Allfunds Group plc
Allfunds Group plc (ALLFG.AS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (ALLFG.AS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ALLFG.AS | €8.40 | +0.24% | 5.1B | -32.35 | -€0.26 | +1.56% |
| CSPX.AS | €627.07 | +0.80% | 114.3B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| IWDA.AS | €112.44 | +0.89% | 111.3B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| VUSA.AS | €110.87 | +0.74% | 69.1B | N/A | N/A | +0.97% |
| VWRL.AS | €144.22 | +0.87% | 49B | N/A | N/A | +1.39% |
| SP5H.PA | €328.10 | +0.74% | 24.3B | 27.41 | €12.07 | +1.00% |
| SP5C.PA | €423.08 | +0.85% | 24B | 28.01 | €15.14 | N/A |
| IUSA.AS | €58.30 | +0.82% | 17.5B | N/A | N/A | +0.95% |
| ISFA.AS | €11.70 | +0.97% | 17B | N/A | N/A | +2.88% |
| CSH2.PA | €108.58 | +0.02% | 16B | 28.25 | €3.84 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
ALLFG.AS vs CSPX.AS Comparison March 2026
ALLFG.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLFG.AS stands at 5.1B. In comparison, CSPX.AS has a market cap of 114.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ALLFG.AS is priced at €8.40, while CSPX.AS trades at €627.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLFG.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -32.35, whereas CSPX.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALLFG.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CSPX.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLFG.AS is more volatile compared to CSPX.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLFG.AS.Check CSPX.AS's competition here
ALLFG.AS vs IWDA.AS Comparison March 2026
ALLFG.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLFG.AS stands at 5.1B. In comparison, IWDA.AS has a market cap of 111.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ALLFG.AS is priced at €8.40, while IWDA.AS trades at €112.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLFG.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -32.35, whereas IWDA.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALLFG.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IWDA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLFG.AS is more volatile compared to IWDA.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLFG.AS.Check IWDA.AS's competition here
ALLFG.AS vs VUSA.AS Comparison March 2026
ALLFG.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLFG.AS stands at 5.1B. In comparison, VUSA.AS has a market cap of 69.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ALLFG.AS is priced at €8.40, while VUSA.AS trades at €110.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLFG.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -32.35, whereas VUSA.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALLFG.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VUSA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLFG.AS is more volatile compared to VUSA.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLFG.AS.Check VUSA.AS's competition here
ALLFG.AS vs VWRL.AS Comparison March 2026
ALLFG.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLFG.AS stands at 5.1B. In comparison, VWRL.AS has a market cap of 49B. Regarding current trading prices, ALLFG.AS is priced at €8.40, while VWRL.AS trades at €144.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLFG.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -32.35, whereas VWRL.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALLFG.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VWRL.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLFG.AS is more volatile compared to VWRL.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLFG.AS.Check VWRL.AS's competition here
ALLFG.AS vs SP5H.PA Comparison March 2026
ALLFG.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLFG.AS stands at 5.1B. In comparison, SP5H.PA has a market cap of 24.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ALLFG.AS is priced at €8.40, while SP5H.PA trades at €328.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLFG.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -32.35, whereas SP5H.PA's P/E ratio is 27.41. In terms of profitability, ALLFG.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SP5H.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLFG.AS is more volatile compared to SP5H.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLFG.AS.Check SP5H.PA's competition here
ALLFG.AS vs SP5C.PA Comparison March 2026
ALLFG.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLFG.AS stands at 5.1B. In comparison, SP5C.PA has a market cap of 24B. Regarding current trading prices, ALLFG.AS is priced at €8.40, while SP5C.PA trades at €423.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLFG.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -32.35, whereas SP5C.PA's P/E ratio is 28.01. In terms of profitability, ALLFG.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SP5C.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLFG.AS is more volatile compared to SP5C.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLFG.AS.Check SP5C.PA's competition here
ALLFG.AS vs IUSA.AS Comparison March 2026
ALLFG.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLFG.AS stands at 5.1B. In comparison, IUSA.AS has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ALLFG.AS is priced at €8.40, while IUSA.AS trades at €58.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLFG.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -32.35, whereas IUSA.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALLFG.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IUSA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLFG.AS is more volatile compared to IUSA.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLFG.AS.Check IUSA.AS's competition here
ALLFG.AS vs ISFA.AS Comparison March 2026
ALLFG.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLFG.AS stands at 5.1B. In comparison, ISFA.AS has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, ALLFG.AS is priced at €8.40, while ISFA.AS trades at €11.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLFG.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -32.35, whereas ISFA.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALLFG.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ISFA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLFG.AS is more volatile compared to ISFA.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLFG.AS.Check ISFA.AS's competition here
ALLFG.AS vs CSH2.PA Comparison March 2026
ALLFG.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLFG.AS stands at 5.1B. In comparison, CSH2.PA has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, ALLFG.AS is priced at €8.40, while CSH2.PA trades at €108.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLFG.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -32.35, whereas CSH2.PA's P/E ratio is 28.25. In terms of profitability, ALLFG.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CSH2.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLFG.AS is more volatile compared to CSH2.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLFG.AS.Check CSH2.PA's competition here
ALLFG.AS vs HAL.AS Comparison March 2026
ALLFG.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLFG.AS stands at 5.1B. In comparison, HAL.AS has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ALLFG.AS is priced at €8.40, while HAL.AS trades at €172.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLFG.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -32.35, whereas HAL.AS's P/E ratio is 9.08. In terms of profitability, ALLFG.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HAL.AS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLFG.AS is more volatile compared to HAL.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLFG.AS.Check HAL.AS's competition here
ALLFG.AS vs AMUN.PA Comparison March 2026
ALLFG.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLFG.AS stands at 5.1B. In comparison, AMUN.PA has a market cap of 15.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ALLFG.AS is priced at €8.40, while AMUN.PA trades at €75.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLFG.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -32.35, whereas AMUN.PA's P/E ratio is 9.32. In terms of profitability, ALLFG.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AMUN.PA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLFG.AS is more volatile compared to AMUN.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLFG.AS.Check AMUN.PA's competition here
ALLFG.AS vs MEUD.PA Comparison March 2026
ALLFG.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLFG.AS stands at 5.1B. In comparison, MEUD.PA has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ALLFG.AS is priced at €8.40, while MEUD.PA trades at €290.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLFG.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -32.35, whereas MEUD.PA's P/E ratio is 18.51. In terms of profitability, ALLFG.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MEUD.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLFG.AS is more volatile compared to MEUD.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLFG.AS.Check MEUD.PA's competition here
ALLFG.AS vs I500.AS Comparison March 2026
ALLFG.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLFG.AS stands at 5.1B. In comparison, I500.AS has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ALLFG.AS is priced at €8.40, while I500.AS trades at €11.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLFG.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -32.35, whereas I500.AS's P/E ratio is 27.46. In terms of profitability, ALLFG.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to I500.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLFG.AS is more volatile compared to I500.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLFG.AS.Check I500.AS's competition here
ALLFG.AS vs I50D.AS Comparison March 2026
ALLFG.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLFG.AS stands at 5.1B. In comparison, I50D.AS has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ALLFG.AS is priced at €8.40, while I50D.AS trades at €7.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLFG.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -32.35, whereas I50D.AS's P/E ratio is 27.43. In terms of profitability, ALLFG.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to I50D.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLFG.AS is more volatile compared to I50D.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLFG.AS.Check I50D.AS's competition here
ALLFG.AS vs GOLD.PA Comparison March 2026
ALLFG.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLFG.AS stands at 5.1B. In comparison, GOLD.PA has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ALLFG.AS is priced at €8.40, while GOLD.PA trades at €177.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLFG.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -32.35, whereas GOLD.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALLFG.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GOLD.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLFG.AS is more volatile compared to GOLD.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLFG.AS.Check GOLD.PA's competition here
ALLFG.AS vs IMEU.AS Comparison March 2026
ALLFG.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLFG.AS stands at 5.1B. In comparison, IMEU.AS has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ALLFG.AS is priced at €8.40, while IMEU.AS trades at €37.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLFG.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -32.35, whereas IMEU.AS's P/E ratio is 19.18. In terms of profitability, ALLFG.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IMEU.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLFG.AS is more volatile compared to IMEU.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLFG.AS.Check IMEU.AS's competition here
ALLFG.AS vs VHYL.AS Comparison March 2026
ALLFG.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLFG.AS stands at 5.1B. In comparison, VHYL.AS has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ALLFG.AS is priced at €8.40, while VHYL.AS trades at €74.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLFG.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -32.35, whereas VHYL.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALLFG.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VHYL.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLFG.AS is more volatile compared to VHYL.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLFG.AS.Check VHYL.AS's competition here
ALLFG.AS vs GBLB.BR Comparison March 2026
ALLFG.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLFG.AS stands at 5.1B. In comparison, GBLB.BR has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ALLFG.AS is priced at €8.40, while GBLB.BR trades at €79.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLFG.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -32.35, whereas GBLB.BR's P/E ratio is 80.05. In terms of profitability, ALLFG.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GBLB.BR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLFG.AS is less volatile compared to GBLB.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLFG.AS.Check GBLB.BR's competition here
ALLFG.AS vs WLDHC.PA Comparison March 2026
ALLFG.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLFG.AS stands at 5.1B. In comparison, WLDHC.PA has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ALLFG.AS is priced at €8.40, while WLDHC.PA trades at €15.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLFG.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -32.35, whereas WLDHC.PA's P/E ratio is 24.45. In terms of profitability, ALLFG.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WLDHC.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLFG.AS is more volatile compared to WLDHC.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLFG.AS.Check WLDHC.PA's competition here
ALLFG.AS vs WLDH.PA Comparison March 2026
ALLFG.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLFG.AS stands at 5.1B. In comparison, WLDH.PA has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ALLFG.AS is priced at €8.40, while WLDH.PA trades at €238.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLFG.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -32.35, whereas WLDH.PA's P/E ratio is 24.43. In terms of profitability, ALLFG.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WLDH.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLFG.AS is more volatile compared to WLDH.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLFG.AS.Check WLDH.PA's competition here
ALLFG.AS vs WLD.PA Comparison March 2026
ALLFG.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLFG.AS stands at 5.1B. In comparison, WLD.PA has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ALLFG.AS is priced at €8.40, while WLD.PA trades at €378.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLFG.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -32.35, whereas WLD.PA's P/E ratio is 24.85. In terms of profitability, ALLFG.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WLD.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLFG.AS is more volatile compared to WLD.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLFG.AS.Check WLD.PA's competition here
ALLFG.AS vs PSH.AS Comparison March 2026
ALLFG.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLFG.AS stands at 5.1B. In comparison, PSH.AS has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ALLFG.AS is priced at €8.40, while PSH.AS trades at €51.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLFG.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -32.35, whereas PSH.AS's P/E ratio is 4.41. In terms of profitability, ALLFG.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PSH.AS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLFG.AS is less volatile compared to PSH.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLFG.AS.Check PSH.AS's competition here
ALLFG.AS vs CBUG.AS Comparison March 2026
ALLFG.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLFG.AS stands at 5.1B. In comparison, CBUG.AS has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ALLFG.AS is priced at €8.40, while CBUG.AS trades at €4.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLFG.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -32.35, whereas CBUG.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALLFG.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CBUG.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLFG.AS is more volatile compared to CBUG.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLFG.AS.Check CBUG.AS's competition here
ALLFG.AS vs CEUU.AS Comparison March 2026
ALLFG.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLFG.AS stands at 5.1B. In comparison, CEUU.AS has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ALLFG.AS is priced at €8.40, while CEUU.AS trades at €11.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLFG.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -32.35, whereas CEUU.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALLFG.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CEUU.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLFG.AS is more volatile compared to CEUU.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLFG.AS.Check CEUU.AS's competition here
ALLFG.AS vs SOF.BR Comparison March 2026
ALLFG.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLFG.AS stands at 5.1B. In comparison, SOF.BR has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ALLFG.AS is priced at €8.40, while SOF.BR trades at €224.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLFG.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -32.35, whereas SOF.BR's P/E ratio is 20.00. In terms of profitability, ALLFG.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SOF.BR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLFG.AS is less volatile compared to SOF.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLFG.AS.Check SOF.BR's competition here
ALLFG.AS vs PHAU.AS Comparison March 2026
ALLFG.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLFG.AS stands at 5.1B. In comparison, PHAU.AS has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ALLFG.AS is priced at €8.40, while PHAU.AS trades at €415.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLFG.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -32.35, whereas PHAU.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALLFG.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PHAU.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLFG.AS is more volatile compared to PHAU.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLFG.AS.Check PHAU.AS's competition here
ALLFG.AS vs AEME.PA Comparison March 2026
ALLFG.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLFG.AS stands at 5.1B. In comparison, AEME.PA has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ALLFG.AS is priced at €8.40, while AEME.PA trades at €87.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLFG.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -32.35, whereas AEME.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALLFG.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AEME.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLFG.AS is more volatile compared to AEME.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLFG.AS.Check AEME.PA's competition here
ALLFG.AS vs SJPD.AS Comparison March 2026
ALLFG.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLFG.AS stands at 5.1B. In comparison, SJPD.AS has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ALLFG.AS is priced at €8.40, while SJPD.AS trades at €7.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLFG.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -32.35, whereas SJPD.AS's P/E ratio is 17.82. In terms of profitability, ALLFG.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SJPD.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLFG.AS is more volatile compared to SJPD.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLFG.AS.Check SJPD.AS's competition here
ALLFG.AS vs IWRD.AS Comparison March 2026
ALLFG.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLFG.AS stands at 5.1B. In comparison, IWRD.AS has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ALLFG.AS is priced at €8.40, while IWRD.AS trades at €81.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLFG.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -32.35, whereas IWRD.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALLFG.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IWRD.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLFG.AS is more volatile compared to IWRD.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLFG.AS.Check IWRD.AS's competition here
ALLFG.AS vs IEMM.AS Comparison March 2026
ALLFG.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLFG.AS stands at 5.1B. In comparison, IEMM.AS has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ALLFG.AS is priced at €8.40, while IEMM.AS trades at €50.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLFG.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -32.35, whereas IEMM.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALLFG.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IEMM.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLFG.AS is more volatile compared to IEMM.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLFG.AS.Check IEMM.AS's competition here
ALLFG.AS vs LCWD.PA Comparison March 2026
ALLFG.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLFG.AS stands at 5.1B. In comparison, LCWD.PA has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, ALLFG.AS is priced at €8.40, while LCWD.PA trades at €19.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLFG.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -32.35, whereas LCWD.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALLFG.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LCWD.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLFG.AS is more volatile compared to LCWD.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLFG.AS.Check LCWD.PA's competition here
ALLFG.AS vs SJPE.AS Comparison March 2026
ALLFG.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLFG.AS stands at 5.1B. In comparison, SJPE.AS has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, ALLFG.AS is priced at €8.40, while SJPE.AS trades at €13.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLFG.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -32.35, whereas SJPE.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALLFG.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SJPE.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLFG.AS is more volatile compared to SJPE.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLFG.AS.Check SJPE.AS's competition here
ALLFG.AS vs IJPA.AS Comparison March 2026
ALLFG.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLFG.AS stands at 5.1B. In comparison, IJPA.AS has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ALLFG.AS is priced at €8.40, while IJPA.AS trades at €63.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLFG.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -32.35, whereas IJPA.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALLFG.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IJPA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLFG.AS is more volatile compared to IJPA.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLFG.AS.Check IJPA.AS's competition here
ALLFG.AS vs VEUR.AS Comparison March 2026
ALLFG.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLFG.AS stands at 5.1B. In comparison, VEUR.AS has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ALLFG.AS is priced at €8.40, while VEUR.AS trades at €46.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLFG.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -32.35, whereas VEUR.AS's P/E ratio is 18.91. In terms of profitability, ALLFG.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VEUR.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLFG.AS is more volatile compared to VEUR.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLFG.AS.Check VEUR.AS's competition here
ALLFG.AS vs IEMA.AS Comparison March 2026
ALLFG.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLFG.AS stands at 5.1B. In comparison, IEMA.AS has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ALLFG.AS is priced at €8.40, while IEMA.AS trades at €48.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLFG.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -32.35, whereas IEMA.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALLFG.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IEMA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLFG.AS is more volatile compared to IEMA.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLFG.AS.Check IEMA.AS's competition here
ALLFG.AS vs CC4.PA Comparison March 2026
ALLFG.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLFG.AS stands at 5.1B. In comparison, CC4.PA has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ALLFG.AS is priced at €8.40, while CC4.PA trades at €227.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLFG.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -32.35, whereas CC4.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALLFG.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CC4.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLFG.AS is more volatile compared to CC4.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLFG.AS.Check CC4.PA's competition here
ALLFG.AS vs ECRP.PA Comparison March 2026
ALLFG.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLFG.AS stands at 5.1B. In comparison, ECRP.PA has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ALLFG.AS is priced at €8.40, while ECRP.PA trades at €53.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLFG.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -32.35, whereas ECRP.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALLFG.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ECRP.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLFG.AS is more volatile compared to ECRP.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLFG.AS.Check ECRP.PA's competition here
ALLFG.AS vs CW8.PA Comparison March 2026
ALLFG.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLFG.AS stands at 5.1B. In comparison, CW8.PA has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, ALLFG.AS is priced at €8.40, while CW8.PA trades at €612.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLFG.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -32.35, whereas CW8.PA's P/E ratio is 24.87. In terms of profitability, ALLFG.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CW8.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLFG.AS is more volatile compared to CW8.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLFG.AS.Check CW8.PA's competition here
ALLFG.AS vs EWLD.PA Comparison March 2026
ALLFG.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLFG.AS stands at 5.1B. In comparison, EWLD.PA has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ALLFG.AS is priced at €8.40, while EWLD.PA trades at €36.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLFG.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -32.35, whereas EWLD.PA's P/E ratio is 24.88. In terms of profitability, ALLFG.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EWLD.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLFG.AS is more volatile compared to EWLD.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLFG.AS.Check EWLD.PA's competition here
ALLFG.AS vs AUEM.PA Comparison March 2026
ALLFG.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLFG.AS stands at 5.1B. In comparison, AUEM.PA has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ALLFG.AS is priced at €8.40, while AUEM.PA trades at €7.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLFG.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -32.35, whereas AUEM.PA's P/E ratio is 17.54. In terms of profitability, ALLFG.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AUEM.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLFG.AS is more volatile compared to AUEM.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLFG.AS.Check AUEM.PA's competition here
ALLFG.AS vs 500.PA Comparison March 2026
ALLFG.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLFG.AS stands at 5.1B. In comparison, 500.PA has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ALLFG.AS is priced at €8.40, while 500.PA trades at €116.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLFG.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -32.35, whereas 500.PA's P/E ratio is 27.99. In terms of profitability, ALLFG.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 500.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLFG.AS is more volatile compared to 500.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLFG.AS.Check 500.PA's competition here
ALLFG.AS vs KBCA.BR Comparison March 2026
ALLFG.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLFG.AS stands at 5.1B. In comparison, KBCA.BR has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ALLFG.AS is priced at €8.40, while KBCA.BR trades at €74.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLFG.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -32.35, whereas KBCA.BR's P/E ratio is 18.20. In terms of profitability, ALLFG.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KBCA.BR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLFG.AS is more volatile compared to KBCA.BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLFG.AS.Check KBCA.BR's competition here
ALLFG.AS vs TDIV.AS Comparison March 2026
ALLFG.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLFG.AS stands at 5.1B. In comparison, TDIV.AS has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ALLFG.AS is priced at €8.40, while TDIV.AS trades at €51.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLFG.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -32.35, whereas TDIV.AS's P/E ratio is 14.94. In terms of profitability, ALLFG.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TDIV.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLFG.AS is more volatile compared to TDIV.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLFG.AS.Check TDIV.AS's competition here
ALLFG.AS vs UST.PA Comparison March 2026
ALLFG.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLFG.AS stands at 5.1B. In comparison, UST.PA has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ALLFG.AS is priced at €8.40, while UST.PA trades at €87.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLFG.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -32.35, whereas UST.PA's P/E ratio is 33.36. In terms of profitability, ALLFG.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UST.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLFG.AS is more volatile compared to UST.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLFG.AS.Check UST.PA's competition here
ALLFG.AS vs EUEA.AS Comparison March 2026
ALLFG.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLFG.AS stands at 5.1B. In comparison, EUEA.AS has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ALLFG.AS is priced at €8.40, while EUEA.AS trades at €58.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLFG.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -32.35, whereas EUEA.AS's P/E ratio is 18.72. In terms of profitability, ALLFG.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EUEA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLFG.AS is more volatile compared to EUEA.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLFG.AS.Check EUEA.AS's competition here
ALLFG.AS vs REINA.AS Comparison March 2026
ALLFG.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLFG.AS stands at 5.1B. In comparison, REINA.AS has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ALLFG.AS is priced at €8.40, while REINA.AS trades at €28.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLFG.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -32.35, whereas REINA.AS's P/E ratio is 40.00. In terms of profitability, ALLFG.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to REINA.AS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLFG.AS is more volatile compared to REINA.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLFG.AS.Check REINA.AS's competition here
ALLFG.AS vs C50U.PA Comparison March 2026
ALLFG.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLFG.AS stands at 5.1B. In comparison, C50U.PA has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ALLFG.AS is priced at €8.40, while C50U.PA trades at €176.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLFG.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -32.35, whereas C50U.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALLFG.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to C50U.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLFG.AS is more volatile compared to C50U.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLFG.AS.Check C50U.PA's competition here
ALLFG.AS vs USA.PA Comparison March 2026
ALLFG.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLFG.AS stands at 5.1B. In comparison, USA.PA has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ALLFG.AS is priced at €8.40, while USA.PA trades at €533.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLFG.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -32.35, whereas USA.PA's P/E ratio is 27.78. In terms of profitability, ALLFG.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to USA.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLFG.AS is more volatile compared to USA.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLFG.AS.Check USA.PA's competition here
ALLFG.AS vs S500.PA Comparison March 2026
ALLFG.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLFG.AS stands at 5.1B. In comparison, S500.PA has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ALLFG.AS is priced at €8.40, while S500.PA trades at €170.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLFG.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -32.35, whereas S500.PA's P/E ratio is 28.30. In terms of profitability, ALLFG.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to S500.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLFG.AS is more volatile compared to S500.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLFG.AS.Check S500.PA's competition here
ALLFG.AS vs S500H.PA Comparison March 2026
ALLFG.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLFG.AS stands at 5.1B. In comparison, S500H.PA has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ALLFG.AS is priced at €8.40, while S500H.PA trades at €96.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLFG.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -32.35, whereas S500H.PA's P/E ratio is 27.66. In terms of profitability, ALLFG.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to S500H.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLFG.AS is more volatile compared to S500H.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLFG.AS.Check S500H.PA's competition here
ALLFG.AS vs USAC.PA Comparison March 2026
ALLFG.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLFG.AS stands at 5.1B. In comparison, USAC.PA has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ALLFG.AS is priced at €8.40, while USAC.PA trades at €584.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLFG.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -32.35, whereas USAC.PA's P/E ratio is 28.08. In terms of profitability, ALLFG.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to USAC.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLFG.AS is more volatile compared to USAC.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLFG.AS.Check USAC.PA's competition here
ALLFG.AS vs AEEM.PA Comparison March 2026
ALLFG.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLFG.AS stands at 5.1B. In comparison, AEEM.PA has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, ALLFG.AS is priced at €8.40, while AEEM.PA trades at €6.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLFG.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -32.35, whereas AEEM.PA's P/E ratio is 17.60. In terms of profitability, ALLFG.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AEEM.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLFG.AS is more volatile compared to AEEM.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLFG.AS.Check AEEM.PA's competition here
ALLFG.AS vs EXCH.AS Comparison March 2026
ALLFG.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLFG.AS stands at 5.1B. In comparison, EXCH.AS has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ALLFG.AS is priced at €8.40, while EXCH.AS trades at €7.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLFG.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -32.35, whereas EXCH.AS's P/E ratio is 19.27. In terms of profitability, ALLFG.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EXCH.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLFG.AS is more volatile compared to EXCH.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLFG.AS.Check EXCH.AS's competition here
ALLFG.AS vs ICHN.AS Comparison March 2026
ALLFG.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLFG.AS stands at 5.1B. In comparison, ICHN.AS has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ALLFG.AS is priced at €8.40, while ICHN.AS trades at €5.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLFG.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -32.35, whereas ICHN.AS's P/E ratio is 13.28. In terms of profitability, ALLFG.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ICHN.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLFG.AS is more volatile compared to ICHN.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLFG.AS.Check ICHN.AS's competition here
ALLFG.AS vs ICHD.AS Comparison March 2026
ALLFG.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLFG.AS stands at 5.1B. In comparison, ICHD.AS has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ALLFG.AS is priced at €8.40, while ICHD.AS trades at €5.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLFG.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -32.35, whereas ICHD.AS's P/E ratio is 13.26. In terms of profitability, ALLFG.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ICHD.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLFG.AS is more volatile compared to ICHD.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLFG.AS.Check ICHD.AS's competition here
ALLFG.AS vs C50.PA Comparison March 2026
ALLFG.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLFG.AS stands at 5.1B. In comparison, C50.PA has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ALLFG.AS is priced at €8.40, while C50.PA trades at €151.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLFG.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -32.35, whereas C50.PA's P/E ratio is 18.55. In terms of profitability, ALLFG.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to C50.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLFG.AS is more volatile compared to C50.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLFG.AS.Check C50.PA's competition here
ALLFG.AS vs VERX.AS Comparison March 2026
ALLFG.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLFG.AS stands at 5.1B. In comparison, VERX.AS has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ALLFG.AS is priced at €8.40, while VERX.AS trades at €46.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLFG.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -32.35, whereas VERX.AS's P/E ratio is 18.50. In terms of profitability, ALLFG.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VERX.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLFG.AS is more volatile compared to VERX.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLFG.AS.Check VERX.AS's competition here
ALLFG.AS vs CD5.PA Comparison March 2026
ALLFG.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLFG.AS stands at 5.1B. In comparison, CD5.PA has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ALLFG.AS is priced at €8.40, while CD5.PA trades at €91.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLFG.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -32.35, whereas CD5.PA's P/E ratio is 18.54. In terms of profitability, ALLFG.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CD5.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLFG.AS is more volatile compared to CD5.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLFG.AS.Check CD5.PA's competition here
ALLFG.AS vs SEMD.AS Comparison March 2026
ALLFG.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLFG.AS stands at 5.1B. In comparison, SEMD.AS has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ALLFG.AS is priced at €8.40, while SEMD.AS trades at €6.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLFG.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -32.35, whereas SEMD.AS's P/E ratio is 17.43. In terms of profitability, ALLFG.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SEMD.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLFG.AS is more volatile compared to SEMD.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLFG.AS.Check SEMD.AS's competition here
ALLFG.AS vs MSE.PA Comparison March 2026
ALLFG.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLFG.AS stands at 5.1B. In comparison, MSE.PA has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ALLFG.AS is priced at €8.40, while MSE.PA trades at €64.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLFG.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -32.35, whereas MSE.PA's P/E ratio is 18.07. In terms of profitability, ALLFG.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MSE.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLFG.AS is more volatile compared to MSE.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLFG.AS.Check MSE.PA's competition here
ALLFG.AS vs CACC.PA Comparison March 2026
ALLFG.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLFG.AS stands at 5.1B. In comparison, CACC.PA has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ALLFG.AS is priced at €8.40, while CACC.PA trades at €39.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLFG.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -32.35, whereas CACC.PA's P/E ratio is 18.75. In terms of profitability, ALLFG.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CACC.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLFG.AS is more volatile compared to CACC.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLFG.AS.Check CACC.PA's competition here
ALLFG.AS vs CAC.PA Comparison March 2026
ALLFG.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLFG.AS stands at 5.1B. In comparison, CAC.PA has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ALLFG.AS is priced at €8.40, while CAC.PA trades at €78.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLFG.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -32.35, whereas CAC.PA's P/E ratio is 18.74. In terms of profitability, ALLFG.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CAC.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLFG.AS is more volatile compared to CAC.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLFG.AS.Check CAC.PA's competition here
ALLFG.AS vs 500X.AS Comparison March 2026
ALLFG.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLFG.AS stands at 5.1B. In comparison, 500X.AS has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ALLFG.AS is priced at €8.40, while 500X.AS trades at €42.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLFG.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -32.35, whereas 500X.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALLFG.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 500X.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLFG.AS is more volatile compared to 500X.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLFG.AS.Check 500X.AS's competition here
ALLFG.AS vs WSRI.PA Comparison March 2026
ALLFG.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLFG.AS stands at 5.1B. In comparison, WSRI.PA has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, ALLFG.AS is priced at €8.40, while WSRI.PA trades at €103.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLFG.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -32.35, whereas WSRI.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALLFG.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WSRI.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLFG.AS is more volatile compared to WSRI.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLFG.AS.Check WSRI.PA's competition here
ALLFG.AS vs AGGD.AS Comparison March 2026
ALLFG.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLFG.AS stands at 5.1B. In comparison, AGGD.AS has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, ALLFG.AS is priced at €8.40, while AGGD.AS trades at €5.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLFG.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -32.35, whereas AGGD.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALLFG.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AGGD.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLFG.AS is more volatile compared to AGGD.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLFG.AS.Check AGGD.AS's competition here
ALLFG.AS vs SRIL.AS Comparison March 2026
ALLFG.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLFG.AS stands at 5.1B. In comparison, SRIL.AS has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ALLFG.AS is priced at €8.40, while SRIL.AS trades at €11.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLFG.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -32.35, whereas SRIL.AS's P/E ratio is 25.18. In terms of profitability, ALLFG.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SRIL.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLFG.AS is more volatile compared to SRIL.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLFG.AS.Check SRIL.AS's competition here
ALLFG.AS vs GLUH.AS Comparison March 2026
ALLFG.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLFG.AS stands at 5.1B. In comparison, GLUH.AS has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ALLFG.AS is priced at €8.40, while GLUH.AS trades at €4.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLFG.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -32.35, whereas GLUH.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALLFG.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GLUH.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLFG.AS is more volatile compared to GLUH.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLFG.AS.Check GLUH.AS's competition here
ALLFG.AS vs EHYA.AS Comparison March 2026
ALLFG.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLFG.AS stands at 5.1B. In comparison, EHYA.AS has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ALLFG.AS is priced at €8.40, while EHYA.AS trades at €5.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLFG.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -32.35, whereas EHYA.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALLFG.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EHYA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLFG.AS is more volatile compared to EHYA.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLFG.AS.Check EHYA.AS's competition here
ALLFG.AS vs EHYD.AS Comparison March 2026
ALLFG.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLFG.AS stands at 5.1B. In comparison, EHYD.AS has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ALLFG.AS is priced at €8.40, while EHYD.AS trades at €4.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLFG.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -32.35, whereas EHYD.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALLFG.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EHYD.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLFG.AS is more volatile compared to EHYD.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLFG.AS.Check EHYD.AS's competition here
ALLFG.AS vs ROLA.AS Comparison March 2026
ALLFG.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLFG.AS stands at 5.1B. In comparison, ROLA.AS has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ALLFG.AS is priced at €8.40, while ROLA.AS trades at €65.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLFG.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -32.35, whereas ROLA.AS's P/E ratio is 6.52. In terms of profitability, ALLFG.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ROLA.AS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ALLFG.AS is more volatile compared to ROLA.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLFG.AS.Check ROLA.AS's competition here
ALLFG.AS vs EEUE.PA Comparison March 2026
ALLFG.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLFG.AS stands at 5.1B. In comparison, EEUE.PA has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ALLFG.AS is priced at €8.40, while EEUE.PA trades at €18.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLFG.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -32.35, whereas EEUE.PA's P/E ratio is 19.19. In terms of profitability, ALLFG.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EEUE.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLFG.AS is more volatile compared to EEUE.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLFG.AS.Check EEUE.PA's competition here
ALLFG.AS vs WESE.PA Comparison March 2026
ALLFG.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLFG.AS stands at 5.1B. In comparison, WESE.PA has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ALLFG.AS is priced at €8.40, while WESE.PA trades at €76.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLFG.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -32.35, whereas WESE.PA's P/E ratio is 25.15. In terms of profitability, ALLFG.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WESE.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLFG.AS is more volatile compared to WESE.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLFG.AS.Check WESE.PA's competition here
ALLFG.AS vs MF.PA Comparison March 2026
ALLFG.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLFG.AS stands at 5.1B. In comparison, MF.PA has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ALLFG.AS is priced at €8.40, while MF.PA trades at €80.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLFG.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -32.35, whereas MF.PA's P/E ratio is -20.45. In terms of profitability, ALLFG.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MF.PA's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLFG.AS is less volatile compared to MF.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLFG.AS.Check MF.PA's competition here
ALLFG.AS vs PHAG.AS Comparison March 2026
ALLFG.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLFG.AS stands at 5.1B. In comparison, PHAG.AS has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ALLFG.AS is priced at €8.40, while PHAG.AS trades at €67.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLFG.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -32.35, whereas PHAG.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALLFG.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PHAG.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLFG.AS is less volatile compared to PHAG.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLFG.AS.Check PHAG.AS's competition here
ALLFG.AS vs GEMU.PA Comparison March 2026
ALLFG.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLFG.AS stands at 5.1B. In comparison, GEMU.PA has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ALLFG.AS is priced at €8.40, while GEMU.PA trades at €9.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLFG.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -32.35, whereas GEMU.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALLFG.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GEMU.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLFG.AS is more volatile compared to GEMU.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLFG.AS.Check GEMU.PA's competition here
ALLFG.AS vs IDSE.AS Comparison March 2026
ALLFG.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLFG.AS stands at 5.1B. In comparison, IDSE.AS has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ALLFG.AS is priced at €8.40, while IDSE.AS trades at €140.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLFG.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -32.35, whereas IDSE.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALLFG.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IDSE.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLFG.AS is more volatile compared to IDSE.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLFG.AS.Check IDSE.AS's competition here
ALLFG.AS vs ISED.AS Comparison March 2026
ALLFG.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLFG.AS stands at 5.1B. In comparison, ISED.AS has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ALLFG.AS is priced at €8.40, while ISED.AS trades at €7.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLFG.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -32.35, whereas ISED.AS's P/E ratio is 20.72. In terms of profitability, ALLFG.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ISED.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLFG.AS is more volatile compared to ISED.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLFG.AS.Check ISED.AS's competition here
ALLFG.AS vs BNKE.PA Comparison March 2026
ALLFG.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLFG.AS stands at 5.1B. In comparison, BNKE.PA has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ALLFG.AS is priced at €8.40, while BNKE.PA trades at €307.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLFG.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -32.35, whereas BNKE.PA's P/E ratio is 10.82. In terms of profitability, ALLFG.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BNKE.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLFG.AS is less volatile compared to BNKE.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLFG.AS.Check BNKE.PA's competition here
ALLFG.AS vs IMBE.AS Comparison March 2026
ALLFG.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLFG.AS stands at 5.1B. In comparison, IMBE.AS has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ALLFG.AS is priced at €8.40, while IMBE.AS trades at €4.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLFG.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -32.35, whereas IMBE.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALLFG.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IMBE.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLFG.AS is more volatile compared to IMBE.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLFG.AS.Check IMBE.AS's competition here
ALLFG.AS vs BREB.BR Comparison March 2026
ALLFG.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLFG.AS stands at 5.1B. In comparison, BREB.BR has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ALLFG.AS is priced at €8.40, while BREB.BR trades at €103.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLFG.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -32.35, whereas BREB.BR's P/E ratio is 61.05. In terms of profitability, ALLFG.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BREB.BR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLFG.AS is more volatile compared to BREB.BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLFG.AS.Check BREB.BR's competition here
ALLFG.AS vs CB3.PA Comparison March 2026
ALLFG.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLFG.AS stands at 5.1B. In comparison, CB3.PA has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, ALLFG.AS is priced at €8.40, while CB3.PA trades at €221.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLFG.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -32.35, whereas CB3.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALLFG.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CB3.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLFG.AS is more volatile compared to CB3.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLFG.AS.Check CB3.PA's competition here
ALLFG.AS vs ESE.PA Comparison March 2026
ALLFG.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLFG.AS stands at 5.1B. In comparison, ESE.PA has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, ALLFG.AS is priced at €8.40, while ESE.PA trades at €29.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLFG.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -32.35, whereas ESE.PA's P/E ratio is 28.01. In terms of profitability, ALLFG.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ESE.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLFG.AS is more volatile compared to ESE.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLFG.AS.Check ESE.PA's competition here
ALLFG.AS vs RF.PA Comparison March 2026
ALLFG.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLFG.AS stands at 5.1B. In comparison, RF.PA has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ALLFG.AS is priced at €8.40, while RF.PA trades at €39.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLFG.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -32.35, whereas RF.PA's P/E ratio is -5.05. In terms of profitability, ALLFG.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RF.PA's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLFG.AS is less volatile compared to RF.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLFG.AS.Check RF.PA's competition here
ALLFG.AS vs SGLU.AS Comparison March 2026
ALLFG.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLFG.AS stands at 5.1B. In comparison, SGLU.AS has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ALLFG.AS is priced at €8.40, while SGLU.AS trades at €5.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLFG.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -32.35, whereas SGLU.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALLFG.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SGLU.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLFG.AS is more volatile compared to SGLU.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLFG.AS.Check SGLU.AS's competition here
ALLFG.AS vs TKO.PA Comparison March 2026
ALLFG.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLFG.AS stands at 5.1B. In comparison, TKO.PA has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ALLFG.AS is priced at €8.40, while TKO.PA trades at €16.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLFG.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -32.35, whereas TKO.PA's P/E ratio is 15.92. In terms of profitability, ALLFG.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TKO.PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLFG.AS is less volatile compared to TKO.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLFG.AS.Check TKO.PA's competition here
ALLFG.AS vs SUOA.AS Comparison March 2026
ALLFG.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLFG.AS stands at 5.1B. In comparison, SUOA.AS has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ALLFG.AS is priced at €8.40, while SUOA.AS trades at €5.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLFG.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -32.35, whereas SUOA.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALLFG.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SUOA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLFG.AS is more volatile compared to SUOA.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLFG.AS.Check SUOA.AS's competition here
ALLFG.AS vs EPAB.PA Comparison March 2026
ALLFG.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLFG.AS stands at 5.1B. In comparison, EPAB.PA has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ALLFG.AS is priced at €8.40, while EPAB.PA trades at €38.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLFG.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -32.35, whereas EPAB.PA's P/E ratio is 17.05. In terms of profitability, ALLFG.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EPAB.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLFG.AS is more volatile compared to EPAB.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLFG.AS.Check EPAB.PA's competition here
ALLFG.AS vs BNK.PA Comparison March 2026
ALLFG.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLFG.AS stands at 5.1B. In comparison, BNK.PA has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ALLFG.AS is priced at €8.40, while BNK.PA trades at €58.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLFG.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -32.35, whereas BNK.PA's P/E ratio is 11.65. In terms of profitability, ALLFG.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BNK.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLFG.AS is more volatile compared to BNK.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLFG.AS.Check BNK.PA's competition here
ALLFG.AS vs TI5A.AS Comparison March 2026
ALLFG.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLFG.AS stands at 5.1B. In comparison, TI5A.AS has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ALLFG.AS is priced at €8.40, while TI5A.AS trades at €114.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLFG.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -32.35, whereas TI5A.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALLFG.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TI5A.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLFG.AS is more volatile compared to TI5A.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLFG.AS.Check TI5A.AS's competition here
ALLFG.AS vs JAPB.AS Comparison March 2026
ALLFG.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLFG.AS stands at 5.1B. In comparison, JAPB.AS has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ALLFG.AS is priced at €8.40, while JAPB.AS trades at €922.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLFG.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -32.35, whereas JAPB.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALLFG.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JAPB.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLFG.AS is more volatile compared to JAPB.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLFG.AS.Check JAPB.AS's competition here
ALLFG.AS vs TNOW.PA Comparison March 2026
ALLFG.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLFG.AS stands at 5.1B. In comparison, TNOW.PA has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ALLFG.AS is priced at €8.40, while TNOW.PA trades at €929.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLFG.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -32.35, whereas TNOW.PA's P/E ratio is 35.94. In terms of profitability, ALLFG.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TNOW.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLFG.AS is more volatile compared to TNOW.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLFG.AS.Check TNOW.PA's competition here
ALLFG.AS vs SEMI.AS Comparison March 2026
ALLFG.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLFG.AS stands at 5.1B. In comparison, SEMI.AS has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ALLFG.AS is priced at €8.40, while SEMI.AS trades at €13.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLFG.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -32.35, whereas SEMI.AS's P/E ratio is 37.21. In terms of profitability, ALLFG.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SEMI.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLFG.AS is more volatile compared to SEMI.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLFG.AS.Check SEMI.AS's competition here
ALLFG.AS vs ANX.PA Comparison March 2026
ALLFG.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLFG.AS stands at 5.1B. In comparison, ANX.PA has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ALLFG.AS is priced at €8.40, while ANX.PA trades at €246.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLFG.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -32.35, whereas ANX.PA's P/E ratio is 33.37. In terms of profitability, ALLFG.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ANX.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLFG.AS is more volatile compared to ANX.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLFG.AS.Check ANX.PA's competition here
ALLFG.AS vs IUHE.AS Comparison March 2026
ALLFG.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLFG.AS stands at 5.1B. In comparison, IUHE.AS has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ALLFG.AS is priced at €8.40, while IUHE.AS trades at €6.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLFG.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -32.35, whereas IUHE.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALLFG.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IUHE.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLFG.AS is more volatile compared to IUHE.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLFG.AS.Check IUHE.AS's competition here
ALLFG.AS vs IGLE.AS Comparison March 2026
ALLFG.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLFG.AS stands at 5.1B. In comparison, IGLE.AS has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ALLFG.AS is priced at €8.40, while IGLE.AS trades at €4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLFG.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -32.35, whereas IGLE.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALLFG.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IGLE.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLFG.AS is more volatile compared to IGLE.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLFG.AS.Check IGLE.AS's competition here
ALLFG.AS vs AASI.PA Comparison March 2026
ALLFG.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLFG.AS stands at 5.1B. In comparison, AASI.PA has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ALLFG.AS is priced at €8.40, while AASI.PA trades at €48.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLFG.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -32.35, whereas AASI.PA's P/E ratio is 18.69. In terms of profitability, ALLFG.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AASI.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLFG.AS is more volatile compared to AASI.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLFG.AS.Check AASI.PA's competition here
ALLFG.AS vs ACWI.PA Comparison March 2026
ALLFG.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLFG.AS stands at 5.1B. In comparison, ACWI.PA has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ALLFG.AS is priced at €8.40, while ACWI.PA trades at €536.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLFG.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -32.35, whereas ACWI.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALLFG.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ACWI.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLFG.AS is more volatile compared to ACWI.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLFG.AS.Check ACWI.PA's competition here
ALLFG.AS vs CTEC.AS Comparison March 2026
ALLFG.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLFG.AS stands at 5.1B. In comparison, CTEC.AS has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ALLFG.AS is priced at €8.40, while CTEC.AS trades at €5.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLFG.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -32.35, whereas CTEC.AS's P/E ratio is 17.60. In terms of profitability, ALLFG.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CTEC.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLFG.AS is more volatile compared to CTEC.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLFG.AS.Check CTEC.AS's competition here
ALLFG.AS vs USRI.PA Comparison March 2026
ALLFG.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALLFG.AS stands at 5.1B. In comparison, USRI.PA has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ALLFG.AS is priced at €8.40, while USRI.PA trades at €102.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALLFG.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -32.35, whereas USRI.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALLFG.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to USRI.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ALLFG.AS is more volatile compared to USRI.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALLFG.AS.Check USRI.PA's competition here