American Crystal Sugar Company PFD REST NON DIV
American Crystal Sugar Company PFD REST NON DIV ASCS Peers
See (ASCS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Food Confectioners Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASCS | $5,500.00 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| COCXF | $110,001.20 | +759.38% | 410.68B | 31.24 | $3,520.70 | +1.63% |
| LDSVF | $14,950.00 | +1.70% | 33.97B | 43.67 | $342.36 | +1.44% |
| CHLSY | $14.81 | +2.28% | 14.44B | 43.56 | $0.34 | +0.66% |
| BRRLY | $8.84 | -2.46% | 4.84B | 28.51 | $0.31 | +3.59% |
| BYCBF | $876.00 | N/A | 4.80B | 28.09 | $31.19 | +3.64% |
| MGAAF | $15.51 | N/A | 1.33B | 20.96 | $0.74 | +0.02% |
| UELKY | $26.23 | N/A | 968.61M | 5.08 | $5.16 | N/A |
| CLOEF | $2.40 | N/A | 672.79M | 16.00 | $0.15 | +4.65% |
| HCHOF | $4.68 | +4.00% | 658.94M | -78.00 | -$0.06 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
ASCS vs COCXF Comparison
ASCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASCS stands at N/A. In comparison, COCXF has a market cap of 410.68B. Regarding current trading prices, ASCS is priced at $5,500.00, while COCXF trades at $110,001.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASCS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COCXF's P/E ratio is 31.24. In terms of profitability, ASCS's ROE is N/A, compared to COCXF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ASCS is less volatile compared to COCXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASCS.
ASCS vs LDSVF Comparison
ASCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASCS stands at N/A. In comparison, LDSVF has a market cap of 33.97B. Regarding current trading prices, ASCS is priced at $5,500.00, while LDSVF trades at $14,950.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASCS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LDSVF's P/E ratio is 43.67. In terms of profitability, ASCS's ROE is N/A, compared to LDSVF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ASCS and LDSVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ASCS vs CHLSY Comparison
ASCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASCS stands at N/A. In comparison, CHLSY has a market cap of 14.44B. Regarding current trading prices, ASCS is priced at $5,500.00, while CHLSY trades at $14.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASCS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHLSY's P/E ratio is 43.56. In terms of profitability, ASCS's ROE is N/A, compared to CHLSY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ASCS is less volatile compared to CHLSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASCS.
ASCS vs BRRLY Comparison
ASCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASCS stands at N/A. In comparison, BRRLY has a market cap of 4.84B. Regarding current trading prices, ASCS is priced at $5,500.00, while BRRLY trades at $8.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASCS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BRRLY's P/E ratio is 28.51. In terms of profitability, ASCS's ROE is N/A, compared to BRRLY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ASCS is less volatile compared to BRRLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASCS.
ASCS vs BYCBF Comparison
ASCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASCS stands at N/A. In comparison, BYCBF has a market cap of 4.80B. Regarding current trading prices, ASCS is priced at $5,500.00, while BYCBF trades at $876.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASCS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BYCBF's P/E ratio is 28.09. In terms of profitability, ASCS's ROE is N/A, compared to BYCBF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ASCS is less volatile compared to BYCBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASCS.
ASCS vs MGAAF Comparison
ASCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASCS stands at N/A. In comparison, MGAAF has a market cap of 1.33B. Regarding current trading prices, ASCS is priced at $5,500.00, while MGAAF trades at $15.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASCS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MGAAF's P/E ratio is 20.96. In terms of profitability, ASCS's ROE is N/A, compared to MGAAF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ASCS is less volatile compared to MGAAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASCS.
ASCS vs UELKY Comparison
ASCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASCS stands at N/A. In comparison, UELKY has a market cap of 968.61M. Regarding current trading prices, ASCS is priced at $5,500.00, while UELKY trades at $26.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASCS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UELKY's P/E ratio is 5.08. In terms of profitability, ASCS's ROE is N/A, compared to UELKY's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ASCS is less volatile compared to UELKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASCS.
ASCS vs CLOEF Comparison
ASCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASCS stands at N/A. In comparison, CLOEF has a market cap of 672.79M. Regarding current trading prices, ASCS is priced at $5,500.00, while CLOEF trades at $2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASCS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLOEF's P/E ratio is 16.00. In terms of profitability, ASCS's ROE is N/A, compared to CLOEF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ASCS is less volatile compared to CLOEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASCS.
ASCS vs HCHOF Comparison
ASCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASCS stands at N/A. In comparison, HCHOF has a market cap of 658.94M. Regarding current trading prices, ASCS is priced at $5,500.00, while HCHOF trades at $4.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASCS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HCHOF's P/E ratio is -78.00. In terms of profitability, ASCS's ROE is N/A, compared to HCHOF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ASCS and HCHOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ASCS vs RSGUF Comparison
ASCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASCS stands at N/A. In comparison, RSGUF has a market cap of 510.99M. Regarding current trading prices, ASCS is priced at $5,500.00, while RSGUF trades at $3.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASCS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RSGUF's P/E ratio is 13.76. In terms of profitability, ASCS's ROE is N/A, compared to RSGUF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ASCS is less volatile compared to RSGUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASCS.
ASCS vs PEFDF Comparison
ASCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASCS stands at N/A. In comparison, PEFDF has a market cap of 354.47M. Regarding current trading prices, ASCS is priced at $5,500.00, while PEFDF trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASCS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PEFDF's P/E ratio is 9.67. In terms of profitability, ASCS's ROE is N/A, compared to PEFDF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ASCS is less volatile compared to PEFDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASCS.
ASCS vs QQFSF Comparison
ASCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASCS stands at N/A. In comparison, QQFSF has a market cap of 117.97M. Regarding current trading prices, ASCS is priced at $5,500.00, while QQFSF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASCS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QQFSF's P/E ratio is -3.75. In terms of profitability, ASCS's ROE is N/A, compared to QQFSF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ASCS is less volatile compared to QQFSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASCS.
ASCS vs FVGCF Comparison
ASCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASCS stands at N/A. In comparison, FVGCF has a market cap of 5.49M. Regarding current trading prices, ASCS is priced at $5,500.00, while FVGCF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASCS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FVGCF's P/E ratio is -3.73. In terms of profitability, ASCS's ROE is N/A, compared to FVGCF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ASCS and FVGCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ASCS vs RLGDF Comparison
ASCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASCS stands at N/A. In comparison, RLGDF has a market cap of 2.64M. Regarding current trading prices, ASCS is priced at $5,500.00, while RLGDF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASCS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RLGDF's P/E ratio is 0.21. In terms of profitability, ASCS's ROE is N/A, compared to RLGDF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ASCS and RLGDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ASCS vs YWGRF Comparison
ASCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASCS stands at N/A. In comparison, YWGRF has a market cap of 2.29M. Regarding current trading prices, ASCS is priced at $5,500.00, while YWGRF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASCS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YWGRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ASCS's ROE is N/A, compared to YWGRF's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, ASCS and YWGRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ASCS vs GUMYF Comparison
ASCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASCS stands at N/A. In comparison, GUMYF has a market cap of 654860.00. Regarding current trading prices, ASCS is priced at $5,500.00, while GUMYF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASCS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GUMYF's P/E ratio is -0.52. In terms of profitability, ASCS's ROE is N/A, compared to GUMYF's ROE of -2.87%. Regarding short-term risk, ASCS and GUMYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ASCS vs GNGR Comparison
ASCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASCS stands at N/A. In comparison, GNGR has a market cap of 109381.00. Regarding current trading prices, ASCS is priced at $5,500.00, while GNGR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASCS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GNGR's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, ASCS's ROE is N/A, compared to GNGR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ASCS and GNGR have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ASCS vs EVRN Comparison
ASCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASCS stands at N/A. In comparison, EVRN has a market cap of 32008.00. Regarding current trading prices, ASCS is priced at $5,500.00, while EVRN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASCS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EVRN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ASCS's ROE is N/A, compared to EVRN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ASCS and EVRN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ASCS vs HWVI Comparison
ASCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASCS stands at N/A. In comparison, HWVI has a market cap of 11455.00. Regarding current trading prices, ASCS is priced at $5,500.00, while HWVI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASCS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HWVI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ASCS's ROE is N/A, compared to HWVI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ASCS and HWVI have similar daily volatility (0.00).