Antares Pharma, Inc.
Antares Pharma, Inc. (ATRS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (ATRS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Medical - Instruments & Supplies Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ATRS | $5.59 | +0.18% | 0 | 14.95 | $0.37 | N/A |
| BDXA | $59.24 | -2.24% | 55.9B | 21.44 | $2.76 | +2.39% |
| BDX | $146.95 | +3.23% | 53.2B | 25.69 | $5.72 | +2.39% |
| ALC | $66.28 | +0.47% | 32.3B | 39.69 | $1.67 | +0.54% |
| MDLN | $37.70 | +4.66% | 31.9B | 33.07 | $1.14 | N/A |
| WST | $303.93 | -0.16% | 21.5B | 40.61 | $7.49 | +0.28% |
| HOLX | $76.01 | +0.00% | 17B | 31.54 | $2.41 | N/A |
| BDXB | $48.16 | +1.39% | 13.7B | 7.60 | $6.33 | +2.39% |
| COO | $61.45 | +0.84% | 12B | 30.57 | $2.01 | N/A |
| BAX | $18.33 | +3.04% | 9.5B | -9.60 | -$1.91 | +1.97% |
Stock Comparison
ATRS vs BDXA Comparison May 2026
ATRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRS stands at 0. In comparison, BDXA has a market cap of 55.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ATRS is priced at $5.59, while BDXA trades at $59.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.95, whereas BDXA's P/E ratio is 21.44. In terms of profitability, ATRS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to BDXA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRS is less volatile compared to BDXA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATRS.Check BDXA's competition here
ATRS vs BDX Comparison May 2026
ATRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRS stands at 0. In comparison, BDX has a market cap of 53.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ATRS is priced at $5.59, while BDX trades at $146.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.95, whereas BDX's P/E ratio is 25.69. In terms of profitability, ATRS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to BDX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRS is less volatile compared to BDX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATRS.Check BDX's competition here
ATRS vs ALC Comparison May 2026
ATRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRS stands at 0. In comparison, ALC has a market cap of 32.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ATRS is priced at $5.59, while ALC trades at $66.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.95, whereas ALC's P/E ratio is 39.69. In terms of profitability, ATRS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ALC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRS is less volatile compared to ALC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATRS.Check ALC's competition here
ATRS vs MDLN Comparison May 2026
ATRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRS stands at 0. In comparison, MDLN has a market cap of 31.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ATRS is priced at $5.59, while MDLN trades at $37.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.95, whereas MDLN's P/E ratio is 33.07. In terms of profitability, ATRS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to MDLN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRS is less volatile compared to MDLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATRS.Check MDLN's competition here
ATRS vs WST Comparison May 2026
ATRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRS stands at 0. In comparison, WST has a market cap of 21.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ATRS is priced at $5.59, while WST trades at $303.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.95, whereas WST's P/E ratio is 40.61. In terms of profitability, ATRS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to WST's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRS is less volatile compared to WST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATRS.Check WST's competition here
ATRS vs HOLX Comparison May 2026
ATRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRS stands at 0. In comparison, HOLX has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, ATRS is priced at $5.59, while HOLX trades at $76.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.95, whereas HOLX's P/E ratio is 31.54. In terms of profitability, ATRS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to HOLX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRS is more volatile compared to HOLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATRS.Check HOLX's competition here
ATRS vs BDXB Comparison May 2026
ATRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRS stands at 0. In comparison, BDXB has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ATRS is priced at $5.59, while BDXB trades at $48.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.95, whereas BDXB's P/E ratio is 7.60. In terms of profitability, ATRS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to BDXB's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRS is less volatile compared to BDXB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATRS.Check BDXB's competition here
ATRS vs COO Comparison May 2026
ATRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRS stands at 0. In comparison, COO has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, ATRS is priced at $5.59, while COO trades at $61.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.95, whereas COO's P/E ratio is 30.57. In terms of profitability, ATRS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to COO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRS is less volatile compared to COO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATRS.Check COO's competition here
ATRS vs BAX Comparison May 2026
ATRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRS stands at 0. In comparison, BAX has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ATRS is priced at $5.59, while BAX trades at $18.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.95, whereas BAX's P/E ratio is -9.60. In terms of profitability, ATRS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to BAX's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRS is less volatile compared to BAX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATRS.Check BAX's competition here
ATRS vs ATR Comparison May 2026
ATRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRS stands at 0. In comparison, ATR has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ATRS is priced at $5.59, while ATR trades at $113.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.95, whereas ATR's P/E ratio is 19.46. In terms of profitability, ATRS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ATR's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRS is less volatile compared to ATR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATRS.Check ATR's competition here
ATRS vs RGEN Comparison May 2026
ATRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRS stands at 0. In comparison, RGEN has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ATRS is priced at $5.59, while RGEN trades at $108.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.95, whereas RGEN's P/E ratio is 119.24. In terms of profitability, ATRS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to RGEN's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRS is less volatile compared to RGEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATRS.Check RGEN's competition here
ATRS vs TFX Comparison May 2026
ATRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRS stands at 0. In comparison, TFX has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ATRS is priced at $5.59, while TFX trades at $132.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.95, whereas TFX's P/E ratio is 2214.33. In terms of profitability, ATRS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to TFX's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRS is less volatile compared to TFX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATRS.Check TFX's competition here
ATRS vs BLCO Comparison May 2026
ATRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRS stands at 0. In comparison, BLCO has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ATRS is priced at $5.59, while BLCO trades at $16.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.95, whereas BLCO's P/E ratio is -26.11. In terms of profitability, ATRS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to BLCO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRS is less volatile compared to BLCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATRS.Check BLCO's competition here
ATRS vs AVTR Comparison May 2026
ATRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRS stands at 0. In comparison, AVTR has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ATRS is priced at $5.59, while AVTR trades at $7.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.95, whereas AVTR's P/E ratio is -9.43. In terms of profitability, ATRS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to AVTR's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRS is less volatile compared to AVTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATRS.Check AVTR's competition here
ATRS vs STVN Comparison May 2026
ATRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRS stands at 0. In comparison, STVN has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ATRS is priced at $5.59, while STVN trades at $17.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.95, whereas STVN's P/E ratio is 28.98. In terms of profitability, ATRS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to STVN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRS is less volatile compared to STVN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATRS.Check STVN's competition here
ATRS vs MMSI Comparison May 2026
ATRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRS stands at 0. In comparison, MMSI has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ATRS is priced at $5.59, while MMSI trades at $63.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.95, whereas MMSI's P/E ratio is 27.49. In terms of profitability, ATRS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to MMSI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRS is less volatile compared to MMSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATRS.Check MMSI's competition here
ATRS vs WRBY Comparison May 2026
ATRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRS stands at 0. In comparison, WRBY has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ATRS is priced at $5.59, while WRBY trades at $25.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.95, whereas WRBY's P/E ratio is 2549.00. In terms of profitability, ATRS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to WRBY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRS is less volatile compared to WRBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATRS.Check WRBY's competition here
ATRS vs ICUI Comparison May 2026
ATRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRS stands at 0. In comparison, ICUI has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ATRS is priced at $5.59, while ICUI trades at $123.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.95, whereas ICUI's P/E ratio is 66.48. In terms of profitability, ATRS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ICUI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRS is less volatile compared to ICUI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATRS.Check ICUI's competition here
ATRS vs HAE Comparison May 2026
ATRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRS stands at 0. In comparison, HAE has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ATRS is priced at $5.59, while HAE trades at $56.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.95, whereas HAE's P/E ratio is 15.67. In terms of profitability, ATRS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to HAE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRS is less volatile compared to HAE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATRS.Check HAE's competition here
ATRS vs LMAT Comparison May 2026
ATRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRS stands at 0. In comparison, LMAT has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ATRS is priced at $5.59, while LMAT trades at $101.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.95, whereas LMAT's P/E ratio is 37.25. In terms of profitability, ATRS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to LMAT's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRS is less volatile compared to LMAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATRS.Check LMAT's competition here
ATRS vs NVCR Comparison May 2026
ATRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRS stands at 0. In comparison, NVCR has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, ATRS is priced at $5.59, while NVCR trades at $17.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.95, whereas NVCR's P/E ratio is -11.12. In terms of profitability, ATRS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to NVCR's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRS is less volatile compared to NVCR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATRS.Check NVCR's competition here
ATRS vs XRAY Comparison May 2026
ATRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRS stands at 0. In comparison, XRAY has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, ATRS is priced at $5.59, while XRAY trades at $9.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.95, whereas XRAY's P/E ratio is -3.09. In terms of profitability, ATRS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to XRAY's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRS is less volatile compared to XRAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATRS.Check XRAY's competition here
ATRS vs PLSE Comparison May 2026
ATRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRS stands at 0. In comparison, PLSE has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ATRS is priced at $5.59, while PLSE trades at $24.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.95, whereas PLSE's P/E ratio is -22.68. In terms of profitability, ATRS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to PLSE's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRS is less volatile compared to PLSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATRS.Check PLSE's competition here
ATRS vs STAA Comparison May 2026
ATRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRS stands at 0. In comparison, STAA has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ATRS is priced at $5.59, while STAA trades at $32.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.95, whereas STAA's P/E ratio is -77.62. In terms of profitability, ATRS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to STAA's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRS is less volatile compared to STAA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATRS.Check STAA's competition here
ATRS vs ATRC Comparison May 2026
ATRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRS stands at 0. In comparison, ATRC has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ATRS is priced at $5.59, while ATRC trades at $28.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.95, whereas ATRC's P/E ratio is -288.00. In terms of profitability, ATRS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ATRC's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRS is less volatile compared to ATRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATRS.Check ATRC's competition here
ATRS vs NNNN Comparison May 2026
ATRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRS stands at 0. In comparison, NNNN has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ATRS is priced at $5.59, while NNNN trades at $32.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.95, whereas NNNN's P/E ratio is 215.60. In terms of profitability, ATRS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to NNNN's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRS is less volatile compared to NNNN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATRS.Check NNNN's competition here
ATRS vs KMTS Comparison May 2026
ATRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRS stands at 0. In comparison, KMTS has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ATRS is priced at $5.59, while KMTS trades at $19.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.95, whereas KMTS's P/E ratio is -3.63. In terms of profitability, ATRS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to KMTS's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRS is less volatile compared to KMTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATRS.Check KMTS's competition here
ATRS vs BLFS Comparison May 2026
ATRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRS stands at 0. In comparison, BLFS has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ATRS is priced at $5.59, while BLFS trades at $23.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.95, whereas BLFS's P/E ratio is -96.04. In terms of profitability, ATRS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to BLFS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRS is less volatile compared to BLFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATRS.Check BLFS's competition here
ATRS vs AZTA Comparison May 2026
ATRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRS stands at 0. In comparison, AZTA has a market cap of 813.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ATRS is priced at $5.59, while AZTA trades at $17.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.95, whereas AZTA's P/E ratio is -7.32. In terms of profitability, ATRS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to AZTA's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRS is less volatile compared to AZTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATRS.Check AZTA's competition here
ATRS vs ATRI Comparison May 2026
ATRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRS stands at 0. In comparison, ATRI has a market cap of 809.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ATRS is priced at $5.59, while ATRI trades at $459.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.95, whereas ATRI's P/E ratio is 64.50. In terms of profitability, ATRS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ATRI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRS is more volatile compared to ATRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATRS.Check ATRI's competition here
ATRS vs QDEL Comparison May 2026
ATRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRS stands at 0. In comparison, QDEL has a market cap of 776M. Regarding current trading prices, ATRS is priced at $5.59, while QDEL trades at $11.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.95, whereas QDEL's P/E ratio is -0.64. In terms of profitability, ATRS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to QDEL's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRS is less volatile compared to QDEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATRS.Check QDEL's competition here
ATRS vs ANGO Comparison May 2026
ATRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRS stands at 0. In comparison, ANGO has a market cap of 472.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ATRS is priced at $5.59, while ANGO trades at $11.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.95, whereas ANGO's P/E ratio is -15.05. In terms of profitability, ATRS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ANGO's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRS is less volatile compared to ANGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATRS.Check ANGO's competition here
ATRS vs OSUR Comparison May 2026
ATRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRS stands at 0. In comparison, OSUR has a market cap of 212.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ATRS is priced at $5.59, while OSUR trades at $3.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.95, whereas OSUR's P/E ratio is -2.93. In terms of profitability, ATRS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to OSUR's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRS is less volatile compared to OSUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATRS.Check OSUR's competition here
ATRS vs SMTI Comparison May 2026
ATRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRS stands at 0. In comparison, SMTI has a market cap of 208.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ATRS is priced at $5.59, while SMTI trades at $22.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.95, whereas SMTI's P/E ratio is 378.67. In terms of profitability, ATRS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to SMTI's ROE of -2.46%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRS is less volatile compared to SMTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATRS.Check SMTI's competition here
ATRS vs UTMD Comparison May 2026
ATRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRS stands at 0. In comparison, UTMD has a market cap of 203.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ATRS is priced at $5.59, while UTMD trades at $64.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.95, whereas UTMD's P/E ratio is 18.93. In terms of profitability, ATRS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to UTMD's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRS is less volatile compared to UTMD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATRS.Check UTMD's competition here
ATRS vs INFU Comparison May 2026
ATRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRS stands at 0. In comparison, INFU has a market cap of 195.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ATRS is priced at $5.59, while INFU trades at $9.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.95, whereas INFU's P/E ratio is 26.16. In terms of profitability, ATRS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to INFU's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRS is less volatile compared to INFU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATRS.Check INFU's competition here
ATRS vs PDEX Comparison May 2026
ATRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRS stands at 0. In comparison, PDEX has a market cap of 194.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ATRS is priced at $5.59, while PDEX trades at $60.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.95, whereas PDEX's P/E ratio is 16.74. In terms of profitability, ATRS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to PDEX's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRS is less volatile compared to PDEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATRS.Check PDEX's competition here
ATRS vs KRMD Comparison May 2026
ATRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRS stands at 0. In comparison, KRMD has a market cap of 181.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ATRS is priced at $5.59, while KRMD trades at $3.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.95, whereas KRMD's P/E ratio is -79.00. In terms of profitability, ATRS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to KRMD's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRS is less volatile compared to KRMD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATRS.Check KRMD's competition here
ATRS vs STXS Comparison May 2026
ATRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRS stands at 0. In comparison, STXS has a market cap of 168.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ATRS is priced at $5.59, while STXS trades at $1.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.95, whereas STXS's P/E ratio is -7.19. In terms of profitability, ATRS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to STXS's ROE of -1.53%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRS is less volatile compared to STXS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATRS.Check STXS's competition here
ATRS vs NYXH Comparison May 2026
ATRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRS stands at 0. In comparison, NYXH has a market cap of 104.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ATRS is priced at $5.59, while NYXH trades at $2.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.95, whereas NYXH's P/E ratio is -1.12. In terms of profitability, ATRS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to NYXH's ROE of -1.64%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRS is less volatile compared to NYXH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATRS.Check NYXH's competition here
ATRS vs MBOT Comparison May 2026
ATRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRS stands at 0. In comparison, MBOT has a market cap of 78.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ATRS is priced at $5.59, while MBOT trades at $1.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.95, whereas MBOT's P/E ratio is -6.65. In terms of profitability, ATRS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to MBOT's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRS is less volatile compared to MBOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATRS.Check MBOT's competition here
ATRS vs ZTEK Comparison May 2026
ATRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRS stands at 0. In comparison, ZTEK has a market cap of 78.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ATRS is priced at $5.59, while ZTEK trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.95, whereas ZTEK's P/E ratio is -12.14. In terms of profitability, ATRS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ZTEK's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRS is less volatile compared to ZTEK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATRS.Check ZTEK's competition here
ATRS vs AKYA Comparison May 2026
ATRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRS stands at 0. In comparison, AKYA has a market cap of 64.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ATRS is priced at $5.59, while AKYA trades at $1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.95, whereas AKYA's P/E ratio is -1.34. In terms of profitability, ATRS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to AKYA's ROE of -27.96%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRS is more volatile compared to AKYA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATRS.Check AKYA's competition here
ATRS vs DXR Comparison May 2026
ATRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRS stands at 0. In comparison, DXR has a market cap of 51.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ATRS is priced at $5.59, while DXR trades at $11.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.95, whereas DXR's P/E ratio is 6.20. In terms of profitability, ATRS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to DXR's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRS is less volatile compared to DXR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATRS.Check DXR's competition here
ATRS vs OMIC Comparison May 2026
ATRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRS stands at 0. In comparison, OMIC has a market cap of 50.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ATRS is priced at $5.59, while OMIC trades at $20.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.95, whereas OMIC's P/E ratio is -0.58. In terms of profitability, ATRS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to OMIC's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRS is more volatile compared to OMIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATRS.Check OMIC's competition here
ATRS vs IGAP Comparison May 2026
ATRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRS stands at 0. In comparison, IGAP has a market cap of 50.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ATRS is priced at $5.59, while IGAP trades at $3.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.95, whereas IGAP's P/E ratio is -10.52. In terms of profitability, ATRS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to IGAP's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRS is less volatile compared to IGAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATRS.Check IGAP's competition here
ATRS vs STSS Comparison May 2026
ATRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRS stands at 0. In comparison, STSS has a market cap of 45.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ATRS is priced at $5.59, while STSS trades at $1.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.95, whereas STSS's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, ATRS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to STSS's ROE of -1.66%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRS is less volatile compared to STSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATRS.Check STSS's competition here
ATRS vs NEPH Comparison May 2026
ATRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRS stands at 0. In comparison, NEPH has a market cap of 39.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ATRS is priced at $5.59, while NEPH trades at $3.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.95, whereas NEPH's P/E ratio is 51.71. In terms of profitability, ATRS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to NEPH's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRS is less volatile compared to NEPH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATRS.Check NEPH's competition here
ATRS vs POCI Comparison May 2026
ATRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRS stands at 0. In comparison, POCI has a market cap of 38.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ATRS is priced at $5.59, while POCI trades at $5.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.95, whereas POCI's P/E ratio is -7.84. In terms of profitability, ATRS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to POCI's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRS is less volatile compared to POCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATRS.Check POCI's competition here
ATRS vs MLSS Comparison May 2026
ATRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRS stands at 0. In comparison, MLSS has a market cap of 30.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ATRS is priced at $5.59, while MLSS trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.95, whereas MLSS's P/E ratio is -5.75. In terms of profitability, ATRS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to MLSS's ROE of -1.66%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRS is less volatile compared to MLSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATRS.Check MLSS's competition here
ATRS vs SDC Comparison May 2026
ATRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRS stands at 0. In comparison, SDC has a market cap of 29.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ATRS is priced at $5.59, while SDC trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.95, whereas SDC's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, ATRS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to SDC's ROE of -1.96%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRS is less volatile compared to SDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATRS.Check SDC's competition here
ATRS vs EKSO Comparison May 2026
ATRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRS stands at 0. In comparison, EKSO has a market cap of 28.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ATRS is priced at $5.59, while EKSO trades at $11.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.95, whereas EKSO's P/E ratio is -2.31. In terms of profitability, ATRS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to EKSO's ROE of -1.77%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRS is less volatile compared to EKSO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATRS.Check EKSO's competition here
ATRS vs IVC Comparison May 2026
ATRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRS stands at 0. In comparison, IVC has a market cap of 24.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ATRS is priced at $5.59, while IVC trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.95, whereas IVC's P/E ratio is -0.79. In terms of profitability, ATRS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to IVC's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRS is less volatile compared to IVC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATRS.Check IVC's competition here
ATRS vs HBIO Comparison May 2026
ATRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRS stands at 0. In comparison, HBIO has a market cap of 22.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ATRS is priced at $5.59, while HBIO trades at $5.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.95, whereas HBIO's P/E ratio is -2.33. In terms of profitability, ATRS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to HBIO's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRS is less volatile compared to HBIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATRS.Check HBIO's competition here
ATRS vs RVP Comparison May 2026
ATRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRS stands at 0. In comparison, RVP has a market cap of 19.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ATRS is priced at $5.59, while RVP trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.95, whereas RVP's P/E ratio is -1.54. In terms of profitability, ATRS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to RVP's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRS is less volatile compared to RVP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATRS.Check RVP's competition here
ATRS vs ZJYL Comparison May 2026
ATRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRS stands at 0. In comparison, ZJYL has a market cap of 17.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ATRS is priced at $5.59, while ZJYL trades at $2.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.95, whereas ZJYL's P/E ratio is 11.40. In terms of profitability, ATRS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ZJYL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRS is less volatile compared to ZJYL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATRS.Check ZJYL's competition here
ATRS vs FEMY Comparison May 2026
ATRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRS stands at 0. In comparison, FEMY has a market cap of 10.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ATRS is priced at $5.59, while FEMY trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.95, whereas FEMY's P/E ratio is -1.49. In terms of profitability, ATRS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to FEMY's ROE of -2.58%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRS is less volatile compared to FEMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATRS.Check FEMY's competition here
ATRS vs RGNT Comparison May 2026
ATRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRS stands at 0. In comparison, RGNT has a market cap of 7.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ATRS is priced at $5.59, while RGNT trades at $1.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.95, whereas RGNT's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, ATRS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to RGNT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ATRS is less volatile compared to RGNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATRS.Check RGNT's competition here
ATRS vs NXGL Comparison May 2026
ATRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRS stands at 0. In comparison, NXGL has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ATRS is priced at $5.59, while NXGL trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.95, whereas NXGL's P/E ratio is -1.53. In terms of profitability, ATRS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to NXGL's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRS is less volatile compared to NXGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATRS.Check NXGL's competition here
ATRS vs NSTG Comparison May 2026
ATRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRS stands at 0. In comparison, NSTG has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ATRS is priced at $5.59, while NSTG trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.95, whereas NSTG's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, ATRS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to NSTG's ROE of -1.43%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRS is less volatile compared to NSTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATRS.Check NSTG's competition here
ATRS vs NXGLW Comparison May 2026
ATRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRS stands at 0. In comparison, NXGLW has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ATRS is priced at $5.59, while NXGLW trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.95, whereas NXGLW's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, ATRS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to NXGLW's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRS is less volatile compared to NXGLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATRS.Check NXGLW's competition here
ATRS vs LUCY Comparison May 2026
ATRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRS stands at 0. In comparison, LUCY has a market cap of 3.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ATRS is priced at $5.59, while LUCY trades at $0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.95, whereas LUCY's P/E ratio is -0.49. In terms of profitability, ATRS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to LUCY's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRS is less volatile compared to LUCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATRS.Check LUCY's competition here
ATRS vs POAI Comparison May 2026
ATRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRS stands at 0. In comparison, POAI has a market cap of 3.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ATRS is priced at $5.59, while POAI trades at $4.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.95, whereas POAI's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, ATRS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to POAI's ROE of -107.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRS is less volatile compared to POAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATRS.Check POAI's competition here
ATRS vs MHUA Comparison May 2026
ATRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRS stands at 0. In comparison, MHUA has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ATRS is priced at $5.59, while MHUA trades at $7.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.95, whereas MHUA's P/E ratio is 0.25. In terms of profitability, ATRS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to MHUA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRS is more volatile compared to MHUA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATRS.Check MHUA's competition here
ATRS vs GMVD Comparison May 2026
ATRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRS stands at 0. In comparison, GMVD has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ATRS is priced at $5.59, while GMVD trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.95, whereas GMVD's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ATRS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to GMVD's ROE of +2.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRS is less volatile compared to GMVD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATRS.Check GMVD's competition here
ATRS vs GMVDW Comparison May 2026
ATRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRS stands at 0. In comparison, GMVDW has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ATRS is priced at $5.59, while GMVDW trades at $7.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.95, whereas GMVDW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ATRS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to GMVDW's ROE of +2.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRS is less volatile compared to GMVDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATRS.Check GMVDW's competition here
ATRS vs AVGR Comparison May 2026
ATRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRS stands at 0. In comparison, AVGR has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ATRS is priced at $5.59, while AVGR trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.95, whereas AVGR's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, ATRS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to AVGR's ROE of +17.82%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRS is less volatile compared to AVGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATRS.Check AVGR's competition here
ATRS vs STSSW Comparison May 2026
ATRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRS stands at 0. In comparison, STSSW has a market cap of 990K. Regarding current trading prices, ATRS is priced at $5.59, while STSSW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.95, whereas STSSW's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, ATRS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to STSSW's ROE of -1.66%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRS is less volatile compared to STSSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATRS.Check STSSW's competition here
ATRS vs GCTK Comparison May 2026
ATRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRS stands at 0. In comparison, GCTK has a market cap of 314.8K. Regarding current trading prices, ATRS is priced at $5.59, while GCTK trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.95, whereas GCTK's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, ATRS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to GCTK's ROE of -2.83%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRS is less volatile compared to GCTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATRS.Check GCTK's competition here
ATRS vs LUCYW Comparison May 2026
ATRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRS stands at 0. In comparison, LUCYW has a market cap of 296.1K. Regarding current trading prices, ATRS is priced at $5.59, while LUCYW trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.95, whereas LUCYW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ATRS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to LUCYW's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRS is less volatile compared to LUCYW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATRS.Check LUCYW's competition here
ATRS vs WOK Comparison May 2026
ATRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRS stands at 0. In comparison, WOK has a market cap of 1.3K. Regarding current trading prices, ATRS is priced at $5.59, while WOK trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.95, whereas WOK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ATRS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to WOK's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRS is less volatile compared to WOK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATRS.Check WOK's competition here
ATRS vs ALOG Comparison May 2026
ATRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRS stands at 0. In comparison, ALOG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ATRS is priced at $5.59, while ALOG trades at $83.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.95, whereas ALOG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ATRS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ALOG's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRS is more volatile compared to ALOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATRS.Check ALOG's competition here
ATRS vs ARTC Comparison May 2026
ATRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRS stands at 0. In comparison, ARTC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ATRS is priced at $5.59, while ARTC trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.95, whereas ARTC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ATRS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ARTC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ATRS is more volatile compared to ARTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATRS.Check ARTC's competition here
ATRS vs IIN Comparison May 2026
ATRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRS stands at 0. In comparison, IIN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ATRS is priced at $5.59, while IIN trades at $24.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.95, whereas IIN's P/E ratio is 226.45. In terms of profitability, ATRS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to IIN's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRS is more volatile compared to IIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATRS.Check IIN's competition here
ATRS vs IVTY Comparison May 2026
ATRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRS stands at 0. In comparison, IVTY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ATRS is priced at $5.59, while IVTY trades at $7.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.95, whereas IVTY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ATRS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to IVTY's ROE of -2.40%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRS is more volatile compared to IVTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATRS.Check IVTY's competition here
ATRS vs APR Comparison May 2026
ATRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRS stands at 0. In comparison, APR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ATRS is priced at $5.59, while APR trades at $37.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.95, whereas APR's P/E ratio is 22.59. In terms of profitability, ATRS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to APR's ROE of +9.81%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRS is more volatile compared to APR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATRS.Check APR's competition here
ATRS vs HRC Comparison May 2026
ATRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRS stands at 0. In comparison, HRC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ATRS is priced at $5.59, while HRC trades at $155.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.95, whereas HRC's P/E ratio is 41.92. In terms of profitability, ATRS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to HRC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRS is more volatile compared to HRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATRS.Check HRC's competition here