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BILENERGY.NS.Check MMFL.NS's competition here
BILENERGY.NS vs MMFL.BO Comparison February 2026
BILENERGY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BILENERGY.NS stands at 139.5M. In comparison, MMFL.BO has a market cap of 22.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BILENERGY.NS is priced at ₹0.60, while MMFL.BO trades at ₹488.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BILENERGY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas MMFL.BO's P/E ratio is 23.96. In terms of profitability, BILENERGY.NS's ROE is +2.63%, compared to MMFL.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BILENERGY.NS is more volatile compared to MMFL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BILENERGY.NS.Check MMFL.BO's competition here
BILENERGY.NS vs FRONTSP.BO Comparison February 2026
BILENERGY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BILENERGY.NS stands at 139.5M. In comparison, FRONTSP.BO has a market cap of 17.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BILENERGY.NS is priced at ₹0.60, while FRONTSP.BO trades at ₹4,319.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BILENERGY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas FRONTSP.BO's P/E ratio is 33.92. In terms of profitability, BILENERGY.NS's ROE is +2.63%, compared to FRONTSP.BO's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, BILENERGY.NS is more volatile compared to FRONTSP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BILENERGY.NS.Check FRONTSP.BO's competition here
BILENERGY.NS vs DEEDEV.NS Comparison February 2026
BILENERGY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BILENERGY.NS stands at 139.5M. In comparison, DEEDEV.NS has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, BILENERGY.NS is priced at ₹0.60, while DEEDEV.NS trades at ₹208.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BILENERGY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas DEEDEV.NS's P/E ratio is 19.39. In terms of profitability, BILENERGY.NS's ROE is +2.63%, compared to DEEDEV.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BILENERGY.NS is more volatile compared to DEEDEV.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BILENERGY.NS.Check DEEDEV.NS's competition here
BILENERGY.NS vs AMIC.BO Comparison February 2026
BILENERGY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BILENERGY.NS stands at 139.5M. In comparison, AMIC.BO has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BILENERGY.NS is priced at ₹0.60, while AMIC.BO trades at ₹1,312.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BILENERGY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas AMIC.BO's P/E ratio is 85.17. In terms of profitability, BILENERGY.NS's ROE is +2.63%, compared to AMIC.BO's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, BILENERGY.NS is more volatile compared to AMIC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BILENERGY.NS.Check AMIC.BO's competition here
BILENERGY.NS vs ALICON.NS Comparison February 2026
BILENERGY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BILENERGY.NS stands at 139.5M. In comparison, ALICON.NS has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BILENERGY.NS is priced at ₹0.60, while ALICON.NS trades at ₹792.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BILENERGY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas ALICON.NS's P/E ratio is 39.45. In terms of profitability, BILENERGY.NS's ROE is +2.63%, compared to ALICON.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BILENERGY.NS is more volatile compared to ALICON.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BILENERGY.NS.Check ALICON.NS's competition here
BILENERGY.NS vs ALICON.BO Comparison February 2026
BILENERGY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BILENERGY.NS stands at 139.5M. In comparison, ALICON.BO has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BILENERGY.NS is priced at ₹0.60, while ALICON.BO trades at ₹799.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BILENERGY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas ALICON.BO's P/E ratio is 39.44. In terms of profitability, BILENERGY.NS's ROE is +2.63%, compared to ALICON.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BILENERGY.NS is more volatile compared to ALICON.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BILENERGY.NS.Check ALICON.BO's competition here
BILENERGY.NS vs MANAKCOAT.NS Comparison February 2026
BILENERGY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BILENERGY.NS stands at 139.5M. In comparison, MANAKCOAT.NS has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BILENERGY.NS is priced at ₹0.60, while MANAKCOAT.NS trades at ₹121.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BILENERGY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas MANAKCOAT.NS's P/E ratio is 29.33. In terms of profitability, BILENERGY.NS's ROE is +2.63%, compared to MANAKCOAT.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BILENERGY.NS is more volatile compared to MANAKCOAT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BILENERGY.NS.Check MANAKCOAT.NS's competition here
BILENERGY.NS vs MANAKCOAT.BO Comparison February 2026
BILENERGY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BILENERGY.NS stands at 139.5M. In comparison, MANAKCOAT.BO has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BILENERGY.NS is priced at ₹0.60, while MANAKCOAT.BO trades at ₹121.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BILENERGY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas MANAKCOAT.BO's P/E ratio is 29.10. In terms of profitability, BILENERGY.NS's ROE is +2.63%, compared to MANAKCOAT.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BILENERGY.NS is more volatile compared to MANAKCOAT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BILENERGY.NS.Check MANAKCOAT.BO's competition here
BILENERGY.NS vs GANDHITUBE.NS Comparison February 2026
BILENERGY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BILENERGY.NS stands at 139.5M. In comparison, GANDHITUBE.NS has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BILENERGY.NS is priced at ₹0.60, while GANDHITUBE.NS trades at ₹898.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BILENERGY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas GANDHITUBE.NS's P/E ratio is 15.21. In terms of profitability, BILENERGY.NS's ROE is +2.63%, compared to GANDHITUBE.NS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, BILENERGY.NS is more volatile compared to GANDHITUBE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BILENERGY.NS.Check GANDHITUBE.NS's competition here
BILENERGY.NS vs GANDHITUBE.BO Comparison February 2026
BILENERGY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BILENERGY.NS stands at 139.5M. In comparison, GANDHITUBE.BO has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BILENERGY.NS is priced at ₹0.60, while GANDHITUBE.BO trades at ₹903.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BILENERGY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas GANDHITUBE.BO's P/E ratio is 15.16. In terms of profitability, BILENERGY.NS's ROE is +2.63%, compared to GANDHITUBE.BO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, BILENERGY.NS is more volatile compared to GANDHITUBE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BILENERGY.NS.Check GANDHITUBE.BO's competition here
BILENERGY.NS vs NELCAST.BO Comparison February 2026
BILENERGY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BILENERGY.NS stands at 139.5M. In comparison, NELCAST.BO has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BILENERGY.NS is priced at ₹0.60, while NELCAST.BO trades at ₹120.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BILENERGY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas NELCAST.BO's P/E ratio is 22.09. In terms of profitability, BILENERGY.NS's ROE is +2.63%, compared to NELCAST.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BILENERGY.NS is more volatile compared to NELCAST.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BILENERGY.NS.Check NELCAST.BO's competition here
BILENERGY.NS vs NELCAST.NS Comparison February 2026
BILENERGY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BILENERGY.NS stands at 139.5M. In comparison, NELCAST.NS has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BILENERGY.NS is priced at ₹0.60, while NELCAST.NS trades at ₹120.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BILENERGY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas NELCAST.NS's P/E ratio is 22.00. In terms of profitability, BILENERGY.NS's ROE is +2.63%, compared to NELCAST.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BILENERGY.NS is more volatile compared to NELCAST.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BILENERGY.NS.Check NELCAST.NS's competition here
BILENERGY.NS vs ELECTHERM.NS Comparison February 2026
BILENERGY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BILENERGY.NS stands at 139.5M. In comparison, ELECTHERM.NS has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BILENERGY.NS is priced at ₹0.60, while ELECTHERM.NS trades at ₹721.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BILENERGY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas ELECTHERM.NS's P/E ratio is 3.34. In terms of profitability, BILENERGY.NS's ROE is +2.63%, compared to ELECTHERM.NS's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, BILENERGY.NS is more volatile compared to ELECTHERM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BILENERGY.NS.Check ELECTHERM.NS's competition here
BILENERGY.NS vs TEMBO.NS Comparison February 2026
BILENERGY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BILENERGY.NS stands at 139.5M. In comparison, TEMBO.NS has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BILENERGY.NS is priced at ₹0.60, while TEMBO.NS trades at ₹535.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BILENERGY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas TEMBO.NS's P/E ratio is 12.83. In terms of profitability, BILENERGY.NS's ROE is +2.63%, compared to TEMBO.NS's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, BILENERGY.NS is more volatile compared to TEMBO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BILENERGY.NS.Check TEMBO.NS's competition here
BILENERGY.NS vs RAJGLOWIR.BO Comparison February 2026
BILENERGY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BILENERGY.NS stands at 139.5M. In comparison, RAJGLOWIR.BO has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, BILENERGY.NS is priced at ₹0.60, while RAJGLOWIR.BO trades at ₹786.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BILENERGY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas RAJGLOWIR.BO's P/E ratio is 32.18. In terms of profitability, BILENERGY.NS's ROE is +2.63%, compared to RAJGLOWIR.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BILENERGY.NS is more volatile compared to RAJGLOWIR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BILENERGY.NS.Check RAJGLOWIR.BO's competition here
BILENERGY.NS vs SGIL.NS Comparison February 2026
BILENERGY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BILENERGY.NS stands at 139.5M. In comparison, SGIL.NS has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BILENERGY.NS is priced at ₹0.60, while SGIL.NS trades at ₹515.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BILENERGY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas SGIL.NS's P/E ratio is 96.05. In terms of profitability, BILENERGY.NS's ROE is +2.63%, compared to SGIL.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BILENERGY.NS is more volatile compared to SGIL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BILENERGY.NS.Check SGIL.NS's competition here
BILENERGY.NS vs SGIL.BO Comparison February 2026
BILENERGY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BILENERGY.NS stands at 139.5M. In comparison, SGIL.BO has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BILENERGY.NS is priced at ₹0.60, while SGIL.BO trades at ₹510.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BILENERGY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas SGIL.BO's P/E ratio is 96.53. In terms of profitability, BILENERGY.NS's ROE is +2.63%, compared to SGIL.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BILENERGY.NS is more volatile compared to SGIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BILENERGY.NS.Check SGIL.BO's competition here
BILENERGY.NS vs UNIABEXAL.BO Comparison February 2026
BILENERGY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BILENERGY.NS stands at 139.5M. In comparison, UNIABEXAL.BO has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BILENERGY.NS is priced at ₹0.60, while UNIABEXAL.BO trades at ₹3,200.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BILENERGY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas UNIABEXAL.BO's P/E ratio is 18.29. In terms of profitability, BILENERGY.NS's ROE is +2.63%, compared to UNIABEXAL.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, BILENERGY.NS is more volatile compared to UNIABEXAL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BILENERGY.NS.Check UNIABEXAL.BO's competition here
BILENERGY.NS vs PRADPME.BO Comparison February 2026
BILENERGY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BILENERGY.NS stands at 139.5M. In comparison, PRADPME.BO has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BILENERGY.NS is priced at ₹0.60, while PRADPME.BO trades at ₹332.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BILENERGY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas PRADPME.BO's P/E ratio is 20.64. In terms of profitability, BILENERGY.NS's ROE is +2.63%, compared to PRADPME.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BILENERGY.NS is more volatile compared to PRADPME.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BILENERGY.NS.Check PRADPME.BO's competition here
BILENERGY.NS vs INVPRECQ.BO Comparison February 2026
BILENERGY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BILENERGY.NS stands at 139.5M. In comparison, INVPRECQ.BO has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BILENERGY.NS is priced at ₹0.60, while INVPRECQ.BO trades at ₹543.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BILENERGY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas INVPRECQ.BO's P/E ratio is 55.18. In terms of profitability, BILENERGY.NS's ROE is +2.63%, compared to INVPRECQ.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BILENERGY.NS is less volatile compared to INVPRECQ.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BILENERGY.NS.Check INVPRECQ.BO's competition here
BILENERGY.NS vs CTCL.BO Comparison February 2026
BILENERGY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BILENERGY.NS stands at 139.5M. In comparison, CTCL.BO has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BILENERGY.NS is priced at ₹0.60, while CTCL.BO trades at ₹200.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BILENERGY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas CTCL.BO's P/E ratio is 39.22. In terms of profitability, BILENERGY.NS's ROE is +2.63%, compared to CTCL.BO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, BILENERGY.NS is more volatile compared to CTCL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BILENERGY.NS.Check CTCL.BO's competition here
BILENERGY.NS vs TIRUPATIFL.NS Comparison February 2026
BILENERGY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BILENERGY.NS stands at 139.5M. In comparison, TIRUPATIFL.NS has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BILENERGY.NS is priced at ₹0.60, while TIRUPATIFL.NS trades at ₹37.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BILENERGY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas TIRUPATIFL.NS's P/E ratio is 82.41. In terms of profitability, BILENERGY.NS's ROE is +2.63%, compared to TIRUPATIFL.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BILENERGY.NS is more volatile compared to TIRUPATIFL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BILENERGY.NS.Check TIRUPATIFL.NS's competition here
BILENERGY.NS vs MAGNAELQ.BO Comparison February 2026
BILENERGY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BILENERGY.NS stands at 139.5M. In comparison, MAGNAELQ.BO has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, BILENERGY.NS is priced at ₹0.60, while MAGNAELQ.BO trades at ₹932.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BILENERGY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas MAGNAELQ.BO's P/E ratio is 19.52. In terms of profitability, BILENERGY.NS's ROE is +2.63%, compared to MAGNAELQ.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BILENERGY.NS is more volatile compared to MAGNAELQ.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BILENERGY.NS.Check MAGNAELQ.BO's competition here
BILENERGY.NS vs MANAKSIA.NS Comparison February 2026
BILENERGY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BILENERGY.NS stands at 139.5M. In comparison, MANAKSIA.NS has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, BILENERGY.NS is priced at ₹0.60, while MANAKSIA.NS trades at ₹61.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BILENERGY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas MANAKSIA.NS's P/E ratio is 7.68. In terms of profitability, BILENERGY.NS's ROE is +2.63%, compared to MANAKSIA.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BILENERGY.NS is more volatile compared to MANAKSIA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BILENERGY.NS.Check MANAKSIA.NS's competition here
BILENERGY.NS vs MANAKSIA.BO Comparison February 2026
BILENERGY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BILENERGY.NS stands at 139.5M. In comparison, MANAKSIA.BO has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, BILENERGY.NS is priced at ₹0.60, while MANAKSIA.BO trades at ₹60.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BILENERGY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas MANAKSIA.BO's P/E ratio is 7.68. In terms of profitability, BILENERGY.NS's ROE is +2.63%, compared to MANAKSIA.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BILENERGY.NS is more volatile compared to MANAKSIA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BILENERGY.NS.Check MANAKSIA.BO's competition here
BILENERGY.NS vs ROLEXRINGS.BO Comparison February 2026
BILENERGY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BILENERGY.NS stands at 139.5M. In comparison, ROLEXRINGS.BO has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BILENERGY.NS is priced at ₹0.60, while ROLEXRINGS.BO trades at ₹143.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BILENERGY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas ROLEXRINGS.BO's P/E ratio is 19.61. In terms of profitability, BILENERGY.NS's ROE is +2.63%, compared to ROLEXRINGS.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BILENERGY.NS is more volatile compared to ROLEXRINGS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BILENERGY.NS.Check ROLEXRINGS.BO's competition here
BILENERGY.NS vs ROLEXRINGS.NS Comparison February 2026
BILENERGY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BILENERGY.NS stands at 139.5M. In comparison, ROLEXRINGS.NS has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BILENERGY.NS is priced at ₹0.60, while ROLEXRINGS.NS trades at ₹142.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BILENERGY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas ROLEXRINGS.NS's P/E ratio is 19.62. In terms of profitability, BILENERGY.NS's ROE is +2.63%, compared to ROLEXRINGS.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BILENERGY.NS is more volatile compared to ROLEXRINGS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BILENERGY.NS.Check ROLEXRINGS.NS's competition here
BILENERGY.NS vs SYNTHFO.BO Comparison February 2026
BILENERGY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BILENERGY.NS stands at 139.5M. In comparison, SYNTHFO.BO has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BILENERGY.NS is priced at ₹0.60, while SYNTHFO.BO trades at ₹2,052.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BILENERGY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas SYNTHFO.BO's P/E ratio is 80.50. In terms of profitability, BILENERGY.NS's ROE is +2.63%, compared to SYNTHFO.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BILENERGY.NS is more volatile compared to SYNTHFO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BILENERGY.NS.Check SYNTHFO.BO's competition here
BILENERGY.NS vs SIMPLEXCAS.BO Comparison February 2026
BILENERGY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BILENERGY.NS stands at 139.5M. In comparison, SIMPLEXCAS.BO has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BILENERGY.NS is priced at ₹0.60, while SIMPLEXCAS.BO trades at ₹451.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BILENERGY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas SIMPLEXCAS.BO's P/E ratio is 17.06. In terms of profitability, BILENERGY.NS's ROE is +2.63%, compared to SIMPLEXCAS.BO's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, BILENERGY.NS is more volatile compared to SIMPLEXCAS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BILENERGY.NS.Check SIMPLEXCAS.BO's competition here
BILENERGY.NS vs LGBFORGE.NS Comparison February 2026
BILENERGY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BILENERGY.NS stands at 139.5M. In comparison, LGBFORGE.NS has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BILENERGY.NS is priced at ₹0.60, while LGBFORGE.NS trades at ₹11.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BILENERGY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas LGBFORGE.NS's P/E ratio is -49.75. In terms of profitability, BILENERGY.NS's ROE is +2.63%, compared to LGBFORGE.NS's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BILENERGY.NS is more volatile compared to LGBFORGE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BILENERGY.NS.Check LGBFORGE.NS's competition here
BILENERGY.NS vs DPWIRES.BO Comparison February 2026
BILENERGY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BILENERGY.NS stands at 139.5M. In comparison, DPWIRES.BO has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BILENERGY.NS is priced at ₹0.60, while DPWIRES.BO trades at ₹162.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BILENERGY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas DPWIRES.BO's P/E ratio is 18.29. In terms of profitability, BILENERGY.NS's ROE is +2.63%, compared to DPWIRES.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BILENERGY.NS is more volatile compared to DPWIRES.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BILENERGY.NS.Check DPWIRES.BO's competition here
BILENERGY.NS vs DPWIRES.NS Comparison February 2026
BILENERGY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BILENERGY.NS stands at 139.5M. In comparison, DPWIRES.NS has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BILENERGY.NS is priced at ₹0.60, while DPWIRES.NS trades at ₹161.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BILENERGY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas DPWIRES.NS's P/E ratio is 18.23. In terms of profitability, BILENERGY.NS's ROE is +2.63%, compared to DPWIRES.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BILENERGY.NS is more volatile compared to DPWIRES.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BILENERGY.NS.Check DPWIRES.NS's competition here
BILENERGY.NS vs AEL.BO Comparison February 2026
BILENERGY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BILENERGY.NS stands at 139.5M. In comparison, AEL.BO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BILENERGY.NS is priced at ₹0.60, while AEL.BO trades at ₹143.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BILENERGY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas AEL.BO's P/E ratio is 22.54. In terms of profitability, BILENERGY.NS's ROE is +2.63%, compared to AEL.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BILENERGY.NS is more volatile compared to AEL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BILENERGY.NS.Check AEL.BO's competition here
BILENERGY.NS vs ALPHAIND.BO Comparison February 2026
BILENERGY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BILENERGY.NS stands at 139.5M. In comparison, ALPHAIND.BO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BILENERGY.NS is priced at ₹0.60, while ALPHAIND.BO trades at ₹164.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BILENERGY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas ALPHAIND.BO's P/E ratio is 45.56. In terms of profitability, BILENERGY.NS's ROE is +2.63%, compared to ALPHAIND.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BILENERGY.NS is less volatile compared to ALPHAIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BILENERGY.NS.Check ALPHAIND.BO's competition here
BILENERGY.NS vs LGBFORGE.BO Comparison February 2026
BILENERGY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BILENERGY.NS stands at 139.5M. In comparison, LGBFORGE.BO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BILENERGY.NS is priced at ₹0.60, while LGBFORGE.BO trades at ₹6.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BILENERGY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas LGBFORGE.BO's P/E ratio is -77.00. In terms of profitability, BILENERGY.NS's ROE is +2.63%, compared to LGBFORGE.BO's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BILENERGY.NS is more volatile compared to LGBFORGE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BILENERGY.NS.Check LGBFORGE.BO's competition here
BILENERGY.NS vs SIMMOND.BO Comparison February 2026
BILENERGY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BILENERGY.NS stands at 139.5M. In comparison, SIMMOND.BO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BILENERGY.NS is priced at ₹0.60, while SIMMOND.BO trades at ₹149.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BILENERGY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas SIMMOND.BO's P/E ratio is 12.34. In terms of profitability, BILENERGY.NS's ROE is +2.63%, compared to SIMMOND.BO's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, BILENERGY.NS is more volatile compared to SIMMOND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BILENERGY.NS.Check SIMMOND.BO's competition here
BILENERGY.NS vs COSMOFE.BO Comparison February 2026
BILENERGY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BILENERGY.NS stands at 139.5M. In comparison, COSMOFE.BO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BILENERGY.NS is priced at ₹0.60, while COSMOFE.BO trades at ₹121.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BILENERGY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas COSMOFE.BO's P/E ratio is -45.78. In terms of profitability, BILENERGY.NS's ROE is +2.63%, compared to COSMOFE.BO's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BILENERGY.NS is more volatile compared to COSMOFE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BILENERGY.NS.Check COSMOFE.BO's competition here
BILENERGY.NS vs DCM.NS Comparison February 2026
BILENERGY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BILENERGY.NS stands at 139.5M. In comparison, DCM.NS has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BILENERGY.NS is priced at ₹0.60, while DCM.NS trades at ₹83.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BILENERGY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas DCM.NS's P/E ratio is 5.91. In terms of profitability, BILENERGY.NS's ROE is +2.63%, compared to DCM.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BILENERGY.NS is more volatile compared to DCM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BILENERGY.NS.Check DCM.NS's competition here
BILENERGY.NS vs GALXBRG.BO Comparison February 2026
BILENERGY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BILENERGY.NS stands at 139.5M. In comparison, GALXBRG.BO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BILENERGY.NS is priced at ₹0.60, while GALXBRG.BO trades at ₹484.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BILENERGY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas GALXBRG.BO's P/E ratio is 24.19. In terms of profitability, BILENERGY.NS's ROE is +2.63%, compared to GALXBRG.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BILENERGY.NS is less volatile compared to GALXBRG.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BILENERGY.NS.Check GALXBRG.BO's competition here
BILENERGY.NS vs DCM.BO Comparison February 2026
BILENERGY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BILENERGY.NS stands at 139.5M. In comparison, DCM.BO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BILENERGY.NS is priced at ₹0.60, while DCM.BO trades at ₹83.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BILENERGY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas DCM.BO's P/E ratio is 5.87. In terms of profitability, BILENERGY.NS's ROE is +2.63%, compared to DCM.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BILENERGY.NS is more volatile compared to DCM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BILENERGY.NS.Check DCM.BO's competition here
BILENERGY.NS vs NATFIT.BO Comparison February 2026
BILENERGY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BILENERGY.NS stands at 139.5M. In comparison, NATFIT.BO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BILENERGY.NS is priced at ₹0.60, while NATFIT.BO trades at ₹161.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BILENERGY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas NATFIT.BO's P/E ratio is 6.70. In terms of profitability, BILENERGY.NS's ROE is +2.63%, compared to NATFIT.BO's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, BILENERGY.NS is less volatile compared to NATFIT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BILENERGY.NS.Check NATFIT.BO's competition here
BILENERGY.NS vs KVFORGE.BO Comparison February 2026
BILENERGY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BILENERGY.NS stands at 139.5M. In comparison, KVFORGE.BO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BILENERGY.NS is priced at ₹0.60, while KVFORGE.BO trades at ₹132.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BILENERGY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas KVFORGE.BO's P/E ratio is 19.98. In terms of profitability, BILENERGY.NS's ROE is +2.63%, compared to KVFORGE.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BILENERGY.NS is more volatile compared to KVFORGE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BILENERGY.NS.Check KVFORGE.BO's competition here
BILENERGY.NS vs MUL.BO Comparison February 2026
BILENERGY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BILENERGY.NS stands at 139.5M. In comparison, MUL.BO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BILENERGY.NS is priced at ₹0.60, while MUL.BO trades at ₹9.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BILENERGY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas MUL.BO's P/E ratio is 5.06. In terms of profitability, BILENERGY.NS's ROE is +2.63%, compared to MUL.BO's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, BILENERGY.NS is more volatile compared to MUL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BILENERGY.NS.Check MUL.BO's competition here
BILENERGY.NS vs SMLT.NS Comparison February 2026
BILENERGY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BILENERGY.NS stands at 139.5M. In comparison, SMLT.NS has a market cap of 976.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BILENERGY.NS is priced at ₹0.60, while SMLT.NS trades at ₹71.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BILENERGY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas SMLT.NS's P/E ratio is 25.76. In terms of profitability, BILENERGY.NS's ROE is +2.63%, compared to SMLT.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BILENERGY.NS is more volatile compared to SMLT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BILENERGY.NS.Check SMLT.NS's competition here
BILENERGY.NS vs SMLT.BO Comparison February 2026
BILENERGY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BILENERGY.NS stands at 139.5M. In comparison, SMLT.BO has a market cap of 969.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BILENERGY.NS is priced at ₹0.60, while SMLT.BO trades at ₹72.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BILENERGY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas SMLT.BO's P/E ratio is 25.58. In terms of profitability, BILENERGY.NS's ROE is +2.63%, compared to SMLT.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BILENERGY.NS is more volatile compared to SMLT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BILENERGY.NS.Check SMLT.BO's competition here
BILENERGY.NS vs AUTOPINS.BO Comparison February 2026
BILENERGY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BILENERGY.NS stands at 139.5M. In comparison, AUTOPINS.BO has a market cap of 930.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BILENERGY.NS is priced at ₹0.60, while AUTOPINS.BO trades at ₹166.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BILENERGY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas AUTOPINS.BO's P/E ratio is 379.07. In terms of profitability, BILENERGY.NS's ROE is +2.63%, compared to AUTOPINS.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BILENERGY.NS is more volatile compared to AUTOPINS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BILENERGY.NS.Check AUTOPINS.BO's competition here
BILENERGY.NS vs RAPICUT.BO Comparison February 2026
BILENERGY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BILENERGY.NS stands at 139.5M. In comparison, RAPICUT.BO has a market cap of 810.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BILENERGY.NS is priced at ₹0.60, while RAPICUT.BO trades at ₹144.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BILENERGY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas RAPICUT.BO's P/E ratio is -56.50. In terms of profitability, BILENERGY.NS's ROE is +2.63%, compared to RAPICUT.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BILENERGY.NS is more volatile compared to RAPICUT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BILENERGY.NS.Check RAPICUT.BO's competition here
BILENERGY.NS vs SMFIL.BO Comparison February 2026
BILENERGY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BILENERGY.NS stands at 139.5M. In comparison, SMFIL.BO has a market cap of 682.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BILENERGY.NS is priced at ₹0.60, while SMFIL.BO trades at ₹6.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BILENERGY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas SMFIL.BO's P/E ratio is 95.57. In terms of profitability, BILENERGY.NS's ROE is +2.63%, compared to SMFIL.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BILENERGY.NS is less volatile compared to SMFIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BILENERGY.NS.Check SMFIL.BO's competition here
BILENERGY.NS vs VISHALBL.BO Comparison February 2026
BILENERGY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BILENERGY.NS stands at 139.5M. In comparison, VISHALBL.BO has a market cap of 652M. Regarding current trading prices, BILENERGY.NS is priced at ₹0.60, while VISHALBL.BO trades at ₹61.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BILENERGY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas VISHALBL.BO's P/E ratio is -37.76. In terms of profitability, BILENERGY.NS's ROE is +2.63%, compared to VISHALBL.BO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BILENERGY.NS is more volatile compared to VISHALBL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BILENERGY.NS.Check VISHALBL.BO's competition here
BILENERGY.NS vs DECANBRG.BO Comparison February 2026
BILENERGY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BILENERGY.NS stands at 139.5M. In comparison, DECANBRG.BO has a market cap of 650.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BILENERGY.NS is priced at ₹0.60, while DECANBRG.BO trades at ₹298.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BILENERGY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas DECANBRG.BO's P/E ratio is -324.02. In terms of profitability, BILENERGY.NS's ROE is +2.63%, compared to DECANBRG.BO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BILENERGY.NS is more volatile compared to DECANBRG.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BILENERGY.NS.Check DECANBRG.BO's competition here
BILENERGY.NS vs HILTON.BO Comparison February 2026
BILENERGY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BILENERGY.NS stands at 139.5M. In comparison, HILTON.BO has a market cap of 476.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BILENERGY.NS is priced at ₹0.60, while HILTON.BO trades at ₹21.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BILENERGY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas HILTON.BO's P/E ratio is 7.97. In terms of profitability, BILENERGY.NS's ROE is +2.63%, compared to HILTON.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BILENERGY.NS is less volatile compared to HILTON.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BILENERGY.NS.Check HILTON.BO's competition here
BILENERGY.NS vs HILTON.NS Comparison February 2026
BILENERGY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BILENERGY.NS stands at 139.5M. In comparison, HILTON.NS has a market cap of 473M. Regarding current trading prices, BILENERGY.NS is priced at ₹0.60, while HILTON.NS trades at ₹21.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BILENERGY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas HILTON.NS's P/E ratio is 7.91. In terms of profitability, BILENERGY.NS's ROE is +2.63%, compared to HILTON.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BILENERGY.NS is less volatile compared to HILTON.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BILENERGY.NS.Check HILTON.NS's competition here
BILENERGY.NS vs GANGAFORGE.NS Comparison February 2026
BILENERGY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BILENERGY.NS stands at 139.5M. In comparison, GANGAFORGE.NS has a market cap of 430M. Regarding current trading prices, BILENERGY.NS is priced at ₹0.60, while GANGAFORGE.NS trades at ₹3.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BILENERGY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas GANGAFORGE.NS's P/E ratio is -13.87. In terms of profitability, BILENERGY.NS's ROE is +2.63%, compared to GANGAFORGE.NS's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BILENERGY.NS is more volatile compared to GANGAFORGE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BILENERGY.NS.Check GANGAFORGE.NS's competition here
BILENERGY.NS vs AUSTENG.BO Comparison February 2026
BILENERGY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BILENERGY.NS stands at 139.5M. In comparison, AUSTENG.BO has a market cap of 423.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BILENERGY.NS is priced at ₹0.60, while AUSTENG.BO trades at ₹120.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BILENERGY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas AUSTENG.BO's P/E ratio is 9.68. In terms of profitability, BILENERGY.NS's ROE is +2.63%, compared to AUSTENG.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BILENERGY.NS is more volatile compared to AUSTENG.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BILENERGY.NS.Check AUSTENG.BO's competition here
BILENERGY.NS vs RELICAB.BO Comparison February 2026
BILENERGY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BILENERGY.NS stands at 139.5M. In comparison, RELICAB.BO has a market cap of 384.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BILENERGY.NS is priced at ₹0.60, while RELICAB.BO trades at ₹40.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BILENERGY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas RELICAB.BO's P/E ratio is 28.03. In terms of profitability, BILENERGY.NS's ROE is +2.63%, compared to RELICAB.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BILENERGY.NS is less volatile compared to RELICAB.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BILENERGY.NS.Check RELICAB.BO's competition here
BILENERGY.NS vs CARNATIN.BO Comparison February 2026
BILENERGY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BILENERGY.NS stands at 139.5M. In comparison, CARNATIN.BO has a market cap of 290M. Regarding current trading prices, BILENERGY.NS is priced at ₹0.60, while CARNATIN.BO trades at ₹83.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BILENERGY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas CARNATIN.BO's P/E ratio is -20.97. In terms of profitability, BILENERGY.NS's ROE is +2.63%, compared to CARNATIN.BO's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, BILENERGY.NS is more volatile compared to CARNATIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BILENERGY.NS.Check CARNATIN.BO's competition here
BILENERGY.NS vs SHREMETAL.BO Comparison February 2026
BILENERGY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BILENERGY.NS stands at 139.5M. In comparison, SHREMETAL.BO has a market cap of 257.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BILENERGY.NS is priced at ₹0.60, while SHREMETAL.BO trades at ₹48.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BILENERGY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas SHREMETAL.BO's P/E ratio is 19.98. In terms of profitability, BILENERGY.NS's ROE is +2.63%, compared to SHREMETAL.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BILENERGY.NS is more volatile compared to SHREMETAL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BILENERGY.NS.Check SHREMETAL.BO's competition here
BILENERGY.NS vs BOMBWIR.BO Comparison February 2026
BILENERGY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BILENERGY.NS stands at 139.5M. In comparison, BOMBWIR.BO has a market cap of 251M. Regarding current trading prices, BILENERGY.NS is priced at ₹0.60, while BOMBWIR.BO trades at ₹47.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BILENERGY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas BOMBWIR.BO's P/E ratio is -26.70. In terms of profitability, BILENERGY.NS's ROE is +2.63%, compared to BOMBWIR.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BILENERGY.NS is more volatile compared to BOMBWIR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BILENERGY.NS.Check BOMBWIR.BO's competition here
BILENERGY.NS vs ARCOTECH.NS Comparison February 2026
BILENERGY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BILENERGY.NS stands at 139.5M. In comparison, ARCOTECH.NS has a market cap of 245.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BILENERGY.NS is priced at ₹0.60, while ARCOTECH.NS trades at ₹2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BILENERGY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas ARCOTECH.NS's P/E ratio is -0.82. In terms of profitability, BILENERGY.NS's ROE is +2.63%, compared to ARCOTECH.NS's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, BILENERGY.NS is more volatile compared to ARCOTECH.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BILENERGY.NS.Check ARCOTECH.NS's competition here
BILENERGY.NS vs METALFORGE.NS Comparison February 2026
BILENERGY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BILENERGY.NS stands at 139.5M. In comparison, METALFORGE.NS has a market cap of 178.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BILENERGY.NS is priced at ₹0.60, while METALFORGE.NS trades at ₹4.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BILENERGY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas METALFORGE.NS's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, BILENERGY.NS's ROE is +2.63%, compared to METALFORGE.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BILENERGY.NS is more volatile compared to METALFORGE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BILENERGY.NS.Check METALFORGE.NS's competition here
BILENERGY.NS vs SHIVAGR.BO Comparison February 2026
BILENERGY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BILENERGY.NS stands at 139.5M. In comparison, SHIVAGR.BO has a market cap of 123.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BILENERGY.NS is priced at ₹0.60, while SHIVAGR.BO trades at ₹21.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BILENERGY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas SHIVAGR.BO's P/E ratio is 29.78. In terms of profitability, BILENERGY.NS's ROE is +2.63%, compared to SHIVAGR.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BILENERGY.NS is less volatile compared to SHIVAGR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BILENERGY.NS.Check SHIVAGR.BO's competition here
BILENERGY.NS vs AMFORG.BO Comparison February 2026
BILENERGY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BILENERGY.NS stands at 139.5M. In comparison, AMFORG.BO has a market cap of 103.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BILENERGY.NS is priced at ₹0.60, while AMFORG.BO trades at ₹7.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BILENERGY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas AMFORG.BO's P/E ratio is 47.93. In terms of profitability, BILENERGY.NS's ROE is +2.63%, compared to AMFORG.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BILENERGY.NS is more volatile compared to AMFORG.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BILENERGY.NS.Check AMFORG.BO's competition here
BILENERGY.NS vs GALAGEX.BO Comparison February 2026
BILENERGY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BILENERGY.NS stands at 139.5M. In comparison, GALAGEX.BO has a market cap of 102.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BILENERGY.NS is priced at ₹0.60, while GALAGEX.BO trades at ₹39.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BILENERGY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas GALAGEX.BO's P/E ratio is 2.75. In terms of profitability, BILENERGY.NS's ROE is +2.63%, compared to GALAGEX.BO's ROE of +1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, BILENERGY.NS is more volatile compared to GALAGEX.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BILENERGY.NS.Check GALAGEX.BO's competition here
BILENERGY.NS vs AANCHALISP.BO Comparison February 2026
BILENERGY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BILENERGY.NS stands at 139.5M. In comparison, AANCHALISP.BO has a market cap of 51.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BILENERGY.NS is priced at ₹0.60, while AANCHALISP.BO trades at ₹18.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BILENERGY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas AANCHALISP.BO's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, BILENERGY.NS's ROE is +2.63%, compared to AANCHALISP.BO's ROE of -1.63%. Regarding short-term risk, BILENERGY.NS is more volatile compared to AANCHALISP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BILENERGY.NS.Check AANCHALISP.BO's competition here
BILENERGY.NS vs GOLKONDA.BO Comparison February 2026
BILENERGY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BILENERGY.NS stands at 139.5M. In comparison, GOLKONDA.BO has a market cap of 41.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BILENERGY.NS is priced at ₹0.60, while GOLKONDA.BO trades at ₹7.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BILENERGY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas GOLKONDA.BO's P/E ratio is 79.60. In terms of profitability, BILENERGY.NS's ROE is +2.63%, compared to GOLKONDA.BO's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BILENERGY.NS is less volatile compared to GOLKONDA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BILENERGY.NS.Check GOLKONDA.BO's competition here
BILENERGY.NS vs ROHITFERRO.NS Comparison February 2026
BILENERGY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BILENERGY.NS stands at 139.5M. In comparison, ROHITFERRO.NS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BILENERGY.NS is priced at ₹0.60, while ROHITFERRO.NS trades at ₹28.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BILENERGY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas ROHITFERRO.NS's P/E ratio is -4.58. In terms of profitability, BILENERGY.NS's ROE is +2.63%, compared to ROHITFERRO.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BILENERGY.NS is more volatile compared to ROHITFERRO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BILENERGY.NS.Check ROHITFERRO.NS's competition here