Brightcom Group Ltd.
Brightcom Group Ltd. (BCG.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (BCG.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Advertising Agencies Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BCG.NS | ₹8.36 | -2.45% | 17.3B | 1.98 | ₹4.34 | N/A |
| AFFLE.BO | ₹1,446.40 | +4.03% | 203.4B | 46.45 | ₹31.14 | N/A |
| AFFLE.NS | ₹1,422.30 | +2.05% | 203.3B | 46.32 | ₹31.22 | N/A |
| BCG.BO | ₹8.58 | +0.70% | 17.3B | 1.98 | ₹4.34 | N/A |
| SIGNPOST.NS | ₹226.25 | -3.04% | 12.3B | 24.54 | ₹9.38 | +0.22% |
| PRESSMN.NS | ₹265.00 | -0.54% | 6.2B | 161.59 | ₹1.64 | N/A |
| MAAGHADV.BO | ₹25.42 | +0.00% | 5.7B | -55.26 | -₹0.46 | N/A |
| RKSWAMY.NS | ₹72.63 | -7.85% | 3.7B | 20.01 | ₹3.67 | +2.04% |
| VERTOZ.NS | ₹30.00 | -17.79% | 2.7B | 6.27 | ₹5.10 | N/A |
| CIL.BO | ₹254.05 | -0.99% | 1.4B | 1411.39 | ₹0.18 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
BCG.NS vs AFFLE.BO Comparison April 2026
BCG.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCG.NS stands at 17.3B. In comparison, AFFLE.BO has a market cap of 203.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BCG.NS is priced at ₹8.36, while AFFLE.BO trades at ₹1,446.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCG.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.98, whereas AFFLE.BO's P/E ratio is 46.45. In terms of profitability, BCG.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AFFLE.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BCG.NS is more volatile compared to AFFLE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCG.NS.Check AFFLE.BO's competition here
BCG.NS vs AFFLE.NS Comparison April 2026
BCG.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCG.NS stands at 17.3B. In comparison, AFFLE.NS has a market cap of 203.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BCG.NS is priced at ₹8.36, while AFFLE.NS trades at ₹1,422.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCG.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.98, whereas AFFLE.NS's P/E ratio is 46.32. In terms of profitability, BCG.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AFFLE.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BCG.NS is more volatile compared to AFFLE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCG.NS.Check AFFLE.NS's competition here
BCG.NS vs BCG.BO Comparison April 2026
BCG.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCG.NS stands at 17.3B. In comparison, BCG.BO has a market cap of 17.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BCG.NS is priced at ₹8.36, while BCG.BO trades at ₹8.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCG.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.98, whereas BCG.BO's P/E ratio is 1.98. In terms of profitability, BCG.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BCG.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BCG.NS is more volatile compared to BCG.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCG.NS.Check BCG.BO's competition here
BCG.NS vs SIGNPOST.NS Comparison April 2026
BCG.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCG.NS stands at 17.3B. In comparison, SIGNPOST.NS has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BCG.NS is priced at ₹8.36, while SIGNPOST.NS trades at ₹226.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCG.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.98, whereas SIGNPOST.NS's P/E ratio is 24.54. In terms of profitability, BCG.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SIGNPOST.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BCG.NS is more volatile compared to SIGNPOST.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCG.NS.Check SIGNPOST.NS's competition here
BCG.NS vs PRESSMN.NS Comparison April 2026
BCG.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCG.NS stands at 17.3B. In comparison, PRESSMN.NS has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BCG.NS is priced at ₹8.36, while PRESSMN.NS trades at ₹265.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCG.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.98, whereas PRESSMN.NS's P/E ratio is 161.59. In terms of profitability, BCG.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PRESSMN.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BCG.NS is more volatile compared to PRESSMN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCG.NS.Check PRESSMN.NS's competition here
BCG.NS vs MAAGHADV.BO Comparison April 2026
BCG.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCG.NS stands at 17.3B. In comparison, MAAGHADV.BO has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BCG.NS is priced at ₹8.36, while MAAGHADV.BO trades at ₹25.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCG.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.98, whereas MAAGHADV.BO's P/E ratio is -55.26. In terms of profitability, BCG.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MAAGHADV.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BCG.NS is more volatile compared to MAAGHADV.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCG.NS.Check MAAGHADV.BO's competition here
BCG.NS vs RKSWAMY.NS Comparison April 2026
BCG.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCG.NS stands at 17.3B. In comparison, RKSWAMY.NS has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BCG.NS is priced at ₹8.36, while RKSWAMY.NS trades at ₹72.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCG.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.98, whereas RKSWAMY.NS's P/E ratio is 20.01. In terms of profitability, BCG.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RKSWAMY.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BCG.NS is more volatile compared to RKSWAMY.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCG.NS.Check RKSWAMY.NS's competition here
BCG.NS vs VERTOZ.NS Comparison April 2026
BCG.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCG.NS stands at 17.3B. In comparison, VERTOZ.NS has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BCG.NS is priced at ₹8.36, while VERTOZ.NS trades at ₹30.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCG.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.98, whereas VERTOZ.NS's P/E ratio is 6.27. In terms of profitability, BCG.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VERTOZ.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BCG.NS is more volatile compared to VERTOZ.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCG.NS.Check VERTOZ.NS's competition here
BCG.NS vs CIL.BO Comparison April 2026
BCG.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCG.NS stands at 17.3B. In comparison, CIL.BO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BCG.NS is priced at ₹8.36, while CIL.BO trades at ₹254.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCG.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.98, whereas CIL.BO's P/E ratio is 1411.39. In terms of profitability, BCG.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CIL.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BCG.NS is more volatile compared to CIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCG.NS.Check CIL.BO's competition here
BCG.NS vs LUHARUKA.BO Comparison April 2026
BCG.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCG.NS stands at 17.3B. In comparison, LUHARUKA.BO has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, BCG.NS is priced at ₹8.36, while LUHARUKA.BO trades at ₹4.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCG.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.98, whereas LUHARUKA.BO's P/E ratio is 235.00. In terms of profitability, BCG.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LUHARUKA.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCG.NS is more volatile compared to LUHARUKA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCG.NS.Check LUHARUKA.BO's competition here
BCG.NS vs TOUCHWOOD.NS Comparison April 2026
BCG.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCG.NS stands at 17.3B. In comparison, TOUCHWOOD.NS has a market cap of 765.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BCG.NS is priced at ₹8.36, while TOUCHWOOD.NS trades at ₹69.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCG.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.98, whereas TOUCHWOOD.NS's P/E ratio is 15.99. In terms of profitability, BCG.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TOUCHWOOD.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BCG.NS is more volatile compared to TOUCHWOOD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCG.NS.Check TOUCHWOOD.NS's competition here
BCG.NS vs MAXPOSURE.NS Comparison April 2026
BCG.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCG.NS stands at 17.3B. In comparison, MAXPOSURE.NS has a market cap of 758.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BCG.NS is priced at ₹8.36, while MAXPOSURE.NS trades at ₹33.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCG.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.98, whereas MAXPOSURE.NS's P/E ratio is 8.92. In terms of profitability, BCG.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MAXPOSURE.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BCG.NS is more volatile compared to MAXPOSURE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCG.NS.Check MAXPOSURE.NS's competition here
BCG.NS vs CRAYONS.NS Comparison April 2026
BCG.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCG.NS stands at 17.3B. In comparison, CRAYONS.NS has a market cap of 591.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BCG.NS is priced at ₹8.36, while CRAYONS.NS trades at ₹24.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCG.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.98, whereas CRAYONS.NS's P/E ratio is 5.51. In terms of profitability, BCG.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CRAYONS.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BCG.NS is less volatile compared to CRAYONS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCG.NS.Check CRAYONS.NS's competition here
BCG.NS vs GRAPHISAD.NS Comparison April 2026
BCG.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCG.NS stands at 17.3B. In comparison, GRAPHISAD.NS has a market cap of 565.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BCG.NS is priced at ₹8.36, while GRAPHISAD.NS trades at ₹29.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCG.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.98, whereas GRAPHISAD.NS's P/E ratio is 6.74. In terms of profitability, BCG.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GRAPHISAD.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BCG.NS is more volatile compared to GRAPHISAD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCG.NS.Check GRAPHISAD.NS's competition here
BCG.NS vs INNOVATUS.BO Comparison April 2026
BCG.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCG.NS stands at 17.3B. In comparison, INNOVATUS.BO has a market cap of 342.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BCG.NS is priced at ₹8.36, while INNOVATUS.BO trades at ₹14.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCG.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.98, whereas INNOVATUS.BO's P/E ratio is 16.64. In terms of profitability, BCG.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to INNOVATUS.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BCG.NS is more volatile compared to INNOVATUS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCG.NS.Check INNOVATUS.BO's competition here
BCG.NS vs BRANDBUCKT.BO Comparison April 2026
BCG.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCG.NS stands at 17.3B. In comparison, BRANDBUCKT.BO has a market cap of 113.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BCG.NS is priced at ₹8.36, while BRANDBUCKT.BO trades at ₹4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCG.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.98, whereas BRANDBUCKT.BO's P/E ratio is 17.50. In terms of profitability, BCG.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BRANDBUCKT.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BCG.NS is more volatile compared to BRANDBUCKT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCG.NS.Check BRANDBUCKT.BO's competition here
BCG.NS vs DAPS.BO Comparison April 2026
BCG.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCG.NS stands at 17.3B. In comparison, DAPS.BO has a market cap of 105.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BCG.NS is priced at ₹8.36, while DAPS.BO trades at ₹20.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCG.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.98, whereas DAPS.BO's P/E ratio is 8.53. In terms of profitability, BCG.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DAPS.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BCG.NS is more volatile compared to DAPS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCG.NS.Check DAPS.BO's competition here