Bluestone Resources Inc.
Bluestone Resources Inc. BBSRF Peers
See (BBSRF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BBSRF | $0.22 | -0.59% | 33.6M | -5.51 | -$0.04 | N/A |
| BHPLF | $26.79 | +3.33% | 136B | 11.96 | $2.24 | +4.63% |
| CHZQ | $0.00 | -0.00% | 133.2B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| RTNTF | $76.35 | +5.54% | 106.5B | 10.80 | $7.07 | +6.48% |
| RTPPF | $61.66 | +1.35% | 105.3B | 8.72 | $7.07 | +6.52% |
| GLNCY | $8.35 | +2.83% | 50.1B | -32.13 | -$0.26 | +4.12% |
| GLCNF | $4.20 | +2.94% | 49.9B | -32.31 | -$0.13 | +4.29% |
| GMBXF | $6.12 | -0.33% | 47.6B | 12.75 | $0.48 | +3.04% |
| FSUMF | $11.47 | +1.96% | 35.3B | 9.18 | $1.25 | +7.71% |
| FSUGY | $22.57 | +2.82% | 34.7B | 8.93 | $2.53 | +8.01% |
Stock Comparison
BBSRF vs BHPLF Comparison
BBSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BBSRF stands at 33.6M. In comparison, BHPLF has a market cap of 136B. Regarding current trading prices, BBSRF is priced at $0.22, while BHPLF trades at $26.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BBSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.51, whereas BHPLF's P/E ratio is 11.96. In terms of profitability, BBSRF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to BHPLF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, BBSRF is less volatile compared to BHPLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBSRF.
BBSRF vs CHZQ Comparison
BBSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BBSRF stands at 33.6M. In comparison, CHZQ has a market cap of 133.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BBSRF is priced at $0.22, while CHZQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BBSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.51, whereas CHZQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BBSRF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to CHZQ's ROE of +4.40%. Regarding short-term risk, BBSRF is more volatile compared to CHZQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBSRF.
BBSRF vs RTNTF Comparison
BBSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BBSRF stands at 33.6M. In comparison, RTNTF has a market cap of 106.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BBSRF is priced at $0.22, while RTNTF trades at $76.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BBSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.51, whereas RTNTF's P/E ratio is 10.80. In terms of profitability, BBSRF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to RTNTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BBSRF is less volatile compared to RTNTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBSRF.
BBSRF vs RTPPF Comparison
BBSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BBSRF stands at 33.6M. In comparison, RTPPF has a market cap of 105.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BBSRF is priced at $0.22, while RTPPF trades at $61.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BBSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.51, whereas RTPPF's P/E ratio is 8.72. In terms of profitability, BBSRF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to RTPPF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BBSRF is more volatile compared to RTPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBSRF.
BBSRF vs GLNCY Comparison
BBSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BBSRF stands at 33.6M. In comparison, GLNCY has a market cap of 50.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BBSRF is priced at $0.22, while GLNCY trades at $8.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BBSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.51, whereas GLNCY's P/E ratio is -32.13. In terms of profitability, BBSRF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to GLNCY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BBSRF is less volatile compared to GLNCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBSRF.
BBSRF vs GLCNF Comparison
BBSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BBSRF stands at 33.6M. In comparison, GLCNF has a market cap of 49.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BBSRF is priced at $0.22, while GLCNF trades at $4.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BBSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.51, whereas GLCNF's P/E ratio is -32.31. In terms of profitability, BBSRF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to GLCNF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BBSRF is less volatile compared to GLCNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBSRF.
BBSRF vs GMBXF Comparison
BBSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BBSRF stands at 33.6M. In comparison, GMBXF has a market cap of 47.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BBSRF is priced at $0.22, while GMBXF trades at $6.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BBSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.51, whereas GMBXF's P/E ratio is 12.75. In terms of profitability, BBSRF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to GMBXF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BBSRF is less volatile compared to GMBXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBSRF.
BBSRF vs FSUMF Comparison
BBSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BBSRF stands at 33.6M. In comparison, FSUMF has a market cap of 35.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BBSRF is priced at $0.22, while FSUMF trades at $11.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BBSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.51, whereas FSUMF's P/E ratio is 9.18. In terms of profitability, BBSRF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to FSUMF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BBSRF is less volatile compared to FSUMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBSRF.
BBSRF vs FSUGY Comparison
BBSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BBSRF stands at 33.6M. In comparison, FSUGY has a market cap of 34.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BBSRF is priced at $0.22, while FSUGY trades at $22.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BBSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.51, whereas FSUGY's P/E ratio is 8.93. In terms of profitability, BBSRF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to FSUGY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BBSRF is less volatile compared to FSUGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBSRF.
BBSRF vs NGLOY Comparison
BBSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BBSRF stands at 33.6M. In comparison, NGLOY has a market cap of 33.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BBSRF is priced at $0.22, while NGLOY trades at $15.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BBSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.51, whereas NGLOY's P/E ratio is -10.73. In terms of profitability, BBSRF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to NGLOY's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BBSRF is less volatile compared to NGLOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBSRF.
BBSRF vs AAUKF Comparison
BBSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BBSRF stands at 33.6M. In comparison, AAUKF has a market cap of 32.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BBSRF is priced at $0.22, while AAUKF trades at $30.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BBSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.51, whereas AAUKF's P/E ratio is -10.45. In terms of profitability, BBSRF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to AAUKF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BBSRF is more volatile compared to AAUKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBSRF.
BBSRF vs CNSUF Comparison
BBSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BBSRF stands at 33.6M. In comparison, CNSUF has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BBSRF is priced at $0.22, while CNSUF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BBSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.51, whereas CNSUF's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, BBSRF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to CNSUF's ROE of -1.84%. Regarding short-term risk, BBSRF is more volatile compared to CNSUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBSRF.
BBSRF vs CMCLF Comparison
BBSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BBSRF stands at 33.6M. In comparison, CMCLF has a market cap of 25.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BBSRF is priced at $0.22, while CMCLF trades at $1.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BBSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.51, whereas CMCLF's P/E ratio is 10.90. In terms of profitability, BBSRF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to CMCLF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BBSRF is less volatile compared to CMCLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBSRF.
BBSRF vs TCKRF Comparison
BBSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BBSRF stands at 33.6M. In comparison, TCKRF has a market cap of 20.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BBSRF is priced at $0.22, while TCKRF trades at $42.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BBSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.51, whereas TCKRF's P/E ratio is 844.20. In terms of profitability, BBSRF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to TCKRF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BBSRF is more volatile compared to TCKRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBSRF.
BBSRF vs JXMNF Comparison
BBSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BBSRF stands at 33.6M. In comparison, JXMNF has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BBSRF is priced at $0.22, while JXMNF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BBSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.51, whereas JXMNF's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, BBSRF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to JXMNF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BBSRF is more volatile compared to JXMNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBSRF.
BBSRF vs IVPAF Comparison
BBSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BBSRF stands at 33.6M. In comparison, IVPAF has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BBSRF is priced at $0.22, while IVPAF trades at $8.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BBSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.51, whereas IVPAF's P/E ratio is 25.72. In terms of profitability, BBSRF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to IVPAF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BBSRF is less volatile compared to IVPAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBSRF.
BBSRF vs IPOAF Comparison
BBSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BBSRF stands at 33.6M. In comparison, IPOAF has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BBSRF is priced at $0.22, while IPOAF trades at $27.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BBSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.51, whereas IPOAF's P/E ratio is 37.36. In terms of profitability, BBSRF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to IPOAF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BBSRF is less volatile compared to IPOAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBSRF.
BBSRF vs BOLIF Comparison
BBSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BBSRF stands at 33.6M. In comparison, BOLIF has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BBSRF is priced at $0.22, while BOLIF trades at $34.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BBSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.51, whereas BOLIF's P/E ratio is 9.39. In terms of profitability, BBSRF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to BOLIF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BBSRF is more volatile compared to BOLIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBSRF.
BBSRF vs BDNNY Comparison
BBSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BBSRF stands at 33.6M. In comparison, BDNNY has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BBSRF is priced at $0.22, while BDNNY trades at $65.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BBSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.51, whereas BDNNY's P/E ratio is 10.92. In terms of profitability, BBSRF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to BDNNY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BBSRF is less volatile compared to BDNNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBSRF.
BBSRF vs SHTLF Comparison
BBSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BBSRF stands at 33.6M. In comparison, SHTLF has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BBSRF is priced at $0.22, while SHTLF trades at $1.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BBSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.51, whereas SHTLF's P/E ratio is -35.00. In terms of profitability, BBSRF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to SHTLF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BBSRF is more volatile compared to SHTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBSRF.
BBSRF vs ABML Comparison
BBSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BBSRF stands at 33.6M. In comparison, ABML has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BBSRF is priced at $0.22, while ABML trades at $9.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BBSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.51, whereas ABML's P/E ratio is -22.34. In terms of profitability, BBSRF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to ABML's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, BBSRF is less volatile compared to ABML. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBSRF.
BBSRF vs STMNF Comparison
BBSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BBSRF stands at 33.6M. In comparison, STMNF has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BBSRF is priced at $0.22, while STMNF trades at $24.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BBSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.51, whereas STMNF's P/E ratio is 55.95. In terms of profitability, BBSRF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to STMNF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BBSRF is more volatile compared to STMNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBSRF.
BBSRF vs SMMYY Comparison
BBSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BBSRF stands at 33.6M. In comparison, SMMYY has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BBSRF is priced at $0.22, while SMMYY trades at $5.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BBSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.51, whereas SMMYY's P/E ratio is 58.10. In terms of profitability, BBSRF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to SMMYY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BBSRF is less volatile compared to SMMYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBSRF.
BBSRF vs LYSDY Comparison
BBSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BBSRF stands at 33.6M. In comparison, LYSDY has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BBSRF is priced at $0.22, while LYSDY trades at $6.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BBSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.51, whereas LYSDY's P/E ratio is 166.63. In terms of profitability, BBSRF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to LYSDY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BBSRF is less volatile compared to LYSDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBSRF.
BBSRF vs LYSCF Comparison
BBSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BBSRF stands at 33.6M. In comparison, LYSCF has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BBSRF is priced at $0.22, while LYSCF trades at $6.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BBSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.51, whereas LYSCF's P/E ratio is 166.00. In terms of profitability, BBSRF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to LYSCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BBSRF is less volatile compared to LYSCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBSRF.
BBSRF vs PUTKY Comparison
BBSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BBSRF stands at 33.6M. In comparison, PUTKY has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BBSRF is priced at $0.22, while PUTKY trades at $27.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BBSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.51, whereas PUTKY's P/E ratio is 4.80. In terms of profitability, BBSRF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to PUTKY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BBSRF is less volatile compared to PUTKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBSRF.
BBSRF vs PUTKF Comparison
BBSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BBSRF stands at 33.6M. In comparison, PUTKF has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BBSRF is priced at $0.22, while PUTKF trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BBSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.51, whereas PUTKF's P/E ratio is 4.67. In terms of profitability, BBSRF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to PUTKF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BBSRF is more volatile compared to PUTKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBSRF.
BBSRF vs NILSY Comparison
BBSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BBSRF stands at 33.6M. In comparison, NILSY has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BBSRF is priced at $0.22, while NILSY trades at $3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BBSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.51, whereas NILSY's P/E ratio is 0.63. In terms of profitability, BBSRF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to NILSY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BBSRF is more volatile compared to NILSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBSRF.
BBSRF vs PAEKY Comparison
BBSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BBSRF stands at 33.6M. In comparison, PAEKY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BBSRF is priced at $0.22, while PAEKY trades at $17.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BBSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.51, whereas PAEKY's P/E ratio is 12.41. In terms of profitability, BBSRF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to PAEKY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BBSRF is more volatile compared to PAEKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBSRF.
BBSRF vs MALRY Comparison
BBSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BBSRF stands at 33.6M. In comparison, MALRY has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BBSRF is priced at $0.22, while MALRY trades at $19.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BBSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.51, whereas MALRY's P/E ratio is -4.84. In terms of profitability, BBSRF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to MALRY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BBSRF is less volatile compared to MALRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBSRF.
BBSRF vs PILBF Comparison
BBSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BBSRF stands at 33.6M. In comparison, PILBF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BBSRF is priced at $0.22, while PILBF trades at $1.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BBSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.51, whereas PILBF's P/E ratio is -117.00. In terms of profitability, BBSRF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to PILBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BBSRF is less volatile compared to PILBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBSRF.
BBSRF vs FLMMF Comparison
BBSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BBSRF stands at 33.6M. In comparison, FLMMF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, BBSRF is priced at $0.22, while FLMMF trades at $22.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BBSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.51, whereas FLMMF's P/E ratio is -30.63. In terms of profitability, BBSRF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to FLMMF's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BBSRF is less volatile compared to FLMMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBSRF.
BBSRF vs NGXXF Comparison
BBSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BBSRF stands at 33.6M. In comparison, NGXXF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BBSRF is priced at $0.22, while NGXXF trades at $13.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BBSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.51, whereas NGXXF's P/E ratio is -47.23. In terms of profitability, BBSRF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to NGXXF's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, BBSRF is less volatile compared to NGXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBSRF.
BBSRF vs IIDDY Comparison
BBSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BBSRF stands at 33.6M. In comparison, IIDDY has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BBSRF is priced at $0.22, while IIDDY trades at $6.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BBSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.51, whereas IIDDY's P/E ratio is -3.48. In terms of profitability, BBSRF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to IIDDY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BBSRF is more volatile compared to IIDDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBSRF.
BBSRF vs AFBOF Comparison
BBSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BBSRF stands at 33.6M. In comparison, AFBOF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BBSRF is priced at $0.22, while AFBOF trades at $9.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BBSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.51, whereas AFBOF's P/E ratio is 13.24. In terms of profitability, BBSRF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to AFBOF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BBSRF is more volatile compared to AFBOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBSRF.
BBSRF vs IPGDF Comparison
BBSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BBSRF stands at 33.6M. In comparison, IPGDF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BBSRF is priced at $0.22, while IPGDF trades at $3.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BBSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.51, whereas IPGDF's P/E ratio is -3.42. In terms of profitability, BBSRF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to IPGDF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BBSRF is more volatile compared to IPGDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBSRF.
BBSRF vs PWCRF Comparison
BBSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BBSRF stands at 33.6M. In comparison, PWCRF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BBSRF is priced at $0.22, while PWCRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BBSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.51, whereas PWCRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BBSRF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to PWCRF's ROE of -2.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BBSRF is more volatile compared to PWCRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBSRF.
BBSRF vs NICMF Comparison
BBSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BBSRF stands at 33.6M. In comparison, NICMF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BBSRF is priced at $0.22, while NICMF trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BBSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.51, whereas NICMF's P/E ratio is -13.25. In terms of profitability, BBSRF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to NICMF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BBSRF is more volatile compared to NICMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBSRF.
BBSRF vs PTNDY Comparison
BBSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BBSRF stands at 33.6M. In comparison, PTNDY has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BBSRF is priced at $0.22, while PTNDY trades at $10.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BBSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.51, whereas PTNDY's P/E ratio is 27.50. In terms of profitability, BBSRF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to PTNDY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BBSRF is more volatile compared to PTNDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBSRF.
BBSRF vs MIMTF Comparison
BBSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BBSRF stands at 33.6M. In comparison, MIMTF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, BBSRF is priced at $0.22, while MIMTF trades at $15.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BBSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.51, whereas MIMTF's P/E ratio is 8.58. In terms of profitability, BBSRF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to MIMTF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BBSRF is more volatile compared to MIMTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBSRF.
BBSRF vs DWMNF Comparison
BBSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BBSRF stands at 33.6M. In comparison, DWMNF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, BBSRF is priced at $0.22, while DWMNF trades at $33.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BBSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.51, whereas DWMNF's P/E ratio is 10.62. In terms of profitability, BBSRF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to DWMNF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BBSRF is more volatile compared to DWMNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBSRF.
BBSRF vs PTNDF Comparison
BBSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BBSRF stands at 33.6M. In comparison, PTNDF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, BBSRF is priced at $0.22, while PTNDF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BBSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.51, whereas PTNDF's P/E ratio is 19.00. In terms of profitability, BBSRF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to PTNDF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BBSRF is more volatile compared to PTNDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBSRF.
BBSRF vs AZZVF Comparison
BBSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BBSRF stands at 33.6M. In comparison, AZZVF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, BBSRF is priced at $0.22, while AZZVF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BBSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.51, whereas AZZVF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BBSRF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to AZZVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BBSRF is more volatile compared to AZZVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBSRF.
BBSRF vs MALRF Comparison
BBSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BBSRF stands at 33.6M. In comparison, MALRF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BBSRF is priced at $0.22, while MALRF trades at $18.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BBSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.51, whereas MALRF's P/E ratio is -2.31. In terms of profitability, BBSRF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to MALRF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BBSRF is more volatile compared to MALRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBSRF.
BBSRF vs ERMAF Comparison
BBSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BBSRF stands at 33.6M. In comparison, ERMAF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BBSRF is priced at $0.22, while ERMAF trades at $63.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BBSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.51, whereas ERMAF's P/E ratio is 107.74. In terms of profitability, BBSRF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to ERMAF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BBSRF is less volatile compared to ERMAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBSRF.
BBSRF vs CXXMF Comparison
BBSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BBSRF stands at 33.6M. In comparison, CXXMF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BBSRF is priced at $0.22, while CXXMF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BBSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.51, whereas CXXMF's P/E ratio is -3.86. In terms of profitability, BBSRF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to CXXMF's ROE of -1.75%. Regarding short-term risk, BBSRF is more volatile compared to CXXMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBSRF.
BBSRF vs ERMAY Comparison
BBSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BBSRF stands at 33.6M. In comparison, ERMAY has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BBSRF is priced at $0.22, while ERMAY trades at $6.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BBSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.51, whereas ERMAY's P/E ratio is 104.17. In terms of profitability, BBSRF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to ERMAY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BBSRF is less volatile compared to ERMAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBSRF.
BBSRF vs SOUHY Comparison
BBSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BBSRF stands at 33.6M. In comparison, SOUHY has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BBSRF is priced at $0.22, while SOUHY trades at $9.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BBSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.51, whereas SOUHY's P/E ratio is -38.08. In terms of profitability, BBSRF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to SOUHY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BBSRF is less volatile compared to SOUHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBSRF.
BBSRF vs LINRF Comparison
BBSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BBSRF stands at 33.6M. In comparison, LINRF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BBSRF is priced at $0.22, while LINRF trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BBSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.51, whereas LINRF's P/E ratio is -67.68. In terms of profitability, BBSRF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to LINRF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BBSRF is less volatile compared to LINRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBSRF.
BBSRF vs RTRFF Comparison
BBSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BBSRF stands at 33.6M. In comparison, RTRFF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BBSRF is priced at $0.22, while RTRFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BBSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.51, whereas RTRFF's P/E ratio is -30.00. In terms of profitability, BBSRF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to RTRFF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BBSRF is more volatile compared to RTRFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBSRF.
BBSRF vs NCKAF Comparison
BBSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BBSRF stands at 33.6M. In comparison, NCKAF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BBSRF is priced at $0.22, while NCKAF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BBSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.51, whereas NCKAF's P/E ratio is 11.23. In terms of profitability, BBSRF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to NCKAF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BBSRF is more volatile compared to NCKAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBSRF.
BBSRF vs ILKAF Comparison
BBSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BBSRF stands at 33.6M. In comparison, ILKAF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BBSRF is priced at $0.22, while ILKAF trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BBSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.51, whereas ILKAF's P/E ratio is 10.29. In terms of profitability, BBSRF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to ILKAF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BBSRF is less volatile compared to ILKAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBSRF.
BBSRF vs DETRF Comparison
BBSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BBSRF stands at 33.6M. In comparison, DETRF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BBSRF is priced at $0.22, while DETRF trades at $2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BBSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.51, whereas DETRF's P/E ratio is 16.44. In terms of profitability, BBSRF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to DETRF's ROE of +1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, BBSRF is more volatile compared to DETRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBSRF.
BBSRF vs ILKAY Comparison
BBSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BBSRF stands at 33.6M. In comparison, ILKAY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BBSRF is priced at $0.22, while ILKAY trades at $16.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BBSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.51, whereas ILKAY's P/E ratio is 9.59. In terms of profitability, BBSRF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to ILKAY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BBSRF is less volatile compared to ILKAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBSRF.
BBSRF vs ADTLF Comparison
BBSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BBSRF stands at 33.6M. In comparison, ADTLF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BBSRF is priced at $0.22, while ADTLF trades at $3.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BBSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.51, whereas ADTLF's P/E ratio is -13.43. In terms of profitability, BBSRF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to ADTLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BBSRF is more volatile compared to ADTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBSRF.
BBSRF vs ADMLF Comparison
BBSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BBSRF stands at 33.6M. In comparison, ADMLF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BBSRF is priced at $0.22, while ADMLF trades at $3.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BBSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.51, whereas ADMLF's P/E ratio is -13.29. In terms of profitability, BBSRF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to ADMLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BBSRF is less volatile compared to ADMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBSRF.
BBSRF vs AZRMF Comparison
BBSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BBSRF stands at 33.6M. In comparison, AZRMF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BBSRF is priced at $0.22, while AZRMF trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BBSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.51, whereas AZRMF's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, BBSRF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to AZRMF's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, BBSRF is more volatile compared to AZRMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBSRF.
BBSRF vs TAOFF Comparison
BBSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BBSRF stands at 33.6M. In comparison, TAOFF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BBSRF is priced at $0.22, while TAOFF trades at $3.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BBSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.51, whereas TAOFF's P/E ratio is -17.25. In terms of profitability, BBSRF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to TAOFF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BBSRF is more volatile compared to TAOFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBSRF.
BBSRF vs AUSDF Comparison
BBSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BBSRF stands at 33.6M. In comparison, AUSDF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BBSRF is priced at $0.22, while AUSDF trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BBSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.51, whereas AUSDF's P/E ratio is 19.67. In terms of profitability, BBSRF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to AUSDF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BBSRF is more volatile compared to AUSDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBSRF.
BBSRF vs MFRVF Comparison
BBSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BBSRF stands at 33.6M. In comparison, MFRVF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BBSRF is priced at $0.22, while MFRVF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BBSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.51, whereas MFRVF's P/E ratio is -18.00. In terms of profitability, BBSRF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to MFRVF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BBSRF is more volatile compared to MFRVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBSRF.
BBSRF vs STTSY Comparison
BBSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BBSRF stands at 33.6M. In comparison, STTSY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BBSRF is priced at $0.22, while STTSY trades at $20.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BBSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.51, whereas STTSY's P/E ratio is 6.89. In terms of profitability, BBSRF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to STTSY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BBSRF is more volatile compared to STTSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBSRF.
BBSRF vs BQSSF Comparison
BBSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BBSRF stands at 33.6M. In comparison, BQSSF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BBSRF is priced at $0.22, while BQSSF trades at $2.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BBSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.51, whereas BQSSF's P/E ratio is -64.12. In terms of profitability, BBSRF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to BQSSF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BBSRF is less volatile compared to BQSSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBSRF.
BBSRF vs TTNNF Comparison
BBSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BBSRF stands at 33.6M. In comparison, TTNNF has a market cap of 980.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BBSRF is priced at $0.22, while TTNNF trades at $6.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BBSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.51, whereas TTNNF's P/E ratio is 27.56. In terms of profitability, BBSRF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to TTNNF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BBSRF is more volatile compared to TTNNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBSRF.
BBSRF vs AMVMF Comparison
BBSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BBSRF stands at 33.6M. In comparison, AMVMF has a market cap of 930M. Regarding current trading prices, BBSRF is priced at $0.22, while AMVMF trades at $28.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BBSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.51, whereas AMVMF's P/E ratio is -75.84. In terms of profitability, BBSRF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to AMVMF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BBSRF is more volatile compared to AMVMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBSRF.
BBSRF vs ATUSF Comparison
BBSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BBSRF stands at 33.6M. In comparison, ATUSF has a market cap of 926.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BBSRF is priced at $0.22, while ATUSF trades at $20.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BBSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.51, whereas ATUSF's P/E ratio is 12.74. In terms of profitability, BBSRF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to ATUSF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BBSRF is less volatile compared to ATUSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBSRF.
BBSRF vs OSTTF Comparison
BBSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BBSRF stands at 33.6M. In comparison, OSTTF has a market cap of 914.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BBSRF is priced at $0.22, while OSTTF trades at $13.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BBSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.51, whereas OSTTF's P/E ratio is 18.68. In terms of profitability, BBSRF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to OSTTF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BBSRF is more volatile compared to OSTTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBSRF.
BBSRF vs AFMJF Comparison
BBSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BBSRF stands at 33.6M. In comparison, AFMJF has a market cap of 901M. Regarding current trading prices, BBSRF is priced at $0.22, while AFMJF trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BBSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.51, whereas AFMJF's P/E ratio is 8.82. In terms of profitability, BBSRF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to AFMJF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, BBSRF is less volatile compared to AFMJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBSRF.
BBSRF vs ALMTF Comparison
BBSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BBSRF stands at 33.6M. In comparison, ALMTF has a market cap of 870.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BBSRF is priced at $0.22, while ALMTF trades at $4.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BBSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.51, whereas ALMTF's P/E ratio is -23.84. In terms of profitability, BBSRF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to ALMTF's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, BBSRF is less volatile compared to ALMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBSRF.
BBSRF vs FMCXF Comparison
BBSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BBSRF stands at 33.6M. In comparison, FMCXF has a market cap of 860.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BBSRF is priced at $0.22, while FMCXF trades at $2.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BBSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.51, whereas FMCXF's P/E ratio is -50.96. In terms of profitability, BBSRF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to FMCXF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BBSRF is less volatile compared to FMCXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBSRF.
BBSRF vs GERFF Comparison
BBSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BBSRF stands at 33.6M. In comparison, GERFF has a market cap of 838.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BBSRF is priced at $0.22, while GERFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BBSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.51, whereas GERFF's P/E ratio is 0.16. In terms of profitability, BBSRF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to GERFF's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, BBSRF is more volatile compared to GERFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBSRF.
BBSRF vs CREQF Comparison
BBSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BBSRF stands at 33.6M. In comparison, CREQF has a market cap of 725.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BBSRF is priced at $0.22, while CREQF trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BBSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.51, whereas CREQF's P/E ratio is -26.00. In terms of profitability, BBSRF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to CREQF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BBSRF is less volatile compared to CREQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBSRF.
BBSRF vs MJDLF Comparison
BBSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BBSRF stands at 33.6M. In comparison, MJDLF has a market cap of 554.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BBSRF is priced at $0.22, while MJDLF trades at $6.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BBSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.51, whereas MJDLF's P/E ratio is 29.48. In terms of profitability, BBSRF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to MJDLF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BBSRF is less volatile compared to MJDLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBSRF.
BBSRF vs VULNF Comparison
BBSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BBSRF stands at 33.6M. In comparison, VULNF has a market cap of 546.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BBSRF is priced at $0.22, while VULNF trades at $2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BBSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.51, whereas VULNF's P/E ratio is -9.26. In terms of profitability, BBSRF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to VULNF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BBSRF is more volatile compared to VULNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBSRF.
BBSRF vs REEMF Comparison
BBSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BBSRF stands at 33.6M. In comparison, REEMF has a market cap of 531.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BBSRF is priced at $0.22, while REEMF trades at $0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BBSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.51, whereas REEMF's P/E ratio is -34.33. In terms of profitability, BBSRF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to REEMF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, BBSRF is less volatile compared to REEMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBSRF.
BBSRF vs BIRNF Comparison
BBSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BBSRF stands at 33.6M. In comparison, BIRNF has a market cap of 519.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BBSRF is priced at $0.22, while BIRNF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BBSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.51, whereas BIRNF's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, BBSRF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to BIRNF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BBSRF is more volatile compared to BIRNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBSRF.
BBSRF vs PMETF Comparison
BBSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BBSRF stands at 33.6M. In comparison, PMETF has a market cap of 496.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BBSRF is priced at $0.22, while PMETF trades at $3.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BBSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.51, whereas PMETF's P/E ratio is -102.00. In terms of profitability, BBSRF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to PMETF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BBSRF is less volatile compared to PMETF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBSRF.
BBSRF vs MNXMF Comparison
BBSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BBSRF stands at 33.6M. In comparison, MNXMF has a market cap of 492.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BBSRF is priced at $0.22, while MNXMF trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BBSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.51, whereas MNXMF's P/E ratio is -76.65. In terms of profitability, BBSRF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to MNXMF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BBSRF is less volatile compared to MNXMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBSRF.
BBSRF vs CGMLF Comparison
BBSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BBSRF stands at 33.6M. In comparison, CGMLF has a market cap of 466.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BBSRF is priced at $0.22, while CGMLF trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BBSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.51, whereas CGMLF's P/E ratio is -30.00. In terms of profitability, BBSRF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to CGMLF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BBSRF is less volatile compared to CGMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBSRF.
BBSRF vs MCRZF Comparison
BBSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BBSRF stands at 33.6M. In comparison, MCRZF has a market cap of 466.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BBSRF is priced at $0.22, while MCRZF trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BBSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.51, whereas MCRZF's P/E ratio is -12.29. In terms of profitability, BBSRF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to MCRZF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BBSRF is less volatile compared to MCRZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBSRF.
BBSRF vs FGOVF Comparison
BBSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BBSRF stands at 33.6M. In comparison, FGOVF has a market cap of 456.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BBSRF is priced at $0.22, while FGOVF trades at $0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BBSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.51, whereas FGOVF's P/E ratio is -86.25. In terms of profitability, BBSRF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to FGOVF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BBSRF is less volatile compared to FGOVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBSRF.
BBSRF vs MCHHF Comparison
BBSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BBSRF stands at 33.6M. In comparison, MCHHF has a market cap of 444M. Regarding current trading prices, BBSRF is priced at $0.22, while MCHHF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BBSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.51, whereas MCHHF's P/E ratio is 21.03. In terms of profitability, BBSRF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to MCHHF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BBSRF is more volatile compared to MCHHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBSRF.
BBSRF vs VTMLF Comparison
BBSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BBSRF stands at 33.6M. In comparison, VTMLF has a market cap of 429.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BBSRF is priced at $0.22, while VTMLF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BBSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.51, whereas VTMLF's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, BBSRF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to VTMLF's ROE of -4.60%. Regarding short-term risk, BBSRF is more volatile compared to VTMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBSRF.
BBSRF vs PXMFF Comparison
BBSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BBSRF stands at 33.6M. In comparison, PXMFF has a market cap of 422.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BBSRF is priced at $0.22, while PXMFF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BBSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.51, whereas PXMFF's P/E ratio is 3.66. In terms of profitability, BBSRF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to PXMFF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BBSRF is more volatile compared to PXMFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBSRF.
BBSRF vs ARAFF Comparison
BBSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BBSRF stands at 33.6M. In comparison, ARAFF has a market cap of 412.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BBSRF is priced at $0.22, while ARAFF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BBSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.51, whereas ARAFF's P/E ratio is -16.75. In terms of profitability, BBSRF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to ARAFF's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, BBSRF is less volatile compared to ARAFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBSRF.
BBSRF vs FWEDF Comparison
BBSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BBSRF stands at 33.6M. In comparison, FWEDF has a market cap of 399.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BBSRF is priced at $0.22, while FWEDF trades at $1.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BBSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.51, whereas FWEDF's P/E ratio is -12.73. In terms of profitability, BBSRF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to FWEDF's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, BBSRF is less volatile compared to FWEDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBSRF.
BBSRF vs KMRPF Comparison
BBSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BBSRF stands at 33.6M. In comparison, KMRPF has a market cap of 398M. Regarding current trading prices, BBSRF is priced at $0.22, while KMRPF trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BBSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.51, whereas KMRPF's P/E ratio is 6.34. In terms of profitability, BBSRF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to KMRPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BBSRF is less volatile compared to KMRPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBSRF.
BBSRF vs BELMF Comparison
BBSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BBSRF stands at 33.6M. In comparison, BELMF has a market cap of 387.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BBSRF is priced at $0.22, while BELMF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BBSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.51, whereas BELMF's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, BBSRF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to BELMF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, BBSRF is more volatile compared to BELMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBSRF.
BBSRF vs NQMIY Comparison
BBSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BBSRF stands at 33.6M. In comparison, NQMIY has a market cap of 380.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BBSRF is priced at $0.22, while NQMIY trades at $70.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BBSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.51, whereas NQMIY's P/E ratio is -4.80. In terms of profitability, BBSRF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to NQMIY's ROE of +0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, BBSRF is more volatile compared to NQMIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBSRF.
BBSRF vs ERLFF Comparison
BBSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BBSRF stands at 33.6M. In comparison, ERLFF has a market cap of 377.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BBSRF is priced at $0.22, while ERLFF trades at $1.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BBSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.51, whereas ERLFF's P/E ratio is -36.42. In terms of profitability, BBSRF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to ERLFF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BBSRF is less volatile compared to ERLFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBSRF.
BBSRF vs MLXEF Comparison
BBSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BBSRF stands at 33.6M. In comparison, MLXEF has a market cap of 376.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BBSRF is priced at $0.22, while MLXEF trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BBSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.51, whereas MLXEF's P/E ratio is 6.07. In terms of profitability, BBSRF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to MLXEF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BBSRF is less volatile compared to MLXEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBSRF.
BBSRF vs MLYF Comparison
BBSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BBSRF stands at 33.6M. In comparison, MLYF has a market cap of 374.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BBSRF is priced at $0.22, while MLYF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BBSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.51, whereas MLYF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, BBSRF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to MLYF's ROE of +5.32%. Regarding short-term risk, BBSRF is less volatile compared to MLYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBSRF.
BBSRF vs SRHYY Comparison
BBSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BBSRF stands at 33.6M. In comparison, SRHYY has a market cap of 364.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BBSRF is priced at $0.22, while SRHYY trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BBSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.51, whereas SRHYY's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, BBSRF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to SRHYY's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, BBSRF is less volatile compared to SRHYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBSRF.
BBSRF vs WYCC Comparison
BBSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BBSRF stands at 33.6M. In comparison, WYCC has a market cap of 359.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BBSRF is priced at $0.22, while WYCC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BBSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.51, whereas WYCC's P/E ratio is -1.46. In terms of profitability, BBSRF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to WYCC's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BBSRF is more volatile compared to WYCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBSRF.
BBSRF vs CTJHY Comparison
BBSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BBSRF stands at 33.6M. In comparison, CTJHY has a market cap of 351.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BBSRF is priced at $0.22, while CTJHY trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BBSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.51, whereas CTJHY's P/E ratio is 4.81. In terms of profitability, BBSRF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to CTJHY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BBSRF is more volatile compared to CTJHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBSRF.
BBSRF vs SVMLF Comparison
BBSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BBSRF stands at 33.6M. In comparison, SVMLF has a market cap of 323.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BBSRF is priced at $0.22, while SVMLF trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BBSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.51, whereas SVMLF's P/E ratio is -12.50. In terms of profitability, BBSRF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to SVMLF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, BBSRF is less volatile compared to SVMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBSRF.
BBSRF vs MLYCF Comparison
BBSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BBSRF stands at 33.6M. In comparison, MLYCF has a market cap of 320.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BBSRF is priced at $0.22, while MLYCF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BBSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.51, whereas MLYCF's P/E ratio is 1.50. In terms of profitability, BBSRF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to MLYCF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BBSRF is more volatile compared to MLYCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBSRF.
BBSRF vs SYAAF Comparison
BBSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BBSRF stands at 33.6M. In comparison, SYAAF has a market cap of 309.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BBSRF is priced at $0.22, while SYAAF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BBSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.51, whereas SYAAF's P/E ratio is -2.12. In terms of profitability, BBSRF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to SYAAF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, BBSRF is less volatile compared to SYAAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBSRF.
BBSRF vs LTSRF Comparison
BBSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BBSRF stands at 33.6M. In comparison, LTSRF has a market cap of 296.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BBSRF is priced at $0.22, while LTSRF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BBSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.51, whereas LTSRF's P/E ratio is -12.50. In terms of profitability, BBSRF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to LTSRF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BBSRF is less volatile compared to LTSRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBSRF.
BBSRF vs SLGGF Comparison
BBSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BBSRF stands at 33.6M. In comparison, SLGGF has a market cap of 295.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BBSRF is priced at $0.22, while SLGGF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BBSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.51, whereas SLGGF's P/E ratio is -9.84. In terms of profitability, BBSRF's ROE is -0.28%, compared to SLGGF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BBSRF is less volatile compared to SLGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBSRF.