Brunello Cucinelli S.p.A.
Brunello Cucinelli S.p.A. (BCUCY) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (BCUCY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Luxury Goods Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BCUCY | $10.00 | +5.26% | 6.8B | 43.48 | $0.23 | +1.06% |
| LVMUY | $131.27 | +4.71% | 325.5B | 25.31 | $5.18 | +1.60% |
| LVMHF | $660.10 | +6.64% | 325.3B | 25.25 | $25.95 | +2.27% |
| HESAY | $248.30 | +3.20% | 261.6B | 48.73 | $5.12 | +1.17% |
| HESAF | $2,365.00 | -1.10% | 256.9B | 47.93 | $51.12 | +1.23% |
| CFRUY | $21.05 | +1.89% | 123.4B | 27.27 | $0.77 | +0.84% |
| CHDRY | $154.88 | +0.00% | 111.7B | 20.88 | $7.41 | +2.20% |
| CFRHF | $207.51 | +3.39% | 108.7B | 26.40 | $7.71 | +1.81% |
| CHDRF | $590.00 | +0.00% | 106.4B | 19.91 | $29.63 | +2.68% |
| PPRUY | $33.75 | +3.18% | 40.2B | -1094.00 | -$0.03 | +1.62% |
Stock Comparison
BCUCY vs LVMUY Comparison February 2026
BCUCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCUCY stands at 6.8B. In comparison, LVMUY has a market cap of 325.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BCUCY is priced at $10.00, while LVMUY trades at $131.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCUCY currently has a P/E ratio of 43.48, whereas LVMUY's P/E ratio is 25.31. In terms of profitability, BCUCY's ROE is +0.27%, compared to LVMUY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BCUCY is less volatile compared to LVMUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCUCY.Check LVMUY's competition here
BCUCY vs LVMHF Comparison February 2026
BCUCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCUCY stands at 6.8B. In comparison, LVMHF has a market cap of 325.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BCUCY is priced at $10.00, while LVMHF trades at $660.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCUCY currently has a P/E ratio of 43.48, whereas LVMHF's P/E ratio is 25.25. In terms of profitability, BCUCY's ROE is +0.27%, compared to LVMHF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BCUCY is less volatile compared to LVMHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCUCY.Check LVMHF's competition here
BCUCY vs HESAY Comparison February 2026
BCUCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCUCY stands at 6.8B. In comparison, HESAY has a market cap of 261.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BCUCY is priced at $10.00, while HESAY trades at $248.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCUCY currently has a P/E ratio of 43.48, whereas HESAY's P/E ratio is 48.73. In terms of profitability, BCUCY's ROE is +0.27%, compared to HESAY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, BCUCY is less volatile compared to HESAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCUCY.Check HESAY's competition here
BCUCY vs HESAF Comparison February 2026
BCUCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCUCY stands at 6.8B. In comparison, HESAF has a market cap of 256.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BCUCY is priced at $10.00, while HESAF trades at $2,365.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCUCY currently has a P/E ratio of 43.48, whereas HESAF's P/E ratio is 47.93. In terms of profitability, BCUCY's ROE is +0.27%, compared to HESAF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, BCUCY is less volatile compared to HESAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCUCY.Check HESAF's competition here
BCUCY vs CFRUY Comparison February 2026
BCUCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCUCY stands at 6.8B. In comparison, CFRUY has a market cap of 123.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BCUCY is priced at $10.00, while CFRUY trades at $21.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCUCY currently has a P/E ratio of 43.48, whereas CFRUY's P/E ratio is 27.27. In terms of profitability, BCUCY's ROE is +0.27%, compared to CFRUY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BCUCY is less volatile compared to CFRUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCUCY.Check CFRUY's competition here
BCUCY vs CHDRY Comparison February 2026
BCUCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCUCY stands at 6.8B. In comparison, CHDRY has a market cap of 111.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BCUCY is priced at $10.00, while CHDRY trades at $154.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCUCY currently has a P/E ratio of 43.48, whereas CHDRY's P/E ratio is 20.88. In terms of profitability, BCUCY's ROE is +0.27%, compared to CHDRY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BCUCY is more volatile compared to CHDRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCUCY.Check CHDRY's competition here
BCUCY vs CFRHF Comparison February 2026
BCUCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCUCY stands at 6.8B. In comparison, CFRHF has a market cap of 108.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BCUCY is priced at $10.00, while CFRHF trades at $207.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCUCY currently has a P/E ratio of 43.48, whereas CFRHF's P/E ratio is 26.40. In terms of profitability, BCUCY's ROE is +0.27%, compared to CFRHF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BCUCY is less volatile compared to CFRHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCUCY.Check CFRHF's competition here
BCUCY vs CHDRF Comparison February 2026
BCUCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCUCY stands at 6.8B. In comparison, CHDRF has a market cap of 106.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BCUCY is priced at $10.00, while CHDRF trades at $590.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCUCY currently has a P/E ratio of 43.48, whereas CHDRF's P/E ratio is 19.91. In terms of profitability, BCUCY's ROE is +0.27%, compared to CHDRF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BCUCY is more volatile compared to CHDRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCUCY.Check CHDRF's competition here
BCUCY vs PPRUY Comparison February 2026
BCUCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCUCY stands at 6.8B. In comparison, PPRUY has a market cap of 40.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BCUCY is priced at $10.00, while PPRUY trades at $33.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCUCY currently has a P/E ratio of 43.48, whereas PPRUY's P/E ratio is -1094.00. In terms of profitability, BCUCY's ROE is +0.27%, compared to PPRUY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BCUCY is less volatile compared to PPRUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCUCY.Check PPRUY's competition here
BCUCY vs PPRUF Comparison February 2026
BCUCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCUCY stands at 6.8B. In comparison, PPRUF has a market cap of 38.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BCUCY is priced at $10.00, while PPRUF trades at $337.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCUCY currently has a P/E ratio of 43.48, whereas PPRUF's P/E ratio is -1172.74. In terms of profitability, BCUCY's ROE is +0.27%, compared to PPRUF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCUCY is more volatile compared to PPRUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCUCY.Check PPRUF's competition here
BCUCY vs CJEWF Comparison February 2026
BCUCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCUCY stands at 6.8B. In comparison, CJEWF has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BCUCY is priced at $10.00, while CJEWF trades at $1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCUCY currently has a P/E ratio of 43.48, whereas CJEWF's P/E ratio is 23.75. In terms of profitability, BCUCY's ROE is +0.27%, compared to CJEWF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BCUCY is more volatile compared to CJEWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCUCY.Check CJEWF's competition here
BCUCY vs CJEWY Comparison February 2026
BCUCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCUCY stands at 6.8B. In comparison, CJEWY has a market cap of 18.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BCUCY is priced at $10.00, while CJEWY trades at $18.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCUCY currently has a P/E ratio of 43.48, whereas CJEWY's P/E ratio is 24.41. In terms of profitability, BCUCY's ROE is +0.27%, compared to CJEWY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BCUCY is more volatile compared to CJEWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCUCY.Check CJEWY's competition here
BCUCY vs PRDSY Comparison February 2026
BCUCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCUCY stands at 6.8B. In comparison, PRDSY has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BCUCY is priced at $10.00, while PRDSY trades at $11.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCUCY currently has a P/E ratio of 43.48, whereas PRDSY's P/E ratio is 13.69. In terms of profitability, BCUCY's ROE is +0.27%, compared to PRDSY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BCUCY is less volatile compared to PRDSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCUCY.Check PRDSY's competition here
BCUCY vs SWGAY Comparison February 2026
BCUCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCUCY stands at 6.8B. In comparison, SWGAY has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BCUCY is priced at $10.00, while SWGAY trades at $12.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCUCY currently has a P/E ratio of 43.48, whereas SWGAY's P/E ratio is 159.38. In terms of profitability, BCUCY's ROE is +0.27%, compared to SWGAY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCUCY is less volatile compared to SWGAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCUCY.Check SWGAY's competition here
BCUCY vs SWGNF Comparison February 2026
BCUCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCUCY stands at 6.8B. In comparison, SWGNF has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BCUCY is priced at $10.00, while SWGNF trades at $49.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCUCY currently has a P/E ratio of 43.48, whereas SWGNF's P/E ratio is 158.06. In terms of profitability, BCUCY's ROE is +0.27%, compared to SWGNF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCUCY is more volatile compared to SWGNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCUCY.Check SWGNF's competition here
BCUCY vs PRDSF Comparison February 2026
BCUCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCUCY stands at 6.8B. In comparison, PRDSF has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BCUCY is priced at $10.00, while PRDSF trades at $5.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCUCY currently has a P/E ratio of 43.48, whereas PRDSF's P/E ratio is 12.85. In terms of profitability, BCUCY's ROE is +0.27%, compared to PRDSF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BCUCY is more volatile compared to PRDSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCUCY.Check PRDSF's competition here
BCUCY vs SWGAF Comparison February 2026
BCUCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCUCY stands at 6.8B. In comparison, SWGAF has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BCUCY is priced at $10.00, while SWGAF trades at $211.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCUCY currently has a P/E ratio of 43.48, whereas SWGAF's P/E ratio is 139.21. In terms of profitability, BCUCY's ROE is +0.27%, compared to SWGAF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCUCY is more volatile compared to SWGAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCUCY.Check SWGAF's competition here
BCUCY vs PNDZF Comparison February 2026
BCUCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCUCY stands at 6.8B. In comparison, PNDZF has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BCUCY is priced at $10.00, while PNDZF trades at $85.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCUCY currently has a P/E ratio of 43.48, whereas PNDZF's P/E ratio is 7.96. In terms of profitability, BCUCY's ROE is +0.27%, compared to PNDZF's ROE of +1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, BCUCY is more volatile compared to PNDZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCUCY.Check PNDZF's competition here
BCUCY vs BBRYF Comparison February 2026
BCUCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCUCY stands at 6.8B. In comparison, BBRYF has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BCUCY is priced at $10.00, while BBRYF trades at $17.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCUCY currently has a P/E ratio of 43.48, whereas BBRYF's P/E ratio is -177.70. In terms of profitability, BCUCY's ROE is +0.27%, compared to BBRYF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BCUCY is more volatile compared to BBRYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCUCY.Check BBRYF's competition here
BCUCY vs BURBY Comparison February 2026
BCUCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCUCY stands at 6.8B. In comparison, BURBY has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BCUCY is priced at $10.00, while BURBY trades at $16.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCUCY currently has a P/E ratio of 43.48, whereas BURBY's P/E ratio is -163.85. In terms of profitability, BCUCY's ROE is +0.27%, compared to BURBY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BCUCY is less volatile compared to BURBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCUCY.Check BURBY's competition here
BCUCY vs LKFLF Comparison February 2026
BCUCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCUCY stands at 6.8B. In comparison, LKFLF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BCUCY is priced at $10.00, while LKFLF trades at $4.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCUCY currently has a P/E ratio of 43.48, whereas LKFLF's P/E ratio is 14.96. In terms of profitability, BCUCY's ROE is +0.27%, compared to LKFLF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BCUCY is more volatile compared to LKFLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCUCY.Check LKFLF's competition here
BCUCY vs PANDY Comparison February 2026
BCUCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCUCY stands at 6.8B. In comparison, PANDY has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BCUCY is priced at $10.00, while PANDY trades at $21.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCUCY currently has a P/E ratio of 43.48, whereas PANDY's P/E ratio is 10.75. In terms of profitability, BCUCY's ROE is +0.27%, compared to PANDY's ROE of +0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, BCUCY is less volatile compared to PANDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCUCY.Check PANDY's competition here
BCUCY vs SFRGF Comparison February 2026
BCUCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCUCY stands at 6.8B. In comparison, SFRGF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BCUCY is priced at $10.00, while SFRGF trades at $10.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCUCY currently has a P/E ratio of 43.48, whereas SFRGF's P/E ratio is -10.91. In terms of profitability, BCUCY's ROE is +0.27%, compared to SFRGF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BCUCY is more volatile compared to SFRGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCUCY.Check SFRGF's competition here
BCUCY vs WOSGF Comparison February 2026
BCUCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCUCY stands at 6.8B. In comparison, WOSGF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BCUCY is priced at $10.00, while WOSGF trades at $6.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCUCY currently has a P/E ratio of 43.48, whereas WOSGF's P/E ratio is 16.75. In terms of profitability, BCUCY's ROE is +0.27%, compared to WOSGF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BCUCY is more volatile compared to WOSGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCUCY.Check WOSGF's competition here
BCUCY vs SFRGY Comparison February 2026
BCUCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCUCY stands at 6.8B. In comparison, SFRGY has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BCUCY is priced at $10.00, while SFRGY trades at $4.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCUCY currently has a P/E ratio of 43.48, whereas SFRGY's P/E ratio is -8.26. In terms of profitability, BCUCY's ROE is +0.27%, compared to SFRGY's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BCUCY is less volatile compared to SFRGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCUCY.Check SFRGY's competition here
BCUCY vs CHOWF Comparison February 2026
BCUCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCUCY stands at 6.8B. In comparison, CHOWF has a market cap of 375.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BCUCY is priced at $10.00, while CHOWF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCUCY currently has a P/E ratio of 43.48, whereas CHOWF's P/E ratio is 2.43. In terms of profitability, BCUCY's ROE is +0.27%, compared to CHOWF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BCUCY is more volatile compared to CHOWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCUCY.Check CHOWF's competition here
BCUCY vs EPRJF Comparison February 2026
BCUCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCUCY stands at 6.8B. In comparison, EPRJF has a market cap of 307.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BCUCY is priced at $10.00, while EPRJF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCUCY currently has a P/E ratio of 43.48, whereas EPRJF's P/E ratio is 4.24. In terms of profitability, BCUCY's ROE is +0.27%, compared to EPRJF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BCUCY is more volatile compared to EPRJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCUCY.Check EPRJF's competition here
BCUCY vs DCOHF Comparison February 2026
BCUCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCUCY stands at 6.8B. In comparison, DCOHF has a market cap of 305M. Regarding current trading prices, BCUCY is priced at $10.00, while DCOHF trades at $0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCUCY currently has a P/E ratio of 43.48, whereas DCOHF's P/E ratio is 11.29. In terms of profitability, BCUCY's ROE is +0.27%, compared to DCOHF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BCUCY is more volatile compared to DCOHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCUCY.Check DCOHF's competition here
BCUCY vs ZAPNF Comparison February 2026
BCUCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCUCY stands at 6.8B. In comparison, ZAPNF has a market cap of 254.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BCUCY is priced at $10.00, while ZAPNF trades at $39.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCUCY currently has a P/E ratio of 43.48, whereas ZAPNF's P/E ratio is 25.27. In terms of profitability, BCUCY's ROE is +0.27%, compared to ZAPNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BCUCY is more volatile compared to ZAPNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCUCY.Check ZAPNF's competition here
BCUCY vs TSSJF Comparison February 2026
BCUCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCUCY stands at 6.8B. In comparison, TSSJF has a market cap of 239.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BCUCY is priced at $10.00, while TSSJF trades at $15.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCUCY currently has a P/E ratio of 43.48, whereas TSSJF's P/E ratio is 21.89. In terms of profitability, BCUCY's ROE is +0.27%, compared to TSSJF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BCUCY is more volatile compared to TSSJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCUCY.Check TSSJF's competition here
BCUCY vs ORWHF Comparison February 2026
BCUCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCUCY stands at 6.8B. In comparison, ORWHF has a market cap of 214.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BCUCY is priced at $10.00, while ORWHF trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCUCY currently has a P/E ratio of 43.48, whereas ORWHF's P/E ratio is 8.82. In terms of profitability, BCUCY's ROE is +0.27%, compared to ORWHF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BCUCY is more volatile compared to ORWHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCUCY.Check ORWHF's competition here
BCUCY vs FLLIY Comparison February 2026
BCUCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCUCY stands at 6.8B. In comparison, FLLIY has a market cap of 139.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BCUCY is priced at $10.00, while FLLIY trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCUCY currently has a P/E ratio of 43.48, whereas FLLIY's P/E ratio is -0.54. In terms of profitability, BCUCY's ROE is +0.27%, compared to FLLIY's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, BCUCY is less volatile compared to FLLIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCUCY.Check FLLIY's competition here
BCUCY vs CEBTF Comparison February 2026
BCUCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCUCY stands at 6.8B. In comparison, CEBTF has a market cap of 91.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BCUCY is priced at $10.00, while CEBTF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCUCY currently has a P/E ratio of 43.48, whereas CEBTF's P/E ratio is -2.10. In terms of profitability, BCUCY's ROE is +0.27%, compared to CEBTF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BCUCY is more volatile compared to CEBTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCUCY.Check CEBTF's competition here
BCUCY vs HENGF Comparison February 2026
BCUCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCUCY stands at 6.8B. In comparison, HENGF has a market cap of 88.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BCUCY is priced at $10.00, while HENGF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCUCY currently has a P/E ratio of 43.48, whereas HENGF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCUCY's ROE is +0.27%, compared to HENGF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BCUCY is more volatile compared to HENGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCUCY.Check HENGF's competition here
BCUCY vs CTTLF Comparison February 2026
BCUCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCUCY stands at 6.8B. In comparison, CTTLF has a market cap of 85.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BCUCY is priced at $10.00, while CTTLF trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCUCY currently has a P/E ratio of 43.48, whereas CTTLF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCUCY's ROE is +0.27%, compared to CTTLF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCUCY is more volatile compared to CTTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCUCY.Check CTTLF's competition here
BCUCY vs HENGY Comparison February 2026
BCUCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCUCY stands at 6.8B. In comparison, HENGY has a market cap of 65.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BCUCY is priced at $10.00, while HENGY trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCUCY currently has a P/E ratio of 43.48, whereas HENGY's P/E ratio is -7.40. In terms of profitability, BCUCY's ROE is +0.27%, compared to HENGY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BCUCY is more volatile compared to HENGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCUCY.Check HENGY's competition here
BCUCY vs MNNGF Comparison February 2026
BCUCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCUCY stands at 6.8B. In comparison, MNNGF has a market cap of 49.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BCUCY is priced at $10.00, while MNNGF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCUCY currently has a P/E ratio of 43.48, whereas MNNGF's P/E ratio is -6.40. In terms of profitability, BCUCY's ROE is +0.27%, compared to MNNGF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BCUCY is more volatile compared to MNNGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCUCY.Check MNNGF's competition here
BCUCY vs MENEF Comparison February 2026
BCUCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCUCY stands at 6.8B. In comparison, MENEF has a market cap of 34.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BCUCY is priced at $10.00, while MENEF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCUCY currently has a P/E ratio of 43.48, whereas MENEF's P/E ratio is -13.26. In terms of profitability, BCUCY's ROE is +0.27%, compared to MENEF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BCUCY is more volatile compared to MENEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCUCY.Check MENEF's competition here
BCUCY vs MDNL Comparison February 2026
BCUCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCUCY stands at 6.8B. In comparison, MDNL has a market cap of 10.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BCUCY is priced at $10.00, while MDNL trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCUCY currently has a P/E ratio of 43.48, whereas MDNL's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, BCUCY's ROE is +0.27%, compared to MDNL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BCUCY is more volatile compared to MDNL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCUCY.Check MDNL's competition here
BCUCY vs MAJJ Comparison February 2026
BCUCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCUCY stands at 6.8B. In comparison, MAJJ has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BCUCY is priced at $10.00, while MAJJ trades at $1,800.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCUCY currently has a P/E ratio of 43.48, whereas MAJJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCUCY's ROE is +0.27%, compared to MAJJ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BCUCY is more volatile compared to MAJJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCUCY.Check MAJJ's competition here
BCUCY vs BANI Comparison February 2026
BCUCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCUCY stands at 6.8B. In comparison, BANI has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BCUCY is priced at $10.00, while BANI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCUCY currently has a P/E ratio of 43.48, whereas BANI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCUCY's ROE is +0.27%, compared to BANI's ROE of -1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BCUCY is more volatile compared to BANI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCUCY.Check BANI's competition here
BCUCY vs EATR Comparison February 2026
BCUCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCUCY stands at 6.8B. In comparison, EATR has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BCUCY is priced at $10.00, while EATR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCUCY currently has a P/E ratio of 43.48, whereas EATR's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, BCUCY's ROE is +0.27%, compared to EATR's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCUCY is less volatile compared to EATR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCUCY.Check EATR's competition here
BCUCY vs BRGO Comparison February 2026
BCUCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCUCY stands at 6.8B. In comparison, BRGO has a market cap of 289.8K. Regarding current trading prices, BCUCY is priced at $10.00, while BRGO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCUCY currently has a P/E ratio of 43.48, whereas BRGO's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, BCUCY's ROE is +0.27%, compared to BRGO's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, BCUCY is more volatile compared to BRGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCUCY.Check BRGO's competition here
BCUCY vs MASN Comparison February 2026
BCUCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCUCY stands at 6.8B. In comparison, MASN has a market cap of 245.3K. Regarding current trading prices, BCUCY is priced at $10.00, while MASN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCUCY currently has a P/E ratio of 43.48, whereas MASN's P/E ratio is 0.09. In terms of profitability, BCUCY's ROE is +0.27%, compared to MASN's ROE of +11.81%. Regarding short-term risk, BCUCY is less volatile compared to MASN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCUCY.Check MASN's competition here
BCUCY vs BRGOD Comparison February 2026
BCUCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCUCY stands at 6.8B. In comparison, BRGOD has a market cap of 78.1K. Regarding current trading prices, BCUCY is priced at $10.00, while BRGOD trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCUCY currently has a P/E ratio of 43.48, whereas BRGOD's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, BCUCY's ROE is +0.27%, compared to BRGOD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BCUCY is less volatile compared to BRGOD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCUCY.Check BRGOD's competition here
BCUCY vs SSOK Comparison February 2026
BCUCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCUCY stands at 6.8B. In comparison, SSOK has a market cap of 69K. Regarding current trading prices, BCUCY is priced at $10.00, while SSOK trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCUCY currently has a P/E ratio of 43.48, whereas SSOK's P/E ratio is 0.08. In terms of profitability, BCUCY's ROE is +0.27%, compared to SSOK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCUCY is less volatile compared to SSOK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCUCY.Check SSOK's competition here
BCUCY vs AVEW Comparison February 2026
BCUCY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCUCY stands at 6.8B. In comparison, AVEW has a market cap of 50K. Regarding current trading prices, BCUCY is priced at $10.00, while AVEW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCUCY currently has a P/E ratio of 43.48, whereas AVEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCUCY's ROE is +0.27%, compared to AVEW's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, BCUCY is more volatile compared to AVEW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCUCY.Check AVEW's competition here