Brightcom Group Limited
Brightcom Group Limited (BCG.BO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (BCG.BO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Advertising Agencies Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BCG.BO | ₹11.55 | +1.14% | 22.3B | 2.76 | ₹4.01 | N/A |
| AFFLE.BO | ₹1,510.00 | +0.59% | 211.6B | 48.31 | ₹31.15 | N/A |
| AFFLE.NS | ₹1,510.00 | +0.53% | 209B | 47.60 | ₹31.22 | N/A |
| BCG.NS | ₹11.51 | +0.96% | 22.3B | 2.76 | ₹4.01 | N/A |
| SIGNPOST.NS | ₹243.00 | +0.46% | 13B | 25.92 | ₹9.37 | +0.21% |
| PRESSMN.NS | ₹265.00 | -0.54% | 6.2B | 161.59 | ₹1.64 | N/A |
| MAAGHADV.BO | ₹25.42 | +0.00% | 5.7B | -55.26 | -₹0.46 | N/A |
| RKSWAMY.NS | ₹103.66 | -0.93% | 5.3B | 27.10 | ₹3.85 | +1.44% |
| VERTOZ.NS | ₹47.07 | -3.33% | 4.1B | 9.39 | ₹5.10 | N/A |
| CIL.BO | ₹264.35 | -1.97% | 1.4B | 1405.26 | ₹0.19 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
BCG.BO vs AFFLE.BO Comparison February 2026
BCG.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCG.BO stands at 22.3B. In comparison, AFFLE.BO has a market cap of 211.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BCG.BO is priced at ₹11.55, while AFFLE.BO trades at ₹1,510.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.76, whereas AFFLE.BO's P/E ratio is 48.31. In terms of profitability, BCG.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AFFLE.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BCG.BO is more volatile compared to AFFLE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCG.BO.Check AFFLE.BO's competition here
BCG.BO vs AFFLE.NS Comparison February 2026
BCG.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCG.BO stands at 22.3B. In comparison, AFFLE.NS has a market cap of 209B. Regarding current trading prices, BCG.BO is priced at ₹11.55, while AFFLE.NS trades at ₹1,510.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.76, whereas AFFLE.NS's P/E ratio is 47.60. In terms of profitability, BCG.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AFFLE.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BCG.BO is more volatile compared to AFFLE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCG.BO.Check AFFLE.NS's competition here
BCG.BO vs BCG.NS Comparison February 2026
BCG.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCG.BO stands at 22.3B. In comparison, BCG.NS has a market cap of 22.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BCG.BO is priced at ₹11.55, while BCG.NS trades at ₹11.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.76, whereas BCG.NS's P/E ratio is 2.76. In terms of profitability, BCG.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BCG.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BCG.BO is more volatile compared to BCG.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCG.BO.Check BCG.NS's competition here
BCG.BO vs SIGNPOST.NS Comparison February 2026
BCG.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCG.BO stands at 22.3B. In comparison, SIGNPOST.NS has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, BCG.BO is priced at ₹11.55, while SIGNPOST.NS trades at ₹243.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.76, whereas SIGNPOST.NS's P/E ratio is 25.92. In terms of profitability, BCG.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SIGNPOST.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BCG.BO is more volatile compared to SIGNPOST.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCG.BO.Check SIGNPOST.NS's competition here
BCG.BO vs PRESSMN.NS Comparison February 2026
BCG.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCG.BO stands at 22.3B. In comparison, PRESSMN.NS has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BCG.BO is priced at ₹11.55, while PRESSMN.NS trades at ₹265.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.76, whereas PRESSMN.NS's P/E ratio is 161.59. In terms of profitability, BCG.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PRESSMN.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BCG.BO is more volatile compared to PRESSMN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCG.BO.Check PRESSMN.NS's competition here
BCG.BO vs MAAGHADV.BO Comparison February 2026
BCG.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCG.BO stands at 22.3B. In comparison, MAAGHADV.BO has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BCG.BO is priced at ₹11.55, while MAAGHADV.BO trades at ₹25.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.76, whereas MAAGHADV.BO's P/E ratio is -55.26. In terms of profitability, BCG.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MAAGHADV.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BCG.BO is more volatile compared to MAAGHADV.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCG.BO.Check MAAGHADV.BO's competition here
BCG.BO vs RKSWAMY.NS Comparison February 2026
BCG.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCG.BO stands at 22.3B. In comparison, RKSWAMY.NS has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BCG.BO is priced at ₹11.55, while RKSWAMY.NS trades at ₹103.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.76, whereas RKSWAMY.NS's P/E ratio is 27.10. In terms of profitability, BCG.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RKSWAMY.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BCG.BO is more volatile compared to RKSWAMY.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCG.BO.Check RKSWAMY.NS's competition here
BCG.BO vs VERTOZ.NS Comparison February 2026
BCG.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCG.BO stands at 22.3B. In comparison, VERTOZ.NS has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BCG.BO is priced at ₹11.55, while VERTOZ.NS trades at ₹47.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.76, whereas VERTOZ.NS's P/E ratio is 9.39. In terms of profitability, BCG.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VERTOZ.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BCG.BO is more volatile compared to VERTOZ.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCG.BO.Check VERTOZ.NS's competition here
BCG.BO vs CIL.BO Comparison February 2026
BCG.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCG.BO stands at 22.3B. In comparison, CIL.BO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BCG.BO is priced at ₹11.55, while CIL.BO trades at ₹264.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.76, whereas CIL.BO's P/E ratio is 1405.26. In terms of profitability, BCG.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CIL.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BCG.BO is more volatile compared to CIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCG.BO.Check CIL.BO's competition here
BCG.BO vs LUHARUKA.BO Comparison February 2026
BCG.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCG.BO stands at 22.3B. In comparison, LUHARUKA.BO has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, BCG.BO is priced at ₹11.55, while LUHARUKA.BO trades at ₹4.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.76, whereas LUHARUKA.BO's P/E ratio is 235.00. In terms of profitability, BCG.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LUHARUKA.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BCG.BO is more volatile compared to LUHARUKA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCG.BO.Check LUHARUKA.BO's competition here
BCG.BO vs TOUCHWOOD.NS Comparison February 2026
BCG.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCG.BO stands at 22.3B. In comparison, TOUCHWOOD.NS has a market cap of 944.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BCG.BO is priced at ₹11.55, while TOUCHWOOD.NS trades at ₹85.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.76, whereas TOUCHWOOD.NS's P/E ratio is 15.13. In terms of profitability, BCG.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TOUCHWOOD.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BCG.BO is more volatile compared to TOUCHWOOD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCG.BO.Check TOUCHWOOD.NS's competition here
BCG.BO vs INNOVATUS.BO Comparison February 2026
BCG.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCG.BO stands at 22.3B. In comparison, INNOVATUS.BO has a market cap of 342.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BCG.BO is priced at ₹11.55, while INNOVATUS.BO trades at ₹14.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.76, whereas INNOVATUS.BO's P/E ratio is 16.64. In terms of profitability, BCG.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to INNOVATUS.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BCG.BO is more volatile compared to INNOVATUS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCG.BO.Check INNOVATUS.BO's competition here
BCG.BO vs BRANDBUCKT.BO Comparison February 2026
BCG.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCG.BO stands at 22.3B. In comparison, BRANDBUCKT.BO has a market cap of 113.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BCG.BO is priced at ₹11.55, while BRANDBUCKT.BO trades at ₹4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.76, whereas BRANDBUCKT.BO's P/E ratio is 17.50. In terms of profitability, BCG.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BRANDBUCKT.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BCG.BO is more volatile compared to BRANDBUCKT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCG.BO.Check BRANDBUCKT.BO's competition here
BCG.BO vs DAPS.BO Comparison February 2026
BCG.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCG.BO stands at 22.3B. In comparison, DAPS.BO has a market cap of 96.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BCG.BO is priced at ₹11.55, while DAPS.BO trades at ₹17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.76, whereas DAPS.BO's P/E ratio is 7.82. In terms of profitability, BCG.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DAPS.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BCG.BO is more volatile compared to DAPS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCG.BO.Check DAPS.BO's competition here