Broadcast Live Digital Corp.
Broadcast Live Digital Corp. (BFLD) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (BFLD) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Specialty Business Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BFLD | $0.00 | +0.00% | 43.8K | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| WOLTF | $157.45 | +1.96% | 36.9B | 28.47 | $5.53 | +1.65% |
| WTKWY | $154.00 | -0.97% | 36.3B | 28.00 | $5.51 | +1.54% |
| BXBLY | $30.49 | -0.29% | 21B | 25.65 | $1.19 | +2.46% |
| BMBLF | $15.27 | -2.58% | 20.9B | 25.45 | $0.60 | +2.70% |
| RKLIF | $4.87 | +0.00% | 12.2B | 37.46 | $0.13 | +2.40% |
| IKTSF | $63.22 | -6.40% | 9.9B | 22.26 | $2.84 | +3.18% |
| IKTSY | $61.69 | -5.66% | 9.7B | 21.71 | $2.84 | +3.29% |
| SDXOF | $63.05 | +0.00% | 9.2B | 11.94 | $5.28 | +15.40% |
| SDXAY | $12.07 | +1.29% | 8.8B | 11.34 | $1.06 | +14.53% |
Stock Comparison
BFLD vs WOLTF Comparison August 2025
BFLD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFLD stands at 43.8K. In comparison, WOLTF has a market cap of 36.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BFLD is priced at $0.00, while WOLTF trades at $157.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFLD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WOLTF's P/E ratio is 28.47. In terms of profitability, BFLD's ROE is N/A, compared to WOLTF's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, BFLD is more volatile compared to WOLTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFLD.Check WOLTF's competition here
BFLD vs WTKWY Comparison August 2025
BFLD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFLD stands at 43.8K. In comparison, WTKWY has a market cap of 36.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BFLD is priced at $0.00, while WTKWY trades at $154.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFLD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WTKWY's P/E ratio is 28.00. In terms of profitability, BFLD's ROE is N/A, compared to WTKWY's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, BFLD is more volatile compared to WTKWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFLD.Check WTKWY's competition here
BFLD vs BXBLY Comparison August 2025
BFLD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFLD stands at 43.8K. In comparison, BXBLY has a market cap of 21B. Regarding current trading prices, BFLD is priced at $0.00, while BXBLY trades at $30.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFLD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BXBLY's P/E ratio is 25.65. In terms of profitability, BFLD's ROE is N/A, compared to BXBLY's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, BFLD is more volatile compared to BXBLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFLD.Check BXBLY's competition here
BFLD vs BMBLF Comparison August 2025
BFLD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFLD stands at 43.8K. In comparison, BMBLF has a market cap of 20.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BFLD is priced at $0.00, while BMBLF trades at $15.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFLD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BMBLF's P/E ratio is 25.45. In terms of profitability, BFLD's ROE is N/A, compared to BMBLF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, BFLD is more volatile compared to BMBLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFLD.Check BMBLF's competition here
BFLD vs RKLIF Comparison August 2025
BFLD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFLD stands at 43.8K. In comparison, RKLIF has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BFLD is priced at $0.00, while RKLIF trades at $4.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFLD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RKLIF's P/E ratio is 37.46. In terms of profitability, BFLD's ROE is N/A, compared to RKLIF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BFLD is more volatile compared to RKLIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFLD.Check RKLIF's competition here
BFLD vs IKTSF Comparison August 2025
BFLD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFLD stands at 43.8K. In comparison, IKTSF has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BFLD is priced at $0.00, while IKTSF trades at $63.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFLD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IKTSF's P/E ratio is 22.26. In terms of profitability, BFLD's ROE is N/A, compared to IKTSF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BFLD is more volatile compared to IKTSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFLD.Check IKTSF's competition here
BFLD vs IKTSY Comparison August 2025
BFLD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFLD stands at 43.8K. In comparison, IKTSY has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BFLD is priced at $0.00, while IKTSY trades at $61.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFLD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IKTSY's P/E ratio is 21.71. In terms of profitability, BFLD's ROE is N/A, compared to IKTSY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BFLD is more volatile compared to IKTSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFLD.Check IKTSY's competition here
BFLD vs SDXOF Comparison August 2025
BFLD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFLD stands at 43.8K. In comparison, SDXOF has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BFLD is priced at $0.00, while SDXOF trades at $63.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFLD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SDXOF's P/E ratio is 11.94. In terms of profitability, BFLD's ROE is N/A, compared to SDXOF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BFLD is more volatile compared to SDXOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFLD.Check SDXOF's competition here
BFLD vs SDXAY Comparison August 2025
BFLD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFLD stands at 43.8K. In comparison, SDXAY has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BFLD is priced at $0.00, while SDXAY trades at $12.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFLD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SDXAY's P/E ratio is 11.34. In terms of profitability, BFLD's ROE is N/A, compared to SDXAY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BFLD is more volatile compared to SDXAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFLD.Check SDXAY's competition here
BFLD vs TOPPY Comparison August 2025
BFLD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFLD stands at 43.8K. In comparison, TOPPY has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, BFLD is priced at $0.00, while TOPPY trades at $13.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFLD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TOPPY's P/E ratio is 13.92. In terms of profitability, BFLD's ROE is N/A, compared to TOPPY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BFLD is more volatile compared to TOPPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFLD.Check TOPPY's competition here
BFLD vs TONPF Comparison August 2025
BFLD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFLD stands at 43.8K. In comparison, TONPF has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, BFLD is priced at $0.00, while TONPF trades at $30.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFLD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TONPF's P/E ratio is 16.97. In terms of profitability, BFLD's ROE is N/A, compared to TONPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BFLD is more volatile compared to TONPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFLD.Check TONPF's competition here
BFLD vs DNPLY Comparison August 2025
BFLD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFLD stands at 43.8K. In comparison, DNPLY has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BFLD is priced at $0.00, while DNPLY trades at $7.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFLD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DNPLY's P/E ratio is 9.91. In terms of profitability, BFLD's ROE is N/A, compared to DNPLY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BFLD is more volatile compared to DNPLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFLD.Check DNPLY's competition here
BFLD vs INPOY Comparison August 2025
BFLD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFLD stands at 43.8K. In comparison, INPOY has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BFLD is priced at $0.00, while INPOY trades at $7.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFLD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INPOY's P/E ratio is 22.20. In terms of profitability, BFLD's ROE is N/A, compared to INPOY's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, BFLD is more volatile compared to INPOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFLD.Check INPOY's competition here
BFLD vs ELSSF Comparison August 2025
BFLD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFLD stands at 43.8K. In comparison, ELSSF has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BFLD is priced at $0.00, while ELSSF trades at $29.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFLD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELSSF's P/E ratio is 16.96. In terms of profitability, BFLD's ROE is N/A, compared to ELSSF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BFLD is more volatile compared to ELSSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFLD.Check ELSSF's competition here
BFLD vs DNPCF Comparison August 2025
BFLD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFLD stands at 43.8K. In comparison, DNPCF has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BFLD is priced at $0.00, while DNPCF trades at $14.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFLD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DNPCF's P/E ratio is 9.01. In terms of profitability, BFLD's ROE is N/A, compared to DNPCF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BFLD is more volatile compared to DNPCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFLD.Check DNPCF's competition here
BFLD vs CTAGY Comparison August 2025
BFLD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFLD stands at 43.8K. In comparison, CTAGY has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BFLD is priced at $0.00, while CTAGY trades at $14.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFLD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTAGY's P/E ratio is 4.11. In terms of profitability, BFLD's ROE is N/A, compared to CTAGY's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BFLD is more volatile compared to CTAGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFLD.Check CTAGY's competition here
BFLD vs INPOF Comparison August 2025
BFLD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFLD stands at 43.8K. In comparison, INPOF has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, BFLD is priced at $0.00, while INPOF trades at $9.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFLD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INPOF's P/E ratio is 38.42. In terms of profitability, BFLD's ROE is N/A, compared to INPOF's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, BFLD is more volatile compared to INPOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFLD.Check INPOF's competition here
BFLD vs ISFFF Comparison August 2025
BFLD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFLD stands at 43.8K. In comparison, ISFFF has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BFLD is priced at $0.00, while ISFFF trades at $28.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFLD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ISFFF's P/E ratio is 12.96. In terms of profitability, BFLD's ROE is N/A, compared to ISFFF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BFLD is more volatile compared to ISFFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFLD.Check ISFFF's competition here
BFLD vs TLPFF Comparison August 2025
BFLD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFLD stands at 43.8K. In comparison, TLPFF has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BFLD is priced at $0.00, while TLPFF trades at $79.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFLD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TLPFF's P/E ratio is 7.92. In terms of profitability, BFLD's ROE is N/A, compared to TLPFF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BFLD is more volatile compared to TLPFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFLD.Check TLPFF's competition here
BFLD vs TLPFY Comparison August 2025
BFLD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFLD stands at 43.8K. In comparison, TLPFY has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BFLD is priced at $0.00, while TLPFY trades at $39.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFLD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TLPFY's P/E ratio is 7.84. In terms of profitability, BFLD's ROE is N/A, compared to TLPFY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BFLD is more volatile compared to TLPFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFLD.Check TLPFY's competition here
BFLD vs SECCF Comparison August 2025
BFLD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFLD stands at 43.8K. In comparison, SECCF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BFLD is priced at $0.00, while SECCF trades at $2.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFLD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SECCF's P/E ratio is 57.20. In terms of profitability, BFLD's ROE is N/A, compared to SECCF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BFLD is more volatile compared to SECCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFLD.Check SECCF's competition here
BFLD vs SCGPY Comparison August 2025
BFLD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFLD stands at 43.8K. In comparison, SCGPY has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BFLD is priced at $0.00, while SCGPY trades at $2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFLD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCGPY's P/E ratio is 54.80. In terms of profitability, BFLD's ROE is N/A, compared to SCGPY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BFLD is more volatile compared to SCGPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFLD.Check SCGPY's competition here
BFLD vs MITFF Comparison August 2025
BFLD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFLD stands at 43.8K. In comparison, MITFF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BFLD is priced at $0.00, while MITFF trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFLD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MITFF's P/E ratio is 20.01. In terms of profitability, BFLD's ROE is N/A, compared to MITFF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, BFLD is more volatile compared to MITFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFLD.Check MITFF's competition here
BFLD vs MITFY Comparison August 2025
BFLD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFLD stands at 43.8K. In comparison, MITFY has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BFLD is priced at $0.00, while MITFY trades at $7.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFLD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MITFY's P/E ratio is 17.80. In terms of profitability, BFLD's ROE is N/A, compared to MITFY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, BFLD is more volatile compared to MITFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFLD.Check MITFY's competition here
BFLD vs ACENY Comparison August 2025
BFLD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFLD stands at 43.8K. In comparison, ACENY has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BFLD is priced at $0.00, while ACENY trades at $9.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFLD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACENY's P/E ratio is 28.44. In terms of profitability, BFLD's ROE is N/A, compared to ACENY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BFLD is more volatile compared to ACENY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFLD.Check ACENY's competition here
BFLD vs APLUF Comparison August 2025
BFLD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFLD stands at 43.8K. In comparison, APLUF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BFLD is priced at $0.00, while APLUF trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFLD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas APLUF's P/E ratio is 27.27. In terms of profitability, BFLD's ROE is N/A, compared to APLUF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BFLD is more volatile compared to APLUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFLD.Check APLUF's competition here
BFLD vs RELOF Comparison August 2025
BFLD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFLD stands at 43.8K. In comparison, RELOF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BFLD is priced at $0.00, while RELOF trades at $12.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFLD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RELOF's P/E ratio is 6.58. In terms of profitability, BFLD's ROE is N/A, compared to RELOF's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, BFLD is more volatile compared to RELOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFLD.Check RELOF's competition here
BFLD vs ISSDY Comparison August 2025
BFLD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFLD stands at 43.8K. In comparison, ISSDY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BFLD is priced at $0.00, while ISSDY trades at $9.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFLD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ISSDY's P/E ratio is 12.57. In terms of profitability, BFLD's ROE is N/A, compared to ISSDY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BFLD is more volatile compared to ISSDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFLD.Check ISSDY's competition here
BFLD vs TCLCF Comparison August 2025
BFLD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFLD stands at 43.8K. In comparison, TCLCF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BFLD is priced at $0.00, while TCLCF trades at $14.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFLD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TCLCF's P/E ratio is 9.44. In terms of profitability, BFLD's ROE is N/A, compared to TCLCF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BFLD is more volatile compared to TCLCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFLD.Check TCLCF's competition here
BFLD vs TCLAF Comparison August 2025
BFLD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFLD stands at 43.8K. In comparison, TCLAF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BFLD is priced at $0.00, while TCLAF trades at $13.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFLD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TCLAF's P/E ratio is 8.94. In terms of profitability, BFLD's ROE is N/A, compared to TCLAF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BFLD is more volatile compared to TCLAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFLD.Check TCLAF's competition here
BFLD vs IPHLF Comparison August 2025
BFLD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFLD stands at 43.8K. In comparison, IPHLF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BFLD is priced at $0.00, while IPHLF trades at $4.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFLD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IPHLF's P/E ratio is 27.63. In terms of profitability, BFLD's ROE is N/A, compared to IPHLF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BFLD is more volatile compared to IPHLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFLD.Check IPHLF's competition here
BFLD vs JSVGF Comparison August 2025
BFLD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFLD stands at 43.8K. In comparison, JSVGF has a market cap of 850.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BFLD is priced at $0.00, while JSVGF trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFLD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JSVGF's P/E ratio is 117.73. In terms of profitability, BFLD's ROE is N/A, compared to JSVGF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BFLD is more volatile compared to JSVGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFLD.Check JSVGF's competition here
BFLD vs STGXF Comparison August 2025
BFLD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFLD stands at 43.8K. In comparison, STGXF has a market cap of 842.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BFLD is priced at $0.00, while STGXF trades at $6.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFLD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STGXF's P/E ratio is 19.41. In terms of profitability, BFLD's ROE is N/A, compared to STGXF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, BFLD is more volatile compared to STGXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFLD.Check STGXF's competition here
BFLD vs RKSLF Comparison August 2025
BFLD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFLD stands at 43.8K. In comparison, RKSLF has a market cap of 589.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BFLD is priced at $0.00, while RKSLF trades at $10.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFLD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RKSLF's P/E ratio is 67.87. In terms of profitability, BFLD's ROE is N/A, compared to RKSLF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BFLD is more volatile compared to RKSLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFLD.Check RKSLF's competition here
BFLD vs GLCDF Comparison August 2025
BFLD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFLD stands at 43.8K. In comparison, GLCDF has a market cap of 539.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BFLD is priced at $0.00, while GLCDF trades at $18.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFLD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLCDF's P/E ratio is 8.89. In terms of profitability, BFLD's ROE is N/A, compared to GLCDF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BFLD is more volatile compared to GLCDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFLD.Check GLCDF's competition here
BFLD vs GDIFF Comparison August 2025
BFLD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFLD stands at 43.8K. In comparison, GDIFF has a market cap of 536.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BFLD is priced at $0.00, while GDIFF trades at $22.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFLD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GDIFF's P/E ratio is 19.46. In terms of profitability, BFLD's ROE is N/A, compared to GDIFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BFLD is more volatile compared to GDIFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFLD.Check GDIFF's competition here
BFLD vs ITEPF Comparison August 2025
BFLD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFLD stands at 43.8K. In comparison, ITEPF has a market cap of 448.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BFLD is priced at $0.00, while ITEPF trades at $1.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFLD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ITEPF's P/E ratio is -13.68. In terms of profitability, BFLD's ROE is N/A, compared to ITEPF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BFLD is more volatile compared to ITEPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFLD.Check ITEPF's competition here
BFLD vs IRMTF Comparison August 2025
BFLD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFLD stands at 43.8K. In comparison, IRMTF has a market cap of 442.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BFLD is priced at $0.00, while IRMTF trades at $23.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFLD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IRMTF's P/E ratio is 21.74. In terms of profitability, BFLD's ROE is N/A, compared to IRMTF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BFLD is more volatile compared to IRMTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFLD.Check IRMTF's competition here
BFLD vs HZNOF Comparison August 2025
BFLD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFLD stands at 43.8K. In comparison, HZNOF has a market cap of 431.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BFLD is priced at $0.00, while HZNOF trades at $6.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFLD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HZNOF's P/E ratio is 14.74. In terms of profitability, BFLD's ROE is N/A, compared to HZNOF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BFLD is more volatile compared to HZNOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFLD.Check HZNOF's competition here
BFLD vs CLNFF Comparison August 2025
BFLD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFLD stands at 43.8K. In comparison, CLNFF has a market cap of 424.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BFLD is priced at $0.00, while CLNFF trades at $37.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFLD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLNFF's P/E ratio is 133.57. In terms of profitability, BFLD's ROE is N/A, compared to CLNFF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BFLD is more volatile compared to CLNFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFLD.Check CLNFF's competition here
BFLD vs DELRF Comparison August 2025
BFLD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFLD stands at 43.8K. In comparison, DELRF has a market cap of 328M. Regarding current trading prices, BFLD is priced at $0.00, while DELRF trades at $1.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFLD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DELRF's P/E ratio is -15.18. In terms of profitability, BFLD's ROE is N/A, compared to DELRF's ROE of -5.33%. Regarding short-term risk, BFLD is more volatile compared to DELRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFLD.Check DELRF's competition here
BFLD vs DLUEY Comparison August 2025
BFLD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFLD stands at 43.8K. In comparison, DLUEY has a market cap of 327.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BFLD is priced at $0.00, while DLUEY trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFLD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DLUEY's P/E ratio is -15.62. In terms of profitability, BFLD's ROE is N/A, compared to DLUEY's ROE of -5.33%. Regarding short-term risk, BFLD is more volatile compared to DLUEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFLD.Check DLUEY's competition here
BFLD vs KPGHF Comparison August 2025
BFLD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFLD stands at 43.8K. In comparison, KPGHF has a market cap of 323.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BFLD is priced at $0.00, while KPGHF trades at $7.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFLD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KPGHF's P/E ratio is 119.08. In terms of profitability, BFLD's ROE is N/A, compared to KPGHF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BFLD is more volatile compared to KPGHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFLD.Check KPGHF's competition here
BFLD vs KBRLF Comparison August 2025
BFLD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFLD stands at 43.8K. In comparison, KBRLF has a market cap of 323.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BFLD is priced at $0.00, while KBRLF trades at $25.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFLD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KBRLF's P/E ratio is 20.52. In terms of profitability, BFLD's ROE is N/A, compared to KBRLF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BFLD is more volatile compared to KBRLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFLD.Check KBRLF's competition here
BFLD vs VSSPY Comparison August 2025
BFLD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFLD stands at 43.8K. In comparison, VSSPY has a market cap of 314.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BFLD is priced at $0.00, while VSSPY trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFLD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VSSPY's P/E ratio is 5.80. In terms of profitability, BFLD's ROE is N/A, compared to VSSPY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BFLD is more volatile compared to VSSPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFLD.Check VSSPY's competition here
BFLD vs CTAGF Comparison August 2025
BFLD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFLD stands at 43.8K. In comparison, CTAGF has a market cap of 270.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BFLD is priced at $0.00, while CTAGF trades at $2.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFLD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTAGF's P/E ratio is 2.70. In terms of profitability, BFLD's ROE is N/A, compared to CTAGF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BFLD is more volatile compared to CTAGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFLD.Check CTAGF's competition here
BFLD vs ITEGY Comparison August 2025
BFLD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFLD stands at 43.8K. In comparison, ITEGY has a market cap of 244.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BFLD is priced at $0.00, while ITEGY trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFLD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ITEGY's P/E ratio is -7.46. In terms of profitability, BFLD's ROE is N/A, compared to ITEGY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BFLD is more volatile compared to ITEGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFLD.Check ITEGY's competition here
BFLD vs PCRRF Comparison August 2025
BFLD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFLD stands at 43.8K. In comparison, PCRRF has a market cap of 164M. Regarding current trading prices, BFLD is priced at $0.00, while PCRRF trades at $11.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFLD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PCRRF's P/E ratio is 7.08. In terms of profitability, BFLD's ROE is N/A, compared to PCRRF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BFLD is more volatile compared to PCRRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFLD.Check PCRRF's competition here
BFLD vs CERGF Comparison August 2025
BFLD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFLD stands at 43.8K. In comparison, CERGF has a market cap of 138.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BFLD is priced at $0.00, while CERGF trades at $4.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFLD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CERGF's P/E ratio is 63.71. In terms of profitability, BFLD's ROE is N/A, compared to CERGF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BFLD is more volatile compared to CERGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFLD.Check CERGF's competition here
BFLD vs FLNCF Comparison August 2025
BFLD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFLD stands at 43.8K. In comparison, FLNCF has a market cap of 130.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BFLD is priced at $0.00, while FLNCF trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFLD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLNCF's P/E ratio is -29.00. In terms of profitability, BFLD's ROE is N/A, compared to FLNCF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BFLD is more volatile compared to FLNCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFLD.Check FLNCF's competition here
BFLD vs AJISF Comparison August 2025
BFLD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFLD stands at 43.8K. In comparison, AJISF has a market cap of 130.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BFLD is priced at $0.00, while AJISF trades at $15.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFLD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AJISF's P/E ratio is 8.86. In terms of profitability, BFLD's ROE is N/A, compared to AJISF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BFLD is more volatile compared to AJISF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFLD.Check AJISF's competition here
BFLD vs CRKT Comparison August 2025
BFLD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFLD stands at 43.8K. In comparison, CRKT has a market cap of 119.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BFLD is priced at $0.00, while CRKT trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFLD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRKT's P/E ratio is -3.44. In terms of profitability, BFLD's ROE is N/A, compared to CRKT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BFLD is more volatile compared to CRKT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFLD.Check CRKT's competition here
BFLD vs PCOA Comparison August 2025
BFLD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFLD stands at 43.8K. In comparison, PCOA has a market cap of 113.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BFLD is priced at $0.00, while PCOA trades at $150,000.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFLD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PCOA's P/E ratio is 8.08. In terms of profitability, BFLD's ROE is N/A, compared to PCOA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. BFLD has daily volatility of 196.04 and PCOA has daily volatility of N/A.Check PCOA's competition here
BFLD vs ASFH Comparison August 2025
BFLD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFLD stands at 43.8K. In comparison, ASFH has a market cap of 112.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BFLD is priced at $0.00, while ASFH trades at $1.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFLD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASFH's P/E ratio is -137.00. In terms of profitability, BFLD's ROE is N/A, compared to ASFH's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BFLD is more volatile compared to ASFH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFLD.Check ASFH's competition here
BFLD vs WTLLF Comparison August 2025
BFLD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFLD stands at 43.8K. In comparison, WTLLF has a market cap of 81.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BFLD is priced at $0.00, while WTLLF trades at $4.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFLD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WTLLF's P/E ratio is 16.12. In terms of profitability, BFLD's ROE is N/A, compared to WTLLF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BFLD is more volatile compared to WTLLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFLD.Check WTLLF's competition here
BFLD vs PGWFF Comparison August 2025
BFLD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFLD stands at 43.8K. In comparison, PGWFF has a market cap of 78.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BFLD is priced at $0.00, while PGWFF trades at $1.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFLD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PGWFF's P/E ratio is 52.00. In terms of profitability, BFLD's ROE is N/A, compared to PGWFF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BFLD is more volatile compared to PGWFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFLD.Check PGWFF's competition here
BFLD vs RDCPF Comparison August 2025
BFLD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFLD stands at 43.8K. In comparison, RDCPF has a market cap of 63.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BFLD is priced at $0.00, while RDCPF trades at $3.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFLD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RDCPF's P/E ratio is 173.50. In terms of profitability, BFLD's ROE is N/A, compared to RDCPF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BFLD is more volatile compared to RDCPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFLD.Check RDCPF's competition here
BFLD vs DCMDF Comparison August 2025
BFLD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFLD stands at 43.8K. In comparison, DCMDF has a market cap of 61.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BFLD is priced at $0.00, while DCMDF trades at $1.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFLD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DCMDF's P/E ratio is 12.28. In terms of profitability, BFLD's ROE is N/A, compared to DCMDF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BFLD is more volatile compared to DCMDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFLD.Check DCMDF's competition here
BFLD vs SRRPF Comparison August 2025
BFLD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFLD stands at 43.8K. In comparison, SRRPF has a market cap of 54.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BFLD is priced at $0.00, while SRRPF trades at $5.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFLD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SRRPF's P/E ratio is 13.82. In terms of profitability, BFLD's ROE is N/A, compared to SRRPF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BFLD is more volatile compared to SRRPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFLD.Check SRRPF's competition here
BFLD vs ESTTF Comparison August 2025
BFLD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFLD stands at 43.8K. In comparison, ESTTF has a market cap of 44.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BFLD is priced at $0.00, while ESTTF trades at $8.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFLD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ESTTF's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, BFLD's ROE is N/A, compared to ESTTF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BFLD is more volatile compared to ESTTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFLD.Check ESTTF's competition here
BFLD vs UWHGF Comparison August 2025
BFLD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFLD stands at 43.8K. In comparison, UWHGF has a market cap of 32.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BFLD is priced at $0.00, while UWHGF trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFLD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UWHGF's P/E ratio is -8.53. In terms of profitability, BFLD's ROE is N/A, compared to UWHGF's ROE of -3.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BFLD is more volatile compared to UWHGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFLD.Check UWHGF's competition here
BFLD vs FTBGF Comparison August 2025
BFLD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFLD stands at 43.8K. In comparison, FTBGF has a market cap of 29M. Regarding current trading prices, BFLD is priced at $0.00, while FTBGF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFLD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FTBGF's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, BFLD's ROE is N/A, compared to FTBGF's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, BFLD is more volatile compared to FTBGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFLD.Check FTBGF's competition here
BFLD vs SFRX Comparison August 2025
BFLD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFLD stands at 43.8K. In comparison, SFRX has a market cap of 23.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BFLD is priced at $0.00, while SFRX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFLD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SFRX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFLD's ROE is N/A, compared to SFRX's ROE of +1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, BFLD is more volatile compared to SFRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFLD.Check SFRX's competition here
BFLD vs NSYC Comparison August 2025
BFLD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFLD stands at 43.8K. In comparison, NSYC has a market cap of 18.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BFLD is priced at $0.00, while NSYC trades at $424.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFLD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NSYC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFLD's ROE is N/A, compared to NSYC's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BFLD is more volatile compared to NSYC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFLD.Check NSYC's competition here
BFLD vs ADMQ Comparison August 2025
BFLD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFLD stands at 43.8K. In comparison, ADMQ has a market cap of 6.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BFLD is priced at $0.00, while ADMQ trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFLD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADMQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFLD's ROE is N/A, compared to ADMQ's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BFLD is more volatile compared to ADMQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFLD.Check ADMQ's competition here
BFLD vs GPOX Comparison August 2025
BFLD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFLD stands at 43.8K. In comparison, GPOX has a market cap of 5.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BFLD is priced at $0.00, while GPOX trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFLD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GPOX's P/E ratio is -1.40. In terms of profitability, BFLD's ROE is N/A, compared to GPOX's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, BFLD is more volatile compared to GPOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFLD.Check GPOX's competition here
BFLD vs REPO Comparison August 2025
BFLD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFLD stands at 43.8K. In comparison, REPO has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BFLD is priced at $0.00, while REPO trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFLD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas REPO's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, BFLD's ROE is N/A, compared to REPO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BFLD is more volatile compared to REPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFLD.Check REPO's competition here
BFLD vs ELVG Comparison August 2025
BFLD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFLD stands at 43.8K. In comparison, ELVG has a market cap of 4.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BFLD is priced at $0.00, while ELVG trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFLD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELVG's P/E ratio is 0.37. In terms of profitability, BFLD's ROE is N/A, compared to ELVG's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, BFLD is more volatile compared to ELVG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFLD.Check ELVG's competition here
BFLD vs BLIS Comparison August 2025
BFLD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFLD stands at 43.8K. In comparison, BLIS has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BFLD is priced at $0.00, while BLIS trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFLD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BLIS's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, BFLD's ROE is N/A, compared to BLIS's ROE of -2.42%. Regarding short-term risk, BFLD is more volatile compared to BLIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFLD.Check BLIS's competition here
BFLD vs CGRW Comparison August 2025
BFLD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFLD stands at 43.8K. In comparison, CGRW has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BFLD is priced at $0.00, while CGRW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFLD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CGRW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, BFLD's ROE is N/A, compared to CGRW's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BFLD is more volatile compared to CGRW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFLD.Check CGRW's competition here
BFLD vs GNOLF Comparison August 2025
BFLD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFLD stands at 43.8K. In comparison, GNOLF has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, BFLD is priced at $0.00, while GNOLF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFLD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GNOLF's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, BFLD's ROE is N/A, compared to GNOLF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BFLD is more volatile compared to GNOLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFLD.Check GNOLF's competition here
BFLD vs AWAW Comparison August 2025
BFLD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFLD stands at 43.8K. In comparison, AWAW has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BFLD is priced at $0.00, while AWAW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFLD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AWAW's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, BFLD's ROE is N/A, compared to AWAW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BFLD is more volatile compared to AWAW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFLD.Check AWAW's competition here
BFLD vs LMTI Comparison August 2025
BFLD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFLD stands at 43.8K. In comparison, LMTI has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BFLD is priced at $0.00, while LMTI trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFLD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LMTI's P/E ratio is -0.74. In terms of profitability, BFLD's ROE is N/A, compared to LMTI's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BFLD is more volatile compared to LMTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFLD.Check LMTI's competition here
BFLD vs ANMP Comparison August 2025
BFLD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFLD stands at 43.8K. In comparison, ANMP has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BFLD is priced at $0.00, while ANMP trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFLD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ANMP's P/E ratio is 2.35. In terms of profitability, BFLD's ROE is N/A, compared to ANMP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BFLD is more volatile compared to ANMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFLD.Check ANMP's competition here
BFLD vs UNDR Comparison August 2025
BFLD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFLD stands at 43.8K. In comparison, UNDR has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BFLD is priced at $0.00, while UNDR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFLD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UNDR's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, BFLD's ROE is N/A, compared to UNDR's ROE of +1.37%. Regarding short-term risk, BFLD is more volatile compared to UNDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFLD.Check UNDR's competition here
BFLD vs SAYFF Comparison August 2025
BFLD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFLD stands at 43.8K. In comparison, SAYFF has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BFLD is priced at $0.00, while SAYFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFLD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SAYFF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFLD's ROE is N/A, compared to SAYFF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BFLD is more volatile compared to SAYFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFLD.Check SAYFF's competition here
BFLD vs OODH Comparison August 2025
BFLD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFLD stands at 43.8K. In comparison, OODH has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BFLD is priced at $0.00, while OODH trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFLD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OODH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFLD's ROE is N/A, compared to OODH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BFLD is more volatile compared to OODH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFLD.Check OODH's competition here
BFLD vs JFIL Comparison August 2025
BFLD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFLD stands at 43.8K. In comparison, JFIL has a market cap of 753.5K. Regarding current trading prices, BFLD is priced at $0.00, while JFIL trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFLD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JFIL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFLD's ROE is N/A, compared to JFIL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BFLD is more volatile compared to JFIL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFLD.Check JFIL's competition here
BFLD vs HHGI Comparison August 2025
BFLD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFLD stands at 43.8K. In comparison, HHGI has a market cap of 675.4K. Regarding current trading prices, BFLD is priced at $0.00, while HHGI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFLD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HHGI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFLD's ROE is N/A, compared to HHGI's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, BFLD is more volatile compared to HHGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFLD.Check HHGI's competition here
BFLD vs XCPL Comparison August 2025
BFLD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFLD stands at 43.8K. In comparison, XCPL has a market cap of 674.1K. Regarding current trading prices, BFLD is priced at $0.00, while XCPL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFLD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XCPL's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, BFLD's ROE is N/A, compared to XCPL's ROE of +7.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BFLD is more volatile compared to XCPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFLD.Check XCPL's competition here
BFLD vs CLRYF Comparison August 2025
BFLD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFLD stands at 43.8K. In comparison, CLRYF has a market cap of 579.9K. Regarding current trading prices, BFLD is priced at $0.00, while CLRYF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFLD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLRYF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFLD's ROE is N/A, compared to CLRYF's ROE of +1.68%. Regarding short-term risk, BFLD and CLRYF have similar daily volatility (196.04).Check CLRYF's competition here
BFLD vs MTPR Comparison August 2025
BFLD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFLD stands at 43.8K. In comparison, MTPR has a market cap of 408K. Regarding current trading prices, BFLD is priced at $0.00, while MTPR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFLD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MTPR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFLD's ROE is N/A, compared to MTPR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BFLD is less volatile compared to MTPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFLD.Check MTPR's competition here
BFLD vs DTSL Comparison August 2025
BFLD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFLD stands at 43.8K. In comparison, DTSL has a market cap of 391.3K. Regarding current trading prices, BFLD is priced at $0.00, while DTSL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFLD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DTSL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFLD's ROE is N/A, compared to DTSL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BFLD and DTSL have similar daily volatility (196.04).Check DTSL's competition here
BFLD vs WLDPF Comparison August 2025
BFLD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFLD stands at 43.8K. In comparison, WLDPF has a market cap of 301.9K. Regarding current trading prices, BFLD is priced at $0.00, while WLDPF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFLD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WLDPF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, BFLD's ROE is N/A, compared to WLDPF's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, BFLD is more volatile compared to WLDPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFLD.Check WLDPF's competition here
BFLD vs OPMG Comparison August 2025
BFLD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFLD stands at 43.8K. In comparison, OPMG has a market cap of 219.2K. Regarding current trading prices, BFLD is priced at $0.00, while OPMG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFLD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OPMG's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, BFLD's ROE is N/A, compared to OPMG's ROE of +15.86%. Regarding short-term risk, BFLD is more volatile compared to OPMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFLD.Check OPMG's competition here
BFLD vs IJJP Comparison August 2025
BFLD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFLD stands at 43.8K. In comparison, IJJP has a market cap of 192.5K. Regarding current trading prices, BFLD is priced at $0.00, while IJJP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFLD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IJJP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFLD's ROE is N/A, compared to IJJP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BFLD is more volatile compared to IJJP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFLD.Check IJJP's competition here
BFLD vs DPUI Comparison August 2025
BFLD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFLD stands at 43.8K. In comparison, DPUI has a market cap of 181.6K. Regarding current trading prices, BFLD is priced at $0.00, while DPUI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFLD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DPUI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFLD's ROE is N/A, compared to DPUI's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, BFLD is more volatile compared to DPUI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFLD.Check DPUI's competition here
BFLD vs IMJX Comparison August 2025
BFLD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFLD stands at 43.8K. In comparison, IMJX has a market cap of 112.7K. Regarding current trading prices, BFLD is priced at $0.00, while IMJX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFLD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IMJX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFLD's ROE is N/A, compared to IMJX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BFLD is more volatile compared to IMJX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFLD.Check IMJX's competition here
BFLD vs ECOX Comparison August 2025
BFLD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFLD stands at 43.8K. In comparison, ECOX has a market cap of 109.6K. Regarding current trading prices, BFLD is priced at $0.00, while ECOX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFLD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ECOX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFLD's ROE is N/A, compared to ECOX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BFLD and ECOX have similar daily volatility (196.04).Check ECOX's competition here
BFLD vs CTGL Comparison August 2025
BFLD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFLD stands at 43.8K. In comparison, CTGL has a market cap of 104.4K. Regarding current trading prices, BFLD is priced at $0.00, while CTGL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFLD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTGL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFLD's ROE is N/A, compared to CTGL's ROE of +1.35%. Regarding short-term risk, BFLD is more volatile compared to CTGL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFLD.Check CTGL's competition here
BFLD vs NNFC Comparison August 2025
BFLD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFLD stands at 43.8K. In comparison, NNFC has a market cap of 97.8K. Regarding current trading prices, BFLD is priced at $0.00, while NNFC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFLD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NNFC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFLD's ROE is N/A, compared to NNFC's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, BFLD and NNFC have similar daily volatility (196.04).Check NNFC's competition here
BFLD vs PIFR Comparison August 2025
BFLD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFLD stands at 43.8K. In comparison, PIFR has a market cap of 82K. Regarding current trading prices, BFLD is priced at $0.00, while PIFR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFLD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PIFR's P/E ratio is -1.40. In terms of profitability, BFLD's ROE is N/A, compared to PIFR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BFLD is more volatile compared to PIFR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFLD.Check PIFR's competition here
BFLD vs INCC Comparison August 2025
BFLD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFLD stands at 43.8K. In comparison, INCC has a market cap of 81.3K. Regarding current trading prices, BFLD is priced at $0.00, while INCC trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFLD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INCC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFLD's ROE is N/A, compared to INCC's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BFLD is more volatile compared to INCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFLD.Check INCC's competition here
BFLD vs CBMJ Comparison August 2025
BFLD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFLD stands at 43.8K. In comparison, CBMJ has a market cap of 72.4K. Regarding current trading prices, BFLD is priced at $0.00, while CBMJ trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFLD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CBMJ's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, BFLD's ROE is N/A, compared to CBMJ's ROE of -1.58%. Regarding short-term risk, BFLD is more volatile compared to CBMJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFLD.Check CBMJ's competition here
BFLD vs UCPC Comparison August 2025
BFLD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFLD stands at 43.8K. In comparison, UCPC has a market cap of 56.2K. Regarding current trading prices, BFLD is priced at $0.00, while UCPC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFLD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UCPC's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, BFLD's ROE is N/A, compared to UCPC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BFLD and UCPC have similar daily volatility (196.04).Check UCPC's competition here
BFLD vs GFGU Comparison August 2025
BFLD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFLD stands at 43.8K. In comparison, GFGU has a market cap of 48.5K. Regarding current trading prices, BFLD is priced at $0.00, while GFGU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFLD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GFGU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFLD's ROE is N/A, compared to GFGU's ROE of +15.99%. Regarding short-term risk, BFLD is more volatile compared to GFGU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFLD.Check GFGU's competition here
BFLD vs SGLS Comparison August 2025
BFLD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFLD stands at 43.8K. In comparison, SGLS has a market cap of 39.5K. Regarding current trading prices, BFLD is priced at $0.00, while SGLS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFLD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGLS's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, BFLD's ROE is N/A, compared to SGLS's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, BFLD and SGLS have similar daily volatility (196.04).Check SGLS's competition here
BFLD vs AXCG Comparison August 2025
BFLD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFLD stands at 43.8K. In comparison, AXCG has a market cap of 31.5K. Regarding current trading prices, BFLD is priced at $0.00, while AXCG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFLD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AXCG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFLD's ROE is N/A, compared to AXCG's ROE of +1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, BFLD is more volatile compared to AXCG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFLD.Check AXCG's competition here
BFLD vs PVNO Comparison August 2025
BFLD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFLD stands at 43.8K. In comparison, PVNO has a market cap of 26.8K. Regarding current trading prices, BFLD is priced at $0.00, while PVNO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFLD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PVNO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFLD's ROE is N/A, compared to PVNO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BFLD is more volatile compared to PVNO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFLD.Check PVNO's competition here