AWL Agri Business Ltd.
AWL Agri Business Ltd. (AWL.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (AWL.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Packaged Foods Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AWL.NS | ₹194.63 | -3.08% | 258.4B | 24.81 | ₹8.05 | N/A |
| NESTLEIND.NS | ₹1,433.90 | -1.76% | 2.8T | 78.56 | ₹18.21 | +0.84% |
| NESTLEIND.BO | ₹1,432.55 | -1.86% | 2.8T | 84.48 | ₹16.93 | +0.84% |
| BRITANNIA.NS | ₹5,319.50 | -0.99% | 1.3T | 51.43 | ₹105.12 | +1.39% |
| BRITANNIA.BO | ₹5,324.00 | -0.87% | 1.3T | 56.07 | ₹96.39 | +1.39% |
| TATACONSUM.BO | ₹1,234.20 | +0.43% | 1.2T | 79.06 | ₹15.61 | +0.67% |
| TATACONSUM.NS | ₹1,223.90 | -0.36% | 1.2T | 79.10 | ₹15.60 | +0.67% |
| PATANJALI.BO | ₹460.15 | +2.32% | 500.6B | 30.37 | ₹15.15 | +1.34% |
| PATANJALI.NS | ₹456.20 | +1.39% | 500.3B | 30.37 | ₹15.14 | +1.34% |
| AWL.BO | ₹194.30 | -3.12% | 258.6B | 24.86 | ₹8.04 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
AWL.NS vs NESTLEIND.NS Comparison May 2026
AWL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWL.NS stands at 258.4B. In comparison, NESTLEIND.NS has a market cap of 2.8T. Regarding current trading prices, AWL.NS is priced at ₹194.63, while NESTLEIND.NS trades at ₹1,433.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.81, whereas NESTLEIND.NS's P/E ratio is 78.56. In terms of profitability, AWL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NESTLEIND.NS's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, AWL.NS is less volatile compared to NESTLEIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWL.NS.Check NESTLEIND.NS's competition here
AWL.NS vs NESTLEIND.BO Comparison May 2026
AWL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWL.NS stands at 258.4B. In comparison, NESTLEIND.BO has a market cap of 2.8T. Regarding current trading prices, AWL.NS is priced at ₹194.63, while NESTLEIND.BO trades at ₹1,432.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.81, whereas NESTLEIND.BO's P/E ratio is 84.48. In terms of profitability, AWL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NESTLEIND.BO's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, AWL.NS and NESTLEIND.BO have similar daily volatility (1.84).Check NESTLEIND.BO's competition here
AWL.NS vs BRITANNIA.NS Comparison May 2026
AWL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWL.NS stands at 258.4B. In comparison, BRITANNIA.NS has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, AWL.NS is priced at ₹194.63, while BRITANNIA.NS trades at ₹5,319.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.81, whereas BRITANNIA.NS's P/E ratio is 51.43. In terms of profitability, AWL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BRITANNIA.NS's ROE of +0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, AWL.NS is more volatile compared to BRITANNIA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWL.NS.Check BRITANNIA.NS's competition here
AWL.NS vs BRITANNIA.BO Comparison May 2026
AWL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWL.NS stands at 258.4B. In comparison, BRITANNIA.BO has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, AWL.NS is priced at ₹194.63, while BRITANNIA.BO trades at ₹5,324.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.81, whereas BRITANNIA.BO's P/E ratio is 56.07. In terms of profitability, AWL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BRITANNIA.BO's ROE of +0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, AWL.NS is less volatile compared to BRITANNIA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWL.NS.Check BRITANNIA.BO's competition here
AWL.NS vs TATACONSUM.BO Comparison May 2026
AWL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWL.NS stands at 258.4B. In comparison, TATACONSUM.BO has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, AWL.NS is priced at ₹194.63, while TATACONSUM.BO trades at ₹1,234.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.81, whereas TATACONSUM.BO's P/E ratio is 79.06. In terms of profitability, AWL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TATACONSUM.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AWL.NS is more volatile compared to TATACONSUM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWL.NS.Check TATACONSUM.BO's competition here
AWL.NS vs TATACONSUM.NS Comparison May 2026
AWL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWL.NS stands at 258.4B. In comparison, TATACONSUM.NS has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, AWL.NS is priced at ₹194.63, while TATACONSUM.NS trades at ₹1,223.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.81, whereas TATACONSUM.NS's P/E ratio is 79.10. In terms of profitability, AWL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TATACONSUM.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AWL.NS is more volatile compared to TATACONSUM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWL.NS.Check TATACONSUM.NS's competition here
AWL.NS vs PATANJALI.BO Comparison May 2026
AWL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWL.NS stands at 258.4B. In comparison, PATANJALI.BO has a market cap of 500.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AWL.NS is priced at ₹194.63, while PATANJALI.BO trades at ₹460.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.81, whereas PATANJALI.BO's P/E ratio is 30.37. In terms of profitability, AWL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PATANJALI.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AWL.NS is less volatile compared to PATANJALI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWL.NS.Check PATANJALI.BO's competition here
AWL.NS vs PATANJALI.NS Comparison May 2026
AWL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWL.NS stands at 258.4B. In comparison, PATANJALI.NS has a market cap of 500.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AWL.NS is priced at ₹194.63, while PATANJALI.NS trades at ₹456.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.81, whereas PATANJALI.NS's P/E ratio is 30.37. In terms of profitability, AWL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PATANJALI.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AWL.NS is less volatile compared to PATANJALI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWL.NS.Check PATANJALI.NS's competition here
AWL.NS vs AWL.BO Comparison May 2026
AWL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWL.NS stands at 258.4B. In comparison, AWL.BO has a market cap of 258.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AWL.NS is priced at ₹194.63, while AWL.BO trades at ₹194.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.81, whereas AWL.BO's P/E ratio is 24.86. In terms of profitability, AWL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AWL.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AWL.NS is less volatile compared to AWL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWL.NS.Check AWL.BO's competition here
AWL.NS vs HATSUN.NS Comparison May 2026
AWL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWL.NS stands at 258.4B. In comparison, HATSUN.NS has a market cap of 209.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AWL.NS is priced at ₹194.63, while HATSUN.NS trades at ₹918.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.81, whereas HATSUN.NS's P/E ratio is 60.25. In terms of profitability, AWL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HATSUN.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AWL.NS is less volatile compared to HATSUN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWL.NS.Check HATSUN.NS's competition here
AWL.NS vs HATSUN.BO Comparison May 2026
AWL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWL.NS stands at 258.4B. In comparison, HATSUN.BO has a market cap of 209.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AWL.NS is priced at ₹194.63, while HATSUN.BO trades at ₹919.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.81, whereas HATSUN.BO's P/E ratio is 60.17. In terms of profitability, AWL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HATSUN.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AWL.NS is less volatile compared to HATSUN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWL.NS.Check HATSUN.BO's competition here
AWL.NS vs AVANTIFEED.BO Comparison May 2026
AWL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWL.NS stands at 258.4B. In comparison, AVANTIFEED.BO has a market cap of 180.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AWL.NS is priced at ₹194.63, while AVANTIFEED.BO trades at ₹1,323.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.81, whereas AVANTIFEED.BO's P/E ratio is 23.43. In terms of profitability, AWL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AVANTIFEED.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AWL.NS is less volatile compared to AVANTIFEED.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWL.NS.Check AVANTIFEED.BO's competition here
AWL.NS vs AVANTIFEED.NS Comparison May 2026
AWL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWL.NS stands at 258.4B. In comparison, AVANTIFEED.NS has a market cap of 180.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AWL.NS is priced at ₹194.63, while AVANTIFEED.NS trades at ₹1,253.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.81, whereas AVANTIFEED.NS's P/E ratio is 23.43. In terms of profitability, AWL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AVANTIFEED.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AWL.NS is less volatile compared to AVANTIFEED.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWL.NS.Check AVANTIFEED.NS's competition here
AWL.NS vs BIKAJI.BO Comparison May 2026
AWL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWL.NS stands at 258.4B. In comparison, BIKAJI.BO has a market cap of 167.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AWL.NS is priced at ₹194.63, while BIKAJI.BO trades at ₹657.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.81, whereas BIKAJI.BO's P/E ratio is 67.99. In terms of profitability, AWL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BIKAJI.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AWL.NS is more volatile compared to BIKAJI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWL.NS.Check BIKAJI.BO's competition here
AWL.NS vs BIKAJI.NS Comparison May 2026
AWL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWL.NS stands at 258.4B. In comparison, BIKAJI.NS has a market cap of 167.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AWL.NS is priced at ₹194.63, while BIKAJI.NS trades at ₹658.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.81, whereas BIKAJI.NS's P/E ratio is 67.92. In terms of profitability, AWL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BIKAJI.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AWL.NS is less volatile compared to BIKAJI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWL.NS.Check BIKAJI.NS's competition here
AWL.NS vs CCL.BO Comparison May 2026
AWL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWL.NS stands at 258.4B. In comparison, CCL.BO has a market cap of 148.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AWL.NS is priced at ₹194.63, while CCL.BO trades at ₹1,116.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.81, whereas CCL.BO's P/E ratio is 39.66. In terms of profitability, AWL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CCL.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AWL.NS is less volatile compared to CCL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWL.NS.Check CCL.BO's competition here
AWL.NS vs CCL.NS Comparison May 2026
AWL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWL.NS stands at 258.4B. In comparison, CCL.NS has a market cap of 148.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AWL.NS is priced at ₹194.63, while CCL.NS trades at ₹1,090.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.81, whereas CCL.NS's P/E ratio is 38.33. In terms of profitability, AWL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CCL.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AWL.NS is less volatile compared to CCL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWL.NS.Check CCL.NS's competition here
AWL.NS vs LTFOODS.BO Comparison May 2026
AWL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWL.NS stands at 258.4B. In comparison, LTFOODS.BO has a market cap of 142.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AWL.NS is priced at ₹194.63, while LTFOODS.BO trades at ₹409.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.81, whereas LTFOODS.BO's P/E ratio is 22.71. In terms of profitability, AWL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LTFOODS.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AWL.NS is less volatile compared to LTFOODS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWL.NS.Check LTFOODS.BO's competition here
AWL.NS vs LTFOODS.NS Comparison May 2026
AWL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWL.NS stands at 258.4B. In comparison, LTFOODS.NS has a market cap of 142.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AWL.NS is priced at ₹194.63, while LTFOODS.NS trades at ₹397.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.81, whereas LTFOODS.NS's P/E ratio is 22.74. In terms of profitability, AWL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LTFOODS.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AWL.NS is less volatile compared to LTFOODS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWL.NS.Check LTFOODS.NS's competition here
AWL.NS vs BBTC.BO Comparison May 2026
AWL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWL.NS stands at 258.4B. In comparison, BBTC.BO has a market cap of 106.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AWL.NS is priced at ₹194.63, while BBTC.BO trades at ₹1,482.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.81, whereas BBTC.BO's P/E ratio is 9.40. In terms of profitability, AWL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BBTC.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AWL.NS is less volatile compared to BBTC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWL.NS.Check BBTC.BO's competition here
AWL.NS vs BBTC.NS Comparison May 2026
AWL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWL.NS stands at 258.4B. In comparison, BBTC.NS has a market cap of 106.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AWL.NS is priced at ₹194.63, while BBTC.NS trades at ₹1,486.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.81, whereas BBTC.NS's P/E ratio is 8.55. In terms of profitability, AWL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BBTC.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AWL.NS is less volatile compared to BBTC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWL.NS.Check BBTC.NS's competition here
AWL.NS vs ORKLAINDIA.NS Comparison May 2026
AWL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWL.NS stands at 258.4B. In comparison, ORKLAINDIA.NS has a market cap of 86.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AWL.NS is priced at ₹194.63, while ORKLAINDIA.NS trades at ₹625.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.81, whereas ORKLAINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 34.91. In terms of profitability, AWL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ORKLAINDIA.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AWL.NS is less volatile compared to ORKLAINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWL.NS.Check ORKLAINDIA.NS's competition here
AWL.NS vs MANORAMA.NS Comparison May 2026
AWL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWL.NS stands at 258.4B. In comparison, MANORAMA.NS has a market cap of 78B. Regarding current trading prices, AWL.NS is priced at ₹194.63, while MANORAMA.NS trades at ₹1,358.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.81, whereas MANORAMA.NS's P/E ratio is 36.31. In terms of profitability, AWL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MANORAMA.NS's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, AWL.NS is less volatile compared to MANORAMA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWL.NS.Check MANORAMA.NS's competition here
AWL.NS vs MANORAMA.BO Comparison May 2026
AWL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWL.NS stands at 258.4B. In comparison, MANORAMA.BO has a market cap of 77.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AWL.NS is priced at ₹194.63, while MANORAMA.BO trades at ₹1,301.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.81, whereas MANORAMA.BO's P/E ratio is 36.17. In terms of profitability, AWL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MANORAMA.BO's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, AWL.NS is less volatile compared to MANORAMA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWL.NS.Check MANORAMA.BO's competition here
AWL.NS vs KRBL.BO Comparison May 2026
AWL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWL.NS stands at 258.4B. In comparison, KRBL.BO has a market cap of 77.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AWL.NS is priced at ₹194.63, while KRBL.BO trades at ₹339.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.81, whereas KRBL.BO's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, AWL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KRBL.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AWL.NS is less volatile compared to KRBL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWL.NS.Check KRBL.BO's competition here
AWL.NS vs KRBL.NS Comparison May 2026
AWL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWL.NS stands at 258.4B. In comparison, KRBL.NS has a market cap of 77.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AWL.NS is priced at ₹194.63, while KRBL.NS trades at ₹322.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.81, whereas KRBL.NS's P/E ratio is 11.99. In terms of profitability, AWL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KRBL.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AWL.NS is less volatile compared to KRBL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWL.NS.Check KRBL.NS's competition here
AWL.NS vs GAEL.BO Comparison May 2026
AWL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWL.NS stands at 258.4B. In comparison, GAEL.BO has a market cap of 74.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AWL.NS is priced at ₹194.63, while GAEL.BO trades at ₹160.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.81, whereas GAEL.BO's P/E ratio is 24.61. In terms of profitability, AWL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GAEL.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AWL.NS is less volatile compared to GAEL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWL.NS.Check GAEL.BO's competition here
AWL.NS vs GAEL.NS Comparison May 2026
AWL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWL.NS stands at 258.4B. In comparison, GAEL.NS has a market cap of 74.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AWL.NS is priced at ₹194.63, while GAEL.NS trades at ₹160.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.81, whereas GAEL.NS's P/E ratio is 24.55. In terms of profitability, AWL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GAEL.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AWL.NS is less volatile compared to GAEL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWL.NS.Check GAEL.NS's competition here
AWL.NS vs DAAWAT.NS Comparison May 2026
AWL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWL.NS stands at 258.4B. In comparison, DAAWAT.NS has a market cap of 65.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AWL.NS is priced at ₹194.63, while DAAWAT.NS trades at ₹189.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.81, whereas DAAWAT.NS's P/E ratio is 12.32. In terms of profitability, AWL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DAAWAT.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AWL.NS is less volatile compared to DAAWAT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWL.NS.Check DAAWAT.NS's competition here
AWL.NS vs TATACOFFEE.BO Comparison May 2026
AWL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWL.NS stands at 258.4B. In comparison, TATACOFFEE.BO has a market cap of 64.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AWL.NS is priced at ₹194.63, while TATACOFFEE.BO trades at ₹344.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.81, whereas TATACOFFEE.BO's P/E ratio is 35.84. In terms of profitability, AWL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TATACOFFEE.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AWL.NS is less volatile compared to TATACOFFEE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWL.NS.Check TATACOFFEE.BO's competition here
AWL.NS vs TATACOFFEE.NS Comparison May 2026
AWL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWL.NS stands at 258.4B. In comparison, TATACOFFEE.NS has a market cap of 62.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AWL.NS is priced at ₹194.63, while TATACOFFEE.NS trades at ₹334.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.81, whereas TATACOFFEE.NS's P/E ratio is 34.79. In terms of profitability, AWL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TATACOFFEE.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. AWL.NS has daily volatility of 1.84 and TATACOFFEE.NS has daily volatility of N/A.Check TATACOFFEE.NS's competition here
AWL.NS vs HNDFDS.BO Comparison May 2026
AWL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWL.NS stands at 258.4B. In comparison, HNDFDS.BO has a market cap of 62.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AWL.NS is priced at ₹194.63, while HNDFDS.BO trades at ₹512.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.81, whereas HNDFDS.BO's P/E ratio is 45.46. In terms of profitability, AWL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HNDFDS.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AWL.NS is more volatile compared to HNDFDS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWL.NS.Check HNDFDS.BO's competition here
AWL.NS vs HNDFDS.NS Comparison May 2026
AWL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWL.NS stands at 258.4B. In comparison, HNDFDS.NS has a market cap of 62.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AWL.NS is priced at ₹194.63, while HNDFDS.NS trades at ₹514.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.81, whereas HNDFDS.NS's P/E ratio is 45.27. In terms of profitability, AWL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HNDFDS.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AWL.NS is more volatile compared to HNDFDS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWL.NS.Check HNDFDS.NS's competition here
AWL.NS vs BECTORFOOD.BO Comparison May 2026
AWL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWL.NS stands at 258.4B. In comparison, BECTORFOOD.BO has a market cap of 55.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AWL.NS is priced at ₹194.63, while BECTORFOOD.BO trades at ₹181.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.81, whereas BECTORFOOD.BO's P/E ratio is 39.99. In terms of profitability, AWL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BECTORFOOD.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AWL.NS is less volatile compared to BECTORFOOD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWL.NS.Check BECTORFOOD.BO's competition here
AWL.NS vs BECTORFOOD.NS Comparison May 2026
AWL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWL.NS stands at 258.4B. In comparison, BECTORFOOD.NS has a market cap of 55.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AWL.NS is priced at ₹194.63, while BECTORFOOD.NS trades at ₹179.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.81, whereas BECTORFOOD.NS's P/E ratio is 39.88. In terms of profitability, AWL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BECTORFOOD.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AWL.NS is less volatile compared to BECTORFOOD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWL.NS.Check BECTORFOOD.NS's competition here
AWL.NS vs TASTYBIT.BO Comparison May 2026
AWL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWL.NS stands at 258.4B. In comparison, TASTYBIT.BO has a market cap of 36.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AWL.NS is priced at ₹194.63, while TASTYBIT.BO trades at ₹14,140.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.81, whereas TASTYBIT.BO's P/E ratio is 105.07. In terms of profitability, AWL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TASTYBIT.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AWL.NS is less volatile compared to TASTYBIT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWL.NS.Check TASTYBIT.BO's competition here
AWL.NS vs GOPAL.NS Comparison May 2026
AWL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWL.NS stands at 258.4B. In comparison, GOPAL.NS has a market cap of 36.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AWL.NS is priced at ₹194.63, while GOPAL.NS trades at ₹282.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.81, whereas GOPAL.NS's P/E ratio is 880.76. In terms of profitability, AWL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GOPAL.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AWL.NS is less volatile compared to GOPAL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWL.NS.Check GOPAL.NS's competition here
AWL.NS vs GOKULAGRO.BO Comparison May 2026
AWL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWL.NS stands at 258.4B. In comparison, GOKULAGRO.BO has a market cap of 35.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AWL.NS is priced at ₹194.63, while GOKULAGRO.BO trades at ₹232.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.81, whereas GOKULAGRO.BO's P/E ratio is 23.70. In terms of profitability, AWL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GOKULAGRO.BO's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, AWL.NS is less volatile compared to GOKULAGRO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWL.NS.Check GOKULAGRO.BO's competition here
AWL.NS vs GOKULAGRO.NS Comparison May 2026
AWL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWL.NS stands at 258.4B. In comparison, GOKULAGRO.NS has a market cap of 35.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AWL.NS is priced at ₹194.63, while GOKULAGRO.NS trades at ₹233.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.81, whereas GOKULAGRO.NS's P/E ratio is 23.65. In terms of profitability, AWL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GOKULAGRO.NS's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, AWL.NS is less volatile compared to GOKULAGRO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWL.NS.Check GOKULAGRO.NS's competition here
AWL.NS vs ZYDUSWELL.NS Comparison May 2026
AWL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWL.NS stands at 258.4B. In comparison, ZYDUSWELL.NS has a market cap of 32B. Regarding current trading prices, AWL.NS is priced at ₹194.63, while ZYDUSWELL.NS trades at ₹499.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.81, whereas ZYDUSWELL.NS's P/E ratio is 77.37. In terms of profitability, AWL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ZYDUSWELL.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AWL.NS is less volatile compared to ZYDUSWELL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWL.NS.Check ZYDUSWELL.NS's competition here
AWL.NS vs ZYDUSWELL.BO Comparison May 2026
AWL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWL.NS stands at 258.4B. In comparison, ZYDUSWELL.BO has a market cap of 31.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AWL.NS is priced at ₹194.63, while ZYDUSWELL.BO trades at ₹501.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.81, whereas ZYDUSWELL.BO's P/E ratio is 77.28. In terms of profitability, AWL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ZYDUSWELL.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AWL.NS is less volatile compared to ZYDUSWELL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWL.NS.Check ZYDUSWELL.BO's competition here
AWL.NS vs GRMOVER.NS Comparison May 2026
AWL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWL.NS stands at 258.4B. In comparison, GRMOVER.NS has a market cap of 31.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AWL.NS is priced at ₹194.63, while GRMOVER.NS trades at ₹169.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.81, whereas GRMOVER.NS's P/E ratio is 53.86. In terms of profitability, AWL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GRMOVER.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AWL.NS is less volatile compared to GRMOVER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWL.NS.Check GRMOVER.NS's competition here
AWL.NS vs GRMOVER.BO Comparison May 2026
AWL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWL.NS stands at 258.4B. In comparison, GRMOVER.BO has a market cap of 31.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AWL.NS is priced at ₹194.63, while GRMOVER.BO trades at ₹170.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.81, whereas GRMOVER.BO's P/E ratio is 53.58. In terms of profitability, AWL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GRMOVER.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AWL.NS is less volatile compared to GRMOVER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWL.NS.Check GRMOVER.BO's competition here
AWL.NS vs HERITGFOOD.NS Comparison May 2026
AWL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWL.NS stands at 258.4B. In comparison, HERITGFOOD.NS has a market cap of 30.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AWL.NS is priced at ₹194.63, while HERITGFOOD.NS trades at ₹322.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.81, whereas HERITGFOOD.NS's P/E ratio is 18.72. In terms of profitability, AWL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HERITGFOOD.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AWL.NS is less volatile compared to HERITGFOOD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWL.NS.Check HERITGFOOD.NS's competition here
AWL.NS vs HERITGFOOD.BO Comparison May 2026
AWL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWL.NS stands at 258.4B. In comparison, HERITGFOOD.BO has a market cap of 30.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AWL.NS is priced at ₹194.63, while HERITGFOOD.BO trades at ₹321.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.81, whereas HERITGFOOD.BO's P/E ratio is 18.71. In terms of profitability, AWL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HERITGFOOD.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AWL.NS is less volatile compared to HERITGFOOD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWL.NS.Check HERITGFOOD.BO's competition here
AWL.NS vs VADILALIND.NS Comparison May 2026
AWL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWL.NS stands at 258.4B. In comparison, VADILALIND.NS has a market cap of 30.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AWL.NS is priced at ₹194.63, while VADILALIND.NS trades at ₹4,102.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.81, whereas VADILALIND.NS's P/E ratio is 24.71. In terms of profitability, AWL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VADILALIND.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AWL.NS is less volatile compared to VADILALIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWL.NS.Check VADILALIND.NS's competition here
AWL.NS vs VADILALIND.BO Comparison May 2026
AWL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWL.NS stands at 258.4B. In comparison, VADILALIND.BO has a market cap of 30.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AWL.NS is priced at ₹194.63, while VADILALIND.BO trades at ₹4,136.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.81, whereas VADILALIND.BO's P/E ratio is 24.71. In terms of profitability, AWL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VADILALIND.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AWL.NS is less volatile compared to VADILALIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWL.NS.Check VADILALIND.BO's competition here
AWL.NS vs ATFL.NS Comparison May 2026
AWL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWL.NS stands at 258.4B. In comparison, ATFL.NS has a market cap of 29.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AWL.NS is priced at ₹194.63, while ATFL.NS trades at ₹785.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.81, whereas ATFL.NS's P/E ratio is 344.56. In terms of profitability, AWL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ATFL.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AWL.NS is less volatile compared to ATFL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWL.NS.Check ATFL.NS's competition here
AWL.NS vs ATFL.BO Comparison May 2026
AWL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWL.NS stands at 258.4B. In comparison, ATFL.BO has a market cap of 29.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AWL.NS is priced at ₹194.63, while ATFL.BO trades at ₹784.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.81, whereas ATFL.BO's P/E ratio is 342.53. In terms of profitability, AWL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ATFL.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AWL.NS is less volatile compared to ATFL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWL.NS.Check ATFL.BO's competition here
AWL.NS vs ADFFOODS.NS Comparison May 2026
AWL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWL.NS stands at 258.4B. In comparison, ADFFOODS.NS has a market cap of 29.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AWL.NS is priced at ₹194.63, while ADFFOODS.NS trades at ₹261.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.81, whereas ADFFOODS.NS's P/E ratio is 36.60. In terms of profitability, AWL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ADFFOODS.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AWL.NS is less volatile compared to ADFFOODS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWL.NS.Check ADFFOODS.NS's competition here
AWL.NS vs ADFFOODS.BO Comparison May 2026
AWL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWL.NS stands at 258.4B. In comparison, ADFFOODS.BO has a market cap of 29.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AWL.NS is priced at ₹194.63, while ADFFOODS.BO trades at ₹265.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.81, whereas ADFFOODS.BO's P/E ratio is 36.55. In terms of profitability, AWL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ADFFOODS.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AWL.NS is less volatile compared to ADFFOODS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWL.NS.Check ADFFOODS.BO's competition here
AWL.NS vs BNAGROCHEM.BO Comparison May 2026
AWL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWL.NS stands at 258.4B. In comparison, BNAGROCHEM.BO has a market cap of 28.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AWL.NS is priced at ₹194.63, while BNAGROCHEM.BO trades at ₹296.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.81, whereas BNAGROCHEM.BO's P/E ratio is 28.70. In terms of profitability, AWL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BNAGROCHEM.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AWL.NS is less volatile compared to BNAGROCHEM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWL.NS.Check BNAGROCHEM.BO's competition here
AWL.NS vs PARAGMILK.BO Comparison May 2026
AWL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWL.NS stands at 258.4B. In comparison, PARAGMILK.BO has a market cap of 27.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AWL.NS is priced at ₹194.63, while PARAGMILK.BO trades at ₹218.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.81, whereas PARAGMILK.BO's P/E ratio is 21.45. In terms of profitability, AWL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PARAGMILK.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AWL.NS is less volatile compared to PARAGMILK.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWL.NS.Check PARAGMILK.BO's competition here
AWL.NS vs PARAGMILK.NS Comparison May 2026
AWL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWL.NS stands at 258.4B. In comparison, PARAGMILK.NS has a market cap of 27.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AWL.NS is priced at ₹194.63, while PARAGMILK.NS trades at ₹214.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.81, whereas PARAGMILK.NS's P/E ratio is 21.42. In terms of profitability, AWL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PARAGMILK.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AWL.NS is less volatile compared to PARAGMILK.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWL.NS.Check PARAGMILK.NS's competition here
AWL.NS vs SUNDROP.BO Comparison May 2026
AWL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWL.NS stands at 258.4B. In comparison, SUNDROP.BO has a market cap of 25.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AWL.NS is priced at ₹194.63, while SUNDROP.BO trades at ₹675.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.81, whereas SUNDROP.BO's P/E ratio is -16.57. In terms of profitability, AWL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SUNDROP.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AWL.NS is more volatile compared to SUNDROP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWL.NS.Check SUNDROP.BO's competition here
AWL.NS vs SUNDROP.NS Comparison May 2026
AWL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWL.NS stands at 258.4B. In comparison, SUNDROP.NS has a market cap of 25.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AWL.NS is priced at ₹194.63, while SUNDROP.NS trades at ₹679.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.81, whereas SUNDROP.NS's P/E ratio is -16.57. In terms of profitability, AWL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SUNDROP.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AWL.NS is less volatile compared to SUNDROP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWL.NS.Check SUNDROP.NS's competition here
AWL.NS vs DIAMONDYD.BO Comparison May 2026
AWL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWL.NS stands at 258.4B. In comparison, DIAMONDYD.BO has a market cap of 24.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AWL.NS is priced at ₹194.63, while DIAMONDYD.BO trades at ₹975.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.81, whereas DIAMONDYD.BO's P/E ratio is 245.85. In terms of profitability, AWL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DIAMONDYD.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AWL.NS is more volatile compared to DIAMONDYD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWL.NS.Check DIAMONDYD.BO's competition here
AWL.NS vs DIAMONDYD.NS Comparison May 2026
AWL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWL.NS stands at 258.4B. In comparison, DIAMONDYD.NS has a market cap of 24B. Regarding current trading prices, AWL.NS is priced at ₹194.63, while DIAMONDYD.NS trades at ₹975.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.81, whereas DIAMONDYD.NS's P/E ratio is 244.37. In terms of profitability, AWL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DIAMONDYD.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AWL.NS is less volatile compared to DIAMONDYD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWL.NS.Check DIAMONDYD.NS's competition here
AWL.NS vs DFMFOODS.NS Comparison May 2026
AWL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWL.NS stands at 258.4B. In comparison, DFMFOODS.NS has a market cap of 23.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AWL.NS is priced at ₹194.63, while DFMFOODS.NS trades at ₹461.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.81, whereas DFMFOODS.NS's P/E ratio is -47.58. In terms of profitability, AWL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DFMFOODS.NS's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AWL.NS is more volatile compared to DFMFOODS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWL.NS.Check DFMFOODS.NS's competition here
AWL.NS vs TASTYBITE.NS Comparison May 2026
AWL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWL.NS stands at 258.4B. In comparison, TASTYBITE.NS has a market cap of 19.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AWL.NS is priced at ₹194.63, while TASTYBITE.NS trades at ₹7,311.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.81, whereas TASTYBITE.NS's P/E ratio is 55.01. In terms of profitability, AWL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TASTYBITE.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AWL.NS is less volatile compared to TASTYBITE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWL.NS.Check TASTYBITE.NS's competition here
AWL.NS vs CLSEL.NS Comparison May 2026
AWL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWL.NS stands at 258.4B. In comparison, CLSEL.NS has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AWL.NS is priced at ₹194.63, while CLSEL.NS trades at ₹261.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.81, whereas CLSEL.NS's P/E ratio is 13.24. In terms of profitability, AWL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CLSEL.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AWL.NS is less volatile compared to CLSEL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWL.NS.Check CLSEL.NS's competition here
AWL.NS vs CLSEL.BO Comparison May 2026
AWL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWL.NS stands at 258.4B. In comparison, CLSEL.BO has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AWL.NS is priced at ₹194.63, while CLSEL.BO trades at ₹261.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.81, whereas CLSEL.BO's P/E ratio is 13.22. In terms of profitability, AWL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CLSEL.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AWL.NS is less volatile compared to CLSEL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWL.NS.Check CLSEL.BO's competition here
AWL.NS vs HMAAGRO.BO Comparison May 2026
AWL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWL.NS stands at 258.4B. In comparison, HMAAGRO.BO has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AWL.NS is priced at ₹194.63, while HMAAGRO.BO trades at ₹23.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.81, whereas HMAAGRO.BO's P/E ratio is 7.15. In terms of profitability, AWL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HMAAGRO.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AWL.NS is less volatile compared to HMAAGRO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWL.NS.Check HMAAGRO.BO's competition here
AWL.NS vs HMAAGRO.NS Comparison May 2026
AWL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWL.NS stands at 258.4B. In comparison, HMAAGRO.NS has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AWL.NS is priced at ₹194.63, while HMAAGRO.NS trades at ₹23.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.81, whereas HMAAGRO.NS's P/E ratio is 7.11. In terms of profitability, AWL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HMAAGRO.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AWL.NS is less volatile compared to HMAAGRO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWL.NS.Check HMAAGRO.NS's competition here
AWL.NS vs SKMEGGPROD.BO Comparison May 2026
AWL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWL.NS stands at 258.4B. In comparison, SKMEGGPROD.BO has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AWL.NS is priced at ₹194.63, while SKMEGGPROD.BO trades at ₹176.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.81, whereas SKMEGGPROD.BO's P/E ratio is 12.33. In terms of profitability, AWL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SKMEGGPROD.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, AWL.NS is less volatile compared to SKMEGGPROD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWL.NS.Check SKMEGGPROD.BO's competition here
AWL.NS vs SKMEGGPROD.NS Comparison May 2026
AWL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWL.NS stands at 258.4B. In comparison, SKMEGGPROD.NS has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AWL.NS is priced at ₹194.63, while SKMEGGPROD.NS trades at ₹177.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.81, whereas SKMEGGPROD.NS's P/E ratio is 12.27. In terms of profitability, AWL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SKMEGGPROD.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, AWL.NS is less volatile compared to SKMEGGPROD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWL.NS.Check SKMEGGPROD.NS's competition here
AWL.NS vs DVL.BO Comparison May 2026
AWL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWL.NS stands at 258.4B. In comparison, DVL.BO has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AWL.NS is priced at ₹194.63, while DVL.BO trades at ₹229.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.81, whereas DVL.BO's P/E ratio is -56.14. In terms of profitability, AWL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DVL.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AWL.NS is less volatile compared to DVL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWL.NS.Check DVL.BO's competition here
AWL.NS vs DVL.NS Comparison May 2026
AWL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWL.NS stands at 258.4B. In comparison, DVL.NS has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AWL.NS is priced at ₹194.63, while DVL.NS trades at ₹229.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.81, whereas DVL.NS's P/E ratio is -56.26. In terms of profitability, AWL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DVL.NS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AWL.NS is less volatile compared to DVL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWL.NS.Check DVL.NS's competition here
AWL.NS vs REGAAL.NS Comparison May 2026
AWL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWL.NS stands at 258.4B. In comparison, REGAAL.NS has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, AWL.NS is priced at ₹194.63, while REGAAL.NS trades at ₹75.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.81, whereas REGAAL.NS's P/E ratio is 15.96. In terms of profitability, AWL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to REGAAL.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AWL.NS is less volatile compared to REGAAL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWL.NS.Check REGAAL.NS's competition here
AWL.NS vs KRISHIVAL.NS Comparison May 2026
AWL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWL.NS stands at 258.4B. In comparison, KRISHIVAL.NS has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AWL.NS is priced at ₹194.63, while KRISHIVAL.NS trades at ₹377.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.81, whereas KRISHIVAL.NS's P/E ratio is 42.89. In terms of profitability, AWL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KRISHIVAL.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AWL.NS is more volatile compared to KRISHIVAL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWL.NS.Check KRISHIVAL.NS's competition here
AWL.NS vs MUKKA.NS Comparison May 2026
AWL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWL.NS stands at 258.4B. In comparison, MUKKA.NS has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AWL.NS is priced at ₹194.63, while MUKKA.NS trades at ₹22.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.81, whereas MUKKA.NS's P/E ratio is 15.71. In terms of profitability, AWL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MUKKA.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AWL.NS is less volatile compared to MUKKA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWL.NS.Check MUKKA.NS's competition here
AWL.NS vs MCLEODRUSS.NS Comparison May 2026
AWL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWL.NS stands at 258.4B. In comparison, MCLEODRUSS.NS has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AWL.NS is priced at ₹194.63, while MCLEODRUSS.NS trades at ₹65.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.81, whereas MCLEODRUSS.NS's P/E ratio is -2.91. In terms of profitability, AWL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MCLEODRUSS.NS's ROE of -1.77%. Regarding short-term risk, AWL.NS is more volatile compared to MCLEODRUSS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWL.NS.Check MCLEODRUSS.NS's competition here
AWL.NS vs MCLEODRUSS.BO Comparison May 2026
AWL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWL.NS stands at 258.4B. In comparison, MCLEODRUSS.BO has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AWL.NS is priced at ₹194.63, while MCLEODRUSS.BO trades at ₹65.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.81, whereas MCLEODRUSS.BO's P/E ratio is -2.35. In terms of profitability, AWL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MCLEODRUSS.BO's ROE of -1.77%. Regarding short-term risk, AWL.NS is more volatile compared to MCLEODRUSS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWL.NS.Check MCLEODRUSS.BO's competition here
AWL.NS vs EIFFL.NS Comparison May 2026
AWL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWL.NS stands at 258.4B. In comparison, EIFFL.NS has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AWL.NS is priced at ₹194.63, while EIFFL.NS trades at ₹225.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.81, whereas EIFFL.NS's P/E ratio is 102.07. In terms of profitability, AWL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EIFFL.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AWL.NS is less volatile compared to EIFFL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWL.NS.Check EIFFL.NS's competition here
AWL.NS vs SARVESHWAR.BO Comparison May 2026
AWL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWL.NS stands at 258.4B. In comparison, SARVESHWAR.BO has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AWL.NS is priced at ₹194.63, while SARVESHWAR.BO trades at ₹3.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.81, whereas SARVESHWAR.BO's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, AWL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SARVESHWAR.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AWL.NS is less volatile compared to SARVESHWAR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWL.NS.Check SARVESHWAR.BO's competition here
AWL.NS vs SARVESHWAR.NS Comparison May 2026
AWL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWL.NS stands at 258.4B. In comparison, SARVESHWAR.NS has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AWL.NS is priced at ₹194.63, while SARVESHWAR.NS trades at ₹3.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.81, whereas SARVESHWAR.NS's P/E ratio is 12.90. In terms of profitability, AWL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SARVESHWAR.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AWL.NS is less volatile compared to SARVESHWAR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWL.NS.Check SARVESHWAR.NS's competition here
AWL.NS vs SCPL.NS Comparison May 2026
AWL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWL.NS stands at 258.4B. In comparison, SCPL.NS has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AWL.NS is priced at ₹194.63, while SCPL.NS trades at ₹430.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.81, whereas SCPL.NS's P/E ratio is 29.06. In terms of profitability, AWL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SCPL.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AWL.NS is less volatile compared to SCPL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWL.NS.Check SCPL.NS's competition here
AWL.NS vs SCPL.BO Comparison May 2026
AWL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWL.NS stands at 258.4B. In comparison, SCPL.BO has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AWL.NS is priced at ₹194.63, while SCPL.BO trades at ₹435.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.81, whereas SCPL.BO's P/E ratio is 28.78. In terms of profitability, AWL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SCPL.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AWL.NS is less volatile compared to SCPL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWL.NS.Check SCPL.BO's competition here
AWL.NS vs KRITINUT.NS Comparison May 2026
AWL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWL.NS stands at 258.4B. In comparison, KRITINUT.NS has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AWL.NS is priced at ₹194.63, while KRITINUT.NS trades at ₹81.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.81, whereas KRITINUT.NS's P/E ratio is 13.16. In terms of profitability, AWL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KRITINUT.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AWL.NS is less volatile compared to KRITINUT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWL.NS.Check KRITINUT.NS's competition here
AWL.NS vs KRITINUT.BO Comparison May 2026
AWL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWL.NS stands at 258.4B. In comparison, KRITINUT.BO has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AWL.NS is priced at ₹194.63, while KRITINUT.BO trades at ₹81.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.81, whereas KRITINUT.BO's P/E ratio is 13.12. In terms of profitability, AWL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KRITINUT.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AWL.NS is more volatile compared to KRITINUT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWL.NS.Check KRITINUT.BO's competition here
AWL.NS vs GOKUL.NS Comparison May 2026
AWL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWL.NS stands at 258.4B. In comparison, GOKUL.NS has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AWL.NS is priced at ₹194.63, while GOKUL.NS trades at ₹40.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.81, whereas GOKUL.NS's P/E ratio is 22.01. In terms of profitability, AWL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GOKUL.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AWL.NS is less volatile compared to GOKUL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWL.NS.Check GOKUL.NS's competition here
AWL.NS vs GOKUL.BO Comparison May 2026
AWL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWL.NS stands at 258.4B. In comparison, GOKUL.BO has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AWL.NS is priced at ₹194.63, while GOKUL.BO trades at ₹42.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.81, whereas GOKUL.BO's P/E ratio is 21.85. In terms of profitability, AWL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GOKUL.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AWL.NS is less volatile compared to GOKUL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWL.NS.Check GOKUL.BO's competition here
AWL.NS vs COASTCORP.NS Comparison May 2026
AWL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWL.NS stands at 258.4B. In comparison, COASTCORP.NS has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AWL.NS is priced at ₹194.63, while COASTCORP.NS trades at ₹60.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.81, whereas COASTCORP.NS's P/E ratio is 26.84. In terms of profitability, AWL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to COASTCORP.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AWL.NS is less volatile compared to COASTCORP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWL.NS.Check COASTCORP.NS's competition here
AWL.NS vs COASTCORP.BO Comparison May 2026
AWL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWL.NS stands at 258.4B. In comparison, COASTCORP.BO has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AWL.NS is priced at ₹194.63, while COASTCORP.BO trades at ₹61.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.81, whereas COASTCORP.BO's P/E ratio is 26.71. In terms of profitability, AWL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to COASTCORP.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AWL.NS is less volatile compared to COASTCORP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWL.NS.Check COASTCORP.BO's competition here
AWL.NS vs FOODSIN.BO Comparison May 2026
AWL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWL.NS stands at 258.4B. In comparison, FOODSIN.BO has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AWL.NS is priced at ₹194.63, while FOODSIN.BO trades at ₹54.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.81, whereas FOODSIN.BO's P/E ratio is 13.20. In terms of profitability, AWL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FOODSIN.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AWL.NS is less volatile compared to FOODSIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWL.NS.Check FOODSIN.BO's competition here
AWL.NS vs FOODSIN.NS Comparison May 2026
AWL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWL.NS stands at 258.4B. In comparison, FOODSIN.NS has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AWL.NS is priced at ₹194.63, while FOODSIN.NS trades at ₹54.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.81, whereas FOODSIN.NS's P/E ratio is 13.16. In terms of profitability, AWL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FOODSIN.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AWL.NS is less volatile compared to FOODSIN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWL.NS.Check FOODSIN.NS's competition here
AWL.NS vs MEGASTAR.BO Comparison May 2026
AWL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWL.NS stands at 258.4B. In comparison, MEGASTAR.BO has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AWL.NS is priced at ₹194.63, while MEGASTAR.BO trades at ₹303.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.81, whereas MEGASTAR.BO's P/E ratio is 33.71. In terms of profitability, AWL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MEGASTAR.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AWL.NS is more volatile compared to MEGASTAR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWL.NS.Check MEGASTAR.BO's competition here
AWL.NS vs MEGASTAR.NS Comparison May 2026
AWL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWL.NS stands at 258.4B. In comparison, MEGASTAR.NS has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AWL.NS is priced at ₹194.63, while MEGASTAR.NS trades at ₹302.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.81, whereas MEGASTAR.NS's P/E ratio is 33.37. In terms of profitability, AWL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MEGASTAR.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AWL.NS is less volatile compared to MEGASTAR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWL.NS.Check MEGASTAR.NS's competition here
AWL.NS vs JAYSHREETEA.BO Comparison May 2026
AWL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWL.NS stands at 258.4B. In comparison, JAYSHREETEA.BO has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AWL.NS is priced at ₹194.63, while JAYSHREETEA.BO trades at ₹107.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.81, whereas JAYSHREETEA.BO's P/E ratio is -2.74. In terms of profitability, AWL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to JAYSHREETEA.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AWL.NS is less volatile compared to JAYSHREETEA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWL.NS.Check JAYSHREETEA.BO's competition here
AWL.NS vs WATERBASE.BO Comparison May 2026
AWL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWL.NS stands at 258.4B. In comparison, WATERBASE.BO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, AWL.NS is priced at ₹194.63, while WATERBASE.BO trades at ₹47.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.81, whereas WATERBASE.BO's P/E ratio is -11.96. In terms of profitability, AWL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WATERBASE.BO's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AWL.NS is less volatile compared to WATERBASE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWL.NS.Check WATERBASE.BO's competition here
AWL.NS vs WATERBASE.NS Comparison May 2026
AWL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWL.NS stands at 258.4B. In comparison, WATERBASE.NS has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, AWL.NS is priced at ₹194.63, while WATERBASE.NS trades at ₹75.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.81, whereas WATERBASE.NS's P/E ratio is -53.19. In terms of profitability, AWL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WATERBASE.NS's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AWL.NS is less volatile compared to WATERBASE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWL.NS.Check WATERBASE.NS's competition here
AWL.NS vs CHATHA.BO Comparison May 2026
AWL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWL.NS stands at 258.4B. In comparison, CHATHA.BO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AWL.NS is priced at ₹194.63, while CHATHA.BO trades at ₹74.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.81, whereas CHATHA.BO's P/E ratio is 31.39. In terms of profitability, AWL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CHATHA.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AWL.NS is less volatile compared to CHATHA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWL.NS.Check CHATHA.BO's competition here
AWL.NS vs MKPL.BO Comparison May 2026
AWL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWL.NS stands at 258.4B. In comparison, MKPL.BO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AWL.NS is priced at ₹194.63, while MKPL.BO trades at ₹5.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.81, whereas MKPL.BO's P/E ratio is 23.36. In terms of profitability, AWL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MKPL.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AWL.NS is less volatile compared to MKPL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWL.NS.Check MKPL.BO's competition here
AWL.NS vs MKPL.NS Comparison May 2026
AWL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWL.NS stands at 258.4B. In comparison, MKPL.NS has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AWL.NS is priced at ₹194.63, while MKPL.NS trades at ₹5.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.81, whereas MKPL.NS's P/E ratio is 23.36. In terms of profitability, AWL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MKPL.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AWL.NS is less volatile compared to MKPL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWL.NS.Check MKPL.NS's competition here
AWL.NS vs UMANGDAIR.BO Comparison May 2026
AWL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWL.NS stands at 258.4B. In comparison, UMANGDAIR.BO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AWL.NS is priced at ₹194.63, while UMANGDAIR.BO trades at ₹76.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.81, whereas UMANGDAIR.BO's P/E ratio is 41.45. In terms of profitability, AWL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UMANGDAIR.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AWL.NS is less volatile compared to UMANGDAIR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWL.NS.Check UMANGDAIR.BO's competition here
AWL.NS vs DHUNTEAIND.BO Comparison May 2026
AWL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWL.NS stands at 258.4B. In comparison, DHUNTEAIND.BO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AWL.NS is priced at ₹194.63, while DHUNTEAIND.BO trades at ₹221.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.81, whereas DHUNTEAIND.BO's P/E ratio is 1.95. In terms of profitability, AWL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DHUNTEAIND.BO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AWL.NS is less volatile compared to DHUNTEAIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWL.NS.Check DHUNTEAIND.BO's competition here
AWL.NS vs DTIL.NS Comparison May 2026
AWL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWL.NS stands at 258.4B. In comparison, DTIL.NS has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AWL.NS is priced at ₹194.63, while DTIL.NS trades at ₹133.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.81, whereas DTIL.NS's P/E ratio is -10.49. In terms of profitability, AWL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DTIL.NS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AWL.NS is less volatile compared to DTIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWL.NS.Check DTIL.NS's competition here
AWL.NS vs DTIL.BO Comparison May 2026
AWL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWL.NS stands at 258.4B. In comparison, DTIL.BO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AWL.NS is priced at ₹194.63, while DTIL.BO trades at ₹130.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.81, whereas DTIL.BO's P/E ratio is -10.42. In terms of profitability, AWL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DTIL.BO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AWL.NS is more volatile compared to DTIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWL.NS.Check DTIL.BO's competition here
AWL.NS vs ROML.NS Comparison May 2026
AWL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWL.NS stands at 258.4B. In comparison, ROML.NS has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AWL.NS is priced at ₹194.63, while ROML.NS trades at ₹45.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.81, whereas ROML.NS's P/E ratio is 12.86. In terms of profitability, AWL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ROML.NS's ROE of -2.36%. Regarding short-term risk, AWL.NS is less volatile compared to ROML.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWL.NS.Check ROML.NS's competition here