Altius Renewable Royalties Corp.
Altius Renewable Royalties Corp. ARR.TO Peers
See (ARR.TO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Renewable Utilities Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ARR.TO | $12.00 | N/A | 370.53M | -400.00 | -$0.03 | N/A |
| BEP-PK.TO | $25.00 | N/A | 16.16B | -37.82 | -$0.66 | N/A |
| BEP-PM.TO | $22.99 | -0.65% | 15.10B | -34.78 | -$0.66 | +9.19% |
| BEP-UN.TO | $33.10 | -0.96% | 9.40B | -23.48 | -$1.41 | +8.45% |
| BEPC.TO | $40.94 | -0.12% | 5.93B | -21.10 | -$1.94 | +4.87% |
| AQN.TO | $7.62 | -2.43% | 5.85B | 19.54 | $0.39 | +7.78% |
| NPI.TO | $19.94 | +1.01% | 5.20B | 19.36 | $1.03 | +6.03% |
| RNW.TO | $12.48 | +1.13% | 3.33B | 41.60 | $0.30 | N/A |
| BLX.TO | $30.59 | -3.07% | 3.14B | 87.40 | $0.35 | +2.17% |
| INE.TO | $13.62 | +0.07% | 2.77B | 71.68 | $0.19 | +2.65% |
Stock Comparison
ARR.TO vs BEP-PK.TO Comparison
ARR.TO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARR.TO stands at 370.53M. In comparison, BEP-PK.TO has a market cap of 16.16B. Regarding current trading prices, ARR.TO is priced at $12.00, while BEP-PK.TO trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -400.00, whereas BEP-PK.TO's P/E ratio is -37.82. In terms of profitability, ARR.TO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to BEP-PK.TO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ARR.TO and BEP-PK.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ARR.TO vs BEP-PM.TO Comparison
ARR.TO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARR.TO stands at 370.53M. In comparison, BEP-PM.TO has a market cap of 15.10B. Regarding current trading prices, ARR.TO is priced at $12.00, while BEP-PM.TO trades at $22.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -400.00, whereas BEP-PM.TO's P/E ratio is -34.78. In terms of profitability, ARR.TO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to BEP-PM.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ARR.TO and BEP-PM.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ARR.TO vs BEP-UN.TO Comparison
ARR.TO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARR.TO stands at 370.53M. In comparison, BEP-UN.TO has a market cap of 9.40B. Regarding current trading prices, ARR.TO is priced at $12.00, while BEP-UN.TO trades at $33.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -400.00, whereas BEP-UN.TO's P/E ratio is -23.48. In terms of profitability, ARR.TO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to BEP-UN.TO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ARR.TO is less volatile compared to BEP-UN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARR.TO.
ARR.TO vs BEPC.TO Comparison
ARR.TO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARR.TO stands at 370.53M. In comparison, BEPC.TO has a market cap of 5.93B. Regarding current trading prices, ARR.TO is priced at $12.00, while BEPC.TO trades at $40.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -400.00, whereas BEPC.TO's P/E ratio is -21.10. In terms of profitability, ARR.TO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to BEPC.TO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ARR.TO is less volatile compared to BEPC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARR.TO.
ARR.TO vs AQN.TO Comparison
ARR.TO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARR.TO stands at 370.53M. In comparison, AQN.TO has a market cap of 5.85B. Regarding current trading prices, ARR.TO is priced at $12.00, while AQN.TO trades at $7.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -400.00, whereas AQN.TO's P/E ratio is 19.54. In terms of profitability, ARR.TO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to AQN.TO's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ARR.TO is less volatile compared to AQN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARR.TO.
ARR.TO vs NPI.TO Comparison
ARR.TO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARR.TO stands at 370.53M. In comparison, NPI.TO has a market cap of 5.20B. Regarding current trading prices, ARR.TO is priced at $12.00, while NPI.TO trades at $19.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -400.00, whereas NPI.TO's P/E ratio is 19.36. In terms of profitability, ARR.TO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to NPI.TO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ARR.TO is less volatile compared to NPI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARR.TO.
ARR.TO vs RNW.TO Comparison
ARR.TO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARR.TO stands at 370.53M. In comparison, RNW.TO has a market cap of 3.33B. Regarding current trading prices, ARR.TO is priced at $12.00, while RNW.TO trades at $12.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -400.00, whereas RNW.TO's P/E ratio is 41.60. In terms of profitability, ARR.TO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to RNW.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ARR.TO is less volatile compared to RNW.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARR.TO.
ARR.TO vs BLX.TO Comparison
ARR.TO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARR.TO stands at 370.53M. In comparison, BLX.TO has a market cap of 3.14B. Regarding current trading prices, ARR.TO is priced at $12.00, while BLX.TO trades at $30.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -400.00, whereas BLX.TO's P/E ratio is 87.40. In terms of profitability, ARR.TO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to BLX.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ARR.TO is less volatile compared to BLX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARR.TO.
ARR.TO vs INE.TO Comparison
ARR.TO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARR.TO stands at 370.53M. In comparison, INE.TO has a market cap of 2.77B. Regarding current trading prices, ARR.TO is priced at $12.00, while INE.TO trades at $13.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -400.00, whereas INE.TO's P/E ratio is 71.68. In terms of profitability, ARR.TO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to INE.TO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ARR.TO is less volatile compared to INE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARR.TO.
ARR.TO vs PIF.TO Comparison
ARR.TO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARR.TO stands at 370.53M. In comparison, PIF.TO has a market cap of 247.10M. Regarding current trading prices, ARR.TO is priced at $12.00, while PIF.TO trades at $11.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -400.00, whereas PIF.TO's P/E ratio is -15.04. In terms of profitability, ARR.TO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to PIF.TO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ARR.TO is less volatile compared to PIF.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARR.TO.
ARR.TO vs LCFS.TO Comparison
ARR.TO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARR.TO stands at 370.53M. In comparison, LCFS.TO has a market cap of 95.71M. Regarding current trading prices, ARR.TO is priced at $12.00, while LCFS.TO trades at $2.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -400.00, whereas LCFS.TO's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, ARR.TO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to LCFS.TO's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ARR.TO is less volatile compared to LCFS.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARR.TO.
ARR.TO vs SPG.TO Comparison
ARR.TO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARR.TO stands at 370.53M. In comparison, SPG.TO has a market cap of 74.48M. Regarding current trading prices, ARR.TO is priced at $12.00, while SPG.TO trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -400.00, whereas SPG.TO's P/E ratio is -4.56. In terms of profitability, ARR.TO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SPG.TO's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ARR.TO and SPG.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ARR.TO vs SXI.TO Comparison
ARR.TO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARR.TO stands at 370.53M. In comparison, SXI.TO has a market cap of 11.57M. Regarding current trading prices, ARR.TO is priced at $12.00, while SXI.TO trades at $2.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -400.00, whereas SXI.TO's P/E ratio is -15.40. In terms of profitability, ARR.TO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SXI.TO's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ARR.TO and SXI.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ARR.TO vs MOVE.NE Comparison
ARR.TO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARR.TO stands at 370.53M. In comparison, MOVE.NE has a market cap of 9.05M. Regarding current trading prices, ARR.TO is priced at $12.00, while MOVE.NE trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -400.00, whereas MOVE.NE's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, ARR.TO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to MOVE.NE's ROE of +3.42%. Regarding short-term risk, ARR.TO is less volatile compared to MOVE.NE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARR.TO.