Altius Renewable Royalties Corp.
Altius Renewable Royalties Corp. ARR.TO Peers
See (ARR.TO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Renewable Utilities Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ARR.TO | CA$12.00 | N/A | 370.5M | -400.00 | -CA$0.03 | N/A |
| BEP-PK.TO | CA$25.00 | N/A | 16.2B | -37.82 | -CA$0.66 | N/A |
| BEP-PM.TO | CA$24.55 | +0.41% | 16.1B | -37.14 | -CA$0.66 | +8.44% |
| BEP-UN.TO | CA$32.86 | +0.92% | 9.7B | -24.52 | -CA$1.34 | +6.10% |
| AQN.TO | CA$8.02 | +0.38% | 6.2B | 21.11 | CA$0.38 | +5.28% |
| BEPC.TO | CA$40.55 | +0.32% | 6.1B | -21.23 | -CA$1.91 | +5.02% |
| NPI.TO | CA$20.75 | -0.10% | 5.4B | 20.96 | CA$0.99 | +5.79% |
| RNW.TO | CA$12.48 | +1.13% | 3.3B | 41.60 | CA$0.30 | N/A |
| BLX.TO | CA$31.84 | -0.50% | 3.3B | 289.45 | CA$0.11 | +2.06% |
| INE.TO | CA$13.73 | +0.15% | 2.8B | 72.26 | CA$0.19 | +2.63% |
Stock Comparison
ARR.TO vs BEP-PK.TO Comparison
ARR.TO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARR.TO stands at 370.5M. In comparison, BEP-PK.TO has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ARR.TO is priced at CA$12.00, while BEP-PK.TO trades at CA$25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -400.00, whereas BEP-PK.TO's P/E ratio is -37.82. In terms of profitability, ARR.TO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to BEP-PK.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ARR.TO and BEP-PK.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ARR.TO vs BEP-PM.TO Comparison
ARR.TO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARR.TO stands at 370.5M. In comparison, BEP-PM.TO has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ARR.TO is priced at CA$12.00, while BEP-PM.TO trades at CA$24.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -400.00, whereas BEP-PM.TO's P/E ratio is -37.14. In terms of profitability, ARR.TO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to BEP-PM.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ARR.TO is less volatile compared to BEP-PM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARR.TO.
ARR.TO vs BEP-UN.TO Comparison
ARR.TO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARR.TO stands at 370.5M. In comparison, BEP-UN.TO has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ARR.TO is priced at CA$12.00, while BEP-UN.TO trades at CA$32.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -400.00, whereas BEP-UN.TO's P/E ratio is -24.52. In terms of profitability, ARR.TO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to BEP-UN.TO's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ARR.TO is less volatile compared to BEP-UN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARR.TO.
ARR.TO vs AQN.TO Comparison
ARR.TO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARR.TO stands at 370.5M. In comparison, AQN.TO has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ARR.TO is priced at CA$12.00, while AQN.TO trades at CA$8.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -400.00, whereas AQN.TO's P/E ratio is 21.11. In terms of profitability, ARR.TO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to AQN.TO's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ARR.TO is less volatile compared to AQN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARR.TO.
ARR.TO vs BEPC.TO Comparison
ARR.TO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARR.TO stands at 370.5M. In comparison, BEPC.TO has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ARR.TO is priced at CA$12.00, while BEPC.TO trades at CA$40.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -400.00, whereas BEPC.TO's P/E ratio is -21.23. In terms of profitability, ARR.TO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to BEPC.TO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ARR.TO is less volatile compared to BEPC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARR.TO.
ARR.TO vs NPI.TO Comparison
ARR.TO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARR.TO stands at 370.5M. In comparison, NPI.TO has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ARR.TO is priced at CA$12.00, while NPI.TO trades at CA$20.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -400.00, whereas NPI.TO's P/E ratio is 20.96. In terms of profitability, ARR.TO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to NPI.TO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ARR.TO is less volatile compared to NPI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARR.TO.
ARR.TO vs RNW.TO Comparison
ARR.TO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARR.TO stands at 370.5M. In comparison, RNW.TO has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ARR.TO is priced at CA$12.00, while RNW.TO trades at CA$12.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -400.00, whereas RNW.TO's P/E ratio is 41.60. In terms of profitability, ARR.TO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to RNW.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ARR.TO is less volatile compared to RNW.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARR.TO.
ARR.TO vs BLX.TO Comparison
ARR.TO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARR.TO stands at 370.5M. In comparison, BLX.TO has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ARR.TO is priced at CA$12.00, while BLX.TO trades at CA$31.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -400.00, whereas BLX.TO's P/E ratio is 289.45. In terms of profitability, ARR.TO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to BLX.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ARR.TO is less volatile compared to BLX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARR.TO.
ARR.TO vs INE.TO Comparison
ARR.TO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARR.TO stands at 370.5M. In comparison, INE.TO has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ARR.TO is priced at CA$12.00, while INE.TO trades at CA$13.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -400.00, whereas INE.TO's P/E ratio is 72.26. In terms of profitability, ARR.TO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to INE.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ARR.TO is less volatile compared to INE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARR.TO.
ARR.TO vs PIF.TO Comparison
ARR.TO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARR.TO stands at 370.5M. In comparison, PIF.TO has a market cap of 248.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ARR.TO is priced at CA$12.00, while PIF.TO trades at CA$11.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -400.00, whereas PIF.TO's P/E ratio is -15.53. In terms of profitability, ARR.TO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to PIF.TO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ARR.TO is less volatile compared to PIF.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARR.TO.
ARR.TO vs LCFS.TO Comparison
ARR.TO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARR.TO stands at 370.5M. In comparison, LCFS.TO has a market cap of 86.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ARR.TO is priced at CA$12.00, while LCFS.TO trades at CA$2.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -400.00, whereas LCFS.TO's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, ARR.TO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to LCFS.TO's ROE of -1.47%. Regarding short-term risk, ARR.TO is less volatile compared to LCFS.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARR.TO.
ARR.TO vs SPG.TO Comparison
ARR.TO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARR.TO stands at 370.5M. In comparison, SPG.TO has a market cap of 74.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ARR.TO is priced at CA$12.00, while SPG.TO trades at CA$0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -400.00, whereas SPG.TO's P/E ratio is -4.56. In terms of profitability, ARR.TO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SPG.TO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ARR.TO and SPG.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ARR.TO vs SXI.TO Comparison
ARR.TO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARR.TO stands at 370.5M. In comparison, SXI.TO has a market cap of 11.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ARR.TO is priced at CA$12.00, while SXI.TO trades at CA$2.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -400.00, whereas SXI.TO's P/E ratio is -12.42. In terms of profitability, ARR.TO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SXI.TO's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ARR.TO and SXI.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ARR.TO vs MOVE.NE Comparison
ARR.TO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARR.TO stands at 370.5M. In comparison, MOVE.NE has a market cap of 9M. Regarding current trading prices, ARR.TO is priced at CA$12.00, while MOVE.NE trades at CA$0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -400.00, whereas MOVE.NE's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, ARR.TO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to MOVE.NE's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, ARR.TO is less volatile compared to MOVE.NE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARR.TO.
ARR.TO vs ETX.TO Comparison
ARR.TO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARR.TO stands at 370.5M. In comparison, ETX.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ARR.TO is priced at CA$12.00, while ETX.TO trades at CA$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -400.00, whereas ETX.TO's P/E ratio is 0.52. In terms of profitability, ARR.TO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ETX.TO's ROE of +2.45%. Regarding short-term risk, ARR.TO is less volatile compared to ETX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARR.TO.