Advance United Holdings Inc.
Advance United Holdings Inc. AUHI.CN Peers
See (AUHI.CN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Gold Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUHI.CN | CA$0.03 | -16.67% | 1.2M | -0.36 | -CA$0.07 | N/A |
| NGT.TO | CA$81.44 | +0.12% | 90.6B | 13.53 | CA$6.02 | +1.71% |
| AEM.TO | CA$163.36 | +0.13% | 82.6B | 25.37 | CA$6.44 | +1.37% |
| WPM.TO | CA$124.25 | +0.75% | 56.4B | 66.44 | CA$1.87 | +0.71% |
| ABX.TO | CA$29.18 | +0.14% | 50.2B | 16.13 | CA$1.81 | +2.44% |
| FNV.TO | CA$225.66 | +0.24% | 43.5B | 51.28 | CA$4.40 | +1.00% |
| K.TO | CA$21.54 | -0.05% | 26.4B | 16.08 | CA$1.34 | +0.77% |
| NCM.TO | CA$20.65 | +2.03% | 18.5B | 17.21 | CA$1.20 | N/A |
| LUG.TO | CA$72.45 | +0.82% | 17.5B | 23.83 | CA$3.04 | +3.62% |
| AGI.TO | CA$36.67 | -0.05% | 15.4B | 43.14 | CA$0.85 | +0.38% |
Stock Comparison
AUHI.CN vs NGT.TO Comparison
AUHI.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUHI.CN stands at 1.2M. In comparison, NGT.TO has a market cap of 90.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AUHI.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while NGT.TO trades at CA$81.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUHI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas NGT.TO's P/E ratio is 13.53. In terms of profitability, AUHI.CN's ROE is -1.66%, compared to NGT.TO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AUHI.CN is less volatile compared to NGT.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUHI.CN.
AUHI.CN vs AEM.TO Comparison
AUHI.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUHI.CN stands at 1.2M. In comparison, AEM.TO has a market cap of 82.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AUHI.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while AEM.TO trades at CA$163.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUHI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas AEM.TO's P/E ratio is 25.37. In terms of profitability, AUHI.CN's ROE is -1.66%, compared to AEM.TO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AUHI.CN is less volatile compared to AEM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUHI.CN.
AUHI.CN vs WPM.TO Comparison
AUHI.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUHI.CN stands at 1.2M. In comparison, WPM.TO has a market cap of 56.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AUHI.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while WPM.TO trades at CA$124.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUHI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas WPM.TO's P/E ratio is 66.44. In terms of profitability, AUHI.CN's ROE is -1.66%, compared to WPM.TO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AUHI.CN is less volatile compared to WPM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUHI.CN.
AUHI.CN vs ABX.TO Comparison
AUHI.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUHI.CN stands at 1.2M. In comparison, ABX.TO has a market cap of 50.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AUHI.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while ABX.TO trades at CA$29.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUHI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas ABX.TO's P/E ratio is 16.13. In terms of profitability, AUHI.CN's ROE is -1.66%, compared to ABX.TO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AUHI.CN is less volatile compared to ABX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUHI.CN.
AUHI.CN vs FNV.TO Comparison
AUHI.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUHI.CN stands at 1.2M. In comparison, FNV.TO has a market cap of 43.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AUHI.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while FNV.TO trades at CA$225.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUHI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas FNV.TO's P/E ratio is 51.28. In terms of profitability, AUHI.CN's ROE is -1.66%, compared to FNV.TO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AUHI.CN is less volatile compared to FNV.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUHI.CN.
AUHI.CN vs K.TO Comparison
AUHI.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUHI.CN stands at 1.2M. In comparison, K.TO has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AUHI.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while K.TO trades at CA$21.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUHI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas K.TO's P/E ratio is 16.08. In terms of profitability, AUHI.CN's ROE is -1.66%, compared to K.TO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AUHI.CN is less volatile compared to K.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUHI.CN.
AUHI.CN vs NCM.TO Comparison
AUHI.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUHI.CN stands at 1.2M. In comparison, NCM.TO has a market cap of 18.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AUHI.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while NCM.TO trades at CA$20.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUHI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas NCM.TO's P/E ratio is 17.21. In terms of profitability, AUHI.CN's ROE is -1.66%, compared to NCM.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AUHI.CN is less volatile compared to NCM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUHI.CN.
AUHI.CN vs LUG.TO Comparison
AUHI.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUHI.CN stands at 1.2M. In comparison, LUG.TO has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AUHI.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while LUG.TO trades at CA$72.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUHI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas LUG.TO's P/E ratio is 23.83. In terms of profitability, AUHI.CN's ROE is -1.66%, compared to LUG.TO's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, AUHI.CN is less volatile compared to LUG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUHI.CN.
AUHI.CN vs AGI.TO Comparison
AUHI.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUHI.CN stands at 1.2M. In comparison, AGI.TO has a market cap of 15.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AUHI.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while AGI.TO trades at CA$36.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUHI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas AGI.TO's P/E ratio is 43.14. In terms of profitability, AUHI.CN's ROE is -1.66%, compared to AGI.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AUHI.CN is less volatile compared to AGI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUHI.CN.
AUHI.CN vs EDV.TO Comparison
AUHI.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUHI.CN stands at 1.2M. In comparison, EDV.TO has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AUHI.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while EDV.TO trades at CA$42.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUHI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas EDV.TO's P/E ratio is -72.72. In terms of profitability, AUHI.CN's ROE is -1.66%, compared to EDV.TO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AUHI.CN is less volatile compared to EDV.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUHI.CN.
AUHI.CN vs YRI.TO Comparison
AUHI.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUHI.CN stands at 1.2M. In comparison, YRI.TO has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AUHI.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while YRI.TO trades at CA$7.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUHI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas YRI.TO's P/E ratio is -5.72. In terms of profitability, AUHI.CN's ROE is -1.66%, compared to YRI.TO's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, AUHI.CN is less volatile compared to YRI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUHI.CN.
AUHI.CN vs OR.TO Comparison
AUHI.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUHI.CN stands at 1.2M. In comparison, OR.TO has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AUHI.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while OR.TO trades at CA$35.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUHI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas OR.TO's P/E ratio is 153.83. In terms of profitability, AUHI.CN's ROE is -1.66%, compared to OR.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AUHI.CN is less volatile compared to OR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUHI.CN.
AUHI.CN vs BTO.TO Comparison
AUHI.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUHI.CN stands at 1.2M. In comparison, BTO.TO has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AUHI.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while BTO.TO trades at CA$4.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUHI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas BTO.TO's P/E ratio is -7.79. In terms of profitability, AUHI.CN's ROE is -1.66%, compared to BTO.TO's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AUHI.CN is less volatile compared to BTO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUHI.CN.
AUHI.CN vs EQX.TO Comparison
AUHI.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUHI.CN stands at 1.2M. In comparison, EQX.TO has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, AUHI.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while EQX.TO trades at CA$7.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUHI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas EQX.TO's P/E ratio is 8.14. In terms of profitability, AUHI.CN's ROE is -1.66%, compared to EQX.TO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AUHI.CN is less volatile compared to EQX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUHI.CN.
AUHI.CN vs IMG.TO Comparison
AUHI.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUHI.CN stands at 1.2M. In comparison, IMG.TO has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AUHI.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while IMG.TO trades at CA$10.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUHI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas IMG.TO's P/E ratio is 5.11. In terms of profitability, AUHI.CN's ROE is -1.66%, compared to IMG.TO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, AUHI.CN is less volatile compared to IMG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUHI.CN.
AUHI.CN vs ELD.TO Comparison
AUHI.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUHI.CN stands at 1.2M. In comparison, ELD.TO has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AUHI.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while ELD.TO trades at CA$28.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUHI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas ELD.TO's P/E ratio is 12.60. In terms of profitability, AUHI.CN's ROE is -1.66%, compared to ELD.TO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AUHI.CN is less volatile compared to ELD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUHI.CN.
AUHI.CN vs NGD.TO Comparison
AUHI.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUHI.CN stands at 1.2M. In comparison, NGD.TO has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AUHI.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while NGD.TO trades at CA$6.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUHI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas NGD.TO's P/E ratio is 26.92. In terms of profitability, AUHI.CN's ROE is -1.66%, compared to NGD.TO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AUHI.CN is less volatile compared to NGD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUHI.CN.
AUHI.CN vs OLA.TO Comparison
AUHI.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUHI.CN stands at 1.2M. In comparison, OLA.TO has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AUHI.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while OLA.TO trades at CA$13.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUHI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas OLA.TO's P/E ratio is 36.34. In terms of profitability, AUHI.CN's ROE is -1.66%, compared to OLA.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AUHI.CN is less volatile compared to OLA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUHI.CN.
AUHI.CN vs OGC.TO Comparison
AUHI.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUHI.CN stands at 1.2M. In comparison, OGC.TO has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AUHI.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while OGC.TO trades at CA$19.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUHI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas OGC.TO's P/E ratio is 11.59. In terms of profitability, AUHI.CN's ROE is -1.66%, compared to OGC.TO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AUHI.CN is less volatile compared to OGC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUHI.CN.
AUHI.CN vs PRU.TO Comparison
AUHI.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUHI.CN stands at 1.2M. In comparison, PRU.TO has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AUHI.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while PRU.TO trades at CA$3.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUHI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas PRU.TO's P/E ratio is 8.74. In terms of profitability, AUHI.CN's ROE is -1.66%, compared to PRU.TO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, AUHI.CN is less volatile compared to PRU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUHI.CN.
AUHI.CN vs SSL.TO Comparison
AUHI.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUHI.CN stands at 1.2M. In comparison, SSL.TO has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AUHI.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while SSL.TO trades at CA$13.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUHI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas SSL.TO's P/E ratio is 93.93. In terms of profitability, AUHI.CN's ROE is -1.66%, compared to SSL.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AUHI.CN is less volatile compared to SSL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUHI.CN.
AUHI.CN vs TXG.TO Comparison
AUHI.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUHI.CN stands at 1.2M. In comparison, TXG.TO has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AUHI.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while TXG.TO trades at CA$43.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUHI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas TXG.TO's P/E ratio is 21.36. In terms of profitability, AUHI.CN's ROE is -1.66%, compared to TXG.TO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AUHI.CN is less volatile compared to TXG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUHI.CN.
AUHI.CN vs SSRM.TO Comparison
AUHI.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUHI.CN stands at 1.2M. In comparison, SSRM.TO has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AUHI.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while SSRM.TO trades at CA$17.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUHI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas SSRM.TO's P/E ratio is 32.11. In terms of profitability, AUHI.CN's ROE is -1.66%, compared to SSRM.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AUHI.CN is less volatile compared to SSRM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUHI.CN.
AUHI.CN vs KNT.TO Comparison
AUHI.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUHI.CN stands at 1.2M. In comparison, KNT.TO has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AUHI.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while KNT.TO trades at CA$15.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUHI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas KNT.TO's P/E ratio is 14.79. In terms of profitability, AUHI.CN's ROE is -1.66%, compared to KNT.TO's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, AUHI.CN is less volatile compared to KNT.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUHI.CN.
AUHI.CN vs DPM.TO Comparison
AUHI.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUHI.CN stands at 1.2M. In comparison, DPM.TO has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AUHI.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while DPM.TO trades at CA$21.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUHI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas DPM.TO's P/E ratio is 11.97. In terms of profitability, AUHI.CN's ROE is -1.66%, compared to DPM.TO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AUHI.CN is less volatile compared to DPM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUHI.CN.
AUHI.CN vs CEE.TO Comparison
AUHI.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUHI.CN stands at 1.2M. In comparison, CEE.TO has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, AUHI.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while CEE.TO trades at CA$2.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUHI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas CEE.TO's P/E ratio is 24.80. In terms of profitability, AUHI.CN's ROE is -1.66%, compared to CEE.TO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AUHI.CN and CEE.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AUHI.CN vs WDO.TO Comparison
AUHI.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUHI.CN stands at 1.2M. In comparison, WDO.TO has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AUHI.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while WDO.TO trades at CA$18.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUHI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas WDO.TO's P/E ratio is 14.79. In terms of profitability, AUHI.CN's ROE is -1.66%, compared to WDO.TO's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, AUHI.CN is less volatile compared to WDO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUHI.CN.
AUHI.CN vs ORA.TO Comparison
AUHI.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUHI.CN stands at 1.2M. In comparison, ORA.TO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AUHI.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while ORA.TO trades at CA$35.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUHI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas ORA.TO's P/E ratio is -19.93. In terms of profitability, AUHI.CN's ROE is -1.66%, compared to ORA.TO's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, AUHI.CN is less volatile compared to ORA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUHI.CN.
AUHI.CN vs CXB.TO Comparison
AUHI.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUHI.CN stands at 1.2M. In comparison, CXB.TO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AUHI.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while CXB.TO trades at CA$2.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUHI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas CXB.TO's P/E ratio is 29.90. In terms of profitability, AUHI.CN's ROE is -1.66%, compared to CXB.TO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AUHI.CN is less volatile compared to CXB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUHI.CN.
AUHI.CN vs NG.TO Comparison
AUHI.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUHI.CN stands at 1.2M. In comparison, NG.TO has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AUHI.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while NG.TO trades at CA$6.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUHI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas NG.TO's P/E ratio is -17.22. In terms of profitability, AUHI.CN's ROE is -1.66%, compared to NG.TO's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AUHI.CN is less volatile compared to NG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUHI.CN.
AUHI.CN vs WGX.TO Comparison
AUHI.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUHI.CN stands at 1.2M. In comparison, WGX.TO has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AUHI.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while WGX.TO trades at CA$2.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUHI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas WGX.TO's P/E ratio is 36.29. In terms of profitability, AUHI.CN's ROE is -1.66%, compared to WGX.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AUHI.CN is less volatile compared to WGX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUHI.CN.
AUHI.CN vs AAUC.TO Comparison
AUHI.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUHI.CN stands at 1.2M. In comparison, AAUC.TO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AUHI.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while AAUC.TO trades at CA$19.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUHI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas AAUC.TO's P/E ratio is -12.64. In terms of profitability, AUHI.CN's ROE is -1.66%, compared to AAUC.TO's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, AUHI.CN is less volatile compared to AAUC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUHI.CN.
AUHI.CN vs CG.TO Comparison
AUHI.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUHI.CN stands at 1.2M. In comparison, CG.TO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AUHI.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while CG.TO trades at CA$10.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUHI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas CG.TO's P/E ratio is 41.24. In terms of profitability, AUHI.CN's ROE is -1.66%, compared to CG.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AUHI.CN is less volatile compared to CG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUHI.CN.
AUHI.CN vs SEA.TO Comparison
AUHI.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUHI.CN stands at 1.2M. In comparison, SEA.TO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AUHI.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while SEA.TO trades at CA$20.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUHI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas SEA.TO's P/E ratio is -137.53. In terms of profitability, AUHI.CN's ROE is -1.66%, compared to SEA.TO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AUHI.CN is less volatile compared to SEA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUHI.CN.
AUHI.CN vs OSK.TO Comparison
AUHI.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUHI.CN stands at 1.2M. In comparison, OSK.TO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AUHI.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while OSK.TO trades at CA$4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUHI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas OSK.TO's P/E ratio is -489.50. In terms of profitability, AUHI.CN's ROE is -1.66%, compared to OSK.TO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AUHI.CN is less volatile compared to OSK.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUHI.CN.
AUHI.CN vs CNL.TO Comparison
AUHI.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUHI.CN stands at 1.2M. In comparison, CNL.TO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AUHI.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while CNL.TO trades at CA$16.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUHI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas CNL.TO's P/E ratio is -24.88. In terms of profitability, AUHI.CN's ROE is -1.66%, compared to CNL.TO's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AUHI.CN is less volatile compared to CNL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUHI.CN.
AUHI.CN vs SBB.TO Comparison
AUHI.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUHI.CN stands at 1.2M. In comparison, SBB.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AUHI.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while SBB.TO trades at CA$2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUHI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas SBB.TO's P/E ratio is -72.00. In terms of profitability, AUHI.CN's ROE is -1.66%, compared to SBB.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AUHI.CN is less volatile compared to SBB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUHI.CN.
AUHI.CN vs KRR.TO Comparison
AUHI.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUHI.CN stands at 1.2M. In comparison, KRR.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AUHI.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while KRR.TO trades at CA$6.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUHI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas KRR.TO's P/E ratio is 83.75. In terms of profitability, AUHI.CN's ROE is -1.66%, compared to KRR.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AUHI.CN is less volatile compared to KRR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUHI.CN.
AUHI.CN vs RUP.TO Comparison
AUHI.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUHI.CN stands at 1.2M. In comparison, RUP.TO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AUHI.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while RUP.TO trades at CA$4.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUHI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas RUP.TO's P/E ratio is -159.00. In terms of profitability, AUHI.CN's ROE is -1.66%, compared to RUP.TO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AUHI.CN is less volatile compared to RUP.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUHI.CN.
AUHI.CN vs ASE.CN Comparison
AUHI.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUHI.CN stands at 1.2M. In comparison, ASE.CN has a market cap of 851.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AUHI.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while ASE.CN trades at CA$1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUHI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas ASE.CN's P/E ratio is -8.95. In terms of profitability, AUHI.CN's ROE is -1.66%, compared to ASE.CN's ROE of -30.89%. Regarding short-term risk, AUHI.CN and ASE.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AUHI.CN vs MSA.TO Comparison
AUHI.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUHI.CN stands at 1.2M. In comparison, MSA.TO has a market cap of 773.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AUHI.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while MSA.TO trades at CA$2.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUHI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas MSA.TO's P/E ratio is 5.27. In terms of profitability, AUHI.CN's ROE is -1.66%, compared to MSA.TO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AUHI.CN is less volatile compared to MSA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUHI.CN.
AUHI.CN vs IAU.TO Comparison
AUHI.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUHI.CN stands at 1.2M. In comparison, IAU.TO has a market cap of 711.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AUHI.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while IAU.TO trades at CA$0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUHI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas IAU.TO's P/E ratio is -1.73. In terms of profitability, AUHI.CN's ROE is -1.66%, compared to IAU.TO's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, AUHI.CN is less volatile compared to IAU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUHI.CN.
AUHI.CN vs GTWO.TO Comparison
AUHI.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUHI.CN stands at 1.2M. In comparison, GTWO.TO has a market cap of 689.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AUHI.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while GTWO.TO trades at CA$2.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUHI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas GTWO.TO's P/E ratio is -71.50. In terms of profitability, AUHI.CN's ROE is -1.66%, compared to GTWO.TO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AUHI.CN is less volatile compared to GTWO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUHI.CN.
AUHI.CN vs AR.TO Comparison
AUHI.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUHI.CN stands at 1.2M. In comparison, AR.TO has a market cap of 659.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AUHI.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while AR.TO trades at CA$0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUHI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas AR.TO's P/E ratio is -1.44. In terms of profitability, AUHI.CN's ROE is -1.66%, compared to AR.TO's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, AUHI.CN is less volatile compared to AR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUHI.CN.
AUHI.CN vs ORE.TO Comparison
AUHI.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUHI.CN stands at 1.2M. In comparison, ORE.TO has a market cap of 615.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AUHI.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while ORE.TO trades at CA$1.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUHI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas ORE.TO's P/E ratio is 6.44. In terms of profitability, AUHI.CN's ROE is -1.66%, compared to ORE.TO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, AUHI.CN is less volatile compared to ORE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUHI.CN.
AUHI.CN vs GAU.TO Comparison
AUHI.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUHI.CN stands at 1.2M. In comparison, GAU.TO has a market cap of 450.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AUHI.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while GAU.TO trades at CA$1.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUHI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas GAU.TO's P/E ratio is -17.50. In terms of profitability, AUHI.CN's ROE is -1.66%, compared to GAU.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AUHI.CN is less volatile compared to GAU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUHI.CN.
AUHI.CN vs PRB.TO Comparison
AUHI.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUHI.CN stands at 1.2M. In comparison, PRB.TO has a market cap of 446.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AUHI.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while PRB.TO trades at CA$2.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUHI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas PRB.TO's P/E ratio is -13.69. In terms of profitability, AUHI.CN's ROE is -1.66%, compared to PRB.TO's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AUHI.CN is less volatile compared to PRB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUHI.CN.
AUHI.CN vs MND.TO Comparison
AUHI.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUHI.CN stands at 1.2M. In comparison, MND.TO has a market cap of 436.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AUHI.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while MND.TO trades at CA$4.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUHI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas MND.TO's P/E ratio is 5.69. In terms of profitability, AUHI.CN's ROE is -1.66%, compared to MND.TO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AUHI.CN is less volatile compared to MND.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUHI.CN.
AUHI.CN vs SGD.CN Comparison
AUHI.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUHI.CN stands at 1.2M. In comparison, SGD.CN has a market cap of 416.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AUHI.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while SGD.CN trades at CA$3.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUHI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas SGD.CN's P/E ratio is -28.64. In terms of profitability, AUHI.CN's ROE is -1.66%, compared to SGD.CN's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, AUHI.CN and SGD.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AUHI.CN vs MOZ.TO Comparison
AUHI.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUHI.CN stands at 1.2M. In comparison, MOZ.TO has a market cap of 380M. Regarding current trading prices, AUHI.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while MOZ.TO trades at CA$0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUHI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas MOZ.TO's P/E ratio is -16.20. In terms of profitability, AUHI.CN's ROE is -1.66%, compared to MOZ.TO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AUHI.CN is less volatile compared to MOZ.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUHI.CN.
AUHI.CN vs FDR.V Comparison
AUHI.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUHI.CN stands at 1.2M. In comparison, FDR.V has a market cap of 354.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AUHI.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while FDR.V trades at CA$3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUHI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas FDR.V's P/E ratio is -30.00. In terms of profitability, AUHI.CN's ROE is -1.66%, compared to FDR.V's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AUHI.CN is less volatile compared to FDR.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUHI.CN.
AUHI.CN vs STGO.TO Comparison
AUHI.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUHI.CN stands at 1.2M. In comparison, STGO.TO has a market cap of 300.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AUHI.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while STGO.TO trades at CA$1.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUHI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas STGO.TO's P/E ratio is 4.58. In terms of profitability, AUHI.CN's ROE is -1.66%, compared to STGO.TO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AUHI.CN is less volatile compared to STGO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUHI.CN.
AUHI.CN vs JAG.TO Comparison
AUHI.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUHI.CN stands at 1.2M. In comparison, JAG.TO has a market cap of 295.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AUHI.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while JAG.TO trades at CA$3.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUHI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas JAG.TO's P/E ratio is -33.91. In terms of profitability, AUHI.CN's ROE is -1.66%, compared to JAG.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AUHI.CN is less volatile compared to JAG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUHI.CN.
AUHI.CN vs ITH.TO Comparison
AUHI.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUHI.CN stands at 1.2M. In comparison, ITH.TO has a market cap of 249.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AUHI.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while ITH.TO trades at CA$1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUHI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas ITH.TO's P/E ratio is -40.00. In terms of profitability, AUHI.CN's ROE is -1.66%, compared to ITH.TO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AUHI.CN is less volatile compared to ITH.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUHI.CN.
AUHI.CN vs SBI.TO Comparison
AUHI.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUHI.CN stands at 1.2M. In comparison, SBI.TO has a market cap of 240.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AUHI.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while SBI.TO trades at CA$3.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUHI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas SBI.TO's P/E ratio is 5.28. In terms of profitability, AUHI.CN's ROE is -1.66%, compared to SBI.TO's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, AUHI.CN is less volatile compared to SBI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUHI.CN.
AUHI.CN vs GOLD.TO Comparison
AUHI.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUHI.CN stands at 1.2M. In comparison, GOLD.TO has a market cap of 196M. Regarding current trading prices, AUHI.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while GOLD.TO trades at CA$1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUHI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas GOLD.TO's P/E ratio is -7.14. In terms of profitability, AUHI.CN's ROE is -1.66%, compared to GOLD.TO's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, AUHI.CN is less volatile compared to GOLD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUHI.CN.
AUHI.CN vs FF.TO Comparison
AUHI.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUHI.CN stands at 1.2M. In comparison, FF.TO has a market cap of 195M. Regarding current trading prices, AUHI.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while FF.TO trades at CA$0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUHI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas FF.TO's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, AUHI.CN's ROE is -1.66%, compared to FF.TO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AUHI.CN is less volatile compared to FF.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUHI.CN.
AUHI.CN vs DNG.TO Comparison
AUHI.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUHI.CN stands at 1.2M. In comparison, DNG.TO has a market cap of 193.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AUHI.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while DNG.TO trades at CA$4.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUHI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas DNG.TO's P/E ratio is 7.40. In terms of profitability, AUHI.CN's ROE is -1.66%, compared to DNG.TO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AUHI.CN is less volatile compared to DNG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUHI.CN.
AUHI.CN vs VGZ.TO Comparison
AUHI.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUHI.CN stands at 1.2M. In comparison, VGZ.TO has a market cap of 168.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AUHI.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while VGZ.TO trades at CA$1.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUHI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas VGZ.TO's P/E ratio is 12.27. In terms of profitability, AUHI.CN's ROE is -1.66%, compared to VGZ.TO's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, AUHI.CN is less volatile compared to VGZ.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUHI.CN.
AUHI.CN vs LGD.TO Comparison
AUHI.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUHI.CN stands at 1.2M. In comparison, LGD.TO has a market cap of 149.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AUHI.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while LGD.TO trades at CA$0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUHI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas LGD.TO's P/E ratio is -4.71. In terms of profitability, AUHI.CN's ROE is -1.66%, compared to LGD.TO's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, AUHI.CN is less volatile compared to LGD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUHI.CN.
AUHI.CN vs BSX.TO Comparison
AUHI.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUHI.CN stands at 1.2M. In comparison, BSX.TO has a market cap of 147M. Regarding current trading prices, AUHI.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while BSX.TO trades at CA$0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUHI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas BSX.TO's P/E ratio is -10.50. In terms of profitability, AUHI.CN's ROE is -1.66%, compared to BSX.TO's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, AUHI.CN is less volatile compared to BSX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUHI.CN.
AUHI.CN vs TNX.TO Comparison
AUHI.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUHI.CN stands at 1.2M. In comparison, TNX.TO has a market cap of 128.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AUHI.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while TNX.TO trades at CA$0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUHI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas TNX.TO's P/E ratio is 46.00. In terms of profitability, AUHI.CN's ROE is -1.66%, compared to TNX.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AUHI.CN is less volatile compared to TNX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUHI.CN.
AUHI.CN vs ELO.TO Comparison
AUHI.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUHI.CN stands at 1.2M. In comparison, ELO.TO has a market cap of 117.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AUHI.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while ELO.TO trades at CA$1.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUHI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas ELO.TO's P/E ratio is -24.80. In terms of profitability, AUHI.CN's ROE is -1.66%, compared to ELO.TO's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AUHI.CN is less volatile compared to ELO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUHI.CN.
AUHI.CN vs G.TO Comparison
AUHI.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUHI.CN stands at 1.2M. In comparison, G.TO has a market cap of 115.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AUHI.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while G.TO trades at CA$1.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUHI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas G.TO's P/E ratio is -13.40. In terms of profitability, AUHI.CN's ROE is -1.66%, compared to G.TO's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, AUHI.CN is less volatile compared to G.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUHI.CN.
AUHI.CN vs COG.TO Comparison
AUHI.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUHI.CN stands at 1.2M. In comparison, COG.TO has a market cap of 114.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AUHI.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while COG.TO trades at CA$0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUHI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas COG.TO's P/E ratio is -56.00. In terms of profitability, AUHI.CN's ROE is -1.66%, compared to COG.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AUHI.CN is less volatile compared to COG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUHI.CN.
AUHI.CN vs NEXG.V Comparison
AUHI.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUHI.CN stands at 1.2M. In comparison, NEXG.V has a market cap of 105.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AUHI.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while NEXG.V trades at CA$0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUHI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas NEXG.V's P/E ratio is -2.35. In terms of profitability, AUHI.CN's ROE is -1.66%, compared to NEXG.V's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AUHI.CN is less volatile compared to NEXG.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUHI.CN.
AUHI.CN vs STLR.TO Comparison
AUHI.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUHI.CN stands at 1.2M. In comparison, STLR.TO has a market cap of 105.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AUHI.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while STLR.TO trades at CA$0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUHI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas STLR.TO's P/E ratio is -3.40. In terms of profitability, AUHI.CN's ROE is -1.66%, compared to STLR.TO's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AUHI.CN is less volatile compared to STLR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUHI.CN.
AUHI.CN vs LN.TO Comparison
AUHI.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUHI.CN stands at 1.2M. In comparison, LN.TO has a market cap of 105.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AUHI.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while LN.TO trades at CA$0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUHI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas LN.TO's P/E ratio is -12.00. In terms of profitability, AUHI.CN's ROE is -1.66%, compared to LN.TO's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AUHI.CN is less volatile compared to LN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUHI.CN.
AUHI.CN vs SANU.CN Comparison
AUHI.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUHI.CN stands at 1.2M. In comparison, SANU.CN has a market cap of 104.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AUHI.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while SANU.CN trades at CA$0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUHI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas SANU.CN's P/E ratio is -24.50. In terms of profitability, AUHI.CN's ROE is -1.66%, compared to SANU.CN's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AUHI.CN is less volatile compared to SANU.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUHI.CN.
AUHI.CN vs MAW.TO Comparison
AUHI.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUHI.CN stands at 1.2M. In comparison, MAW.TO has a market cap of 102M. Regarding current trading prices, AUHI.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while MAW.TO trades at CA$0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUHI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas MAW.TO's P/E ratio is -17.25. In terms of profitability, AUHI.CN's ROE is -1.66%, compared to MAW.TO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AUHI.CN is less volatile compared to MAW.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUHI.CN.
AUHI.CN vs XTG.TO Comparison
AUHI.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUHI.CN stands at 1.2M. In comparison, XTG.TO has a market cap of 96.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AUHI.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while XTG.TO trades at CA$2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUHI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas XTG.TO's P/E ratio is 30.00. In terms of profitability, AUHI.CN's ROE is -1.66%, compared to XTG.TO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AUHI.CN is less volatile compared to XTG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUHI.CN.
AUHI.CN vs CBR.V Comparison
AUHI.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUHI.CN stands at 1.2M. In comparison, CBR.V has a market cap of 96.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AUHI.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while CBR.V trades at CA$0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUHI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas CBR.V's P/E ratio is -9.25. In terms of profitability, AUHI.CN's ROE is -1.66%, compared to CBR.V's ROE of -1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, AUHI.CN is less volatile compared to CBR.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUHI.CN.
AUHI.CN vs BLLG.CN Comparison
AUHI.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUHI.CN stands at 1.2M. In comparison, BLLG.CN has a market cap of 87M. Regarding current trading prices, AUHI.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while BLLG.CN trades at CA$0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUHI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas BLLG.CN's P/E ratio is -24.00. In terms of profitability, AUHI.CN's ROE is -1.66%, compared to BLLG.CN's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, AUHI.CN and BLLG.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AUHI.CN vs GHRT.V Comparison
AUHI.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUHI.CN stands at 1.2M. In comparison, GHRT.V has a market cap of 85.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AUHI.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while GHRT.V trades at CA$0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUHI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas GHRT.V's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AUHI.CN's ROE is -1.66%, compared to GHRT.V's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AUHI.CN is less volatile compared to GHRT.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUHI.CN.
AUHI.CN vs SIG.CN Comparison
AUHI.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUHI.CN stands at 1.2M. In comparison, SIG.CN has a market cap of 80M. Regarding current trading prices, AUHI.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while SIG.CN trades at CA$0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUHI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas SIG.CN's P/E ratio is -32.00. In terms of profitability, AUHI.CN's ROE is -1.66%, compared to SIG.CN's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AUHI.CN is less volatile compared to SIG.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUHI.CN.
AUHI.CN vs VEIN.V Comparison
AUHI.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUHI.CN stands at 1.2M. In comparison, VEIN.V has a market cap of 68.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AUHI.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while VEIN.V trades at CA$0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUHI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas VEIN.V's P/E ratio is -3.37. In terms of profitability, AUHI.CN's ROE is -1.66%, compared to VEIN.V's ROE of +1.47%. Regarding short-term risk, AUHI.CN and VEIN.V have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AUHI.CN vs CCM.TO Comparison
AUHI.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUHI.CN stands at 1.2M. In comparison, CCM.TO has a market cap of 68.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AUHI.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while CCM.TO trades at CA$0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUHI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas CCM.TO's P/E ratio is -37.00. In terms of profitability, AUHI.CN's ROE is -1.66%, compared to CCM.TO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AUHI.CN and CCM.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AUHI.CN vs TML.TO Comparison
AUHI.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUHI.CN stands at 1.2M. In comparison, TML.TO has a market cap of 64.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AUHI.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while TML.TO trades at CA$0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUHI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas TML.TO's P/E ratio is -3.14. In terms of profitability, AUHI.CN's ROE is -1.66%, compared to TML.TO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AUHI.CN and TML.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AUHI.CN vs HMR.V Comparison
AUHI.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUHI.CN stands at 1.2M. In comparison, HMR.V has a market cap of 64.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AUHI.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while HMR.V trades at CA$1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUHI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas HMR.V's P/E ratio is -14.71. In terms of profitability, AUHI.CN's ROE is -1.66%, compared to HMR.V's ROE of -5.38%. Regarding short-term risk, AUHI.CN is less volatile compared to HMR.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUHI.CN.
AUHI.CN vs ESM.TO Comparison
AUHI.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUHI.CN stands at 1.2M. In comparison, ESM.TO has a market cap of 57.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AUHI.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while ESM.TO trades at CA$0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUHI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas ESM.TO's P/E ratio is 14.50. In terms of profitability, AUHI.CN's ROE is -1.66%, compared to ESM.TO's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AUHI.CN is less volatile compared to ESM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUHI.CN.
AUHI.CN vs CGC.V Comparison
AUHI.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUHI.CN stands at 1.2M. In comparison, CGC.V has a market cap of 56.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AUHI.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while CGC.V trades at CA$0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUHI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas CGC.V's P/E ratio is -27.50. In terms of profitability, AUHI.CN's ROE is -1.66%, compared to CGC.V's ROE of +13.62%. Regarding short-term risk, AUHI.CN is less volatile compared to CGC.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUHI.CN.
AUHI.CN vs ME.TO Comparison
AUHI.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUHI.CN stands at 1.2M. In comparison, ME.TO has a market cap of 50.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AUHI.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while ME.TO trades at CA$0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUHI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas ME.TO's P/E ratio is -1.85. In terms of profitability, AUHI.CN's ROE is -1.66%, compared to ME.TO's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, AUHI.CN is less volatile compared to ME.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUHI.CN.
AUHI.CN vs USGD.CN Comparison
AUHI.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUHI.CN stands at 1.2M. In comparison, USGD.CN has a market cap of 49.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AUHI.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while USGD.CN trades at CA$0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUHI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas USGD.CN's P/E ratio is 22.50. In terms of profitability, AUHI.CN's ROE is -1.66%, compared to USGD.CN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AUHI.CN is less volatile compared to USGD.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUHI.CN.
AUHI.CN vs RISE.CN Comparison
AUHI.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUHI.CN stands at 1.2M. In comparison, RISE.CN has a market cap of 46M. Regarding current trading prices, AUHI.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while RISE.CN trades at CA$0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUHI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas RISE.CN's P/E ratio is -2.64. In terms of profitability, AUHI.CN's ROE is -1.66%, compared to RISE.CN's ROE of -1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, AUHI.CN is less volatile compared to RISE.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUHI.CN.
AUHI.CN vs NHK.TO Comparison
AUHI.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUHI.CN stands at 1.2M. In comparison, NHK.TO has a market cap of 39M. Regarding current trading prices, AUHI.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while NHK.TO trades at CA$0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUHI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas NHK.TO's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, AUHI.CN's ROE is -1.66%, compared to NHK.TO's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, AUHI.CN is less volatile compared to NHK.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUHI.CN.
AUHI.CN vs BNN.CN Comparison
AUHI.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUHI.CN stands at 1.2M. In comparison, BNN.CN has a market cap of 38M. Regarding current trading prices, AUHI.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while BNN.CN trades at CA$0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUHI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas BNN.CN's P/E ratio is -3.38. In terms of profitability, AUHI.CN's ROE is -1.66%, compared to BNN.CN's ROE of -1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, AUHI.CN is less volatile compared to BNN.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUHI.CN.
AUHI.CN vs VLC.V Comparison
AUHI.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUHI.CN stands at 1.2M. In comparison, VLC.V has a market cap of 37.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AUHI.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while VLC.V trades at CA$0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUHI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas VLC.V's P/E ratio is -19.00. In terms of profitability, AUHI.CN's ROE is -1.66%, compared to VLC.V's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AUHI.CN and VLC.V have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AUHI.CN vs NVO.TO Comparison
AUHI.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUHI.CN stands at 1.2M. In comparison, NVO.TO has a market cap of 35.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AUHI.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while NVO.TO trades at CA$0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUHI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas NVO.TO's P/E ratio is -0.77. In terms of profitability, AUHI.CN's ROE is -1.66%, compared to NVO.TO's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, AUHI.CN and NVO.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AUHI.CN vs NOM.CN Comparison
AUHI.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUHI.CN stands at 1.2M. In comparison, NOM.CN has a market cap of 34.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AUHI.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while NOM.CN trades at CA$0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUHI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas NOM.CN's P/E ratio is -12.37. In terms of profitability, AUHI.CN's ROE is -1.66%, compared to NOM.CN's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AUHI.CN is less volatile compared to NOM.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUHI.CN.
AUHI.CN vs AMM.TO Comparison
AUHI.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUHI.CN stands at 1.2M. In comparison, AMM.TO has a market cap of 32.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AUHI.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while AMM.TO trades at CA$0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUHI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas AMM.TO's P/E ratio is -12.00. In terms of profitability, AUHI.CN's ROE is -1.66%, compared to AMM.TO's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AUHI.CN and AMM.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AUHI.CN vs VGCX.TO Comparison
AUHI.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUHI.CN stands at 1.2M. In comparison, VGCX.TO has a market cap of 32.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AUHI.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while VGCX.TO trades at CA$0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUHI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas VGCX.TO's P/E ratio is 2.09. In terms of profitability, AUHI.CN's ROE is -1.66%, compared to VGCX.TO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AUHI.CN is less volatile compared to VGCX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUHI.CN.
AUHI.CN vs SGNL.TO Comparison
AUHI.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUHI.CN stands at 1.2M. In comparison, SGNL.TO has a market cap of 32.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AUHI.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while SGNL.TO trades at CA$0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUHI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas SGNL.TO's P/E ratio is -1.42. In terms of profitability, AUHI.CN's ROE is -1.66%, compared to SGNL.TO's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, AUHI.CN is less volatile compared to SGNL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUHI.CN.
AUHI.CN vs GTCH.CN Comparison
AUHI.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUHI.CN stands at 1.2M. In comparison, GTCH.CN has a market cap of 29.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AUHI.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while GTCH.CN trades at CA$0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUHI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas GTCH.CN's P/E ratio is -10.75. In terms of profitability, AUHI.CN's ROE is -1.66%, compared to GTCH.CN's ROE of +1.57%. Regarding short-term risk, AUHI.CN is less volatile compared to GTCH.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUHI.CN.
AUHI.CN vs VAU.V Comparison
AUHI.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUHI.CN stands at 1.2M. In comparison, VAU.V has a market cap of 26.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AUHI.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while VAU.V trades at CA$0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUHI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas VAU.V's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, AUHI.CN's ROE is -1.66%, compared to VAU.V's ROE of -1.86%. Regarding short-term risk, AUHI.CN is less volatile compared to VAU.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUHI.CN.
AUHI.CN vs IRV.CN Comparison
AUHI.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUHI.CN stands at 1.2M. In comparison, IRV.CN has a market cap of 26.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AUHI.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while IRV.CN trades at CA$0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUHI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas IRV.CN's P/E ratio is -17.00. In terms of profitability, AUHI.CN's ROE is -1.66%, compared to IRV.CN's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AUHI.CN is less volatile compared to IRV.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUHI.CN.
AUHI.CN vs AUOZ.CN Comparison
AUHI.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUHI.CN stands at 1.2M. In comparison, AUOZ.CN has a market cap of 25.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AUHI.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while AUOZ.CN trades at CA$0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUHI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas AUOZ.CN's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, AUHI.CN's ROE is -1.66%, compared to AUOZ.CN's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AUHI.CN is less volatile compared to AUOZ.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUHI.CN.
AUHI.CN vs GRC.TO Comparison
AUHI.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUHI.CN stands at 1.2M. In comparison, GRC.TO has a market cap of 24.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AUHI.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while GRC.TO trades at CA$0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUHI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas GRC.TO's P/E ratio is -8.50. In terms of profitability, AUHI.CN's ROE is -1.66%, compared to GRC.TO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AUHI.CN is less volatile compared to GRC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUHI.CN.
AUHI.CN vs WG.CN Comparison
AUHI.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUHI.CN stands at 1.2M. In comparison, WG.CN has a market cap of 22.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AUHI.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while WG.CN trades at CA$0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUHI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas WG.CN's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, AUHI.CN's ROE is -1.66%, compared to WG.CN's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AUHI.CN and WG.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AUHI.CN vs QIM.CN Comparison
AUHI.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUHI.CN stands at 1.2M. In comparison, QIM.CN has a market cap of 19.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AUHI.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while QIM.CN trades at CA$0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUHI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.36, whereas QIM.CN's P/E ratio is -3.82. In terms of profitability, AUHI.CN's ROE is -1.66%, compared to QIM.CN's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, AUHI.CN is less volatile compared to QIM.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUHI.CN.