Amergent Hospitality Group, Inc.
Amergent Hospitality Group, Inc. (AMHG) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (AMHG) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Restaurants Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMHG | $0.00 | -99.50% | 1.7K | -0.00 | -$0.19 | N/A |
| CMPGF | $30.09 | +4.59% | 51.2B | 27.36 | $1.10 | +2.19% |
| CMPGY | $29.69 | +0.00% | 51B | 27.28 | $1.10 | +2.13% |
| RSTRF | $68.05 | +0.00% | 22.8B | 25.68 | $2.65 | +3.60% |
| LKNCY | $38.69 | +0.00% | 12.5B | 22.29 | $1.75 | N/A |
| HDALF | $1.94 | +0.00% | 10.5B | 16.17 | $0.12 | +5.57% |
| MDNDF | $42.00 | +0.00% | 5.6B | 25.61 | $1.64 | +0.85% |
| JBFCF | $3.48 | -1.42% | 3.9B | 21.75 | $0.16 | +1.72% |
| JBFCY | $13.97 | -2.17% | 3.9B | 22.27 | $0.62 | +1.72% |
| ALSSF | $3.69 | +10.15% | 3B | -184.50 | -$0.02 | +2.45% |
Stock Comparison
AMHG vs CMPGF Comparison February 2026
AMHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMHG stands at 1.7K. In comparison, CMPGF has a market cap of 51.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMHG is priced at $0.00, while CMPGF trades at $30.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMHG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas CMPGF's P/E ratio is 27.36. In terms of profitability, AMHG's ROE is +0.47%, compared to CMPGF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AMHG is less volatile compared to CMPGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMHG.Check CMPGF's competition here
AMHG vs CMPGY Comparison February 2026
AMHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMHG stands at 1.7K. In comparison, CMPGY has a market cap of 51B. Regarding current trading prices, AMHG is priced at $0.00, while CMPGY trades at $29.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMHG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas CMPGY's P/E ratio is 27.28. In terms of profitability, AMHG's ROE is +0.47%, compared to CMPGY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AMHG is less volatile compared to CMPGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMHG.Check CMPGY's competition here
AMHG vs RSTRF Comparison February 2026
AMHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMHG stands at 1.7K. In comparison, RSTRF has a market cap of 22.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMHG is priced at $0.00, while RSTRF trades at $68.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMHG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas RSTRF's P/E ratio is 25.68. In terms of profitability, AMHG's ROE is +0.47%, compared to RSTRF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, AMHG and RSTRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RSTRF's competition here
AMHG vs LKNCY Comparison February 2026
AMHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMHG stands at 1.7K. In comparison, LKNCY has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMHG is priced at $0.00, while LKNCY trades at $38.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMHG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas LKNCY's P/E ratio is 22.29. In terms of profitability, AMHG's ROE is +0.47%, compared to LKNCY's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, AMHG is less volatile compared to LKNCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMHG.Check LKNCY's competition here
AMHG vs HDALF Comparison February 2026
AMHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMHG stands at 1.7K. In comparison, HDALF has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMHG is priced at $0.00, while HDALF trades at $1.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMHG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas HDALF's P/E ratio is 16.17. In terms of profitability, AMHG's ROE is +0.47%, compared to HDALF's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, AMHG and HDALF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HDALF's competition here
AMHG vs MDNDF Comparison February 2026
AMHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMHG stands at 1.7K. In comparison, MDNDF has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AMHG is priced at $0.00, while MDNDF trades at $42.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMHG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas MDNDF's P/E ratio is 25.61. In terms of profitability, AMHG's ROE is +0.47%, compared to MDNDF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AMHG and MDNDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MDNDF's competition here
AMHG vs JBFCF Comparison February 2026
AMHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMHG stands at 1.7K. In comparison, JBFCF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMHG is priced at $0.00, while JBFCF trades at $3.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMHG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas JBFCF's P/E ratio is 21.75. In terms of profitability, AMHG's ROE is +0.47%, compared to JBFCF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AMHG is less volatile compared to JBFCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMHG.Check JBFCF's competition here
AMHG vs JBFCY Comparison February 2026
AMHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMHG stands at 1.7K. In comparison, JBFCY has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMHG is priced at $0.00, while JBFCY trades at $13.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMHG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas JBFCY's P/E ratio is 22.27. In terms of profitability, AMHG's ROE is +0.47%, compared to JBFCY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AMHG is less volatile compared to JBFCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMHG.Check JBFCY's competition here
AMHG vs ALSSF Comparison February 2026
AMHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMHG stands at 1.7K. In comparison, ALSSF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMHG is priced at $0.00, while ALSSF trades at $3.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMHG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas ALSSF's P/E ratio is -184.50. In terms of profitability, AMHG's ROE is +0.47%, compared to ALSSF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, AMHG is less volatile compared to ALSSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMHG.Check ALSSF's competition here
AMHG vs ATGSY Comparison February 2026
AMHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMHG stands at 1.7K. In comparison, ATGSY has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMHG is priced at $0.00, while ATGSY trades at $6.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMHG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas ATGSY's P/E ratio is -40.94. In terms of profitability, AMHG's ROE is +0.47%, compared to ATGSY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AMHG and ATGSY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ATGSY's competition here
AMHG vs SKLYF Comparison February 2026
AMHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMHG stands at 1.7K. In comparison, SKLYF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMHG is priced at $0.00, while SKLYF trades at $10.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMHG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SKLYF's P/E ratio is 152.86. In terms of profitability, AMHG's ROE is +0.47%, compared to SKLYF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AMHG and SKLYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SKLYF's competition here
AMHG vs ATGSF Comparison February 2026
AMHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMHG stands at 1.7K. In comparison, ATGSF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMHG is priced at $0.00, while ATGSF trades at $5.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMHG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas ATGSF's P/E ratio is -37.53. In terms of profitability, AMHG's ROE is +0.47%, compared to ATGSF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AMHG and ATGSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ATGSF's competition here
AMHG vs MBPFF Comparison February 2026
AMHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMHG stands at 1.7K. In comparison, MBPFF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMHG is priced at $0.00, while MBPFF trades at $3.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMHG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas MBPFF's P/E ratio is 8.53. In terms of profitability, AMHG's ROE is +0.47%, compared to MBPFF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AMHG and MBPFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MBPFF's competition here
AMHG vs SGLOF Comparison February 2026
AMHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMHG stands at 1.7K. In comparison, SGLOF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMHG is priced at $0.00, while SGLOF trades at $17.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMHG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SGLOF's P/E ratio is 29.71. In terms of profitability, AMHG's ROE is +0.47%, compared to SGLOF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, AMHG and SGLOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SGLOF's competition here
AMHG vs SSPPF Comparison February 2026
AMHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMHG stands at 1.7K. In comparison, SSPPF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMHG is priced at $0.00, while SSPPF trades at $2.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMHG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SSPPF's P/E ratio is -19.31. In terms of profitability, AMHG's ROE is +0.47%, compared to SSPPF's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, AMHG and SSPPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SSPPF's competition here
AMHG vs ARHOF Comparison February 2026
AMHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMHG stands at 1.7K. In comparison, ARHOF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMHG is priced at $0.00, while ARHOF trades at $8.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMHG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas ARHOF's P/E ratio is -9.57. In terms of profitability, AMHG's ROE is +0.47%, compared to ARHOF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AMHG and ARHOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ARHOF's competition here
AMHG vs DPZUF Comparison February 2026
AMHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMHG stands at 1.7K. In comparison, DPZUF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMHG is priced at $0.00, while DPZUF trades at $15.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMHG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas DPZUF's P/E ratio is -520.00. In terms of profitability, AMHG's ROE is +0.47%, compared to DPZUF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AMHG and DPZUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DPZUF's competition here
AMHG vs DMZPY Comparison February 2026
AMHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMHG stands at 1.7K. In comparison, DMZPY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMHG is priced at $0.00, while DMZPY trades at $7.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMHG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas DMZPY's P/E ratio is -770.00. In terms of profitability, AMHG's ROE is +0.47%, compared to DMZPY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AMHG and DMZPY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DMZPY's competition here
AMHG vs ELORY Comparison February 2026
AMHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMHG stands at 1.7K. In comparison, ELORY has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMHG is priced at $0.00, while ELORY trades at $4.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMHG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas ELORY's P/E ratio is -2.48. In terms of profitability, AMHG's ROE is +0.47%, compared to ELORY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AMHG and ELORY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ELORY's competition here
AMHG vs DPUKY Comparison February 2026
AMHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMHG stands at 1.7K. In comparison, DPUKY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMHG is priced at $0.00, while DPUKY trades at $5.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMHG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas DPUKY's P/E ratio is 10.13. In terms of profitability, AMHG's ROE is +0.47%, compared to DPUKY's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, AMHG is less volatile compared to DPUKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMHG.Check DPUKY's competition here
AMHG vs WHCA Comparison February 2026
AMHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMHG stands at 1.7K. In comparison, WHCA has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMHG is priced at $0.00, while WHCA trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMHG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas WHCA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMHG's ROE is +0.47%, compared to WHCA's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, AMHG is less volatile compared to WHCA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMHG.Check WHCA's competition here
AMHG vs JDWPY Comparison February 2026
AMHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMHG stands at 1.7K. In comparison, JDWPY has a market cap of 986M. Regarding current trading prices, AMHG is priced at $0.00, while JDWPY trades at $44.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMHG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas JDWPY's P/E ratio is 11.49. In terms of profitability, AMHG's ROE is +0.47%, compared to JDWPY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AMHG and JDWPY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check JDWPY's competition here
AMHG vs HLFFF Comparison February 2026
AMHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMHG stands at 1.7K. In comparison, HLFFF has a market cap of 954.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AMHG is priced at $0.00, while HLFFF trades at $6.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMHG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas HLFFF's P/E ratio is -4.78. In terms of profitability, AMHG's ROE is +0.47%, compared to HLFFF's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, AMHG and HLFFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HLFFF's competition here
AMHG vs JDWPF Comparison February 2026
AMHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMHG stands at 1.7K. In comparison, JDWPF has a market cap of 930.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AMHG is priced at $0.00, while JDWPF trades at $8.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMHG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas JDWPF's P/E ratio is 11.32. In terms of profitability, AMHG's ROE is +0.47%, compared to JDWPF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AMHG and JDWPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check JDWPF's competition here
AMHG vs HELFY Comparison February 2026
AMHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMHG stands at 1.7K. In comparison, HELFY has a market cap of 886.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AMHG is priced at $0.00, while HELFY trades at $1.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMHG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas HELFY's P/E ratio is -4.47. In terms of profitability, AMHG's ROE is +0.47%, compared to HELFY's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, AMHG and HELFY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HELFY's competition here
AMHG vs ELROF Comparison February 2026
AMHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMHG stands at 1.7K. In comparison, ELROF has a market cap of 842.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AMHG is priced at $0.00, while ELROF trades at $3.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMHG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas ELROF's P/E ratio is 8.32. In terms of profitability, AMHG's ROE is +0.47%, compared to ELROF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AMHG and ELROF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ELROF's competition here
AMHG vs DMPZF Comparison February 2026
AMHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMHG stands at 1.7K. In comparison, DMPZF has a market cap of 839.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AMHG is priced at $0.00, while DMPZF trades at $2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMHG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas DMPZF's P/E ratio is 8.15. In terms of profitability, AMHG's ROE is +0.47%, compared to DMPZF's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, AMHG and DMPZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DMPZF's competition here
AMHG vs CLLFF Comparison February 2026
AMHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMHG stands at 1.7K. In comparison, CLLFF has a market cap of 815.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AMHG is priced at $0.00, while CLLFF trades at $6.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMHG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas CLLFF's P/E ratio is 138.00. In terms of profitability, AMHG's ROE is +0.47%, compared to CLLFF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AMHG is less volatile compared to CLLFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMHG.Check CLLFF's competition here
AMHG vs MTYFF Comparison February 2026
AMHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMHG stands at 1.7K. In comparison, MTYFF has a market cap of 718.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AMHG is priced at $0.00, while MTYFF trades at $32.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMHG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas MTYFF's P/E ratio is 28.86. In terms of profitability, AMHG's ROE is +0.47%, compared to MTYFF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AMHG is less volatile compared to MTYFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMHG.Check MTYFF's competition here
AMHG vs RSTGF Comparison February 2026
AMHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMHG stands at 1.7K. In comparison, RSTGF has a market cap of 649.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AMHG is priced at $0.00, while RSTGF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMHG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas RSTGF's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, AMHG's ROE is +0.47%, compared to RSTGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AMHG and RSTGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RSTGF's competition here
AMHG vs MRTPY Comparison February 2026
AMHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMHG stands at 1.7K. In comparison, MRTPY has a market cap of 506.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AMHG is priced at $0.00, while MRTPY trades at $8.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMHG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas MRTPY's P/E ratio is 5.30. In terms of profitability, AMHG's ROE is +0.47%, compared to MRTPY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AMHG and MRTPY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MRTPY's competition here
AMHG vs MARZF Comparison February 2026
AMHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMHG stands at 1.7K. In comparison, MARZF has a market cap of 505M. Regarding current trading prices, AMHG is priced at $0.00, while MARZF trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMHG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas MARZF's P/E ratio is 5.32. In terms of profitability, AMHG's ROE is +0.47%, compared to MARZF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AMHG and MARZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MARZF's competition here
AMHG vs CFCGF Comparison February 2026
AMHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMHG stands at 1.7K. In comparison, CFCGF has a market cap of 502.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AMHG is priced at $0.00, while CFCGF trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMHG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas CFCGF's P/E ratio is 87.62. In terms of profitability, AMHG's ROE is +0.47%, compared to CFCGF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AMHG is less volatile compared to CFCGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMHG.Check CFCGF's competition here
AMHG vs MLYSF Comparison February 2026
AMHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMHG stands at 1.7K. In comparison, MLYSF has a market cap of 399M. Regarding current trading prices, AMHG is priced at $0.00, while MLYSF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMHG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas MLYSF's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, AMHG's ROE is +0.47%, compared to MLYSF's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, AMHG and MLYSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MLYSF's competition here
AMHG vs RTBRF Comparison February 2026
AMHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMHG stands at 1.7K. In comparison, RTBRF has a market cap of 351.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AMHG is priced at $0.00, while RTBRF trades at $2.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMHG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas RTBRF's P/E ratio is 23.50. In terms of profitability, AMHG's ROE is +0.47%, compared to RTBRF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AMHG and RTBRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RTBRF's competition here
AMHG vs FMBRY Comparison February 2026
AMHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMHG stands at 1.7K. In comparison, FMBRY has a market cap of 330.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AMHG is priced at $0.00, while FMBRY trades at $6.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMHG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas FMBRY's P/E ratio is 9.30. In terms of profitability, AMHG's ROE is +0.47%, compared to FMBRY's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, AMHG and FMBRY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FMBRY's competition here
AMHG vs PZRIF Comparison February 2026
AMHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMHG stands at 1.7K. In comparison, PZRIF has a market cap of 293.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AMHG is priced at $0.00, while PZRIF trades at $11.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMHG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas PZRIF's P/E ratio is 17.28. In terms of profitability, AMHG's ROE is +0.47%, compared to PZRIF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AMHG and PZRIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PZRIF's competition here
AMHG vs CRNGF Comparison February 2026
AMHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMHG stands at 1.7K. In comparison, CRNGF has a market cap of 172.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AMHG is priced at $0.00, while CRNGF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMHG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas CRNGF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMHG's ROE is +0.47%, compared to CRNGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AMHG and CRNGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CRNGF's competition here
AMHG vs DLII Comparison February 2026
AMHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMHG stands at 1.7K. In comparison, DLII has a market cap of 168.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AMHG is priced at $0.00, while DLII trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMHG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas DLII's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMHG's ROE is +0.47%, compared to DLII's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AMHG and DLII have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DLII's competition here
AMHG vs XIAXF Comparison February 2026
AMHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMHG stands at 1.7K. In comparison, XIAXF has a market cap of 144.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AMHG is priced at $0.00, while XIAXF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMHG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas XIAXF's P/E ratio is -4.59. In terms of profitability, AMHG's ROE is +0.47%, compared to XIAXF's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, AMHG and XIAXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check XIAXF's competition here
AMHG vs FRWDF Comparison February 2026
AMHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMHG stands at 1.7K. In comparison, FRWDF has a market cap of 82.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AMHG is priced at $0.00, while FRWDF trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMHG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas FRWDF's P/E ratio is 21.27. In terms of profitability, AMHG's ROE is +0.47%, compared to FRWDF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AMHG and FRWDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FRWDF's competition here
AMHG vs FRHHF Comparison February 2026
AMHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMHG stands at 1.7K. In comparison, FRHHF has a market cap of 50.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AMHG is priced at $0.00, while FRHHF trades at $1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMHG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas FRHHF's P/E ratio is -6.08. In terms of profitability, AMHG's ROE is +0.47%, compared to FRHHF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AMHG and FRHHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FRHHF's competition here
AMHG vs TNGPF Comparison February 2026
AMHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMHG stands at 1.7K. In comparison, TNGPF has a market cap of 47.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AMHG is priced at $0.00, while TNGPF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMHG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas TNGPF's P/E ratio is 4.10. In terms of profitability, AMHG's ROE is +0.47%, compared to TNGPF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AMHG is less volatile compared to TNGPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMHG.Check TNGPF's competition here
AMHG vs MHGUP Comparison February 2026
AMHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMHG stands at 1.7K. In comparison, MHGUP has a market cap of 33.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AMHG is priced at $0.00, while MHGUP trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMHG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas MHGUP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMHG's ROE is +0.47%, compared to MHGUP's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AMHG and MHGUP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MHGUP's competition here
AMHG vs FBGI Comparison February 2026
AMHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMHG stands at 1.7K. In comparison, FBGI has a market cap of 30.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AMHG is priced at $0.00, while FBGI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMHG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas FBGI's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, AMHG's ROE is +0.47%, compared to FBGI's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, AMHG is less volatile compared to FBGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMHG.Check FBGI's competition here
AMHG vs GLLDF Comparison February 2026
AMHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMHG stands at 1.7K. In comparison, GLLDF has a market cap of 27.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AMHG is priced at $0.00, while GLLDF trades at $2.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMHG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas GLLDF's P/E ratio is 7.51. In terms of profitability, AMHG's ROE is +0.47%, compared to GLLDF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AMHG and GLLDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GLLDF's competition here
AMHG vs MHGU Comparison February 2026
AMHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMHG stands at 1.7K. In comparison, MHGU has a market cap of 21.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AMHG is priced at $0.00, while MHGU trades at $3.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMHG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas MHGU's P/E ratio is -2.01. In terms of profitability, AMHG's ROE is +0.47%, compared to MHGU's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AMHG is less volatile compared to MHGU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMHG.Check MHGU's competition here
AMHG vs MORRF Comparison February 2026
AMHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMHG stands at 1.7K. In comparison, MORRF has a market cap of 20.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AMHG is priced at $0.00, while MORRF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMHG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas MORRF's P/E ratio is -2.33. In terms of profitability, AMHG's ROE is +0.47%, compared to MORRF's ROE of -2.51%. Regarding short-term risk, AMHG and MORRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MORRF's competition here
AMHG vs SCUPF Comparison February 2026
AMHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMHG stands at 1.7K. In comparison, SCUPF has a market cap of 17.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AMHG is priced at $0.00, while SCUPF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMHG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SCUPF's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, AMHG's ROE is +0.47%, compared to SCUPF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AMHG and SCUPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SCUPF's competition here
AMHG vs GTEH Comparison February 2026
AMHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMHG stands at 1.7K. In comparison, GTEH has a market cap of 15.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AMHG is priced at $0.00, while GTEH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMHG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas GTEH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMHG's ROE is +0.47%, compared to GTEH's ROE of -2.69%. Regarding short-term risk, AMHG is less volatile compared to GTEH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMHG.Check GTEH's competition here
AMHG vs FCCI Comparison February 2026
AMHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMHG stands at 1.7K. In comparison, FCCI has a market cap of 10.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AMHG is priced at $0.00, while FCCI trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMHG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas FCCI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMHG's ROE is +0.47%, compared to FCCI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AMHG and FCCI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FCCI's competition here
AMHG vs NROM Comparison February 2026
AMHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMHG stands at 1.7K. In comparison, NROM has a market cap of 7.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AMHG is priced at $0.00, while NROM trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMHG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas NROM's P/E ratio is 11.33. In terms of profitability, AMHG's ROE is +0.47%, compared to NROM's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, AMHG and NROM have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NROM's competition here
AMHG vs GMPR Comparison February 2026
AMHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMHG stands at 1.7K. In comparison, GMPR has a market cap of 7.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AMHG is priced at $0.00, while GMPR trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMHG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas GMPR's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, AMHG's ROE is +0.47%, compared to GMPR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AMHG is less volatile compared to GMPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMHG.Check GMPR's competition here
AMHG vs JKHCF Comparison February 2026
AMHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMHG stands at 1.7K. In comparison, JKHCF has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AMHG is priced at $0.00, while JKHCF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMHG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas JKHCF's P/E ratio is -0.49. In terms of profitability, AMHG's ROE is +0.47%, compared to JKHCF's ROE of -1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AMHG is less volatile compared to JKHCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMHG.Check JKHCF's competition here
AMHG vs FATAQ Comparison February 2026
AMHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMHG stands at 1.7K. In comparison, FATAQ has a market cap of 4.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AMHG is priced at $0.00, while FATAQ trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMHG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas FATAQ's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, AMHG's ROE is +0.47%, compared to FATAQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AMHG is less volatile compared to FATAQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMHG.Check FATAQ's competition here
AMHG vs RFGPF Comparison February 2026
AMHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMHG stands at 1.7K. In comparison, RFGPF has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AMHG is priced at $0.00, while RFGPF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMHG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas RFGPF's P/E ratio is 0.67. In terms of profitability, AMHG's ROE is +0.47%, compared to RFGPF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AMHG is less volatile compared to RFGPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMHG.Check RFGPF's competition here
AMHG vs GGLT Comparison February 2026
AMHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMHG stands at 1.7K. In comparison, GGLT has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AMHG is priced at $0.00, while GGLT trades at $200.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMHG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas GGLT's P/E ratio is 1.33. In terms of profitability, AMHG's ROE is +0.47%, compared to GGLT's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AMHG and GGLT have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GGLT's competition here
AMHG vs ODDAF Comparison February 2026
AMHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMHG stands at 1.7K. In comparison, ODDAF has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AMHG is priced at $0.00, while ODDAF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMHG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas ODDAF's P/E ratio is -1.22. In terms of profitability, AMHG's ROE is +0.47%, compared to ODDAF's ROE of +0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, AMHG and ODDAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ODDAF's competition here
AMHG vs BDVB Comparison February 2026
AMHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMHG stands at 1.7K. In comparison, BDVB has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AMHG is priced at $0.00, while BDVB trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMHG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas BDVB's P/E ratio is -0.62. In terms of profitability, AMHG's ROE is +0.47%, compared to BDVB's ROE of -1.72%. Regarding short-term risk, AMHG and BDVB have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BDVB's competition here
AMHG vs KITL Comparison February 2026
AMHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMHG stands at 1.7K. In comparison, KITL has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AMHG is priced at $0.00, while KITL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMHG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas KITL's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, AMHG's ROE is +0.47%, compared to KITL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AMHG is less volatile compared to KITL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMHG.Check KITL's competition here
AMHG vs ZAAG Comparison February 2026
AMHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMHG stands at 1.7K. In comparison, ZAAG has a market cap of 952.8K. Regarding current trading prices, AMHG is priced at $0.00, while ZAAG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMHG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas ZAAG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMHG's ROE is +0.47%, compared to ZAAG's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AMHG and ZAAG have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ZAAG's competition here
AMHG vs GAMN Comparison February 2026
AMHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMHG stands at 1.7K. In comparison, GAMN has a market cap of 419.7K. Regarding current trading prices, AMHG is priced at $0.00, while GAMN trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMHG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas GAMN's P/E ratio is -0.79. In terms of profitability, AMHG's ROE is +0.47%, compared to GAMN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AMHG and GAMN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GAMN's competition here
AMHG vs BLUU Comparison February 2026
AMHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMHG stands at 1.7K. In comparison, BLUU has a market cap of 37.3K. Regarding current trading prices, AMHG is priced at $0.00, while BLUU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMHG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas BLUU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMHG's ROE is +0.47%, compared to BLUU's ROE of +3.93%. Regarding short-term risk, AMHG and BLUU have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BLUU's competition here
AMHG vs PFSF Comparison February 2026
AMHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMHG stands at 1.7K. In comparison, PFSF has a market cap of 32.1K. Regarding current trading prices, AMHG is priced at $0.00, while PFSF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMHG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas PFSF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, AMHG's ROE is +0.47%, compared to PFSF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AMHG and PFSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PFSF's competition here
AMHG vs GASMF Comparison February 2026
AMHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMHG stands at 1.7K. In comparison, GASMF has a market cap of 29.8K. Regarding current trading prices, AMHG is priced at $0.00, while GASMF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMHG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas GASMF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, AMHG's ROE is +0.47%, compared to GASMF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AMHG and GASMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GASMF's competition here
AMHG vs RIBS Comparison February 2026
AMHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMHG stands at 1.7K. In comparison, RIBS has a market cap of 19.5K. Regarding current trading prices, AMHG is priced at $0.00, while RIBS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMHG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas RIBS's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, AMHG's ROE is +0.47%, compared to RIBS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMHG and RIBS have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RIBS's competition here
AMHG vs BBUCQ Comparison February 2026
AMHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMHG stands at 1.7K. In comparison, BBUCQ has a market cap of 17.2K. Regarding current trading prices, AMHG is priced at $0.00, while BBUCQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMHG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas BBUCQ's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, AMHG's ROE is +0.47%, compared to BBUCQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AMHG and BBUCQ have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BBUCQ's competition here
AMHG vs COFE Comparison February 2026
AMHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMHG stands at 1.7K. In comparison, COFE has a market cap of 16K. Regarding current trading prices, AMHG is priced at $0.00, while COFE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMHG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas COFE's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, AMHG's ROE is +0.47%, compared to COFE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AMHG and COFE have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check COFE's competition here
AMHG vs SWRL Comparison February 2026
AMHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMHG stands at 1.7K. In comparison, SWRL has a market cap of 6.6K. Regarding current trading prices, AMHG is priced at $0.00, while SWRL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMHG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SWRL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMHG's ROE is +0.47%, compared to SWRL's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AMHG and SWRL have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SWRL's competition here
AMHG vs CORG Comparison February 2026
AMHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMHG stands at 1.7K. In comparison, CORG has a market cap of 2.7K. Regarding current trading prices, AMHG is priced at $0.00, while CORG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMHG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas CORG's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, AMHG's ROE is +0.47%, compared to CORG's ROE of +3.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AMHG is less volatile compared to CORG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMHG.Check CORG's competition here
AMHG vs SCFFF Comparison February 2026
AMHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMHG stands at 1.7K. In comparison, SCFFF has a market cap of 1.6K. Regarding current trading prices, AMHG is priced at $0.00, while SCFFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMHG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SCFFF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMHG's ROE is +0.47%, compared to SCFFF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AMHG and SCFFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SCFFF's competition here
AMHG vs GCFB Comparison February 2026
AMHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMHG stands at 1.7K. In comparison, GCFB has a market cap of 1.4K. Regarding current trading prices, AMHG is priced at $0.00, while GCFB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMHG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas GCFB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMHG's ROE is +0.47%, compared to GCFB's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, AMHG and GCFB have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GCFB's competition here
AMHG vs HTRE Comparison February 2026
AMHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMHG stands at 1.7K. In comparison, HTRE has a market cap of 171. Regarding current trading prices, AMHG is priced at $0.00, while HTRE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMHG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas HTRE's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, AMHG's ROE is +0.47%, compared to HTRE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AMHG and HTRE have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HTRE's competition here
AMHG vs ULFS Comparison February 2026
AMHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMHG stands at 1.7K. In comparison, ULFS has a market cap of 70. Regarding current trading prices, AMHG is priced at $0.00, while ULFS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMHG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas ULFS's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, AMHG's ROE is +0.47%, compared to ULFS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AMHG and ULFS have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ULFS's competition here
AMHG vs PNSTQ Comparison February 2026
AMHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMHG stands at 1.7K. In comparison, PNSTQ has a market cap of 41. Regarding current trading prices, AMHG is priced at $0.00, while PNSTQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMHG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas PNSTQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMHG's ROE is +0.47%, compared to PNSTQ's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AMHG is less volatile compared to PNSTQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMHG.Check PNSTQ's competition here
AMHG vs RKLC Comparison February 2026
AMHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMHG stands at 1.7K. In comparison, RKLC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AMHG is priced at $0.00, while RKLC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMHG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas RKLC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMHG's ROE is +0.47%, compared to RKLC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AMHG and RKLC have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RKLC's competition here