Athene Holding Ltd.

ATH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATH stands at 19.79B. In comparison, ALIZY has a market cap of 1.63T. Regarding current trading prices, ATH is priced at $83.33, while ALIZY trades at $42.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.42, whereas ALIZY's P/E ratio is 14.78. In terms of profitability, ATH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ALIZY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH is more volatile compared to ALIZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.

ATH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATH stands at 19.79B. In comparison, BRK-A has a market cap of 1.11T. Regarding current trading prices, ATH is priced at $83.33, while BRK-A trades at $770,360.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.42, whereas BRK-A's P/E ratio is 13.69. In terms of profitability, ATH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BRK-A's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH is more volatile compared to BRK-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.

ATH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATH stands at 19.79B. In comparison, BRK-B has a market cap of 1.11T. Regarding current trading prices, ATH is priced at $83.33, while BRK-B trades at $513.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.42, whereas BRK-B's P/E ratio is 13.69. In terms of profitability, ATH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BRK-B's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH is more volatile compared to BRK-B. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.

ATH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATH stands at 19.79B. In comparison, ALIZF has a market cap of 164.02B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH is priced at $83.33, while ALIZF trades at $425.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.42, whereas ALIZF's P/E ratio is 14.92. In terms of profitability, ATH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ALIZF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH is less volatile compared to ALIZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.

ATH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATH stands at 19.79B. In comparison, AIG-PA has a market cap of 112.45B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH is priced at $83.33, while AIG-PA trades at $62.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.42, whereas AIG-PA's P/E ratio is 5.48. In terms of profitability, ATH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AIG-PA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH is less volatile compared to AIG-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.

ATH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATH stands at 19.79B. In comparison, AXAHY has a market cap of 102.94B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH is priced at $83.33, while AXAHY trades at $47.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.42, whereas AXAHY's P/E ratio is 12.84. In terms of profitability, ATH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AXAHY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH is more volatile compared to AXAHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.

ATH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATH stands at 19.79B. In comparison, AXAHF has a market cap of 101.98B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH is priced at $83.33, while AXAHF trades at $46.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.42, whereas AXAHF's P/E ratio is 12.77. In terms of profitability, ATH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AXAHF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH is more volatile compared to AXAHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.

ATH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATH stands at 19.79B. In comparison, ZFSVF has a market cap of 100.09B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH is priced at $83.33, while ZFSVF trades at $703.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.42, whereas ZFSVF's P/E ratio is 17.52. In terms of profitability, ATH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ZFSVF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH is less volatile compared to ZFSVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.

ATH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATH stands at 19.79B. In comparison, ZURVY has a market cap of 99.77B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH is priced at $83.33, while ZURVY trades at $35.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.42, whereas ZURVY's P/E ratio is 17.44. In terms of profitability, ATH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ZURVY's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH is more volatile compared to ZURVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.

ATH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATH stands at 19.79B. In comparison, ARZGY has a market cap of 59.55B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH is priced at $83.33, while ARZGY trades at $19.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.42, whereas ARZGY's P/E ratio is 13.94. In terms of profitability, ATH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ARZGY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH is more volatile compared to ARZGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.

ATH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATH stands at 19.79B. In comparison, ARZGF has a market cap of 52.57B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH is priced at $83.33, while ARZGF trades at $35.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.42, whereas ARZGF's P/E ratio is 12.54. In terms of profitability, ATH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ARZGF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH is more volatile compared to ARZGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.

ATH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATH stands at 19.79B. In comparison, AEH has a market cap of 52.47B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH is priced at $83.33, while AEH trades at $25.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.42, whereas AEH's P/E ratio is 19.37. In terms of profitability, ATH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AEH's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ATH is more volatile compared to AEH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.

ATH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATH stands at 19.79B. In comparison, AED has a market cap of 52.17B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH is priced at $83.33, while AED trades at $25.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.42, whereas AED's P/E ratio is 19.26. In terms of profitability, ATH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AED's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ATH is more volatile compared to AED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.

ATH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATH stands at 19.79B. In comparison, AEB has a market cap of 51.13B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH is priced at $83.33, while AEB trades at $25.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.42, whereas AEB's P/E ratio is 18.88. In terms of profitability, ATH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AEB's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ATH is more volatile compared to AEB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.

ATH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATH stands at 19.79B. In comparison, AIG has a market cap of 47.48B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH is priced at $83.33, while AIG trades at $82.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.42, whereas AIG's P/E ratio is 20.10. In terms of profitability, ATH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AIG's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH is more volatile compared to AIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.

ATH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATH stands at 19.79B. In comparison, HIG-PG has a market cap of 36.33B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH is priced at $83.33, while HIG-PG trades at $24.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.42, whereas HIG-PG's P/E ratio is 3.41. In terms of profitability, ATH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to HIG-PG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH is more volatile compared to HIG-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.

ATH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATH stands at 19.79B. In comparison, HIG has a market cap of 36.23B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH is priced at $83.33, while HIG trades at $127.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.42, whereas HIG's P/E ratio is 12.71. In terms of profitability, ATH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to HIG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH is more volatile compared to HIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.

ATH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATH stands at 19.79B. In comparison, ACGL has a market cap of 35.42B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH is priced at $83.33, while ACGL trades at $94.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.42, whereas ACGL's P/E ratio is 9.69. In terms of profitability, ATH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ACGL's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH is more volatile compared to ACGL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.

ATH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATH stands at 19.79B. In comparison, ACGLO has a market cap of 35.40B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH is priced at $83.33, while ACGLO trades at $20.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.42, whereas ACGLO's P/E ratio is 4.37. In terms of profitability, ATH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ACGLO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH is more volatile compared to ACGLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.

ATH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATH stands at 19.79B. In comparison, SUNFF has a market cap of 33.62B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH is priced at $83.33, while SUNFF trades at $11.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.42, whereas SUNFF's P/E ratio is 2.29. In terms of profitability, ATH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SUNFF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH is more volatile compared to SUNFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.

ATH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATH stands at 19.79B. In comparison, SLF has a market cap of 32.36B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH is priced at $83.33, while SLF trades at $56.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.42, whereas SLF's P/E ratio is 14.91. In terms of profitability, ATH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SLF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH is more volatile compared to SLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.

ATH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATH stands at 19.79B. In comparison, SZLMY has a market cap of 28.75B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH is priced at $83.33, while SZLMY trades at $50.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.42, whereas SZLMY's P/E ratio is 19.60. In terms of profitability, ATH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SZLMY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH is less volatile compared to SZLMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.

ATH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATH stands at 19.79B. In comparison, SAXPY has a market cap of 28.16B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH is priced at $83.33, while SAXPY trades at $20.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.42, whereas SAXPY's P/E ratio is 22.04. In terms of profitability, ATH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SAXPY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH is more volatile compared to SAXPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.

ATH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATH stands at 19.79B. In comparison, SWSDF has a market cap of 27.78B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH is priced at $83.33, while SWSDF trades at $973.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.42, whereas SWSDF's P/E ratio is 18.95. In terms of profitability, ATH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SWSDF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH is less volatile compared to SWSDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.

ATH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATH stands at 19.79B. In comparison, SAXPF has a market cap of 26.90B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH is priced at $83.33, while SAXPF trades at $10.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.42, whereas SAXPF's P/E ratio is 20.83. In terms of profitability, ATH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SAXPF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH is less volatile compared to SAXPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.

ATH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATH stands at 19.79B. In comparison, TNXXF has a market cap of 21.89B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH is priced at $83.33, while TNXXF trades at $84.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.42, whereas TNXXF's P/E ratio is 11.23. In terms of profitability, ATH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TNXXF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH is less volatile compared to TNXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.

ATH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATH stands at 19.79B. In comparison, AVVIY has a market cap of 20.87B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH is priced at $83.33, while AVVIY trades at $15.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.42, whereas AVVIY's P/E ratio is 25.31. In terms of profitability, ATH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AVVIY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH is more volatile compared to AVVIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.

ATH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATH stands at 19.79B. In comparison, TLLXY has a market cap of 20.69B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH is priced at $83.33, while TLLXY trades at $40.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.42, whereas TLLXY's P/E ratio is 9.23. In terms of profitability, ATH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TLLXY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH is less volatile compared to TLLXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.

ATH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATH stands at 19.79B. In comparison, AIVAF has a market cap of 20.53B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH is priced at $83.33, while AIVAF trades at $7.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.42, whereas AIVAF's P/E ratio is 24.90. In terms of profitability, ATH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AIVAF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH is less volatile compared to AIVAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.

ATH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATH stands at 19.79B. In comparison, PFG has a market cap of 17.69B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH is priced at $83.33, while PFG trades at $78.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.42, whereas PFG's P/E ratio is 16.90. In terms of profitability, ATH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PFG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH is more volatile compared to PFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.

ATH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATH stands at 19.79B. In comparison, NNGPF has a market cap of 16.76B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH is priced at $83.33, while NNGPF trades at $62.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.42, whereas NNGPF's P/E ratio is 9.93. In terms of profitability, ATH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NNGPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH is more volatile compared to NNGPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.

ATH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATH stands at 19.79B. In comparison, NNGRY has a market cap of 16.54B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH is priced at $83.33, while NNGRY trades at $30.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.42, whereas NNGRY's P/E ratio is 9.79. In terms of profitability, ATH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NNGRY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH is more volatile compared to NNGRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.

ATH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATH stands at 19.79B. In comparison, EQH has a market cap of 15.60B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH is priced at $83.33, while EQH trades at $51.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.42, whereas EQH's P/E ratio is 13.84. In terms of profitability, ATH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to EQH's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH is more volatile compared to EQH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.

ATH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATH stands at 19.79B. In comparison, ACGLP has a market cap of 15.17B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH is priced at $83.33, while ACGLP trades at $24.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.42, whereas ACGLP's P/E ratio is 5.03. In terms of profitability, ATH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ACGLP's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH is more volatile compared to ACGLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.

ATH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATH stands at 19.79B. In comparison, UNMA has a market cap of 13.95B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH is priced at $83.33, while UNMA trades at $24.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.42, whereas UNMA's P/E ratio is 5.04. In terms of profitability, ATH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to UNMA's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH is more volatile compared to UNMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.

ATH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATH stands at 19.79B. In comparison, BNT has a market cap of 13.88B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH is priced at $83.33, while BNT trades at $56.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.42, whereas BNT's P/E ratio is 6.53. In terms of profitability, ATH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BNT's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH is more volatile compared to BNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.

ATH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATH stands at 19.79B. In comparison, UFGSY has a market cap of 13.62B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH is priced at $83.33, while UFGSY trades at $9.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.42, whereas UFGSY's P/E ratio is 11.19. In terms of profitability, ATH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to UFGSY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH is more volatile compared to UFGSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.

ATH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATH stands at 19.79B. In comparison, TGVSF has a market cap of 13.50B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH is priced at $83.33, while TGVSF trades at $22.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.42, whereas TGVSF's P/E ratio is 20.75. In terms of profitability, ATH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TGVSF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH is less volatile compared to TGVSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.

ATH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATH stands at 19.79B. In comparison, BBSEY has a market cap of 13.26B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH is priced at $83.33, while BBSEY trades at $6.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.42, whereas BBSEY's P/E ratio is 8.76. In terms of profitability, ATH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BBSEY's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH is more volatile compared to BBSEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.

ATH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATH stands at 19.79B. In comparison, AGESF has a market cap of 12.21B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH is priced at $83.33, while AGESF trades at $63.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.42, whereas AGESF's P/E ratio is 9.18. In terms of profitability, ATH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AGESF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH is more volatile compared to AGESF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.

ATH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATH stands at 19.79B. In comparison, GJNSY has a market cap of 12.20B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH is priced at $83.33, while GJNSY trades at $24.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.42, whereas GJNSY's P/E ratio is 23.02. In terms of profitability, ATH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GJNSY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH is less volatile compared to GJNSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.

ATH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATH stands at 19.79B. In comparison, AGESY has a market cap of 12.20B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH is priced at $83.33, while AGESY trades at $63.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.42, whereas AGESY's P/E ratio is 9.24. In terms of profitability, ATH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AGESY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH is less volatile compared to AGESY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.

ATH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATH stands at 19.79B. In comparison, MPFRF has a market cap of 11.53B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH is priced at $83.33, while MPFRF trades at $3.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.42, whereas MPFRF's P/E ratio is 10.44. In terms of profitability, ATH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MPFRF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH is more volatile compared to MPFRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.

ATH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATH stands at 19.79B. In comparison, AEG has a market cap of 10.63B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH is priced at $83.33, while AEG trades at $6.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.42, whereas AEG's P/E ratio is 15.98. In terms of profitability, ATH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AEG's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH is more volatile compared to AEG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.

ATH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATH stands at 19.79B. In comparison, AEGOF has a market cap of 10.62B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH is priced at $83.33, while AEGOF trades at $6.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.42, whereas AEGOF's P/E ratio is 15.97. In terms of profitability, ATH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AEGOF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH is more volatile compared to AEGOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.

ATH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATH stands at 19.79B. In comparison, BLHEY has a market cap of 10.51B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH is priced at $83.33, while BLHEY trades at $23.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.42, whereas BLHEY's P/E ratio is 22.44. In terms of profitability, ATH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BLHEY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH is more volatile compared to BLHEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.

ATH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATH stands at 19.79B. In comparison, BLHEF has a market cap of 10.37B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH is priced at $83.33, while BLHEF trades at $227.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.42, whereas BLHEF's P/E ratio is 22.13. In terms of profitability, ATH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BLHEF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH is less volatile compared to BLHEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.

ATH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATH stands at 19.79B. In comparison, AIZN has a market cap of 9.98B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH is priced at $83.33, while AIZN trades at $19.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.42, whereas AIZN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ATH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AIZN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH is more volatile compared to AIZN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.

ATH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATH stands at 19.79B. In comparison, ORI has a market cap of 9.37B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH is priced at $83.33, while ORI trades at $37.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.42, whereas ORI's P/E ratio is 12.35. In terms of profitability, ATH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ORI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH is more volatile compared to ORI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.

ATH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATH stands at 19.79B. In comparison, IAFNF has a market cap of 8.96B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH is priced at $83.33, while IAFNF trades at $96.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.42, whereas IAFNF's P/E ratio is 13.62. In terms of profitability, ATH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to IAFNF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH is more volatile compared to IAFNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.

ATH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATH stands at 19.79B. In comparison, GJNSF has a market cap of 8.76B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH is priced at $83.33, while GJNSF trades at $17.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.42, whereas GJNSF's P/E ratio is 19.47. In terms of profitability, ATH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GJNSF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH is more volatile compared to GJNSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.

ATH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATH stands at 19.79B. In comparison, HLVTY has a market cap of 8.59B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH is priced at $83.33, while HLVTY trades at $4.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.42, whereas HLVTY's P/E ratio is 16.24. In terms of profitability, ATH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to HLVTY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH is less volatile compared to HLVTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.

ATH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATH stands at 19.79B. In comparison, UNPLF has a market cap of 8.34B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH is priced at $83.33, while UNPLF trades at $2.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.42, whereas UNPLF's P/E ratio is 11.35. In terms of profitability, ATH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to UNPLF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH is more volatile compared to UNPLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.

ATH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATH stands at 19.79B. In comparison, SLFIF has a market cap of 7.99B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH is priced at $83.33, while SLFIF trades at $13.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.42, whereas SLFIF's P/E ratio is 2.75. In terms of profitability, ATH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SLFIF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH is more volatile compared to SLFIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.

ATH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATH stands at 19.79B. In comparison, HELNF has a market cap of 7.30B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH is priced at $83.33, while HELNF trades at $137.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.42, whereas HELNF's P/E ratio is 9.97. In terms of profitability, ATH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to HELNF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH is more volatile compared to HELNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.

ATH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATH stands at 19.79B. In comparison, RMRHF has a market cap of 6.47B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH is priced at $83.33, while RMRHF trades at $1.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.42, whereas RMRHF's P/E ratio is 23.38. In terms of profitability, ATH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RMRHF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH is more volatile compared to RMRHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.

ATH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATH stands at 19.79B. In comparison, ACGLN has a market cap of 6.39B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH is priced at $83.33, while ACGLN trades at $17.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.42, whereas ACGLN's P/E ratio is 3.63. In terms of profitability, ATH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ACGLN's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH is more volatile compared to ACGLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.

ATH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATH stands at 19.79B. In comparison, FDIAY has a market cap of 6.38B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH is priced at $83.33, while FDIAY trades at $9.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.42, whereas FDIAY's P/E ratio is 11.14. In terms of profitability, ATH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FDIAY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH is more volatile compared to FDIAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.

ATH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATH stands at 19.79B. In comparison, EQH-PA has a market cap of 6.14B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH is priced at $83.33, while EQH-PA trades at $20.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.42, whereas EQH-PA's P/E ratio is 5.32. In terms of profitability, ATH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to EQH-PA's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH is more volatile compared to EQH-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.

ATH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATH stands at 19.79B. In comparison, MPFRY has a market cap of 6.11B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH is priced at $83.33, while MPFRY trades at $7.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.42, whereas MPFRY's P/E ratio is 11.23. In terms of profitability, ATH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MPFRY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH is less volatile compared to MPFRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.

ATH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATH stands at 19.79B. In comparison, ATH-PE has a market cap of 5.12B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH is priced at $83.33, while ATH-PE trades at $25.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.42, whereas ATH-PE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ATH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ATH-PE's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH is more volatile compared to ATH-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.

ATH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATH stands at 19.79B. In comparison, ATH-PC has a market cap of 5.12B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH is priced at $83.33, while ATH-PC trades at $25.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.42, whereas ATH-PC's P/E ratio is 3.16. In terms of profitability, ATH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ATH-PC's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH is more volatile compared to ATH-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.

ATH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATH stands at 19.79B. In comparison, EQH-PC has a market cap of 5.04B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH is priced at $83.33, while EQH-PC trades at $16.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.42, whereas EQH-PC's P/E ratio is 4.37. In terms of profitability, ATH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to EQH-PC's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH is more volatile compared to EQH-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.

ATH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATH stands at 19.79B. In comparison, ESGRO has a market cap of 5.01B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH is priced at $83.33, while ESGRO trades at $20.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.42, whereas ESGRO's P/E ratio is -13.46. In terms of profitability, ATH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ESGRO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH is more volatile compared to ESGRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.

ATH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATH stands at 19.79B. In comparison, ESGR has a market cap of 4.98B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH is priced at $83.33, while ESGR trades at $334.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.42, whereas ESGR's P/E ratio is 10.70. In terms of profitability, ATH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ESGR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH is more volatile compared to ESGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.

ATH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATH stands at 19.79B. In comparison, ESGRP has a market cap of 4.97B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH is priced at $83.33, while ESGRP trades at $20.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.42, whereas ESGRP's P/E ratio is -13.85. In terms of profitability, ATH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ESGRP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH is more volatile compared to ESGRP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.

ATH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATH stands at 19.79B. In comparison, TPDKY has a market cap of 4.96B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH is priced at $83.33, while TPDKY trades at $5.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.42, whereas TPDKY's P/E ratio is 29.75. In terms of profitability, ATH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TPDKY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH is more volatile compared to TPDKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.

ATH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATH stands at 19.79B. In comparison, ATH-PA has a market cap of 4.84B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH is priced at $83.33, while ATH-PA trades at $23.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.42, whereas ATH-PA's P/E ratio is 2.99. In terms of profitability, ATH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ATH-PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH is more volatile compared to ATH-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.

ATH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATH stands at 19.79B. In comparison, DIISF has a market cap of 4.82B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH is priced at $83.33, while DIISF trades at $3.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.42, whereas DIISF's P/E ratio is 24.73. In terms of profitability, ATH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DIISF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH is less volatile compared to DIISF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.

ATH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATH stands at 19.79B. In comparison, TPDNF has a market cap of 4.72B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH is priced at $83.33, while TPDNF trades at $51.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.42, whereas TPDNF's P/E ratio is 28.46. In terms of profitability, ATH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TPDNF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH is less volatile compared to TPDNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.

ATH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATH stands at 19.79B. In comparison, GIVPY has a market cap of 4.00B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH is priced at $83.33, while GIVPY trades at $6.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.42, whereas GIVPY's P/E ratio is 2.11. In terms of profitability, ATH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GIVPY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH is more volatile compared to GIVPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.

ATH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATH stands at 19.79B. In comparison, YB has a market cap of 3.94B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH is priced at $83.33, while YB trades at $14.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.42, whereas YB's P/E ratio is 66.18. In terms of profitability, ATH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to YB's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ATH is less volatile compared to YB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.

ATH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATH stands at 19.79B. In comparison, ATH-PB has a market cap of 3.93B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH is priced at $83.33, while ATH-PB trades at $19.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.42, whereas ATH-PB's P/E ratio is 2.42. In terms of profitability, ATH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ATH-PB's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH is more volatile compared to ATH-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.

ATH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATH stands at 19.79B. In comparison, GSHD has a market cap of 3.88B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH is priced at $83.33, while GSHD trades at $103.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.42, whereas GSHD's P/E ratio is 86.10. In terms of profitability, ATH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GSHD's ROE of +2.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH is more volatile compared to GSHD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.

ATH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATH stands at 19.79B. In comparison, CNO-PA has a market cap of 3.84B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH is priced at $83.33, while CNO-PA trades at $18.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.42, whereas CNO-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ATH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CNO-PA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH is more volatile compared to CNO-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.

ATH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATH stands at 19.79B. In comparison, GIVSY has a market cap of 3.81B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH is priced at $83.33, while GIVSY trades at $20.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.42, whereas GIVSY's P/E ratio is 3.27. In terms of profitability, ATH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GIVSY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH is less volatile compared to GIVSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.

ATH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATH stands at 19.79B. In comparison, ATH-PD has a market cap of 3.42B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH is priced at $83.33, while ATH-PD trades at $16.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.42, whereas ATH-PD's P/E ratio is 2.11. In terms of profitability, ATH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ATH-PD's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH is more volatile compared to ATH-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.

ATH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATH stands at 19.79B. In comparison, VNRGF has a market cap of 3.38B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH is priced at $83.33, while VNRGF trades at $26.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.42, whereas VNRGF's P/E ratio is 3.70. In terms of profitability, ATH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to VNRGF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH is more volatile compared to VNRGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.

ATH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATH stands at 19.79B. In comparison, AFFT has a market cap of 3.30B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH is priced at $83.33, while AFFT trades at $16.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.42, whereas AFFT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ATH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AFFT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH is more volatile compared to AFFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.

ATH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATH stands at 19.79B. In comparison, AFFS has a market cap of 3.06B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH is priced at $83.33, while AFFS trades at $15.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.42, whereas AFFS's P/E ratio is 15.86. In terms of profitability, ATH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AFFS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH is more volatile compared to AFFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.

ATH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATH stands at 19.79B. In comparison, GCNJF has a market cap of 2.98B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH is priced at $83.33, while GCNJF trades at $25.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.42, whereas GCNJF's P/E ratio is 6.36. In terms of profitability, ATH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GCNJF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ATH is more volatile compared to GCNJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.

ATH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATH stands at 19.79B. In comparison, ABDBY has a market cap of 2.92B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH is priced at $83.33, while ABDBY trades at $4.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.42, whereas ABDBY's P/E ratio is -67.33. In terms of profitability, ATH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ABDBY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH is more volatile compared to ABDBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.

ATH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATH stands at 19.79B. In comparison, FIHL has a market cap of 1.90B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH is priced at $83.33, while FIHL trades at $17.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.42, whereas FIHL's P/E ratio is 17.35. In terms of profitability, ATH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FIHL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH is more volatile compared to FIHL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.

ATH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATH stands at 19.79B. In comparison, RZC has a market cap of 1.74B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH is priced at $83.33, while RZC trades at $25.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.42, whereas RZC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ATH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RZC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH is more volatile compared to RZC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.

ATH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATH stands at 19.79B. In comparison, MNRHF has a market cap of 1.56B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH is priced at $83.33, while MNRHF trades at $25.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.42, whereas MNRHF's P/E ratio is 7.30. In terms of profitability, ATH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MNRHF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH is more volatile compared to MNRHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.

ATH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATH stands at 19.79B. In comparison, IGIC has a market cap of 1.04B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH is priced at $83.33, while IGIC trades at $23.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.42, whereas IGIC's P/E ratio is 7.72. In terms of profitability, ATH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to IGIC's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH is more volatile compared to IGIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.

ATH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATH stands at 19.79B. In comparison, VNRFY has a market cap of 743.68M. Regarding current trading prices, ATH is priced at $83.33, while VNRFY trades at $5.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.42, whereas VNRFY's P/E ratio is 6.38. In terms of profitability, ATH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to VNRFY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH is less volatile compared to VNRFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.

ATH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATH stands at 19.79B. In comparison, ARGD has a market cap of 698.91M. Regarding current trading prices, ATH is priced at $83.33, while ARGD trades at $19.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.42, whereas ARGD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ATH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ARGD's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH is less volatile compared to ARGD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.

ATH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATH stands at 19.79B. In comparison, AIFIF has a market cap of 462.78M. Regarding current trading prices, ATH is priced at $83.33, while AIFIF trades at $0.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.42, whereas AIFIF's P/E ratio is 4.83. In terms of profitability, ATH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AIFIF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ATH is more volatile compared to AIFIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.

ATH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATH stands at 19.79B. In comparison, SGPLF has a market cap of 280.19M. Regarding current trading prices, ATH is priced at $83.33, while SGPLF trades at $2.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.42, whereas SGPLF's P/E ratio is -0.87. In terms of profitability, ATH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SGPLF's ROE of -2.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH is more volatile compared to SGPLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.

ATH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATH stands at 19.79B. In comparison, ERPRF has a market cap of 163.76M. Regarding current trading prices, ATH is priced at $83.33, while ERPRF trades at $5.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.42, whereas ERPRF's P/E ratio is 7.54. In terms of profitability, ATH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ERPRF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ATH is more volatile compared to ERPRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.

ATH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATH stands at 19.79B. In comparison, WDH has a market cap of 45.21M. Regarding current trading prices, ATH is priced at $83.33, while WDH trades at $1.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.42, whereas WDH's P/E ratio is 8.93. In terms of profitability, ATH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to WDH's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH is less volatile compared to WDH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.

ATH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATH stands at 19.79B. In comparison, FGF has a market cap of 21.88M. Regarding current trading prices, ATH is priced at $83.33, while FGF trades at $17.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.42, whereas FGF's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, ATH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FGF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH is more volatile compared to FGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.

ATH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATH stands at 19.79B. In comparison, TSCHY has a market cap of 21.20M. Regarding current trading prices, ATH is priced at $83.33, while TSCHY trades at $0.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.42, whereas TSCHY's P/E ratio is -1.12. In terms of profitability, ATH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TSCHY's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH is more volatile compared to TSCHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.

ATH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATH stands at 19.79B. In comparison, FGFPP has a market cap of 20.99M. Regarding current trading prices, ATH is priced at $83.33, while FGFPP trades at $16.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.42, whereas FGFPP's P/E ratio is -6.51. In terms of profitability, ATH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FGFPP's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH is more volatile compared to FGFPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.

ATH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATH stands at 19.79B. In comparison, NDEV has a market cap of 4.59M. Regarding current trading prices, ATH is priced at $83.33, while NDEV trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.42, whereas NDEV's P/E ratio is 46.86. In terms of profitability, ATH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NDEV's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH is less volatile compared to NDEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.

ATH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATH stands at 19.79B. In comparison, CNCPF has a market cap of 1.60M. Regarding current trading prices, ATH is priced at $83.33, while CNCPF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.42, whereas CNCPF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ATH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CNCPF's ROE of +2.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH is more volatile compared to CNCPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.

ATH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATH stands at 19.79B. In comparison, CWID comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ATH is priced at $83.33, while CWID trades at $2.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.42, whereas CWID's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ATH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CWID's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ATH is more volatile compared to CWID. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.

ATH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATH stands at 19.79B. In comparison, ANAT comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ATH is priced at $83.33, while ANAT trades at $188.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.42, whereas ANAT's P/E ratio is 6.73. In terms of profitability, ATH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ANAT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH is more volatile compared to ANAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.

ATH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATH stands at 19.79B. In comparison, WTREP comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ATH is priced at $83.33, while WTREP trades at $25.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.42, whereas WTREP's P/E ratio is 1.35. In terms of profitability, ATH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to WTREP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH is more volatile compared to WTREP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.

ATH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATH stands at 19.79B. In comparison, IGICW comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ATH is priced at $83.33, while IGICW trades at $1.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.42, whereas IGICW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ATH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to IGICW's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH is less volatile compared to IGICW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.