Loading...

Brookfield Asset Management Ltd.

BAM.TOTSX
Financial Services
Asset Management
CA$86.18
CA$1.32(1.56%)

Brookfield Asset Management Ltd. BAM.TO Peers

See (BAM.TO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.

Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management Industry

Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.

SymbolPriceChange %Market CapP/E RatioEPSDividend Yield
BAM.TOCA$86.18+1.56%139B46.33CA$1.86+2.65%
BLK.NECA$29.25-0.17%233.1B26.83CA$1.09N/A
BN.TOCA$92.03-0.10%151.7B230.05CA$0.40+0.52%
VFV.TOCA$154.02+0.42%23.5B26.98CA$5.71+0.99%
ZSP.TOCA$94.98+0.44%18.9BN/AN/A+0.88%
PHYS.TOCA$35.27-0.23%16.4B3.74CA$9.44N/A
XIU.TOCA$41.22-0.12%14.5B20.35CA$2.03+2.73%
XEF.TOCA$43.24-0.35%12.9B17.13CA$2.52+2.58%
VUN.TOCA$115.83+0.42%12.1B26.19CA$4.42+0.91%
IGM.TOCA$46.40+1.98%11B11.69CA$3.97+4.84%
Showing 1 to 10 of 100 results
1

Stock Comparison

Select a stock to compare (requires JavaScript). Showing default comparison.

BAM.TO vs BLK.NE Comparison

BAM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAM.TO stands at 139B. In comparison, BLK.NE has a market cap of 233.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM.TO is priced at CA$86.18, while BLK.NE trades at CA$29.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.33, whereas BLK.NE's P/E ratio is 26.83. In terms of profitability, BAM.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BLK.NE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM.TO is more volatile compared to BLK.NE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.TO.

Stock Price Comparison

Loading...

Frequently Asked Questions

;