Burberry Group plc

BBRYF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BBRYF stands at 3.60B. In comparison, HESAY has a market cap of 296.44B. Regarding current trading prices, BBRYF is priced at $10.05, while HESAY trades at $282.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BBRYF currently has a P/E ratio of 71.79, whereas HESAY's P/E ratio is 57.01. In terms of profitability, BBRYF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HESAY's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, BBRYF is more volatile compared to HESAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBRYF.

BBRYF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BBRYF stands at 3.60B. In comparison, HESAF has a market cap of 292.50B. Regarding current trading prices, BBRYF is priced at $10.05, while HESAF trades at $2,790.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BBRYF currently has a P/E ratio of 71.79, whereas HESAF's P/E ratio is 56.06. In terms of profitability, BBRYF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HESAF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, BBRYF is more volatile compared to HESAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBRYF.

BBRYF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BBRYF stands at 3.60B. In comparison, LVMHF has a market cap of 278.04B. Regarding current trading prices, BBRYF is priced at $10.05, while LVMHF trades at $557.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BBRYF currently has a P/E ratio of 71.79, whereas LVMHF's P/E ratio is 19.59. In terms of profitability, BBRYF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LVMHF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BBRYF is more volatile compared to LVMHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBRYF.

BBRYF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BBRYF stands at 3.60B. In comparison, LVMUY has a market cap of 277.29B. Regarding current trading prices, BBRYF is priced at $10.05, while LVMUY trades at $111.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BBRYF currently has a P/E ratio of 71.79, whereas LVMUY's P/E ratio is 19.53. In terms of profitability, BBRYF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LVMUY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BBRYF is more volatile compared to LVMUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBRYF.

BBRYF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BBRYF stands at 3.60B. In comparison, CFRHF has a market cap of 103.86B. Regarding current trading prices, BBRYF is priced at $10.05, while CFRHF trades at $177.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BBRYF currently has a P/E ratio of 71.79, whereas CFRHF's P/E ratio is 27.01. In terms of profitability, BBRYF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CFRHF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BBRYF is more volatile compared to CFRHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBRYF.

BBRYF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BBRYF stands at 3.60B. In comparison, CFRUY has a market cap of 103.14B. Regarding current trading prices, BBRYF is priced at $10.05, while CFRUY trades at $17.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BBRYF currently has a P/E ratio of 71.79, whereas CFRUY's P/E ratio is 26.76. In terms of profitability, BBRYF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CFRUY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BBRYF is more volatile compared to CFRUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBRYF.

BBRYF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BBRYF stands at 3.60B. In comparison, CHDRY has a market cap of 95.08B. Regarding current trading prices, BBRYF is priced at $10.05, while CHDRY trades at $131.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BBRYF currently has a P/E ratio of 71.79, whereas CHDRY's P/E ratio is 16.13. In terms of profitability, BBRYF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CHDRY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BBRYF is less volatile compared to CHDRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBRYF.

BBRYF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BBRYF stands at 3.60B. In comparison, CHDRF has a market cap of 90.98B. Regarding current trading prices, BBRYF is priced at $10.05, while CHDRF trades at $504.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BBRYF currently has a P/E ratio of 71.79, whereas CHDRF's P/E ratio is 15.43. In terms of profitability, BBRYF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CHDRF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, BBRYF is more volatile compared to CHDRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBRYF.

BBRYF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BBRYF stands at 3.60B. In comparison, PPRUY has a market cap of 24.46B. Regarding current trading prices, BBRYF is priced at $10.05, while PPRUY trades at $19.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BBRYF currently has a P/E ratio of 71.79, whereas PPRUY's P/E ratio is 19.00. In terms of profitability, BBRYF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PPRUY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BBRYF is more volatile compared to PPRUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBRYF.

BBRYF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BBRYF stands at 3.60B. In comparison, PPRUF has a market cap of 23.94B. Regarding current trading prices, BBRYF is priced at $10.05, while PPRUF trades at $195.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BBRYF currently has a P/E ratio of 71.79, whereas PPRUF's P/E ratio is 18.67. In terms of profitability, BBRYF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PPRUF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BBRYF is more volatile compared to PPRUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBRYF.

BBRYF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BBRYF stands at 3.60B. In comparison, PRDSY has a market cap of 16.70B. Regarding current trading prices, BBRYF is priced at $10.05, while PRDSY trades at $13.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BBRYF currently has a P/E ratio of 71.79, whereas PRDSY's P/E ratio is 17.64. In terms of profitability, BBRYF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PRDSY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BBRYF is more volatile compared to PRDSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBRYF.

BBRYF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BBRYF stands at 3.60B. In comparison, PRDSF has a market cap of 15.92B. Regarding current trading prices, BBRYF is priced at $10.05, while PRDSF trades at $6.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BBRYF currently has a P/E ratio of 71.79, whereas PRDSF's P/E ratio is 16.81. In terms of profitability, BBRYF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PRDSF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BBRYF is more volatile compared to PRDSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBRYF.

BBRYF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BBRYF stands at 3.60B. In comparison, TPR has a market cap of 15.17B. Regarding current trading prices, BBRYF is priced at $10.05, while TPR trades at $73.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BBRYF currently has a P/E ratio of 71.79, whereas TPR's P/E ratio is 21.31. In terms of profitability, BBRYF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TPR's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, BBRYF is more volatile compared to TPR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBRYF.

BBRYF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BBRYF stands at 3.60B. In comparison, CJEWY has a market cap of 13.33B. Regarding current trading prices, BBRYF is priced at $10.05, while CJEWY trades at $13.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BBRYF currently has a P/E ratio of 71.79, whereas CJEWY's P/E ratio is 23.02. In terms of profitability, BBRYF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CJEWY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BBRYF is more volatile compared to CJEWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBRYF.

BBRYF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BBRYF stands at 3.60B. In comparison, CJEWF has a market cap of 11.99B. Regarding current trading prices, BBRYF is priced at $10.05, while CJEWF trades at $1.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BBRYF currently has a P/E ratio of 71.79, whereas CJEWF's P/E ratio is 20.00. In terms of profitability, BBRYF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CJEWF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BBRYF is less volatile compared to CJEWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBRYF.

BBRYF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BBRYF stands at 3.60B. In comparison, PNDZF has a market cap of 11.51B. Regarding current trading prices, BBRYF is priced at $10.05, while PNDZF trades at $151.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BBRYF currently has a P/E ratio of 71.79, whereas PNDZF's P/E ratio is 15.49. In terms of profitability, BBRYF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PNDZF's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BBRYF is more volatile compared to PNDZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBRYF.

BBRYF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BBRYF stands at 3.60B. In comparison, SWGAF has a market cap of 8.95B. Regarding current trading prices, BBRYF is priced at $10.05, while SWGAF trades at $173.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BBRYF currently has a P/E ratio of 71.79, whereas SWGAF's P/E ratio is 38.11. In terms of profitability, BBRYF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SWGAF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BBRYF is more volatile compared to SWGAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBRYF.

BBRYF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BBRYF stands at 3.60B. In comparison, SWGNF has a market cap of 8.93B. Regarding current trading prices, BBRYF is priced at $10.05, while SWGNF trades at $34.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BBRYF currently has a P/E ratio of 71.79, whereas SWGNF's P/E ratio is 38.14. In terms of profitability, BBRYF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SWGNF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BBRYF is less volatile compared to SWGNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBRYF.

BBRYF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BBRYF stands at 3.60B. In comparison, SWGAY has a market cap of 8.73B. Regarding current trading prices, BBRYF is priced at $10.05, while SWGAY trades at $8.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BBRYF currently has a P/E ratio of 71.79, whereas SWGAY's P/E ratio is 36.57. In terms of profitability, BBRYF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SWGAY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BBRYF is more volatile compared to SWGAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBRYF.

BBRYF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BBRYF stands at 3.60B. In comparison, BCUCY has a market cap of 7.90B. Regarding current trading prices, BBRYF is priced at $10.05, while BCUCY trades at $11.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BBRYF currently has a P/E ratio of 71.79, whereas BCUCY's P/E ratio is 58.20. In terms of profitability, BBRYF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BCUCY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, BBRYF is more volatile compared to BCUCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBRYF.

BBRYF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BBRYF stands at 3.60B. In comparison, BURBY has a market cap of 3.48B. Regarding current trading prices, BBRYF is priced at $10.05, while BURBY trades at $9.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BBRYF currently has a P/E ratio of 71.79, whereas BURBY's P/E ratio is 69.50. In terms of profitability, BBRYF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BURBY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BBRYF is more volatile compared to BURBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBRYF.

BBRYF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BBRYF stands at 3.60B. In comparison, SIG has a market cap of 2.15B. Regarding current trading prices, BBRYF is priced at $10.05, while SIG trades at $49.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BBRYF currently has a P/E ratio of 71.79, whereas SIG's P/E ratio is 5.77. In terms of profitability, BBRYF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SIG's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BBRYF is more volatile compared to SIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBRYF.

BBRYF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BBRYF stands at 3.60B. In comparison, CPRI has a market cap of 1.82B. Regarding current trading prices, BBRYF is priced at $10.05, while CPRI trades at $15.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BBRYF currently has a P/E ratio of 71.79, whereas CPRI's P/E ratio is -1.80. In terms of profitability, BBRYF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CPRI's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, BBRYF is more volatile compared to CPRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBRYF.

BBRYF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BBRYF stands at 3.60B. In comparison, PANDY has a market cap of 1.80B. Regarding current trading prices, BBRYF is priced at $10.05, while PANDY trades at $21.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BBRYF currently has a P/E ratio of 71.79, whereas PANDY's P/E ratio is 10.75. In terms of profitability, BBRYF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PANDY's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BBRYF is less volatile compared to PANDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBRYF.

BBRYF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BBRYF stands at 3.60B. In comparison, LKFLF has a market cap of 1.41B. Regarding current trading prices, BBRYF is priced at $10.05, while LKFLF trades at $2.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BBRYF currently has a P/E ratio of 71.79, whereas LKFLF's P/E ratio is 8.57. In terms of profitability, BBRYF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LKFLF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BBRYF is more volatile compared to LKFLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBRYF.

BBRYF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BBRYF stands at 3.60B. In comparison, WOSGF has a market cap of 1.13B. Regarding current trading prices, BBRYF is priced at $10.05, while WOSGF trades at $4.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BBRYF currently has a P/E ratio of 71.79, whereas WOSGF's P/E ratio is 21.00. In terms of profitability, BBRYF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to WOSGF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BBRYF is more volatile compared to WOSGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBRYF.

BBRYF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BBRYF stands at 3.60B. In comparison, SFRGF has a market cap of 1.10B. Regarding current trading prices, BBRYF is priced at $10.05, while SFRGF trades at $6.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BBRYF currently has a P/E ratio of 71.79, whereas SFRGF's P/E ratio is -14.15. In terms of profitability, BBRYF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SFRGF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BBRYF is less volatile compared to SFRGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBRYF.

BBRYF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BBRYF stands at 3.60B. In comparison, MYTE has a market cap of 1.04B. Regarding current trading prices, BBRYF is priced at $10.05, while MYTE trades at $7.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BBRYF currently has a P/E ratio of 71.79, whereas MYTE's P/E ratio is -16.61. In terms of profitability, BBRYF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MYTE's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BBRYF is more volatile compared to MYTE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBRYF.

BBRYF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BBRYF stands at 3.60B. In comparison, SFRGY has a market cap of 1.03B. Regarding current trading prices, BBRYF is priced at $10.05, while SFRGY trades at $3.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BBRYF currently has a P/E ratio of 71.79, whereas SFRGY's P/E ratio is -13.48. In terms of profitability, BBRYF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SFRGY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BBRYF is more volatile compared to SFRGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBRYF.

BBRYF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BBRYF stands at 3.60B. In comparison, REAL has a market cap of 715.32M. Regarding current trading prices, BBRYF is priced at $10.05, while REAL trades at $6.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BBRYF currently has a P/E ratio of 71.79, whereas REAL's P/E ratio is -5.19. In terms of profitability, BBRYF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to REAL's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, BBRYF is less volatile compared to REAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBRYF.

BBRYF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BBRYF stands at 3.60B. In comparison, CHOWF has a market cap of 591.99M. Regarding current trading prices, BBRYF is priced at $10.05, while CHOWF trades at $0.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BBRYF currently has a P/E ratio of 71.79, whereas CHOWF's P/E ratio is 5.87. In terms of profitability, BBRYF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CHOWF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BBRYF is less volatile compared to CHOWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBRYF.

BBRYF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BBRYF stands at 3.60B. In comparison, CTTLF has a market cap of 365.68M. Regarding current trading prices, BBRYF is priced at $10.05, while CTTLF trades at $0.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BBRYF currently has a P/E ratio of 71.79, whereas CTTLF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BBRYF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CTTLF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, BBRYF is more volatile compared to CTTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBRYF.

BBRYF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BBRYF stands at 3.60B. In comparison, LANV has a market cap of 300.19M. Regarding current trading prices, BBRYF is priced at $10.05, while LANV trades at $2.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BBRYF currently has a P/E ratio of 71.79, whereas LANV's P/E ratio is -1.29. In terms of profitability, BBRYF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LANV's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, BBRYF is less volatile compared to LANV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBRYF.

BBRYF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BBRYF stands at 3.60B. In comparison, ZAPNF has a market cap of 254.50M. Regarding current trading prices, BBRYF is priced at $10.05, while ZAPNF trades at $39.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BBRYF currently has a P/E ratio of 71.79, whereas ZAPNF's P/E ratio is 25.27. In terms of profitability, BBRYF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ZAPNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BBRYF is more volatile compared to ZAPNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBRYF.

BBRYF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BBRYF stands at 3.60B. In comparison, ORWHF has a market cap of 248.55M. Regarding current trading prices, BBRYF is priced at $10.05, while ORWHF trades at $0.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BBRYF currently has a P/E ratio of 71.79, whereas ORWHF's P/E ratio is 8.50. In terms of profitability, BBRYF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ORWHF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BBRYF is more volatile compared to ORWHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBRYF.

BBRYF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BBRYF stands at 3.60B. In comparison, MOV has a market cap of 224.69M. Regarding current trading prices, BBRYF is priced at $10.05, while MOV trades at $14.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BBRYF currently has a P/E ratio of 71.79, whereas MOV's P/E ratio is 17.58. In terms of profitability, BBRYF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MOV's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BBRYF is more volatile compared to MOV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBRYF.

BBRYF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BBRYF stands at 3.60B. In comparison, DCOHF has a market cap of 216.19M. Regarding current trading prices, BBRYF is priced at $10.05, while DCOHF trades at $0.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BBRYF currently has a P/E ratio of 71.79, whereas DCOHF's P/E ratio is 6.22. In terms of profitability, BBRYF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DCOHF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BBRYF is more volatile compared to DCOHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBRYF.

BBRYF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BBRYF stands at 3.60B. In comparison, TSSJF has a market cap of 195.34M. Regarding current trading prices, BBRYF is priced at $10.05, while TSSJF trades at $12.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BBRYF currently has a P/E ratio of 71.79, whereas TSSJF's P/E ratio is 26.60. In terms of profitability, BBRYF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TSSJF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BBRYF is more volatile compared to TSSJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBRYF.

BBRYF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BBRYF stands at 3.60B. In comparison, ELA has a market cap of 181.17M. Regarding current trading prices, BBRYF is priced at $10.05, while ELA trades at $6.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BBRYF currently has a P/E ratio of 71.79, whereas ELA's P/E ratio is 26.81. In terms of profitability, BBRYF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ELA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BBRYF is more volatile compared to ELA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBRYF.

BBRYF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BBRYF stands at 3.60B. In comparison, BRLT has a market cap of 154.95M. Regarding current trading prices, BBRYF is priced at $10.05, while BRLT trades at $1.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BBRYF currently has a P/E ratio of 71.79, whereas BRLT's P/E ratio is 52.00. In terms of profitability, BBRYF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BRLT's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, BBRYF is more volatile compared to BRLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBRYF.

BBRYF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BBRYF stands at 3.60B. In comparison, FLLIY has a market cap of 139.29M. Regarding current trading prices, BBRYF is priced at $10.05, while FLLIY trades at $2.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BBRYF currently has a P/E ratio of 71.79, whereas FLLIY's P/E ratio is -0.54. In terms of profitability, BBRYF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FLLIY's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, BBRYF is less volatile compared to FLLIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBRYF.

BBRYF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BBRYF stands at 3.60B. In comparison, EPRJF has a market cap of 108.85M. Regarding current trading prices, BBRYF is priced at $10.05, while EPRJF trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BBRYF currently has a P/E ratio of 71.79, whereas EPRJF's P/E ratio is 1.50. In terms of profitability, BBRYF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to EPRJF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BBRYF is less volatile compared to EPRJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBRYF.

BBRYF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BBRYF stands at 3.60B. In comparison, HENGF has a market cap of 100.41M. Regarding current trading prices, BBRYF is priced at $10.05, while HENGF trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BBRYF currently has a P/E ratio of 71.79, whereas HENGF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BBRYF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HENGF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BBRYF is more volatile compared to HENGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBRYF.

BBRYF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BBRYF stands at 3.60B. In comparison, CEBTF has a market cap of 78.33M. Regarding current trading prices, BBRYF is priced at $10.05, while CEBTF trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BBRYF currently has a P/E ratio of 71.79, whereas CEBTF's P/E ratio is -1.80. In terms of profitability, BBRYF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CEBTF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BBRYF is less volatile compared to CEBTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBRYF.

BBRYF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BBRYF stands at 3.60B. In comparison, TOPW has a market cap of 74.34M. Regarding current trading prices, BBRYF is priced at $10.05, while TOPW trades at $2.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BBRYF currently has a P/E ratio of 71.79, whereas TOPW's P/E ratio is -299.00. In terms of profitability, BBRYF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TOPW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BBRYF is less volatile compared to TOPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBRYF.

BBRYF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BBRYF stands at 3.60B. In comparison, FOSL has a market cap of 63.27M. Regarding current trading prices, BBRYF is priced at $10.05, while FOSL trades at $1.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BBRYF currently has a P/E ratio of 71.79, whereas FOSL's P/E ratio is -0.61. In terms of profitability, BBRYF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FOSL's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, BBRYF is less volatile compared to FOSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBRYF.

BBRYF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BBRYF stands at 3.60B. In comparison, MNNGF has a market cap of 61.79M. Regarding current trading prices, BBRYF is priced at $10.05, while MNNGF trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BBRYF currently has a P/E ratio of 71.79, whereas MNNGF's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, BBRYF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MNNGF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BBRYF is less volatile compared to MNNGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBRYF.

BBRYF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BBRYF stands at 3.60B. In comparison, FOSLL has a market cap of 57.66M. Regarding current trading prices, BBRYF is priced at $10.05, while FOSLL trades at $14.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BBRYF currently has a P/E ratio of 71.79, whereas FOSLL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BBRYF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FOSLL's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, BBRYF is more volatile compared to FOSLL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBRYF.

BBRYF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BBRYF stands at 3.60B. In comparison, MENEF has a market cap of 26.68M. Regarding current trading prices, BBRYF is priced at $10.05, while MENEF trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BBRYF currently has a P/E ratio of 71.79, whereas MENEF's P/E ratio is -10.25. In terms of profitability, BBRYF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MENEF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BBRYF is more volatile compared to MENEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBRYF.

BBRYF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BBRYF stands at 3.60B. In comparison, BGI has a market cap of 17.19M. Regarding current trading prices, BBRYF is priced at $10.05, while BGI trades at $0.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BBRYF currently has a P/E ratio of 71.79, whereas BGI's P/E ratio is -3.87. In terms of profitability, BBRYF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BGI's ROE of +0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, BBRYF is less volatile compared to BGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBRYF.

BBRYF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BBRYF stands at 3.60B. In comparison, MDNL has a market cap of 10.49M. Regarding current trading prices, BBRYF is priced at $10.05, while MDNL trades at $1.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BBRYF currently has a P/E ratio of 71.79, whereas MDNL's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, BBRYF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MDNL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BBRYF is more volatile compared to MDNL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBRYF.

BBRYF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BBRYF stands at 3.60B. In comparison, MAJJ has a market cap of 5.21M. Regarding current trading prices, BBRYF is priced at $10.05, while MAJJ trades at $1,800.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BBRYF currently has a P/E ratio of 71.79, whereas MAJJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BBRYF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MAJJ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BBRYF is more volatile compared to MAJJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBRYF.

BBRYF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BBRYF stands at 3.60B. In comparison, BANI has a market cap of 4.08M. Regarding current trading prices, BBRYF is priced at $10.05, while BANI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BBRYF currently has a P/E ratio of 71.79, whereas BANI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BBRYF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BANI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BBRYF is more volatile compared to BANI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBRYF.

BBRYF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BBRYF stands at 3.60B. In comparison, EATR has a market cap of 2.63M. Regarding current trading prices, BBRYF is priced at $10.05, while EATR trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BBRYF currently has a P/E ratio of 71.79, whereas EATR's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, BBRYF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to EATR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BBRYF is less volatile compared to EATR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBRYF.

BBRYF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BBRYF stands at 3.60B. In comparison, HENGY has a market cap of 2.61M. Regarding current trading prices, BBRYF is priced at $10.05, while HENGY trades at $0.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BBRYF currently has a P/E ratio of 71.79, whereas HENGY's P/E ratio is -7.40. In terms of profitability, BBRYF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HENGY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BBRYF is more volatile compared to HENGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBRYF.

BBRYF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BBRYF stands at 3.60B. In comparison, SSOK has a market cap of 572824.00. Regarding current trading prices, BBRYF is priced at $10.05, while SSOK trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BBRYF currently has a P/E ratio of 71.79, whereas SSOK's P/E ratio is 0.67. In terms of profitability, BBRYF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SSOK's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, BBRYF is more volatile compared to SSOK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBRYF.

BBRYF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BBRYF stands at 3.60B. In comparison, BRGO has a market cap of 289833.00. Regarding current trading prices, BBRYF is priced at $10.05, while BRGO trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BBRYF currently has a P/E ratio of 71.79, whereas BRGO's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, BBRYF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BRGO's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, BBRYF is more volatile compared to BRGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBRYF.

BBRYF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BBRYF stands at 3.60B. In comparison, CTHR has a market cap of 234494.00. Regarding current trading prices, BBRYF is priced at $10.05, while CTHR trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BBRYF currently has a P/E ratio of 71.79, whereas CTHR's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, BBRYF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CTHR's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, BBRYF is less volatile compared to CTHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBRYF.

BBRYF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BBRYF stands at 3.60B. In comparison, AVEW has a market cap of 125001.00. Regarding current trading prices, BBRYF is priced at $10.05, while AVEW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BBRYF currently has a P/E ratio of 71.79, whereas AVEW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, BBRYF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AVEW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BBRYF is less volatile compared to AVEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBRYF.

BBRYF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BBRYF stands at 3.60B. In comparison, MASN has a market cap of 109034.00. Regarding current trading prices, BBRYF is priced at $10.05, while MASN trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BBRYF currently has a P/E ratio of 71.79, whereas MASN's P/E ratio is 0.04. In terms of profitability, BBRYF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MASN's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BBRYF is less volatile compared to MASN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBRYF.

BBRYF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BBRYF stands at 3.60B. In comparison, BRGOD has a market cap of 78066.00. Regarding current trading prices, BBRYF is priced at $10.05, while BRGOD trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BBRYF currently has a P/E ratio of 71.79, whereas BRGOD's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, BBRYF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BRGOD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BBRYF is more volatile compared to BRGOD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBRYF.

BBRYF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BBRYF stands at 3.60B. In comparison, JEWL has a market cap of 38048.00. Regarding current trading prices, BBRYF is priced at $10.05, while JEWL trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BBRYF currently has a P/E ratio of 71.79, whereas JEWL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BBRYF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to JEWL's ROE of +29.67%. Regarding short-term risk, BBRYF is less volatile compared to JEWL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BBRYF.

BBRYF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BBRYF stands at 3.60B. In comparison, FMFC comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, BBRYF is priced at $10.05, while FMFC trades at N/A.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BBRYF currently has a P/E ratio of 71.79, whereas FMFC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BBRYF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FMFC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. BBRYF has daily volatility of 8.40 and FMFC has daily volatility of N/A.