BCC Fuba India Limited
BCC Fuba India Limited (BCCFUBA.BO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (BCCFUBA.BO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BCCFUBA.BO | ₹164.00 | -1.91% | 2.5B | 53.31 | ₹3.08 | N/A |
| POWERINDIA.BO | ₹25,355.05 | +1.82% | 1.1T | 130.48 | ₹191.57 | +0.02% |
| POWERINDIA.NS | ₹25,350.00 | +1.79% | 1.1T | 130.38 | ₹191.52 | +0.02% |
| PGEL.BO | ₹622.30 | +1.36% | 176.9B | 63.32 | ₹9.82 | +0.04% |
| PGEL.NS | ₹622.50 | +1.49% | 176.9B | 63.37 | ₹9.81 | +0.04% |
| SYRMA.BO | ₹835.20 | +1.00% | 160.7B | 54.48 | ₹15.31 | +0.18% |
| SYRMA.NS | ₹837.65 | +1.29% | 160.6B | 54.43 | ₹15.32 | +0.18% |
| AVALON.NS | ₹1,000.50 | +2.22% | 66B | 69.17 | ₹14.29 | N/A |
| AVALON.BO | ₹1,001.45 | +2.47% | 65.7B | 68.42 | ₹14.39 | N/A |
| KRN.NS | ₹1,010.00 | +6.74% | 62.1B | 91.71 | ₹10.90 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
BCCFUBA.BO vs POWERINDIA.BO Comparison February 2026
BCCFUBA.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCCFUBA.BO stands at 2.5B. In comparison, POWERINDIA.BO has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, BCCFUBA.BO is priced at ₹164.00, while POWERINDIA.BO trades at ₹25,355.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCCFUBA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 53.31, whereas POWERINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 130.48. In terms of profitability, BCCFUBA.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to POWERINDIA.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BCCFUBA.BO is more volatile compared to POWERINDIA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCCFUBA.BO.Check POWERINDIA.BO's competition here
BCCFUBA.BO vs POWERINDIA.NS Comparison February 2026
BCCFUBA.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCCFUBA.BO stands at 2.5B. In comparison, POWERINDIA.NS has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, BCCFUBA.BO is priced at ₹164.00, while POWERINDIA.NS trades at ₹25,350.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCCFUBA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 53.31, whereas POWERINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 130.38. In terms of profitability, BCCFUBA.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to POWERINDIA.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BCCFUBA.BO is more volatile compared to POWERINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCCFUBA.BO.Check POWERINDIA.NS's competition here
BCCFUBA.BO vs PGEL.BO Comparison February 2026
BCCFUBA.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCCFUBA.BO stands at 2.5B. In comparison, PGEL.BO has a market cap of 176.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BCCFUBA.BO is priced at ₹164.00, while PGEL.BO trades at ₹622.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCCFUBA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 53.31, whereas PGEL.BO's P/E ratio is 63.32. In terms of profitability, BCCFUBA.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PGEL.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BCCFUBA.BO is more volatile compared to PGEL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCCFUBA.BO.Check PGEL.BO's competition here
BCCFUBA.BO vs PGEL.NS Comparison February 2026
BCCFUBA.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCCFUBA.BO stands at 2.5B. In comparison, PGEL.NS has a market cap of 176.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BCCFUBA.BO is priced at ₹164.00, while PGEL.NS trades at ₹622.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCCFUBA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 53.31, whereas PGEL.NS's P/E ratio is 63.37. In terms of profitability, BCCFUBA.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PGEL.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BCCFUBA.BO is more volatile compared to PGEL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCCFUBA.BO.Check PGEL.NS's competition here
BCCFUBA.BO vs SYRMA.BO Comparison February 2026
BCCFUBA.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCCFUBA.BO stands at 2.5B. In comparison, SYRMA.BO has a market cap of 160.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BCCFUBA.BO is priced at ₹164.00, while SYRMA.BO trades at ₹835.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCCFUBA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 53.31, whereas SYRMA.BO's P/E ratio is 54.48. In terms of profitability, BCCFUBA.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SYRMA.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BCCFUBA.BO is more volatile compared to SYRMA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCCFUBA.BO.Check SYRMA.BO's competition here
BCCFUBA.BO vs SYRMA.NS Comparison February 2026
BCCFUBA.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCCFUBA.BO stands at 2.5B. In comparison, SYRMA.NS has a market cap of 160.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BCCFUBA.BO is priced at ₹164.00, while SYRMA.NS trades at ₹837.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCCFUBA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 53.31, whereas SYRMA.NS's P/E ratio is 54.43. In terms of profitability, BCCFUBA.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SYRMA.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BCCFUBA.BO is more volatile compared to SYRMA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCCFUBA.BO.Check SYRMA.NS's competition here
BCCFUBA.BO vs AVALON.NS Comparison February 2026
BCCFUBA.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCCFUBA.BO stands at 2.5B. In comparison, AVALON.NS has a market cap of 66B. Regarding current trading prices, BCCFUBA.BO is priced at ₹164.00, while AVALON.NS trades at ₹1,000.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCCFUBA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 53.31, whereas AVALON.NS's P/E ratio is 69.17. In terms of profitability, BCCFUBA.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AVALON.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BCCFUBA.BO is more volatile compared to AVALON.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCCFUBA.BO.Check AVALON.NS's competition here
BCCFUBA.BO vs AVALON.BO Comparison February 2026
BCCFUBA.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCCFUBA.BO stands at 2.5B. In comparison, AVALON.BO has a market cap of 65.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BCCFUBA.BO is priced at ₹164.00, while AVALON.BO trades at ₹1,001.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCCFUBA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 53.31, whereas AVALON.BO's P/E ratio is 68.42. In terms of profitability, BCCFUBA.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AVALON.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BCCFUBA.BO is more volatile compared to AVALON.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCCFUBA.BO.Check AVALON.BO's competition here
BCCFUBA.BO vs KRN.NS Comparison February 2026
BCCFUBA.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCCFUBA.BO stands at 2.5B. In comparison, KRN.NS has a market cap of 62.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BCCFUBA.BO is priced at ₹164.00, while KRN.NS trades at ₹1,010.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCCFUBA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 53.31, whereas KRN.NS's P/E ratio is 91.71. In terms of profitability, BCCFUBA.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to KRN.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BCCFUBA.BO is less volatile compared to KRN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCCFUBA.BO.Check KRN.NS's competition here
BCCFUBA.BO vs CENTUM.NS Comparison February 2026
BCCFUBA.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCCFUBA.BO stands at 2.5B. In comparison, CENTUM.NS has a market cap of 39.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BCCFUBA.BO is priced at ₹164.00, while CENTUM.NS trades at ₹2,662.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCCFUBA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 53.31, whereas CENTUM.NS's P/E ratio is -771.38. In terms of profitability, BCCFUBA.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CENTUM.NS's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BCCFUBA.BO is more volatile compared to CENTUM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCCFUBA.BO.Check CENTUM.NS's competition here
BCCFUBA.BO vs CENTUM.BO Comparison February 2026
BCCFUBA.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCCFUBA.BO stands at 2.5B. In comparison, CENTUM.BO has a market cap of 39.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BCCFUBA.BO is priced at ₹164.00, while CENTUM.BO trades at ₹2,652.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCCFUBA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 53.31, whereas CENTUM.BO's P/E ratio is -773.00. In terms of profitability, BCCFUBA.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CENTUM.BO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BCCFUBA.BO is more volatile compared to CENTUM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCCFUBA.BO.Check CENTUM.BO's competition here
BCCFUBA.BO vs CYIENTDLM.NS Comparison February 2026
BCCFUBA.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCCFUBA.BO stands at 2.5B. In comparison, CYIENTDLM.NS has a market cap of 24.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BCCFUBA.BO is priced at ₹164.00, while CYIENTDLM.NS trades at ₹311.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCCFUBA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 53.31, whereas CYIENTDLM.NS's P/E ratio is 30.31. In terms of profitability, BCCFUBA.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CYIENTDLM.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BCCFUBA.BO is more volatile compared to CYIENTDLM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCCFUBA.BO.Check CYIENTDLM.NS's competition here
BCCFUBA.BO vs CYIENTDLM.BO Comparison February 2026
BCCFUBA.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCCFUBA.BO stands at 2.5B. In comparison, CYIENTDLM.BO has a market cap of 24.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BCCFUBA.BO is priced at ₹164.00, while CYIENTDLM.BO trades at ₹312.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCCFUBA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 53.31, whereas CYIENTDLM.BO's P/E ratio is 30.25. In terms of profitability, BCCFUBA.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CYIENTDLM.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BCCFUBA.BO is more volatile compared to CYIENTDLM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCCFUBA.BO.Check CYIENTDLM.BO's competition here
BCCFUBA.BO vs RISHABH.BO Comparison February 2026
BCCFUBA.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCCFUBA.BO stands at 2.5B. In comparison, RISHABH.BO has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BCCFUBA.BO is priced at ₹164.00, while RISHABH.BO trades at ₹424.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCCFUBA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 53.31, whereas RISHABH.BO's P/E ratio is 23.40. In terms of profitability, BCCFUBA.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to RISHABH.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BCCFUBA.BO is more volatile compared to RISHABH.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCCFUBA.BO.Check RISHABH.BO's competition here
BCCFUBA.BO vs RISHABH.NS Comparison February 2026
BCCFUBA.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCCFUBA.BO stands at 2.5B. In comparison, RISHABH.NS has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BCCFUBA.BO is priced at ₹164.00, while RISHABH.NS trades at ₹426.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCCFUBA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 53.31, whereas RISHABH.NS's P/E ratio is 23.39. In terms of profitability, BCCFUBA.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to RISHABH.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BCCFUBA.BO is more volatile compared to RISHABH.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCCFUBA.BO.Check RISHABH.NS's competition here
BCCFUBA.BO vs ELPROINTL.BO Comparison February 2026
BCCFUBA.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCCFUBA.BO stands at 2.5B. In comparison, ELPROINTL.BO has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BCCFUBA.BO is priced at ₹164.00, while ELPROINTL.BO trades at ₹85.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCCFUBA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 53.31, whereas ELPROINTL.BO's P/E ratio is 7.81. In terms of profitability, BCCFUBA.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ELPROINTL.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BCCFUBA.BO is more volatile compared to ELPROINTL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCCFUBA.BO.Check ELPROINTL.BO's competition here
BCCFUBA.BO vs IKIO.BO Comparison February 2026
BCCFUBA.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCCFUBA.BO stands at 2.5B. In comparison, IKIO.BO has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BCCFUBA.BO is priced at ₹164.00, while IKIO.BO trades at ₹144.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCCFUBA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 53.31, whereas IKIO.BO's P/E ratio is 47.19. In terms of profitability, BCCFUBA.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to IKIO.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BCCFUBA.BO is more volatile compared to IKIO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCCFUBA.BO.Check IKIO.BO's competition here
BCCFUBA.BO vs IKIO.NS Comparison February 2026
BCCFUBA.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCCFUBA.BO stands at 2.5B. In comparison, IKIO.NS has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, BCCFUBA.BO is priced at ₹164.00, while IKIO.NS trades at ₹143.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCCFUBA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 53.31, whereas IKIO.NS's P/E ratio is 47.37. In terms of profitability, BCCFUBA.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to IKIO.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BCCFUBA.BO is more volatile compared to IKIO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCCFUBA.BO.Check IKIO.NS's competition here
BCCFUBA.BO vs IIL.BO Comparison February 2026
BCCFUBA.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCCFUBA.BO stands at 2.5B. In comparison, IIL.BO has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BCCFUBA.BO is priced at ₹164.00, while IIL.BO trades at ₹45.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCCFUBA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 53.31, whereas IIL.BO's P/E ratio is 13.27. In terms of profitability, BCCFUBA.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to IIL.BO's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, BCCFUBA.BO is more volatile compared to IIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCCFUBA.BO.Check IIL.BO's competition here
BCCFUBA.BO vs MICEL.NS Comparison February 2026
BCCFUBA.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCCFUBA.BO stands at 2.5B. In comparison, MICEL.NS has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BCCFUBA.BO is priced at ₹164.00, while MICEL.NS trades at ₹38.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCCFUBA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 53.31, whereas MICEL.NS's P/E ratio is 105.24. In terms of profitability, BCCFUBA.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MICEL.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BCCFUBA.BO is more volatile compared to MICEL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCCFUBA.BO.Check MICEL.NS's competition here
BCCFUBA.BO vs NITIRAJ.NS Comparison February 2026
BCCFUBA.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCCFUBA.BO stands at 2.5B. In comparison, NITIRAJ.NS has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BCCFUBA.BO is priced at ₹164.00, while NITIRAJ.NS trades at ₹206.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCCFUBA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 53.31, whereas NITIRAJ.NS's P/E ratio is 28.13. In terms of profitability, BCCFUBA.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NITIRAJ.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BCCFUBA.BO is more volatile compared to NITIRAJ.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCCFUBA.BO.Check NITIRAJ.NS's competition here
BCCFUBA.BO vs GUJARATPOLY.BO Comparison February 2026
BCCFUBA.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCCFUBA.BO stands at 2.5B. In comparison, GUJARATPOLY.BO has a market cap of 538.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BCCFUBA.BO is priced at ₹164.00, while GUJARATPOLY.BO trades at ₹61.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCCFUBA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 53.31, whereas GUJARATPOLY.BO's P/E ratio is 1.89. In terms of profitability, BCCFUBA.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GUJARATPOLY.BO's ROE of +1.70%. Regarding short-term risk, BCCFUBA.BO is less volatile compared to GUJARATPOLY.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCCFUBA.BO.Check GUJARATPOLY.BO's competition here
BCCFUBA.BO vs INCAP.BO Comparison February 2026
BCCFUBA.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCCFUBA.BO stands at 2.5B. In comparison, INCAP.BO has a market cap of 488.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BCCFUBA.BO is priced at ₹164.00, while INCAP.BO trades at ₹98.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCCFUBA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 53.31, whereas INCAP.BO's P/E ratio is 84.23. In terms of profitability, BCCFUBA.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to INCAP.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BCCFUBA.BO is less volatile compared to INCAP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCCFUBA.BO.Check INCAP.BO's competition here
BCCFUBA.BO vs FINELINE.BO Comparison February 2026
BCCFUBA.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCCFUBA.BO stands at 2.5B. In comparison, FINELINE.BO has a market cap of 384.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BCCFUBA.BO is priced at ₹164.00, while FINELINE.BO trades at ₹79.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCCFUBA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 53.31, whereas FINELINE.BO's P/E ratio is 177.76. In terms of profitability, BCCFUBA.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FINELINE.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BCCFUBA.BO is more volatile compared to FINELINE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCCFUBA.BO.Check FINELINE.BO's competition here
BCCFUBA.BO vs JMDVL.BO Comparison February 2026
BCCFUBA.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCCFUBA.BO stands at 2.5B. In comparison, JMDVL.BO has a market cap of 191.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BCCFUBA.BO is priced at ₹164.00, while JMDVL.BO trades at ₹6.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCCFUBA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 53.31, whereas JMDVL.BO's P/E ratio is 26.52. In terms of profitability, BCCFUBA.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to JMDVL.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BCCFUBA.BO is more volatile compared to JMDVL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCCFUBA.BO.Check JMDVL.BO's competition here
BCCFUBA.BO vs PANELEC.BO Comparison February 2026
BCCFUBA.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCCFUBA.BO stands at 2.5B. In comparison, PANELEC.BO has a market cap of 157.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BCCFUBA.BO is priced at ₹164.00, while PANELEC.BO trades at ₹40.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCCFUBA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 53.31, whereas PANELEC.BO's P/E ratio is -4.45. In terms of profitability, BCCFUBA.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PANELEC.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BCCFUBA.BO is more volatile compared to PANELEC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCCFUBA.BO.Check PANELEC.BO's competition here
BCCFUBA.BO vs CONTAINE.BO Comparison February 2026
BCCFUBA.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCCFUBA.BO stands at 2.5B. In comparison, CONTAINE.BO has a market cap of 95M. Regarding current trading prices, BCCFUBA.BO is priced at ₹164.00, while CONTAINE.BO trades at ₹14.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCCFUBA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 53.31, whereas CONTAINE.BO's P/E ratio is 14.63. In terms of profitability, BCCFUBA.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CONTAINE.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BCCFUBA.BO is less volatile compared to CONTAINE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCCFUBA.BO.Check CONTAINE.BO's competition here
BCCFUBA.BO vs TECHCON.BO Comparison February 2026
BCCFUBA.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCCFUBA.BO stands at 2.5B. In comparison, TECHCON.BO has a market cap of 19.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BCCFUBA.BO is priced at ₹164.00, while TECHCON.BO trades at ₹99.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCCFUBA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 53.31, whereas TECHCON.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCCFUBA.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TECHCON.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BCCFUBA.BO is more volatile compared to TECHCON.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCCFUBA.BO.Check TECHCON.BO's competition here