Banco Comercial Português, S.A.

BCP.LS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BCP.LS stands at 9.10B. In comparison, BNP.PA has a market cap of 89.29B. Regarding current trading prices, BCP.LS is priced at $0.60, while BNP.PA trades at $79.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BCP.LS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.04, whereas BNP.PA's P/E ratio is 8.33. In terms of profitability, BCP.LS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BNP.PA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BCP.LS is less volatile compared to BNP.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCP.LS.

BCP.LS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BCP.LS stands at 9.10B. In comparison, ACA.PA has a market cap of 51.16B. Regarding current trading prices, BCP.LS is priced at $0.60, while ACA.PA trades at $17.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BCP.LS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.04, whereas ACA.PA's P/E ratio is 8.06. In terms of profitability, BCP.LS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ACA.PA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BCP.LS is more volatile compared to ACA.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCP.LS.

BCP.LS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BCP.LS stands at 9.10B. In comparison, GLE.PA has a market cap of 33.43B. Regarding current trading prices, BCP.LS is priced at $0.60, while GLE.PA trades at $47.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BCP.LS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.04, whereas GLE.PA's P/E ratio is 8.58. In terms of profitability, BCP.LS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GLE.PA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BCP.LS is less volatile compared to GLE.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCP.LS.

BCP.LS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BCP.LS stands at 9.10B. In comparison, KBC.BR has a market cap of 32.88B. Regarding current trading prices, BCP.LS is priced at $0.60, while KBC.BR trades at $82.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BCP.LS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.04, whereas KBC.BR's P/E ratio is 9.95. In terms of profitability, BCP.LS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KBC.BR's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BCP.LS is more volatile compared to KBC.BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCP.LS.

BCP.LS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BCP.LS stands at 9.10B. In comparison, XBBDC.MC has a market cap of 24.90B. Regarding current trading prices, BCP.LS is priced at $0.60, while XBBDC.MC trades at $2.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BCP.LS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.04, whereas XBBDC.MC's P/E ratio is 10.17. In terms of profitability, BCP.LS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to XBBDC.MC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BCP.LS is less volatile compared to XBBDC.MC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCP.LS.

BCP.LS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BCP.LS stands at 9.10B. In comparison, A5G.IR has a market cap of 15.27B. Regarding current trading prices, BCP.LS is priced at $0.60, while A5G.IR trades at $6.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BCP.LS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.04, whereas A5G.IR's P/E ratio is 7.05. In terms of profitability, BCP.LS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to A5G.IR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BCP.LS is less volatile compared to A5G.IR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCP.LS.

BCP.LS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BCP.LS stands at 9.10B. In comparison, BIRG.IR has a market cap of 11.33B. Regarding current trading prices, BCP.LS is priced at $0.60, while BIRG.IR trades at $11.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BCP.LS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.04, whereas BIRG.IR's P/E ratio is 8.10. In terms of profitability, BCP.LS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BIRG.IR's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BCP.LS is less volatile compared to BIRG.IR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCP.LS.

BCP.LS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BCP.LS stands at 9.10B. In comparison, VLK.AS has a market cap of 2.40B. Regarding current trading prices, BCP.LS is priced at $0.60, while VLK.AS trades at $56.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BCP.LS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.04, whereas VLK.AS's P/E ratio is 18.28. In terms of profitability, BCP.LS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VLK.AS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BCP.LS is more volatile compared to VLK.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCP.LS.

BCP.LS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BCP.LS stands at 9.10B. In comparison, IL0A.IR has a market cap of 1.28B. Regarding current trading prices, BCP.LS is priced at $0.60, while IL0A.IR trades at $2.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BCP.LS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.04, whereas IL0A.IR's P/E ratio is 5.34. In terms of profitability, BCP.LS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to IL0A.IR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BCP.LS is less volatile compared to IL0A.IR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCP.LS.

BCP.LS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BCP.LS stands at 9.10B. In comparison, PTSB.IR has a market cap of 948.29M. Regarding current trading prices, BCP.LS is priced at $0.60, while PTSB.IR trades at $1.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BCP.LS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.04, whereas PTSB.IR's P/E ratio is 7.91. In terms of profitability, BCP.LS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PTSB.IR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BCP.LS is less volatile compared to PTSB.IR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCP.LS.

BCP.LS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BCP.LS stands at 9.10B. In comparison, MLCFM.PA has a market cap of 716.25M. Regarding current trading prices, BCP.LS is priced at $0.60, while MLCFM.PA trades at $1,250.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BCP.LS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.04, whereas MLCFM.PA's P/E ratio is 12.06. In terms of profitability, BCP.LS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MLCFM.PA's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BCP.LS is more volatile compared to MLCFM.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCP.LS.

BCP.LS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BCP.LS stands at 9.10B. In comparison, CAF.PA has a market cap of 560.16M. Regarding current trading prices, BCP.LS is priced at $0.60, while CAF.PA trades at $69.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BCP.LS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.04, whereas CAF.PA's P/E ratio is 10.11. In terms of profitability, BCP.LS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CAF.PA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BCP.LS is more volatile compared to CAF.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCP.LS.

BCP.LS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BCP.LS stands at 9.10B. In comparison, CRBP2.PA has a market cap of 349.69M. Regarding current trading prices, BCP.LS is priced at $0.60, while CRBP2.PA trades at $21.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BCP.LS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.04, whereas CRBP2.PA's P/E ratio is 5.86. In terms of profitability, BCP.LS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CRBP2.PA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BCP.LS is more volatile compared to CRBP2.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCP.LS.

BCP.LS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BCP.LS stands at 9.10B. In comparison, CNF.PA has a market cap of 260.55M. Regarding current trading prices, BCP.LS is priced at $0.60, while CNF.PA trades at $16.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BCP.LS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.04, whereas CNF.PA's P/E ratio is 4.65. In terms of profitability, BCP.LS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CNF.PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BCP.LS is more volatile compared to CNF.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCP.LS.

BCP.LS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BCP.LS stands at 9.10B. In comparison, CIV.PA has a market cap of 178.95M. Regarding current trading prices, BCP.LS is priced at $0.60, while CIV.PA trades at $79.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BCP.LS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.04, whereas CIV.PA's P/E ratio is 7.48. In terms of profitability, BCP.LS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CIV.PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BCP.LS is more volatile compared to CIV.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCP.LS.

BCP.LS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BCP.LS stands at 9.10B. In comparison, BNB.BR has a market cap of 145.60M. Regarding current trading prices, BCP.LS is priced at $0.60, while BNB.BR trades at $364.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BCP.LS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.04, whereas BNB.BR's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, BCP.LS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BNB.BR's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BCP.LS is less volatile compared to BNB.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCP.LS.

BCP.LS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BCP.LS stands at 9.10B. In comparison, CRAV.PA has a market cap of 121.12M. Regarding current trading prices, BCP.LS is priced at $0.60, while CRAV.PA trades at $99.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BCP.LS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.04, whereas CRAV.PA's P/E ratio is 8.63. In terms of profitability, BCP.LS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CRAV.PA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BCP.LS is more volatile compared to CRAV.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCP.LS.

BCP.LS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BCP.LS stands at 9.10B. In comparison, CAT31.PA has a market cap of 119.29M. Regarding current trading prices, BCP.LS is priced at $0.60, while CAT31.PA trades at $83.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BCP.LS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.04, whereas CAT31.PA's P/E ratio is 5.71. In terms of profitability, BCP.LS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CAT31.PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BCP.LS is more volatile compared to CAT31.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCP.LS.

BCP.LS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BCP.LS stands at 9.10B. In comparison, CMO.PA has a market cap of 119.11M. Regarding current trading prices, BCP.LS is priced at $0.60, while CMO.PA trades at $76.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BCP.LS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.04, whereas CMO.PA's P/E ratio is 5.82. In terms of profitability, BCP.LS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CMO.PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BCP.LS is more volatile compared to CMO.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCP.LS.

BCP.LS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BCP.LS stands at 9.10B. In comparison, CCN.PA has a market cap of 104.05M. Regarding current trading prices, BCP.LS is priced at $0.60, while CCN.PA trades at $99.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BCP.LS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.04, whereas CCN.PA's P/E ratio is 7.63. In terms of profitability, BCP.LS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CCN.PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BCP.LS is more volatile compared to CCN.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCP.LS.

BCP.LS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BCP.LS stands at 9.10B. In comparison, CRLA.PA has a market cap of 103.80M. Regarding current trading prices, BCP.LS is priced at $0.60, while CRLA.PA trades at $58.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BCP.LS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.04, whereas CRLA.PA's P/E ratio is 6.34. In terms of profitability, BCP.LS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CRLA.PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BCP.LS is more volatile compared to CRLA.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCP.LS.

BCP.LS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BCP.LS stands at 9.10B. In comparison, CRSU.PA has a market cap of 90.34M. Regarding current trading prices, BCP.LS is priced at $0.60, while CRSU.PA trades at $143.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BCP.LS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.04, whereas CRSU.PA's P/E ratio is 6.58. In terms of profitability, BCP.LS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CRSU.PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BCP.LS is more volatile compared to CRSU.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCP.LS.

BCP.LS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BCP.LS stands at 9.10B. In comparison, CRTO.PA has a market cap of 87.42M. Regarding current trading prices, BCP.LS is priced at $0.60, while CRTO.PA trades at $85.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BCP.LS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.04, whereas CRTO.PA's P/E ratio is 8.03. In terms of profitability, BCP.LS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CRTO.PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BCP.LS is more volatile compared to CRTO.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCP.LS.

BCP.LS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BCP.LS stands at 9.10B. In comparison, CRLO.PA has a market cap of 70.46M. Regarding current trading prices, BCP.LS is priced at $0.60, while CRLO.PA trades at $70.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BCP.LS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.04, whereas CRLO.PA's P/E ratio is 7.37. In terms of profitability, BCP.LS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CRLO.PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BCP.LS is more volatile compared to CRLO.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCP.LS.

BCP.LS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BCP.LS stands at 9.10B. In comparison, CRAP.PA has a market cap of 60.12M. Regarding current trading prices, BCP.LS is priced at $0.60, while CRAP.PA trades at $87.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BCP.LS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.04, whereas CRAP.PA's P/E ratio is 4.85. In terms of profitability, BCP.LS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CRAP.PA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BCP.LS is more volatile compared to CRAP.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCP.LS.

BCP.LS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BCP.LS stands at 9.10B. In comparison, MLGRC.PA has a market cap of 36.22M. Regarding current trading prices, BCP.LS is priced at $0.60, while MLGRC.PA trades at $15.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BCP.LS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.04, whereas MLGRC.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCP.LS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MLGRC.PA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BCP.LS is more volatile compared to MLGRC.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCP.LS.