Banco Comercial Português, S.A.
Banco Comercial Português, S.A. (BCP.LS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (BCP.LS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Banks - Regional Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BCP.LS | €0.87 | +6.78% | 12.3B | 11.89 | €0.07 | +3.61% |
| BNP.PA | €84.91 | +4.93% | 89.2B | 7.87 | €10.29 | +9.11% |
| ACA.PA | €16.52 | +4.23% | 48.2B | 7.31 | €2.18 | +6.91% |
| GLE.PA | €65.70 | +6.79% | 45.1B | 9.08 | €6.80 | +2.75% |
| KBC.BR | €108.95 | +5.16% | 41.5B | 12.03 | €8.69 | +2.78% |
| XBBDC.MC | €3.12 | +0.65% | 33B | 8.91 | €0.35 | +0.98% |
| A5G.IR | €8.95 | +3.17% | 19.2B | 9.69 | €0.93 | +5.22% |
| BIRG.IR | €15.45 | +1.51% | 14.7B | 13.42 | €1.15 | +3.43% |
| VLK.AS | €59.00 | +3.69% | 2.4B | 16.37 | €3.47 | +7.31% |
| PTSB.IR | €2.96 | +2.42% | 1.6B | 22.46 | €0.13 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
BCP.LS vs BNP.PA Comparison April 2026
BCP.LS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCP.LS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, BNP.PA has a market cap of 89.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BCP.LS is priced at €0.87, while BNP.PA trades at €84.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCP.LS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.89, whereas BNP.PA's P/E ratio is 7.87. In terms of profitability, BCP.LS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BNP.PA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BCP.LS is less volatile compared to BNP.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCP.LS.Check BNP.PA's competition here
BCP.LS vs ACA.PA Comparison April 2026
BCP.LS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCP.LS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, ACA.PA has a market cap of 48.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BCP.LS is priced at €0.87, while ACA.PA trades at €16.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCP.LS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.89, whereas ACA.PA's P/E ratio is 7.31. In terms of profitability, BCP.LS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ACA.PA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BCP.LS is more volatile compared to ACA.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCP.LS.Check ACA.PA's competition here
BCP.LS vs GLE.PA Comparison April 2026
BCP.LS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCP.LS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, GLE.PA has a market cap of 45.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BCP.LS is priced at €0.87, while GLE.PA trades at €65.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCP.LS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.89, whereas GLE.PA's P/E ratio is 9.08. In terms of profitability, BCP.LS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GLE.PA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BCP.LS and GLE.PA have similar daily volatility (1.78).Check GLE.PA's competition here
BCP.LS vs KBC.BR Comparison April 2026
BCP.LS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCP.LS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, KBC.BR has a market cap of 41.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BCP.LS is priced at €0.87, while KBC.BR trades at €108.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCP.LS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.89, whereas KBC.BR's P/E ratio is 12.03. In terms of profitability, BCP.LS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KBC.BR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BCP.LS is less volatile compared to KBC.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCP.LS.Check KBC.BR's competition here
BCP.LS vs XBBDC.MC Comparison April 2026
BCP.LS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCP.LS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, XBBDC.MC has a market cap of 33B. Regarding current trading prices, BCP.LS is priced at €0.87, while XBBDC.MC trades at €3.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCP.LS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.89, whereas XBBDC.MC's P/E ratio is 8.91. In terms of profitability, BCP.LS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to XBBDC.MC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BCP.LS is more volatile compared to XBBDC.MC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCP.LS.Check XBBDC.MC's competition here
BCP.LS vs A5G.IR Comparison April 2026
BCP.LS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCP.LS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, A5G.IR has a market cap of 19.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BCP.LS is priced at €0.87, while A5G.IR trades at €8.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCP.LS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.89, whereas A5G.IR's P/E ratio is 9.69. In terms of profitability, BCP.LS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to A5G.IR's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BCP.LS is less volatile compared to A5G.IR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCP.LS.Check A5G.IR's competition here
BCP.LS vs BIRG.IR Comparison April 2026
BCP.LS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCP.LS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, BIRG.IR has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BCP.LS is priced at €0.87, while BIRG.IR trades at €15.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCP.LS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.89, whereas BIRG.IR's P/E ratio is 13.42. In terms of profitability, BCP.LS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BIRG.IR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BCP.LS is less volatile compared to BIRG.IR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCP.LS.Check BIRG.IR's competition here
BCP.LS vs VLK.AS Comparison April 2026
BCP.LS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCP.LS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, VLK.AS has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BCP.LS is priced at €0.87, while VLK.AS trades at €59.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCP.LS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.89, whereas VLK.AS's P/E ratio is 16.37. In terms of profitability, BCP.LS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to VLK.AS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BCP.LS is less volatile compared to VLK.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCP.LS.Check VLK.AS's competition here
BCP.LS vs PTSB.IR Comparison April 2026
BCP.LS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCP.LS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, PTSB.IR has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BCP.LS is priced at €0.87, while PTSB.IR trades at €2.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCP.LS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.89, whereas PTSB.IR's P/E ratio is 22.46. In terms of profitability, BCP.LS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PTSB.IR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BCP.LS is more volatile compared to PTSB.IR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCP.LS.Check PTSB.IR's competition here
BCP.LS vs IL0A.IR Comparison April 2026
BCP.LS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCP.LS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, IL0A.IR has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BCP.LS is priced at €0.87, while IL0A.IR trades at €2.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCP.LS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.89, whereas IL0A.IR's P/E ratio is 5.34. In terms of profitability, BCP.LS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to IL0A.IR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BCP.LS is less volatile compared to IL0A.IR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCP.LS.Check IL0A.IR's competition here
BCP.LS vs CAF.PA Comparison April 2026
BCP.LS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCP.LS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, CAF.PA has a market cap of 893.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BCP.LS is priced at €0.87, while CAF.PA trades at €114.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCP.LS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.89, whereas CAF.PA's P/E ratio is 13.14. In terms of profitability, BCP.LS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CAF.PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BCP.LS is less volatile compared to CAF.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCP.LS.Check CAF.PA's competition here
BCP.LS vs MLCFM.PA Comparison April 2026
BCP.LS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCP.LS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, MLCFM.PA has a market cap of 733.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BCP.LS is priced at €0.87, while MLCFM.PA trades at €1,280.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCP.LS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.89, whereas MLCFM.PA's P/E ratio is 14.72. In terms of profitability, BCP.LS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MLCFM.PA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BCP.LS is more volatile compared to MLCFM.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCP.LS.Check MLCFM.PA's competition here
BCP.LS vs CRBP2.PA Comparison April 2026
BCP.LS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCP.LS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, CRBP2.PA has a market cap of 386.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BCP.LS is priced at €0.87, while CRBP2.PA trades at €28.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCP.LS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.89, whereas CRBP2.PA's P/E ratio is 5.99. In terms of profitability, BCP.LS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CRBP2.PA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BCP.LS is more volatile compared to CRBP2.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCP.LS.Check CRBP2.PA's competition here
BCP.LS vs CNF.PA Comparison April 2026
BCP.LS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCP.LS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, CNF.PA has a market cap of 260.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BCP.LS is priced at €0.87, while CNF.PA trades at €16.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCP.LS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.89, whereas CNF.PA's P/E ratio is 4.65. In terms of profitability, BCP.LS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CNF.PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BCP.LS is more volatile compared to CNF.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCP.LS.Check CNF.PA's competition here
BCP.LS vs CIV.PA Comparison April 2026
BCP.LS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCP.LS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, CIV.PA has a market cap of 229.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BCP.LS is priced at €0.87, while CIV.PA trades at €102.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCP.LS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.89, whereas CIV.PA's P/E ratio is 10.19. In terms of profitability, BCP.LS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CIV.PA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BCP.LS is less volatile compared to CIV.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCP.LS.Check CIV.PA's competition here
BCP.LS vs BNB.BR Comparison April 2026
BCP.LS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCP.LS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, BNB.BR has a market cap of 161.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BCP.LS is priced at €0.87, while BNB.BR trades at €402.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCP.LS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.89, whereas BNB.BR's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, BCP.LS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BNB.BR's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BCP.LS is more volatile compared to BNB.BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCP.LS.Check BNB.BR's competition here
BCP.LS vs CMO.PA Comparison April 2026
BCP.LS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCP.LS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, CMO.PA has a market cap of 160M. Regarding current trading prices, BCP.LS is priced at €0.87, while CMO.PA trades at €105.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCP.LS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.89, whereas CMO.PA's P/E ratio is 7.85. In terms of profitability, BCP.LS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CMO.PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BCP.LS is less volatile compared to CMO.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCP.LS.Check CMO.PA's competition here
BCP.LS vs CRAV.PA Comparison April 2026
BCP.LS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCP.LS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, CRAV.PA has a market cap of 158.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BCP.LS is priced at €0.87, while CRAV.PA trades at €135.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCP.LS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.89, whereas CRAV.PA's P/E ratio is 12.10. In terms of profitability, BCP.LS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CRAV.PA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BCP.LS is less volatile compared to CRAV.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCP.LS.Check CRAV.PA's competition here
BCP.LS vs CAT31.PA Comparison April 2026
BCP.LS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCP.LS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, CAT31.PA has a market cap of 146.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BCP.LS is priced at €0.87, while CAT31.PA trades at €110.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCP.LS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.89, whereas CAT31.PA's P/E ratio is 7.93. In terms of profitability, BCP.LS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CAT31.PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BCP.LS is less volatile compared to CAT31.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCP.LS.Check CAT31.PA's competition here
BCP.LS vs CCN.PA Comparison April 2026
BCP.LS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCP.LS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, CCN.PA has a market cap of 138.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BCP.LS is priced at €0.87, while CCN.PA trades at €133.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCP.LS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.89, whereas CCN.PA's P/E ratio is 9.32. In terms of profitability, BCP.LS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CCN.PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BCP.LS is more volatile compared to CCN.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCP.LS.Check CCN.PA's competition here
BCP.LS vs CRLA.PA Comparison April 2026
BCP.LS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCP.LS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, CRLA.PA has a market cap of 133.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BCP.LS is priced at €0.87, while CRLA.PA trades at €76.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCP.LS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.89, whereas CRLA.PA's P/E ratio is 7.91. In terms of profitability, BCP.LS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CRLA.PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BCP.LS is less volatile compared to CRLA.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCP.LS.Check CRLA.PA's competition here
BCP.LS vs CRTO.PA Comparison April 2026
BCP.LS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCP.LS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, CRTO.PA has a market cap of 127.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BCP.LS is priced at €0.87, while CRTO.PA trades at €122.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCP.LS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.89, whereas CRTO.PA's P/E ratio is 12.07. In terms of profitability, BCP.LS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CRTO.PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BCP.LS is less volatile compared to CRTO.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCP.LS.Check CRTO.PA's competition here
BCP.LS vs CRSU.PA Comparison April 2026
BCP.LS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCP.LS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, CRSU.PA has a market cap of 118.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BCP.LS is priced at €0.87, while CRSU.PA trades at €199.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCP.LS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.89, whereas CRSU.PA's P/E ratio is 8.38. In terms of profitability, BCP.LS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CRSU.PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BCP.LS is more volatile compared to CRSU.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCP.LS.Check CRSU.PA's competition here
BCP.LS vs CRLO.PA Comparison April 2026
BCP.LS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCP.LS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, CRLO.PA has a market cap of 96.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BCP.LS is priced at €0.87, while CRLO.PA trades at €97.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCP.LS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.89, whereas CRLO.PA's P/E ratio is 12.34. In terms of profitability, BCP.LS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CRLO.PA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BCP.LS is more volatile compared to CRLO.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCP.LS.Check CRLO.PA's competition here
BCP.LS vs CRAP.PA Comparison April 2026
BCP.LS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCP.LS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, CRAP.PA has a market cap of 94.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BCP.LS is priced at €0.87, while CRAP.PA trades at €138.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCP.LS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.89, whereas CRAP.PA's P/E ratio is 7.64. In terms of profitability, BCP.LS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CRAP.PA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BCP.LS is more volatile compared to CRAP.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCP.LS.Check CRAP.PA's competition here
BCP.LS vs MLGRC.PA Comparison April 2026
BCP.LS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCP.LS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, MLGRC.PA has a market cap of 56M. Regarding current trading prices, BCP.LS is priced at €0.87, while MLGRC.PA trades at €23.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCP.LS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.89, whereas MLGRC.PA's P/E ratio is 74.38. In terms of profitability, BCP.LS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MLGRC.PA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BCP.LS is more volatile compared to MLGRC.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCP.LS.Check MLGRC.PA's competition here
BCP.LS vs KN.PA Comparison April 2026
BCP.LS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCP.LS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, KN.PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BCP.LS is priced at €0.87, while KN.PA trades at €4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCP.LS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.89, whereas KN.PA's P/E ratio is 25.01. In terms of profitability, BCP.LS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KN.PA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BCP.LS is more volatile compared to KN.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCP.LS.Check KN.PA's competition here
BCP.LS vs DD7E.IR Comparison April 2026
BCP.LS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCP.LS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, DD7E.IR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BCP.LS is priced at €0.87, while DD7E.IR trades at €23.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCP.LS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.89, whereas DD7E.IR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCP.LS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DD7E.IR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BCP.LS is more volatile compared to DD7E.IR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCP.LS.Check DD7E.IR's competition here