Amundi S.A.
Amundi S.A. AMUN.PA Peers
See (AMUN.PA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMUN.PA | $74.20 | +1.57% | 15.09B | 11.65 | $6.37 | +5.53% |
| IWDA.AS | $99.45 | +3.29% | 90.95B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| VUSA.AS | $99.12 | +3.90% | 58.04B | N/A | N/A | +1.10% |
| VWRL.AS | $127.46 | +3.30% | 34.02B | N/A | N/A | +1.59% |
| IUSA.AS | $52.09 | +3.94% | 16.13B | N/A | N/A | +1.09% |
| ISFA.AS | $10.06 | +1.21% | 14.80B | N/A | N/A | +3.49% |
| HAL.AS | $118.00 | -0.34% | 10.66B | 8.81 | $13.39 | +2.42% |
| PSH.AS | $51.60 | N/A | 9.41B | 4.41 | $11.69 | +1.17% |
| IMEU.AS | $34.30 | +1.40% | 8.95B | 17.66 | $1.94 | +2.66% |
| MEUD.PA | $258.85 | +1.33% | 8.95B | 17.05 | $15.18 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
AMUN.PA vs IWDA.AS Comparison
AMUN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMUN.PA stands at 15.09B. In comparison, IWDA.AS has a market cap of 90.95B. Regarding current trading prices, AMUN.PA is priced at $74.20, while IWDA.AS trades at $99.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMUN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas IWDA.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMUN.PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IWDA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMUN.PA is more volatile compared to IWDA.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMUN.PA.
AMUN.PA vs VUSA.AS Comparison
AMUN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMUN.PA stands at 15.09B. In comparison, VUSA.AS has a market cap of 58.04B. Regarding current trading prices, AMUN.PA is priced at $74.20, while VUSA.AS trades at $99.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMUN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas VUSA.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMUN.PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VUSA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMUN.PA is more volatile compared to VUSA.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMUN.PA.
AMUN.PA vs VWRL.AS Comparison
AMUN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMUN.PA stands at 15.09B. In comparison, VWRL.AS has a market cap of 34.02B. Regarding current trading prices, AMUN.PA is priced at $74.20, while VWRL.AS trades at $127.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMUN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas VWRL.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMUN.PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VWRL.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMUN.PA is more volatile compared to VWRL.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMUN.PA.
AMUN.PA vs IUSA.AS Comparison
AMUN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMUN.PA stands at 15.09B. In comparison, IUSA.AS has a market cap of 16.13B. Regarding current trading prices, AMUN.PA is priced at $74.20, while IUSA.AS trades at $52.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMUN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas IUSA.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMUN.PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IUSA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMUN.PA is more volatile compared to IUSA.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMUN.PA.
AMUN.PA vs ISFA.AS Comparison
AMUN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMUN.PA stands at 15.09B. In comparison, ISFA.AS has a market cap of 14.80B. Regarding current trading prices, AMUN.PA is priced at $74.20, while ISFA.AS trades at $10.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMUN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas ISFA.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMUN.PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ISFA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMUN.PA is more volatile compared to ISFA.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMUN.PA.
AMUN.PA vs HAL.AS Comparison
AMUN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMUN.PA stands at 15.09B. In comparison, HAL.AS has a market cap of 10.66B. Regarding current trading prices, AMUN.PA is priced at $74.20, while HAL.AS trades at $118.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMUN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas HAL.AS's P/E ratio is 8.81. In terms of profitability, AMUN.PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HAL.AS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AMUN.PA is more volatile compared to HAL.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMUN.PA.
AMUN.PA vs PSH.AS Comparison
AMUN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMUN.PA stands at 15.09B. In comparison, PSH.AS has a market cap of 9.41B. Regarding current trading prices, AMUN.PA is priced at $74.20, while PSH.AS trades at $51.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMUN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas PSH.AS's P/E ratio is 4.41. In terms of profitability, AMUN.PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PSH.AS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AMUN.PA is less volatile compared to PSH.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMUN.PA.
AMUN.PA vs IMEU.AS Comparison
AMUN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMUN.PA stands at 15.09B. In comparison, IMEU.AS has a market cap of 8.95B. Regarding current trading prices, AMUN.PA is priced at $74.20, while IMEU.AS trades at $34.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMUN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas IMEU.AS's P/E ratio is 17.66. In terms of profitability, AMUN.PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IMEU.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMUN.PA is more volatile compared to IMEU.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMUN.PA.
AMUN.PA vs MEUD.PA Comparison
AMUN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMUN.PA stands at 15.09B. In comparison, MEUD.PA has a market cap of 8.95B. Regarding current trading prices, AMUN.PA is priced at $74.20, while MEUD.PA trades at $258.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMUN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas MEUD.PA's P/E ratio is 17.05. In terms of profitability, AMUN.PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MEUD.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AMUN.PA is more volatile compared to MEUD.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMUN.PA.
AMUN.PA vs GBLB.BR Comparison
AMUN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMUN.PA stands at 15.09B. In comparison, GBLB.BR has a market cap of 8.58B. Regarding current trading prices, AMUN.PA is priced at $74.20, while GBLB.BR trades at $71.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMUN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas GBLB.BR's P/E ratio is 237.67. In terms of profitability, AMUN.PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GBLB.BR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AMUN.PA is more volatile compared to GBLB.BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMUN.PA.
AMUN.PA vs SOF.BR Comparison
AMUN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMUN.PA stands at 15.09B. In comparison, SOF.BR has a market cap of 8.33B. Regarding current trading prices, AMUN.PA is priced at $74.20, while SOF.BR trades at $252.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMUN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas SOF.BR's P/E ratio is 6.29. In terms of profitability, AMUN.PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SOF.BR's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AMUN.PA is more volatile compared to SOF.BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMUN.PA.
AMUN.PA vs I500.AS Comparison
AMUN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMUN.PA stands at 15.09B. In comparison, I500.AS has a market cap of 7.10B. Regarding current trading prices, AMUN.PA is priced at $74.20, while I500.AS trades at $9.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMUN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas I500.AS's P/E ratio is 25.80. In terms of profitability, AMUN.PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to I500.AS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AMUN.PA is more volatile compared to I500.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMUN.PA.
AMUN.PA vs I50D.AS Comparison
AMUN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMUN.PA stands at 15.09B. In comparison, I50D.AS has a market cap of 7.01B. Regarding current trading prices, AMUN.PA is priced at $74.20, while I50D.AS trades at $6.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMUN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas I50D.AS's P/E ratio is 25.91. In terms of profitability, AMUN.PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to I50D.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMUN.PA is more volatile compared to I50D.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMUN.PA.
AMUN.PA vs LCWD.PA Comparison
AMUN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMUN.PA stands at 15.09B. In comparison, LCWD.PA has a market cap of 6.97B. Regarding current trading prices, AMUN.PA is priced at $74.20, while LCWD.PA trades at $19.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMUN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas LCWD.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMUN.PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LCWD.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AMUN.PA is more volatile compared to LCWD.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMUN.PA.
AMUN.PA vs IWRD.AS Comparison
AMUN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMUN.PA stands at 15.09B. In comparison, IWRD.AS has a market cap of 6.79B. Regarding current trading prices, AMUN.PA is priced at $74.20, while IWRD.AS trades at $72.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMUN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas IWRD.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMUN.PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IWRD.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMUN.PA is more volatile compared to IWRD.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMUN.PA.
AMUN.PA vs WLD.PA Comparison
AMUN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMUN.PA stands at 15.09B. In comparison, WLD.PA has a market cap of 6.67B. Regarding current trading prices, AMUN.PA is priced at $74.20, while WLD.PA trades at $339.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMUN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas WLD.PA's P/E ratio is 22.27. In terms of profitability, AMUN.PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WLD.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMUN.PA is more volatile compared to WLD.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMUN.PA.
AMUN.PA vs CC4.PA Comparison
AMUN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMUN.PA stands at 15.09B. In comparison, CC4.PA has a market cap of 6.19B. Regarding current trading prices, AMUN.PA is priced at $74.20, while CC4.PA trades at $221.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMUN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas CC4.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMUN.PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CC4.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMUN.PA is more volatile compared to CC4.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMUN.PA.
AMUN.PA vs VHYL.AS Comparison
AMUN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMUN.PA stands at 15.09B. In comparison, VHYL.AS has a market cap of 5.97B. Regarding current trading prices, AMUN.PA is priced at $74.20, while VHYL.AS trades at $64.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMUN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas VHYL.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMUN.PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VHYL.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMUN.PA is more volatile compared to VHYL.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMUN.PA.
AMUN.PA vs PHAU.AS Comparison
AMUN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMUN.PA stands at 15.09B. In comparison, PHAU.AS has a market cap of 5.81B. Regarding current trading prices, AMUN.PA is priced at $74.20, while PHAU.AS trades at $271.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMUN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas PHAU.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMUN.PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PHAU.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMUN.PA is more volatile compared to PHAU.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMUN.PA.
AMUN.PA vs 500.PA Comparison
AMUN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMUN.PA stands at 15.09B. In comparison, 500.PA has a market cap of 5.76B. Regarding current trading prices, AMUN.PA is priced at $74.20, while 500.PA trades at $103.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMUN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas 500.PA's P/E ratio is 25.08. In terms of profitability, AMUN.PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 500.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMUN.PA is more volatile compared to 500.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMUN.PA.
AMUN.PA vs AEME.PA Comparison
AMUN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMUN.PA stands at 15.09B. In comparison, AEME.PA has a market cap of 5.71B. Regarding current trading prices, AMUN.PA is priced at $74.20, while AEME.PA trades at $69.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMUN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas AEME.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMUN.PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AEME.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMUN.PA is more volatile compared to AEME.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMUN.PA.
AMUN.PA vs GOLD.PA Comparison
AMUN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMUN.PA stands at 15.09B. In comparison, GOLD.PA has a market cap of 5.69B. Regarding current trading prices, AMUN.PA is priced at $74.20, while GOLD.PA trades at $115.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMUN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas GOLD.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMUN.PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GOLD.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMUN.PA is more volatile compared to GOLD.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMUN.PA.
AMUN.PA vs CW8.PA Comparison
AMUN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMUN.PA stands at 15.09B. In comparison, CW8.PA has a market cap of 5.36B. Regarding current trading prices, AMUN.PA is priced at $74.20, while CW8.PA trades at $543.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMUN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas CW8.PA's P/E ratio is 22.26. In terms of profitability, AMUN.PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CW8.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMUN.PA is more volatile compared to CW8.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMUN.PA.
AMUN.PA vs IJPA.AS Comparison
AMUN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMUN.PA stands at 15.09B. In comparison, IJPA.AS has a market cap of 5.10B. Regarding current trading prices, AMUN.PA is priced at $74.20, while IJPA.AS trades at $53.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMUN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas IJPA.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMUN.PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IJPA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMUN.PA is more volatile compared to IJPA.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMUN.PA.
AMUN.PA vs S500H.PA Comparison
AMUN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMUN.PA stands at 15.09B. In comparison, S500H.PA has a market cap of 5.07B. Regarding current trading prices, AMUN.PA is priced at $74.20, while S500H.PA trades at $81.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMUN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas S500H.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMUN.PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to S500H.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMUN.PA is more volatile compared to S500H.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMUN.PA.
AMUN.PA vs S500.PA Comparison
AMUN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMUN.PA stands at 15.09B. In comparison, S500.PA has a market cap of 4.84B. Regarding current trading prices, AMUN.PA is priced at $74.20, while S500.PA trades at $147.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMUN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas S500.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMUN.PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to S500.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMUN.PA is more volatile compared to S500.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMUN.PA.
AMUN.PA vs VEUR.AS Comparison
AMUN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMUN.PA stands at 15.09B. In comparison, VEUR.AS has a market cap of 4.82B. Regarding current trading prices, AMUN.PA is priced at $74.20, while VEUR.AS trades at $42.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMUN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas VEUR.AS's P/E ratio is 17.10. In terms of profitability, AMUN.PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VEUR.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMUN.PA is more volatile compared to VEUR.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMUN.PA.
AMUN.PA vs USAC.PA Comparison
AMUN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMUN.PA stands at 15.09B. In comparison, USAC.PA has a market cap of 4.77B. Regarding current trading prices, AMUN.PA is priced at $74.20, while USAC.PA trades at $529.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMUN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas USAC.PA's P/E ratio is 31.29. In terms of profitability, AMUN.PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to USAC.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMUN.PA is more volatile compared to USAC.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMUN.PA.
AMUN.PA vs RF.PA Comparison
AMUN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMUN.PA stands at 15.09B. In comparison, RF.PA has a market cap of 4.76B. Regarding current trading prices, AMUN.PA is priced at $74.20, while RF.PA trades at $68.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMUN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas RF.PA's P/E ratio is -80.82. In terms of profitability, AMUN.PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RF.PA's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AMUN.PA is less volatile compared to RF.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMUN.PA.
AMUN.PA vs ECRP.PA Comparison
AMUN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMUN.PA stands at 15.09B. In comparison, ECRP.PA has a market cap of 4.75B. Regarding current trading prices, AMUN.PA is priced at $74.20, while ECRP.PA trades at $52.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMUN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas ECRP.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMUN.PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ECRP.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMUN.PA is more volatile compared to ECRP.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMUN.PA.
AMUN.PA vs SP5C.PA Comparison
AMUN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMUN.PA stands at 15.09B. In comparison, SP5C.PA has a market cap of 4.72B. Regarding current trading prices, AMUN.PA is priced at $74.20, while SP5C.PA trades at $374.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMUN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas SP5C.PA's P/E ratio is 25.08. In terms of profitability, AMUN.PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SP5C.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMUN.PA is more volatile compared to SP5C.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMUN.PA.
AMUN.PA vs USA.PA Comparison
AMUN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMUN.PA stands at 15.09B. In comparison, USA.PA has a market cap of 4.70B. Regarding current trading prices, AMUN.PA is priced at $74.20, while USA.PA trades at $488.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMUN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas USA.PA's P/E ratio is 30.68. In terms of profitability, AMUN.PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to USA.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AMUN.PA is more volatile compared to USA.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMUN.PA.
AMUN.PA vs KBCA.BR Comparison
AMUN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMUN.PA stands at 15.09B. In comparison, KBCA.BR has a market cap of 4.64B. Regarding current trading prices, AMUN.PA is priced at $74.20, while KBCA.BR trades at $60.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMUN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas KBCA.BR's P/E ratio is 12.59. In terms of profitability, AMUN.PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KBCA.BR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMUN.PA is more volatile compared to KBCA.BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMUN.PA.
AMUN.PA vs EUEA.AS Comparison
AMUN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMUN.PA stands at 15.09B. In comparison, EUEA.AS has a market cap of 4.50B. Regarding current trading prices, AMUN.PA is priced at $74.20, while EUEA.AS trades at $55.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMUN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas EUEA.AS's P/E ratio is 17.12. In terms of profitability, AMUN.PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EUEA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMUN.PA is more volatile compared to EUEA.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMUN.PA.
AMUN.PA vs IEMM.AS Comparison
AMUN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMUN.PA stands at 15.09B. In comparison, IEMM.AS has a market cap of 4.43B. Regarding current trading prices, AMUN.PA is priced at $74.20, while IEMM.AS trades at $40.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMUN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas IEMM.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMUN.PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IEMM.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMUN.PA is more volatile compared to IEMM.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMUN.PA.
AMUN.PA vs 500X.AS Comparison
AMUN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMUN.PA stands at 15.09B. In comparison, 500X.AS has a market cap of 4.37B. Regarding current trading prices, AMUN.PA is priced at $74.20, while 500X.AS trades at $36.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMUN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas 500X.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMUN.PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 500X.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMUN.PA is more volatile compared to 500X.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMUN.PA.
AMUN.PA vs ICHN.AS Comparison
AMUN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMUN.PA stands at 15.09B. In comparison, ICHN.AS has a market cap of 4.34B. Regarding current trading prices, AMUN.PA is priced at $74.20, while ICHN.AS trades at $5.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMUN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas ICHN.AS's P/E ratio is 12.95. In terms of profitability, AMUN.PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ICHN.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMUN.PA is more volatile compared to ICHN.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMUN.PA.
AMUN.PA vs ICHD.AS Comparison
AMUN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMUN.PA stands at 15.09B. In comparison, ICHD.AS has a market cap of 4.33B. Regarding current trading prices, AMUN.PA is priced at $74.20, while ICHD.AS trades at $4.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMUN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas ICHD.AS's P/E ratio is 12.93. In terms of profitability, AMUN.PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ICHD.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMUN.PA is more volatile compared to ICHD.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMUN.PA.
AMUN.PA vs CAC.PA Comparison
AMUN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMUN.PA stands at 15.09B. In comparison, CAC.PA has a market cap of 4.18B. Regarding current trading prices, AMUN.PA is priced at $74.20, while CAC.PA trades at $78.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMUN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas CAC.PA's P/E ratio is 17.17. In terms of profitability, AMUN.PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CAC.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMUN.PA is more volatile compared to CAC.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMUN.PA.
AMUN.PA vs REINA.AS Comparison
AMUN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMUN.PA stands at 15.09B. In comparison, REINA.AS has a market cap of 4.14B. Regarding current trading prices, AMUN.PA is priced at $74.20, while REINA.AS trades at $22.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMUN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas REINA.AS's P/E ratio is 3.99. In terms of profitability, AMUN.PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to REINA.AS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AMUN.PA is less volatile compared to REINA.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMUN.PA.
AMUN.PA vs CACC.PA Comparison
AMUN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMUN.PA stands at 15.09B. In comparison, CACC.PA has a market cap of 4.12B. Regarding current trading prices, AMUN.PA is priced at $74.20, while CACC.PA trades at $38.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMUN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas CACC.PA's P/E ratio is 17.19. In terms of profitability, AMUN.PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CACC.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AMUN.PA is more volatile compared to CACC.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMUN.PA.
AMUN.PA vs WSRI.PA Comparison
AMUN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMUN.PA stands at 15.09B. In comparison, WSRI.PA has a market cap of 3.98B. Regarding current trading prices, AMUN.PA is priced at $74.20, while WSRI.PA trades at $103.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMUN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas WSRI.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMUN.PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WSRI.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMUN.PA is more volatile compared to WSRI.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMUN.PA.
AMUN.PA vs C50U.PA Comparison
AMUN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMUN.PA stands at 15.09B. In comparison, C50U.PA has a market cap of 3.94B. Regarding current trading prices, AMUN.PA is priced at $74.20, while C50U.PA trades at $155.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMUN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas C50U.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMUN.PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to C50U.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMUN.PA is more volatile compared to C50U.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMUN.PA.
AMUN.PA vs MF.PA Comparison
AMUN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMUN.PA stands at 15.09B. In comparison, MF.PA has a market cap of 3.79B. Regarding current trading prices, AMUN.PA is priced at $74.20, while MF.PA trades at $89.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMUN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas MF.PA's P/E ratio is -30.49. In terms of profitability, AMUN.PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MF.PA's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AMUN.PA is more volatile compared to MF.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMUN.PA.
AMUN.PA vs AUEM.PA Comparison
AMUN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMUN.PA stands at 15.09B. In comparison, AUEM.PA has a market cap of 3.66B. Regarding current trading prices, AMUN.PA is priced at $74.20, while AUEM.PA trades at $5.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMUN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas AUEM.PA's P/E ratio is 13.16. In terms of profitability, AMUN.PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AUEM.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMUN.PA is more volatile compared to AUEM.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMUN.PA.
AMUN.PA vs C50.PA Comparison
AMUN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMUN.PA stands at 15.09B. In comparison, C50.PA has a market cap of 3.55B. Regarding current trading prices, AMUN.PA is priced at $74.20, while C50.PA trades at $139.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMUN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas C50.PA's P/E ratio is 16.72. In terms of profitability, AMUN.PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to C50.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMUN.PA is more volatile compared to C50.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMUN.PA.
AMUN.PA vs CD5.PA Comparison
AMUN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMUN.PA stands at 15.09B. In comparison, CD5.PA has a market cap of 3.55B. Regarding current trading prices, AMUN.PA is priced at $74.20, while CD5.PA trades at $86.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMUN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas CD5.PA's P/E ratio is 16.74. In terms of profitability, AMUN.PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CD5.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMUN.PA is more volatile compared to CD5.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMUN.PA.
AMUN.PA vs VERX.AS Comparison
AMUN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMUN.PA stands at 15.09B. In comparison, VERX.AS has a market cap of 3.44B. Regarding current trading prices, AMUN.PA is priced at $74.20, while VERX.AS trades at $43.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMUN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas VERX.AS's P/E ratio is 16.99. In terms of profitability, AMUN.PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VERX.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMUN.PA is more volatile compared to VERX.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMUN.PA.
AMUN.PA vs ROLA.AS Comparison
AMUN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMUN.PA stands at 15.09B. In comparison, ROLA.AS has a market cap of 3.36B. Regarding current trading prices, AMUN.PA is priced at $74.20, while ROLA.AS trades at $61.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMUN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas ROLA.AS's P/E ratio is 6.10. In terms of profitability, AMUN.PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ROLA.AS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AMUN.PA is more volatile compared to ROLA.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMUN.PA.
AMUN.PA vs TKO.PA Comparison
AMUN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMUN.PA stands at 15.09B. In comparison, TKO.PA has a market cap of 3.31B. Regarding current trading prices, AMUN.PA is priced at $74.20, while TKO.PA trades at $19.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMUN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas TKO.PA's P/E ratio is 21.03. In terms of profitability, AMUN.PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TKO.PA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AMUN.PA is less volatile compared to TKO.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMUN.PA.
AMUN.PA vs BREB.BR Comparison
AMUN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMUN.PA stands at 15.09B. In comparison, BREB.BR has a market cap of 3.30B. Regarding current trading prices, AMUN.PA is priced at $74.20, while BREB.BR trades at $112.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMUN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas BREB.BR's P/E ratio is 7.99. In terms of profitability, AMUN.PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BREB.BR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AMUN.PA is more volatile compared to BREB.BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMUN.PA.
AMUN.PA vs AEEM.PA Comparison
AMUN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMUN.PA stands at 15.09B. In comparison, AEEM.PA has a market cap of 3.30B. Regarding current trading prices, AMUN.PA is priced at $74.20, while AEEM.PA trades at $5.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMUN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas AEEM.PA's P/E ratio is 14.17. In terms of profitability, AMUN.PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AEEM.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMUN.PA is more volatile compared to AEEM.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMUN.PA.
AMUN.PA vs WESE.PA Comparison
AMUN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMUN.PA stands at 15.09B. In comparison, WESE.PA has a market cap of 3.26B. Regarding current trading prices, AMUN.PA is priced at $74.20, while WESE.PA trades at $68.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMUN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas WESE.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMUN.PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WESE.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMUN.PA is more volatile compared to WESE.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMUN.PA.
AMUN.PA vs ALLFG.AS Comparison
AMUN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMUN.PA stands at 15.09B. In comparison, ALLFG.AS has a market cap of 3.21B. Regarding current trading prices, AMUN.PA is priced at $74.20, while ALLFG.AS trades at $5.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMUN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas ALLFG.AS's P/E ratio is -18.77. In terms of profitability, AMUN.PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ALLFG.AS's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AMUN.PA is less volatile compared to ALLFG.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMUN.PA.
AMUN.PA vs CB3.PA Comparison
AMUN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMUN.PA stands at 15.09B. In comparison, CB3.PA has a market cap of 3.17B. Regarding current trading prices, AMUN.PA is priced at $74.20, while CB3.PA trades at $219.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMUN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas CB3.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMUN.PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CB3.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMUN.PA is more volatile compared to CB3.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMUN.PA.
AMUN.PA vs MSE.PA Comparison
AMUN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMUN.PA stands at 15.09B. In comparison, MSE.PA has a market cap of 3.10B. Regarding current trading prices, AMUN.PA is priced at $74.20, while MSE.PA trades at $59.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMUN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas MSE.PA's P/E ratio is 16.76. In terms of profitability, AMUN.PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MSE.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMUN.PA is more volatile compared to MSE.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMUN.PA.
AMUN.PA vs SEMD.AS Comparison
AMUN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMUN.PA stands at 15.09B. In comparison, SEMD.AS has a market cap of 2.98B. Regarding current trading prices, AMUN.PA is priced at $74.20, while SEMD.AS trades at $5.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMUN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas SEMD.AS's P/E ratio is 15.50. In terms of profitability, AMUN.PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SEMD.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMUN.PA is more volatile compared to SEMD.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMUN.PA.
AMUN.PA vs UST.PA Comparison
AMUN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMUN.PA stands at 15.09B. In comparison, UST.PA has a market cap of 2.87B. Regarding current trading prices, AMUN.PA is priced at $74.20, while UST.PA trades at $75.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMUN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas UST.PA's P/E ratio is 31.54. In terms of profitability, AMUN.PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UST.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMUN.PA is more volatile compared to UST.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMUN.PA.
AMUN.PA vs ESE.PA Comparison
AMUN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMUN.PA stands at 15.09B. In comparison, ESE.PA has a market cap of 2.63B. Regarding current trading prices, AMUN.PA is priced at $74.20, while ESE.PA trades at $26.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMUN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas ESE.PA's P/E ratio is 25.07. In terms of profitability, AMUN.PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ESE.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMUN.PA is more volatile compared to ESE.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMUN.PA.
AMUN.PA vs EUSRI.PA Comparison
AMUN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMUN.PA stands at 15.09B. In comparison, EUSRI.PA has a market cap of 2.53B. Regarding current trading prices, AMUN.PA is priced at $74.20, while EUSRI.PA trades at $86.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMUN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas EUSRI.PA's P/E ratio is 22.40. In terms of profitability, AMUN.PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EUSRI.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AMUN.PA is more volatile compared to EUSRI.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMUN.PA.
AMUN.PA vs EHYA.AS Comparison
AMUN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMUN.PA stands at 15.09B. In comparison, EHYA.AS has a market cap of 2.50B. Regarding current trading prices, AMUN.PA is priced at $74.20, while EHYA.AS trades at $5.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMUN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas EHYA.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMUN.PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EHYA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMUN.PA is more volatile compared to EHYA.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMUN.PA.
AMUN.PA vs GEMU.PA Comparison
AMUN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMUN.PA stands at 15.09B. In comparison, GEMU.PA has a market cap of 2.49B. Regarding current trading prices, AMUN.PA is priced at $74.20, while GEMU.PA trades at $9.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMUN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas GEMU.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMUN.PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GEMU.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMUN.PA is more volatile compared to GEMU.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMUN.PA.
AMUN.PA vs EEUE.PA Comparison
AMUN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMUN.PA stands at 15.09B. In comparison, EEUE.PA has a market cap of 2.42B. Regarding current trading prices, AMUN.PA is priced at $74.20, while EEUE.PA trades at $16.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMUN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas EEUE.PA's P/E ratio is 18.03. In terms of profitability, AMUN.PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EEUE.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMUN.PA is more volatile compared to EEUE.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMUN.PA.
AMUN.PA vs EPAB.PA Comparison
AMUN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMUN.PA stands at 15.09B. In comparison, EPAB.PA has a market cap of 2.36B. Regarding current trading prices, AMUN.PA is priced at $74.20, while EPAB.PA trades at $35.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMUN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas EPAB.PA's P/E ratio is 17.67. In terms of profitability, AMUN.PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EPAB.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMUN.PA is more volatile compared to EPAB.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMUN.PA.
AMUN.PA vs TDIV.AS Comparison
AMUN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMUN.PA stands at 15.09B. In comparison, TDIV.AS has a market cap of 2.20B. Regarding current trading prices, AMUN.PA is priced at $74.20, while TDIV.AS trades at $43.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMUN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas TDIV.AS's P/E ratio is 11.05. In terms of profitability, AMUN.PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TDIV.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMUN.PA is more volatile compared to TDIV.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMUN.PA.
AMUN.PA vs USRI.PA Comparison
AMUN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMUN.PA stands at 15.09B. In comparison, USRI.PA has a market cap of 2.11B. Regarding current trading prices, AMUN.PA is priced at $74.20, while USRI.PA trades at $102.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMUN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas USRI.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMUN.PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to USRI.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMUN.PA is more volatile compared to USRI.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMUN.PA.
AMUN.PA vs EXCH.AS Comparison
AMUN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMUN.PA stands at 15.09B. In comparison, EXCH.AS has a market cap of 2.06B. Regarding current trading prices, AMUN.PA is priced at $74.20, while EXCH.AS trades at $5.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMUN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas EXCH.AS's P/E ratio is 15.44. In terms of profitability, AMUN.PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EXCH.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMUN.PA is more volatile compared to EXCH.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMUN.PA.
AMUN.PA vs ANX.PA Comparison
AMUN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMUN.PA stands at 15.09B. In comparison, ANX.PA has a market cap of 2.05B. Regarding current trading prices, AMUN.PA is priced at $74.20, while ANX.PA trades at $212.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMUN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas ANX.PA's P/E ratio is 31.54. In terms of profitability, AMUN.PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ANX.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMUN.PA is more volatile compared to ANX.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMUN.PA.
AMUN.PA vs PABW.PA Comparison
AMUN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMUN.PA stands at 15.09B. In comparison, PABW.PA has a market cap of 2.04B. Regarding current trading prices, AMUN.PA is priced at $74.20, while PABW.PA trades at $75.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMUN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas PABW.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMUN.PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PABW.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMUN.PA is more volatile compared to PABW.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMUN.PA.
AMUN.PA vs PEUG.PA Comparison
AMUN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMUN.PA stands at 15.09B. In comparison, PEUG.PA has a market cap of 1.96B. Regarding current trading prices, AMUN.PA is priced at $74.20, while PEUG.PA trades at $79.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMUN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas PEUG.PA's P/E ratio is 13.46. In terms of profitability, AMUN.PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PEUG.PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AMUN.PA is less volatile compared to PEUG.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMUN.PA.
AMUN.PA vs ANTIN.PA Comparison
AMUN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMUN.PA stands at 15.09B. In comparison, ANTIN.PA has a market cap of 1.89B. Regarding current trading prices, AMUN.PA is priced at $74.20, while ANTIN.PA trades at $10.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMUN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas ANTIN.PA's P/E ratio is 16.28. In terms of profitability, AMUN.PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ANTIN.PA's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, AMUN.PA is more volatile compared to ANTIN.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMUN.PA.
AMUN.PA vs CSH2.PA Comparison
AMUN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMUN.PA stands at 15.09B. In comparison, CSH2.PA has a market cap of 1.85B. Regarding current trading prices, AMUN.PA is priced at $74.20, while CSH2.PA trades at $106.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMUN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas CSH2.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMUN.PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CSH2.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMUN.PA is more volatile compared to CSH2.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMUN.PA.
AMUN.PA vs TNOW.PA Comparison
AMUN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMUN.PA stands at 15.09B. In comparison, TNOW.PA has a market cap of 1.80B. Regarding current trading prices, AMUN.PA is priced at $74.20, while TNOW.PA trades at $791.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMUN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas TNOW.PA's P/E ratio is 36.23. In terms of profitability, AMUN.PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TNOW.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMUN.PA is less volatile compared to TNOW.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMUN.PA.
AMUN.PA vs CMUD.PA Comparison
AMUN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMUN.PA stands at 15.09B. In comparison, CMUD.PA has a market cap of 1.79B. Regarding current trading prices, AMUN.PA is priced at $74.20, while CMUD.PA trades at $67.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMUN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas CMUD.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMUN.PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CMUD.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMUN.PA is more volatile compared to CMUD.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMUN.PA.
AMUN.PA vs EGOV.PA Comparison
AMUN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMUN.PA stands at 15.09B. In comparison, EGOV.PA has a market cap of 1.73B. Regarding current trading prices, AMUN.PA is priced at $74.20, while EGOV.PA trades at $49.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMUN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas EGOV.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMUN.PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EGOV.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMUN.PA is more volatile compared to EGOV.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMUN.PA.
AMUN.PA vs WAT.PA Comparison
AMUN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMUN.PA stands at 15.09B. In comparison, WAT.PA has a market cap of 1.65B. Regarding current trading prices, AMUN.PA is priced at $74.20, while WAT.PA trades at $67.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMUN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas WAT.PA's P/E ratio is 27.78. In terms of profitability, AMUN.PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WAT.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMUN.PA is more volatile compared to WAT.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMUN.PA.
AMUN.PA vs MUSD.AS Comparison
AMUN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMUN.PA stands at 15.09B. In comparison, MUSD.AS has a market cap of 1.63B. Regarding current trading prices, AMUN.PA is priced at $74.20, while MUSD.AS trades at $7.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMUN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas MUSD.AS's P/E ratio is 26.30. In terms of profitability, AMUN.PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MUSD.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMUN.PA is more volatile compared to MUSD.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMUN.PA.
AMUN.PA vs BNKE.PA Comparison
AMUN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMUN.PA stands at 15.09B. In comparison, BNKE.PA has a market cap of 1.60B. Regarding current trading prices, AMUN.PA is priced at $74.20, while BNKE.PA trades at $236.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMUN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas BNKE.PA's P/E ratio is 9.34. In terms of profitability, AMUN.PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BNKE.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AMUN.PA is more volatile compared to BNKE.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMUN.PA.
AMUN.PA vs BNK.PA Comparison
AMUN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMUN.PA stands at 15.09B. In comparison, BNK.PA has a market cap of 1.56B. Regarding current trading prices, AMUN.PA is priced at $74.20, while BNK.PA trades at $44.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMUN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas BNK.PA's P/E ratio is 9.42. In terms of profitability, AMUN.PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BNK.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMUN.PA is more volatile compared to BNK.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMUN.PA.
AMUN.PA vs MPAB.AS Comparison
AMUN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMUN.PA stands at 15.09B. In comparison, MPAB.AS has a market cap of 1.54B. Regarding current trading prices, AMUN.PA is priced at $74.20, while MPAB.AS trades at $5.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMUN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas MPAB.AS's P/E ratio is 17.37. In terms of profitability, AMUN.PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MPAB.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMUN.PA is more volatile compared to MPAB.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMUN.PA.
AMUN.PA vs GIMB.BR Comparison
AMUN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMUN.PA stands at 15.09B. In comparison, GIMB.BR has a market cap of 1.50B. Regarding current trading prices, AMUN.PA is priced at $74.20, while GIMB.BR trades at $41.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMUN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas GIMB.BR's P/E ratio is 6.00. In terms of profitability, AMUN.PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GIMB.BR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AMUN.PA is more volatile compared to GIMB.BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMUN.PA.
AMUN.PA vs LWCR.PA Comparison
AMUN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMUN.PA stands at 15.09B. In comparison, LWCR.PA has a market cap of 1.50B. Regarding current trading prices, AMUN.PA is priced at $74.20, while LWCR.PA trades at $496.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMUN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas LWCR.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMUN.PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LWCR.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMUN.PA is more volatile compared to LWCR.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMUN.PA.
AMUN.PA vs EMPA.AS Comparison
AMUN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMUN.PA stands at 15.09B. In comparison, EMPA.AS has a market cap of 1.45B. Regarding current trading prices, AMUN.PA is priced at $74.20, while EMPA.AS trades at $6.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMUN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas EMPA.AS's P/E ratio is 17.38. In terms of profitability, AMUN.PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EMPA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMUN.PA is more volatile compared to EMPA.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMUN.PA.
AMUN.PA vs EGRI.PA Comparison
AMUN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMUN.PA stands at 15.09B. In comparison, EGRI.PA has a market cap of 1.42B. Regarding current trading prices, AMUN.PA is priced at $74.20, while EGRI.PA trades at $45.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMUN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas EGRI.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMUN.PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EGRI.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMUN.PA is more volatile compared to EGRI.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMUN.PA.
AMUN.PA vs AASI.PA Comparison
AMUN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMUN.PA stands at 15.09B. In comparison, AASI.PA has a market cap of 1.41B. Regarding current trading prices, AMUN.PA is priced at $74.20, while AASI.PA trades at $39.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMUN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas AASI.PA's P/E ratio is 14.92. In terms of profitability, AMUN.PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AASI.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMUN.PA is more volatile compared to AASI.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMUN.PA.
AMUN.PA vs CG1.PA Comparison
AMUN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMUN.PA stands at 15.09B. In comparison, CG1.PA has a market cap of 1.41B. Regarding current trading prices, AMUN.PA is priced at $74.20, while CG1.PA trades at $418.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMUN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas CG1.PA's P/E ratio is 18.65. In terms of profitability, AMUN.PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CG1.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMUN.PA is less volatile compared to CG1.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMUN.PA.
AMUN.PA vs PHAG.AS Comparison
AMUN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMUN.PA stands at 15.09B. In comparison, PHAG.AS has a market cap of 1.39B. Regarding current trading prices, AMUN.PA is priced at $74.20, while PHAG.AS trades at $26.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMUN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas PHAG.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMUN.PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PHAG.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMUN.PA is less volatile compared to PHAG.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMUN.PA.
AMUN.PA vs ACWI.PA Comparison
AMUN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMUN.PA stands at 15.09B. In comparison, ACWI.PA has a market cap of 1.36B. Regarding current trading prices, AMUN.PA is priced at $74.20, while ACWI.PA trades at $470.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMUN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas ACWI.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMUN.PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ACWI.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMUN.PA is more volatile compared to ACWI.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMUN.PA.
AMUN.PA vs EXA1.AS Comparison
AMUN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMUN.PA stands at 15.09B. In comparison, EXA1.AS has a market cap of 1.35B. Regarding current trading prices, AMUN.PA is priced at $74.20, while EXA1.AS trades at $12.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMUN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas EXA1.AS's P/E ratio is 9.35. In terms of profitability, AMUN.PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EXA1.AS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AMUN.PA is more volatile compared to EXA1.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMUN.PA.
AMUN.PA vs DAX.PA Comparison
AMUN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMUN.PA stands at 15.09B. In comparison, DAX.PA has a market cap of 1.20B. Regarding current trading prices, AMUN.PA is priced at $74.20, while DAX.PA trades at $215.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMUN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas DAX.PA's P/E ratio is 18.69. In terms of profitability, AMUN.PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DAX.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMUN.PA is less volatile compared to DAX.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMUN.PA.
AMUN.PA vs ESGE.PA Comparison
AMUN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMUN.PA stands at 15.09B. In comparison, ESGE.PA has a market cap of 1.20B. Regarding current trading prices, AMUN.PA is priced at $74.20, while ESGE.PA trades at $34.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMUN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas ESGE.PA's P/E ratio is 18.47. In terms of profitability, AMUN.PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ESGE.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMUN.PA is more volatile compared to ESGE.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMUN.PA.
AMUN.PA vs ESGH.PA Comparison
AMUN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMUN.PA stands at 15.09B. In comparison, ESGH.PA has a market cap of 1.20B. Regarding current trading prices, AMUN.PA is priced at $74.20, while ESGH.PA trades at $25.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMUN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas ESGH.PA's P/E ratio is 18.40. In terms of profitability, AMUN.PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ESGH.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMUN.PA is more volatile compared to ESGH.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMUN.PA.
AMUN.PA vs MTE.PA Comparison
AMUN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMUN.PA stands at 15.09B. In comparison, MTE.PA has a market cap of 1.20B. Regarding current trading prices, AMUN.PA is priced at $74.20, while MTE.PA trades at $197.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMUN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas MTE.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMUN.PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MTE.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMUN.PA is more volatile compared to MTE.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMUN.PA.
AMUN.PA vs P500H.PA Comparison
AMUN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMUN.PA stands at 15.09B. In comparison, P500H.PA has a market cap of 1.19B. Regarding current trading prices, AMUN.PA is priced at $74.20, while P500H.PA trades at $36.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMUN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas P500H.PA's P/E ratio is 27.64. In terms of profitability, AMUN.PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to P500H.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMUN.PA is more volatile compared to P500H.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMUN.PA.
AMUN.PA vs WQDA.AS Comparison
AMUN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMUN.PA stands at 15.09B. In comparison, WQDA.AS has a market cap of 1.19B. Regarding current trading prices, AMUN.PA is priced at $74.20, while WQDA.AS trades at $9.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMUN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas WQDA.AS's P/E ratio is 18.21. In terms of profitability, AMUN.PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WQDA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMUN.PA is more volatile compared to WQDA.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMUN.PA.
AMUN.PA vs IX5A.AS Comparison
AMUN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMUN.PA stands at 15.09B. In comparison, IX5A.AS has a market cap of 1.12B. Regarding current trading prices, AMUN.PA is priced at $74.20, while IX5A.AS trades at $5.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMUN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas IX5A.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMUN.PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IX5A.AS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AMUN.PA is more volatile compared to IX5A.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMUN.PA.
AMUN.PA vs TFG.AS Comparison
AMUN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMUN.PA stands at 15.09B. In comparison, TFG.AS has a market cap of 1.10B. Regarding current trading prices, AMUN.PA is priced at $74.20, while TFG.AS trades at $13.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMUN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas TFG.AS's P/E ratio is 3.45. In terms of profitability, AMUN.PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TFG.AS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AMUN.PA is more volatile compared to TFG.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMUN.PA.
AMUN.PA vs MTI.PA Comparison
AMUN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMUN.PA stands at 15.09B. In comparison, MTI.PA has a market cap of 1.10B. Regarding current trading prices, AMUN.PA is priced at $74.20, while MTI.PA trades at $165.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMUN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas MTI.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMUN.PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MTI.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMUN.PA is more volatile compared to MTI.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMUN.PA.
AMUN.PA vs AFRN.PA Comparison
AMUN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMUN.PA stands at 15.09B. In comparison, AFRN.PA has a market cap of 1.10B. Regarding current trading prices, AMUN.PA is priced at $74.20, while AFRN.PA trades at $109.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMUN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.65, whereas AFRN.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMUN.PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AFRN.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMUN.PA is more volatile compared to AFRN.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMUN.PA.