Brightcom Group Ltd.
Brightcom Group Ltd. (BCG.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (BCG.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Advertising Agencies Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BCG.NS | ₹11.00 | -4.93% | 22.2B | 2.53 | ₹4.34 | N/A |
| AFFLE.NS | ₹1,398.50 | -7.36% | 196.6B | 44.75 | ₹31.25 | N/A |
| AFFLE.BO | ₹1,398.35 | -7.33% | 196.6B | 44.93 | ₹31.12 | N/A |
| BCG.BO | ₹11.02 | -4.92% | 22.2B | 2.54 | ₹4.34 | N/A |
| SIGNPOST.NS | ₹242.54 | -0.05% | 13B | 25.88 | ₹9.37 | +0.21% |
| PRESSMN.NS | ₹265.00 | -0.54% | 6.2B | 161.59 | ₹1.64 | N/A |
| MAAGHADV.BO | ₹25.42 | +0.00% | 5.7B | -55.26 | -₹0.46 | N/A |
| RKSWAMY.NS | ₹99.74 | -3.96% | 5B | 25.91 | ₹3.85 | +1.50% |
| VERTOZ.NS | ₹46.53 | -1.27% | 4B | 9.12 | ₹5.10 | N/A |
| CIL.BO | ₹264.35 | +0.00% | 1.4B | 1391.32 | ₹0.19 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
BCG.NS vs AFFLE.NS Comparison February 2026
BCG.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCG.NS stands at 22.2B. In comparison, AFFLE.NS has a market cap of 196.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BCG.NS is priced at ₹11.00, while AFFLE.NS trades at ₹1,398.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCG.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 2.53, whereas AFFLE.NS's P/E ratio is 44.75. In terms of profitability, BCG.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AFFLE.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BCG.NS is less volatile compared to AFFLE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCG.NS.Check AFFLE.NS's competition here
BCG.NS vs AFFLE.BO Comparison February 2026
BCG.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCG.NS stands at 22.2B. In comparison, AFFLE.BO has a market cap of 196.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BCG.NS is priced at ₹11.00, while AFFLE.BO trades at ₹1,398.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCG.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 2.53, whereas AFFLE.BO's P/E ratio is 44.93. In terms of profitability, BCG.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AFFLE.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BCG.NS is less volatile compared to AFFLE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCG.NS.Check AFFLE.BO's competition here
BCG.NS vs BCG.BO Comparison February 2026
BCG.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCG.NS stands at 22.2B. In comparison, BCG.BO has a market cap of 22.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BCG.NS is priced at ₹11.00, while BCG.BO trades at ₹11.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCG.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 2.53, whereas BCG.BO's P/E ratio is 2.54. In terms of profitability, BCG.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BCG.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BCG.NS is more volatile compared to BCG.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCG.NS.Check BCG.BO's competition here
BCG.NS vs SIGNPOST.NS Comparison February 2026
BCG.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCG.NS stands at 22.2B. In comparison, SIGNPOST.NS has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, BCG.NS is priced at ₹11.00, while SIGNPOST.NS trades at ₹242.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCG.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 2.53, whereas SIGNPOST.NS's P/E ratio is 25.88. In terms of profitability, BCG.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SIGNPOST.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BCG.NS is less volatile compared to SIGNPOST.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCG.NS.Check SIGNPOST.NS's competition here
BCG.NS vs PRESSMN.NS Comparison February 2026
BCG.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCG.NS stands at 22.2B. In comparison, PRESSMN.NS has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BCG.NS is priced at ₹11.00, while PRESSMN.NS trades at ₹265.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCG.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 2.53, whereas PRESSMN.NS's P/E ratio is 161.59. In terms of profitability, BCG.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PRESSMN.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BCG.NS is less volatile compared to PRESSMN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCG.NS.Check PRESSMN.NS's competition here
BCG.NS vs MAAGHADV.BO Comparison February 2026
BCG.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCG.NS stands at 22.2B. In comparison, MAAGHADV.BO has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BCG.NS is priced at ₹11.00, while MAAGHADV.BO trades at ₹25.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCG.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 2.53, whereas MAAGHADV.BO's P/E ratio is -55.26. In terms of profitability, BCG.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MAAGHADV.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BCG.NS is more volatile compared to MAAGHADV.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCG.NS.Check MAAGHADV.BO's competition here
BCG.NS vs RKSWAMY.NS Comparison February 2026
BCG.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCG.NS stands at 22.2B. In comparison, RKSWAMY.NS has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, BCG.NS is priced at ₹11.00, while RKSWAMY.NS trades at ₹99.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCG.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 2.53, whereas RKSWAMY.NS's P/E ratio is 25.91. In terms of profitability, BCG.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RKSWAMY.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BCG.NS is less volatile compared to RKSWAMY.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCG.NS.Check RKSWAMY.NS's competition here
BCG.NS vs VERTOZ.NS Comparison February 2026
BCG.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCG.NS stands at 22.2B. In comparison, VERTOZ.NS has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, BCG.NS is priced at ₹11.00, while VERTOZ.NS trades at ₹46.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCG.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 2.53, whereas VERTOZ.NS's P/E ratio is 9.12. In terms of profitability, BCG.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VERTOZ.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BCG.NS is less volatile compared to VERTOZ.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCG.NS.Check VERTOZ.NS's competition here
BCG.NS vs CIL.BO Comparison February 2026
BCG.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCG.NS stands at 22.2B. In comparison, CIL.BO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BCG.NS is priced at ₹11.00, while CIL.BO trades at ₹264.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCG.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 2.53, whereas CIL.BO's P/E ratio is 1391.32. In terms of profitability, BCG.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CIL.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BCG.NS is more volatile compared to CIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCG.NS.Check CIL.BO's competition here
BCG.NS vs LUHARUKA.BO Comparison February 2026
BCG.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCG.NS stands at 22.2B. In comparison, LUHARUKA.BO has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, BCG.NS is priced at ₹11.00, while LUHARUKA.BO trades at ₹4.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCG.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 2.53, whereas LUHARUKA.BO's P/E ratio is 235.00. In terms of profitability, BCG.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LUHARUKA.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCG.NS is more volatile compared to LUHARUKA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCG.NS.Check LUHARUKA.BO's competition here
BCG.NS vs TOUCHWOOD.NS Comparison February 2026
BCG.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCG.NS stands at 22.2B. In comparison, TOUCHWOOD.NS has a market cap of 943.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BCG.NS is priced at ₹11.00, while TOUCHWOOD.NS trades at ₹85.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCG.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 2.53, whereas TOUCHWOOD.NS's P/E ratio is 15.12. In terms of profitability, BCG.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TOUCHWOOD.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BCG.NS is more volatile compared to TOUCHWOOD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCG.NS.Check TOUCHWOOD.NS's competition here
BCG.NS vs INNOVATUS.BO Comparison February 2026
BCG.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCG.NS stands at 22.2B. In comparison, INNOVATUS.BO has a market cap of 342.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BCG.NS is priced at ₹11.00, while INNOVATUS.BO trades at ₹14.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCG.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 2.53, whereas INNOVATUS.BO's P/E ratio is 16.64. In terms of profitability, BCG.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to INNOVATUS.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BCG.NS is less volatile compared to INNOVATUS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCG.NS.Check INNOVATUS.BO's competition here
BCG.NS vs BRANDBUCKT.BO Comparison February 2026
BCG.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCG.NS stands at 22.2B. In comparison, BRANDBUCKT.BO has a market cap of 113.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BCG.NS is priced at ₹11.00, while BRANDBUCKT.BO trades at ₹4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCG.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 2.53, whereas BRANDBUCKT.BO's P/E ratio is 17.50. In terms of profitability, BCG.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BRANDBUCKT.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BCG.NS is less volatile compared to BRANDBUCKT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCG.NS.Check BRANDBUCKT.BO's competition here
BCG.NS vs DAPS.BO Comparison February 2026
BCG.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCG.NS stands at 22.2B. In comparison, DAPS.BO has a market cap of 88M. Regarding current trading prices, BCG.NS is priced at ₹11.00, while DAPS.BO trades at ₹17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCG.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 2.53, whereas DAPS.BO's P/E ratio is 7.14. In terms of profitability, BCG.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DAPS.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BCG.NS is more volatile compared to DAPS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCG.NS.Check DAPS.BO's competition here