Alpha Lithium Corp
Alpha Lithium Corp APHLF Peers
See (APHLF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| APHLF | $1.10 | +0.39% | 207.8M | -27.61 | -$0.04 | N/A |
| BHPLF | $25.15 | +2.03% | 127.6B | 11.23 | $2.24 | +4.93% |
| RTNTF | $72.00 | -1.52% | 118.4B | 10.18 | $7.07 | +3.26% |
| RTPPF | $58.19 | -1.53% | 99.1B | 8.23 | $7.07 | +6.91% |
| GLNCY | $7.87 | +1.03% | 47B | -29.15 | -$0.27 | +2.72% |
| GLCNF | $3.93 | -0.06% | 46.9B | -30.23 | -$0.13 | +2.93% |
| GMBXF | $5.63 | +5.23% | 43.8B | 11.73 | $0.48 | +4.34% |
| AAUKF | $30.28 | N/A | 41.8B | -10.55 | -$2.87 | +2.10% |
| NGLOY | $15.09 | +3.57% | 32.2B | -10.48 | -$1.44 | +2.12% |
| FSUMF | $10.20 | +2.00% | 31.4B | 8.03 | $1.27 | +8.68% |
Stock Comparison
APHLF vs BHPLF Comparison
APHLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APHLF stands at 207.8M. In comparison, BHPLF has a market cap of 127.6B. Regarding current trading prices, APHLF is priced at $1.10, while BHPLF trades at $25.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.61, whereas BHPLF's P/E ratio is 11.23. In terms of profitability, APHLF's ROE is -0.25%, compared to BHPLF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, APHLF is more volatile compared to BHPLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APHLF.
APHLF vs RTNTF Comparison
APHLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APHLF stands at 207.8M. In comparison, RTNTF has a market cap of 118.4B. Regarding current trading prices, APHLF is priced at $1.10, while RTNTF trades at $72.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.61, whereas RTNTF's P/E ratio is 10.18. In terms of profitability, APHLF's ROE is -0.25%, compared to RTNTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, APHLF is more volatile compared to RTNTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APHLF.
APHLF vs RTPPF Comparison
APHLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APHLF stands at 207.8M. In comparison, RTPPF has a market cap of 99.1B. Regarding current trading prices, APHLF is priced at $1.10, while RTPPF trades at $58.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.61, whereas RTPPF's P/E ratio is 8.23. In terms of profitability, APHLF's ROE is -0.25%, compared to RTPPF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, APHLF is more volatile compared to RTPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APHLF.
APHLF vs GLNCY Comparison
APHLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APHLF stands at 207.8M. In comparison, GLNCY has a market cap of 47B. Regarding current trading prices, APHLF is priced at $1.10, while GLNCY trades at $7.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.61, whereas GLNCY's P/E ratio is -29.15. In terms of profitability, APHLF's ROE is -0.25%, compared to GLNCY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, APHLF is more volatile compared to GLNCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APHLF.
APHLF vs GLCNF Comparison
APHLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APHLF stands at 207.8M. In comparison, GLCNF has a market cap of 46.9B. Regarding current trading prices, APHLF is priced at $1.10, while GLCNF trades at $3.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.61, whereas GLCNF's P/E ratio is -30.23. In terms of profitability, APHLF's ROE is -0.25%, compared to GLCNF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, APHLF is more volatile compared to GLCNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APHLF.
APHLF vs GMBXF Comparison
APHLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APHLF stands at 207.8M. In comparison, GMBXF has a market cap of 43.8B. Regarding current trading prices, APHLF is priced at $1.10, while GMBXF trades at $5.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.61, whereas GMBXF's P/E ratio is 11.73. In terms of profitability, APHLF's ROE is -0.25%, compared to GMBXF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, APHLF is less volatile compared to GMBXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APHLF.
APHLF vs AAUKF Comparison
APHLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APHLF stands at 207.8M. In comparison, AAUKF has a market cap of 41.8B. Regarding current trading prices, APHLF is priced at $1.10, while AAUKF trades at $30.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.61, whereas AAUKF's P/E ratio is -10.55. In terms of profitability, APHLF's ROE is -0.25%, compared to AAUKF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, APHLF is more volatile compared to AAUKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APHLF.
APHLF vs NGLOY Comparison
APHLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APHLF stands at 207.8M. In comparison, NGLOY has a market cap of 32.2B. Regarding current trading prices, APHLF is priced at $1.10, while NGLOY trades at $15.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.61, whereas NGLOY's P/E ratio is -10.48. In terms of profitability, APHLF's ROE is -0.25%, compared to NGLOY's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, APHLF is less volatile compared to NGLOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APHLF.
APHLF vs FSUMF Comparison
APHLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APHLF stands at 207.8M. In comparison, FSUMF has a market cap of 31.4B. Regarding current trading prices, APHLF is priced at $1.10, while FSUMF trades at $10.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.61, whereas FSUMF's P/E ratio is 8.03. In terms of profitability, APHLF's ROE is -0.25%, compared to FSUMF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, APHLF is less volatile compared to FSUMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APHLF.
APHLF vs FSUGY Comparison
APHLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APHLF stands at 207.8M. In comparison, FSUGY has a market cap of 30.9B. Regarding current trading prices, APHLF is priced at $1.10, while FSUGY trades at $20.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.61, whereas FSUGY's P/E ratio is 7.95. In terms of profitability, APHLF's ROE is -0.25%, compared to FSUGY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, APHLF is less volatile compared to FSUGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APHLF.
APHLF vs CMCLF Comparison
APHLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APHLF stands at 207.8M. In comparison, CMCLF has a market cap of 21.6B. Regarding current trading prices, APHLF is priced at $1.10, while CMCLF trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.61, whereas CMCLF's P/E ratio is 8.47. In terms of profitability, APHLF's ROE is -0.25%, compared to CMCLF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, APHLF is more volatile compared to CMCLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APHLF.
APHLF vs TCKRF Comparison
APHLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APHLF stands at 207.8M. In comparison, TCKRF has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, APHLF is priced at $1.10, while TCKRF trades at $33.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.61, whereas TCKRF's P/E ratio is 676.80. In terms of profitability, APHLF's ROE is -0.25%, compared to TCKRF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, APHLF is less volatile compared to TCKRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APHLF.
APHLF vs IVPAF Comparison
APHLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APHLF stands at 207.8M. In comparison, IVPAF has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, APHLF is priced at $1.10, while IVPAF trades at $8.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.61, whereas IVPAF's P/E ratio is 26.00. In terms of profitability, APHLF's ROE is -0.25%, compared to IVPAF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, APHLF is less volatile compared to IVPAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APHLF.
APHLF vs BOLIF Comparison
APHLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APHLF stands at 207.8M. In comparison, BOLIF has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, APHLF is priced at $1.10, while BOLIF trades at $34.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.61, whereas BOLIF's P/E ratio is 9.39. In terms of profitability, APHLF's ROE is -0.25%, compared to BOLIF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, APHLF is more volatile compared to BOLIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APHLF.
APHLF vs IPOAF Comparison
APHLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APHLF stands at 207.8M. In comparison, IPOAF has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, APHLF is priced at $1.10, while IPOAF trades at $23.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.61, whereas IPOAF's P/E ratio is 31.73. In terms of profitability, APHLF's ROE is -0.25%, compared to IPOAF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, APHLF is more volatile compared to IPOAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APHLF.
APHLF vs BDNNY Comparison
APHLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APHLF stands at 207.8M. In comparison, BDNNY has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, APHLF is priced at $1.10, while BDNNY trades at $64.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.61, whereas BDNNY's P/E ratio is 7.62. In terms of profitability, APHLF's ROE is -0.25%, compared to BDNNY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, APHLF is more volatile compared to BDNNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APHLF.
APHLF vs JXMNF Comparison
APHLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APHLF stands at 207.8M. In comparison, JXMNF has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, APHLF is priced at $1.10, while JXMNF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.61, whereas JXMNF's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, APHLF's ROE is -0.25%, compared to JXMNF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, APHLF is less volatile compared to JXMNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APHLF.
APHLF vs SHTLF Comparison
APHLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APHLF stands at 207.8M. In comparison, SHTLF has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, APHLF is priced at $1.10, while SHTLF trades at $1.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.61, whereas SHTLF's P/E ratio is -35.20. In terms of profitability, APHLF's ROE is -0.25%, compared to SHTLF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, APHLF is less volatile compared to SHTLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APHLF.
APHLF vs ABML Comparison
APHLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APHLF stands at 207.8M. In comparison, ABML has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, APHLF is priced at $1.10, while ABML trades at $9.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.61, whereas ABML's P/E ratio is -22.34. In terms of profitability, APHLF's ROE is -0.25%, compared to ABML's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, APHLF is less volatile compared to ABML. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APHLF.
APHLF vs STMNF Comparison
APHLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APHLF stands at 207.8M. In comparison, STMNF has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, APHLF is priced at $1.10, while STMNF trades at $23.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.61, whereas STMNF's P/E ratio is 55.95. In terms of profitability, APHLF's ROE is -0.25%, compared to STMNF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, APHLF is more volatile compared to STMNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APHLF.
APHLF vs SMMYY Comparison
APHLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APHLF stands at 207.8M. In comparison, SMMYY has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, APHLF is priced at $1.10, while SMMYY trades at $5.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.61, whereas SMMYY's P/E ratio is 58.10. In terms of profitability, APHLF's ROE is -0.25%, compared to SMMYY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, APHLF is more volatile compared to SMMYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APHLF.
APHLF vs LYSDY Comparison
APHLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APHLF stands at 207.8M. In comparison, LYSDY has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, APHLF is priced at $1.10, while LYSDY trades at $6.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.61, whereas LYSDY's P/E ratio is 202.00. In terms of profitability, APHLF's ROE is -0.25%, compared to LYSDY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, APHLF is less volatile compared to LYSDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APHLF.
APHLF vs LYSCF Comparison
APHLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APHLF stands at 207.8M. In comparison, LYSCF has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, APHLF is priced at $1.10, while LYSCF trades at $6.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.61, whereas LYSCF's P/E ratio is 201.33. In terms of profitability, APHLF's ROE is -0.25%, compared to LYSCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, APHLF is less volatile compared to LYSCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APHLF.
APHLF vs PUTKF Comparison
APHLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APHLF stands at 207.8M. In comparison, PUTKF has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, APHLF is priced at $1.10, while PUTKF trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.61, whereas PUTKF's P/E ratio is 4.52. In terms of profitability, APHLF's ROE is -0.25%, compared to PUTKF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, APHLF is more volatile compared to PUTKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APHLF.
APHLF vs PUTKY Comparison
APHLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APHLF stands at 207.8M. In comparison, PUTKY has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, APHLF is priced at $1.10, while PUTKY trades at $26.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.61, whereas PUTKY's P/E ratio is 4.35. In terms of profitability, APHLF's ROE is -0.25%, compared to PUTKY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, APHLF is less volatile compared to PUTKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APHLF.
APHLF vs NILSY Comparison
APHLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APHLF stands at 207.8M. In comparison, NILSY has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, APHLF is priced at $1.10, while NILSY trades at $3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.61, whereas NILSY's P/E ratio is 0.63. In terms of profitability, APHLF's ROE is -0.25%, compared to NILSY's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, APHLF is more volatile compared to NILSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APHLF.
APHLF vs PAEKY Comparison
APHLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APHLF stands at 207.8M. In comparison, PAEKY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, APHLF is priced at $1.10, while PAEKY trades at $17.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.61, whereas PAEKY's P/E ratio is 12.50. In terms of profitability, APHLF's ROE is -0.25%, compared to PAEKY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, APHLF is more volatile compared to PAEKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APHLF.
APHLF vs MALRF Comparison
APHLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APHLF stands at 207.8M. In comparison, MALRF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, APHLF is priced at $1.10, while MALRF trades at $15.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.61, whereas MALRF's P/E ratio is -3.87. In terms of profitability, APHLF's ROE is -0.25%, compared to MALRF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, APHLF is less volatile compared to MALRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APHLF.
APHLF vs FLMMF Comparison
APHLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APHLF stands at 207.8M. In comparison, FLMMF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, APHLF is priced at $1.10, while FLMMF trades at $22.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.61, whereas FLMMF's P/E ratio is -30.63. In terms of profitability, APHLF's ROE is -0.25%, compared to FLMMF's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, APHLF is more volatile compared to FLMMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APHLF.
APHLF vs MALRY Comparison
APHLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APHLF stands at 207.8M. In comparison, MALRY has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, APHLF is priced at $1.10, while MALRY trades at $15.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.61, whereas MALRY's P/E ratio is -3.76. In terms of profitability, APHLF's ROE is -0.25%, compared to MALRY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, APHLF is less volatile compared to MALRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APHLF.
APHLF vs PILBF Comparison
APHLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APHLF stands at 207.8M. In comparison, PILBF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, APHLF is priced at $1.10, while PILBF trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.61, whereas PILBF's P/E ratio is -88.00. In terms of profitability, APHLF's ROE is -0.25%, compared to PILBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, APHLF is less volatile compared to PILBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APHLF.
APHLF vs CHZQ Comparison
APHLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APHLF stands at 207.8M. In comparison, CHZQ has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, APHLF is priced at $1.10, while CHZQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.61, whereas CHZQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APHLF's ROE is -0.25%, compared to CHZQ's ROE of +4.40%. Regarding short-term risk, APHLF is more volatile compared to CHZQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APHLF.
APHLF vs NGXXF Comparison
APHLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APHLF stands at 207.8M. In comparison, NGXXF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, APHLF is priced at $1.10, while NGXXF trades at $11.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.61, whereas NGXXF's P/E ratio is -42.80. In terms of profitability, APHLF's ROE is -0.25%, compared to NGXXF's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, APHLF is less volatile compared to NGXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APHLF.
APHLF vs PTNDY Comparison
APHLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APHLF stands at 207.8M. In comparison, PTNDY has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, APHLF is priced at $1.10, while PTNDY trades at $10.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.61, whereas PTNDY's P/E ratio is 29.19. In terms of profitability, APHLF's ROE is -0.25%, compared to PTNDY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, APHLF is more volatile compared to PTNDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APHLF.
APHLF vs IPGDF Comparison
APHLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APHLF stands at 207.8M. In comparison, IPGDF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, APHLF is priced at $1.10, while IPGDF trades at $2.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.61, whereas IPGDF's P/E ratio is -3.11. In terms of profitability, APHLF's ROE is -0.25%, compared to IPGDF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, APHLF is more volatile compared to IPGDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APHLF.
APHLF vs MIMTF Comparison
APHLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APHLF stands at 207.8M. In comparison, MIMTF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, APHLF is priced at $1.10, while MIMTF trades at $15.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.61, whereas MIMTF's P/E ratio is 5.52. In terms of profitability, APHLF's ROE is -0.25%, compared to MIMTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, APHLF is more volatile compared to MIMTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APHLF.
APHLF vs NICMF Comparison
APHLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APHLF stands at 207.8M. In comparison, NICMF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, APHLF is priced at $1.10, while NICMF trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.61, whereas NICMF's P/E ratio is -11.73. In terms of profitability, APHLF's ROE is -0.25%, compared to NICMF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, APHLF is more volatile compared to NICMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APHLF.
APHLF vs PTNDF Comparison
APHLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APHLF stands at 207.8M. In comparison, PTNDF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, APHLF is priced at $1.10, while PTNDF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.61, whereas PTNDF's P/E ratio is 19.00. In terms of profitability, APHLF's ROE is -0.25%, compared to PTNDF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, APHLF is more volatile compared to PTNDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APHLF.
APHLF vs IIDDY Comparison
APHLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APHLF stands at 207.8M. In comparison, IIDDY has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, APHLF is priced at $1.10, while IIDDY trades at $5.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.61, whereas IIDDY's P/E ratio is -2.92. In terms of profitability, APHLF's ROE is -0.25%, compared to IIDDY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, APHLF is less volatile compared to IIDDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APHLF.
APHLF vs AZZVF Comparison
APHLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APHLF stands at 207.8M. In comparison, AZZVF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, APHLF is priced at $1.10, while AZZVF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.61, whereas AZZVF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APHLF's ROE is -0.25%, compared to AZZVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, APHLF is more volatile compared to AZZVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APHLF.
APHLF vs AFBOF Comparison
APHLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APHLF stands at 207.8M. In comparison, AFBOF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, APHLF is priced at $1.10, while AFBOF trades at $9.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.61, whereas AFBOF's P/E ratio is 9.96. In terms of profitability, APHLF's ROE is -0.25%, compared to AFBOF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, APHLF is less volatile compared to AFBOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APHLF.
APHLF vs DWMNF Comparison
APHLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APHLF stands at 207.8M. In comparison, DWMNF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, APHLF is priced at $1.10, while DWMNF trades at $30.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.61, whereas DWMNF's P/E ratio is 9.56. In terms of profitability, APHLF's ROE is -0.25%, compared to DWMNF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, APHLF is less volatile compared to DWMNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APHLF.
APHLF vs SOUHY Comparison
APHLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APHLF stands at 207.8M. In comparison, SOUHY has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, APHLF is priced at $1.10, while SOUHY trades at $9.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.61, whereas SOUHY's P/E ratio is -37.81. In terms of profitability, APHLF's ROE is -0.25%, compared to SOUHY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, APHLF is more volatile compared to SOUHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APHLF.
APHLF vs ERMAY Comparison
APHLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APHLF stands at 207.8M. In comparison, ERMAY has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, APHLF is priced at $1.10, while ERMAY trades at $5.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.61, whereas ERMAY's P/E ratio is 93.67. In terms of profitability, APHLF's ROE is -0.25%, compared to ERMAY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, APHLF is more volatile compared to ERMAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APHLF.
APHLF vs BSSMF Comparison
APHLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APHLF stands at 207.8M. In comparison, BSSMF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, APHLF is priced at $1.10, while BSSMF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.61, whereas BSSMF's P/E ratio is -100.00. In terms of profitability, APHLF's ROE is -0.25%, compared to BSSMF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, APHLF is more volatile compared to BSSMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APHLF.
APHLF vs ERMAF Comparison
APHLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APHLF stands at 207.8M. In comparison, ERMAF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, APHLF is priced at $1.10, while ERMAF trades at $54.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.61, whereas ERMAF's P/E ratio is 96.07. In terms of profitability, APHLF's ROE is -0.25%, compared to ERMAF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, APHLF is less volatile compared to ERMAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APHLF.
APHLF vs DETRF Comparison
APHLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APHLF stands at 207.8M. In comparison, DETRF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, APHLF is priced at $1.10, while DETRF trades at $2.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.61, whereas DETRF's P/E ratio is 15.65. In terms of profitability, APHLF's ROE is -0.25%, compared to DETRF's ROE of +1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, APHLF is less volatile compared to DETRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APHLF.
APHLF vs ADMLF Comparison
APHLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APHLF stands at 207.8M. In comparison, ADMLF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, APHLF is priced at $1.10, while ADMLF trades at $3.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.61, whereas ADMLF's P/E ratio is -13.88. In terms of profitability, APHLF's ROE is -0.25%, compared to ADMLF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, APHLF is less volatile compared to ADMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APHLF.
APHLF vs ADTLF Comparison
APHLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APHLF stands at 207.8M. In comparison, ADTLF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, APHLF is priced at $1.10, while ADTLF trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.61, whereas ADTLF's P/E ratio is -13.60. In terms of profitability, APHLF's ROE is -0.25%, compared to ADTLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, APHLF is more volatile compared to ADTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APHLF.
APHLF vs ILKAF Comparison
APHLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APHLF stands at 207.8M. In comparison, ILKAF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, APHLF is priced at $1.10, while ILKAF trades at $2.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.61, whereas ILKAF's P/E ratio is 7.68. In terms of profitability, APHLF's ROE is -0.25%, compared to ILKAF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, APHLF is more volatile compared to ILKAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APHLF.
APHLF vs AZRMF Comparison
APHLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APHLF stands at 207.8M. In comparison, AZRMF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, APHLF is priced at $1.10, while AZRMF trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.61, whereas AZRMF's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, APHLF's ROE is -0.25%, compared to AZRMF's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, APHLF is more volatile compared to AZRMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APHLF.
APHLF vs AUSDF Comparison
APHLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APHLF stands at 207.8M. In comparison, AUSDF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, APHLF is priced at $1.10, while AUSDF trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.61, whereas AUSDF's P/E ratio is 19.67. In terms of profitability, APHLF's ROE is -0.25%, compared to AUSDF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, APHLF is more volatile compared to AUSDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APHLF.
APHLF vs ILKAY Comparison
APHLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APHLF stands at 207.8M. In comparison, ILKAY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, APHLF is priced at $1.10, while ILKAY trades at $12.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.61, whereas ILKAY's P/E ratio is 7.39. In terms of profitability, APHLF's ROE is -0.25%, compared to ILKAY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, APHLF is less volatile compared to ILKAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APHLF.
APHLF vs MFRVF Comparison
APHLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APHLF stands at 207.8M. In comparison, MFRVF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, APHLF is priced at $1.10, while MFRVF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.61, whereas MFRVF's P/E ratio is -18.00. In terms of profitability, APHLF's ROE is -0.25%, compared to MFRVF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, APHLF is less volatile compared to MFRVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APHLF.
APHLF vs BQSSF Comparison
APHLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APHLF stands at 207.8M. In comparison, BQSSF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, APHLF is priced at $1.10, while BQSSF trades at $2.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.61, whereas BQSSF's P/E ratio is -64.75. In terms of profitability, APHLF's ROE is -0.25%, compared to BQSSF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, APHLF is less volatile compared to BQSSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APHLF.
APHLF vs FMCXF Comparison
APHLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APHLF stands at 207.8M. In comparison, FMCXF has a market cap of 999.6M. Regarding current trading prices, APHLF is priced at $1.10, while FMCXF trades at $2.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.61, whereas FMCXF's P/E ratio is -59.25. In terms of profitability, APHLF's ROE is -0.25%, compared to FMCXF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, APHLF is less volatile compared to FMCXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APHLF.
APHLF vs LINRF Comparison
APHLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APHLF stands at 207.8M. In comparison, LINRF has a market cap of 980M. Regarding current trading prices, APHLF is priced at $1.10, while LINRF trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.61, whereas LINRF's P/E ratio is -40.37. In terms of profitability, APHLF's ROE is -0.25%, compared to LINRF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, APHLF is less volatile compared to LINRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APHLF.
APHLF vs ATUSF Comparison
APHLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APHLF stands at 207.8M. In comparison, ATUSF has a market cap of 923.7M. Regarding current trading prices, APHLF is priced at $1.10, while ATUSF trades at $19.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.61, whereas ATUSF's P/E ratio is 12.71. In terms of profitability, APHLF's ROE is -0.25%, compared to ATUSF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, APHLF is more volatile compared to ATUSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APHLF.
APHLF vs STTSY Comparison
APHLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APHLF stands at 207.8M. In comparison, STTSY has a market cap of 918.4M. Regarding current trading prices, APHLF is priced at $1.10, while STTSY trades at $20.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.61, whereas STTSY's P/E ratio is 5.82. In terms of profitability, APHLF's ROE is -0.25%, compared to STTSY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, APHLF is less volatile compared to STTSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APHLF.
APHLF vs TAOFF Comparison
APHLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APHLF stands at 207.8M. In comparison, TAOFF has a market cap of 903.2M. Regarding current trading prices, APHLF is priced at $1.10, while TAOFF trades at $2.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.61, whereas TAOFF's P/E ratio is -23.58. In terms of profitability, APHLF's ROE is -0.25%, compared to TAOFF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, APHLF is more volatile compared to TAOFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APHLF.
APHLF vs AFMJF Comparison
APHLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APHLF stands at 207.8M. In comparison, AFMJF has a market cap of 781.7M. Regarding current trading prices, APHLF is priced at $1.10, while AFMJF trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.61, whereas AFMJF's P/E ratio is 7.66. In terms of profitability, APHLF's ROE is -0.25%, compared to AFMJF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, APHLF is less volatile compared to AFMJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APHLF.
APHLF vs AMVMF Comparison
APHLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APHLF stands at 207.8M. In comparison, AMVMF has a market cap of 699M. Regarding current trading prices, APHLF is priced at $1.10, while AMVMF trades at $21.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.61, whereas AMVMF's P/E ratio is -57.00. In terms of profitability, APHLF's ROE is -0.25%, compared to AMVMF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, APHLF is more volatile compared to AMVMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APHLF.
APHLF vs ALMTF Comparison
APHLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APHLF stands at 207.8M. In comparison, ALMTF has a market cap of 669.5M. Regarding current trading prices, APHLF is priced at $1.10, while ALMTF trades at $2.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.61, whereas ALMTF's P/E ratio is -19.36. In terms of profitability, APHLF's ROE is -0.25%, compared to ALMTF's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, APHLF is less volatile compared to ALMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APHLF.
APHLF vs CTJHF Comparison
APHLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APHLF stands at 207.8M. In comparison, CTJHF has a market cap of 596.4M. Regarding current trading prices, APHLF is priced at $1.10, while CTJHF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.61, whereas CTJHF's P/E ratio is 7.59. In terms of profitability, APHLF's ROE is -0.25%, compared to CTJHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, APHLF is less volatile compared to CTJHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APHLF.
APHLF vs PXMFF Comparison
APHLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APHLF stands at 207.8M. In comparison, PXMFF has a market cap of 554.6M. Regarding current trading prices, APHLF is priced at $1.10, while PXMFF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.61, whereas PXMFF's P/E ratio is 4.80. In terms of profitability, APHLF's ROE is -0.25%, compared to PXMFF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, APHLF is less volatile compared to PXMFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APHLF.
APHLF vs VULNF Comparison
APHLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APHLF stands at 207.8M. In comparison, VULNF has a market cap of 537.9M. Regarding current trading prices, APHLF is priced at $1.10, while VULNF trades at $2.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.61, whereas VULNF's P/E ratio is -9.46. In terms of profitability, APHLF's ROE is -0.25%, compared to VULNF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, APHLF is less volatile compared to VULNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APHLF.
APHLF vs MJDLF Comparison
APHLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APHLF stands at 207.8M. In comparison, MJDLF has a market cap of 504.2M. Regarding current trading prices, APHLF is priced at $1.10, while MJDLF trades at $6.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.61, whereas MJDLF's P/E ratio is 19.87. In terms of profitability, APHLF's ROE is -0.25%, compared to MJDLF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, APHLF is less volatile compared to MJDLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APHLF.
APHLF vs JMXXF Comparison
APHLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APHLF stands at 207.8M. In comparison, JMXXF has a market cap of 495.2M. Regarding current trading prices, APHLF is priced at $1.10, while JMXXF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.61, whereas JMXXF's P/E ratio is 25.25. In terms of profitability, APHLF's ROE is -0.25%, compared to JMXXF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, APHLF is less volatile compared to JMXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APHLF.
APHLF vs TTNNF Comparison
APHLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APHLF stands at 207.8M. In comparison, TTNNF has a market cap of 492.1M. Regarding current trading prices, APHLF is priced at $1.10, while TTNNF trades at $6.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.61, whereas TTNNF's P/E ratio is 13.83. In terms of profitability, APHLF's ROE is -0.25%, compared to TTNNF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, APHLF is less volatile compared to TTNNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APHLF.
APHLF vs OSTTF Comparison
APHLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APHLF stands at 207.8M. In comparison, OSTTF has a market cap of 490.2M. Regarding current trading prices, APHLF is priced at $1.10, while OSTTF trades at $13.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.61, whereas OSTTF's P/E ratio is 10.02. In terms of profitability, APHLF's ROE is -0.25%, compared to OSTTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, APHLF is less volatile compared to OSTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APHLF.
APHLF vs PKREF Comparison
APHLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APHLF stands at 207.8M. In comparison, PKREF has a market cap of 484M. Regarding current trading prices, APHLF is priced at $1.10, while PKREF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.61, whereas PKREF's P/E ratio is -18.68. In terms of profitability, APHLF's ROE is -0.25%, compared to PKREF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, APHLF is less volatile compared to PKREF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APHLF.
APHLF vs MCRZF Comparison
APHLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APHLF stands at 207.8M. In comparison, MCRZF has a market cap of 466.5M. Regarding current trading prices, APHLF is priced at $1.10, while MCRZF trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.61, whereas MCRZF's P/E ratio is -12.29. In terms of profitability, APHLF's ROE is -0.25%, compared to MCRZF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, APHLF is less volatile compared to MCRZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APHLF.
APHLF vs MCHHF Comparison
APHLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APHLF stands at 207.8M. In comparison, MCHHF has a market cap of 443.4M. Regarding current trading prices, APHLF is priced at $1.10, while MCHHF trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.61, whereas MCHHF's P/E ratio is 21.00. In terms of profitability, APHLF's ROE is -0.25%, compared to MCHHF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, APHLF is more volatile compared to MCHHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APHLF.
APHLF vs BIRNF Comparison
APHLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APHLF stands at 207.8M. In comparison, BIRNF has a market cap of 433.1M. Regarding current trading prices, APHLF is priced at $1.10, while BIRNF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.61, whereas BIRNF's P/E ratio is -7.50. In terms of profitability, APHLF's ROE is -0.25%, compared to BIRNF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, APHLF is less volatile compared to BIRNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APHLF.
APHLF vs FGOVF Comparison
APHLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APHLF stands at 207.8M. In comparison, FGOVF has a market cap of 432.3M. Regarding current trading prices, APHLF is priced at $1.10, while FGOVF trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.61, whereas FGOVF's P/E ratio is -81.72. In terms of profitability, APHLF's ROE is -0.25%, compared to FGOVF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, APHLF is less volatile compared to FGOVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APHLF.
APHLF vs MNXMF Comparison
APHLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APHLF stands at 207.8M. In comparison, MNXMF has a market cap of 410.3M. Regarding current trading prices, APHLF is priced at $1.10, while MNXMF trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.61, whereas MNXMF's P/E ratio is -71.43. In terms of profitability, APHLF's ROE is -0.25%, compared to MNXMF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, APHLF is less volatile compared to MNXMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APHLF.
APHLF vs REEMF Comparison
APHLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APHLF stands at 207.8M. In comparison, REEMF has a market cap of 402.6M. Regarding current trading prices, APHLF is priced at $1.10, while REEMF trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.61, whereas REEMF's P/E ratio is -26.00. In terms of profitability, APHLF's ROE is -0.25%, compared to REEMF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, APHLF is less volatile compared to REEMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APHLF.
APHLF vs NQMIY Comparison
APHLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APHLF stands at 207.8M. In comparison, NQMIY has a market cap of 380.4M. Regarding current trading prices, APHLF is priced at $1.10, while NQMIY trades at $70.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.61, whereas NQMIY's P/E ratio is -4.80. In terms of profitability, APHLF's ROE is -0.25%, compared to NQMIY's ROE of +0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, APHLF is more volatile compared to NQMIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APHLF.
APHLF vs AUMTF Comparison
APHLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APHLF stands at 207.8M. In comparison, AUMTF has a market cap of 372.4M. Regarding current trading prices, APHLF is priced at $1.10, while AUMTF trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.61, whereas AUMTF's P/E ratio is 22.00. In terms of profitability, APHLF's ROE is -0.25%, compared to AUMTF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, APHLF is more volatile compared to AUMTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APHLF.
APHLF vs CTJHY Comparison
APHLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APHLF stands at 207.8M. In comparison, CTJHY has a market cap of 353.6M. Regarding current trading prices, APHLF is priced at $1.10, while CTJHY trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.61, whereas CTJHY's P/E ratio is 4.84. In terms of profitability, APHLF's ROE is -0.25%, compared to CTJHY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, APHLF is more volatile compared to CTJHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APHLF.
APHLF vs CGMLF Comparison
APHLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APHLF stands at 207.8M. In comparison, CGMLF has a market cap of 346.2M. Regarding current trading prices, APHLF is priced at $1.10, while CGMLF trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.61, whereas CGMLF's P/E ratio is -22.25. In terms of profitability, APHLF's ROE is -0.25%, compared to CGMLF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, APHLF is less volatile compared to CGMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APHLF.
APHLF vs FWEDF Comparison
APHLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APHLF stands at 207.8M. In comparison, FWEDF has a market cap of 343.3M. Regarding current trading prices, APHLF is priced at $1.10, while FWEDF trades at $1.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.61, whereas FWEDF's P/E ratio is -11.13. In terms of profitability, APHLF's ROE is -0.25%, compared to FWEDF's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, APHLF is less volatile compared to FWEDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APHLF.
APHLF vs ERLFF Comparison
APHLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APHLF stands at 207.8M. In comparison, ERLFF has a market cap of 338.1M. Regarding current trading prices, APHLF is priced at $1.10, while ERLFF trades at $1.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.61, whereas ERLFF's P/E ratio is -32.60. In terms of profitability, APHLF's ROE is -0.25%, compared to ERLFF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, APHLF and ERLFF have similar daily volatility (1.82).
APHLF vs KMRPF Comparison
APHLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APHLF stands at 207.8M. In comparison, KMRPF has a market cap of 335.2M. Regarding current trading prices, APHLF is priced at $1.10, while KMRPF trades at $3.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.61, whereas KMRPF's P/E ratio is 5.34. In terms of profitability, APHLF's ROE is -0.25%, compared to KMRPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, APHLF is less volatile compared to KMRPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APHLF.
APHLF vs MLYF Comparison
APHLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APHLF stands at 207.8M. In comparison, MLYF has a market cap of 332.6M. Regarding current trading prices, APHLF is priced at $1.10, while MLYF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.61, whereas MLYF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APHLF's ROE is -0.25%, compared to MLYF's ROE of +5.32%. Regarding short-term risk, APHLF is less volatile compared to MLYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APHLF.
APHLF vs ARAFF Comparison
APHLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APHLF stands at 207.8M. In comparison, ARAFF has a market cap of 305.6M. Regarding current trading prices, APHLF is priced at $1.10, while ARAFF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.61, whereas ARAFF's P/E ratio is -12.40. In terms of profitability, APHLF's ROE is -0.25%, compared to ARAFF's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, APHLF is less volatile compared to ARAFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APHLF.
APHLF vs MLXEF Comparison
APHLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APHLF stands at 207.8M. In comparison, MLXEF has a market cap of 297.8M. Regarding current trading prices, APHLF is priced at $1.10, while MLXEF trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.61, whereas MLXEF's P/E ratio is 4.80. In terms of profitability, APHLF's ROE is -0.25%, compared to MLXEF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, APHLF is more volatile compared to MLXEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APHLF.
APHLF vs SVMLF Comparison
APHLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APHLF stands at 207.8M. In comparison, SVMLF has a market cap of 284.7M. Regarding current trading prices, APHLF is priced at $1.10, while SVMLF trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.61, whereas SVMLF's P/E ratio is -14.67. In terms of profitability, APHLF's ROE is -0.25%, compared to SVMLF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, APHLF is less volatile compared to SVMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APHLF.
APHLF vs LTSRF Comparison
APHLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APHLF stands at 207.8M. In comparison, LTSRF has a market cap of 284.4M. Regarding current trading prices, APHLF is priced at $1.10, while LTSRF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.61, whereas LTSRF's P/E ratio is -12.00. In terms of profitability, APHLF's ROE is -0.25%, compared to LTSRF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, APHLF is more volatile compared to LTSRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APHLF.
APHLF vs SLGGF Comparison
APHLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APHLF stands at 207.8M. In comparison, SLGGF has a market cap of 282.1M. Regarding current trading prices, APHLF is priced at $1.10, while SLGGF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.61, whereas SLGGF's P/E ratio is -4.70. In terms of profitability, APHLF's ROE is -0.25%, compared to SLGGF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, APHLF is less volatile compared to SLGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APHLF.
APHLF vs ERDCF Comparison
APHLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APHLF stands at 207.8M. In comparison, ERDCF has a market cap of 273.1M. Regarding current trading prices, APHLF is priced at $1.10, while ERDCF trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.61, whereas ERDCF's P/E ratio is -74.89. In terms of profitability, APHLF's ROE is -0.25%, compared to ERDCF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, APHLF is less volatile compared to ERDCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APHLF.
APHLF vs PMETF Comparison
APHLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APHLF stands at 207.8M. In comparison, PMETF has a market cap of 264.5M. Regarding current trading prices, APHLF is priced at $1.10, while PMETF trades at $1.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.61, whereas PMETF's P/E ratio is -54.33. In terms of profitability, APHLF's ROE is -0.25%, compared to PMETF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, APHLF is less volatile compared to PMETF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APHLF.
APHLF vs LRSRF Comparison
APHLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APHLF stands at 207.8M. In comparison, LRSRF has a market cap of 260.5M. Regarding current trading prices, APHLF is priced at $1.10, while LRSRF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.61, whereas LRSRF's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, APHLF's ROE is -0.25%, compared to LRSRF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, APHLF is less volatile compared to LRSRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APHLF.
APHLF vs STQNF Comparison
APHLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APHLF stands at 207.8M. In comparison, STQNF has a market cap of 251.6M. Regarding current trading prices, APHLF is priced at $1.10, while STQNF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.61, whereas STQNF's P/E ratio is -17.20. In terms of profitability, APHLF's ROE is -0.25%, compared to STQNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, APHLF is more volatile compared to STQNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APHLF.
APHLF vs MMILF Comparison
APHLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APHLF stands at 207.8M. In comparison, MMILF has a market cap of 243.9M. Regarding current trading prices, APHLF is priced at $1.10, while MMILF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.61, whereas MMILF's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, APHLF's ROE is -0.25%, compared to MMILF's ROE of -2.12%. Regarding short-term risk, APHLF is more volatile compared to MMILF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APHLF.
APHLF vs RXRLF Comparison
APHLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APHLF stands at 207.8M. In comparison, RXRLF has a market cap of 238.7M. Regarding current trading prices, APHLF is priced at $1.10, while RXRLF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.61, whereas RXRLF's P/E ratio is -29.90. In terms of profitability, APHLF's ROE is -0.25%, compared to RXRLF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, APHLF is less volatile compared to RXRLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APHLF.
APHLF vs MGMNF Comparison
APHLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APHLF stands at 207.8M. In comparison, MGMNF has a market cap of 238.2M. Regarding current trading prices, APHLF is priced at $1.10, while MGMNF trades at $1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.61, whereas MGMNF's P/E ratio is 24.16. In terms of profitability, APHLF's ROE is -0.25%, compared to MGMNF's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, APHLF is less volatile compared to MGMNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APHLF.
APHLF vs LTHHF Comparison
APHLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APHLF stands at 207.8M. In comparison, LTHHF has a market cap of 238.1M. Regarding current trading prices, APHLF is priced at $1.10, while LTHHF trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.61, whereas LTHHF's P/E ratio is -16.02. In terms of profitability, APHLF's ROE is -0.25%, compared to LTHHF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, APHLF is more volatile compared to LTHHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APHLF.
APHLF vs BSRUF Comparison
APHLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APHLF stands at 207.8M. In comparison, BSRUF has a market cap of 237.8M. Regarding current trading prices, APHLF is priced at $1.10, while BSRUF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.61, whereas BSRUF's P/E ratio is -5.09. In terms of profitability, APHLF's ROE is -0.25%, compared to BSRUF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, APHLF is less volatile compared to BSRUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APHLF.