Alexco Resource Corp.
Alexco Resource Corp. AXU.TO Peers
See (AXU.TO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Other Precious Metals Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AXU.TO | $0.65 | +4.84% | N/A | -5.24 | -$0.12 | N/A |
| TFPM.TO | $27.77 | -0.11% | 5.58B | 694.25 | $0.04 | +1.10% |
| GMIN.TO | $18.32 | +0.22% | 4.13B | 35.23 | $0.52 | N/A |
| CGG.TO | $9.58 | +3.46% | 3.80B | 43.55 | $0.22 | +1.17% |
| GATO.TO | $21.59 | +5.73% | 1.50B | 32.22 | $0.67 | N/A |
| ARIS.TO | $7.89 | -0.25% | 1.41B | 34.30 | $0.23 | N/A |
| EDR.TO | $4.55 | -2.57% | 1.32B | -13.00 | -$0.35 | N/A |
| PPTA.TO | $16.66 | -1.94% | 1.19B | -41.65 | -$0.40 | N/A |
| SLS.TO | $4.81 | +5.71% | 785.16M | -7.07 | -$0.68 | N/A |
| ASM.TO | $3.74 | -0.53% | 541.42M | 46.75 | $0.08 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
AXU.TO vs TFPM.TO Comparison
AXU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AXU.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, TFPM.TO has a market cap of 5.58B. Regarding current trading prices, AXU.TO is priced at $0.65, while TFPM.TO trades at $27.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AXU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -5.24, whereas TFPM.TO's P/E ratio is 694.25. In terms of profitability, AXU.TO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to TFPM.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AXU.TO is more volatile compared to TFPM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AXU.TO.
AXU.TO vs GMIN.TO Comparison
AXU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AXU.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, GMIN.TO has a market cap of 4.13B. Regarding current trading prices, AXU.TO is priced at $0.65, while GMIN.TO trades at $18.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AXU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -5.24, whereas GMIN.TO's P/E ratio is 35.23. In terms of profitability, AXU.TO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to GMIN.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AXU.TO is more volatile compared to GMIN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AXU.TO.
AXU.TO vs CGG.TO Comparison
AXU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AXU.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, CGG.TO has a market cap of 3.80B. Regarding current trading prices, AXU.TO is priced at $0.65, while CGG.TO trades at $9.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AXU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -5.24, whereas CGG.TO's P/E ratio is 43.55. In terms of profitability, AXU.TO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CGG.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AXU.TO is less volatile compared to CGG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AXU.TO.
AXU.TO vs GATO.TO Comparison
AXU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AXU.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, GATO.TO has a market cap of 1.50B. Regarding current trading prices, AXU.TO is priced at $0.65, while GATO.TO trades at $21.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AXU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -5.24, whereas GATO.TO's P/E ratio is 32.22. In terms of profitability, AXU.TO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to GATO.TO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AXU.TO is less volatile compared to GATO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AXU.TO.
AXU.TO vs ARIS.TO Comparison
AXU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AXU.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, ARIS.TO has a market cap of 1.41B. Regarding current trading prices, AXU.TO is priced at $0.65, while ARIS.TO trades at $7.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AXU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -5.24, whereas ARIS.TO's P/E ratio is 34.30. In terms of profitability, AXU.TO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ARIS.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AXU.TO is more volatile compared to ARIS.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AXU.TO.
AXU.TO vs EDR.TO Comparison
AXU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AXU.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, EDR.TO has a market cap of 1.32B. Regarding current trading prices, AXU.TO is priced at $0.65, while EDR.TO trades at $4.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AXU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -5.24, whereas EDR.TO's P/E ratio is -13.00. In terms of profitability, AXU.TO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to EDR.TO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AXU.TO is more volatile compared to EDR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AXU.TO.
AXU.TO vs PPTA.TO Comparison
AXU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AXU.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, PPTA.TO has a market cap of 1.19B. Regarding current trading prices, AXU.TO is priced at $0.65, while PPTA.TO trades at $16.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AXU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -5.24, whereas PPTA.TO's P/E ratio is -41.65. In terms of profitability, AXU.TO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PPTA.TO's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, AXU.TO is more volatile compared to PPTA.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AXU.TO.
AXU.TO vs SLS.TO Comparison
AXU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AXU.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, SLS.TO has a market cap of 785.16M. Regarding current trading prices, AXU.TO is priced at $0.65, while SLS.TO trades at $4.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AXU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -5.24, whereas SLS.TO's P/E ratio is -7.07. In terms of profitability, AXU.TO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SLS.TO's ROE of -14.57%. Regarding short-term risk, AXU.TO is more volatile compared to SLS.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AXU.TO.
AXU.TO vs ASM.TO Comparison
AXU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AXU.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, ASM.TO has a market cap of 541.42M. Regarding current trading prices, AXU.TO is priced at $0.65, while ASM.TO trades at $3.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AXU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -5.24, whereas ASM.TO's P/E ratio is 46.75. In terms of profitability, AXU.TO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ASM.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AXU.TO is more volatile compared to ASM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AXU.TO.
AXU.TO vs GGD.TO Comparison
AXU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AXU.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, GGD.TO has a market cap of 538.03M. Regarding current trading prices, AXU.TO is priced at $0.65, while GGD.TO trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AXU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -5.24, whereas GGD.TO's P/E ratio is 170.00. In terms of profitability, AXU.TO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to GGD.TO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AXU.TO is more volatile compared to GGD.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AXU.TO.
AXU.TO vs MUX.TO Comparison
AXU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AXU.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, MUX.TO has a market cap of 537.18M. Regarding current trading prices, AXU.TO is priced at $0.65, while MUX.TO trades at $9.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AXU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -5.24, whereas MUX.TO's P/E ratio is -12.44. In terms of profitability, AXU.TO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MUX.TO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AXU.TO is more volatile compared to MUX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AXU.TO.
AXU.TO vs ABRA.TO Comparison
AXU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AXU.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, ABRA.TO has a market cap of 474.42M. Regarding current trading prices, AXU.TO is priced at $0.65, while ABRA.TO trades at $3.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AXU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -5.24, whereas ABRA.TO's P/E ratio is -14.81. In terms of profitability, AXU.TO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ABRA.TO's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, AXU.TO is more volatile compared to ABRA.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AXU.TO.
AXU.TO vs NUAG.TO Comparison
AXU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AXU.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, NUAG.TO has a market cap of 289.83M. Regarding current trading prices, AXU.TO is priced at $0.65, while NUAG.TO trades at $1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AXU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -5.24, whereas NUAG.TO's P/E ratio is -42.25. In terms of profitability, AXU.TO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NUAG.TO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AXU.TO is more volatile compared to NUAG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AXU.TO.
AXU.TO vs ALLI.NE Comparison
AXU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AXU.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, ALLI.NE has a market cap of 276.63M. Regarding current trading prices, AXU.TO is priced at $0.65, while ALLI.NE trades at $1.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AXU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -5.24, whereas ALLI.NE's P/E ratio is -24.50. In terms of profitability, AXU.TO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ALLI.NE's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, AXU.TO is more volatile compared to ALLI.NE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AXU.TO.
AXU.TO vs VOXR.TO Comparison
AXU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AXU.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, VOXR.TO has a market cap of 237.53M. Regarding current trading prices, AXU.TO is priced at $0.65, while VOXR.TO trades at $4.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AXU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -5.24, whereas VOXR.TO's P/E ratio is -117.00. In terms of profitability, AXU.TO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to VOXR.TO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AXU.TO is more volatile compared to VOXR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AXU.TO.
AXU.TO vs HSLV.CN Comparison
AXU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AXU.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, HSLV.CN has a market cap of 230.94M. Regarding current trading prices, AXU.TO is priced at $0.65, while HSLV.CN trades at $2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AXU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -5.24, whereas HSLV.CN's P/E ratio is -73.33. In terms of profitability, AXU.TO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to HSLV.CN's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, AXU.TO is more volatile compared to HSLV.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AXU.TO.
AXU.TO vs PTM.TO Comparison
AXU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AXU.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, PTM.TO has a market cap of 162.87M. Regarding current trading prices, AXU.TO is priced at $0.65, while PTM.TO trades at $1.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AXU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -5.24, whereas PTM.TO's P/E ratio is -22.29. In terms of profitability, AXU.TO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PTM.TO's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AXU.TO is more volatile compared to PTM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AXU.TO.
AXU.TO vs LUC.TO Comparison
AXU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AXU.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, LUC.TO has a market cap of 110.70M. Regarding current trading prices, AXU.TO is priced at $0.65, while LUC.TO trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AXU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -5.24, whereas LUC.TO's P/E ratio is 1.63. In terms of profitability, AXU.TO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to LUC.TO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AXU.TO is more volatile compared to LUC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AXU.TO.
AXU.TO vs XAM.TO Comparison
AXU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AXU.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, XAM.TO has a market cap of 86.05M. Regarding current trading prices, AXU.TO is priced at $0.65, while XAM.TO trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AXU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -5.24, whereas XAM.TO's P/E ratio is -4.50. In terms of profitability, AXU.TO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to XAM.TO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AXU.TO is more volatile compared to XAM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AXU.TO.
AXU.TO vs DMET.NE Comparison
AXU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AXU.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, DMET.NE has a market cap of 80.39M. Regarding current trading prices, AXU.TO is priced at $0.65, while DMET.NE trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AXU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -5.24, whereas DMET.NE's P/E ratio is -3.75. In terms of profitability, AXU.TO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to DMET.NE's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, AXU.TO is more volatile compared to DMET.NE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AXU.TO.
AXU.TO vs ORV.TO Comparison
AXU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AXU.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, ORV.TO has a market cap of 79.24M. Regarding current trading prices, AXU.TO is priced at $0.65, while ORV.TO trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AXU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -5.24, whereas ORV.TO's P/E ratio is 19.33. In terms of profitability, AXU.TO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ORV.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AXU.TO is more volatile compared to ORV.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AXU.TO.
AXU.TO vs SM.V Comparison
AXU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AXU.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, SM.V has a market cap of 64.13M. Regarding current trading prices, AXU.TO is priced at $0.65, while SM.V trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AXU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -5.24, whereas SM.V's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, AXU.TO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SM.V's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AXU.TO is more volatile compared to SM.V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AXU.TO.
AXU.TO vs DIAM.TO Comparison
AXU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AXU.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, DIAM.TO has a market cap of 40.14M. Regarding current trading prices, AXU.TO is priced at $0.65, while DIAM.TO trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AXU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -5.24, whereas DIAM.TO's P/E ratio is -6.50. In terms of profitability, AXU.TO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to DIAM.TO's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, AXU.TO and DIAM.TO have similar daily volatility (8.00).
AXU.TO vs PAU.CN Comparison
AXU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AXU.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, PAU.CN has a market cap of 28.33M. Regarding current trading prices, AXU.TO is priced at $0.65, while PAU.CN trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AXU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -5.24, whereas PAU.CN's P/E ratio is -22.00. In terms of profitability, AXU.TO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PAU.CN's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, AXU.TO is more volatile compared to PAU.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AXU.TO.
AXU.TO vs AUCU.CN Comparison
AXU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AXU.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, AUCU.CN has a market cap of 26.34M. Regarding current trading prices, AXU.TO is priced at $0.65, while AUCU.CN trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AXU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -5.24, whereas AUCU.CN's P/E ratio is -8.67. In terms of profitability, AXU.TO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to AUCU.CN's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, AXU.TO is more volatile compared to AUCU.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AXU.TO.
AXU.TO vs ELR.TO Comparison
AXU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AXU.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, ELR.TO has a market cap of 26.32M. Regarding current trading prices, AXU.TO is priced at $0.65, while ELR.TO trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AXU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -5.24, whereas ELR.TO's P/E ratio is -1.62. In terms of profitability, AXU.TO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ELR.TO's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AXU.TO is more volatile compared to ELR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AXU.TO.
AXU.TO vs EMPS.CN Comparison
AXU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AXU.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, EMPS.CN has a market cap of 25.28M. Regarding current trading prices, AXU.TO is priced at $0.65, while EMPS.CN trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AXU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -5.24, whereas EMPS.CN's P/E ratio is -7.33. In terms of profitability, AXU.TO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to EMPS.CN's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AXU.TO is more volatile compared to EMPS.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AXU.TO.
AXU.TO vs ESAU.CN Comparison
AXU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AXU.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, ESAU.CN has a market cap of 25.02M. Regarding current trading prices, AXU.TO is priced at $0.65, while ESAU.CN trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AXU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -5.24, whereas ESAU.CN's P/E ratio is -4.18. In terms of profitability, AXU.TO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ESAU.CN's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AXU.TO is more volatile compared to ESAU.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AXU.TO.
AXU.TO vs CUAU.CN Comparison
AXU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AXU.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, CUAU.CN has a market cap of 22.61M. Regarding current trading prices, AXU.TO is priced at $0.65, while CUAU.CN trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AXU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -5.24, whereas CUAU.CN's P/E ratio is -11.50. In terms of profitability, AXU.TO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CUAU.CN's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, AXU.TO is more volatile compared to CUAU.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AXU.TO.
AXU.TO vs NVRO.CN Comparison
AXU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AXU.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, NVRO.CN has a market cap of 21.59M. Regarding current trading prices, AXU.TO is priced at $0.65, while NVRO.CN trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AXU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -5.24, whereas NVRO.CN's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, AXU.TO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NVRO.CN's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, AXU.TO is less volatile compared to NVRO.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AXU.TO.
AXU.TO vs FTEL.CN Comparison
AXU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AXU.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, FTEL.CN has a market cap of 14.95M. Regarding current trading prices, AXU.TO is priced at $0.65, while FTEL.CN trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AXU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -5.24, whereas FTEL.CN's P/E ratio is -6.50. In terms of profitability, AXU.TO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to FTEL.CN's ROE of +11.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AXU.TO is more volatile compared to FTEL.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AXU.TO.
AXU.TO vs ATHA.CN Comparison
AXU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AXU.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, ATHA.CN has a market cap of 12.81M. Regarding current trading prices, AXU.TO is priced at $0.65, while ATHA.CN trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AXU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -5.24, whereas ATHA.CN's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, AXU.TO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ATHA.CN's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AXU.TO is more volatile compared to ATHA.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AXU.TO.
AXU.TO vs MPVD.TO Comparison
AXU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AXU.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, MPVD.TO has a market cap of 12.74M. Regarding current trading prices, AXU.TO is priced at $0.65, while MPVD.TO trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AXU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -5.24, whereas MPVD.TO's P/E ratio is 0.29. In terms of profitability, AXU.TO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MPVD.TO's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AXU.TO is less volatile compared to MPVD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AXU.TO.
AXU.TO vs AUAG.CN Comparison
AXU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AXU.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, AUAG.CN has a market cap of 11.75M. Regarding current trading prices, AXU.TO is priced at $0.65, while AUAG.CN trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AXU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -5.24, whereas AUAG.CN's P/E ratio is 1.28. In terms of profitability, AXU.TO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to AUAG.CN's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, AXU.TO is more volatile compared to AUAG.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AXU.TO.
AXU.TO vs CLCO.V Comparison
AXU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AXU.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, CLCO.V has a market cap of 9.69M. Regarding current trading prices, AXU.TO is priced at $0.65, while CLCO.V trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AXU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -5.24, whereas CLCO.V's P/E ratio is -1.71. In terms of profitability, AXU.TO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CLCO.V's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AXU.TO is more volatile compared to CLCO.V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AXU.TO.
AXU.TO vs CUPR.CN Comparison
AXU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AXU.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, CUPR.CN has a market cap of 9.27M. Regarding current trading prices, AXU.TO is priced at $0.65, while CUPR.CN trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AXU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -5.24, whereas CUPR.CN's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, AXU.TO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CUPR.CN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AXU.TO is more volatile compared to CUPR.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AXU.TO.
AXU.TO vs IGLD.CN Comparison
AXU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AXU.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, IGLD.CN has a market cap of 8.14M. Regarding current trading prices, AXU.TO is priced at $0.65, while IGLD.CN trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AXU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -5.24, whereas IGLD.CN's P/E ratio is -1.38. In terms of profitability, AXU.TO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to IGLD.CN's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. AXU.TO has daily volatility of 8.00 and IGLD.CN has daily volatility of N/A.
AXU.TO vs CAM.V Comparison
AXU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AXU.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, CAM.V has a market cap of 6.03M. Regarding current trading prices, AXU.TO is priced at $0.65, while CAM.V trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AXU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -5.24, whereas CAM.V's P/E ratio is -0.71. In terms of profitability, AXU.TO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CAM.V's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AXU.TO is more volatile compared to CAM.V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AXU.TO.
AXU.TO vs LECR.CN Comparison
AXU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AXU.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, LECR.CN has a market cap of 5.91M. Regarding current trading prices, AXU.TO is priced at $0.65, while LECR.CN trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AXU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -5.24, whereas LECR.CN's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, AXU.TO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to LECR.CN's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AXU.TO is more volatile compared to LECR.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AXU.TO.
AXU.TO vs CFE.CN Comparison
AXU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AXU.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, CFE.CN has a market cap of 4.93M. Regarding current trading prices, AXU.TO is priced at $0.65, while CFE.CN trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AXU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -5.24, whereas CFE.CN's P/E ratio is -1.05. In terms of profitability, AXU.TO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CFE.CN's ROE of -1.48%. Regarding short-term risk, AXU.TO is more volatile compared to CFE.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AXU.TO.
AXU.TO vs HML.CN Comparison
AXU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AXU.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, HML.CN has a market cap of 3.92M. Regarding current trading prices, AXU.TO is priced at $0.65, while HML.CN trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AXU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -5.24, whereas HML.CN's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, AXU.TO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to HML.CN's ROE of -16.52%. Regarding short-term risk, AXU.TO is more volatile compared to HML.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AXU.TO.
AXU.TO vs WDGY.CN Comparison
AXU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AXU.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, WDGY.CN has a market cap of 3.15M. Regarding current trading prices, AXU.TO is priced at $0.65, while WDGY.CN trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AXU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -5.24, whereas WDGY.CN's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, AXU.TO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to WDGY.CN's ROE of -2.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AXU.TO is more volatile compared to WDGY.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AXU.TO.
AXU.TO vs AUMN.TO Comparison
AXU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AXU.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, AUMN.TO has a market cap of 3.09M. Regarding current trading prices, AXU.TO is priced at $0.65, while AUMN.TO trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AXU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -5.24, whereas AUMN.TO's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, AXU.TO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to AUMN.TO's ROE of +5.93%. Regarding short-term risk, AXU.TO is more volatile compared to AUMN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AXU.TO.
AXU.TO vs CRC.CN Comparison
AXU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AXU.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, CRC.CN has a market cap of 3.06M. Regarding current trading prices, AXU.TO is priced at $0.65, while CRC.CN trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AXU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -5.24, whereas CRC.CN's P/E ratio is -1.10. In terms of profitability, AXU.TO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CRC.CN's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AXU.TO is more volatile compared to CRC.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AXU.TO.
AXU.TO vs ACDX.CN Comparison
AXU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AXU.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, ACDX.CN has a market cap of 2.97M. Regarding current trading prices, AXU.TO is priced at $0.65, while ACDX.CN trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AXU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -5.24, whereas ACDX.CN's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, AXU.TO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ACDX.CN's ROE of -1.39%. Regarding short-term risk, AXU.TO is more volatile compared to ACDX.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AXU.TO.
AXU.TO vs LTHM.CN Comparison
AXU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AXU.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, LTHM.CN has a market cap of 2.79M. Regarding current trading prices, AXU.TO is priced at $0.65, while LTHM.CN trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AXU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -5.24, whereas LTHM.CN's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, AXU.TO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to LTHM.CN's ROE of +7.93%. Regarding short-term risk, AXU.TO is more volatile compared to LTHM.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AXU.TO.
AXU.TO vs ORGN.CN Comparison
AXU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AXU.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, ORGN.CN has a market cap of 2.28M. Regarding current trading prices, AXU.TO is priced at $0.65, while ORGN.CN trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AXU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -5.24, whereas ORGN.CN's P/E ratio is -0.71. In terms of profitability, AXU.TO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ORGN.CN's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, AXU.TO is less volatile compared to ORGN.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AXU.TO.
AXU.TO vs MLKM.CN Comparison
AXU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AXU.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, MLKM.CN has a market cap of 2.16M. Regarding current trading prices, AXU.TO is priced at $0.65, while MLKM.CN trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AXU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -5.24, whereas MLKM.CN's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, AXU.TO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MLKM.CN's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AXU.TO is more volatile compared to MLKM.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AXU.TO.
AXU.TO vs TAI.CN Comparison
AXU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AXU.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, TAI.CN has a market cap of 2.14M. Regarding current trading prices, AXU.TO is priced at $0.65, while TAI.CN trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AXU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -5.24, whereas TAI.CN's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, AXU.TO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to TAI.CN's ROE of -4.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AXU.TO is more volatile compared to TAI.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AXU.TO.
AXU.TO vs PNGC.CN Comparison
AXU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AXU.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, PNGC.CN has a market cap of 1.91M. Regarding current trading prices, AXU.TO is priced at $0.65, while PNGC.CN trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AXU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -5.24, whereas PNGC.CN's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, AXU.TO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PNGC.CN's ROE of +0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, AXU.TO is more volatile compared to PNGC.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AXU.TO.
AXU.TO vs GLDS.CN Comparison
AXU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AXU.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, GLDS.CN has a market cap of 1.77M. Regarding current trading prices, AXU.TO is priced at $0.65, while GLDS.CN trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AXU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -5.24, whereas GLDS.CN's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, AXU.TO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to GLDS.CN's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AXU.TO is more volatile compared to GLDS.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AXU.TO.
AXU.TO vs TAUR.CN Comparison
AXU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AXU.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, TAUR.CN has a market cap of 1.13M. Regarding current trading prices, AXU.TO is priced at $0.65, while TAUR.CN trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AXU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -5.24, whereas TAUR.CN's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, AXU.TO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to TAUR.CN's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AXU.TO is more volatile compared to TAUR.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AXU.TO.
AXU.TO vs PMS.CN Comparison
AXU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AXU.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, PMS.CN has a market cap of 1.07M. Regarding current trading prices, AXU.TO is priced at $0.65, while PMS.CN trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AXU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -5.24, whereas PMS.CN's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, AXU.TO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PMS.CN's ROE of +177.38%. Regarding short-term risk, AXU.TO is more volatile compared to PMS.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AXU.TO.
AXU.TO vs FABL.CN Comparison
AXU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AXU.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, FABL.CN has a market cap of 869807.00. Regarding current trading prices, AXU.TO is priced at $0.65, while FABL.CN trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AXU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -5.24, whereas FABL.CN's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, AXU.TO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to FABL.CN's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, AXU.TO is more volatile compared to FABL.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AXU.TO.
AXU.TO vs TGLD.CN Comparison
AXU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AXU.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, TGLD.CN has a market cap of 868875.00. Regarding current trading prices, AXU.TO is priced at $0.65, while TGLD.CN trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AXU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -5.24, whereas TGLD.CN's P/E ratio is -1.75. In terms of profitability, AXU.TO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to TGLD.CN's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AXU.TO is less volatile compared to TGLD.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AXU.TO.
AXU.TO vs MUSK.CN Comparison
AXU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AXU.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, MUSK.CN has a market cap of 813930.00. Regarding current trading prices, AXU.TO is priced at $0.65, while MUSK.CN trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AXU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -5.24, whereas MUSK.CN's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, AXU.TO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MUSK.CN's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, AXU.TO is more volatile compared to MUSK.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AXU.TO.
AXU.TO vs NVR.CN Comparison
AXU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AXU.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, NVR.CN has a market cap of 719250.00. Regarding current trading prices, AXU.TO is priced at $0.65, while NVR.CN trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AXU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -5.24, whereas NVR.CN's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, AXU.TO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NVR.CN's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, AXU.TO is more volatile compared to NVR.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AXU.TO.
AXU.TO vs SAND.CN Comparison
AXU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AXU.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, SAND.CN has a market cap of 505421.00. Regarding current trading prices, AXU.TO is priced at $0.65, while SAND.CN trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AXU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -5.24, whereas SAND.CN's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, AXU.TO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SAND.CN's ROE of -20.83%. Regarding short-term risk, AXU.TO is less volatile compared to SAND.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AXU.TO.
AXU.TO vs AGE.CN Comparison
AXU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AXU.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, AGE.CN has a market cap of 327375.00. Regarding current trading prices, AXU.TO is priced at $0.65, while AGE.CN trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AXU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -5.24, whereas AGE.CN's P/E ratio is -1.25. In terms of profitability, AXU.TO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to AGE.CN's ROE of -1.63%. Regarding short-term risk, AXU.TO is more volatile compared to AGE.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AXU.TO.