Alsea, S.A.B. de C.V.
Alsea, S.A.B. de C.V. (ALSSF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (ALSSF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Restaurants Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ALSSF | $3.69 | +6.65% | 3B | -184.50 | -$0.02 | +2.45% |
| CMPGF | $30.09 | +0.45% | 50.5B | 27.02 | $1.10 | +2.22% |
| CMPGY | $30.24 | +3.85% | 50.3B | 26.88 | $1.10 | +2.16% |
| RSTRF | $68.05 | +0.00% | 22.8B | 25.68 | $2.65 | +3.62% |
| LKNCY | $36.91 | -3.02% | 12.1B | 21.65 | $1.75 | N/A |
| HDALF | $1.94 | +0.00% | 11.7B | 18.00 | $0.12 | +5.00% |
| MDNDF | $42.00 | +0.00% | 5.6B | 25.61 | $1.64 | +0.85% |
| JBFCF | $3.73 | +0.68% | 4.2B | 23.25 | $0.16 | +1.61% |
| JBFCY | $15.11 | +5.04% | 4.1B | 23.65 | $0.62 | +1.61% |
| ATGSY | $6.55 | +0.00% | 2.5B | -40.94 | -$0.16 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
ALSSF vs CMPGF Comparison February 2026
ALSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALSSF stands at 3B. In comparison, CMPGF has a market cap of 50.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ALSSF is priced at $3.69, while CMPGF trades at $30.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALSSF currently has a P/E ratio of -184.50, whereas CMPGF's P/E ratio is 27.02. In terms of profitability, ALSSF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CMPGF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ALSSF is less volatile compared to CMPGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALSSF.Check CMPGF's competition here
ALSSF vs CMPGY Comparison February 2026
ALSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALSSF stands at 3B. In comparison, CMPGY has a market cap of 50.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ALSSF is priced at $3.69, while CMPGY trades at $30.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALSSF currently has a P/E ratio of -184.50, whereas CMPGY's P/E ratio is 26.88. In terms of profitability, ALSSF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CMPGY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ALSSF is less volatile compared to CMPGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALSSF.Check CMPGY's competition here
ALSSF vs RSTRF Comparison February 2026
ALSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALSSF stands at 3B. In comparison, RSTRF has a market cap of 22.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ALSSF is priced at $3.69, while RSTRF trades at $68.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALSSF currently has a P/E ratio of -184.50, whereas RSTRF's P/E ratio is 25.68. In terms of profitability, ALSSF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to RSTRF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ALSSF and RSTRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RSTRF's competition here
ALSSF vs LKNCY Comparison February 2026
ALSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALSSF stands at 3B. In comparison, LKNCY has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ALSSF is priced at $3.69, while LKNCY trades at $36.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALSSF currently has a P/E ratio of -184.50, whereas LKNCY's P/E ratio is 21.65. In terms of profitability, ALSSF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to LKNCY's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, ALSSF is less volatile compared to LKNCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALSSF.Check LKNCY's competition here
ALSSF vs HDALF Comparison February 2026
ALSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALSSF stands at 3B. In comparison, HDALF has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ALSSF is priced at $3.69, while HDALF trades at $1.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALSSF currently has a P/E ratio of -184.50, whereas HDALF's P/E ratio is 18.00. In terms of profitability, ALSSF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to HDALF's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, ALSSF and HDALF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HDALF's competition here
ALSSF vs MDNDF Comparison February 2026
ALSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALSSF stands at 3B. In comparison, MDNDF has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ALSSF is priced at $3.69, while MDNDF trades at $42.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALSSF currently has a P/E ratio of -184.50, whereas MDNDF's P/E ratio is 25.61. In terms of profitability, ALSSF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MDNDF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ALSSF and MDNDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MDNDF's competition here
ALSSF vs JBFCF Comparison February 2026
ALSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALSSF stands at 3B. In comparison, JBFCF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ALSSF is priced at $3.69, while JBFCF trades at $3.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALSSF currently has a P/E ratio of -184.50, whereas JBFCF's P/E ratio is 23.25. In terms of profitability, ALSSF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to JBFCF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ALSSF is less volatile compared to JBFCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALSSF.Check JBFCF's competition here
ALSSF vs JBFCY Comparison February 2026
ALSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALSSF stands at 3B. In comparison, JBFCY has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ALSSF is priced at $3.69, while JBFCY trades at $15.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALSSF currently has a P/E ratio of -184.50, whereas JBFCY's P/E ratio is 23.65. In terms of profitability, ALSSF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to JBFCY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ALSSF is less volatile compared to JBFCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALSSF.Check JBFCY's competition here
ALSSF vs ATGSY Comparison February 2026
ALSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALSSF stands at 3B. In comparison, ATGSY has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ALSSF is priced at $3.69, while ATGSY trades at $6.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALSSF currently has a P/E ratio of -184.50, whereas ATGSY's P/E ratio is -40.94. In terms of profitability, ALSSF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ATGSY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ALSSF and ATGSY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ATGSY's competition here
ALSSF vs SKLYF Comparison February 2026
ALSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALSSF stands at 3B. In comparison, SKLYF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ALSSF is priced at $3.69, while SKLYF trades at $10.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALSSF currently has a P/E ratio of -184.50, whereas SKLYF's P/E ratio is 152.86. In terms of profitability, ALSSF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SKLYF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ALSSF and SKLYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SKLYF's competition here
ALSSF vs ATGSF Comparison February 2026
ALSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALSSF stands at 3B. In comparison, ATGSF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ALSSF is priced at $3.69, while ATGSF trades at $5.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALSSF currently has a P/E ratio of -184.50, whereas ATGSF's P/E ratio is -37.53. In terms of profitability, ALSSF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ATGSF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ALSSF and ATGSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ATGSF's competition here
ALSSF vs MBPFF Comparison February 2026
ALSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALSSF stands at 3B. In comparison, MBPFF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, ALSSF is priced at $3.69, while MBPFF trades at $3.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALSSF currently has a P/E ratio of -184.50, whereas MBPFF's P/E ratio is 8.53. In terms of profitability, ALSSF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MBPFF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ALSSF and MBPFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MBPFF's competition here
ALSSF vs SGLOF Comparison February 2026
ALSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALSSF stands at 3B. In comparison, SGLOF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, ALSSF is priced at $3.69, while SGLOF trades at $17.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALSSF currently has a P/E ratio of -184.50, whereas SGLOF's P/E ratio is 29.71. In terms of profitability, ALSSF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SGLOF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ALSSF and SGLOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SGLOF's competition here
ALSSF vs SSPPF Comparison February 2026
ALSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALSSF stands at 3B. In comparison, SSPPF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, ALSSF is priced at $3.69, while SSPPF trades at $2.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALSSF currently has a P/E ratio of -184.50, whereas SSPPF's P/E ratio is -19.31. In terms of profitability, ALSSF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SSPPF's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, ALSSF and SSPPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SSPPF's competition here
ALSSF vs ARHOF Comparison February 2026
ALSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALSSF stands at 3B. In comparison, ARHOF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ALSSF is priced at $3.69, while ARHOF trades at $8.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALSSF currently has a P/E ratio of -184.50, whereas ARHOF's P/E ratio is -9.57. In terms of profitability, ALSSF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ARHOF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ALSSF and ARHOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ARHOF's competition here
ALSSF vs DMZPY Comparison February 2026
ALSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALSSF stands at 3B. In comparison, DMZPY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ALSSF is priced at $3.69, while DMZPY trades at $6.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALSSF currently has a P/E ratio of -184.50, whereas DMZPY's P/E ratio is -811.00. In terms of profitability, ALSSF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to DMZPY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ALSSF is less volatile compared to DMZPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALSSF.Check DMZPY's competition here
ALSSF vs DPZUF Comparison February 2026
ALSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALSSF stands at 3B. In comparison, DPZUF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ALSSF is priced at $3.69, while DPZUF trades at $14.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALSSF currently has a P/E ratio of -184.50, whereas DPZUF's P/E ratio is -489.67. In terms of profitability, ALSSF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to DPZUF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ALSSF and DPZUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DPZUF's competition here
ALSSF vs ELORY Comparison February 2026
ALSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALSSF stands at 3B. In comparison, ELORY has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ALSSF is priced at $3.69, while ELORY trades at $4.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALSSF currently has a P/E ratio of -184.50, whereas ELORY's P/E ratio is -2.48. In terms of profitability, ALSSF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ELORY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ALSSF and ELORY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ELORY's competition here
ALSSF vs DPUKY Comparison February 2026
ALSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALSSF stands at 3B. In comparison, DPUKY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ALSSF is priced at $3.69, while DPUKY trades at $5.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALSSF currently has a P/E ratio of -184.50, whereas DPUKY's P/E ratio is 10.17. In terms of profitability, ALSSF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to DPUKY's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, ALSSF and DPUKY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DPUKY's competition here
ALSSF vs WHCA Comparison February 2026
ALSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALSSF stands at 3B. In comparison, WHCA has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, ALSSF is priced at $3.69, while WHCA trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALSSF currently has a P/E ratio of -184.50, whereas WHCA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALSSF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to WHCA's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, ALSSF is less volatile compared to WHCA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALSSF.Check WHCA's competition here
ALSSF vs JDWPY Comparison February 2026
ALSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALSSF stands at 3B. In comparison, JDWPY has a market cap of 986M. Regarding current trading prices, ALSSF is priced at $3.69, while JDWPY trades at $44.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALSSF currently has a P/E ratio of -184.50, whereas JDWPY's P/E ratio is 11.58. In terms of profitability, ALSSF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to JDWPY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ALSSF and JDWPY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check JDWPY's competition here
ALSSF vs JDWPF Comparison February 2026
ALSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALSSF stands at 3B. In comparison, JDWPF has a market cap of 930.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ALSSF is priced at $3.69, while JDWPF trades at $8.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALSSF currently has a P/E ratio of -184.50, whereas JDWPF's P/E ratio is 11.32. In terms of profitability, ALSSF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to JDWPF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ALSSF and JDWPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check JDWPF's competition here
ALSSF vs HLFFF Comparison February 2026
ALSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALSSF stands at 3B. In comparison, HLFFF has a market cap of 887M. Regarding current trading prices, ALSSF is priced at $3.69, while HLFFF trades at $5.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALSSF currently has a P/E ratio of -184.50, whereas HLFFF's P/E ratio is -4.41. In terms of profitability, ALSSF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to HLFFF's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ALSSF and HLFFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HLFFF's competition here
ALSSF vs ELROF Comparison February 2026
ALSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALSSF stands at 3B. In comparison, ELROF has a market cap of 842.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ALSSF is priced at $3.69, while ELROF trades at $3.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALSSF currently has a P/E ratio of -184.50, whereas ELROF's P/E ratio is 8.32. In terms of profitability, ALSSF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ELROF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ALSSF and ELROF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ELROF's competition here
ALSSF vs DMPZF Comparison February 2026
ALSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALSSF stands at 3B. In comparison, DMPZF has a market cap of 839.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ALSSF is priced at $3.69, while DMPZF trades at $2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALSSF currently has a P/E ratio of -184.50, whereas DMPZF's P/E ratio is 8.15. In terms of profitability, ALSSF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to DMPZF's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, ALSSF and DMPZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DMPZF's competition here
ALSSF vs HELFY Comparison February 2026
ALSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALSSF stands at 3B. In comparison, HELFY has a market cap of 833.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ALSSF is priced at $3.69, while HELFY trades at $1.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALSSF currently has a P/E ratio of -184.50, whereas HELFY's P/E ratio is -4.20. In terms of profitability, ALSSF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to HELFY's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ALSSF is less volatile compared to HELFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALSSF.Check HELFY's competition here
ALSSF vs CLLFF Comparison February 2026
ALSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALSSF stands at 3B. In comparison, CLLFF has a market cap of 815.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ALSSF is priced at $3.69, while CLLFF trades at $6.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALSSF currently has a P/E ratio of -184.50, whereas CLLFF's P/E ratio is 138.00. In terms of profitability, ALSSF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CLLFF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ALSSF and CLLFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CLLFF's competition here
ALSSF vs MTYFF Comparison February 2026
ALSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALSSF stands at 3B. In comparison, MTYFF has a market cap of 718.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ALSSF is priced at $3.69, while MTYFF trades at $30.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALSSF currently has a P/E ratio of -184.50, whereas MTYFF's P/E ratio is 28.87. In terms of profitability, ALSSF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MTYFF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ALSSF is less volatile compared to MTYFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALSSF.Check MTYFF's competition here
ALSSF vs RSTGF Comparison February 2026
ALSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALSSF stands at 3B. In comparison, RSTGF has a market cap of 649.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ALSSF is priced at $3.69, while RSTGF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALSSF currently has a P/E ratio of -184.50, whereas RSTGF's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, ALSSF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to RSTGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ALSSF and RSTGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RSTGF's competition here
ALSSF vs MARZF Comparison February 2026
ALSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALSSF stands at 3B. In comparison, MARZF has a market cap of 510.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ALSSF is priced at $3.69, while MARZF trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALSSF currently has a P/E ratio of -184.50, whereas MARZF's P/E ratio is 5.38. In terms of profitability, ALSSF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MARZF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ALSSF and MARZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MARZF's competition here
ALSSF vs MRTPY Comparison February 2026
ALSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALSSF stands at 3B. In comparison, MRTPY has a market cap of 506.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ALSSF is priced at $3.69, while MRTPY trades at $8.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALSSF currently has a P/E ratio of -184.50, whereas MRTPY's P/E ratio is 5.33. In terms of profitability, ALSSF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MRTPY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ALSSF and MRTPY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MRTPY's competition here
ALSSF vs CFCGF Comparison February 2026
ALSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALSSF stands at 3B. In comparison, CFCGF has a market cap of 502.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ALSSF is priced at $3.69, while CFCGF trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALSSF currently has a P/E ratio of -184.50, whereas CFCGF's P/E ratio is 87.62. In terms of profitability, ALSSF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CFCGF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ALSSF is less volatile compared to CFCGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALSSF.Check CFCGF's competition here
ALSSF vs MLYSF Comparison February 2026
ALSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALSSF stands at 3B. In comparison, MLYSF has a market cap of 399M. Regarding current trading prices, ALSSF is priced at $3.69, while MLYSF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALSSF currently has a P/E ratio of -184.50, whereas MLYSF's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, ALSSF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MLYSF's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, ALSSF and MLYSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MLYSF's competition here
ALSSF vs RTBRF Comparison February 2026
ALSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALSSF stands at 3B. In comparison, RTBRF has a market cap of 351.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ALSSF is priced at $3.69, while RTBRF trades at $2.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALSSF currently has a P/E ratio of -184.50, whereas RTBRF's P/E ratio is 23.50. In terms of profitability, ALSSF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to RTBRF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ALSSF and RTBRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RTBRF's competition here
ALSSF vs FMBRY Comparison February 2026
ALSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALSSF stands at 3B. In comparison, FMBRY has a market cap of 330.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ALSSF is priced at $3.69, while FMBRY trades at $6.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALSSF currently has a P/E ratio of -184.50, whereas FMBRY's P/E ratio is 9.30. In terms of profitability, ALSSF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to FMBRY's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, ALSSF and FMBRY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FMBRY's competition here
ALSSF vs PZRIF Comparison February 2026
ALSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALSSF stands at 3B. In comparison, PZRIF has a market cap of 294.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ALSSF is priced at $3.69, while PZRIF trades at $11.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALSSF currently has a P/E ratio of -184.50, whereas PZRIF's P/E ratio is 17.35. In terms of profitability, ALSSF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PZRIF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ALSSF and PZRIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PZRIF's competition here
ALSSF vs CRNGF Comparison February 2026
ALSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALSSF stands at 3B. In comparison, CRNGF has a market cap of 172.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ALSSF is priced at $3.69, while CRNGF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALSSF currently has a P/E ratio of -184.50, whereas CRNGF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALSSF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CRNGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ALSSF and CRNGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CRNGF's competition here
ALSSF vs DLII Comparison February 2026
ALSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALSSF stands at 3B. In comparison, DLII has a market cap of 168.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ALSSF is priced at $3.69, while DLII trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALSSF currently has a P/E ratio of -184.50, whereas DLII's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALSSF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to DLII's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ALSSF is less volatile compared to DLII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALSSF.Check DLII's competition here
ALSSF vs XIAXF Comparison February 2026
ALSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALSSF stands at 3B. In comparison, XIAXF has a market cap of 144.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ALSSF is priced at $3.69, while XIAXF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALSSF currently has a P/E ratio of -184.50, whereas XIAXF's P/E ratio is -4.59. In terms of profitability, ALSSF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to XIAXF's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, ALSSF and XIAXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check XIAXF's competition here
ALSSF vs RFGPF Comparison February 2026
ALSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALSSF stands at 3B. In comparison, RFGPF has a market cap of 101M. Regarding current trading prices, ALSSF is priced at $3.69, while RFGPF trades at $1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALSSF currently has a P/E ratio of -184.50, whereas RFGPF's P/E ratio is 26.67. In terms of profitability, ALSSF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to RFGPF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ALSSF and RFGPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RFGPF's competition here
ALSSF vs FRWDF Comparison February 2026
ALSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALSSF stands at 3B. In comparison, FRWDF has a market cap of 82.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ALSSF is priced at $3.69, while FRWDF trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALSSF currently has a P/E ratio of -184.50, whereas FRWDF's P/E ratio is 21.27. In terms of profitability, ALSSF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to FRWDF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ALSSF and FRWDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FRWDF's competition here
ALSSF vs FRHHF Comparison February 2026
ALSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALSSF stands at 3B. In comparison, FRHHF has a market cap of 50.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ALSSF is priced at $3.69, while FRHHF trades at $1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALSSF currently has a P/E ratio of -184.50, whereas FRHHF's P/E ratio is -6.08. In terms of profitability, ALSSF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to FRHHF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ALSSF and FRHHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FRHHF's competition here
ALSSF vs TNGPF Comparison February 2026
ALSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALSSF stands at 3B. In comparison, TNGPF has a market cap of 47.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ALSSF is priced at $3.69, while TNGPF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALSSF currently has a P/E ratio of -184.50, whereas TNGPF's P/E ratio is 4.10. In terms of profitability, ALSSF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to TNGPF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ALSSF is less volatile compared to TNGPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALSSF.Check TNGPF's competition here
ALSSF vs MHGUP Comparison February 2026
ALSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALSSF stands at 3B. In comparison, MHGUP has a market cap of 33.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ALSSF is priced at $3.69, while MHGUP trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALSSF currently has a P/E ratio of -184.50, whereas MHGUP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALSSF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MHGUP's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ALSSF and MHGUP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MHGUP's competition here
ALSSF vs FBGI Comparison February 2026
ALSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALSSF stands at 3B. In comparison, FBGI has a market cap of 30.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ALSSF is priced at $3.69, while FBGI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALSSF currently has a P/E ratio of -184.50, whereas FBGI's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, ALSSF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to FBGI's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, ALSSF is less volatile compared to FBGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALSSF.Check FBGI's competition here
ALSSF vs GLLDF Comparison February 2026
ALSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALSSF stands at 3B. In comparison, GLLDF has a market cap of 27.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ALSSF is priced at $3.69, while GLLDF trades at $2.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALSSF currently has a P/E ratio of -184.50, whereas GLLDF's P/E ratio is 7.51. In terms of profitability, ALSSF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GLLDF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ALSSF and GLLDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GLLDF's competition here
ALSSF vs MHGU Comparison February 2026
ALSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALSSF stands at 3B. In comparison, MHGU has a market cap of 21.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ALSSF is priced at $3.69, while MHGU trades at $3.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALSSF currently has a P/E ratio of -184.50, whereas MHGU's P/E ratio is -2.01. In terms of profitability, ALSSF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MHGU's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ALSSF and MHGU have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MHGU's competition here
ALSSF vs MORRF Comparison February 2026
ALSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALSSF stands at 3B. In comparison, MORRF has a market cap of 20.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ALSSF is priced at $3.69, while MORRF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALSSF currently has a P/E ratio of -184.50, whereas MORRF's P/E ratio is -2.33. In terms of profitability, ALSSF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MORRF's ROE of -2.51%. Regarding short-term risk, ALSSF and MORRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MORRF's competition here
ALSSF vs GTEH Comparison February 2026
ALSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALSSF stands at 3B. In comparison, GTEH has a market cap of 18.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ALSSF is priced at $3.69, while GTEH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALSSF currently has a P/E ratio of -184.50, whereas GTEH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALSSF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GTEH's ROE of -2.69%. Regarding short-term risk, ALSSF and GTEH have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GTEH's competition here
ALSSF vs SCUPF Comparison February 2026
ALSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALSSF stands at 3B. In comparison, SCUPF has a market cap of 17.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ALSSF is priced at $3.69, while SCUPF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALSSF currently has a P/E ratio of -184.50, whereas SCUPF's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, ALSSF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SCUPF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ALSSF and SCUPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SCUPF's competition here
ALSSF vs FCCI Comparison February 2026
ALSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALSSF stands at 3B. In comparison, FCCI has a market cap of 10.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ALSSF is priced at $3.69, while FCCI trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALSSF currently has a P/E ratio of -184.50, whereas FCCI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALSSF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to FCCI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ALSSF and FCCI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FCCI's competition here
ALSSF vs NROM Comparison February 2026
ALSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALSSF stands at 3B. In comparison, NROM has a market cap of 8.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ALSSF is priced at $3.69, while NROM trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALSSF currently has a P/E ratio of -184.50, whereas NROM's P/E ratio is 12.33. In terms of profitability, ALSSF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to NROM's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, ALSSF is less volatile compared to NROM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALSSF.Check NROM's competition here
ALSSF vs GMPR Comparison February 2026
ALSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALSSF stands at 3B. In comparison, GMPR has a market cap of 7.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ALSSF is priced at $3.69, while GMPR trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALSSF currently has a P/E ratio of -184.50, whereas GMPR's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ALSSF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GMPR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ALSSF is less volatile compared to GMPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALSSF.Check GMPR's competition here
ALSSF vs JKHCF Comparison February 2026
ALSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALSSF stands at 3B. In comparison, JKHCF has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ALSSF is priced at $3.69, while JKHCF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALSSF currently has a P/E ratio of -184.50, whereas JKHCF's P/E ratio is -0.49. In terms of profitability, ALSSF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to JKHCF's ROE of -1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ALSSF is less volatile compared to JKHCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALSSF.Check JKHCF's competition here
ALSSF vs FATAQ Comparison February 2026
ALSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALSSF stands at 3B. In comparison, FATAQ has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ALSSF is priced at $3.69, while FATAQ trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALSSF currently has a P/E ratio of -184.50, whereas FATAQ's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, ALSSF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to FATAQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ALSSF is less volatile compared to FATAQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALSSF.Check FATAQ's competition here
ALSSF vs ODDAF Comparison February 2026
ALSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALSSF stands at 3B. In comparison, ODDAF has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ALSSF is priced at $3.69, while ODDAF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALSSF currently has a P/E ratio of -184.50, whereas ODDAF's P/E ratio is -3.32. In terms of profitability, ALSSF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ODDAF's ROE of +0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, ALSSF and ODDAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ODDAF's competition here
ALSSF vs GGLT Comparison February 2026
ALSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALSSF stands at 3B. In comparison, GGLT has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ALSSF is priced at $3.69, while GGLT trades at $200.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALSSF currently has a P/E ratio of -184.50, whereas GGLT's P/E ratio is 1.33. In terms of profitability, ALSSF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GGLT's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ALSSF and GGLT have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GGLT's competition here
ALSSF vs BDVB Comparison February 2026
ALSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALSSF stands at 3B. In comparison, BDVB has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ALSSF is priced at $3.69, while BDVB trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALSSF currently has a P/E ratio of -184.50, whereas BDVB's P/E ratio is -0.78. In terms of profitability, ALSSF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BDVB's ROE of -1.72%. Regarding short-term risk, ALSSF and BDVB have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BDVB's competition here
ALSSF vs KITL Comparison February 2026
ALSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALSSF stands at 3B. In comparison, KITL has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, ALSSF is priced at $3.69, while KITL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALSSF currently has a P/E ratio of -184.50, whereas KITL's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, ALSSF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to KITL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ALSSF is less volatile compared to KITL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALSSF.Check KITL's competition here
ALSSF vs ZAAG Comparison February 2026
ALSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALSSF stands at 3B. In comparison, ZAAG has a market cap of 952.8K. Regarding current trading prices, ALSSF is priced at $3.69, while ZAAG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALSSF currently has a P/E ratio of -184.50, whereas ZAAG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALSSF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ZAAG's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ALSSF and ZAAG have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ZAAG's competition here
ALSSF vs GAMN Comparison February 2026
ALSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALSSF stands at 3B. In comparison, GAMN has a market cap of 419.7K. Regarding current trading prices, ALSSF is priced at $3.69, while GAMN trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALSSF currently has a P/E ratio of -184.50, whereas GAMN's P/E ratio is -0.79. In terms of profitability, ALSSF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GAMN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ALSSF and GAMN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GAMN's competition here
ALSSF vs BLUU Comparison February 2026
ALSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALSSF stands at 3B. In comparison, BLUU has a market cap of 37.3K. Regarding current trading prices, ALSSF is priced at $3.69, while BLUU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALSSF currently has a P/E ratio of -184.50, whereas BLUU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALSSF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BLUU's ROE of +3.93%. Regarding short-term risk, ALSSF and BLUU have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BLUU's competition here
ALSSF vs GASMF Comparison February 2026
ALSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALSSF stands at 3B. In comparison, GASMF has a market cap of 29.8K. Regarding current trading prices, ALSSF is priced at $3.69, while GASMF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALSSF currently has a P/E ratio of -184.50, whereas GASMF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ALSSF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GASMF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ALSSF and GASMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GASMF's competition here
ALSSF vs PFSF Comparison February 2026
ALSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALSSF stands at 3B. In comparison, PFSF has a market cap of 28.9K. Regarding current trading prices, ALSSF is priced at $3.69, while PFSF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALSSF currently has a P/E ratio of -184.50, whereas PFSF's P/E ratio is -4.50. In terms of profitability, ALSSF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PFSF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ALSSF and PFSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PFSF's competition here
ALSSF vs RIBS Comparison February 2026
ALSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALSSF stands at 3B. In comparison, RIBS has a market cap of 19.5K. Regarding current trading prices, ALSSF is priced at $3.69, while RIBS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALSSF currently has a P/E ratio of -184.50, whereas RIBS's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, ALSSF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to RIBS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ALSSF is less volatile compared to RIBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALSSF.Check RIBS's competition here
ALSSF vs BBUCQ Comparison February 2026
ALSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALSSF stands at 3B. In comparison, BBUCQ has a market cap of 17.2K. Regarding current trading prices, ALSSF is priced at $3.69, while BBUCQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALSSF currently has a P/E ratio of -184.50, whereas BBUCQ's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ALSSF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BBUCQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ALSSF and BBUCQ have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BBUCQ's competition here
ALSSF vs COFE Comparison February 2026
ALSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALSSF stands at 3B. In comparison, COFE has a market cap of 16K. Regarding current trading prices, ALSSF is priced at $3.69, while COFE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALSSF currently has a P/E ratio of -184.50, whereas COFE's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ALSSF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to COFE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ALSSF and COFE have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check COFE's competition here
ALSSF vs SWRL Comparison February 2026
ALSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALSSF stands at 3B. In comparison, SWRL has a market cap of 6.6K. Regarding current trading prices, ALSSF is priced at $3.69, while SWRL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALSSF currently has a P/E ratio of -184.50, whereas SWRL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALSSF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SWRL's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ALSSF and SWRL have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SWRL's competition here
ALSSF vs CORG Comparison February 2026
ALSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALSSF stands at 3B. In comparison, CORG has a market cap of 2.7K. Regarding current trading prices, ALSSF is priced at $3.69, while CORG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALSSF currently has a P/E ratio of -184.50, whereas CORG's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ALSSF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CORG's ROE of +3.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ALSSF is less volatile compared to CORG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALSSF.Check CORG's competition here
ALSSF vs AMHG Comparison February 2026
ALSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALSSF stands at 3B. In comparison, AMHG has a market cap of 1.7K. Regarding current trading prices, ALSSF is priced at $3.69, while AMHG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALSSF currently has a P/E ratio of -184.50, whereas AMHG's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ALSSF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to AMHG's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, ALSSF and AMHG have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AMHG's competition here
ALSSF vs SCFFF Comparison February 2026
ALSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALSSF stands at 3B. In comparison, SCFFF has a market cap of 1.6K. Regarding current trading prices, ALSSF is priced at $3.69, while SCFFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALSSF currently has a P/E ratio of -184.50, whereas SCFFF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALSSF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SCFFF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ALSSF and SCFFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SCFFF's competition here
ALSSF vs GCFB Comparison February 2026
ALSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALSSF stands at 3B. In comparison, GCFB has a market cap of 1.4K. Regarding current trading prices, ALSSF is priced at $3.69, while GCFB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALSSF currently has a P/E ratio of -184.50, whereas GCFB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALSSF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GCFB's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, ALSSF and GCFB have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GCFB's competition here
ALSSF vs HTRE Comparison February 2026
ALSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALSSF stands at 3B. In comparison, HTRE has a market cap of 171. Regarding current trading prices, ALSSF is priced at $3.69, while HTRE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALSSF currently has a P/E ratio of -184.50, whereas HTRE's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ALSSF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to HTRE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ALSSF and HTRE have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HTRE's competition here
ALSSF vs ULFS Comparison February 2026
ALSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALSSF stands at 3B. In comparison, ULFS has a market cap of 70. Regarding current trading prices, ALSSF is priced at $3.69, while ULFS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALSSF currently has a P/E ratio of -184.50, whereas ULFS's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ALSSF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ULFS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ALSSF and ULFS have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ULFS's competition here
ALSSF vs PNSTQ Comparison February 2026
ALSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALSSF stands at 3B. In comparison, PNSTQ has a market cap of 41. Regarding current trading prices, ALSSF is priced at $3.69, while PNSTQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALSSF currently has a P/E ratio of -184.50, whereas PNSTQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALSSF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PNSTQ's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ALSSF is less volatile compared to PNSTQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALSSF.Check PNSTQ's competition here
ALSSF vs RKLC Comparison February 2026
ALSSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALSSF stands at 3B. In comparison, RKLC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ALSSF is priced at $3.69, while RKLC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALSSF currently has a P/E ratio of -184.50, whereas RKLC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALSSF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to RKLC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ALSSF and RKLC have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RKLC's competition here