Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd.
Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. (ASM.TO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (ASM.TO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Other Precious Metals Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASM.TO | CA$4.40 | -6.58% | 637M | 31.43 | CA$0.14 | N/A |
| TFPM.TO | CA$31.83 | -1.91% | 6.6B | 795.75 | CA$0.04 | +0.96% |
| CGG.TO | CA$11.89 | -2.78% | 4.7B | 19.82 | CA$0.60 | +0.93% |
| SIL.TO | CA$15.01 | -8.64% | 2.2B | 18.30 | CA$0.82 | N/A |
| PPTA.TO | CA$20.67 | -3.00% | 2.2B | -51.67 | -CA$0.40 | N/A |
| EDR.TO | CA$7.24 | -4.99% | 2.1B | -21.29 | -CA$0.34 | N/A |
| GMIN.TO | CA$16.26 | -5.47% | 1.7B | 22.90 | CA$0.71 | N/A |
| ARIS.TO | CA$9.50 | -4.04% | 1.7B | 43.18 | CA$0.22 | N/A |
| GATO.TO | CA$21.59 | +5.73% | 1.5B | 32.22 | CA$0.67 | N/A |
| SLS.TO | CA$6.48 | -6.09% | 1.1B | -9.26 | -CA$0.70 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
ASM.TO vs TFPM.TO Comparison July 2025
ASM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM.TO stands at 637M. In comparison, TFPM.TO has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ASM.TO is priced at CA$4.40, while TFPM.TO trades at CA$31.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.43, whereas TFPM.TO's P/E ratio is 795.75. In terms of profitability, ASM.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TFPM.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ASM.TO is more volatile compared to TFPM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASM.TO.Check TFPM.TO's competition here
ASM.TO vs CGG.TO Comparison July 2025
ASM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM.TO stands at 637M. In comparison, CGG.TO has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ASM.TO is priced at CA$4.40, while CGG.TO trades at CA$11.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.43, whereas CGG.TO's P/E ratio is 19.82. In terms of profitability, ASM.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CGG.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ASM.TO is more volatile compared to CGG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASM.TO.Check CGG.TO's competition here
ASM.TO vs SIL.TO Comparison July 2025
ASM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM.TO stands at 637M. In comparison, SIL.TO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ASM.TO is priced at CA$4.40, while SIL.TO trades at CA$15.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.43, whereas SIL.TO's P/E ratio is 18.30. In terms of profitability, ASM.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SIL.TO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ASM.TO is less volatile compared to SIL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASM.TO.Check SIL.TO's competition here
ASM.TO vs PPTA.TO Comparison July 2025
ASM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM.TO stands at 637M. In comparison, PPTA.TO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ASM.TO is priced at CA$4.40, while PPTA.TO trades at CA$20.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.43, whereas PPTA.TO's P/E ratio is -51.67. In terms of profitability, ASM.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PPTA.TO's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ASM.TO is more volatile compared to PPTA.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASM.TO.Check PPTA.TO's competition here
ASM.TO vs EDR.TO Comparison July 2025
ASM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM.TO stands at 637M. In comparison, EDR.TO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ASM.TO is priced at CA$4.40, while EDR.TO trades at CA$7.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.43, whereas EDR.TO's P/E ratio is -21.29. In terms of profitability, ASM.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EDR.TO's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ASM.TO is more volatile compared to EDR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASM.TO.Check EDR.TO's competition here
ASM.TO vs GMIN.TO Comparison July 2025
ASM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM.TO stands at 637M. In comparison, GMIN.TO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ASM.TO is priced at CA$4.40, while GMIN.TO trades at CA$16.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.43, whereas GMIN.TO's P/E ratio is 22.90. In terms of profitability, ASM.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GMIN.TO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ASM.TO is more volatile compared to GMIN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASM.TO.Check GMIN.TO's competition here
ASM.TO vs ARIS.TO Comparison July 2025
ASM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM.TO stands at 637M. In comparison, ARIS.TO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ASM.TO is priced at CA$4.40, while ARIS.TO trades at CA$9.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.43, whereas ARIS.TO's P/E ratio is 43.18. In terms of profitability, ASM.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ARIS.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ASM.TO is more volatile compared to ARIS.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASM.TO.Check ARIS.TO's competition here
ASM.TO vs GATO.TO Comparison July 2025
ASM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM.TO stands at 637M. In comparison, GATO.TO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ASM.TO is priced at CA$4.40, while GATO.TO trades at CA$21.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.43, whereas GATO.TO's P/E ratio is 32.22. In terms of profitability, ASM.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GATO.TO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ASM.TO is less volatile compared to GATO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASM.TO.Check GATO.TO's competition here
ASM.TO vs SLS.TO Comparison July 2025
ASM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM.TO stands at 637M. In comparison, SLS.TO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ASM.TO is priced at CA$4.40, while SLS.TO trades at CA$6.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.43, whereas SLS.TO's P/E ratio is -9.26. In terms of profitability, ASM.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SLS.TO's ROE of +20.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ASM.TO is more volatile compared to SLS.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASM.TO.Check SLS.TO's competition here
ASM.TO vs ABRA.TO Comparison July 2025
ASM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM.TO stands at 637M. In comparison, ABRA.TO has a market cap of 810M. Regarding current trading prices, ASM.TO is priced at CA$4.40, while ABRA.TO trades at CA$5.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.43, whereas ABRA.TO's P/E ratio is -20.42. In terms of profitability, ASM.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ABRA.TO's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, ASM.TO is more volatile compared to ABRA.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASM.TO.Check ABRA.TO's competition here
ASM.TO vs MUX.TO Comparison July 2025
ASM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM.TO stands at 637M. In comparison, MUX.TO has a market cap of 760.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ASM.TO is priced at CA$4.40, while MUX.TO trades at CA$14.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.43, whereas MUX.TO's P/E ratio is -18.05. In terms of profitability, ASM.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MUX.TO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ASM.TO is more volatile compared to MUX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASM.TO.Check MUX.TO's competition here
ASM.TO vs GGD.TO Comparison July 2025
ASM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM.TO stands at 637M. In comparison, GGD.TO has a market cap of 666.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ASM.TO is priced at CA$4.40, while GGD.TO trades at CA$2.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.43, whereas GGD.TO's P/E ratio is 204.00. In terms of profitability, ASM.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GGD.TO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ASM.TO is more volatile compared to GGD.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASM.TO.Check GGD.TO's competition here
ASM.TO vs NUAG.TO Comparison July 2025
ASM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM.TO stands at 637M. In comparison, NUAG.TO has a market cap of 353.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ASM.TO is priced at CA$4.40, while NUAG.TO trades at CA$2.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.43, whereas NUAG.TO's P/E ratio is -51.50. In terms of profitability, ASM.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NUAG.TO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ASM.TO is less volatile compared to NUAG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASM.TO.Check NUAG.TO's competition here
ASM.TO vs ALLI.NE Comparison July 2025
ASM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM.TO stands at 637M. In comparison, ALLI.NE has a market cap of 276.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ASM.TO is priced at CA$4.40, while ALLI.NE trades at CA$1.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.43, whereas ALLI.NE's P/E ratio is -24.50. In terms of profitability, ASM.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ALLI.NE's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ASM.TO is more volatile compared to ALLI.NE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASM.TO.Check ALLI.NE's competition here
ASM.TO vs HSLV.CN Comparison July 2025
ASM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM.TO stands at 637M. In comparison, HSLV.CN has a market cap of 230.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ASM.TO is priced at CA$4.40, while HSLV.CN trades at CA$2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.43, whereas HSLV.CN's P/E ratio is -73.33. In terms of profitability, ASM.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HSLV.CN's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ASM.TO is more volatile compared to HSLV.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASM.TO.Check HSLV.CN's competition here
ASM.TO vs PTM.TO Comparison July 2025
ASM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM.TO stands at 637M. In comparison, PTM.TO has a market cap of 227.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ASM.TO is priced at CA$4.40, while PTM.TO trades at CA$2.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.43, whereas PTM.TO's P/E ratio is -40.60. In terms of profitability, ASM.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PTM.TO's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ASM.TO is more volatile compared to PTM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASM.TO.Check PTM.TO's competition here
ASM.TO vs VOXR.TO Comparison July 2025
ASM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM.TO stands at 637M. In comparison, VOXR.TO has a market cap of 225.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ASM.TO is priced at CA$4.40, while VOXR.TO trades at CA$4.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.43, whereas VOXR.TO's P/E ratio is -89.00. In terms of profitability, ASM.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VOXR.TO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ASM.TO is more volatile compared to VOXR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASM.TO.Check VOXR.TO's competition here
ASM.TO vs XAM.TO Comparison July 2025
ASM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM.TO stands at 637M. In comparison, XAM.TO has a market cap of 160.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ASM.TO is priced at CA$4.40, while XAM.TO trades at CA$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.43, whereas XAM.TO's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, ASM.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to XAM.TO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ASM.TO is more volatile compared to XAM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASM.TO.Check XAM.TO's competition here
ASM.TO vs LUC.TO Comparison July 2025
ASM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM.TO stands at 637M. In comparison, LUC.TO has a market cap of 106.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ASM.TO is priced at CA$4.40, while LUC.TO trades at CA$0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.43, whereas LUC.TO's P/E ratio is 1.68. In terms of profitability, ASM.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LUC.TO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ASM.TO is more volatile compared to LUC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASM.TO.Check LUC.TO's competition here
ASM.TO vs SM.V Comparison July 2025
ASM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM.TO stands at 637M. In comparison, SM.V has a market cap of 78.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ASM.TO is priced at CA$4.40, while SM.V trades at CA$0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.43, whereas SM.V's P/E ratio is -23.00. In terms of profitability, ASM.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SM.V's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ASM.TO is more volatile compared to SM.V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASM.TO.Check SM.V's competition here
ASM.TO vs ORV.TO Comparison July 2025
ASM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM.TO stands at 637M. In comparison, ORV.TO has a market cap of 77.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ASM.TO is priced at CA$4.40, while ORV.TO trades at CA$0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.43, whereas ORV.TO's P/E ratio is 57.00. In terms of profitability, ASM.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ORV.TO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ASM.TO is more volatile compared to ORV.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASM.TO.Check ORV.TO's competition here
ASM.TO vs ESAU.CN Comparison July 2025
ASM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM.TO stands at 637M. In comparison, ESAU.CN has a market cap of 65.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ASM.TO is priced at CA$4.40, while ESAU.CN trades at CA$0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.43, whereas ESAU.CN's P/E ratio is -6.77. In terms of profitability, ASM.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ESAU.CN's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ASM.TO is less volatile compared to ESAU.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASM.TO.Check ESAU.CN's competition here
ASM.TO vs ELR.TO Comparison July 2025
ASM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM.TO stands at 637M. In comparison, ELR.TO has a market cap of 47.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ASM.TO is priced at CA$4.40, while ELR.TO trades at CA$0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.43, whereas ELR.TO's P/E ratio is -2.14. In terms of profitability, ASM.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ELR.TO's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ASM.TO is more volatile compared to ELR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASM.TO.Check ELR.TO's competition here
ASM.TO vs CUAU.CN Comparison July 2025
ASM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM.TO stands at 637M. In comparison, CUAU.CN has a market cap of 44.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ASM.TO is priced at CA$4.40, while CUAU.CN trades at CA$0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.43, whereas CUAU.CN's P/E ratio is -22.50. In terms of profitability, ASM.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CUAU.CN's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, ASM.TO is more volatile compared to CUAU.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASM.TO.Check CUAU.CN's competition here
ASM.TO vs DMET.NE Comparison July 2025
ASM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM.TO stands at 637M. In comparison, DMET.NE has a market cap of 36.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ASM.TO is priced at CA$4.40, while DMET.NE trades at CA$0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.43, whereas DMET.NE's P/E ratio is -2.68. In terms of profitability, ASM.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DMET.NE's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ASM.TO is more volatile compared to DMET.NE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASM.TO.Check DMET.NE's competition here
ASM.TO vs EMPS.CN Comparison July 2025
ASM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM.TO stands at 637M. In comparison, EMPS.CN has a market cap of 34.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ASM.TO is priced at CA$4.40, while EMPS.CN trades at CA$0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.43, whereas EMPS.CN's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, ASM.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EMPS.CN's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ASM.TO is less volatile compared to EMPS.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASM.TO.Check EMPS.CN's competition here
ASM.TO vs DIAM.TO Comparison July 2025
ASM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM.TO stands at 637M. In comparison, DIAM.TO has a market cap of 31.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ASM.TO is priced at CA$4.40, while DIAM.TO trades at CA$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.43, whereas DIAM.TO's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, ASM.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DIAM.TO's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, ASM.TO is less volatile compared to DIAM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASM.TO.Check DIAM.TO's competition here
ASM.TO vs AUCU.CN Comparison July 2025
ASM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM.TO stands at 637M. In comparison, AUCU.CN has a market cap of 28.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ASM.TO is priced at CA$4.40, while AUCU.CN trades at CA$0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.43, whereas AUCU.CN's P/E ratio is -8.50. In terms of profitability, ASM.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AUCU.CN's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ASM.TO is more volatile compared to AUCU.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASM.TO.Check AUCU.CN's competition here
ASM.TO vs ITKO.CN Comparison July 2025
ASM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM.TO stands at 637M. In comparison, ITKO.CN has a market cap of 27.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ASM.TO is priced at CA$4.40, while ITKO.CN trades at CA$0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.43, whereas ITKO.CN's P/E ratio is -7.50. In terms of profitability, ASM.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ITKO.CN's ROE of -17.38%. Regarding short-term risk, ASM.TO is less volatile compared to ITKO.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASM.TO.Check ITKO.CN's competition here
ASM.TO vs PAU.CN Comparison July 2025
ASM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM.TO stands at 637M. In comparison, PAU.CN has a market cap of 25.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ASM.TO is priced at CA$4.40, while PAU.CN trades at CA$0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.43, whereas PAU.CN's P/E ratio is -18.50. In terms of profitability, ASM.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PAU.CN's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, ASM.TO is more volatile compared to PAU.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASM.TO.Check PAU.CN's competition here
ASM.TO vs NVRO.CN Comparison July 2025
ASM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM.TO stands at 637M. In comparison, NVRO.CN has a market cap of 19.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ASM.TO is priced at CA$4.40, while NVRO.CN trades at CA$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.43, whereas NVRO.CN's P/E ratio is -7.50. In terms of profitability, ASM.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NVRO.CN's ROE of +0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, ASM.TO is more volatile compared to NVRO.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASM.TO.Check NVRO.CN's competition here
ASM.TO vs CLCO.V Comparison July 2025
ASM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM.TO stands at 637M. In comparison, CLCO.V has a market cap of 16.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ASM.TO is priced at CA$4.40, while CLCO.V trades at CA$0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.43, whereas CLCO.V's P/E ratio is -4.10. In terms of profitability, ASM.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CLCO.V's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ASM.TO is more volatile compared to CLCO.V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASM.TO.Check CLCO.V's competition here
ASM.TO vs CUPR.CN Comparison July 2025
ASM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM.TO stands at 637M. In comparison, CUPR.CN has a market cap of 14.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ASM.TO is priced at CA$4.40, while CUPR.CN trades at CA$0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.43, whereas CUPR.CN's P/E ratio is -4.44. In terms of profitability, ASM.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CUPR.CN's ROE of +7.42%. Regarding short-term risk, ASM.TO is less volatile compared to CUPR.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASM.TO.Check CUPR.CN's competition here
ASM.TO vs FTEL.CN Comparison July 2025
ASM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM.TO stands at 637M. In comparison, FTEL.CN has a market cap of 14.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ASM.TO is priced at CA$4.40, while FTEL.CN trades at CA$0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.43, whereas FTEL.CN's P/E ratio is -4.17. In terms of profitability, ASM.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FTEL.CN's ROE of +18.52%. Regarding short-term risk, ASM.TO is more volatile compared to FTEL.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASM.TO.Check FTEL.CN's competition here
ASM.TO vs ATHA.CN Comparison July 2025
ASM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM.TO stands at 637M. In comparison, ATHA.CN has a market cap of 13M. Regarding current trading prices, ASM.TO is priced at CA$4.40, while ATHA.CN trades at CA$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.43, whereas ATHA.CN's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, ASM.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ATHA.CN's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ASM.TO is more volatile compared to ATHA.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASM.TO.Check ATHA.CN's competition here
ASM.TO vs AUAG.CN Comparison July 2025
ASM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM.TO stands at 637M. In comparison, AUAG.CN has a market cap of 11.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ASM.TO is priced at CA$4.40, while AUAG.CN trades at CA$0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.43, whereas AUAG.CN's P/E ratio is 1.28. In terms of profitability, ASM.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AUAG.CN's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, ASM.TO is more volatile compared to AUAG.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASM.TO.Check AUAG.CN's competition here
ASM.TO vs CAM.V Comparison July 2025
ASM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM.TO stands at 637M. In comparison, CAM.V has a market cap of 11.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ASM.TO is priced at CA$4.40, while CAM.V trades at CA$0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.43, whereas CAM.V's P/E ratio is -1.45. In terms of profitability, ASM.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CAM.V's ROE of -1.78%. Regarding short-term risk, ASM.TO is more volatile compared to CAM.V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASM.TO.Check CAM.V's competition here
ASM.TO vs MPVD.TO Comparison July 2025
ASM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM.TO stands at 637M. In comparison, MPVD.TO has a market cap of 10.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ASM.TO is priced at CA$4.40, while MPVD.TO trades at CA$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.43, whereas MPVD.TO's P/E ratio is 0.26. In terms of profitability, ASM.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MPVD.TO's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, ASM.TO is more volatile compared to MPVD.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASM.TO.Check MPVD.TO's competition here
ASM.TO vs IGLD.CN Comparison July 2025
ASM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM.TO stands at 637M. In comparison, IGLD.CN has a market cap of 8.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ASM.TO is priced at CA$4.40, while IGLD.CN trades at CA$0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.43, whereas IGLD.CN's P/E ratio is -1.38. In terms of profitability, ASM.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IGLD.CN's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ASM.TO has daily volatility of 8.18 and IGLD.CN has daily volatility of N/A.Check IGLD.CN's competition here
ASM.TO vs SIZE.NE Comparison July 2025
ASM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM.TO stands at 637M. In comparison, SIZE.NE has a market cap of 7.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ASM.TO is priced at CA$4.40, while SIZE.NE trades at CA$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.43, whereas SIZE.NE's P/E ratio is -0.32. In terms of profitability, ASM.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SIZE.NE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ASM.TO is less volatile compared to SIZE.NE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASM.TO.Check SIZE.NE's competition here
ASM.TO vs ACDX.CN Comparison July 2025
ASM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM.TO stands at 637M. In comparison, ACDX.CN has a market cap of 7.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ASM.TO is priced at CA$4.40, while ACDX.CN trades at CA$0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.43, whereas ACDX.CN's P/E ratio is -0.41. In terms of profitability, ASM.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ACDX.CN's ROE of -2.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ASM.TO is more volatile compared to ACDX.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASM.TO.Check ACDX.CN's competition here
ASM.TO vs LECR.CN Comparison July 2025
ASM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM.TO stands at 637M. In comparison, LECR.CN has a market cap of 6.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ASM.TO is priced at CA$4.40, while LECR.CN trades at CA$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.43, whereas LECR.CN's P/E ratio is -1.37. In terms of profitability, ASM.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LECR.CN's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, ASM.TO is more volatile compared to LECR.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASM.TO.Check LECR.CN's competition here
ASM.TO vs CFE.CN Comparison July 2025
ASM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM.TO stands at 637M. In comparison, CFE.CN has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ASM.TO is priced at CA$4.40, while CFE.CN trades at CA$0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.43, whereas CFE.CN's P/E ratio is -2.40. In terms of profitability, ASM.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CFE.CN's ROE of -1.48%. Regarding short-term risk, ASM.TO is more volatile compared to CFE.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASM.TO.Check CFE.CN's competition here
ASM.TO vs AUMN.TO Comparison July 2025
ASM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM.TO stands at 637M. In comparison, AUMN.TO has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ASM.TO is priced at CA$4.40, while AUMN.TO trades at CA$0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.43, whereas AUMN.TO's P/E ratio is -0.95. In terms of profitability, ASM.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AUMN.TO's ROE of +3.34%. Regarding short-term risk, ASM.TO is less volatile compared to AUMN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASM.TO.Check AUMN.TO's competition here
ASM.TO vs HML.CN Comparison July 2025
ASM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM.TO stands at 637M. In comparison, HML.CN has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, ASM.TO is priced at CA$4.40, while HML.CN trades at CA$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.43, whereas HML.CN's P/E ratio is -0.88. In terms of profitability, ASM.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HML.CN's ROE of -24.98%. Regarding short-term risk, ASM.TO is less volatile compared to HML.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASM.TO.Check HML.CN's competition here
ASM.TO vs MLKM.CN Comparison July 2025
ASM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM.TO stands at 637M. In comparison, MLKM.CN has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ASM.TO is priced at CA$4.40, while MLKM.CN trades at CA$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.43, whereas MLKM.CN's P/E ratio is -3.50. In terms of profitability, ASM.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MLKM.CN's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ASM.TO is more volatile compared to MLKM.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASM.TO.Check MLKM.CN's competition here
ASM.TO vs WDGY.CN Comparison July 2025
ASM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM.TO stands at 637M. In comparison, WDGY.CN has a market cap of 3.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ASM.TO is priced at CA$4.40, while WDGY.CN trades at CA$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.43, whereas WDGY.CN's P/E ratio is -0.92. In terms of profitability, ASM.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WDGY.CN's ROE of -2.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ASM.TO is more volatile compared to WDGY.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASM.TO.Check WDGY.CN's competition here
ASM.TO vs LTHM.CN Comparison July 2025
ASM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM.TO stands at 637M. In comparison, LTHM.CN has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ASM.TO is priced at CA$4.40, while LTHM.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.43, whereas LTHM.CN's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, ASM.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LTHM.CN's ROE of +1.88%. Regarding short-term risk, ASM.TO is less volatile compared to LTHM.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASM.TO.Check LTHM.CN's competition here
ASM.TO vs ORGN.CN Comparison July 2025
ASM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM.TO stands at 637M. In comparison, ORGN.CN has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ASM.TO is priced at CA$4.40, while ORGN.CN trades at CA$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.43, whereas ORGN.CN's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, ASM.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ORGN.CN's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, ASM.TO is more volatile compared to ORGN.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASM.TO.Check ORGN.CN's competition here
ASM.TO vs CRC.CN Comparison July 2025
ASM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM.TO stands at 637M. In comparison, CRC.CN has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ASM.TO is priced at CA$4.40, while CRC.CN trades at CA$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.43, whereas CRC.CN's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, ASM.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CRC.CN's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ASM.TO is less volatile compared to CRC.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASM.TO.Check CRC.CN's competition here
ASM.TO vs TAI.CN Comparison July 2025
ASM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM.TO stands at 637M. In comparison, TAI.CN has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ASM.TO is priced at CA$4.40, while TAI.CN trades at CA$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.43, whereas TAI.CN's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, ASM.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TAI.CN's ROE of -3.84%. Regarding short-term risk, ASM.TO is less volatile compared to TAI.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASM.TO.Check TAI.CN's competition here
ASM.TO vs PMS.CN Comparison July 2025
ASM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM.TO stands at 637M. In comparison, PMS.CN has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ASM.TO is priced at CA$4.40, while PMS.CN trades at CA$0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.43, whereas PMS.CN's P/E ratio is -11.67. In terms of profitability, ASM.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PMS.CN's ROE of +3.90%. Regarding short-term risk, ASM.TO is more volatile compared to PMS.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASM.TO.Check PMS.CN's competition here
ASM.TO vs PNGC.CN Comparison July 2025
ASM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM.TO stands at 637M. In comparison, PNGC.CN has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ASM.TO is priced at CA$4.40, while PNGC.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.43, whereas PNGC.CN's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, ASM.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PNGC.CN's ROE of +1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ASM.TO is more volatile compared to PNGC.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASM.TO.Check PNGC.CN's competition here
ASM.TO vs GLDS.CN Comparison July 2025
ASM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM.TO stands at 637M. In comparison, GLDS.CN has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ASM.TO is priced at CA$4.40, while GLDS.CN trades at CA$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.43, whereas GLDS.CN's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, ASM.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GLDS.CN's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ASM.TO is more volatile compared to GLDS.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASM.TO.Check GLDS.CN's competition here
ASM.TO vs TGLD.CN Comparison July 2025
ASM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM.TO stands at 637M. In comparison, TGLD.CN has a market cap of 943.4K. Regarding current trading prices, ASM.TO is priced at CA$4.40, while TGLD.CN trades at CA$0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.43, whereas TGLD.CN's P/E ratio is -2.24. In terms of profitability, ASM.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TGLD.CN's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, ASM.TO is more volatile compared to TGLD.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASM.TO.Check TGLD.CN's competition here
ASM.TO vs FABL.CN Comparison July 2025
ASM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM.TO stands at 637M. In comparison, FABL.CN has a market cap of 869.8K. Regarding current trading prices, ASM.TO is priced at CA$4.40, while FABL.CN trades at CA$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.43, whereas FABL.CN's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, ASM.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FABL.CN's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, ASM.TO is more volatile compared to FABL.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASM.TO.Check FABL.CN's competition here
ASM.TO vs TAUR.CN Comparison July 2025
ASM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM.TO stands at 637M. In comparison, TAUR.CN has a market cap of 754.4K. Regarding current trading prices, ASM.TO is priced at CA$4.40, while TAUR.CN trades at CA$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.43, whereas TAUR.CN's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, ASM.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TAUR.CN's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ASM.TO is more volatile compared to TAUR.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASM.TO.Check TAUR.CN's competition here
ASM.TO vs NVR.CN Comparison July 2025
ASM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM.TO stands at 637M. In comparison, NVR.CN has a market cap of 719.3K. Regarding current trading prices, ASM.TO is priced at CA$4.40, while NVR.CN trades at CA$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.43, whereas NVR.CN's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, ASM.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NVR.CN's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, ASM.TO is more volatile compared to NVR.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASM.TO.Check NVR.CN's competition here
ASM.TO vs SAND.CN Comparison July 2025
ASM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM.TO stands at 637M. In comparison, SAND.CN has a market cap of 649.8K. Regarding current trading prices, ASM.TO is priced at CA$4.40, while SAND.CN trades at CA$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.43, whereas SAND.CN's P/E ratio is -4.50. In terms of profitability, ASM.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SAND.CN's ROE of +286.91%. Regarding short-term risk, ASM.TO is more volatile compared to SAND.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASM.TO.Check SAND.CN's competition here
ASM.TO vs AGE.CN Comparison July 2025
ASM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM.TO stands at 637M. In comparison, AGE.CN has a market cap of 327.4K. Regarding current trading prices, ASM.TO is priced at CA$4.40, while AGE.CN trades at CA$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.43, whereas AGE.CN's P/E ratio is -1.25. In terms of profitability, ASM.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AGE.CN's ROE of -1.63%. Regarding short-term risk, ASM.TO is more volatile compared to AGE.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASM.TO.Check AGE.CN's competition here
ASM.TO vs MUSK.CN Comparison July 2025
ASM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM.TO stands at 637M. In comparison, MUSK.CN has a market cap of 76.3K. Regarding current trading prices, ASM.TO is priced at CA$4.40, while MUSK.CN trades at CA$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.43, whereas MUSK.CN's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, ASM.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MUSK.CN's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, ASM.TO is less volatile compared to MUSK.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASM.TO.Check MUSK.CN's competition here
ASM.TO vs MMX.TO Comparison July 2025
ASM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM.TO stands at 637M. In comparison, MMX.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ASM.TO is priced at CA$4.40, while MMX.TO trades at CA$6.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.43, whereas MMX.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ASM.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MMX.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ASM.TO is more volatile compared to MMX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASM.TO.Check MMX.TO's competition here
ASM.TO vs XGC.TO Comparison July 2025
ASM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM.TO stands at 637M. In comparison, XGC.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ASM.TO is priced at CA$4.40, while XGC.TO trades at CA$30.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.43, whereas XGC.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ASM.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to XGC.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ASM.TO is more volatile compared to XGC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASM.TO.Check XGC.TO's competition here
ASM.TO vs FOXY.CN Comparison July 2025
ASM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM.TO stands at 637M. In comparison, FOXY.CN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ASM.TO is priced at CA$4.40, while FOXY.CN trades at CA$0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.43, whereas FOXY.CN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ASM.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FOXY.CN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ASM.TO is less volatile compared to FOXY.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASM.TO.Check FOXY.CN's competition here
ASM.TO vs AXU.TO Comparison July 2025
ASM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM.TO stands at 637M. In comparison, AXU.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ASM.TO is priced at CA$4.40, while AXU.TO trades at CA$0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.43, whereas AXU.TO's P/E ratio is -5.24. In terms of profitability, ASM.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AXU.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ASM.TO is more volatile compared to AXU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASM.TO.Check AXU.TO's competition here
ASM.TO vs PFB.TO Comparison July 2025
ASM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM.TO stands at 637M. In comparison, PFB.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ASM.TO is priced at CA$4.40, while PFB.TO trades at CA$24.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.43, whereas PFB.TO's P/E ratio is 11.02. In terms of profitability, ASM.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PFB.TO's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ASM.TO is more volatile compared to PFB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASM.TO.Check PFB.TO's competition here
ASM.TO vs GCM.TO Comparison July 2025
ASM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM.TO stands at 637M. In comparison, GCM.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ASM.TO is priced at CA$4.40, while GCM.TO trades at CA$3.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.43, whereas GCM.TO's P/E ratio is 6.35. In terms of profitability, ASM.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GCM.TO's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, ASM.TO is more volatile compared to GCM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASM.TO.Check GCM.TO's competition here
ASM.TO vs NSR.TO Comparison July 2025
ASM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM.TO stands at 637M. In comparison, NSR.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ASM.TO is priced at CA$4.40, while NSR.TO trades at CA$9.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.43, whereas NSR.TO's P/E ratio is 967.00. In terms of profitability, ASM.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NSR.TO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ASM.TO is more volatile compared to NSR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASM.TO.Check NSR.TO's competition here