Ares Management Corporation

ARES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARES stands at 37.1B. In comparison, VSMPX has a market cap of 2T. Regarding current trading prices, ARES is priced at $113.01, while VSMPX trades at $320.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARES currently has a P/E ratio of 65.69, whereas VSMPX's P/E ratio is 27.56. In terms of profitability, ARES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VSMPX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ARES is more volatile compared to VSMPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARES.Check VSMPX's competition here

ARES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARES stands at 37.1B. In comparison, VTSAX has a market cap of 2T. Regarding current trading prices, ARES is priced at $113.01, while VTSAX trades at $170.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARES currently has a P/E ratio of 65.69, whereas VTSAX's P/E ratio is 27.56. In terms of profitability, ARES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VTSAX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ARES is more volatile compared to VTSAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARES.Check VTSAX's competition here

ARES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARES stands at 37.1B. In comparison, VITSX has a market cap of 2T. Regarding current trading prices, ARES is priced at $113.01, while VITSX trades at $170.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARES currently has a P/E ratio of 65.69, whereas VITSX's P/E ratio is 27.56. In terms of profitability, ARES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VITSX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ARES is more volatile compared to VITSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARES.Check VITSX's competition here

ARES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARES stands at 37.1B. In comparison, PMFLX has a market cap of 1.9T. Regarding current trading prices, ARES is priced at $113.01, while PMFLX trades at $10.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARES currently has a P/E ratio of 65.69, whereas PMFLX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ARES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PMFLX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ARES is more volatile compared to PMFLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARES.Check PMFLX's competition here

ARES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARES stands at 37.1B. In comparison, VFIAX has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, ARES is priced at $113.01, while VFIAX trades at $659.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARES currently has a P/E ratio of 65.69, whereas VFIAX's P/E ratio is 28.38. In terms of profitability, ARES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VFIAX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ARES is more volatile compared to VFIAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARES.Check VFIAX's competition here

ARES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARES stands at 37.1B. In comparison, VFINX has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, ARES is priced at $113.01, while VFINX trades at $659.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARES currently has a P/E ratio of 65.69, whereas VFINX's P/E ratio is 28.38. In terms of profitability, ARES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VFINX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ARES is more volatile compared to VFINX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARES.Check VFINX's competition here

ARES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARES stands at 37.1B. In comparison, VFFSX has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, ARES is priced at $113.01, while VFFSX trades at $349.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARES currently has a P/E ratio of 65.69, whereas VFFSX's P/E ratio is 28.38. In terms of profitability, ARES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VFFSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ARES is more volatile compared to VFFSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARES.Check VFFSX's competition here

ARES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARES stands at 37.1B. In comparison, VOO has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, ARES is priced at $113.01, while VOO trades at $654.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARES currently has a P/E ratio of 65.69, whereas VOO's P/E ratio is 28.25. In terms of profitability, ARES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VOO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ARES is more volatile compared to VOO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARES.Check VOO's competition here

ARES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARES stands at 37.1B. In comparison, IVV has a market cap of 787B. Regarding current trading prices, ARES is priced at $113.01, while IVV trades at $714.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARES currently has a P/E ratio of 65.69, whereas IVV's P/E ratio is 28.22. In terms of profitability, ARES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IVV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ARES is more volatile compared to IVV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARES.Check IVV's competition here

ARES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARES stands at 37.1B. In comparison, SPY has a market cap of 726.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ARES is priced at $113.01, while SPY trades at $711.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARES currently has a P/E ratio of 65.69, whereas SPY's P/E ratio is 28.21. In terms of profitability, ARES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SPY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ARES is more volatile compared to SPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARES.Check SPY's competition here

ARES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARES stands at 37.1B. In comparison, FXAIX has a market cap of 715.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ARES is priced at $113.01, while FXAIX trades at $248.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARES currently has a P/E ratio of 65.69, whereas FXAIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ARES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FXAIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ARES is more volatile compared to FXAIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARES.Check FXAIX's competition here

ARES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARES stands at 37.1B. In comparison, VTI has a market cap of 600.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ARES is priced at $113.01, while VTI trades at $350.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARES currently has a P/E ratio of 65.69, whereas VTI's P/E ratio is 27.43. In terms of profitability, ARES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VTI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ARES is more volatile compared to VTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARES.Check VTI's competition here

ARES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARES stands at 37.1B. In comparison, VTIAX has a market cap of 585.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ARES is priced at $113.01, while VTIAX trades at $43.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARES currently has a P/E ratio of 65.69, whereas VTIAX's P/E ratio is 18.13. In terms of profitability, ARES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VTIAX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ARES is more volatile compared to VTIAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARES.Check VTIAX's competition here

ARES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARES stands at 37.1B. In comparison, VXUS has a market cap of 583.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ARES is priced at $113.01, while VXUS trades at $81.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARES currently has a P/E ratio of 65.69, whereas VXUS's P/E ratio is 17.95. In terms of profitability, ARES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VXUS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ARES is more volatile compared to VXUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARES.Check VXUS's competition here

ARES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARES stands at 37.1B. In comparison, VTSNX has a market cap of 581.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ARES is priced at $113.01, while VTSNX trades at $175.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARES currently has a P/E ratio of 65.69, whereas VTSNX's P/E ratio is 18.13. In terms of profitability, ARES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VTSNX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ARES is more volatile compared to VTSNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARES.Check VTSNX's competition here

ARES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARES stands at 37.1B. In comparison, VTPSX has a market cap of 581.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ARES is priced at $113.01, while VTPSX trades at $175.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARES currently has a P/E ratio of 65.69, whereas VTPSX's P/E ratio is 18.13. In terms of profitability, ARES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VTPSX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ARES is more volatile compared to VTPSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARES.Check VTPSX's competition here

ARES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARES stands at 37.1B. In comparison, BMOP has a market cap of 437.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ARES is priced at $113.01, while BMOP trades at $24.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARES currently has a P/E ratio of 65.69, whereas BMOP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ARES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BMOP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ARES is more volatile compared to BMOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARES.Check BMOP's competition here

ARES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARES stands at 37.1B. In comparison, QQQ has a market cap of 376B. Regarding current trading prices, ARES is priced at $113.01, while QQQ trades at $657.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARES currently has a P/E ratio of 65.69, whereas QQQ's P/E ratio is 34.74. In terms of profitability, ARES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to QQQ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ARES is more volatile compared to QQQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARES.Check QQQ's competition here

ARES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARES stands at 37.1B. In comparison, VUG has a market cap of 320.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ARES is priced at $113.01, while VUG trades at $82.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARES currently has a P/E ratio of 65.69, whereas VUG's P/E ratio is 6.18. In terms of profitability, ARES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VUG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ARES is more volatile compared to VUG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARES.Check VUG's competition here

ARES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARES stands at 37.1B. In comparison, VIGAX has a market cap of 318.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ARES is priced at $113.01, while VIGAX trades at $255.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARES currently has a P/E ratio of 65.69, whereas VIGAX's P/E ratio is 37.38. In terms of profitability, ARES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VIGAX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ARES is more volatile compared to VIGAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARES.Check VIGAX's competition here

ARES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARES stands at 37.1B. In comparison, VIGIX has a market cap of 318.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ARES is priced at $113.01, while VIGIX trades at $255.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARES currently has a P/E ratio of 65.69, whereas VIGIX's P/E ratio is 37.37. In terms of profitability, ARES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VIGIX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ARES is more volatile compared to VIGIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARES.Check VIGIX's competition here

ARES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARES stands at 37.1B. In comparison, VINIX has a market cap of 315.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ARES is priced at $113.01, while VINIX trades at $571.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARES currently has a P/E ratio of 65.69, whereas VINIX's P/E ratio is 28.38. In terms of profitability, ARES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VINIX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ARES is more volatile compared to VINIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARES.Check VINIX's competition here

ARES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARES stands at 37.1B. In comparison, VIIIX has a market cap of 315.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ARES is priced at $113.01, while VIIIX trades at $571.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARES currently has a P/E ratio of 65.69, whereas VIIIX's P/E ratio is 28.38. In terms of profitability, ARES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VIIIX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ARES is more volatile compared to VIIIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARES.Check VIIIX's competition here

ARES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARES stands at 37.1B. In comparison, LACG has a market cap of 303.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ARES is priced at $113.01, while LACG trades at $10.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARES currently has a P/E ratio of 65.69, whereas LACG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ARES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LACG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ARES is less volatile compared to LACG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARES.Check LACG's competition here

ARES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARES stands at 37.1B. In comparison, RGAGX has a market cap of 293B. Regarding current trading prices, ARES is priced at $113.01, while RGAGX trades at $81.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARES currently has a P/E ratio of 65.69, whereas RGAGX's P/E ratio is 31.35. In terms of profitability, ARES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RGAGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ARES is more volatile compared to RGAGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARES.Check RGAGX's competition here

ARES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARES stands at 37.1B. In comparison, GAFFX has a market cap of 292.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ARES is priced at $113.01, while GAFFX trades at $81.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARES currently has a P/E ratio of 65.69, whereas GAFFX's P/E ratio is 31.35. In terms of profitability, ARES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GAFFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ARES is more volatile compared to GAFFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARES.Check GAFFX's competition here

ARES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARES stands at 37.1B. In comparison, AGTHX has a market cap of 292.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ARES is priced at $113.01, while AGTHX trades at $81.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARES currently has a P/E ratio of 65.69, whereas AGTHX's P/E ratio is 31.34. In terms of profitability, ARES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AGTHX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ARES is more volatile compared to AGTHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARES.Check AGTHX's competition here

ARES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARES stands at 37.1B. In comparison, GFFFX has a market cap of 291.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ARES is priced at $113.01, while GFFFX trades at $81.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARES currently has a P/E ratio of 65.69, whereas GFFFX's P/E ratio is 30.58. In terms of profitability, ARES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GFFFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ARES is more volatile compared to GFFFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARES.Check GFFFX's competition here

ARES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARES stands at 37.1B. In comparison, GFAFX has a market cap of 289.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ARES is priced at $113.01, while GFAFX trades at $80.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARES currently has a P/E ratio of 65.69, whereas GFAFX's P/E ratio is 31.34. In terms of profitability, ARES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GFAFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ARES is more volatile compared to GFAFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARES.Check GFAFX's competition here

ARES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARES stands at 37.1B. In comparison, CGFAX has a market cap of 286.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ARES is priced at $113.01, while CGFAX trades at $80.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARES currently has a P/E ratio of 65.69, whereas CGFAX's P/E ratio is 31.34. In terms of profitability, ARES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CGFAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ARES is more volatile compared to CGFAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARES.Check CGFAX's competition here

ARES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARES stands at 37.1B. In comparison, VDIPX has a market cap of 283.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ARES is priced at $113.01, while VDIPX trades at $34.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARES currently has a P/E ratio of 65.69, whereas VDIPX's P/E ratio is 18.56. In terms of profitability, ARES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VDIPX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ARES is more volatile compared to VDIPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARES.Check VDIPX's competition here

ARES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARES stands at 37.1B. In comparison, VTMNX has a market cap of 281.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ARES is priced at $113.01, while VTMNX trades at $21.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARES currently has a P/E ratio of 65.69, whereas VTMNX's P/E ratio is 18.56. In terms of profitability, ARES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VTMNX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ARES is more volatile compared to VTMNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARES.Check VTMNX's competition here

ARES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARES stands at 37.1B. In comparison, VTMGX has a market cap of 281.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ARES is priced at $113.01, while VTMGX trades at $21.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARES currently has a P/E ratio of 65.69, whereas VTMGX's P/E ratio is 18.55. In terms of profitability, ARES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VTMGX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ARES is more volatile compared to VTMGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARES.Check VTMGX's competition here

ARES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARES stands at 37.1B. In comparison, VEA has a market cap of 280.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ARES is priced at $113.01, while VEA trades at $67.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARES currently has a P/E ratio of 65.69, whereas VEA's P/E ratio is 18.48. In terms of profitability, ARES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VEA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ARES is more volatile compared to VEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARES.Check VEA's competition here

ARES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARES stands at 37.1B. In comparison, CLBAX has a market cap of 263.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ARES is priced at $113.01, while CLBAX trades at $39.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARES currently has a P/E ratio of 65.69, whereas CLBAX's P/E ratio is 25.60. In terms of profitability, ARES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CLBAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ARES is more volatile compared to CLBAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARES.Check CLBAX's competition here

ARES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARES stands at 37.1B. In comparison, BALFX has a market cap of 263.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ARES is priced at $113.01, while BALFX trades at $39.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARES currently has a P/E ratio of 65.69, whereas BALFX's P/E ratio is 25.60. In terms of profitability, ARES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BALFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ARES is more volatile compared to BALFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARES.Check BALFX's competition here

ARES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARES stands at 37.1B. In comparison, AMBFX has a market cap of 263.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ARES is priced at $113.01, while AMBFX trades at $39.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARES currently has a P/E ratio of 65.69, whereas AMBFX's P/E ratio is 25.60. In terms of profitability, ARES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AMBFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ARES is more volatile compared to AMBFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARES.Check AMBFX's competition here

ARES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARES stands at 37.1B. In comparison, AFMBX has a market cap of 263.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ARES is priced at $113.01, while AFMBX trades at $39.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARES currently has a P/E ratio of 65.69, whereas AFMBX's P/E ratio is 25.61. In terms of profitability, ARES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AFMBX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ARES is more volatile compared to AFMBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARES.Check AFMBX's competition here

ARES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARES stands at 37.1B. In comparison, ABALX has a market cap of 263.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ARES is priced at $113.01, while ABALX trades at $39.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARES currently has a P/E ratio of 65.69, whereas ABALX's P/E ratio is 25.59. In terms of profitability, ARES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ABALX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ARES is more volatile compared to ABALX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARES.Check ABALX's competition here

ARES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARES stands at 37.1B. In comparison, RLBGX has a market cap of 263.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ARES is priced at $113.01, while RLBGX trades at $39.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARES currently has a P/E ratio of 65.69, whereas RLBGX's P/E ratio is 25.61. In terms of profitability, ARES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RLBGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ARES is more volatile compared to RLBGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARES.Check RLBGX's competition here

ARES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARES stands at 37.1B. In comparison, RGABX has a market cap of 255.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ARES is priced at $113.01, while RGABX trades at $71.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARES currently has a P/E ratio of 65.69, whereas RGABX's P/E ratio is 30.48. In terms of profitability, ARES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RGABX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ARES is more volatile compared to RGABX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARES.Check RGABX's competition here

ARES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARES stands at 37.1B. In comparison, RGAAX has a market cap of 250.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ARES is priced at $113.01, while RGAAX trades at $69.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARES currently has a P/E ratio of 65.69, whereas RGAAX's P/E ratio is 30.49. In terms of profitability, ARES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RGAAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ARES is more volatile compared to RGAAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARES.Check RGAAX's competition here

ARES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARES stands at 37.1B. In comparison, GFACX has a market cap of 243.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ARES is priced at $113.01, while GFACX trades at $68.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARES currently has a P/E ratio of 65.69, whereas GFACX's P/E ratio is 31.32. In terms of profitability, ARES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GFACX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ARES is more volatile compared to GFACX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARES.Check GFACX's competition here

ARES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARES stands at 37.1B. In comparison, VVIAX has a market cap of 225.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ARES is priced at $113.01, while VVIAX trades at $79.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARES currently has a P/E ratio of 65.69, whereas VVIAX's P/E ratio is 21.38. In terms of profitability, ARES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VVIAX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ARES is more volatile compared to VVIAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARES.Check VVIAX's competition here

ARES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARES stands at 37.1B. In comparison, VTV has a market cap of 225.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ARES is priced at $113.01, while VTV trades at $203.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARES currently has a P/E ratio of 65.69, whereas VTV's P/E ratio is 21.39. In terms of profitability, ARES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VTV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ARES is more volatile compared to VTV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARES.Check VTV's competition here

ARES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARES stands at 37.1B. In comparison, ODIDX has a market cap of 214.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ARES is priced at $113.01, while ODIDX trades at $8.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARES currently has a P/E ratio of 65.69, whereas ODIDX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ARES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ODIDX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ARES is more volatile compared to ODIDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARES.Check ODIDX's competition here

ARES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARES stands at 37.1B. In comparison, FCTDX has a market cap of 214B. Regarding current trading prices, ARES is priced at $113.01, while FCTDX trades at $20.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARES currently has a P/E ratio of 65.69, whereas FCTDX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ARES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FCTDX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ARES is more volatile compared to FCTDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARES.Check FCTDX's competition here

ARES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARES stands at 37.1B. In comparison, VMCIX has a market cap of 197.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ARES is priced at $113.01, while VMCIX trades at $83.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARES currently has a P/E ratio of 65.69, whereas VMCIX's P/E ratio is 24.29. In terms of profitability, ARES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VMCIX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ARES is more volatile compared to VMCIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARES.Check VMCIX's competition here

ARES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARES stands at 37.1B. In comparison, VIMAX has a market cap of 197.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ARES is priced at $113.01, while VIMAX trades at $376.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARES currently has a P/E ratio of 65.69, whereas VIMAX's P/E ratio is 24.29. In terms of profitability, ARES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VIMAX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ARES is more volatile compared to VIMAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARES.Check VIMAX's competition here

ARES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARES stands at 37.1B. In comparison, VMCPX has a market cap of 197.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ARES is priced at $113.01, while VMCPX trades at $410.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARES currently has a P/E ratio of 65.69, whereas VMCPX's P/E ratio is 24.29. In terms of profitability, ARES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VMCPX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ARES is more volatile compared to VMCPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARES.Check VMCPX's competition here

ARES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARES stands at 37.1B. In comparison, VO has a market cap of 196.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ARES is priced at $113.01, while VO trades at $76.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARES currently has a P/E ratio of 65.69, whereas VO's P/E ratio is 6.03. In terms of profitability, ARES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ARES is more volatile compared to VO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARES.Check VO's competition here

ARES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARES stands at 37.1B. In comparison, MER-PK has a market cap of 194.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ARES is priced at $113.01, while MER-PK trades at $25.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARES currently has a P/E ratio of 65.69, whereas MER-PK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ARES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MER-PK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ARES is more volatile compared to MER-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARES.Check MER-PK's competition here

ARES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARES stands at 37.1B. In comparison, C-PN has a market cap of 175.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ARES is priced at $113.01, while C-PN trades at $30.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARES currently has a P/E ratio of 65.69, whereas C-PN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ARES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to C-PN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ARES is more volatile compared to C-PN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARES.Check C-PN's competition here

ARES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARES stands at 37.1B. In comparison, IEFA has a market cap of 168.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ARES is priced at $113.01, while IEFA trades at $94.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARES currently has a P/E ratio of 65.69, whereas IEFA's P/E ratio is 18.24. In terms of profitability, ARES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IEFA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ARES is more volatile compared to IEFA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARES.Check IEFA's competition here

ARES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARES stands at 37.1B. In comparison, CICAX has a market cap of 166.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ARES is priced at $113.01, while CICAX trades at $64.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARES currently has a P/E ratio of 65.69, whereas CICAX's P/E ratio is 27.32. In terms of profitability, ARES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CICAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ARES is more volatile compared to CICAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARES.Check CICAX's competition here

ARES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARES stands at 37.1B. In comparison, RICAX has a market cap of 166B. Regarding current trading prices, ARES is priced at $113.01, while RICAX trades at $64.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARES currently has a P/E ratio of 65.69, whereas RICAX's P/E ratio is 27.30. In terms of profitability, ARES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RICAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ARES is more volatile compared to RICAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARES.Check RICAX's competition here

ARES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARES stands at 37.1B. In comparison, RICBX has a market cap of 166B. Regarding current trading prices, ARES is priced at $113.01, while RICBX trades at $64.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARES currently has a P/E ratio of 65.69, whereas RICBX's P/E ratio is 27.31. In terms of profitability, ARES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RICBX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ARES is more volatile compared to RICBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARES.Check RICBX's competition here

ARES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARES stands at 37.1B. In comparison, AICFX has a market cap of 166B. Regarding current trading prices, ARES is priced at $113.01, while AICFX trades at $64.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARES currently has a P/E ratio of 65.69, whereas AICFX's P/E ratio is 27.32. In terms of profitability, ARES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AICFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ARES is more volatile compared to AICFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARES.Check AICFX's competition here

ARES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARES stands at 37.1B. In comparison, AIVSX has a market cap of 166B. Regarding current trading prices, ARES is priced at $113.01, while AIVSX trades at $65.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARES currently has a P/E ratio of 65.69, whereas AIVSX's P/E ratio is 27.32. In terms of profitability, ARES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AIVSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ARES is more volatile compared to AIVSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARES.Check AIVSX's competition here

ARES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARES stands at 37.1B. In comparison, FFICX has a market cap of 165.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ARES is priced at $113.01, while FFICX trades at $65.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARES currently has a P/E ratio of 65.69, whereas FFICX's P/E ratio is 27.33. In terms of profitability, ARES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FFICX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ARES is more volatile compared to FFICX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARES.Check FFICX's competition here

ARES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARES stands at 37.1B. In comparison, AICCX has a market cap of 165.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ARES is priced at $113.01, while AICCX trades at $64.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARES currently has a P/E ratio of 65.69, whereas AICCX's P/E ratio is 27.30. In terms of profitability, ARES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AICCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ARES is more volatile compared to AICCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARES.Check AICCX's competition here

ARES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARES stands at 37.1B. In comparison, IEMG has a market cap of 164.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ARES is priced at $113.01, while IEMG trades at $77.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARES currently has a P/E ratio of 65.69, whereas IEMG's P/E ratio is 17.31. In terms of profitability, ARES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IEMG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ARES is more volatile compared to IEMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARES.Check IEMG's competition here

ARES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARES stands at 37.1B. In comparison, VSMAX has a market cap of 164.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ARES is priced at $113.01, while VSMAX trades at $134.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARES currently has a P/E ratio of 65.69, whereas VSMAX's P/E ratio is 22.04. In terms of profitability, ARES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VSMAX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ARES is more volatile compared to VSMAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARES.Check VSMAX's competition here

ARES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARES stands at 37.1B. In comparison, VSCIX has a market cap of 164.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ARES is priced at $113.01, while VSCIX trades at $134.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARES currently has a P/E ratio of 65.69, whereas VSCIX's P/E ratio is 22.04. In terms of profitability, ARES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VSCIX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ARES is more volatile compared to VSCIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARES.Check VSCIX's competition here

ARES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARES stands at 37.1B. In comparison, BLK has a market cap of 163.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ARES is priced at $113.01, while BLK trades at $1,049.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARES currently has a P/E ratio of 65.69, whereas BLK's P/E ratio is 26.44. In terms of profitability, ARES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BLK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ARES is more volatile compared to BLK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARES.Check BLK's competition here

ARES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARES stands at 37.1B. In comparison, VB has a market cap of 163B. Regarding current trading prices, ARES is priced at $113.01, while VB trades at $280.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARES currently has a P/E ratio of 65.69, whereas VB's P/E ratio is 21.83. In terms of profitability, ARES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ARES is more volatile compared to VB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARES.Check VB's competition here

ARES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARES stands at 37.1B. In comparison, GRAG has a market cap of 160.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ARES is priced at $113.01, while GRAG trades at $7.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARES currently has a P/E ratio of 65.69, whereas GRAG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ARES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GRAG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ARES is more volatile compared to GRAG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARES.Check GRAG's competition here

ARES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARES stands at 37.1B. In comparison, FCNTX has a market cap of 158.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ARES is priced at $113.01, while FCNTX trades at $25.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARES currently has a P/E ratio of 65.69, whereas FCNTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ARES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FCNTX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ARES is more volatile compared to FCNTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARES.Check FCNTX's competition here

ARES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARES stands at 37.1B. In comparison, FCNKX has a market cap of 157.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ARES is priced at $113.01, while FCNKX trades at $25.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARES currently has a P/E ratio of 65.69, whereas FCNKX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ARES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FCNKX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ARES is more volatile compared to FCNKX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARES.Check FCNKX's competition here

ARES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARES stands at 37.1B. In comparison, GLD has a market cap of 155.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ARES is priced at $113.01, while GLD trades at $421.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARES currently has a P/E ratio of 65.69, whereas GLD's P/E ratio is -44.92. In terms of profitability, ARES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GLD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ARES is more volatile compared to GLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARES.Check GLD's competition here

ARES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARES stands at 37.1B. In comparison, FPMAX has a market cap of 155.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ARES is priced at $113.01, while FPMAX trades at $10.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARES currently has a P/E ratio of 65.69, whereas FPMAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ARES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FPMAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ARES is more volatile compared to FPMAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARES.Check FPMAX's competition here

ARES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARES stands at 37.1B. In comparison, FUNFX has a market cap of 155.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ARES is priced at $113.01, while FUNFX trades at $98.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARES currently has a P/E ratio of 65.69, whereas FUNFX's P/E ratio is 27.77. In terms of profitability, ARES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FUNFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ARES is more volatile compared to FUNFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARES.Check FUNFX's competition here

ARES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARES stands at 37.1B. In comparison, AFIFX has a market cap of 154.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ARES is priced at $113.01, while AFIFX trades at $98.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARES currently has a P/E ratio of 65.69, whereas AFIFX's P/E ratio is 27.76. In terms of profitability, ARES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AFIFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ARES is more volatile compared to AFIFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARES.Check AFIFX's competition here

ARES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARES stands at 37.1B. In comparison, ANCFX has a market cap of 154.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ARES is priced at $113.01, while ANCFX trades at $98.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARES currently has a P/E ratio of 65.69, whereas ANCFX's P/E ratio is 27.76. In terms of profitability, ARES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ANCFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ARES is more volatile compared to ANCFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARES.Check ANCFX's competition here

ARES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARES stands at 37.1B. In comparison, RFNCX has a market cap of 154.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ARES is priced at $113.01, while RFNCX trades at $97.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARES currently has a P/E ratio of 65.69, whereas RFNCX's P/E ratio is 27.76. In terms of profitability, ARES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RFNCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ARES is more volatile compared to RFNCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARES.Check RFNCX's competition here

ARES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARES stands at 37.1B. In comparison, FINFX has a market cap of 154.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ARES is priced at $113.01, while FINFX trades at $98.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARES currently has a P/E ratio of 65.69, whereas FINFX's P/E ratio is 27.77. In terms of profitability, ARES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FINFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ARES is more volatile compared to FINFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARES.Check FINFX's competition here

ARES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARES stands at 37.1B. In comparison, CFNAX has a market cap of 153.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ARES is priced at $113.01, while CFNAX trades at $98.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARES currently has a P/E ratio of 65.69, whereas CFNAX's P/E ratio is 27.76. In terms of profitability, ARES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CFNAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ARES is more volatile compared to CFNAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARES.Check CFNAX's competition here

ARES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARES stands at 37.1B. In comparison, ANWPX has a market cap of 153.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ARES is priced at $113.01, while ANWPX trades at $71.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARES currently has a P/E ratio of 65.69, whereas ANWPX's P/E ratio is 26.12. In terms of profitability, ARES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ANWPX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ARES is more volatile compared to ANWPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARES.Check ANWPX's competition here

ARES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARES stands at 37.1B. In comparison, FNPFX has a market cap of 152.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ARES is priced at $113.01, while FNPFX trades at $71.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARES currently has a P/E ratio of 65.69, whereas FNPFX's P/E ratio is 26.13. In terms of profitability, ARES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FNPFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ARES is more volatile compared to FNPFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARES.Check FNPFX's competition here

ARES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARES stands at 37.1B. In comparison, RNPGX has a market cap of 152.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ARES is priced at $113.01, while RNPGX trades at $71.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARES currently has a P/E ratio of 65.69, whereas RNPGX's P/E ratio is 26.13. In terms of profitability, ARES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RNPGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ARES is more volatile compared to RNPGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARES.Check RNPGX's competition here

ARES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARES stands at 37.1B. In comparison, NPFFX has a market cap of 152.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ARES is priced at $113.01, while NPFFX trades at $71.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARES currently has a P/E ratio of 65.69, whereas NPFFX's P/E ratio is 26.12. In terms of profitability, ARES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NPFFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ARES is more volatile compared to NPFFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARES.Check NPFFX's competition here

ARES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARES stands at 37.1B. In comparison, RNPCX has a market cap of 152.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ARES is priced at $113.01, while RNPCX trades at $69.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARES currently has a P/E ratio of 65.69, whereas RNPCX's P/E ratio is 26.11. In terms of profitability, ARES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RNPCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ARES is more volatile compared to RNPCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARES.Check RNPCX's competition here

ARES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARES stands at 37.1B. In comparison, AWSHX has a market cap of 150B. Regarding current trading prices, ARES is priced at $113.01, while AWSHX trades at $66.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARES currently has a P/E ratio of 65.69, whereas AWSHX's P/E ratio is 25.86. In terms of profitability, ARES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AWSHX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ARES is more volatile compared to AWSHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARES.Check AWSHX's competition here

ARES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARES stands at 37.1B. In comparison, RWMFX has a market cap of 149.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ARES is priced at $113.01, while RWMFX trades at $66.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARES currently has a P/E ratio of 65.69, whereas RWMFX's P/E ratio is 25.86. In terms of profitability, ARES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RWMFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ARES is more volatile compared to RWMFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARES.Check RWMFX's competition here

ARES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARES stands at 37.1B. In comparison, FWMIX has a market cap of 149.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ARES is priced at $113.01, while FWMIX trades at $66.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARES currently has a P/E ratio of 65.69, whereas FWMIX's P/E ratio is 25.86. In terms of profitability, ARES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FWMIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ARES is more volatile compared to FWMIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARES.Check FWMIX's competition here

ARES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARES stands at 37.1B. In comparison, CWMAX has a market cap of 149.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ARES is priced at $113.01, while CWMAX trades at $66.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARES currently has a P/E ratio of 65.69, whereas CWMAX's P/E ratio is 25.86. In terms of profitability, ARES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CWMAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ARES is more volatile compared to CWMAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARES.Check CWMAX's competition here

ARES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARES stands at 37.1B. In comparison, WSHFX has a market cap of 149B. Regarding current trading prices, ARES is priced at $113.01, while WSHFX trades at $66.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARES currently has a P/E ratio of 65.69, whereas WSHFX's P/E ratio is 25.86. In terms of profitability, ARES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WSHFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ARES is more volatile compared to WSHFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARES.Check WSHFX's competition here

ARES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARES stands at 37.1B. In comparison, WSHCX has a market cap of 146.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ARES is priced at $113.01, while WSHCX trades at $65.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARES currently has a P/E ratio of 65.69, whereas WSHCX's P/E ratio is 25.84. In terms of profitability, ARES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WSHCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ARES is more volatile compared to WSHCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARES.Check WSHCX's competition here

ARES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARES stands at 37.1B. In comparison, RWMBX has a market cap of 146.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ARES is priced at $113.01, while RWMBX trades at $65.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARES currently has a P/E ratio of 65.69, whereas RWMBX's P/E ratio is 25.84. In terms of profitability, ARES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RWMBX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ARES is more volatile compared to RWMBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARES.Check RWMBX's competition here

ARES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARES stands at 37.1B. In comparison, BX has a market cap of 146B. Regarding current trading prices, ARES is priced at $113.01, while BX trades at $121.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARES currently has a P/E ratio of 65.69, whereas BX's P/E ratio is 31.17. In terms of profitability, ARES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BX's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, ARES is more volatile compared to BX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARES.Check BX's competition here

ARES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARES stands at 37.1B. In comparison, VEMAX has a market cap of 145.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ARES is priced at $113.01, while VEMAX trades at $48.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARES currently has a P/E ratio of 65.69, whereas VEMAX's P/E ratio is 17.07. In terms of profitability, ARES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VEMAX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ARES is more volatile compared to VEMAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARES.Check VEMAX's competition here

ARES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARES stands at 37.1B. In comparison, VEMRX has a market cap of 145.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ARES is priced at $113.01, while VEMRX trades at $122.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARES currently has a P/E ratio of 65.69, whereas VEMRX's P/E ratio is 17.07. In terms of profitability, ARES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VEMRX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ARES is more volatile compared to VEMRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARES.Check VEMRX's competition here

ARES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARES stands at 37.1B. In comparison, VWO has a market cap of 145.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ARES is priced at $113.01, while VWO trades at $58.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARES currently has a P/E ratio of 65.69, whereas VWO's P/E ratio is 17.00. In terms of profitability, ARES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VWO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ARES is more volatile compared to VWO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARES.Check VWO's competition here

ARES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARES stands at 37.1B. In comparison, FIFAX has a market cap of 141.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ARES is priced at $113.01, while FIFAX trades at $27.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARES currently has a P/E ratio of 65.69, whereas FIFAX's P/E ratio is 19.20. In terms of profitability, ARES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FIFAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ARES is more volatile compared to FIFAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARES.Check FIFAX's competition here

ARES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARES stands at 37.1B. In comparison, WGIFX has a market cap of 138.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ARES is priced at $113.01, while WGIFX trades at $76.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARES currently has a P/E ratio of 65.69, whereas WGIFX's P/E ratio is 23.86. In terms of profitability, ARES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WGIFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ARES is more volatile compared to WGIFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARES.Check WGIFX's competition here

ARES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARES stands at 37.1B. In comparison, AGG has a market cap of 135.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ARES is priced at $113.01, while AGG trades at $99.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARES currently has a P/E ratio of 65.69, whereas AGG's P/E ratio is 126.79. In terms of profitability, ARES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AGG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ARES is more volatile compared to AGG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARES.Check AGG's competition here

ARES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARES stands at 37.1B. In comparison, IWF has a market cap of 134.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ARES is priced at $113.01, while IWF trades at $476.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARES currently has a P/E ratio of 65.69, whereas IWF's P/E ratio is 35.70. In terms of profitability, ARES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IWF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ARES is more volatile compared to IWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARES.Check IWF's competition here

ARES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARES stands at 37.1B. In comparison, NAESX has a market cap of 130.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ARES is priced at $113.01, while NAESX trades at $134.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARES currently has a P/E ratio of 65.69, whereas NAESX's P/E ratio is 22.04. In terms of profitability, ARES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NAESX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ARES is more volatile compared to NAESX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARES.Check NAESX's competition here

ARES plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARES stands at 37.1B. In comparison, AEPGX has a market cap of 126.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ARES is priced at $113.01, while AEPGX trades at $63.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARES currently has a P/E ratio of 65.69, whereas AEPGX's P/E ratio is 19.36. In terms of profitability, ARES's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AEPGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ARES is more volatile compared to AEPGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARES.Check AEPGX's competition here