Amber Enterprises India Limited

AMBER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMBER.NS stands at 269.1B. In comparison, AMBER.BO has a market cap of 269B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBER.NS is priced at ₹7,705.50, while AMBER.BO trades at ₹7,705.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMBER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 164.28, whereas AMBER.BO's P/E ratio is 164.18. In terms of profitability, AMBER.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AMBER.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBER.NS is less volatile compared to AMBER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBER.NS.Check AMBER.BO's competition here

AMBER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMBER.NS stands at 269.1B. In comparison, CROMPTON.BO has a market cap of 171.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBER.NS is priced at ₹7,705.50, while CROMPTON.BO trades at ₹265.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMBER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 164.28, whereas CROMPTON.BO's P/E ratio is 37.21. In terms of profitability, AMBER.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CROMPTON.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBER.NS is less volatile compared to CROMPTON.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBER.NS.Check CROMPTON.BO's competition here

AMBER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMBER.NS stands at 269.1B. In comparison, CROMPTON.NS has a market cap of 170.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBER.NS is priced at ₹7,705.50, while CROMPTON.NS trades at ₹265.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMBER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 164.28, whereas CROMPTON.NS's P/E ratio is 37.02. In terms of profitability, AMBER.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CROMPTON.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBER.NS is more volatile compared to CROMPTON.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBER.NS.Check CROMPTON.NS's competition here

AMBER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMBER.NS stands at 269.1B. In comparison, CENTURYPLY.NS has a market cap of 167.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBER.NS is priced at ₹7,705.50, while CENTURYPLY.NS trades at ₹761.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMBER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 164.28, whereas CENTURYPLY.NS's P/E ratio is 70.30. In terms of profitability, AMBER.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CENTURYPLY.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBER.NS is more volatile compared to CENTURYPLY.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBER.NS.Check CENTURYPLY.NS's competition here

AMBER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMBER.NS stands at 269.1B. In comparison, WHIRLPOOL.NS has a market cap of 118B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBER.NS is priced at ₹7,705.50, while WHIRLPOOL.NS trades at ₹913.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMBER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 164.28, whereas WHIRLPOOL.NS's P/E ratio is 35.45. In terms of profitability, AMBER.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WHIRLPOOL.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBER.NS is less volatile compared to WHIRLPOOL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBER.NS.Check WHIRLPOOL.NS's competition here

AMBER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMBER.NS stands at 269.1B. In comparison, WHIRLPOOL.BO has a market cap of 117.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBER.NS is priced at ₹7,705.50, while WHIRLPOOL.BO trades at ₹913.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMBER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 164.28, whereas WHIRLPOOL.BO's P/E ratio is 33.65. In terms of profitability, AMBER.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WHIRLPOOL.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBER.NS is more volatile compared to WHIRLPOOL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBER.NS.Check WHIRLPOOL.BO's competition here

AMBER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMBER.NS stands at 269.1B. In comparison, EUREKAFORB.BO has a market cap of 99.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBER.NS is priced at ₹7,705.50, while EUREKAFORB.BO trades at ₹513.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMBER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 164.28, whereas EUREKAFORB.BO's P/E ratio is 62.46. In terms of profitability, AMBER.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EUREKAFORB.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBER.NS is less volatile compared to EUREKAFORB.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBER.NS.Check EUREKAFORB.BO's competition here

AMBER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMBER.NS stands at 269.1B. In comparison, EUREKAFORB.NS has a market cap of 99.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBER.NS is priced at ₹7,705.50, while EUREKAFORB.NS trades at ₹513.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMBER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 164.28, whereas EUREKAFORB.NS's P/E ratio is 62.37. In terms of profitability, AMBER.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EUREKAFORB.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBER.NS is less volatile compared to EUREKAFORB.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBER.NS.Check EUREKAFORB.NS's competition here

AMBER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMBER.NS stands at 269.1B. In comparison, CELLO.NS has a market cap of 98B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBER.NS is priced at ₹7,705.50, while CELLO.NS trades at ₹449.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMBER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 164.28, whereas CELLO.NS's P/E ratio is 31.72. In terms of profitability, AMBER.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CELLO.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBER.NS is more volatile compared to CELLO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBER.NS.Check CELLO.NS's competition here

AMBER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMBER.NS stands at 269.1B. In comparison, CELLO.BO has a market cap of 97.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBER.NS is priced at ₹7,705.50, while CELLO.BO trades at ₹450.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMBER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 164.28, whereas CELLO.BO's P/E ratio is 31.72. In terms of profitability, AMBER.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CELLO.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBER.NS is more volatile compared to CELLO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBER.NS.Check CELLO.BO's competition here

AMBER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMBER.NS stands at 269.1B. In comparison, TTKPRESTIG.BO has a market cap of 73.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBER.NS is priced at ₹7,705.50, while TTKPRESTIG.BO trades at ₹552.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMBER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 164.28, whereas TTKPRESTIG.BO's P/E ratio is 87.78. In terms of profitability, AMBER.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TTKPRESTIG.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBER.NS is more volatile compared to TTKPRESTIG.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBER.NS.Check TTKPRESTIG.BO's competition here

AMBER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMBER.NS stands at 269.1B. In comparison, TTKPRESTIG.NS has a market cap of 73.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBER.NS is priced at ₹7,705.50, while TTKPRESTIG.NS trades at ₹552.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMBER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 164.28, whereas TTKPRESTIG.NS's P/E ratio is 87.60. In terms of profitability, AMBER.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TTKPRESTIG.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBER.NS is more volatile compared to TTKPRESTIG.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBER.NS.Check TTKPRESTIG.NS's competition here

AMBER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMBER.NS stands at 269.1B. In comparison, AVL.BO has a market cap of 62.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBER.NS is priced at ₹7,705.50, while AVL.BO trades at ₹490.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMBER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 164.28, whereas AVL.BO's P/E ratio is 56.79. In terms of profitability, AMBER.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AVL.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBER.NS is less volatile compared to AVL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBER.NS.Check AVL.BO's competition here

AMBER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMBER.NS stands at 269.1B. In comparison, GREENLAM.BO has a market cap of 62B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBER.NS is priced at ₹7,705.50, while GREENLAM.BO trades at ₹241.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMBER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 164.28, whereas GREENLAM.BO's P/E ratio is 362.69. In terms of profitability, AMBER.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GREENLAM.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBER.NS is less volatile compared to GREENLAM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBER.NS.Check GREENLAM.BO's competition here

AMBER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMBER.NS stands at 269.1B. In comparison, GREENLAM.NS has a market cap of 62B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBER.NS is priced at ₹7,705.50, while GREENLAM.NS trades at ₹242.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMBER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 164.28, whereas GREENLAM.NS's P/E ratio is 362.57. In terms of profitability, AMBER.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GREENLAM.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBER.NS is less volatile compared to GREENLAM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBER.NS.Check GREENLAM.NS's competition here

AMBER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMBER.NS stands at 269.1B. In comparison, SFL.BO has a market cap of 61.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBER.NS is priced at ₹7,705.50, while SFL.BO trades at ₹573.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMBER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 164.28, whereas SFL.BO's P/E ratio is 69.86. In terms of profitability, AMBER.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SFL.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBER.NS is more volatile compared to SFL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBER.NS.Check SFL.BO's competition here

AMBER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMBER.NS stands at 269.1B. In comparison, SFL.NS has a market cap of 61.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBER.NS is priced at ₹7,705.50, while SFL.NS trades at ₹573.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMBER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 164.28, whereas SFL.NS's P/E ratio is 69.41. In terms of profitability, AMBER.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SFL.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBER.NS is more volatile compared to SFL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBER.NS.Check SFL.NS's competition here

AMBER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMBER.NS stands at 269.1B. In comparison, SYMPHONY.NS has a market cap of 56.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBER.NS is priced at ₹7,705.50, while SYMPHONY.NS trades at ₹824.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMBER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 164.28, whereas SYMPHONY.NS's P/E ratio is 33.74. In terms of profitability, AMBER.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SYMPHONY.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBER.NS is less volatile compared to SYMPHONY.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBER.NS.Check SYMPHONY.NS's competition here

AMBER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMBER.NS stands at 269.1B. In comparison, SYMPHONY.BO has a market cap of 56.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBER.NS is priced at ₹7,705.50, while SYMPHONY.BO trades at ₹826.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMBER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 164.28, whereas SYMPHONY.BO's P/E ratio is 33.63. In terms of profitability, AMBER.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SYMPHONY.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBER.NS is less volatile compared to SYMPHONY.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBER.NS.Check SYMPHONY.BO's competition here

AMBER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMBER.NS stands at 269.1B. In comparison, IFBIND.BO has a market cap of 47.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBER.NS is priced at ₹7,705.50, while IFBIND.BO trades at ₹1,136.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMBER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 164.28, whereas IFBIND.BO's P/E ratio is 39.28. In terms of profitability, AMBER.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IFBIND.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBER.NS is less volatile compared to IFBIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBER.NS.Check IFBIND.BO's competition here

AMBER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMBER.NS stands at 269.1B. In comparison, IFBIND.NS has a market cap of 47B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBER.NS is priced at ₹7,705.50, while IFBIND.NS trades at ₹1,137.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMBER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 164.28, whereas IFBIND.NS's P/E ratio is 39.25. In terms of profitability, AMBER.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IFBIND.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBER.NS is less volatile compared to IFBIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBER.NS.Check IFBIND.NS's competition here

AMBER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMBER.NS stands at 269.1B. In comparison, BAJAJELEC.NS has a market cap of 44.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBER.NS is priced at ₹7,705.50, while BAJAJELEC.NS trades at ₹383.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMBER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 164.28, whereas BAJAJELEC.NS's P/E ratio is 124.85. In terms of profitability, AMBER.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BAJAJELEC.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBER.NS is more volatile compared to BAJAJELEC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBER.NS.Check BAJAJELEC.NS's competition here

AMBER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMBER.NS stands at 269.1B. In comparison, BAJAJELEC.BO has a market cap of 44.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBER.NS is priced at ₹7,705.50, while BAJAJELEC.BO trades at ₹383.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMBER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 164.28, whereas BAJAJELEC.BO's P/E ratio is 41.14. In terms of profitability, AMBER.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BAJAJELEC.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBER.NS is more volatile compared to BAJAJELEC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBER.NS.Check BAJAJELEC.BO's competition here

AMBER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMBER.NS stands at 269.1B. In comparison, JCHAC.NS has a market cap of 38.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBER.NS is priced at ₹7,705.50, while JCHAC.NS trades at ₹1,432.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMBER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 164.28, whereas JCHAC.NS's P/E ratio is 138.91. In terms of profitability, AMBER.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to JCHAC.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBER.NS is more volatile compared to JCHAC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBER.NS.Check JCHAC.NS's competition here

AMBER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMBER.NS stands at 269.1B. In comparison, JCHAC.BO has a market cap of 38.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBER.NS is priced at ₹7,705.50, while JCHAC.BO trades at ₹1,427.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMBER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 164.28, whereas JCHAC.BO's P/E ratio is 137.83. In terms of profitability, AMBER.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to JCHAC.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBER.NS is more volatile compared to JCHAC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBER.NS.Check JCHAC.BO's competition here

AMBER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMBER.NS stands at 269.1B. In comparison, BOSCH-HCIL.NS has a market cap of 37.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBER.NS is priced at ₹7,705.50, while BOSCH-HCIL.NS trades at ₹1,391.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMBER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 164.28, whereas BOSCH-HCIL.NS's P/E ratio is 314.05. In terms of profitability, AMBER.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BOSCH-HCIL.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBER.NS is more volatile compared to BOSCH-HCIL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBER.NS.Check BOSCH-HCIL.NS's competition here

AMBER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMBER.NS stands at 269.1B. In comparison, ORIENTELEC.NS has a market cap of 37.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBER.NS is priced at ₹7,705.50, while ORIENTELEC.NS trades at ₹174.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMBER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 164.28, whereas ORIENTELEC.NS's P/E ratio is 43.51. In terms of profitability, AMBER.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ORIENTELEC.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBER.NS is less volatile compared to ORIENTELEC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBER.NS.Check ORIENTELEC.NS's competition here

AMBER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMBER.NS stands at 269.1B. In comparison, ORIENTELEC.BO has a market cap of 37.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBER.NS is priced at ₹7,705.50, while ORIENTELEC.BO trades at ₹173.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMBER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 164.28, whereas ORIENTELEC.BO's P/E ratio is 43.44. In terms of profitability, AMBER.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ORIENTELEC.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBER.NS is less volatile compared to ORIENTELEC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBER.NS.Check ORIENTELEC.BO's competition here

AMBER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMBER.NS stands at 269.1B. In comparison, STYLAMIND.BO has a market cap of 37.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBER.NS is priced at ₹7,705.50, while STYLAMIND.BO trades at ₹2,227.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMBER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 164.28, whereas STYLAMIND.BO's P/E ratio is 26.64. In terms of profitability, AMBER.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to STYLAMIND.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBER.NS is less volatile compared to STYLAMIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBER.NS.Check STYLAMIND.BO's competition here

AMBER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMBER.NS stands at 269.1B. In comparison, STYLAMIND.NS has a market cap of 37.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBER.NS is priced at ₹7,705.50, while STYLAMIND.NS trades at ₹2,230.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMBER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 164.28, whereas STYLAMIND.NS's P/E ratio is 26.67. In terms of profitability, AMBER.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to STYLAMIND.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBER.NS is more volatile compared to STYLAMIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBER.NS.Check STYLAMIND.NS's competition here

AMBER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMBER.NS stands at 269.1B. In comparison, BOSCH-HCIL.BO has a market cap of 37.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBER.NS is priced at ₹7,705.50, while BOSCH-HCIL.BO trades at ₹1,374.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMBER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 164.28, whereas BOSCH-HCIL.BO's P/E ratio is 313.39. In terms of profitability, AMBER.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BOSCH-HCIL.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBER.NS is more volatile compared to BOSCH-HCIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBER.NS.Check BOSCH-HCIL.BO's competition here

AMBER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMBER.NS stands at 269.1B. In comparison, BOROLTD.NS has a market cap of 30.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBER.NS is priced at ₹7,705.50, while BOROLTD.NS trades at ₹257.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMBER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 164.28, whereas BOROLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 40.74. In terms of profitability, AMBER.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BOROLTD.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBER.NS is less volatile compared to BOROLTD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBER.NS.Check BOROLTD.NS's competition here

AMBER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMBER.NS stands at 269.1B. In comparison, BOROLTD.BO has a market cap of 30.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBER.NS is priced at ₹7,705.50, while BOROLTD.BO trades at ₹256.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMBER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 164.28, whereas BOROLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 40.59. In terms of profitability, AMBER.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BOROLTD.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBER.NS is less volatile compared to BOROLTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBER.NS.Check BOROLTD.BO's competition here

AMBER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMBER.NS stands at 269.1B. In comparison, CARYSIL.BO has a market cap of 26.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBER.NS is priced at ₹7,705.50, while CARYSIL.BO trades at ₹942.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMBER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 164.28, whereas CARYSIL.BO's P/E ratio is 29.94. In terms of profitability, AMBER.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CARYSIL.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBER.NS is less volatile compared to CARYSIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBER.NS.Check CARYSIL.BO's competition here

AMBER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMBER.NS stands at 269.1B. In comparison, CARYSIL.NS has a market cap of 26.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBER.NS is priced at ₹7,705.50, while CARYSIL.NS trades at ₹944.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMBER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 164.28, whereas CARYSIL.NS's P/E ratio is 29.85. In terms of profitability, AMBER.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CARYSIL.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBER.NS is less volatile compared to CARYSIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBER.NS.Check CARYSIL.NS's competition here

AMBER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMBER.NS stands at 269.1B. In comparison, GREENPANEL.NS has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBER.NS is priced at ₹7,705.50, while GREENPANEL.NS trades at ₹213.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMBER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 164.28, whereas GREENPANEL.NS's P/E ratio is -2388.11. In terms of profitability, AMBER.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GREENPANEL.NS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBER.NS is more volatile compared to GREENPANEL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBER.NS.Check GREENPANEL.NS's competition here

AMBER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMBER.NS stands at 269.1B. In comparison, LAOPALA.NS has a market cap of 22.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBER.NS is priced at ₹7,705.50, while LAOPALA.NS trades at ₹202.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMBER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 164.28, whereas LAOPALA.NS's P/E ratio is 22.33. In terms of profitability, AMBER.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LAOPALA.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBER.NS is less volatile compared to LAOPALA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBER.NS.Check LAOPALA.NS's competition here

AMBER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMBER.NS stands at 269.1B. In comparison, LAOPALA.BO has a market cap of 22.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBER.NS is priced at ₹7,705.50, while LAOPALA.BO trades at ₹202.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMBER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 164.28, whereas LAOPALA.BO's P/E ratio is 22.13. In terms of profitability, AMBER.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LAOPALA.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBER.NS is less volatile compared to LAOPALA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBER.NS.Check LAOPALA.BO's competition here

AMBER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMBER.NS stands at 269.1B. In comparison, NILKAMAL.NS has a market cap of 20.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBER.NS is priced at ₹7,705.50, while NILKAMAL.NS trades at ₹1,418.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMBER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 164.28, whereas NILKAMAL.NS's P/E ratio is 19.34. In terms of profitability, AMBER.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NILKAMAL.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBER.NS is less volatile compared to NILKAMAL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBER.NS.Check NILKAMAL.NS's competition here

AMBER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMBER.NS stands at 269.1B. In comparison, NILKAMAL.BO has a market cap of 20.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBER.NS is priced at ₹7,705.50, while NILKAMAL.BO trades at ₹1,418.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMBER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 164.28, whereas NILKAMAL.BO's P/E ratio is 19.30. In terms of profitability, AMBER.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NILKAMAL.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBER.NS is more volatile compared to NILKAMAL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBER.NS.Check NILKAMAL.BO's competition here

AMBER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMBER.NS stands at 269.1B. In comparison, HINDWAREAP.NS has a market cap of 19.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBER.NS is priced at ₹7,705.50, while HINDWAREAP.NS trades at ₹228.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMBER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 164.28, whereas HINDWAREAP.NS's P/E ratio is -24.84. In terms of profitability, AMBER.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HINDWAREAP.NS's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBER.NS is less volatile compared to HINDWAREAP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBER.NS.Check HINDWAREAP.NS's competition here

AMBER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMBER.NS stands at 269.1B. In comparison, HINDWAREAP.BO has a market cap of 19.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBER.NS is priced at ₹7,705.50, while HINDWAREAP.BO trades at ₹227.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMBER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 164.28, whereas HINDWAREAP.BO's P/E ratio is -24.71. In terms of profitability, AMBER.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HINDWAREAP.BO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBER.NS is less volatile compared to HINDWAREAP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBER.NS.Check HINDWAREAP.BO's competition here

AMBER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMBER.NS stands at 269.1B. In comparison, WEL.BO has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBER.NS is priced at ₹7,705.50, while WEL.BO trades at ₹140.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMBER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 164.28, whereas WEL.BO's P/E ratio is 104.41. In terms of profitability, AMBER.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WEL.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBER.NS is more volatile compared to WEL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBER.NS.Check WEL.BO's competition here

AMBER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMBER.NS stands at 269.1B. In comparison, WEL.NS has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBER.NS is priced at ₹7,705.50, while WEL.NS trades at ₹140.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMBER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 164.28, whereas WEL.NS's P/E ratio is 104.27. In terms of profitability, AMBER.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WEL.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBER.NS is more volatile compared to WEL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBER.NS.Check WEL.NS's competition here

AMBER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMBER.NS stands at 269.1B. In comparison, STOVEKRAFT.NS has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBER.NS is priced at ₹7,705.50, while STOVEKRAFT.NS trades at ₹515.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMBER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 164.28, whereas STOVEKRAFT.NS's P/E ratio is 44.58. In terms of profitability, AMBER.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to STOVEKRAFT.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBER.NS is less volatile compared to STOVEKRAFT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBER.NS.Check STOVEKRAFT.NS's competition here

AMBER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMBER.NS stands at 269.1B. In comparison, STOVEKRAFT.BO has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBER.NS is priced at ₹7,705.50, while STOVEKRAFT.BO trades at ₹513.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMBER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 164.28, whereas STOVEKRAFT.BO's P/E ratio is 44.50. In terms of profitability, AMBER.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to STOVEKRAFT.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBER.NS is less volatile compared to STOVEKRAFT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBER.NS.Check STOVEKRAFT.BO's competition here

AMBER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMBER.NS stands at 269.1B. In comparison, BUTTERFLY.NS has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBER.NS is priced at ₹7,705.50, while BUTTERFLY.NS trades at ₹599.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMBER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 164.28, whereas BUTTERFLY.NS's P/E ratio is 24.90. In terms of profitability, AMBER.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BUTTERFLY.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBER.NS is less volatile compared to BUTTERFLY.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBER.NS.Check BUTTERFLY.NS's competition here

AMBER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMBER.NS stands at 269.1B. In comparison, BUTTERFLY.BO has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBER.NS is priced at ₹7,705.50, while BUTTERFLY.BO trades at ₹610.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMBER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 164.28, whereas BUTTERFLY.BO's P/E ratio is 24.75. In terms of profitability, AMBER.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BUTTERFLY.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBER.NS is less volatile compared to BUTTERFLY.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBER.NS.Check BUTTERFLY.BO's competition here

AMBER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMBER.NS stands at 269.1B. In comparison, SAINTGOBAIN.BO has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBER.NS is priced at ₹7,705.50, while SAINTGOBAIN.BO trades at ₹113.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMBER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 164.28, whereas SAINTGOBAIN.BO's P/E ratio is 28.70. In terms of profitability, AMBER.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SAINTGOBAIN.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBER.NS is more volatile compared to SAINTGOBAIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBER.NS.Check SAINTGOBAIN.BO's competition here

AMBER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMBER.NS stands at 269.1B. In comparison, STANLEY.NS has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBER.NS is priced at ₹7,705.50, while STANLEY.NS trades at ₹171.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMBER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 164.28, whereas STANLEY.NS's P/E ratio is 41.34. In terms of profitability, AMBER.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to STANLEY.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBER.NS is less volatile compared to STANLEY.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBER.NS.Check STANLEY.NS's competition here

AMBER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMBER.NS stands at 269.1B. In comparison, MIRCELECTR.BO has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBER.NS is priced at ₹7,705.50, while MIRCELECTR.BO trades at ₹29.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMBER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 164.28, whereas MIRCELECTR.BO's P/E ratio is -43.09. In terms of profitability, AMBER.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MIRCELECTR.BO's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBER.NS is less volatile compared to MIRCELECTR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBER.NS.Check MIRCELECTR.BO's competition here

AMBER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMBER.NS stands at 269.1B. In comparison, MIRCELECTR.NS has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBER.NS is priced at ₹7,705.50, while MIRCELECTR.NS trades at ₹30.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMBER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 164.28, whereas MIRCELECTR.NS's P/E ratio is -33.86. In terms of profitability, AMBER.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MIRCELECTR.NS's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBER.NS is less volatile compared to MIRCELECTR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBER.NS.Check MIRCELECTR.NS's competition here

AMBER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMBER.NS stands at 269.1B. In comparison, ROBU.BO has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBER.NS is priced at ₹7,705.50, while ROBU.BO trades at ₹852.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMBER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 164.28, whereas ROBU.BO's P/E ratio is 39.06. In terms of profitability, AMBER.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ROBU.BO's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBER.NS is less volatile compared to ROBU.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBER.NS.Check ROBU.BO's competition here

AMBER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMBER.NS stands at 269.1B. In comparison, RUSHIL.NS has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBER.NS is priced at ₹7,705.50, while RUSHIL.NS trades at ₹19.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMBER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 164.28, whereas RUSHIL.NS's P/E ratio is 57.88. In terms of profitability, AMBER.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RUSHIL.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBER.NS is less volatile compared to RUSHIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBER.NS.Check RUSHIL.NS's competition here

AMBER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMBER.NS stands at 269.1B. In comparison, RUSHIL.BO has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBER.NS is priced at ₹7,705.50, while RUSHIL.BO trades at ₹19.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMBER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 164.28, whereas RUSHIL.BO's P/E ratio is 57.67. In terms of profitability, AMBER.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RUSHIL.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBER.NS is more volatile compared to RUSHIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBER.NS.Check RUSHIL.BO's competition here

AMBER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMBER.NS stands at 269.1B. In comparison, WIMPLAST.BO has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBER.NS is priced at ₹7,705.50, while WIMPLAST.BO trades at ₹406.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMBER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 164.28, whereas WIMPLAST.BO's P/E ratio is 7.94. In terms of profitability, AMBER.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WIMPLAST.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBER.NS is more volatile compared to WIMPLAST.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBER.NS.Check WIMPLAST.BO's competition here

AMBER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMBER.NS stands at 269.1B. In comparison, SINGER.BO has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBER.NS is priced at ₹7,705.50, while SINGER.BO trades at ₹69.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMBER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 164.28, whereas SINGER.BO's P/E ratio is 64.53. In terms of profitability, AMBER.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SINGER.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBER.NS is less volatile compared to SINGER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBER.NS.Check SINGER.BO's competition here

AMBER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMBER.NS stands at 269.1B. In comparison, FOCUS.NS has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBER.NS is priced at ₹7,705.50, while FOCUS.NS trades at ₹65.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMBER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 164.28, whereas FOCUS.NS's P/E ratio is 90.41. In terms of profitability, AMBER.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FOCUS.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBER.NS is less volatile compared to FOCUS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBER.NS.Check FOCUS.NS's competition here

AMBER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMBER.NS stands at 269.1B. In comparison, BELLACASA.BO has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBER.NS is priced at ₹7,705.50, while BELLACASA.BO trades at ₹292.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMBER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 164.28, whereas BELLACASA.BO's P/E ratio is 19.50. In terms of profitability, AMBER.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BELLACASA.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBER.NS is less volatile compared to BELLACASA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBER.NS.Check BELLACASA.BO's competition here

AMBER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMBER.NS stands at 269.1B. In comparison, SPITZE.BO has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBER.NS is priced at ₹7,705.50, while SPITZE.BO trades at ₹226.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMBER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 164.28, whereas SPITZE.BO's P/E ratio is 54.02. In terms of profitability, AMBER.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SPITZE.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBER.NS is more volatile compared to SPITZE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBER.NS.Check SPITZE.BO's competition here

AMBER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMBER.NS stands at 269.1B. In comparison, BHATIA.BO has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBER.NS is priced at ₹7,705.50, while BHATIA.BO trades at ₹23.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMBER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 164.28, whereas BHATIA.BO's P/E ratio is 23.40. In terms of profitability, AMBER.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BHATIA.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBER.NS is less volatile compared to BHATIA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBER.NS.Check BHATIA.BO's competition here

AMBER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMBER.NS stands at 269.1B. In comparison, VIDEOIND.NS has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBER.NS is priced at ₹7,705.50, while VIDEOIND.NS trades at ₹7.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMBER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 164.28, whereas VIDEOIND.NS's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, AMBER.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VIDEOIND.NS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBER.NS is less volatile compared to VIDEOIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBER.NS.Check VIDEOIND.NS's competition here

AMBER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMBER.NS stands at 269.1B. In comparison, INFLAME.BO has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBER.NS is priced at ₹7,705.50, while INFLAME.BO trades at ₹301.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMBER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 164.28, whereas INFLAME.BO's P/E ratio is 40.57. In terms of profitability, AMBER.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to INFLAME.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBER.NS is less volatile compared to INFLAME.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBER.NS.Check INFLAME.BO's competition here

AMBER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMBER.NS stands at 269.1B. In comparison, PILITA.BO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBER.NS is priced at ₹7,705.50, while PILITA.BO trades at ₹8.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMBER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 164.28, whereas PILITA.BO's P/E ratio is 49.44. In terms of profitability, AMBER.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PILITA.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBER.NS is less volatile compared to PILITA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBER.NS.Check PILITA.BO's competition here

AMBER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMBER.NS stands at 269.1B. In comparison, PILITA.NS has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBER.NS is priced at ₹7,705.50, while PILITA.NS trades at ₹8.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMBER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 164.28, whereas PILITA.NS's P/E ratio is 48.67. In terms of profitability, AMBER.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PILITA.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBER.NS is less volatile compared to PILITA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBER.NS.Check PILITA.NS's competition here

AMBER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMBER.NS stands at 269.1B. In comparison, SONAMLTD.NS has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBER.NS is priced at ₹7,705.50, while SONAMLTD.NS trades at ₹46.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMBER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 164.28, whereas SONAMLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 28.93. In terms of profitability, AMBER.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SONAMLTD.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBER.NS is less volatile compared to SONAMLTD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBER.NS.Check SONAMLTD.NS's competition here

AMBER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMBER.NS stands at 269.1B. In comparison, AVROIND.BO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBER.NS is priced at ₹7,705.50, while AVROIND.BO trades at ₹127.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMBER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 164.28, whereas AVROIND.BO's P/E ratio is 44.44. In terms of profitability, AMBER.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AVROIND.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBER.NS is less volatile compared to AVROIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBER.NS.Check AVROIND.BO's competition here

AMBER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMBER.NS stands at 269.1B. In comparison, AVROIND.NS has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBER.NS is priced at ₹7,705.50, while AVROIND.NS trades at ₹125.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMBER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 164.28, whereas AVROIND.NS's P/E ratio is 43.09. In terms of profitability, AMBER.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AVROIND.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBER.NS is more volatile compared to AVROIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBER.NS.Check AVROIND.NS's competition here

AMBER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMBER.NS stands at 269.1B. In comparison, SONAMCLOCK.NS has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBER.NS is priced at ₹7,705.50, while SONAMCLOCK.NS trades at ₹81.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMBER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 164.28, whereas SONAMCLOCK.NS's P/E ratio is 40.88. In terms of profitability, AMBER.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SONAMCLOCK.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBER.NS is less volatile compared to SONAMCLOCK.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBER.NS.Check SONAMCLOCK.NS's competition here

AMBER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMBER.NS stands at 269.1B. In comparison, AIROLAM.NS has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBER.NS is priced at ₹7,705.50, while AIROLAM.NS trades at ₹94.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMBER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 164.28, whereas AIROLAM.NS's P/E ratio is 51.26. In terms of profitability, AMBER.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AIROLAM.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBER.NS is less volatile compared to AIROLAM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBER.NS.Check AIROLAM.NS's competition here

AMBER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMBER.NS stands at 269.1B. In comparison, PRIMAPLA.BO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBER.NS is priced at ₹7,705.50, while PRIMAPLA.BO trades at ₹118.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMBER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 164.28, whereas PRIMAPLA.BO's P/E ratio is 7.67. In terms of profitability, AMBER.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PRIMAPLA.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBER.NS is less volatile compared to PRIMAPLA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBER.NS.Check PRIMAPLA.BO's competition here

AMBER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMBER.NS stands at 269.1B. In comparison, TEXELIN.BO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBER.NS is priced at ₹7,705.50, while TEXELIN.BO trades at ₹83.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMBER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 164.28, whereas TEXELIN.BO's P/E ratio is 5.06. In terms of profitability, AMBER.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TEXELIN.BO's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBER.NS is less volatile compared to TEXELIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBER.NS.Check TEXELIN.BO's competition here

AMBER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMBER.NS stands at 269.1B. In comparison, FOCUS.BO has a market cap of 982.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBER.NS is priced at ₹7,705.50, while FOCUS.BO trades at ₹135.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMBER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 164.28, whereas FOCUS.BO's P/E ratio is 83.85. In terms of profitability, AMBER.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FOCUS.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBER.NS is more volatile compared to FOCUS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBER.NS.Check FOCUS.BO's competition here

AMBER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMBER.NS stands at 269.1B. In comparison, PRITI.NS has a market cap of 647.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBER.NS is priced at ₹7,705.50, while PRITI.NS trades at ₹48.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMBER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 164.28, whereas PRITI.NS's P/E ratio is 18.36. In terms of profitability, AMBER.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PRITI.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBER.NS is less volatile compared to PRITI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBER.NS.Check PRITI.NS's competition here

AMBER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMBER.NS stands at 269.1B. In comparison, SACHEMT.BO has a market cap of 492.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBER.NS is priced at ₹7,705.50, while SACHEMT.BO trades at ₹3.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMBER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 164.28, whereas SACHEMT.BO's P/E ratio is 21.89. In terms of profitability, AMBER.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SACHEMT.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBER.NS is less volatile compared to SACHEMT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBER.NS.Check SACHEMT.BO's competition here

AMBER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMBER.NS stands at 269.1B. In comparison, KHAITANLTD.NS has a market cap of 447.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBER.NS is priced at ₹7,705.50, while KHAITANLTD.NS trades at ₹97.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMBER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 164.28, whereas KHAITANLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 6.82. In terms of profitability, AMBER.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KHAITANLTD.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBER.NS is less volatile compared to KHAITANLTD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBER.NS.Check KHAITANLTD.NS's competition here

AMBER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMBER.NS stands at 269.1B. In comparison, KHAITANLTD.BO has a market cap of 440.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBER.NS is priced at ₹7,705.50, while KHAITANLTD.BO trades at ₹94.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMBER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 164.28, whereas KHAITANLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 6.71. In terms of profitability, AMBER.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KHAITANLTD.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBER.NS is less volatile compared to KHAITANLTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBER.NS.Check KHAITANLTD.BO's competition here

AMBER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMBER.NS stands at 269.1B. In comparison, ADL.BO has a market cap of 422.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBER.NS is priced at ₹7,705.50, while ADL.BO trades at ₹75.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMBER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 164.28, whereas ADL.BO's P/E ratio is 3795.00. In terms of profitability, AMBER.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ADL.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBER.NS is less volatile compared to ADL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBER.NS.Check ADL.BO's competition here

AMBER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMBER.NS stands at 269.1B. In comparison, ADL.NS has a market cap of 397.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBER.NS is priced at ₹7,705.50, while ADL.NS trades at ₹71.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMBER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 164.28, whereas ADL.NS's P/E ratio is 3571.00. In terms of profitability, AMBER.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ADL.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBER.NS is less volatile compared to ADL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBER.NS.Check ADL.NS's competition here

AMBER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMBER.NS stands at 269.1B. In comparison, GORANIN.BO has a market cap of 328M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBER.NS is priced at ₹7,705.50, while GORANIN.BO trades at ₹71.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMBER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 164.28, whereas GORANIN.BO's P/E ratio is 27.80. In terms of profitability, AMBER.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GORANIN.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBER.NS is less volatile compared to GORANIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBER.NS.Check GORANIN.BO's competition here

AMBER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMBER.NS stands at 269.1B. In comparison, TIRUFOAM.BO has a market cap of 302.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBER.NS is priced at ₹7,705.50, while TIRUFOAM.BO trades at ₹72.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMBER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 164.28, whereas TIRUFOAM.BO's P/E ratio is 13.80. In terms of profitability, AMBER.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TIRUFOAM.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBER.NS is more volatile compared to TIRUFOAM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBER.NS.Check TIRUFOAM.BO's competition here

AMBER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMBER.NS stands at 269.1B. In comparison, GUJRAFIA.BO has a market cap of 300.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBER.NS is priced at ₹7,705.50, while GUJRAFIA.BO trades at ₹55.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMBER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 164.28, whereas GUJRAFIA.BO's P/E ratio is 94.24. In terms of profitability, AMBER.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GUJRAFIA.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBER.NS is more volatile compared to GUJRAFIA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBER.NS.Check GUJRAFIA.BO's competition here

AMBER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMBER.NS stands at 269.1B. In comparison, MILEFUR.BO has a market cap of 255.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBER.NS is priced at ₹7,705.50, while MILEFUR.BO trades at ₹27.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMBER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 164.28, whereas MILEFUR.BO's P/E ratio is -68.75. In terms of profitability, AMBER.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MILEFUR.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBER.NS is less volatile compared to MILEFUR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBER.NS.Check MILEFUR.BO's competition here

AMBER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMBER.NS stands at 269.1B. In comparison, JAIMATAG.BO has a market cap of 176M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBER.NS is priced at ₹7,705.50, while JAIMATAG.BO trades at ₹1.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMBER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 164.28, whereas JAIMATAG.BO's P/E ratio is -25.14. In terms of profitability, AMBER.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to JAIMATAG.BO's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBER.NS is less volatile compared to JAIMATAG.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBER.NS.Check JAIMATAG.BO's competition here

AMBER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMBER.NS stands at 269.1B. In comparison, JAIPAN.BO has a market cap of 156.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBER.NS is priced at ₹7,705.50, while JAIPAN.BO trades at ₹25.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMBER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 164.28, whereas JAIPAN.BO's P/E ratio is 28.88. In terms of profitability, AMBER.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to JAIPAN.BO's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBER.NS is less volatile compared to JAIPAN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBER.NS.Check JAIPAN.BO's competition here

AMBER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMBER.NS stands at 269.1B. In comparison, KAHAN.BO has a market cap of 133.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBER.NS is priced at ₹7,705.50, while KAHAN.BO trades at ₹49.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMBER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 164.28, whereas KAHAN.BO's P/E ratio is 11.56. In terms of profitability, AMBER.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KAHAN.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBER.NS is more volatile compared to KAHAN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBER.NS.Check KAHAN.BO's competition here

AMBER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMBER.NS stands at 269.1B. In comparison, APIL.BO has a market cap of 129.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBER.NS is priced at ₹7,705.50, while APIL.BO trades at ₹37.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMBER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 164.28, whereas APIL.BO's P/E ratio is -13.59. In terms of profitability, AMBER.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to APIL.BO's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBER.NS is more volatile compared to APIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBER.NS.Check APIL.BO's competition here

AMBER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMBER.NS stands at 269.1B. In comparison, SEASONST.BO has a market cap of 128.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBER.NS is priced at ₹7,705.50, while SEASONST.BO trades at ₹18.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMBER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 164.28, whereas SEASONST.BO's P/E ratio is -156.45. In terms of profitability, AMBER.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SEASONST.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBER.NS is less volatile compared to SEASONST.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBER.NS.Check SEASONST.BO's competition here

AMBER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMBER.NS stands at 269.1B. In comparison, MPL.BO has a market cap of 99.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBER.NS is priced at ₹7,705.50, while MPL.BO trades at ₹7.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMBER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 164.28, whereas MPL.BO's P/E ratio is -21.59. In terms of profitability, AMBER.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MPL.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBER.NS is less volatile compared to MPL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBER.NS.Check MPL.BO's competition here

AMBER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMBER.NS stands at 269.1B. In comparison, PHOTOQUP.BO has a market cap of 96.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBER.NS is priced at ₹7,705.50, while PHOTOQUP.BO trades at ₹16.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMBER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 164.28, whereas PHOTOQUP.BO's P/E ratio is 69.78. In terms of profitability, AMBER.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PHOTOQUP.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBER.NS is more volatile compared to PHOTOQUP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBER.NS.Check PHOTOQUP.BO's competition here

AMBER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMBER.NS stands at 269.1B. In comparison, KUWERIN.BO has a market cap of 77M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBER.NS is priced at ₹7,705.50, while KUWERIN.BO trades at ₹8.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMBER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 164.28, whereas KUWERIN.BO's P/E ratio is 14.88. In terms of profitability, AMBER.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KUWERIN.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBER.NS is less volatile compared to KUWERIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBER.NS.Check KUWERIN.BO's competition here

AMBER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMBER.NS stands at 269.1B. In comparison, GOLCA.BO has a market cap of 65.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBER.NS is priced at ₹7,705.50, while GOLCA.BO trades at ₹10.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMBER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 164.28, whereas GOLCA.BO's P/E ratio is 1007.00. In terms of profitability, AMBER.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GOLCA.BO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBER.NS is less volatile compared to GOLCA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBER.NS.Check GOLCA.BO's competition here

AMBER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMBER.NS stands at 269.1B. In comparison, JIKIND.NS has a market cap of 47.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBER.NS is priced at ₹7,705.50, while JIKIND.NS trades at ₹0.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMBER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 164.28, whereas JIKIND.NS's P/E ratio is -21.67. In terms of profitability, AMBER.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to JIKIND.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBER.NS is less volatile compared to JIKIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBER.NS.Check JIKIND.NS's competition here

AMBER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMBER.NS stands at 269.1B. In comparison, WFL.NS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AMBER.NS is priced at ₹7,705.50, while WFL.NS trades at ₹269.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMBER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 164.28, whereas WFL.NS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMBER.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WFL.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBER.NS is more volatile compared to WFL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBER.NS.Check WFL.NS's competition here

AMBER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMBER.NS stands at 269.1B. In comparison, EUREKAFORBE.BO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AMBER.NS is priced at ₹7,705.50, while EUREKAFORBE.BO trades at ₹502.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMBER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 164.28, whereas EUREKAFORBE.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMBER.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EUREKAFORBE.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBER.NS is less volatile compared to EUREKAFORBE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBER.NS.Check EUREKAFORBE.BO's competition here

AMBER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMBER.NS stands at 269.1B. In comparison, ELIL.BO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AMBER.NS is priced at ₹7,705.50, while ELIL.BO trades at ₹202.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMBER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 164.28, whereas ELIL.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMBER.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ELIL.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AMBER.NS is more volatile compared to ELIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBER.NS.Check ELIL.BO's competition here

AMBER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMBER.NS stands at 269.1B. In comparison, SHIL.NS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AMBER.NS is priced at ₹7,705.50, while SHIL.NS trades at ₹272.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMBER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 164.28, whereas SHIL.NS's P/E ratio is 9.77. In terms of profitability, AMBER.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SHIL.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBER.NS is less volatile compared to SHIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBER.NS.Check SHIL.NS's competition here

AMBER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMBER.NS stands at 269.1B. In comparison, ACRYSIL.NS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AMBER.NS is priced at ₹7,705.50, while ACRYSIL.NS trades at ₹494.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMBER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 164.28, whereas ACRYSIL.NS's P/E ratio is 21.59. In terms of profitability, AMBER.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ACRYSIL.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBER.NS is more volatile compared to ACRYSIL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBER.NS.Check ACRYSIL.NS's competition here

AMBER.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AMBER.NS stands at 269.1B. In comparison, HSIL.NS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AMBER.NS is priced at ₹7,705.50, while HSIL.NS trades at ₹298.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AMBER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 164.28, whereas HSIL.NS's P/E ratio is 18.70. In terms of profitability, AMBER.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HSIL.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBER.NS is less volatile compared to HSIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBER.NS.Check HSIL.NS's competition here