Brightcom Group Limited
Brightcom Group Limited (BCG.BO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (BCG.BO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Advertising Agencies Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BCG.BO | ₹8.56 | +4.90% | 17.3B | 1.97 | ₹4.34 | N/A |
| AFFLE.NS | ₹1,437.40 | -0.81% | 202.1B | 46.13 | ₹31.16 | N/A |
| AFFLE.BO | ₹1,437.30 | -0.79% | 202.1B | 46.14 | ₹31.15 | N/A |
| BCG.NS | ₹8.57 | +4.90% | 17.3B | 1.97 | ₹4.34 | N/A |
| SIGNPOST.NS | ₹231.11 | +4.36% | 12.4B | 24.66 | ₹9.37 | +0.23% |
| PRESSMN.NS | ₹265.00 | -0.54% | 6.2B | 161.59 | ₹1.64 | N/A |
| MAAGHADV.BO | ₹25.42 | +0.00% | 5.7B | -55.26 | -₹0.46 | N/A |
| RKSWAMY.NS | ₹74.68 | +8.20% | 3.8B | 20.35 | ₹3.67 | +2.17% |
| VERTOZ.NS | ₹31.14 | +10.46% | 2.7B | 6.11 | ₹5.10 | N/A |
| CIL.BO | ₹251.55 | -0.98% | 1.4B | 1397.50 | ₹0.18 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
BCG.BO vs AFFLE.NS Comparison April 2026
BCG.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCG.BO stands at 17.3B. In comparison, AFFLE.NS has a market cap of 202.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BCG.BO is priced at ₹8.56, while AFFLE.NS trades at ₹1,437.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.97, whereas AFFLE.NS's P/E ratio is 46.13. In terms of profitability, BCG.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AFFLE.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BCG.BO is more volatile compared to AFFLE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCG.BO.Check AFFLE.NS's competition here
BCG.BO vs AFFLE.BO Comparison April 2026
BCG.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCG.BO stands at 17.3B. In comparison, AFFLE.BO has a market cap of 202.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BCG.BO is priced at ₹8.56, while AFFLE.BO trades at ₹1,437.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.97, whereas AFFLE.BO's P/E ratio is 46.14. In terms of profitability, BCG.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AFFLE.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BCG.BO is more volatile compared to AFFLE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCG.BO.Check AFFLE.BO's competition here
BCG.BO vs BCG.NS Comparison April 2026
BCG.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCG.BO stands at 17.3B. In comparison, BCG.NS has a market cap of 17.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BCG.BO is priced at ₹8.56, while BCG.NS trades at ₹8.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.97, whereas BCG.NS's P/E ratio is 1.97. In terms of profitability, BCG.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BCG.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BCG.BO is more volatile compared to BCG.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCG.BO.Check BCG.NS's competition here
BCG.BO vs SIGNPOST.NS Comparison April 2026
BCG.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCG.BO stands at 17.3B. In comparison, SIGNPOST.NS has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BCG.BO is priced at ₹8.56, while SIGNPOST.NS trades at ₹231.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.97, whereas SIGNPOST.NS's P/E ratio is 24.66. In terms of profitability, BCG.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SIGNPOST.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BCG.BO is more volatile compared to SIGNPOST.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCG.BO.Check SIGNPOST.NS's competition here
BCG.BO vs PRESSMN.NS Comparison April 2026
BCG.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCG.BO stands at 17.3B. In comparison, PRESSMN.NS has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BCG.BO is priced at ₹8.56, while PRESSMN.NS trades at ₹265.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.97, whereas PRESSMN.NS's P/E ratio is 161.59. In terms of profitability, BCG.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PRESSMN.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BCG.BO is more volatile compared to PRESSMN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCG.BO.Check PRESSMN.NS's competition here
BCG.BO vs MAAGHADV.BO Comparison April 2026
BCG.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCG.BO stands at 17.3B. In comparison, MAAGHADV.BO has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BCG.BO is priced at ₹8.56, while MAAGHADV.BO trades at ₹25.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.97, whereas MAAGHADV.BO's P/E ratio is -55.26. In terms of profitability, BCG.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MAAGHADV.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BCG.BO is more volatile compared to MAAGHADV.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCG.BO.Check MAAGHADV.BO's competition here
BCG.BO vs RKSWAMY.NS Comparison April 2026
BCG.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCG.BO stands at 17.3B. In comparison, RKSWAMY.NS has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BCG.BO is priced at ₹8.56, while RKSWAMY.NS trades at ₹74.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.97, whereas RKSWAMY.NS's P/E ratio is 20.35. In terms of profitability, BCG.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RKSWAMY.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BCG.BO is more volatile compared to RKSWAMY.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCG.BO.Check RKSWAMY.NS's competition here
BCG.BO vs VERTOZ.NS Comparison April 2026
BCG.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCG.BO stands at 17.3B. In comparison, VERTOZ.NS has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BCG.BO is priced at ₹8.56, while VERTOZ.NS trades at ₹31.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.97, whereas VERTOZ.NS's P/E ratio is 6.11. In terms of profitability, BCG.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VERTOZ.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BCG.BO is less volatile compared to VERTOZ.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCG.BO.Check VERTOZ.NS's competition here
BCG.BO vs CIL.BO Comparison April 2026
BCG.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCG.BO stands at 17.3B. In comparison, CIL.BO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BCG.BO is priced at ₹8.56, while CIL.BO trades at ₹251.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.97, whereas CIL.BO's P/E ratio is 1397.50. In terms of profitability, BCG.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CIL.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BCG.BO is more volatile compared to CIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCG.BO.Check CIL.BO's competition here
BCG.BO vs LUHARUKA.BO Comparison April 2026
BCG.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCG.BO stands at 17.3B. In comparison, LUHARUKA.BO has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, BCG.BO is priced at ₹8.56, while LUHARUKA.BO trades at ₹4.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.97, whereas LUHARUKA.BO's P/E ratio is 235.00. In terms of profitability, BCG.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LUHARUKA.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCG.BO is more volatile compared to LUHARUKA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCG.BO.Check LUHARUKA.BO's competition here
BCG.BO vs MAXPOSURE.NS Comparison April 2026
BCG.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCG.BO stands at 17.3B. In comparison, MAXPOSURE.NS has a market cap of 750.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BCG.BO is priced at ₹8.56, while MAXPOSURE.NS trades at ₹33.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.97, whereas MAXPOSURE.NS's P/E ratio is 8.82. In terms of profitability, BCG.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MAXPOSURE.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BCG.BO is more volatile compared to MAXPOSURE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCG.BO.Check MAXPOSURE.NS's competition here
BCG.BO vs TOUCHWOOD.NS Comparison April 2026
BCG.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCG.BO stands at 17.3B. In comparison, TOUCHWOOD.NS has a market cap of 730.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BCG.BO is priced at ₹8.56, while TOUCHWOOD.NS trades at ₹65.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.97, whereas TOUCHWOOD.NS's P/E ratio is 15.25. In terms of profitability, BCG.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TOUCHWOOD.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BCG.BO is more volatile compared to TOUCHWOOD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCG.BO.Check TOUCHWOOD.NS's competition here
BCG.BO vs CRAYONS.NS Comparison April 2026
BCG.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCG.BO stands at 17.3B. In comparison, CRAYONS.NS has a market cap of 725.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BCG.BO is priced at ₹8.56, while CRAYONS.NS trades at ₹29.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.97, whereas CRAYONS.NS's P/E ratio is 6.77. In terms of profitability, BCG.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CRAYONS.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BCG.BO is less volatile compared to CRAYONS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCG.BO.Check CRAYONS.NS's competition here
BCG.BO vs GRAPHISAD.NS Comparison April 2026
BCG.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCG.BO stands at 17.3B. In comparison, GRAPHISAD.NS has a market cap of 619.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BCG.BO is priced at ₹8.56, while GRAPHISAD.NS trades at ₹33.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.97, whereas GRAPHISAD.NS's P/E ratio is 7.39. In terms of profitability, BCG.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GRAPHISAD.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BCG.BO is more volatile compared to GRAPHISAD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCG.BO.Check GRAPHISAD.NS's competition here
BCG.BO vs INNOVATUS.BO Comparison April 2026
BCG.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCG.BO stands at 17.3B. In comparison, INNOVATUS.BO has a market cap of 342.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BCG.BO is priced at ₹8.56, while INNOVATUS.BO trades at ₹14.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.97, whereas INNOVATUS.BO's P/E ratio is 16.64. In terms of profitability, BCG.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to INNOVATUS.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BCG.BO is less volatile compared to INNOVATUS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCG.BO.Check INNOVATUS.BO's competition here
BCG.BO vs BRANDBUCKT.BO Comparison April 2026
BCG.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCG.BO stands at 17.3B. In comparison, BRANDBUCKT.BO has a market cap of 113.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BCG.BO is priced at ₹8.56, while BRANDBUCKT.BO trades at ₹4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.97, whereas BRANDBUCKT.BO's P/E ratio is 17.50. In terms of profitability, BCG.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BRANDBUCKT.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BCG.BO is less volatile compared to BRANDBUCKT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCG.BO.Check BRANDBUCKT.BO's competition here
BCG.BO vs DAPS.BO Comparison April 2026
BCG.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCG.BO stands at 17.3B. In comparison, DAPS.BO has a market cap of 105.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BCG.BO is priced at ₹8.56, while DAPS.BO trades at ₹20.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.97, whereas DAPS.BO's P/E ratio is 8.53. In terms of profitability, BCG.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DAPS.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BCG.BO is more volatile compared to DAPS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCG.BO.Check DAPS.BO's competition here