Basanite, Inc.
Basanite, Inc. (BASA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (BASA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Construction Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BASA | $0.03 | +7.14% | 7.8M | -1.01 | -$0.03 | N/A |
| HCMLY | $16.02 | +0.38% | 44.7B | 11.44 | $1.40 | +4.32% |
| HCMLF | $78.31 | +0.00% | 42.2B | 11.09 | $7.06 | +4.75% |
| HLBZF | $226.73 | -4.54% | 40.4B | 18.91 | $11.99 | +1.64% |
| CRHCF | $53.56 | -0.81% | 38.1B | 13.91 | $3.85 | +1.47% |
| UCLQF | $103.00 | +0.00% | 30.3B | 35.15 | $2.93 | +0.87% |
| GRSXY | $19.61 | +0.00% | 21.6B | 15.20 | $1.29 | +1.28% |
| AHCHF | $2.89 | +0.00% | 16.8B | 13.76 | $0.21 | +3.39% |
| AHCHY | $14.36 | -0.21% | 16.7B | 13.55 | $1.06 | +3.27% |
| JHIUF | $27.36 | +0.00% | 15.8B | 27.92 | $0.98 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
BASA vs HCMLY Comparison August 2025
BASA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASA stands at 7.8M. In comparison, HCMLY has a market cap of 44.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BASA is priced at $0.03, while HCMLY trades at $16.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas HCMLY's P/E ratio is 11.44. In terms of profitability, BASA's ROE is +0.22%, compared to HCMLY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BASA is more volatile compared to HCMLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASA.Check HCMLY's competition here
BASA vs HCMLF Comparison August 2025
BASA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASA stands at 7.8M. In comparison, HCMLF has a market cap of 42.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BASA is priced at $0.03, while HCMLF trades at $78.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas HCMLF's P/E ratio is 11.09. In terms of profitability, BASA's ROE is +0.22%, compared to HCMLF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BASA is more volatile compared to HCMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASA.Check HCMLF's competition here
BASA vs HLBZF Comparison August 2025
BASA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASA stands at 7.8M. In comparison, HLBZF has a market cap of 40.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BASA is priced at $0.03, while HLBZF trades at $226.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas HLBZF's P/E ratio is 18.91. In terms of profitability, BASA's ROE is +0.22%, compared to HLBZF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BASA is more volatile compared to HLBZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASA.Check HLBZF's competition here
BASA vs CRHCF Comparison August 2025
BASA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASA stands at 7.8M. In comparison, CRHCF has a market cap of 38.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BASA is priced at $0.03, while CRHCF trades at $53.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas CRHCF's P/E ratio is 13.91. In terms of profitability, BASA's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CRHCF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BASA is more volatile compared to CRHCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASA.Check CRHCF's competition here
BASA vs UCLQF Comparison August 2025
BASA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASA stands at 7.8M. In comparison, UCLQF has a market cap of 30.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BASA is priced at $0.03, while UCLQF trades at $103.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas UCLQF's P/E ratio is 35.15. In terms of profitability, BASA's ROE is +0.22%, compared to UCLQF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BASA is more volatile compared to UCLQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASA.Check UCLQF's competition here
BASA vs GRSXY Comparison August 2025
BASA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASA stands at 7.8M. In comparison, GRSXY has a market cap of 21.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BASA is priced at $0.03, while GRSXY trades at $19.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas GRSXY's P/E ratio is 15.20. In terms of profitability, BASA's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GRSXY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BASA is more volatile compared to GRSXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASA.Check GRSXY's competition here
BASA vs AHCHF Comparison August 2025
BASA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASA stands at 7.8M. In comparison, AHCHF has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BASA is priced at $0.03, while AHCHF trades at $2.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas AHCHF's P/E ratio is 13.76. In terms of profitability, BASA's ROE is +0.22%, compared to AHCHF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BASA is less volatile compared to AHCHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASA.Check AHCHF's competition here
BASA vs AHCHY Comparison August 2025
BASA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASA stands at 7.8M. In comparison, AHCHY has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BASA is priced at $0.03, while AHCHY trades at $14.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas AHCHY's P/E ratio is 13.55. In terms of profitability, BASA's ROE is +0.22%, compared to AHCHY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BASA is more volatile compared to AHCHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASA.Check AHCHY's competition here
BASA vs JHIUF Comparison August 2025
BASA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASA stands at 7.8M. In comparison, JHIUF has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BASA is priced at $0.03, while JHIUF trades at $27.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas JHIUF's P/E ratio is 27.92. In terms of profitability, BASA's ROE is +0.22%, compared to JHIUF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BASA is more volatile compared to JHIUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASA.Check JHIUF's competition here
BASA vs IMYSY Comparison August 2025
BASA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASA stands at 7.8M. In comparison, IMYSY has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BASA is priced at $0.03, while IMYSY trades at $5.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas IMYSY's P/E ratio is -22.96. In terms of profitability, BASA's ROE is +0.22%, compared to IMYSY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BASA is more volatile compared to IMYSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASA.Check IMYSY's competition here
BASA vs CXMSF Comparison August 2025
BASA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASA stands at 7.8M. In comparison, CXMSF has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BASA is priced at $0.03, while CXMSF trades at $0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas CXMSF's P/E ratio is 14.50. In terms of profitability, BASA's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CXMSF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BASA is more volatile compared to CXMSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASA.Check CXMSF's competition here
BASA vs BZZUF Comparison August 2025
BASA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASA stands at 7.8M. In comparison, BZZUF has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BASA is priced at $0.03, while BZZUF trades at $53.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas BZZUF's P/E ratio is 8.89. In terms of profitability, BASA's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BZZUF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BASA is more volatile compared to BZZUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASA.Check BZZUF's competition here
BASA vs BZZUY Comparison August 2025
BASA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASA stands at 7.8M. In comparison, BZZUY has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BASA is priced at $0.03, while BZZUY trades at $23.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas BZZUY's P/E ratio is 7.96. In terms of profitability, BASA's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BZZUY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BASA is more volatile compared to BZZUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASA.Check BZZUY's competition here
BASA vs TGBMF Comparison August 2025
BASA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASA stands at 7.8M. In comparison, TGBMF has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BASA is priced at $0.03, while TGBMF trades at $0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas TGBMF's P/E ratio is 24.73. In terms of profitability, BASA's ROE is +0.22%, compared to TGBMF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BASA is more volatile compared to TGBMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASA.Check TGBMF's competition here
BASA vs ADLDY Comparison August 2025
BASA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASA stands at 7.8M. In comparison, ADLDY has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BASA is priced at $0.03, while ADLDY trades at $8.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas ADLDY's P/E ratio is 21.95. In terms of profitability, BASA's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ADLDY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BASA is less volatile compared to ADLDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASA.Check ADLDY's competition here
BASA vs HDELY Comparison August 2025
BASA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASA stands at 7.8M. In comparison, HDELY has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BASA is priced at $0.03, while HDELY trades at $25.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas HDELY's P/E ratio is 12.21. In terms of profitability, BASA's ROE is +0.22%, compared to HDELY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BASA is more volatile compared to HDELY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASA.Check HDELY's competition here
BASA vs XYIGY Comparison August 2025
BASA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASA stands at 7.8M. In comparison, XYIGY has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BASA is priced at $0.03, while XYIGY trades at $19.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas XYIGY's P/E ratio is 9.27. In terms of profitability, BASA's ROE is +0.22%, compared to XYIGY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BASA is more volatile compared to XYIGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASA.Check XYIGY's competition here
BASA vs CBUMF Comparison August 2025
BASA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASA stands at 7.8M. In comparison, CBUMF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BASA is priced at $0.03, while CBUMF trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas CBUMF's P/E ratio is 13.78. In terms of profitability, BASA's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CBUMF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BASA is less volatile compared to CBUMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASA.Check CBUMF's competition here
BASA vs FCREY Comparison August 2025
BASA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASA stands at 7.8M. In comparison, FCREY has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BASA is priced at $0.03, while FCREY trades at $3.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas FCREY's P/E ratio is -9.64. In terms of profitability, BASA's ROE is +0.22%, compared to FCREY's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BASA is more volatile compared to FCREY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASA.Check FCREY's competition here
BASA vs BOALF Comparison August 2025
BASA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASA stands at 7.8M. In comparison, BOALF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BASA is priced at $0.03, while BOALF trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas BOALF's P/E ratio is 27.69. In terms of profitability, BASA's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BOALF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BASA is more volatile compared to BOALF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASA.Check BOALF's competition here
BASA vs XYIGF Comparison August 2025
BASA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASA stands at 7.8M. In comparison, XYIGF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BASA is priced at $0.03, while XYIGF trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas XYIGF's P/E ratio is 8.02. In terms of profitability, BASA's ROE is +0.22%, compared to XYIGF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BASA is more volatile compared to XYIGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASA.Check XYIGF's competition here
BASA vs BOALY Comparison August 2025
BASA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASA stands at 7.8M. In comparison, BOALY has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BASA is priced at $0.03, while BOALY trades at $14.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas BOALY's P/E ratio is 36.87. In terms of profitability, BASA's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BOALY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BASA is more volatile compared to BOALY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASA.Check BOALY's competition here
BASA vs WBRBY Comparison August 2025
BASA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASA stands at 7.8M. In comparison, WBRBY has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BASA is priced at $0.03, while WBRBY trades at $6.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas WBRBY's P/E ratio is 25.52. In terms of profitability, BASA's ROE is +0.22%, compared to WBRBY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BASA is more volatile compared to WBRBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASA.Check WBRBY's competition here
BASA vs WBRBF Comparison August 2025
BASA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASA stands at 7.8M. In comparison, WBRBF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BASA is priced at $0.03, while WBRBF trades at $31.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas WBRBF's P/E ratio is 24.44. In terms of profitability, BASA's ROE is +0.22%, compared to WBRBF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BASA is more volatile compared to WBRBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASA.Check WBRBF's competition here
BASA vs GCWOF Comparison August 2025
BASA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASA stands at 7.8M. In comparison, GCWOF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, BASA is priced at $0.03, while GCWOF trades at $8.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas GCWOF's P/E ratio is 9.70. In terms of profitability, BASA's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GCWOF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BASA is more volatile compared to GCWOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASA.Check GCWOF's competition here
BASA vs THYCY Comparison August 2025
BASA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASA stands at 7.8M. In comparison, THYCY has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BASA is priced at $0.03, while THYCY trades at $6.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas THYCY's P/E ratio is 7.60. In terms of profitability, BASA's ROE is +0.22%, compared to THYCY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BASA is more volatile compared to THYCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASA.Check THYCY's competition here
BASA vs IMYSF Comparison August 2025
BASA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASA stands at 7.8M. In comparison, IMYSF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BASA is priced at $0.03, while IMYSF trades at $34.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas IMYSF's P/E ratio is -26.57. In terms of profitability, BASA's ROE is +0.22%, compared to IMYSF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BASA is more volatile compared to IMYSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASA.Check IMYSF's competition here
BASA vs SDCVF Comparison August 2025
BASA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASA stands at 7.8M. In comparison, SDCVF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BASA is priced at $0.03, while SDCVF trades at $63.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas SDCVF's P/E ratio is 9.12. In terms of profitability, BASA's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SDCVF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BASA is less volatile compared to SDCVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASA.Check SDCVF's competition here
BASA vs THYCF Comparison August 2025
BASA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASA stands at 7.8M. In comparison, THYCF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BASA is priced at $0.03, while THYCF trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas THYCF's P/E ratio is 7.33. In terms of profitability, BASA's ROE is +0.22%, compared to THYCF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BASA is more volatile compared to THYCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASA.Check THYCF's competition here
BASA vs CMZOF Comparison August 2025
BASA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASA stands at 7.8M. In comparison, CMZOF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BASA is priced at $0.03, while CMZOF trades at $3.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas CMZOF's P/E ratio is 11.67. In terms of profitability, BASA's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CMZOF's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, BASA is more volatile compared to CMZOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASA.Check CMZOF's competition here
BASA vs BRKWF Comparison August 2025
BASA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASA stands at 7.8M. In comparison, BRKWF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BASA is priced at $0.03, while BRKWF trades at $17.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas BRKWF's P/E ratio is -83.86. In terms of profitability, BASA's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BRKWF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BASA is more volatile compared to BRKWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASA.Check BRKWF's competition here
BASA vs FRCEF Comparison August 2025
BASA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASA stands at 7.8M. In comparison, FRCEF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, BASA is priced at $0.03, while FRCEF trades at $1.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas FRCEF's P/E ratio is -14.35. In terms of profitability, BASA's ROE is +0.22%, compared to FRCEF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BASA is more volatile compared to FRCEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASA.Check FRCEF's competition here
BASA vs HCPHY Comparison August 2025
BASA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASA stands at 7.8M. In comparison, HCPHY has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BASA is priced at $0.03, while HCPHY trades at $14.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas HCPHY's P/E ratio is 34.39. In terms of profitability, BASA's ROE is +0.22%, compared to HCPHY's ROE of +1.66%. Regarding short-term risk, BASA is more volatile compared to HCPHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASA.Check HCPHY's competition here
BASA vs CARCY Comparison August 2025
BASA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASA stands at 7.8M. In comparison, CARCY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BASA is priced at $0.03, while CARCY trades at $7.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas CARCY's P/E ratio is 56.92. In terms of profitability, BASA's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CARCY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BASA is more volatile compared to CARCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASA.Check CARCY's competition here
BASA vs CJRCF Comparison August 2025
BASA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASA stands at 7.8M. In comparison, CJRCF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BASA is priced at $0.03, while CJRCF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas CJRCF's P/E ratio is 22.90. In terms of profitability, BASA's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CJRCF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BASA is more volatile compared to CJRCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASA.Check CJRCF's competition here
BASA vs PITPF Comparison August 2025
BASA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASA stands at 7.8M. In comparison, PITPF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BASA is priced at $0.03, while PITPF trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas PITPF's P/E ratio is 14.10. In terms of profitability, BASA's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PITPF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BASA is less volatile compared to PITPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASA.Check PITPF's competition here
BASA vs ADBCF Comparison August 2025
BASA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASA stands at 7.8M. In comparison, ADBCF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BASA is priced at $0.03, while ADBCF trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas ADBCF's P/E ratio is 22.78. In terms of profitability, BASA's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ADBCF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BASA is more volatile compared to ADBCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASA.Check ADBCF's competition here
BASA vs CCGLF Comparison August 2025
BASA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASA stands at 7.8M. In comparison, CCGLF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BASA is priced at $0.03, while CCGLF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas CCGLF's P/E ratio is 2.27. In terms of profitability, BASA's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CCGLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BASA is more volatile compared to CCGLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASA.Check CCGLF's competition here
BASA vs WCHNF Comparison August 2025
BASA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASA stands at 7.8M. In comparison, WCHNF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BASA is priced at $0.03, while WCHNF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas WCHNF's P/E ratio is 23.04. In terms of profitability, BASA's ROE is +0.22%, compared to WCHNF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BASA is more volatile compared to WCHNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASA.Check WCHNF's competition here
BASA vs PITPY Comparison August 2025
BASA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASA stands at 7.8M. In comparison, PITPY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BASA is priced at $0.03, while PITPY trades at $3.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas PITPY's P/E ratio is 8.49. In terms of profitability, BASA's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PITPY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BASA is more volatile compared to PITPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASA.Check PITPY's competition here
BASA vs PSGTF Comparison August 2025
BASA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASA stands at 7.8M. In comparison, PSGTF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, BASA is priced at $0.03, while PSGTF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas PSGTF's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, BASA's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PSGTF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BASA is less volatile compared to PSGTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASA.Check PSGTF's competition here
BASA vs PSGTY Comparison August 2025
BASA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASA stands at 7.8M. In comparison, PSGTY has a market cap of 979M. Regarding current trading prices, BASA is priced at $0.03, while PSGTY trades at $2.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas PSGTY's P/E ratio is 58.00. In terms of profitability, BASA's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PSGTY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BASA is more volatile compared to PSGTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASA.Check PSGTY's competition here
BASA vs PTHIF Comparison August 2025
BASA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASA stands at 7.8M. In comparison, PTHIF has a market cap of 894.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BASA is priced at $0.03, while PTHIF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas PTHIF's P/E ratio is 9.92. In terms of profitability, BASA's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PTHIF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BASA is more volatile compared to PTHIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASA.Check PTHIF's competition here
BASA vs SUCEF Comparison August 2025
BASA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASA stands at 7.8M. In comparison, SUCEF has a market cap of 859.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BASA is priced at $0.03, while SUCEF trades at $26.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas SUCEF's P/E ratio is 9.08. In terms of profitability, BASA's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SUCEF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BASA is more volatile compared to SUCEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASA.Check SUCEF's competition here
BASA vs IBJHF Comparison August 2025
BASA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASA stands at 7.8M. In comparison, IBJHF has a market cap of 813M. Regarding current trading prices, BASA is priced at $0.03, while IBJHF trades at $2.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas IBJHF's P/E ratio is 41.20. In terms of profitability, BASA's ROE is +0.22%, compared to IBJHF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BASA is less volatile compared to IBJHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASA.Check IBJHF's competition here
BASA vs BBMPY Comparison August 2025
BASA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASA stands at 7.8M. In comparison, BBMPY has a market cap of 811.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BASA is priced at $0.03, while BBMPY trades at $1.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas BBMPY's P/E ratio is -13.82. In terms of profitability, BASA's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BBMPY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BASA is less volatile compared to BBMPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASA.Check BBMPY's competition here
BASA vs FTTRF Comparison August 2025
BASA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASA stands at 7.8M. In comparison, FTTRF has a market cap of 661.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BASA is priced at $0.03, while FTTRF trades at $3.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas FTTRF's P/E ratio is 31.40. In terms of profitability, BASA's ROE is +0.22%, compared to FTTRF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BASA is more volatile compared to FTTRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASA.Check FTTRF's competition here
BASA vs MCEM Comparison August 2025
BASA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASA stands at 7.8M. In comparison, MCEM has a market cap of 586.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BASA is priced at $0.03, while MCEM trades at $230.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas MCEM's P/E ratio is 10.87. In terms of profitability, BASA's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MCEM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BASA is more volatile compared to MCEM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASA.Check MCEM's competition here
BASA vs CMTOY Comparison August 2025
BASA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASA stands at 7.8M. In comparison, CMTOY has a market cap of 578M. Regarding current trading prices, BASA is priced at $0.03, while CMTOY trades at $11.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas CMTOY's P/E ratio is 370.00. In terms of profitability, BASA's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CMTOY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BASA is more volatile compared to CMTOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASA.Check CMTOY's competition here
BASA vs CWXZF Comparison August 2025
BASA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASA stands at 7.8M. In comparison, CWXZF has a market cap of 547.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BASA is priced at $0.03, while CWXZF trades at $6.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas CWXZF's P/E ratio is 11.81. In terms of profitability, BASA's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CWXZF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BASA is more volatile compared to CWXZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASA.Check CWXZF's competition here
BASA vs CGCLF Comparison August 2025
BASA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASA stands at 7.8M. In comparison, CGCLF has a market cap of 518M. Regarding current trading prices, BASA is priced at $0.03, while CGCLF trades at $20.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas CGCLF's P/E ratio is 7.39. In terms of profitability, BASA's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CGCLF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BASA is more volatile compared to CGCLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASA.Check CGCLF's competition here
BASA vs PPCLY Comparison August 2025
BASA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASA stands at 7.8M. In comparison, PPCLY has a market cap of 425.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BASA is priced at $0.03, while PPCLY trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas PPCLY's P/E ratio is 14.50. In terms of profitability, BASA's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PPCLY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BASA is more volatile compared to PPCLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASA.Check PPCLY's competition here
BASA vs BHBSY Comparison August 2025
BASA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASA stands at 7.8M. In comparison, BHBSY has a market cap of 360M. Regarding current trading prices, BASA is priced at $0.03, while BHBSY trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas BHBSY's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, BASA's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BHBSY's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BASA is more volatile compared to BHBSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASA.Check BHBSY's competition here
BASA vs CHYMF Comparison August 2025
BASA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASA stands at 7.8M. In comparison, CHYMF has a market cap of 318M. Regarding current trading prices, BASA is priced at $0.03, while CHYMF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas CHYMF's P/E ratio is 9.86. In terms of profitability, BASA's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CHYMF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BASA is less volatile compared to CHYMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASA.Check CHYMF's competition here
BASA vs BSND Comparison August 2025
BASA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASA stands at 7.8M. In comparison, BSND has a market cap of 115.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BASA is priced at $0.03, while BSND trades at $855.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas BSND's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BASA's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BSND's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BASA is more volatile compared to BSND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASA.Check BSND's competition here
BASA vs TGAFF Comparison August 2025
BASA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASA stands at 7.8M. In comparison, TGAFF has a market cap of 107.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BASA is priced at $0.03, while TGAFF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas TGAFF's P/E ratio is 3.33. In terms of profitability, BASA's ROE is +0.22%, compared to TGAFF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BASA is more volatile compared to TGAFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASA.Check TGAFF's competition here
BASA vs BURCP Comparison August 2025
BASA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASA stands at 7.8M. In comparison, BURCP has a market cap of 88.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BASA is priced at $0.03, while BURCP trades at $53.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas BURCP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BASA's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BURCP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BASA is more volatile compared to BURCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASA.Check BURCP's competition here
BASA vs CBUMY Comparison August 2025
BASA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASA stands at 7.8M. In comparison, CBUMY has a market cap of 79.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BASA is priced at $0.03, while CBUMY trades at $28.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas CBUMY's P/E ratio is 14.21. In terms of profitability, BASA's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CBUMY's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BASA is less volatile compared to CBUMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASA.Check CBUMY's competition here
BASA vs SPPCF Comparison August 2025
BASA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASA stands at 7.8M. In comparison, SPPCF has a market cap of 67.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BASA is priced at $0.03, while SPPCF trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas SPPCF's P/E ratio is 7.75. In terms of profitability, BASA's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SPPCF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BASA is more volatile compared to SPPCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASA.Check SPPCF's competition here
BASA vs ZHIXF Comparison August 2025
BASA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASA stands at 7.8M. In comparison, ZHIXF has a market cap of 57.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BASA is priced at $0.03, while ZHIXF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas ZHIXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BASA's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ZHIXF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BASA is more volatile compared to ZHIXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASA.Check ZHIXF's competition here
BASA vs RTGOF Comparison August 2025
BASA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASA stands at 7.8M. In comparison, RTGOF has a market cap of 38.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BASA is priced at $0.03, while RTGOF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas RTGOF's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, BASA's ROE is +0.22%, compared to RTGOF's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, BASA is more volatile compared to RTGOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASA.Check RTGOF's competition here
BASA vs CTXXF Comparison August 2025
BASA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASA stands at 7.8M. In comparison, CTXXF has a market cap of 32.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BASA is priced at $0.03, while CTXXF trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas CTXXF's P/E ratio is -21.91. In terms of profitability, BASA's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CTXXF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BASA is more volatile compared to CTXXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASA.Check CTXXF's competition here
BASA vs ACPS Comparison August 2025
BASA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASA stands at 7.8M. In comparison, ACPS has a market cap of 21.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BASA is priced at $0.03, while ACPS trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas ACPS's P/E ratio is 13.20. In terms of profitability, BASA's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ACPS's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BASA is more volatile compared to ACPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASA.Check ACPS's competition here
BASA vs PTHIY Comparison August 2025
BASA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASA stands at 7.8M. In comparison, PTHIY has a market cap of 21.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BASA is priced at $0.03, while PTHIY trades at $5.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas PTHIY's P/E ratio is 19.77. In terms of profitability, BASA's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PTHIY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BASA is more volatile compared to PTHIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASA.Check PTHIY's competition here
BASA vs LKSGF Comparison August 2025
BASA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASA stands at 7.8M. In comparison, LKSGF has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, BASA is priced at $0.03, while LKSGF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas LKSGF's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, BASA's ROE is +0.22%, compared to LKSGF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BASA is less volatile compared to LKSGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASA.Check LKSGF's competition here
BASA vs PNLT Comparison August 2025
BASA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASA stands at 7.8M. In comparison, PNLT has a market cap of 8.7K. Regarding current trading prices, BASA is priced at $0.03, while PNLT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas PNLT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, BASA's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PNLT's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, BASA is more volatile compared to PNLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASA.Check PNLT's competition here
BASA vs SNLP Comparison August 2025
BASA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASA stands at 7.8M. In comparison, SNLP has a market cap of 3.5K. Regarding current trading prices, BASA is priced at $0.03, while SNLP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas SNLP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BASA's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SNLP's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, BASA is more volatile compared to SNLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASA.Check SNLP's competition here
BASA vs CHGS Comparison August 2025
BASA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASA stands at 7.8M. In comparison, CHGS has a market cap of 2.7K. Regarding current trading prices, BASA is priced at $0.03, while CHGS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas CHGS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BASA's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CHGS's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, BASA is more volatile compared to CHGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASA.Check CHGS's competition here
BASA vs WWST Comparison August 2025
BASA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASA stands at 7.8M. In comparison, WWST has a market cap of 33. Regarding current trading prices, BASA is priced at $0.03, while WWST trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas WWST's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, BASA's ROE is +0.22%, compared to WWST's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BASA is more volatile compared to WWST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASA.Check WWST's competition here
BASA vs AQCP Comparison August 2025
BASA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASA stands at 7.8M. In comparison, AQCP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BASA is priced at $0.03, while AQCP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas AQCP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BASA's ROE is +0.22%, compared to AQCP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BASA is more volatile compared to AQCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASA.Check AQCP's competition here
BASA vs TJSS Comparison August 2025
BASA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASA stands at 7.8M. In comparison, TJSS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BASA is priced at $0.03, while TJSS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas TJSS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BASA's ROE is +0.22%, compared to TJSS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BASA is less volatile compared to TJSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASA.Check TJSS's competition here
BASA vs LXRRF Comparison August 2025
BASA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BASA stands at 7.8M. In comparison, LXRRF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BASA is priced at $0.03, while LXRRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BASA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas LXRRF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, BASA's ROE is +0.22%, compared to LXRRF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BASA is more volatile compared to LXRRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BASA.Check LXRRF's competition here