Astrocast SA
Astrocast SA ASROF Peers
See (ASROF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Communication Equipment Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASROF | $0.95 | +8.99% | 36.3M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| ERIXF | $8.62 | N/A | 28.7B | 172.40 | $0.05 | +3.16% |
| NOKBF | $5.38 | -0.09% | 28.1B | 21.50 | $0.25 | +3.01% |
| ZTCOF | $2.91 | +6.33% | 20.3B | 12.12 | $0.24 | +6.25% |
| AACAY | $4.83 | -0.90% | 5.7B | 22.98 | $0.21 | +0.09% |
| AACAF | $4.53 | N/A | 5.4B | 21.57 | $0.21 | +0.09% |
| YZOFF | $1.03 | N/A | 2.6B | 4.90 | $0.21 | +1.05% |
| HMNKF | $36.65 | N/A | 1.8B | 55.53 | $0.66 | N/A |
| VTKLY | $7.06 | +5.85% | 1.8B | 11.39 | $0.62 | +8.72% |
| ETCMY | $0.78 | -6.02% | 1.5B | -1.32 | -$0.59 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
ASROF vs ERIXF Comparison
ASROF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASROF stands at 36.3M. In comparison, ERIXF has a market cap of 28.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ASROF is priced at $0.95, while ERIXF trades at $8.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASROF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ERIXF's P/E ratio is 172.40. In terms of profitability, ASROF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to ERIXF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ASROF is less volatile compared to ERIXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASROF.
ASROF vs NOKBF Comparison
ASROF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASROF stands at 36.3M. In comparison, NOKBF has a market cap of 28.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ASROF is priced at $0.95, while NOKBF trades at $5.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASROF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NOKBF's P/E ratio is 21.50. In terms of profitability, ASROF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to NOKBF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ASROF and NOKBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ASROF vs ZTCOF Comparison
ASROF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASROF stands at 36.3M. In comparison, ZTCOF has a market cap of 20.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ASROF is priced at $0.95, while ZTCOF trades at $2.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASROF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZTCOF's P/E ratio is 12.12. In terms of profitability, ASROF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to ZTCOF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ASROF and ZTCOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ASROF vs AACAY Comparison
ASROF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASROF stands at 36.3M. In comparison, AACAY has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ASROF is priced at $0.95, while AACAY trades at $4.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASROF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AACAY's P/E ratio is 22.98. In terms of profitability, ASROF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to AACAY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ASROF is less volatile compared to AACAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASROF.
ASROF vs AACAF Comparison
ASROF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASROF stands at 36.3M. In comparison, AACAF has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ASROF is priced at $0.95, while AACAF trades at $4.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASROF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AACAF's P/E ratio is 21.57. In terms of profitability, ASROF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to AACAF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ASROF is less volatile compared to AACAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASROF.
ASROF vs YZOFF Comparison
ASROF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASROF stands at 36.3M. In comparison, YZOFF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ASROF is priced at $0.95, while YZOFF trades at $1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASROF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YZOFF's P/E ratio is 4.90. In terms of profitability, ASROF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to YZOFF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ASROF is less volatile compared to YZOFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASROF.
ASROF vs HMNKF Comparison
ASROF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASROF stands at 36.3M. In comparison, HMNKF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ASROF is priced at $0.95, while HMNKF trades at $36.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASROF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HMNKF's P/E ratio is 55.53. In terms of profitability, ASROF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to HMNKF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ASROF and HMNKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ASROF vs VTKLY Comparison
ASROF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASROF stands at 36.3M. In comparison, VTKLY has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ASROF is priced at $0.95, while VTKLY trades at $7.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASROF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VTKLY's P/E ratio is 11.39. In terms of profitability, ASROF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to VTKLY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ASROF and VTKLY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ASROF vs ETCMY Comparison
ASROF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASROF stands at 36.3M. In comparison, ETCMY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ASROF is priced at $0.95, while ETCMY trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASROF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ETCMY's P/E ratio is -1.32. In terms of profitability, ASROF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to ETCMY's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ASROF is less volatile compared to ETCMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASROF.
ASROF vs VTKLF Comparison
ASROF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASROF stands at 36.3M. In comparison, VTKLF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ASROF is priced at $0.95, while VTKLF trades at $5.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASROF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VTKLF's P/E ratio is 9.37. In terms of profitability, ASROF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to VTKLF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ASROF is less volatile compared to VTKLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASROF.
ASROF vs FXCNF Comparison
ASROF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASROF stands at 36.3M. In comparison, FXCNF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ASROF is priced at $0.95, while FXCNF trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASROF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FXCNF's P/E ratio is -41.67. In terms of profitability, ASROF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to FXCNF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ASROF is less volatile compared to FXCNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASROF.
ASROF vs ADVOF Comparison
ASROF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASROF stands at 36.3M. In comparison, ADVOF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ASROF is priced at $0.95, while ADVOF trades at $20.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASROF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADVOF's P/E ratio is -40.88. In terms of profitability, ASROF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to ADVOF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ASROF is less volatile compared to ADVOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASROF.
ASROF vs EUTLF Comparison
ASROF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASROF stands at 36.3M. In comparison, EUTLF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ASROF is priced at $0.95, while EUTLF trades at $2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASROF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EUTLF's P/E ratio is -0.97. In terms of profitability, ASROF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to EUTLF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ASROF is less volatile compared to EUTLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASROF.
ASROF vs HTCKF Comparison
ASROF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASROF stands at 36.3M. In comparison, HTCKF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ASROF is priced at $0.95, while HTCKF trades at $6.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASROF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HTCKF's P/E ratio is -14.13. In terms of profitability, ASROF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to HTCKF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ASROF and HTCKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ASROF vs FXCNY Comparison
ASROF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASROF stands at 36.3M. In comparison, FXCNY has a market cap of 939.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ASROF is priced at $0.95, while FXCNY trades at $11.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASROF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FXCNY's P/E ratio is -44.27. In terms of profitability, ASROF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to FXCNY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ASROF is less volatile compared to FXCNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASROF.
ASROF vs OKIEY Comparison
ASROF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASROF stands at 36.3M. In comparison, OKIEY has a market cap of 925.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ASROF is priced at $0.95, while OKIEY trades at $10.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASROF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OKIEY's P/E ratio is 10.68. In terms of profitability, ASROF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to OKIEY's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ASROF is less volatile compared to OKIEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASROF.
ASROF vs UBLXF Comparison
ASROF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASROF stands at 36.3M. In comparison, UBLXF has a market cap of 827.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ASROF is priced at $0.95, while UBLXF trades at $109.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASROF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UBLXF's P/E ratio is -7.50. In terms of profitability, ASROF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to UBLXF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ASROF is less volatile compared to UBLXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASROF.
ASROF vs COBJF Comparison
ASROF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASROF stands at 36.3M. In comparison, COBJF has a market cap of 702.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ASROF is priced at $0.95, while COBJF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASROF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COBJF's P/E ratio is -7.59. In terms of profitability, ASROF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to COBJF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ASROF is less volatile compared to COBJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASROF.
ASROF vs EVTZF Comparison
ASROF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASROF stands at 36.3M. In comparison, EVTZF has a market cap of 667.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ASROF is priced at $0.95, while EVTZF trades at $8.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASROF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EVTZF's P/E ratio is 15.46. In terms of profitability, ASROF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to EVTZF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ASROF is less volatile compared to EVTZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASROF.
ASROF vs OKIEF Comparison
ASROF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASROF stands at 36.3M. In comparison, OKIEF has a market cap of 577.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ASROF is priced at $0.95, while OKIEF trades at $6.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASROF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OKIEF's P/E ratio is 6.67. In terms of profitability, ASROF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to OKIEF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ASROF is less volatile compared to OKIEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASROF.
ASROF vs EVSBY Comparison
ASROF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASROF stands at 36.3M. In comparison, EVSBY has a market cap of 526M. Regarding current trading prices, ASROF is priced at $0.95, while EVSBY trades at $9.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASROF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EVSBY's P/E ratio is 11.34. In terms of profitability, ASROF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to EVSBY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ASROF is less volatile compared to EVSBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASROF.
ASROF vs SATOF Comparison
ASROF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASROF stands at 36.3M. In comparison, SATOF has a market cap of 465.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ASROF is priced at $0.95, while SATOF trades at $14.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASROF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SATOF's P/E ratio is 10.61. In terms of profitability, ASROF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to SATOF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ASROF and SATOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ASROF vs FLTCF Comparison
ASROF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASROF stands at 36.3M. In comparison, FLTCF has a market cap of 413.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ASROF is priced at $0.95, while FLTCF trades at $1.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASROF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLTCF's P/E ratio is 31.50. In terms of profitability, ASROF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to FLTCF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ASROF is less volatile compared to FLTCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASROF.
ASROF vs PAOTF Comparison
ASROF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASROF stands at 36.3M. In comparison, PAOTF has a market cap of 376.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ASROF is priced at $0.95, while PAOTF trades at $12.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASROF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PAOTF's P/E ratio is -16.55. In terms of profitability, ASROF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to PAOTF's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, ASROF is less volatile compared to PAOTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASROF.
ASROF vs VNWTF Comparison
ASROF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASROF stands at 36.3M. In comparison, VNWTF has a market cap of 177.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ASROF is priced at $0.95, while VNWTF trades at $7.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASROF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VNWTF's P/E ratio is 66.36. In terms of profitability, ASROF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to VNWTF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ASROF and VNWTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ASROF vs QTRHF Comparison
ASROF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASROF stands at 36.3M. In comparison, QTRHF has a market cap of 118.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ASROF is priced at $0.95, while QTRHF trades at $1.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASROF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QTRHF's P/E ratio is -7.85. In terms of profitability, ASROF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to QTRHF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ASROF and QTRHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ASROF vs SIMTF Comparison
ASROF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASROF stands at 36.3M. In comparison, SIMTF has a market cap of 111.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ASROF is priced at $0.95, while SIMTF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASROF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SIMTF's P/E ratio is -5.20. In terms of profitability, ASROF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to SIMTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ASROF is less volatile compared to SIMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASROF.
ASROF vs ATSKF Comparison
ASROF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASROF stands at 36.3M. In comparison, ATSKF has a market cap of 93.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ASROF is priced at $0.95, while ATSKF trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASROF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATSKF's P/E ratio is 7.30. In terms of profitability, ASROF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to ATSKF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ASROF is less volatile compared to ATSKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASROF.
ASROF vs NPNZF Comparison
ASROF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASROF stands at 36.3M. In comparison, NPNZF has a market cap of 92.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ASROF is priced at $0.95, while NPNZF trades at $8.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASROF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NPNZF's P/E ratio is -11.23. In terms of profitability, ASROF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to NPNZF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ASROF and NPNZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ASROF vs BEWFF Comparison
ASROF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASROF stands at 36.3M. In comparison, BEWFF has a market cap of 50.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ASROF is priced at $0.95, while BEWFF trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASROF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BEWFF's P/E ratio is 57.00. In terms of profitability, ASROF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to BEWFF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ASROF is less volatile compared to BEWFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASROF.
ASROF vs ELSLF Comparison
ASROF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASROF stands at 36.3M. In comparison, ELSLF has a market cap of 48.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ASROF is priced at $0.95, while ELSLF trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASROF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELSLF's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, ASROF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to ELSLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ASROF and ELSLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ASROF vs CYSNF Comparison
ASROF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASROF stands at 36.3M. In comparison, CYSNF has a market cap of 31.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ASROF is priced at $0.95, while CYSNF trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASROF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CYSNF's P/E ratio is -74.87. In terms of profitability, ASROF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to CYSNF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ASROF is less volatile compared to CYSNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASROF.
ASROF vs BYLTF Comparison
ASROF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASROF stands at 36.3M. In comparison, BYLTF has a market cap of 30.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ASROF is priced at $0.95, while BYLTF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASROF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BYLTF's P/E ratio is -5.01. In terms of profitability, ASROF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to BYLTF's ROE of +1.61%. Regarding short-term risk, ASROF is less volatile compared to BYLTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASROF.
ASROF vs WSTL Comparison
ASROF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASROF stands at 36.3M. In comparison, WSTL has a market cap of 30.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ASROF is priced at $0.95, while WSTL trades at $3.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASROF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WSTL's P/E ratio is -8.97. In terms of profitability, ASROF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to WSTL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ASROF is less volatile compared to WSTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASROF.
ASROF vs MOYFF Comparison
ASROF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASROF stands at 36.3M. In comparison, MOYFF has a market cap of 19.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ASROF is priced at $0.95, while MOYFF trades at $3.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASROF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MOYFF's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, ASROF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to MOYFF's ROE of +8.70%. Regarding short-term risk, ASROF and MOYFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ASROF vs AAPJ Comparison
ASROF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASROF stands at 36.3M. In comparison, AAPJ has a market cap of 17.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ASROF is priced at $0.95, while AAPJ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASROF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AAPJ's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ASROF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to AAPJ's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ASROF and AAPJ have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ASROF vs ENAFF Comparison
ASROF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASROF stands at 36.3M. In comparison, ENAFF has a market cap of 16.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ASROF is priced at $0.95, while ENAFF trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASROF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ENAFF's P/E ratio is -0.66. In terms of profitability, ASROF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to ENAFF's ROE of +0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, ASROF is less volatile compared to ENAFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASROF.
ASROF vs MILOF Comparison
ASROF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASROF stands at 36.3M. In comparison, MILOF has a market cap of 12.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ASROF is priced at $0.95, while MILOF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASROF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MILOF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ASROF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to MILOF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ASROF and MILOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ASROF vs ATGN Comparison
ASROF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASROF stands at 36.3M. In comparison, ATGN has a market cap of 9.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ASROF is priced at $0.95, while ATGN trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASROF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATGN's P/E ratio is -4.07. In terms of profitability, ASROF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to ATGN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ASROF is less volatile compared to ATGN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASROF.
ASROF vs KPIFF Comparison
ASROF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASROF stands at 36.3M. In comparison, KPIFF has a market cap of 9M. Regarding current trading prices, ASROF is priced at $0.95, while KPIFF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASROF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KPIFF's P/E ratio is -3.77. In terms of profitability, ASROF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to KPIFF's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, ASROF is less volatile compared to KPIFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASROF.
ASROF vs CYCA Comparison
ASROF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASROF stands at 36.3M. In comparison, CYCA has a market cap of 8.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ASROF is priced at $0.95, while CYCA trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASROF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CYCA's P/E ratio is -1.72. In terms of profitability, ASROF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to CYCA's ROE of +5.72%. Regarding short-term risk, ASROF and CYCA have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ASROF vs LTCCF Comparison
ASROF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASROF stands at 36.3M. In comparison, LTCCF has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ASROF is priced at $0.95, while LTCCF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASROF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LTCCF's P/E ratio is -2.96. In terms of profitability, ASROF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to LTCCF's ROE of +0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, ASROF and LTCCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ASROF vs VMNT Comparison
ASROF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASROF stands at 36.3M. In comparison, VMNT has a market cap of 6.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ASROF is priced at $0.95, while VMNT trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASROF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VMNT's P/E ratio is -4.15. In terms of profitability, ASROF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to VMNT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ASROF is less volatile compared to VMNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASROF.
ASROF vs ISEYF Comparison
ASROF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASROF stands at 36.3M. In comparison, ISEYF has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ASROF is priced at $0.95, while ISEYF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASROF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ISEYF's P/E ratio is -2.64. In terms of profitability, ASROF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to ISEYF's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, ASROF is less volatile compared to ISEYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASROF.
ASROF vs TTLTF Comparison
ASROF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASROF stands at 36.3M. In comparison, TTLTF has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, ASROF is priced at $0.95, while TTLTF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASROF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TTLTF's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, ASROF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to TTLTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ASROF is less volatile compared to TTLTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASROF.
ASROF vs STRH Comparison
ASROF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASROF stands at 36.3M. In comparison, STRH has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ASROF is priced at $0.95, while STRH trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASROF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STRH's P/E ratio is -5.77. In terms of profitability, ASROF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to STRH's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ASROF is less volatile compared to STRH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASROF.
ASROF vs WLAN Comparison
ASROF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASROF stands at 36.3M. In comparison, WLAN has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, ASROF is priced at $0.95, while WLAN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASROF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WLAN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ASROF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to WLAN's ROE of +0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, ASROF is less volatile compared to WLAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASROF.
ASROF vs HPNN Comparison
ASROF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASROF stands at 36.3M. In comparison, HPNN has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, ASROF is priced at $0.95, while HPNN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASROF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HPNN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ASROF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to HPNN's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ASROF is less volatile compared to HPNN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASROF.
ASROF vs NRRWF Comparison
ASROF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASROF stands at 36.3M. In comparison, NRRWF has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ASROF is priced at $0.95, while NRRWF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASROF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NRRWF's P/E ratio is -0.58. In terms of profitability, ASROF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to NRRWF's ROE of -8.90%. Regarding short-term risk, ASROF is less volatile compared to NRRWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASROF.
ASROF vs NVRVF Comparison
ASROF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASROF stands at 36.3M. In comparison, NVRVF has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ASROF is priced at $0.95, while NVRVF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASROF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NVRVF's P/E ratio is -1.53. In terms of profitability, ASROF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to NVRVF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ASROF and NVRVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ASROF vs LMGR Comparison
ASROF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASROF stands at 36.3M. In comparison, LMGR has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ASROF is priced at $0.95, while LMGR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASROF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LMGR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ASROF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to LMGR's ROE of +93.87%. Regarding short-term risk, ASROF is less volatile compared to LMGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASROF.
ASROF vs CNTFY Comparison
ASROF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASROF stands at 36.3M. In comparison, CNTFY has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ASROF is priced at $0.95, while CNTFY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASROF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNTFY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ASROF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to CNTFY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ASROF and CNTFY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ASROF vs MFCO Comparison
ASROF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASROF stands at 36.3M. In comparison, MFCO has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ASROF is priced at $0.95, while MFCO trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASROF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MFCO's P/E ratio is 11.20. In terms of profitability, ASROF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to MFCO's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, ASROF and MFCO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ASROF vs BDRL Comparison
ASROF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASROF stands at 36.3M. In comparison, BDRL has a market cap of 668.4K. Regarding current trading prices, ASROF is priced at $0.95, while BDRL trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASROF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BDRL's P/E ratio is -1.25. In terms of profitability, ASROF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to BDRL's ROE of +1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ASROF is less volatile compared to BDRL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASROF.
ASROF vs MLRT Comparison
ASROF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASROF stands at 36.3M. In comparison, MLRT has a market cap of 595.8K. Regarding current trading prices, ASROF is priced at $0.95, while MLRT trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASROF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MLRT's P/E ratio is -0.79. In terms of profitability, ASROF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to MLRT's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ASROF is less volatile compared to MLRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASROF.
ASROF vs ATCLF Comparison
ASROF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASROF stands at 36.3M. In comparison, ATCLF has a market cap of 493.5K. Regarding current trading prices, ASROF is priced at $0.95, while ATCLF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASROF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATCLF's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, ASROF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to ATCLF's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, ASROF is less volatile compared to ATCLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASROF.
ASROF vs ELST Comparison
ASROF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASROF stands at 36.3M. In comparison, ELST has a market cap of 445.2K. Regarding current trading prices, ASROF is priced at $0.95, while ELST trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASROF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELST's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, ASROF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to ELST's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ASROF is less volatile compared to ELST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASROF.
ASROF vs CRMK Comparison
ASROF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASROF stands at 36.3M. In comparison, CRMK has a market cap of 441.4K. Regarding current trading prices, ASROF is priced at $0.95, while CRMK trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASROF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRMK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ASROF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to CRMK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ASROF is less volatile compared to CRMK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASROF.
ASROF vs AXBSF Comparison
ASROF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASROF stands at 36.3M. In comparison, AXBSF has a market cap of 425.9K. Regarding current trading prices, ASROF is priced at $0.95, while AXBSF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASROF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AXBSF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ASROF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to AXBSF's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, ASROF is less volatile compared to AXBSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASROF.
ASROF vs BKSD Comparison
ASROF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASROF stands at 36.3M. In comparison, BKSD has a market cap of 273.9K. Regarding current trading prices, ASROF is priced at $0.95, while BKSD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASROF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BKSD's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ASROF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to BKSD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ASROF and BKSD have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ASROF vs WGNR Comparison
ASROF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASROF stands at 36.3M. In comparison, WGNR has a market cap of 146.6K. Regarding current trading prices, ASROF is priced at $0.95, while WGNR trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASROF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WGNR's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, ASROF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to WGNR's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ASROF is less volatile compared to WGNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASROF.
ASROF vs CAMPQ Comparison
ASROF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASROF stands at 36.3M. In comparison, CAMPQ has a market cap of 120.6K. Regarding current trading prices, ASROF is priced at $0.95, while CAMPQ trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASROF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CAMPQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ASROF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to CAMPQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ASROF is less volatile compared to CAMPQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASROF.
ASROF vs VCTY Comparison
ASROF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASROF stands at 36.3M. In comparison, VCTY has a market cap of 95.9K. Regarding current trading prices, ASROF is priced at $0.95, while VCTY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASROF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VCTY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ASROF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to VCTY's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ASROF is less volatile compared to VCTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASROF.
ASROF vs ERFB Comparison
ASROF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASROF stands at 36.3M. In comparison, ERFB has a market cap of 84.1K. Regarding current trading prices, ASROF is priced at $0.95, while ERFB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASROF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ERFB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ASROF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to ERFB's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ASROF and ERFB have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ASROF vs PDXP Comparison
ASROF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASROF stands at 36.3M. In comparison, PDXP has a market cap of 81.7K. Regarding current trading prices, ASROF is priced at $0.95, while PDXP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASROF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PDXP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ASROF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to PDXP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ASROF is less volatile compared to PDXP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASROF.
ASROF vs EZEN Comparison
ASROF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASROF stands at 36.3M. In comparison, EZEN has a market cap of 72.6K. Regarding current trading prices, ASROF is priced at $0.95, while EZEN trades at $3,300.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASROF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EZEN's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, ASROF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to EZEN's ROE of -1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ASROF has daily volatility of 0.00 and EZEN has daily volatility of N/A.
ASROF vs PMOZ Comparison
ASROF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASROF stands at 36.3M. In comparison, PMOZ has a market cap of 68.2K. Regarding current trading prices, ASROF is priced at $0.95, while PMOZ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASROF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PMOZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ASROF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to PMOZ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ASROF and PMOZ have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ASROF vs CRLI Comparison
ASROF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASROF stands at 36.3M. In comparison, CRLI has a market cap of 60.5K. Regarding current trading prices, ASROF is priced at $0.95, while CRLI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASROF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRLI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ASROF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to CRLI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ASROF and CRLI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ASROF vs IPTK Comparison
ASROF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASROF stands at 36.3M. In comparison, IPTK has a market cap of 28.7K. Regarding current trading prices, ASROF is priced at $0.95, while IPTK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASROF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IPTK's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ASROF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to IPTK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ASROF is less volatile compared to IPTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASROF.
ASROF vs ETCIA Comparison
ASROF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASROF stands at 36.3M. In comparison, ETCIA has a market cap of 25.1K. Regarding current trading prices, ASROF is priced at $0.95, while ETCIA trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASROF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ETCIA's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, ASROF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to ETCIA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ASROF is less volatile compared to ETCIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASROF.
ASROF vs LTTC Comparison
ASROF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASROF stands at 36.3M. In comparison, LTTC has a market cap of 12K. Regarding current trading prices, ASROF is priced at $0.95, while LTTC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASROF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LTTC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ASROF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to LTTC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ASROF and LTTC have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ASROF vs FBCE Comparison
ASROF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASROF stands at 36.3M. In comparison, FBCE has a market cap of 10K. Regarding current trading prices, ASROF is priced at $0.95, while FBCE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASROF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FBCE's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ASROF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to FBCE's ROE of -1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, ASROF is less volatile compared to FBCE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASROF.
ASROF vs OTOW Comparison
ASROF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASROF stands at 36.3M. In comparison, OTOW has a market cap of 8.8K. Regarding current trading prices, ASROF is priced at $0.95, while OTOW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASROF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OTOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ASROF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to OTOW's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ASROF and OTOW have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ASROF vs TPTW Comparison
ASROF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASROF stands at 36.3M. In comparison, TPTW has a market cap of 7.4K. Regarding current trading prices, ASROF is priced at $0.95, while TPTW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASROF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TPTW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ASROF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to TPTW's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ASROF and TPTW have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ASROF vs UTRK Comparison
ASROF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASROF stands at 36.3M. In comparison, UTRK has a market cap of 5.9K. Regarding current trading prices, ASROF is priced at $0.95, while UTRK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASROF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UTRK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ASROF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to UTRK's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, ASROF is less volatile compared to UTRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASROF.
ASROF vs JUMT Comparison
ASROF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASROF stands at 36.3M. In comparison, JUMT has a market cap of 4.6K. Regarding current trading prices, ASROF is priced at $0.95, while JUMT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASROF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JUMT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ASROF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to JUMT's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, ASROF is less volatile compared to JUMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASROF.
ASROF vs AVSR Comparison
ASROF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASROF stands at 36.3M. In comparison, AVSR has a market cap of 4.1K. Regarding current trading prices, ASROF is priced at $0.95, while AVSR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASROF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AVSR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ASROF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to AVSR's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, ASROF and AVSR have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ASROF vs MPEG Comparison
ASROF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASROF stands at 36.3M. In comparison, MPEG has a market cap of 3.8K. Regarding current trading prices, ASROF is priced at $0.95, while MPEG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASROF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MPEG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ASROF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to MPEG's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, ASROF and MPEG have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ASROF vs WIRX Comparison
ASROF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASROF stands at 36.3M. In comparison, WIRX has a market cap of 3.5K. Regarding current trading prices, ASROF is priced at $0.95, while WIRX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASROF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WIRX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ASROF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to WIRX's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ASROF is less volatile compared to WIRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASROF.
ASROF vs CYBD Comparison
ASROF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASROF stands at 36.3M. In comparison, CYBD has a market cap of 3.4K. Regarding current trading prices, ASROF is priced at $0.95, while CYBD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASROF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CYBD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ASROF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to CYBD's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, ASROF and CYBD have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ASROF vs VRCM Comparison
ASROF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASROF stands at 36.3M. In comparison, VRCM has a market cap of 3K. Regarding current trading prices, ASROF is priced at $0.95, while VRCM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASROF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VRCM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ASROF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to VRCM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ASROF is less volatile compared to VRCM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASROF.
ASROF vs IZNN Comparison
ASROF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASROF stands at 36.3M. In comparison, IZNN has a market cap of 2.5K. Regarding current trading prices, ASROF is priced at $0.95, while IZNN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASROF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IZNN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ASROF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to IZNN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ASROF is less volatile compared to IZNN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASROF.
ASROF vs PRXM Comparison
ASROF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASROF stands at 36.3M. In comparison, PRXM has a market cap of 2.4K. Regarding current trading prices, ASROF is priced at $0.95, while PRXM trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASROF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRXM's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, ASROF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to PRXM's ROE of -1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, ASROF and PRXM have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ASROF vs RPDT Comparison
ASROF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASROF stands at 36.3M. In comparison, RPDT has a market cap of 2.2K. Regarding current trading prices, ASROF is priced at $0.95, while RPDT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASROF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RPDT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ASROF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to RPDT's ROE of +3.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ASROF is less volatile compared to RPDT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASROF.
ASROF vs XCOMQ Comparison
ASROF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASROF stands at 36.3M. In comparison, XCOMQ has a market cap of 1.7K. Regarding current trading prices, ASROF is priced at $0.95, while XCOMQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASROF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XCOMQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ASROF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to XCOMQ's ROE of +2.29%. Regarding short-term risk, ASROF is less volatile compared to XCOMQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASROF.
ASROF vs RITT Comparison
ASROF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASROF stands at 36.3M. In comparison, RITT has a market cap of 1.6K. Regarding current trading prices, ASROF is priced at $0.95, while RITT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASROF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RITT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ASROF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to RITT's ROE of -1.66%. Regarding short-term risk, ASROF is less volatile compared to RITT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASROF.
ASROF vs ZSTN Comparison
ASROF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASROF stands at 36.3M. In comparison, ZSTN has a market cap of 1.2K. Regarding current trading prices, ASROF is priced at $0.95, while ZSTN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASROF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZSTN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ASROF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to ZSTN's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, ASROF is less volatile compared to ZSTN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASROF.
ASROF vs ABILF Comparison
ASROF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASROF stands at 36.3M. In comparison, ABILF has a market cap of 799. Regarding current trading prices, ASROF is priced at $0.95, while ABILF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASROF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABILF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ASROF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to ABILF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ASROF and ABILF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ASROF vs GNRD Comparison
ASROF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASROF stands at 36.3M. In comparison, GNRD has a market cap of 353. Regarding current trading prices, ASROF is priced at $0.95, while GNRD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASROF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GNRD's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ASROF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to GNRD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ASROF and GNRD have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ASROF vs ZTNO Comparison
ASROF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASROF stands at 36.3M. In comparison, ZTNO has a market cap of 301. Regarding current trading prices, ASROF is priced at $0.95, while ZTNO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASROF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZTNO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ASROF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to ZTNO's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ASROF is less volatile compared to ZTNO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASROF.
ASROF vs ORSX Comparison
ASROF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASROF stands at 36.3M. In comparison, ORSX has a market cap of 300. Regarding current trading prices, ASROF is priced at $0.95, while ORSX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASROF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ORSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ASROF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to ORSX's ROE of -2.51%. Regarding short-term risk, ASROF is less volatile compared to ORSX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASROF.
ASROF vs TCCO Comparison
ASROF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASROF stands at 36.3M. In comparison, TCCO has a market cap of 185. Regarding current trading prices, ASROF is priced at $0.95, while TCCO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASROF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TCCO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ASROF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to TCCO's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, ASROF and TCCO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ASROF vs HDIH Comparison
ASROF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASROF stands at 36.3M. In comparison, HDIH has a market cap of 45. Regarding current trading prices, ASROF is priced at $0.95, while HDIH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASROF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HDIH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ASROF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to HDIH's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ASROF and HDIH have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ASROF vs LMSC Comparison
ASROF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASROF stands at 36.3M. In comparison, LMSC has a market cap of 31. Regarding current trading prices, ASROF is priced at $0.95, while LMSC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASROF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LMSC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ASROF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to LMSC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ASROF and LMSC have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ASROF vs STCI Comparison
ASROF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASROF stands at 36.3M. In comparison, STCI has a market cap of 20. Regarding current trading prices, ASROF is priced at $0.95, while STCI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASROF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STCI's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ASROF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to STCI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ASROF and STCI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ASROF vs BETW Comparison
ASROF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASROF stands at 36.3M. In comparison, BETW has a market cap of 3. Regarding current trading prices, ASROF is priced at $0.95, while BETW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASROF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BETW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ASROF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to BETW's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ASROF is less volatile compared to BETW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASROF.
ASROF vs DGIV Comparison
ASROF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASROF stands at 36.3M. In comparison, DGIV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ASROF is priced at $0.95, while DGIV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASROF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DGIV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ASROF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to DGIV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ASROF is less volatile compared to DGIV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASROF.
ASROF vs AXCP Comparison
ASROF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASROF stands at 36.3M. In comparison, AXCP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ASROF is priced at $0.95, while AXCP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASROF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AXCP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ASROF's ROE is -1.42%, compared to AXCP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ASROF and AXCP have similar daily volatility (0.00).