Albany International Corp.
Albany International Corp. (AIN) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (AIN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Apparel - Manufacturers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AIN | $72.23 | +0.58% | 2.2B | 29.00 | $2.49 | +1.49% |
| RL | $298.23 | +0.98% | 18.1B | 25.72 | $11.60 | +1.14% |
| LEVI | $20.45 | -0.54% | 8.1B | 19.47 | $1.05 | +2.59% |
| GIL | $52.25 | +0.19% | 7.9B | 20.49 | $2.55 | +1.65% |
| VFC | $12.67 | -0.08% | 4.9B | 70.36 | $0.18 | +2.84% |
| PVH | $76.85 | +0.85% | 3.7B | 10.84 | $7.09 | +0.20% |
| KTB | $62.41 | -1.08% | 3.5B | 15.33 | $4.07 | +3.33% |
| COLM | $60.63 | +0.31% | 3.3B | 15.71 | $3.86 | +1.98% |
| UAA | $7.36 | +2.65% | 3B | -15.65 | -$0.47 | N/A |
| UA | $6.92 | +2.06% | 3B | -14.70 | -$0.47 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
AIN vs RL Comparison July 2025
AIN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIN stands at 2.2B. In comparison, RL has a market cap of 18.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AIN is priced at $72.23, while RL trades at $298.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.00, whereas RL's P/E ratio is 25.72. In terms of profitability, AIN's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RL's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, AIN is less volatile compared to RL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIN.Check RL's competition here
AIN vs LEVI Comparison July 2025
AIN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIN stands at 2.2B. In comparison, LEVI has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AIN is priced at $72.23, while LEVI trades at $20.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.00, whereas LEVI's P/E ratio is 19.47. In terms of profitability, AIN's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LEVI's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AIN is more volatile compared to LEVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIN.Check LEVI's competition here
AIN vs GIL Comparison July 2025
AIN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIN stands at 2.2B. In comparison, GIL has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AIN is priced at $72.23, while GIL trades at $52.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.00, whereas GIL's P/E ratio is 20.49. In terms of profitability, AIN's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GIL's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, AIN is more volatile compared to GIL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIN.Check GIL's competition here
AIN vs VFC Comparison July 2025
AIN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIN stands at 2.2B. In comparison, VFC has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AIN is priced at $72.23, while VFC trades at $12.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.00, whereas VFC's P/E ratio is 70.36. In terms of profitability, AIN's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VFC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AIN is less volatile compared to VFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIN.Check VFC's competition here
AIN vs PVH Comparison July 2025
AIN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIN stands at 2.2B. In comparison, PVH has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AIN is priced at $72.23, while PVH trades at $76.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.00, whereas PVH's P/E ratio is 10.84. In terms of profitability, AIN's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PVH's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AIN is less volatile compared to PVH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIN.Check PVH's competition here
AIN vs KTB Comparison July 2025
AIN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIN stands at 2.2B. In comparison, KTB has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AIN is priced at $72.23, while KTB trades at $62.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.00, whereas KTB's P/E ratio is 15.33. In terms of profitability, AIN's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KTB's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, AIN is less volatile compared to KTB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIN.Check KTB's competition here
AIN vs COLM Comparison July 2025
AIN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIN stands at 2.2B. In comparison, COLM has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AIN is priced at $72.23, while COLM trades at $60.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.00, whereas COLM's P/E ratio is 15.71. In terms of profitability, AIN's ROE is +0.08%, compared to COLM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AIN is less volatile compared to COLM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIN.Check COLM's competition here
AIN vs UAA Comparison July 2025
AIN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIN stands at 2.2B. In comparison, UAA has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, AIN is priced at $72.23, while UAA trades at $7.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.00, whereas UAA's P/E ratio is -15.65. In terms of profitability, AIN's ROE is +0.08%, compared to UAA's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AIN is less volatile compared to UAA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIN.Check UAA's competition here
AIN vs UA Comparison July 2025
AIN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIN stands at 2.2B. In comparison, UA has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, AIN is priced at $72.23, while UA trades at $6.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.00, whereas UA's P/E ratio is -14.70. In terms of profitability, AIN's ROE is +0.08%, compared to UA's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AIN is less volatile compared to UA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIN.Check UA's competition here
AIN vs ZGN Comparison July 2025
AIN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIN stands at 2.2B. In comparison, ZGN has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AIN is priced at $72.23, while ZGN trades at $9.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.00, whereas ZGN's P/E ratio is 26.19. In terms of profitability, AIN's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ZGN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AIN is more volatile compared to ZGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIN.Check ZGN's competition here
AIN vs HBI Comparison July 2025
AIN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIN stands at 2.2B. In comparison, HBI has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AIN is priced at $72.23, while HBI trades at $4.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.00, whereas HBI's P/E ratio is -30.43. In terms of profitability, AIN's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HBI's ROE of -3.99%. Regarding short-term risk, AIN is less volatile compared to HBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIN.Check HBI's competition here
AIN vs GOOS Comparison July 2025
AIN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIN stands at 2.2B. In comparison, GOOS has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AIN is priced at $72.23, while GOOS trades at $14.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.00, whereas GOOS's P/E ratio is 20.19. In terms of profitability, AIN's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GOOS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, AIN is less volatile compared to GOOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIN.Check GOOS's competition here
AIN vs FIGS Comparison July 2025
AIN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIN stands at 2.2B. In comparison, FIGS has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AIN is priced at $72.23, while FIGS trades at $6.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.00, whereas FIGS's P/E ratio is 653.50. In terms of profitability, AIN's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FIGS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AIN is less volatile compared to FIGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIN.Check FIGS's competition here
AIN vs GIII Comparison July 2025
AIN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIN stands at 2.2B. In comparison, GIII has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, AIN is priced at $72.23, while GIII trades at $24.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.00, whereas GIII's P/E ratio is 5.67. In terms of profitability, AIN's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GIII's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AIN is less volatile compared to GIII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIN.Check GIII's competition here
AIN vs OXM Comparison July 2025
AIN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIN stands at 2.2B. In comparison, OXM has a market cap of 637.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AIN is priced at $72.23, while OXM trades at $42.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.00, whereas OXM's P/E ratio is 8.29. In terms of profitability, AIN's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OXM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AIN is less volatile compared to OXM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIN.Check OXM's competition here
AIN vs SGC Comparison July 2025
AIN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIN stands at 2.2B. In comparison, SGC has a market cap of 175.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AIN is priced at $72.23, while SGC trades at $10.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.00, whereas SGC's P/E ratio is 24.95. In terms of profitability, AIN's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SGC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AIN is less volatile compared to SGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIN.Check SGC's competition here
AIN vs LAKE Comparison July 2025
AIN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIN stands at 2.2B. In comparison, LAKE has a market cap of 142.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AIN is priced at $72.23, while LAKE trades at $14.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.00, whereas LAKE's P/E ratio is -4.89. In terms of profitability, AIN's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LAKE's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AIN is less volatile compared to LAKE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIN.Check LAKE's competition here
AIN vs UFI Comparison July 2025
AIN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIN stands at 2.2B. In comparison, UFI has a market cap of 86.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AIN is priced at $72.23, while UFI trades at $4.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.00, whereas UFI's P/E ratio is -2.17. In terms of profitability, AIN's ROE is +0.08%, compared to UFI's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AIN is more volatile compared to UFI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIN.Check UFI's competition here
AIN vs CULP Comparison July 2025
AIN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIN stands at 2.2B. In comparison, CULP has a market cap of 57M. Regarding current trading prices, AIN is priced at $72.23, while CULP trades at $4.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.00, whereas CULP's P/E ratio is -2.97. In terms of profitability, AIN's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CULP's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AIN is less volatile compared to CULP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIN.Check CULP's competition here
AIN vs JRSH Comparison July 2025
AIN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIN stands at 2.2B. In comparison, JRSH has a market cap of 44.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AIN is priced at $72.23, while JRSH trades at $3.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.00, whereas JRSH's P/E ratio is -49.57. In terms of profitability, AIN's ROE is +0.08%, compared to JRSH's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AIN is less volatile compared to JRSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIN.Check JRSH's competition here
AIN vs JL Comparison July 2025
AIN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIN stands at 2.2B. In comparison, JL has a market cap of 20.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AIN is priced at $72.23, while JL trades at $6.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.00, whereas JL's P/E ratio is 0.89. In terms of profitability, AIN's ROE is +0.08%, compared to JL's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AIN is less volatile compared to JL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIN.Check JL's competition here
AIN vs VNCE Comparison July 2025
AIN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIN stands at 2.2B. In comparison, VNCE has a market cap of 20M. Regarding current trading prices, AIN is priced at $72.23, while VNCE trades at $1.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.00, whereas VNCE's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, AIN's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VNCE's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, AIN is less volatile compared to VNCE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIN.Check VNCE's competition here
AIN vs PMNT Comparison July 2025
AIN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIN stands at 2.2B. In comparison, PMNT has a market cap of 11.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AIN is priced at $72.23, while PMNT trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.00, whereas PMNT's P/E ratio is -0.37. In terms of profitability, AIN's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PMNT's ROE of -6.27%. Regarding short-term risk, AIN is less volatile compared to PMNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIN.Check PMNT's competition here
AIN vs LLL Comparison July 2025
AIN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIN stands at 2.2B. In comparison, LLL has a market cap of 10.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AIN is priced at $72.23, while LLL trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.00, whereas LLL's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, AIN's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LLL's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, AIN is less volatile compared to LLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIN.Check LLL's competition here
AIN vs NCI Comparison July 2025
AIN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIN stands at 2.2B. In comparison, NCI has a market cap of 8.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AIN is priced at $72.23, while NCI trades at $2.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.00, whereas NCI's P/E ratio is 8.04. In terms of profitability, AIN's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NCI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AIN is less volatile compared to NCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIN.Check NCI's competition here
AIN vs DXYN Comparison July 2025
AIN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIN stands at 2.2B. In comparison, DXYN has a market cap of 6.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AIN is priced at $72.23, while DXYN trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.00, whereas DXYN's P/E ratio is -0.62. In terms of profitability, AIN's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DXYN's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, AIN is more volatile compared to DXYN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIN.Check DXYN's competition here
AIN vs JXJT Comparison July 2025
AIN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIN stands at 2.2B. In comparison, JXJT has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AIN is priced at $72.23, while JXJT trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.00, whereas JXJT's P/E ratio is 1.47. In terms of profitability, AIN's ROE is +0.08%, compared to JXJT's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, AIN is less volatile compared to JXJT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIN.Check JXJT's competition here
AIN vs DLA Comparison July 2025
AIN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIN stands at 2.2B. In comparison, DLA has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AIN is priced at $72.23, while DLA trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.00, whereas DLA's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, AIN's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DLA's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, AIN is less volatile compared to DLA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIN.Check DLA's competition here
AIN vs XELB Comparison July 2025
AIN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIN stands at 2.2B. In comparison, XELB has a market cap of 3.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AIN is priced at $72.23, while XELB trades at $1.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.00, whereas XELB's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, AIN's ROE is +0.08%, compared to XELB's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, AIN is less volatile compared to XELB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIN.Check XELB's competition here
AIN vs EVK Comparison July 2025
AIN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIN stands at 2.2B. In comparison, EVK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AIN is priced at $72.23, while EVK trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.00, whereas EVK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AIN's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EVK's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AIN is less volatile compared to EVK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIN.Check EVK's competition here
AIN vs KBSF Comparison July 2025
AIN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIN stands at 2.2B. In comparison, KBSF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AIN is priced at $72.23, while KBSF trades at $3.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.00, whereas KBSF's P/E ratio is -1.46. In terms of profitability, AIN's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KBSF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AIN is less volatile compared to KBSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIN.Check KBSF's competition here
AIN vs SQBG Comparison July 2025
AIN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIN stands at 2.2B. In comparison, SQBG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AIN is priced at $72.23, while SQBG trades at $6.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.00, whereas SQBG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AIN's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SQBG's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, AIN is less volatile compared to SQBG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIN.Check SQBG's competition here