Banneker, Inc.
Banneker, Inc. BANI Peers
See (BANI) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Luxury Goods Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BANI | $0.00 | N/A | 4.1M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| HESAY | $270.35 | +0.78% | 283.4B | 53.75 | $5.03 | +1.14% |
| HESAF | $2,693.50 | +0.89% | 282.4B | 53.23 | $50.60 | +1.08% |
| LVMHF | $538.41 | -0.66% | 268.8B | 18.80 | $28.64 | +3.06% |
| LVMUY | $107.45 | -0.74% | 268.2B | 18.75 | $5.73 | +2.16% |
| CFRUY | $18.60 | -0.01% | 109.6B | 25.48 | $0.73 | +2.19% |
| CFRHF | $185.00 | N/A | 108.3B | 25.34 | $7.30 | +1.97% |
| CHDRF | $515.15 | +2.15% | 92.9B | 15.64 | $32.94 | +2.82% |
| CHDRY | $126.00 | -0.12% | 90.9B | 15.29 | $8.24 | +2.34% |
| PPRUY | $20.65 | -0.63% | 25.3B | 19.48 | $1.06 | +2.19% |
Stock Comparison
BANI vs HESAY Comparison
BANI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANI stands at 4.1M. In comparison, HESAY has a market cap of 283.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BANI is priced at $0.00, while HESAY trades at $270.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HESAY's P/E ratio is 53.75. In terms of profitability, BANI's ROE is -1.02%, compared to HESAY's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, BANI is less volatile compared to HESAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANI.
BANI vs HESAF Comparison
BANI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANI stands at 4.1M. In comparison, HESAF has a market cap of 282.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BANI is priced at $0.00, while HESAF trades at $2,693.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HESAF's P/E ratio is 53.23. In terms of profitability, BANI's ROE is -1.02%, compared to HESAF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, BANI is less volatile compared to HESAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANI.
BANI vs LVMHF Comparison
BANI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANI stands at 4.1M. In comparison, LVMHF has a market cap of 268.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BANI is priced at $0.00, while LVMHF trades at $538.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LVMHF's P/E ratio is 18.80. In terms of profitability, BANI's ROE is -1.02%, compared to LVMHF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BANI is less volatile compared to LVMHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANI.
BANI vs LVMUY Comparison
BANI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANI stands at 4.1M. In comparison, LVMUY has a market cap of 268.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BANI is priced at $0.00, while LVMUY trades at $107.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LVMUY's P/E ratio is 18.75. In terms of profitability, BANI's ROE is -1.02%, compared to LVMUY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BANI is less volatile compared to LVMUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANI.
BANI vs CFRUY Comparison
BANI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANI stands at 4.1M. In comparison, CFRUY has a market cap of 109.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BANI is priced at $0.00, while CFRUY trades at $18.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CFRUY's P/E ratio is 25.48. In terms of profitability, BANI's ROE is -1.02%, compared to CFRUY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BANI is less volatile compared to CFRUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANI.
BANI vs CFRHF Comparison
BANI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANI stands at 4.1M. In comparison, CFRHF has a market cap of 108.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BANI is priced at $0.00, while CFRHF trades at $185.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CFRHF's P/E ratio is 25.34. In terms of profitability, BANI's ROE is -1.02%, compared to CFRHF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BANI is less volatile compared to CFRHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANI.
BANI vs CHDRF Comparison
BANI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANI stands at 4.1M. In comparison, CHDRF has a market cap of 92.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BANI is priced at $0.00, while CHDRF trades at $515.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHDRF's P/E ratio is 15.64. In terms of profitability, BANI's ROE is -1.02%, compared to CHDRF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, BANI and CHDRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BANI vs CHDRY Comparison
BANI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANI stands at 4.1M. In comparison, CHDRY has a market cap of 90.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BANI is priced at $0.00, while CHDRY trades at $126.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHDRY's P/E ratio is 15.29. In terms of profitability, BANI's ROE is -1.02%, compared to CHDRY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BANI is less volatile compared to CHDRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANI.
BANI vs PPRUY Comparison
BANI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANI stands at 4.1M. In comparison, PPRUY has a market cap of 25.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BANI is priced at $0.00, while PPRUY trades at $20.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PPRUY's P/E ratio is 19.48. In terms of profitability, BANI's ROE is -1.02%, compared to PPRUY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BANI is less volatile compared to PPRUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANI.
BANI vs PPRUF Comparison
BANI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANI stands at 4.1M. In comparison, PPRUF has a market cap of 25.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BANI is priced at $0.00, while PPRUF trades at $204.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PPRUF's P/E ratio is 19.78. In terms of profitability, BANI's ROE is -1.02%, compared to PPRUF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BANI is less volatile compared to PPRUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANI.
BANI vs PRDSY Comparison
BANI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANI stands at 4.1M. In comparison, PRDSY has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BANI is priced at $0.00, while PRDSY trades at $12.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRDSY's P/E ratio is 17.25. In terms of profitability, BANI's ROE is -1.02%, compared to PRDSY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BANI is less volatile compared to PRDSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANI.
BANI vs CJEWY Comparison
BANI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANI stands at 4.1M. In comparison, CJEWY has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BANI is priced at $0.00, while CJEWY trades at $16.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CJEWY's P/E ratio is 28.05. In terms of profitability, BANI's ROE is -1.02%, compared to CJEWY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BANI and CJEWY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BANI vs PRDSF Comparison
BANI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANI stands at 4.1M. In comparison, PRDSF has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BANI is priced at $0.00, while PRDSF trades at $6.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRDSF's P/E ratio is 17.39. In terms of profitability, BANI's ROE is -1.02%, compared to PRDSF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BANI and PRDSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BANI vs CJEWF Comparison
BANI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANI stands at 4.1M. In comparison, CJEWF has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, BANI is priced at $0.00, while CJEWF trades at $1.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CJEWF's P/E ratio is 25.08. In terms of profitability, BANI's ROE is -1.02%, compared to CJEWF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BANI is less volatile compared to CJEWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANI.
BANI vs PNDZF Comparison
BANI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANI stands at 4.1M. In comparison, PNDZF has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BANI is priced at $0.00, while PNDZF trades at $151.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PNDZF's P/E ratio is 14.84. In terms of profitability, BANI's ROE is -1.02%, compared to PNDZF's ROE of +1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, BANI and PNDZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BANI vs SWGNF Comparison
BANI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANI stands at 4.1M. In comparison, SWGNF has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BANI is priced at $0.00, while SWGNF trades at $37.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SWGNF's P/E ratio is 41.19. In terms of profitability, BANI's ROE is -1.02%, compared to SWGNF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BANI and SWGNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BANI vs SWGAY Comparison
BANI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANI stands at 4.1M. In comparison, SWGAY has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BANI is priced at $0.00, while SWGAY trades at $8.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SWGAY's P/E ratio is 36.57. In terms of profitability, BANI's ROE is -1.02%, compared to SWGAY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BANI is less volatile compared to SWGAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANI.
BANI vs SWGAF Comparison
BANI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANI stands at 4.1M. In comparison, SWGAF has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BANI is priced at $0.00, while SWGAF trades at $161.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SWGAF's P/E ratio is 35.31. In terms of profitability, BANI's ROE is -1.02%, compared to SWGAF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BANI is less volatile compared to SWGAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANI.
BANI vs BURBY Comparison
BANI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANI stands at 4.1M. In comparison, BURBY has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BANI is priced at $0.00, while BURBY trades at $14.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BURBY's P/E ratio is -52.93. In terms of profitability, BANI's ROE is -1.02%, compared to BURBY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BANI is less volatile compared to BURBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANI.
BANI vs BBRYF Comparison
BANI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANI stands at 4.1M. In comparison, BBRYF has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BANI is priced at $0.00, while BBRYF trades at $14.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BBRYF's P/E ratio is -51.93. In terms of profitability, BANI's ROE is -1.02%, compared to BBRYF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BANI is less volatile compared to BBRYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANI.
BANI vs PANDY Comparison
BANI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANI stands at 4.1M. In comparison, PANDY has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BANI is priced at $0.00, while PANDY trades at $21.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PANDY's P/E ratio is 10.75. In terms of profitability, BANI's ROE is -1.02%, compared to PANDY's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BANI is less volatile compared to PANDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANI.
BANI vs BCUCY Comparison
BANI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANI stands at 4.1M. In comparison, BCUCY has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BANI is priced at $0.00, while BCUCY trades at $11.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BCUCY's P/E ratio is 58.90. In terms of profitability, BANI's ROE is -1.02%, compared to BCUCY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, BANI is less volatile compared to BCUCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANI.
BANI vs LKFLF Comparison
BANI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANI stands at 4.1M. In comparison, LKFLF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BANI is priced at $0.00, while LKFLF trades at $2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LKFLF's P/E ratio is 9.07. In terms of profitability, BANI's ROE is -1.02%, compared to LKFLF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BANI is less volatile compared to LKFLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANI.
BANI vs WOSGF Comparison
BANI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANI stands at 4.1M. In comparison, WOSGF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BANI is priced at $0.00, while WOSGF trades at $6.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WOSGF's P/E ratio is 26.65. In terms of profitability, BANI's ROE is -1.02%, compared to WOSGF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BANI is less volatile compared to WOSGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANI.
BANI vs SFRGY Comparison
BANI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANI stands at 4.1M. In comparison, SFRGY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BANI is priced at $0.00, while SFRGY trades at $3.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SFRGY's P/E ratio is -13.58. In terms of profitability, BANI's ROE is -1.02%, compared to SFRGY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BANI is less volatile compared to SFRGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANI.
BANI vs SFRGF Comparison
BANI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANI stands at 4.1M. In comparison, SFRGF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BANI is priced at $0.00, while SFRGF trades at $6.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SFRGF's P/E ratio is -13.62. In terms of profitability, BANI's ROE is -1.02%, compared to SFRGF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BANI is less volatile compared to SFRGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANI.
BANI vs CHOWF Comparison
BANI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANI stands at 4.1M. In comparison, CHOWF has a market cap of 591.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BANI is priced at $0.00, while CHOWF trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHOWF's P/E ratio is 5.87. In terms of profitability, BANI's ROE is -1.02%, compared to CHOWF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BANI is less volatile compared to CHOWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANI.
BANI vs ZAPNF Comparison
BANI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANI stands at 4.1M. In comparison, ZAPNF has a market cap of 254.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BANI is priced at $0.00, while ZAPNF trades at $39.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZAPNF's P/E ratio is 25.27. In terms of profitability, BANI's ROE is -1.02%, compared to ZAPNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BANI and ZAPNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BANI vs ORWHF Comparison
BANI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANI stands at 4.1M. In comparison, ORWHF has a market cap of 248.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BANI is priced at $0.00, while ORWHF trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ORWHF's P/E ratio is 8.50. In terms of profitability, BANI's ROE is -1.02%, compared to ORWHF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BANI and ORWHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BANI vs DCOHF Comparison
BANI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANI stands at 4.1M. In comparison, DCOHF has a market cap of 216.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BANI is priced at $0.00, while DCOHF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DCOHF's P/E ratio is 9.33. In terms of profitability, BANI's ROE is -1.02%, compared to DCOHF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BANI is less volatile compared to DCOHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANI.
BANI vs EPRJF Comparison
BANI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANI stands at 4.1M. In comparison, EPRJF has a market cap of 212.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BANI is priced at $0.00, while EPRJF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EPRJF's P/E ratio is 1.50. In terms of profitability, BANI's ROE is -1.02%, compared to EPRJF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BANI is less volatile compared to EPRJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANI.
BANI vs TSSJF Comparison
BANI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANI stands at 4.1M. In comparison, TSSJF has a market cap of 195.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BANI is priced at $0.00, while TSSJF trades at $12.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TSSJF's P/E ratio is 26.60. In terms of profitability, BANI's ROE is -1.02%, compared to TSSJF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BANI and TSSJF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BANI vs FLLIY Comparison
BANI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANI stands at 4.1M. In comparison, FLLIY has a market cap of 139.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BANI is priced at $0.00, while FLLIY trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLLIY's P/E ratio is -0.54. In terms of profitability, BANI's ROE is -1.02%, compared to FLLIY's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, BANI is less volatile compared to FLLIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANI.
BANI vs CTTLF Comparison
BANI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANI stands at 4.1M. In comparison, CTTLF has a market cap of 102.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BANI is priced at $0.00, while CTTLF trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTTLF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BANI's ROE is -1.02%, compared to CTTLF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, BANI and CTTLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BANI vs HENGF Comparison
BANI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANI stands at 4.1M. In comparison, HENGF has a market cap of 100.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BANI is priced at $0.00, while HENGF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HENGF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BANI's ROE is -1.02%, compared to HENGF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BANI and HENGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BANI vs CEBTF Comparison
BANI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANI stands at 4.1M. In comparison, CEBTF has a market cap of 78.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BANI is priced at $0.00, while CEBTF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CEBTF's P/E ratio is -1.80. In terms of profitability, BANI's ROE is -1.02%, compared to CEBTF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BANI is less volatile compared to CEBTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANI.
BANI vs MNNGF Comparison
BANI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANI stands at 4.1M. In comparison, MNNGF has a market cap of 61.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BANI is priced at $0.00, while MNNGF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MNNGF's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, BANI's ROE is -1.02%, compared to MNNGF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BANI is less volatile compared to MNNGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANI.
BANI vs MENEF Comparison
BANI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANI stands at 4.1M. In comparison, MENEF has a market cap of 27.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BANI is priced at $0.00, while MENEF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MENEF's P/E ratio is -10.45. In terms of profitability, BANI's ROE is -1.02%, compared to MENEF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BANI and MENEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BANI vs MDNL Comparison
BANI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANI stands at 4.1M. In comparison, MDNL has a market cap of 10.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BANI is priced at $0.00, while MDNL trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MDNL's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, BANI's ROE is -1.02%, compared to MDNL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BANI and MDNL have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BANI vs MAJJ Comparison
BANI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANI stands at 4.1M. In comparison, MAJJ has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BANI is priced at $0.00, while MAJJ trades at $1,800.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MAJJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BANI's ROE is -1.02%, compared to MAJJ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BANI and MAJJ have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BANI vs HENGY Comparison
BANI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANI stands at 4.1M. In comparison, HENGY has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BANI is priced at $0.00, while HENGY trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HENGY's P/E ratio is -7.40. In terms of profitability, BANI's ROE is -1.02%, compared to HENGY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BANI is less volatile compared to HENGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANI.
BANI vs EATR Comparison
BANI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANI stands at 4.1M. In comparison, EATR has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BANI is priced at $0.00, while EATR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EATR's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, BANI's ROE is -1.02%, compared to EATR's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BANI and EATR have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BANI vs SSOK Comparison
BANI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANI stands at 4.1M. In comparison, SSOK has a market cap of 503.2K. Regarding current trading prices, BANI is priced at $0.00, while SSOK trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SSOK's P/E ratio is 0.59. In terms of profitability, BANI's ROE is -1.02%, compared to SSOK's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, BANI and SSOK have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BANI vs BRGO Comparison
BANI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANI stands at 4.1M. In comparison, BRGO has a market cap of 289.8K. Regarding current trading prices, BANI is priced at $0.00, while BRGO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BRGO's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, BANI's ROE is -1.02%, compared to BRGO's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, BANI and BRGO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BANI vs AVEW Comparison
BANI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANI stands at 4.1M. In comparison, AVEW has a market cap of 125K. Regarding current trading prices, BANI is priced at $0.00, while AVEW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AVEW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, BANI's ROE is -1.02%, compared to AVEW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BANI is less volatile compared to AVEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANI.
BANI vs MASN Comparison
BANI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANI stands at 4.1M. In comparison, MASN has a market cap of 109K. Regarding current trading prices, BANI is priced at $0.00, while MASN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MASN's P/E ratio is 0.04. In terms of profitability, BANI's ROE is -1.02%, compared to MASN's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BANI and MASN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BANI vs BRGOD Comparison
BANI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANI stands at 4.1M. In comparison, BRGOD has a market cap of 78.1K. Regarding current trading prices, BANI is priced at $0.00, while BRGOD trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BRGOD's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, BANI's ROE is -1.02%, compared to BRGOD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BANI is less volatile compared to BRGOD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANI.