Brookfield Asset Management Ltd.
Brookfield Asset Management Ltd. BAM.TO Peers
See (BAM.TO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BAM.TO | CA$86.18 | +1.56% | 139B | 46.33 | CA$1.86 | +2.65% |
| BLK.NE | CA$29.25 | -0.17% | 233.1B | 26.83 | CA$1.09 | N/A |
| BN.TO | CA$92.03 | -0.10% | 151.7B | 230.05 | CA$0.40 | +0.52% |
| VFV.TO | CA$154.02 | +0.42% | 23.5B | 26.98 | CA$5.71 | +0.99% |
| ZSP.TO | CA$94.98 | +0.44% | 18.9B | N/A | N/A | +0.88% |
| PHYS.TO | CA$35.27 | -0.23% | 16.4B | 3.74 | CA$9.44 | N/A |
| XIU.TO | CA$41.22 | -0.12% | 14.5B | 20.35 | CA$2.03 | +2.73% |
| XEF.TO | CA$43.24 | -0.35% | 12.9B | 17.13 | CA$2.52 | +2.58% |
| VUN.TO | CA$115.83 | +0.42% | 12.1B | 26.19 | CA$4.42 | +0.91% |
| IGM.TO | CA$46.40 | +1.98% | 11B | 11.69 | CA$3.97 | +4.84% |
Stock Comparison
BAM.TO vs BLK.NE Comparison
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, BLK.NE has a market cap of 233.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$86.18, while BLK.NE trades at CA$29.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.33, whereas BLK.NE's P/E ratio is 26.83. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BLK.NE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to BLK.NE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.
BAM.TO vs BN.TO Comparison
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, BN.TO has a market cap of 151.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$86.18, while BN.TO trades at CA$92.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.33, whereas BN.TO's P/E ratio is 230.05. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BN.TO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is less volatile compared to BN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.
BAM.TO vs VFV.TO Comparison
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, VFV.TO has a market cap of 23.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$86.18, while VFV.TO trades at CA$154.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.33, whereas VFV.TO's P/E ratio is 26.98. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to VFV.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to VFV.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.
BAM.TO vs ZSP.TO Comparison
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, ZSP.TO has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$86.18, while ZSP.TO trades at CA$94.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.33, whereas ZSP.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ZSP.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to ZSP.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.
BAM.TO vs PHYS.TO Comparison
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, PHYS.TO has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$86.18, while PHYS.TO trades at CA$35.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.33, whereas PHYS.TO's P/E ratio is 3.74. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PHYS.TO's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to PHYS.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.
BAM.TO vs XIU.TO Comparison
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, XIU.TO has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$86.18, while XIU.TO trades at CA$41.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.33, whereas XIU.TO's P/E ratio is 20.35. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to XIU.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to XIU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.
BAM.TO vs XEF.TO Comparison
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, XEF.TO has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$86.18, while XEF.TO trades at CA$43.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.33, whereas XEF.TO's P/E ratio is 17.13. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to XEF.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to XEF.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.
BAM.TO vs VUN.TO Comparison
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, VUN.TO has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$86.18, while VUN.TO trades at CA$115.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.33, whereas VUN.TO's P/E ratio is 26.19. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to VUN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to VUN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.
BAM.TO vs IGM.TO Comparison
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, IGM.TO has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$86.18, while IGM.TO trades at CA$46.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.33, whereas IGM.TO's P/E ratio is 11.69. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to IGM.TO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is less volatile compared to IGM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.
BAM.TO vs ZCN.TO Comparison
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, ZCN.TO has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$86.18, while ZCN.TO trades at CA$36.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.33, whereas ZCN.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ZCN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to ZCN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.
BAM.TO vs ZEA.TO Comparison
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, ZEA.TO has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$86.18, while ZEA.TO trades at CA$26.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.33, whereas ZEA.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ZEA.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to ZEA.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.
BAM.TO vs PSLV.TO Comparison
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, PSLV.TO has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$86.18, while PSLV.TO trades at CA$18.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.33, whereas PSLV.TO's P/E ratio is 4.34. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PSLV.TO's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to PSLV.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.
BAM.TO vs VCN.TO Comparison
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, VCN.TO has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$86.18, while VCN.TO trades at CA$55.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.33, whereas VCN.TO's P/E ratio is 21.85. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to VCN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to VCN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.
BAM.TO vs XUS.TO Comparison
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, XUS.TO has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$86.18, while XUS.TO trades at CA$53.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.33, whereas XUS.TO's P/E ratio is 27.45. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to XUS.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to XUS.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.
BAM.TO vs XIC.TO Comparison
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, XIC.TO has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$86.18, while XIC.TO trades at CA$43.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.33, whereas XIC.TO's P/E ratio is 19.87. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to XIC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to XIC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.
BAM.TO vs XSP.TO Comparison
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, XSP.TO has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$86.18, while XSP.TO trades at CA$65.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.33, whereas XSP.TO's P/E ratio is 27.45. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to XSP.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to XSP.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.
BAM.TO vs CEF.TO Comparison
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, CEF.TO has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$86.18, while CEF.TO trades at CA$42.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.33, whereas CEF.TO's P/E ratio is 22.51. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CEF.TO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to CEF.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.
BAM.TO vs XEQT.TO Comparison
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, XEQT.TO has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$86.18, while XEQT.TO trades at CA$36.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.33, whereas XEQT.TO's P/E ratio is 21.07. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to XEQT.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to XEQT.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.
BAM.TO vs ONEX.TO Comparison
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, ONEX.TO has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$86.18, while ONEX.TO trades at CA$114.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.33, whereas ONEX.TO's P/E ratio is 13.36. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ONEX.TO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to ONEX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.
BAM.TO vs VEQT.TO Comparison
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, VEQT.TO has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$86.18, while VEQT.TO trades at CA$49.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.33, whereas VEQT.TO's P/E ratio is 21.72. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to VEQT.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to VEQT.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.
BAM.TO vs VGRO.TO Comparison
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, VGRO.TO has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$86.18, while VGRO.TO trades at CA$39.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.33, whereas VGRO.TO's P/E ratio is 21.11. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to VGRO.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to VGRO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.
BAM.TO vs CASH.TO Comparison
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, CASH.TO has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$86.18, while CASH.TO trades at CA$50.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.33, whereas CASH.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CASH.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to CASH.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.
BAM.TO vs VIU.TO Comparison
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, VIU.TO has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$86.18, while VIU.TO trades at CA$39.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.33, whereas VIU.TO's P/E ratio is 16.46. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to VIU.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to VIU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.
BAM.TO vs CSAV.TO Comparison
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, CSAV.TO has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$86.18, while CSAV.TO trades at CA$50.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.33, whereas CSAV.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CSAV.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to CSAV.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.
BAM.TO vs ZLB.TO Comparison
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, ZLB.TO has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$86.18, while ZLB.TO trades at CA$54.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.33, whereas ZLB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ZLB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to ZLB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.
BAM.TO vs ZMMK.TO Comparison
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, ZMMK.TO has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$86.18, while ZMMK.TO trades at CA$49.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.33, whereas ZMMK.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ZMMK.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to ZMMK.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.
BAM.TO vs VSP.TO Comparison
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, VSP.TO has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$86.18, while VSP.TO trades at CA$101.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.33, whereas VSP.TO's P/E ratio is 27.18. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to VSP.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to VSP.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.
BAM.TO vs CIX.TO Comparison
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, CIX.TO has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$86.18, while CIX.TO trades at CA$31.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.33, whereas CIX.TO's P/E ratio is -17.16. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CIX.TO's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to CIX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.
BAM.TO vs HXS.TO Comparison
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, HXS.TO has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$86.18, while HXS.TO trades at CA$89.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.33, whereas HXS.TO's P/E ratio is 27.44. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to HXS.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to HXS.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.
BAM.TO vs PSA.TO Comparison
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, PSA.TO has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$86.18, while PSA.TO trades at CA$50.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.33, whereas PSA.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PSA.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to PSA.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.
BAM.TO vs ZCS.TO Comparison
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, ZCS.TO has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$86.18, while ZCS.TO trades at CA$13.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.33, whereas ZCS.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ZCS.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to ZCS.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.
BAM.TO vs XSEM.TO Comparison
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, XSEM.TO has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$86.18, while XSEM.TO trades at CA$24.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.33, whereas XSEM.TO's P/E ratio is 14.77. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to XSEM.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to XSEM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.
BAM.TO vs HXT.TO Comparison
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, HXT.TO has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$86.18, while HXT.TO trades at CA$71.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.33, whereas HXT.TO's P/E ratio is 22.47. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to HXT.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to HXT.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.
BAM.TO vs QUU.TO Comparison
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, QUU.TO has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$86.18, while QUU.TO trades at CA$250.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.33, whereas QUU.TO's P/E ratio is 27.86. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to QUU.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to QUU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.
BAM.TO vs ZEB.TO Comparison
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, ZEB.TO has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$86.18, while ZEB.TO trades at CA$47.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.33, whereas ZEB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ZEB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to ZEB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.
BAM.TO vs VDY.TO Comparison
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, VDY.TO has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$86.18, while VDY.TO trades at CA$53.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.33, whereas VDY.TO's P/E ratio is 16.85. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to VDY.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to VDY.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.
BAM.TO vs XUU.TO Comparison
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, XUU.TO has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$86.18, while XUU.TO trades at CA$63.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.33, whereas XUU.TO's P/E ratio is 26.53. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to XUU.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to XUU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.
BAM.TO vs XQQ.TO Comparison
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, XQQ.TO has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$86.18, while XQQ.TO trades at CA$57.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.33, whereas XQQ.TO's P/E ratio is 35.25. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to XQQ.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to XQQ.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.
BAM.TO vs ZUE.TO Comparison
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, ZUE.TO has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$86.18, while ZUE.TO trades at CA$86.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.33, whereas ZUE.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ZUE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to ZUE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.
BAM.TO vs VBAL.TO Comparison
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, VBAL.TO has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$86.18, while VBAL.TO trades at CA$34.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.33, whereas VBAL.TO's P/E ratio is 20.61. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to VBAL.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to VBAL.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.
BAM.TO vs TPU.TO Comparison
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, TPU.TO has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$86.18, while TPU.TO trades at CA$49.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.33, whereas TPU.TO's P/E ratio is 27.86. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to TPU.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to TPU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.
BAM.TO vs TTP.TO Comparison
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, TTP.TO has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$86.18, while TTP.TO trades at CA$31.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.33, whereas TTP.TO's P/E ratio is 19.71. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to TTP.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to TTP.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.
BAM.TO vs XGRO.TO Comparison
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, XGRO.TO has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$86.18, while XGRO.TO trades at CA$32.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.33, whereas XGRO.TO's P/E ratio is 21.00. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to XGRO.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to XGRO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.
BAM.TO vs ZWB.TO Comparison
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, ZWB.TO has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$86.18, while ZWB.TO trades at CA$21.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.33, whereas ZWB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ZWB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to ZWB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.
BAM.TO vs TPE.TO Comparison
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, TPE.TO has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$86.18, while TPE.TO trades at CA$25.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.33, whereas TPE.TO's P/E ratio is 17.08. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to TPE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to TPE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.
BAM.TO vs BBUC.TO Comparison
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, BBUC.TO has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$86.18, while BBUC.TO trades at CA$43.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.33, whereas BBUC.TO's P/E ratio is -2.91. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BBUC.TO's ROE of -2.92%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is less volatile compared to BBUC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.
BAM.TO vs XAW.TO Comparison
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, XAW.TO has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$86.18, while XAW.TO trades at CA$47.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.33, whereas XAW.TO's P/E ratio is 21.90. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to XAW.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to XAW.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.
BAM.TO vs VEE.TO Comparison
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, VEE.TO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$86.18, while VEE.TO trades at CA$41.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.33, whereas VEE.TO's P/E ratio is 16.06. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to VEE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to VEE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.
BAM.TO vs XBB.TO Comparison
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, XBB.TO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$86.18, while XBB.TO trades at CA$27.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.33, whereas XBB.TO's P/E ratio is 10.89. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to XBB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to XBB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.
BAM.TO vs XDIV.TO Comparison
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, XDIV.TO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$86.18, while XDIV.TO trades at CA$32.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.33, whereas XDIV.TO's P/E ratio is 16.92. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to XDIV.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to XDIV.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.
BAM.TO vs SII.TO Comparison
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, SII.TO has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$86.18, while SII.TO trades at CA$97.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.33, whereas SII.TO's P/E ratio is 36.92. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SII.TO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is less volatile compared to SII.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.
BAM.TO vs VXC.TO Comparison
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, VXC.TO has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$86.18, while VXC.TO trades at CA$68.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.33, whereas VXC.TO's P/E ratio is 21.58. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to VXC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to VXC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.
BAM.TO vs XEC.TO Comparison
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, XEC.TO has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$86.18, while XEC.TO trades at CA$32.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.33, whereas XEC.TO's P/E ratio is 15.61. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to XEC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to XEC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.
BAM.TO vs PFMN.TO Comparison
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, PFMN.TO has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$86.18, while PFMN.TO trades at CA$15.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.33, whereas PFMN.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PFMN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to PFMN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.
BAM.TO vs ZQQ.TO Comparison
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, ZQQ.TO has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$86.18, while ZQQ.TO trades at CA$160.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.33, whereas ZQQ.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ZQQ.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to ZQQ.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.
BAM.TO vs VCE.TO Comparison
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, VCE.TO has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$86.18, while VCE.TO trades at CA$59.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.33, whereas VCE.TO's P/E ratio is 21.67. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to VCE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to VCE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.
BAM.TO vs NSCE.TO Comparison
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, NSCE.TO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$86.18, while NSCE.TO trades at CA$48.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.33, whereas NSCE.TO's P/E ratio is 24.43. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to NSCE.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to NSCE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.
BAM.TO vs XCB.TO Comparison
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, XCB.TO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$86.18, while XCB.TO trades at CA$20.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.33, whereas XCB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to XCB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to XCB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.
BAM.TO vs ZLU.TO Comparison
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, ZLU.TO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$86.18, while ZLU.TO trades at CA$55.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.33, whereas ZLU.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ZLU.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to ZLU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.
BAM.TO vs QCN.TO Comparison
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, QCN.TO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$86.18, while QCN.TO trades at CA$167.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.33, whereas QCN.TO's P/E ratio is 21.38. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to QCN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to QCN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.
BAM.TO vs XBAL.TO Comparison
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, XBAL.TO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$86.18, while XBAL.TO trades at CA$31.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.33, whereas XBAL.TO's P/E ratio is 20.47. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to XBAL.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to XBAL.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.
BAM.TO vs VGG.TO Comparison
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, VGG.TO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$86.18, while VGG.TO trades at CA$96.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.33, whereas VGG.TO's P/E ratio is 24.98. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to VGG.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to VGG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.
BAM.TO vs MNY.TO Comparison
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, MNY.TO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$86.18, while MNY.TO trades at CA$100.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.33, whereas MNY.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MNY.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to MNY.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.
BAM.TO vs QQC.TO Comparison
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, QQC.TO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$86.18, while QQC.TO trades at CA$37.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.33, whereas QQC.TO's P/E ratio is 34.04. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to QQC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to QQC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.
BAM.TO vs XEI.TO Comparison
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, XEI.TO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$86.18, while XEI.TO trades at CA$29.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.33, whereas XEI.TO's P/E ratio is 17.64. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to XEI.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to XEI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.
BAM.TO vs FIH-U.TO Comparison
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, FIH-U.TO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$86.18, while FIH-U.TO trades at CA$20.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.33, whereas FIH-U.TO's P/E ratio is 66.67. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to FIH-U.TO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to FIH-U.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.
BAM.TO vs CMR.TO Comparison
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, CMR.TO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$86.18, while CMR.TO trades at CA$50.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.33, whereas CMR.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CMR.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to CMR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.
BAM.TO vs HSAV.TO Comparison
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, HSAV.TO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$86.18, while HSAV.TO trades at CA$115.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.33, whereas HSAV.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to HSAV.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to HSAV.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.
BAM.TO vs XDV.TO Comparison
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, XDV.TO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$86.18, while XDV.TO trades at CA$34.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.33, whereas XDV.TO's P/E ratio is 14.74. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to XDV.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to XDV.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.
BAM.TO vs ZWU.TO Comparison
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, ZWU.TO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$86.18, while ZWU.TO trades at CA$11.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.33, whereas ZWU.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ZWU.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to ZWU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.
BAM.TO vs XIN.TO Comparison
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, XIN.TO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$86.18, while XIN.TO trades at CA$39.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.33, whereas XIN.TO's P/E ratio is 17.60. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to XIN.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to XIN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.
BAM.TO vs CACB.TO Comparison
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, CACB.TO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$86.18, while CACB.TO trades at CA$19.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.33, whereas CACB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CACB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to CACB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.
BAM.TO vs XFH.TO Comparison
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, XFH.TO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$86.18, while XFH.TO trades at CA$35.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.33, whereas XFH.TO's P/E ratio is 16.94. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to XFH.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to XFH.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.
BAM.TO vs XFN.TO Comparison
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, XFN.TO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$86.18, while XFN.TO trades at CA$66.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.33, whereas XFN.TO's P/E ratio is 17.26. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to XFN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to XFN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.
BAM.TO vs CYB.TO Comparison
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, CYB.TO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$86.18, while CYB.TO trades at CA$82.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.33, whereas CYB.TO's P/E ratio is 11.20. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CYB.TO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to CYB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.
BAM.TO vs ISIF.TO Comparison
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, ISIF.TO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$86.18, while ISIF.TO trades at CA$12.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.33, whereas ISIF.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ISIF.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to ISIF.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.
BAM.TO vs CBIL.TO Comparison
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, CBIL.TO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$86.18, while CBIL.TO trades at CA$50.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.33, whereas CBIL.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CBIL.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to CBIL.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.
BAM.TO vs ZWC.TO Comparison
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, ZWC.TO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$86.18, while ZWC.TO trades at CA$18.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.33, whereas ZWC.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ZWC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to ZWC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.
BAM.TO vs HXCN.TO Comparison
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, HXCN.TO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$86.18, while HXCN.TO trades at CA$45.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.33, whereas HXCN.TO's P/E ratio is 19.86. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to HXCN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to HXCN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.
BAM.TO vs XSH.TO Comparison
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, XSH.TO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$86.18, while XSH.TO trades at CA$19.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.33, whereas XSH.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to XSH.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to XSH.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.
BAM.TO vs UNC.TO Comparison
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, UNC.TO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$86.18, while UNC.TO trades at CA$14.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.33, whereas UNC.TO's P/E ratio is 7.14. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to UNC.TO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to UNC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.
BAM.TO vs XGB.TO Comparison
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, XGB.TO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$86.18, while XGB.TO trades at CA$19.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.33, whereas XGB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to XGB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to XGB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.
BAM.TO vs ZEM.TO Comparison
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, ZEM.TO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$86.18, while ZEM.TO trades at CA$24.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.33, whereas ZEM.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ZEM.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to ZEM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.
BAM.TO vs HMAX.TO Comparison
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, HMAX.TO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$86.18, while HMAX.TO trades at CA$14.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.33, whereas HMAX.TO's P/E ratio is 15.54. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to HMAX.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to HMAX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.
BAM.TO vs ZGB.TO Comparison
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, ZGB.TO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$86.18, while ZGB.TO trades at CA$44.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.33, whereas ZGB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ZGB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to ZGB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.
BAM.TO vs ZPR.TO Comparison
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, ZPR.TO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$86.18, while ZPR.TO trades at CA$11.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.33, whereas ZPR.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ZPR.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to ZPR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.
BAM.TO vs EQL.TO Comparison
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, EQL.TO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$86.18, while EQL.TO trades at CA$38.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.33, whereas EQL.TO's P/E ratio is 22.45. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to EQL.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to EQL.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.
BAM.TO vs FCUV.TO Comparison
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, FCUV.TO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$86.18, while FCUV.TO trades at CA$20.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.33, whereas FCUV.TO's P/E ratio is 17.15. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to FCUV.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to FCUV.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.
BAM.TO vs XWD.TO Comparison
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, XWD.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$86.18, while XWD.TO trades at CA$101.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.33, whereas XWD.TO's P/E ratio is 23.77. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to XWD.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to XWD.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.
BAM.TO vs RIIN.TO Comparison
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, RIIN.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$86.18, while RIIN.TO trades at CA$22.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.33, whereas RIIN.TO's P/E ratio is 20.50. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to RIIN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to RIIN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.
BAM.TO vs FCUQ.TO Comparison
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, FCUQ.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$86.18, while FCUQ.TO trades at CA$65.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.33, whereas FCUQ.TO's P/E ratio is 26.99. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to FCUQ.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to FCUQ.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.
BAM.TO vs XEG.TO Comparison
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, XEG.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$86.18, while XEG.TO trades at CA$17.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.33, whereas XEG.TO's P/E ratio is 11.63. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to XEG.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to XEG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.
BAM.TO vs ZUQ.TO Comparison
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, ZUQ.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$86.18, while ZUQ.TO trades at CA$89.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.33, whereas ZUQ.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ZUQ.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to ZUQ.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.
BAM.TO vs VUS.TO Comparison
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, VUS.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$86.18, while VUS.TO trades at CA$109.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.33, whereas VUS.TO's P/E ratio is 26.37. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to VUS.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to VUS.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.
BAM.TO vs QDX.TO Comparison
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, QDX.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$86.18, while QDX.TO trades at CA$135.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.33, whereas QDX.TO's P/E ratio is 17.03. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to QDX.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to QDX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.
BAM.TO vs DCU.TO Comparison
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, DCU.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$86.18, while DCU.TO trades at CA$17.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.33, whereas DCU.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to DCU.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to DCU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.
BAM.TO vs ZDV.TO Comparison
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, ZDV.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$86.18, while ZDV.TO trades at CA$24.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.33, whereas ZDV.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ZDV.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to ZDV.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.
BAM.TO vs BND.TO Comparison
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, BND.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$86.18, while BND.TO trades at CA$17.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.33, whereas BND.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BND.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to BND.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.
BAM.TO vs ZDM.TO Comparison
BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, ZDM.TO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$86.18, while ZDM.TO trades at CA$32.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.33, whereas ZDM.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ZDM.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to ZDM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.